Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush



 Science > Abortion > Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"
Date: 07 Jul 2005 08:21:14 PM
Object: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush
Why do NeoCons hate America?
http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1749 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.

User: "Eris"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 14 Jul 2005 05:24:14 PM
On 14 Jul 2005 15:03:51 -0700, "David" <davecheryll@earthlink.net>
wrote:



DanielSan wrote:

David wrote:


Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 07:54:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:


On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:59:09 GMT, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com>
wrote:


I'm just curious if President Dumbfuck bothers to think about bin Laden
*NOW*?


Oh, I'm sure 'rat willie wakes up at nite and wonders is only he had done
something about obl. Then the world would think highly of him instead.


Unlike AWOL, who has let Osama Bin Laden run free 43 months AFTER 911,
Clinton would have long caught him.




Yeah right. They were looking for him for years because of the embassy
bombings and other terrorism back in the '90's. Sudan even gave Clinton
an engraved invitation to pick him up, and nothing was done.


Which is, of course, a total lie. There was no real "Sudan invitation."
It was simply an offer from a Sudanese warlord that never really
panned out.


You mean never really pursued.

To say that it was an "engraved invitation" is a rightie lie.


You are correct, the invitation was not actually engraved.


Bush has dramatically increased terrorism, but claiming Clinton would
have caught Osama is *****.


Agreed. Osama didn't attack America's home-soil (Embassy bombings, USS
Cole, etc aren't "home-soil" in many Americans' minds) until after Clinton.

Like all crime (terrorist attacks are crimes), you cannot prosecute
until the crime has been commited. See, in a civilized world, you're
innocent until proven guilty; you're innocent until you commit the crime.


No kidding.

Thinking about killing someone is *NOT* the same as killing someone.
You can prosecute the latter, not the former. Unfortunately for
Clinton, the "thinking" and "planning" was done during his time.


The embassy bombings did not kill anyone?

Was OBL the mastermind of the Lebanon Marine Barracks bombing? Why
didn't Ronnie pursue him?
.
User: "David"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 15 Jul 2005 02:15:52 PM
Eris wrote:

On 14 Jul 2005 15:03:51 -0700, "David" <davecheryll@earthlink.net>
wrote:



DanielSan wrote:

David wrote:


Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 07:54:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:


On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:59:09 GMT, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com>
wrote:


I'm just curious if President Dumbfuck bothers to think about bin Laden
*NOW*?


Oh, I'm sure 'rat willie wakes up at nite and wonders is only he had done
something about obl. Then the world would think highly of him instead.


Unlike AWOL, who has let Osama Bin Laden run free 43 months AFTER 911,
Clinton would have long caught him.




Yeah right. They were looking for him for years because of the embassy
bombings and other terrorism back in the '90's. Sudan even gave Clinton
an engraved invitation to pick him up, and nothing was done.


Which is, of course, a total lie. There was no real "Sudan invitation."
It was simply an offer from a Sudanese warlord that never really
panned out.


You mean never really pursued.

To say that it was an "engraved invitation" is a rightie lie.


You are correct, the invitation was not actually engraved.


Bush has dramatically increased terrorism, but claiming Clinton would
have caught Osama is *****.


Agreed. Osama didn't attack America's home-soil (Embassy bombings, USS
Cole, etc aren't "home-soil" in many Americans' minds) until after Clinton.

Like all crime (terrorist attacks are crimes), you cannot prosecute
until the crime has been commited. See, in a civilized world, you're
innocent until proven guilty; you're innocent until you commit the crime.


No kidding.

Thinking about killing someone is *NOT* the same as killing someone.
You can prosecute the latter, not the former. Unfortunately for
Clinton, the "thinking" and "planning" was done during his time.


The embassy bombings did not kill anyone?


Was OBL the mastermind of the Lebanon Marine Barracks bombing? Why
didn't Ronnie pursue him?

What makes you think I give a damn about Reagan? Although I did like
the fact that both Reagan and Clinton knew better than to get stuck in
a land war.
.


User: "nJb"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 12 Jul 2005 12:03:17 AM
duke wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:59:09 GMT, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com>
wrote:


I'm just curious if President Dumbfuck bothers to think about bin Laden
*NOW*?



Oh, I'm sure 'rat willie wakes up at nite and wonders is only he had done
something about obl. Then the world would think highly of him instead.

duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

The world thinks highly of him and I'm sure he doesn't wake up until
morning unless he has to *****.
--
Jack
Plonked by Native American
bobo1148atxmissiondotcom
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/xmissionbobo/
.

User: "Paul Duca"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 09 Jul 2005 06:54:08 PM
in article e6ivc1h1ivvtcdgor9ibpnch3ipl4l8shi@4ax.com, duke at
duckgumbo32@cox.net wrote on 7/9/05 8:54 AM:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:59:09 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahooX.com>
wrote:

I'm just curious if President Dumbfuck bothers to think about bin Laden
*NOW*?


Oh, I'm sure 'rat willie wakes up at nite and wonders is only he had done
something about obl. Then the world would think highly of him instead.

Why doesn't Duke give him lessons on how to be content, treated like
dirt...it works in HIS life!
Paul
.
User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 10 Jul 2005 04:18:24 AM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 19:54:08 -0400, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote:
<PIGGYBACKING>

in article e6ivc1h1ivvtcdgor9ibpnch3ipl4l8shi@4ax.com, duke at
duckgumbo32@cox.net wrote on 7/9/05 8:54 AM:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:59:09 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahooX.com>
wrote:

I'm just curious if President Dumbfuck bothers to think about bin Laden
*NOW*?


Oh, I'm sure 'rat willie wakes up at nite and wonders is only he had done
something about obl. Then the world would think highly of him instead.

What planet are you living on, Earl? On this one, "the world", as you put it,
does think far more highly of Clinton than of your hero Bush.





Why doesn't Duke give him lessons on how to be content, treated like
dirt...it works in HIS life!



Paul

.


User: "duke"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 09 Jul 2005 07:53:21 AM
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002

Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter titled "Losing
Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "Mickey"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 09 Jul 2005 08:03:23 AM
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.

And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 09 Jul 2005 04:55:00 PM
Mickey wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this

And yet those who planned it were in the U.S. under Clinton's watch.
Also, 1993 WTC. Not to mention several other terrorist attacks that
were going on during Clinton's term.
.
User: "Mickey"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 09 Jul 2005 08:19:48 PM
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1120946099.857621.92130@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Mickey wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter

titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


And yet those who planned it were in the U.S. under Clinton's watch.
Also, 1993 WTC. Not to mention several other terrorist attacks that
were going on during Clinton's term.

I see... so an attack that happened one year after Bush took office was
planned under Clinton's watch, but an attack that took place one year after
Clinton took office wasn't planned before he got there? This is MIGHTY
convenient bs.
.
User: "Z"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 16 Jul 2005 04:55:27 PM
Here is where the proof is for you to quote.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/804yqqnr.asp
Z
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ipednW5Pjqsk6k3fRVn-qA@comcast.com...

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1120946099.857621.92130@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Mickey wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking

AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter

titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


And yet those who planned it were in the U.S. under Clinton's watch.
Also, 1993 WTC. Not to mention several other terrorist attacks that
were going on during Clinton's term.


I see... so an attack that happened one year after Bush took office was
planned under Clinton's watch, but an attack that took place one year

after

Clinton took office wasn't planned before he got there? This is MIGHTY
convenient bs.


.
User: "DanielSan"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 16 Jul 2005 05:18:58 PM
Z wrote:

Here is where the proof is for you to quote.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/804yqqnr.asp

Hm. Nothing there to suggest that Hussein's government had any
connections to the Taliban or Osama bin Laden.
And you top-posted, which is rude.


Z

"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ipednW5Pjqsk6k3fRVn-qA@comcast.com...

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1120946099.857621.92130@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


Mickey wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking


AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:


Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter


titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


And yet those who planned it were in the U.S. under Clinton's watch.
Also, 1993 WTC. Not to mention several other terrorist attacks that
were going on during Clinton's term.


I see... so an attack that happened one year after Bush took office was
planned under Clinton's watch, but an attack that took place one year


after

Clinton took office wasn't planned before he got there? This is MIGHTY
convenient bs.




--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, *
* the non-existence of Zeus or Thor - but they *
* have few followers now." Arthur C. Clarke *
****************************************************
.


User: "osprey"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 09 Jul 2005 11:53:49 PM
Mickey wrote:

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1120946099.857621.92130@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...



Mickey wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter

titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


And yet those who planned it were in the U.S. under Clinton's watch.
Also, 1993 WTC. Not to mention several other terrorist attacks that
were going on during Clinton's term.


I see... so an attack that happened one year after Bush took office was
planned under Clinton's watch, but an attack that took place one year after
Clinton took office wasn't planned before he got there? This is MIGHTY
convenient bs.

It was planned under Clinton's watch and they were IN THE U.S. doing
their planning.
The point I am trying to make, before you go off the deep end, is that
we can point fingers at Clinton, Bush, Bush Sr., and so on. It's
stupid to blame any of the Presidents for what happened. Terrorism can
NOT be prevented. We are just too big of a country, so diversified, and
we have a bad habit of becoming complacent. We can become more
vigilant, more aware, and deter some terrorism, but no one is ever
going to stop it completely.
If one is going to blame Bush for 9/11, then we can point fingers all
day long. That was my point.
All we can do now is hope our Government learned something and we
learned something and all work together at minimizing terrorism instead
of letting it go unchecked.
.
User: "eddie wilson"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 10 Jul 2005 10:45:03 AM
The lesson to be learned is not to interfere in other countries. It's
none of our damn business. What if some other nation had sent troops
to Gettysburg?
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 10 Jul 2005 12:16:35 AM
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Mickey wrote:

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message

Mickey wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter

titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


And yet those who planned it were in the U.S. under Clinton's watch.
Also, 1993 WTC. Not to mention several other terrorist attacks that
were going on during Clinton's term.


I see... so an attack that happened one year after Bush took office was
planned under Clinton's watch, but an attack that took place one year after
Clinton took office wasn't planned before he got there? This is MIGHTY
convenient bs.


It was planned under Clinton's watch and they were IN THE U.S. doing
their planning.

Mary Ann proves herself to be a hypocritical bigot.

The point I am trying to make, before you go off the deep end, is that

.... you're a liar, an *****, and a dumbshit bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.



User: "Eris"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 14 Jul 2005 05:32:42 PM
On 9 Jul 2005 14:55:00 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:



Mickey wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


And yet those who planned it were in the U.S. under Clinton's watch.
Also, 1993 WTC. Not to mention several other terrorist attacks that
were going on during Clinton's term.

Look at all of the terrorist attacks under Ronnie! The Marine Barracks
was the worst, and to have Ronnie turn tail and run. Why didn't Ronnie
track down Bin Laden?
.


User: "duke"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 10 Jul 2005 09:31:16 AM
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:03:23 -0400, "Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote:

"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's

Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter titled

"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this

Using 'rat willie's intelligence (pardon the pun) service for information.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "nJb"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 12 Jul 2005 12:07:25 AM
duke wrote:

On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:03:23 -0400, "Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote:


"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s3ivc1dhhd3f8he4p0ur2hqit2iin3lalh@4ax.com...

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's


Cocaine

Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:


Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter titled


"Losing

Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this



Using 'rat willie's intelligence (pardon the pun) service for information.

duke

Sorry, that one will only fly among your brain dead repub cohorts.
--
Jack
Plonked by Native American
bobo1148atxmissiondotcom
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/xmissionbobo/
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 12 Jul 2005 12:09:08 PM
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:07:25 -0600, nJb <none@nowhere.com> wrote:

And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this

Using 'rat willie's intelligence (pardon the pun) service for information.

Sorry, that one will only fly among your brain dead repub cohorts.

Yet it's already accepted fact.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "nJb"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 13 Jul 2005 02:48:59 AM
duke wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:07:25 -0600, nJb <none@nowhere.com> wrote:


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


Using 'rat willie's intelligence (pardon the pun) service for information.



Sorry, that one will only fly among your brain dead repub cohorts.



Yet it's already accepted fact.

duke

Among you and... among you.
--
Jack
Plonked by Native American
bobo1148atxmissiondotcom
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/xmissionbobo/
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 13 Jul 2005 06:01:31 PM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:48:59 -0600, nJb <none@nowhere.com> wrote:

duke wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:07:25 -0600, nJb <none@nowhere.com> wrote:


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


Using 'rat willie's intelligence (pardon the pun) service for information.



Sorry, that one will only fly among your brain dead repub cohorts.



Yet it's already accepted fact.

Among you and... among you.

Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "Eris"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 14 Jul 2005 05:35:08 PM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:01:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:48:59 -0600, nJb <none@nowhere.com> wrote:

duke wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:07:25 -0600, nJb <none@nowhere.com> wrote:


And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


Using 'rat willie's intelligence (pardon the pun) service for information.



Sorry, that one will only fly among your brain dead repub cohorts.



Yet it's already accepted fact.

Among you and... among you.


Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

We are supposed to respect Bush while you call ex President Clinton
names.
Bawahahahahahahaha
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 15 Jul 2005 02:18:45 PM
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:35:08 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com> wrote:

Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.

We are supposed to respect Bush while you call ex President Clinton
names.

Yes - George Bush IS President.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "ۥ R. L. Measures"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 15 Jul 2005 03:48:04 PM
In article <ou2gd1drm674c654gej82j7ur109qlkfmf@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:35:08 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com> wrote:

Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.


We are supposed to respect Bush while you call ex President Clinton
names.


Yes - George Bush IS President.

** Alas, for three more years and a half. Perhaps there's a connection
between White House Interns going down and terrorism going down?
--
Rich. 805.386.3734
.

User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 16 Jul 2005 12:07:40 AM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
:On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:35:08 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com> wrote:
:>>Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.
:>We are supposed to respect Bush while you call ex President Clinton
:>names.
:Yes - George Bush IS President.
....until January 20, 2009 at the worst - and while Nixon was President, that
didn't oblige a single American to respect him. Chew on that concept for a
while.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.

User: "DanielSan"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 15 Jul 2005 09:23:17 PM
duke wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:35:08 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com> wrote:


Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.



We are supposed to respect Bush while you call ex President Clinton
names.



Yes - George Bush IS President.

Will you attack the next president, if he's Democrat?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, *
* the non-existence of Zeus or Thor - but they *
* have few followers now." Arthur C. Clarke *
****************************************************
.
User: "ۥ R. L. Measures"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 15 Jul 2005 10:27:49 PM
In article <pc_Be.3009$Zu1.2979@trnddc04>, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:

duke wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:35:08 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com> wrote:


Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.



We are supposed to respect Bush while you call ex President Clinton
names.



Yes - George Bush IS President.


Will you attack the next president, if he's Democrat?

• All presidents need to be attacked when they are fucking up and / or
fucking around.
--
Rich. 805.386.3734
.


User: "Paul Duca"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 17 Jul 2005 05:40:08 AM
in article ou2gd1drm674c654gej82j7ur109qlkfmf@4ax.com, duke at
duckgumbo32@cox.net wrote on 7/15/05 3:18 PM:

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:35:08 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com> wrote:

Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.


We are supposed to respect Bush while you call ex President Clinton
names.


Duke expects large sums of money, and maybe ever sexually compliant
Catholic girls, for doing do.
Paul
.



User: "nJb"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 14 Jul 2005 02:28:58 PM
duke wrote:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:48:59 -0600, nJb <none@nowhere.com> wrote:


duke wrote:


On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:07:25 -0600, nJb <none@nowhere.com> wrote:



And yet, the WTC happened on the Republican watch. Odd this


Using 'rat willie's intelligence (pardon the pun) service for information.



Sorry, that one will only fly among your brain dead repub cohorts.



Yet it's already accepted fact.


Among you and... among you.



Nope, EVERYONE knows where the intel came from - 'rat willie's CIA.
duke

Not everyone. Only you and you're nobody.
--
Jack
Plonked by Native American
bobo1148atxmissiondotcom
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/xmissionbobo/
.







User: "Eris"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 14 Jul 2005 05:31:17 PM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 07:53:21 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter titled "Losing
Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.

duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

BUSH: ... I don't know where he is. Nor -- you know, I just don't
spend that much time on him really, to be honest with you [...]
Q: Do you believe the threat that bin Laden posed won't truly be
eliminated until he is found either dead of alive?
BUSH: As I say, we hadn't heard much from him. And I wouldn't
necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, you
know, again, I don't know where he is.
I'll repeat what I said: I truly am not that concerned about him.
-President George W. Bush, March 13, 2003
.

User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"

Title: Re: Terrorism Went DOWN Under Clinton, UP Under Bush 09 Jul 2005 04:50:48 PM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 07:53:21 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:21:14 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

Why do NeoCons hate America?

http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1002


Yet right here in my little fingers is a book by Richard Miniter titled "Losing
Bin Laden", or how 'rat willie's failures unleashed global terror.

Oh look, "facts" too incovenient for 63-year-old biological failure
Earl J Weber of Baton Rouge. What part of the data above don't you
understand?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka
aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1751 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.



  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.647     pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER