Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin



 Science > Abortion > Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "J"
Date: 08 Apr 2005 03:00:00 PM
Object: Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-4923426,00.html
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) - Eric Rudolph has agreed to plead guilty in the
deadly 1996 bombing at the Atlanta Olympics and three other blasts, a
bombing victim's relative told The Associated Press on Friday.
.

User: "Johnny"

Title: Re: Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin 14 Apr 2005 01:37:13 PM
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113490724.600136.241800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113397013.243751.266900@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113334570.226607.240070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk3btw2czk.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwtr85un9.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:


"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d395p6$3ih$1@bolt.sonic.net...


[a lot dumped, because Cuckoo Wentzky can't be bothered to

pay

attention]


On that day I lost my friend, a police officer

providing

security

at
our clinic, and I nearly lost my own life.


Too bad she didn't die.


You're advocating terrorism, right there. Live with it.


I did nothing of the sort. Your LIE is only that, a lie.


Call 713 308-8000,


What is that numner to again?

then, and tell whoever answers how hurt your feelings are.
Be sure and tell them what -you- wrote to prompt my response,

though.

That
might even teach you something.


They wouldn't have a problem with what I wrote. Maybe one or

two

of

them

would be surprised, but you know men and women are just doing

what

they are

told to do, or they lose their job or they are demoted or

subject

to

a

negative evaluation.
I am not surprised at al by what I see going on, considering

the

legal

arrangement which produces all these phenomena.


Interesting, Johnny is bitching about people having their rights
violated, all while wanting to have the rights of those he hates
violated.


So, who am I hating now?


The same people you've always hated - pregnant women who want an
abortion.


Is there a reason NOT to hate them and/or the men who got them

pregnant?

Sure.

Why?
What reason is there not to hate irresponsible, consensual sex act cowards?

If you can't figure out why, then you're more evil than I
suspected.

Tell me why they should NOT be hated.
You have shown me no reason whatsoever that people who use abortion to
escape their created responsibility should not be hated.

By the way, in another posting you claimed not to hate them
- another lie.

You need to learn to read english and recognize the difference between
statements and questions.


There you go with that 'hate' ploy again.
Just who am I hating?


See above.


I saw it, numbskull.


This time, read it.

Who am I hating then?








[...]

Because of the ongoing investigation I can't talk

about

the

details

of
that day, but I can tell you what my life has been like

since.

In the

last six and a half months, I've spent almost thirty

hours

on

an

operating table in nine different operations,


None of which killed her as killed all the fetuses that

were

surgically

aborted in the Clinic she was employed in during her time

there.


...and you're whining because she lived? Some "pro-lifer"

you

are.


I am pro-life to the point that I like to see those who are

anti-life and

guilty, dead. I do not like hearing corrupt, anti-life

vessels

speak.


So it's okay to kill anyone you don't like?


That's your interpretation?


You said you want people who are anti-life and guilty dead.

There

is

no other interpretation.


Is the only way for people to be dead to kill them?


The usual pro-life stance would indicate a "yes" as the answer to

that

question.


You dumbass.
Are you Pro-LIFE speaking for Pro-LIFE?


I'm speaking from past experience with freaks like you.

You seem to be speaking from a deceived mind which assumes wrongly about
some persons.



That's why you and your ilk support bombing abortion clinics
- to kill the people you don't like.


LOL!!!!!!!!!
Who is dead and who is alive?


Just as I expected, you really do drool over the thought of killing
people you don't like.

Never saw that in what I wrote.
It isn't there.
You seem to be some lamebran coward who tries to make up lies about other
people.
I see abortion clinic bombings as a manifestation of Roe V Wade being
repudiated by citizens who hate it very much.
Doesn;t bother me in the slightest when it happens.
It is a social phenomenon brought on by legalized abortion ON DEMAND!
Show me one instance of abortion clinics being bombed before Roe V Wade,
excluding California.



LOL!!!!!!



I'm glad you're not going to be
allowed out of your county at all.

[...]

Now, my vision is too poor to read.


Good. We do not need her reading.


You don't decide that, Fruitcake.


What? I typed it. Maybe you want her to be able to read a lot

of

bad *****

so
she breaks down in agonizing guilt and begs to die.


You obviously want her dead, little lunatic.


I never said that.

Thanks for saying it in a public
newsgroup.


You typed what you thought I desired, which is NOT what I

typed.



My left eye was destroyed and had to be removed. My

right

eye was

badly damaged. My right hand was mangled beyond repair.

The

skin was

torn
off my shins and my leg shattered.


Looking more and more like what was done to the fetuses.


Yeah, all you care about is the Holy Fetus, and to hell

with

the

rest of

us
who had the luck to be born.


The rest of us? Grow a brain.


You grew one and have refused to use it for years. That's

why

you're the

joke
of your county.

The blast tore a hole in my abdomen so that about ten

(10)

inches

of
my intestines had to be removed. My eardrum was ruptured

and

required

extensive surgery. As a result, I am now a nurse who is

unable

to

read,
write, or stand for long periods of time. Instead of

caring

for


others,
others now have to care for me.


Doesn't she wish she was dead now?


No, and I suspect part of her refusal to do so is to anger

psychotic

bastards like you who have the gall to claim you're

pro-life.


Me , angry? LOL!!!!!!! I see a wounded woman who assisted

in

abortions

acting as if she somehow qualifies for compassion.


She qualifies for it,


Your standard says so?


Yours say she doesn't.


You read that where?


Just above. If it's not what you meant, you didn't do a good job

of

expressing yourself.


So much for being pro-life.


Pro-life to the point of not killing other people is a good thing.


I agree - not killing other people is a good thing. But, that

still

doesn't explain why you and your ilk support abortion clinic

bombers.


Support?
Do you mean with $$?


You're either really stupid or a good actor...

Support?
How do I support abortion clinic bombers?








because she was doing nothing to justify what was done
to her.


How do you know?


So, your standard says she did do something to justify what was

done to

her?


Does it?
Did I write a standard somewhere to make you think that way?


I'm sorry. I guess you didn't understand what the question mark at

the

end of my sentence meant. I was asking a question, not making a
statement. Perhaps you could answer the question now.


What standard are you referring to?
If you knew my standards would you need to ask?


I asked because it seems YOU are confused about your own standards...

I am not confused here.
The confusion comes from the totaly unqualified abortion legality.
The people who are confused are the people who have a child in utero who
live in a nation that says it's ok to have your own child aborted. Unloving
governments create confusion and bitterness amongst their people.







You're lionizing a gutless coward named Eric Rudolph who is

anything

but a hero.


Lioniizing?
How did he stay free of the entire US law enforcement regime

for

five

years?

Because he was a coward who was hiding anywhere he could.


Was he hiding from anyone who was NOT chasing him?


No, idiot,


I am an idiot because I know a man did not want to be captured?


No, because you asked that stupid question above. Who in their right
mind would actually hide from anyone who was NOT chasing them? Sheesh.

You didn't think to ask that question of yourself and think about human
behavior?
Paul Hill didn't run.
He was executed later.
Vindictive Pro-Choice assholes had him killed.




he was hiding from law enforcement who was chasing him.


You typd it. "chasing him"
Why would law enforceent personnel chase down a US Citizsen who had

bombed

an abortion clinic?


I can't believe you actually asked that question.

No answer, huh?

You really are
stupid.

*****.
Why are clinics bombed then?
I am NOT the stupid person here.
OBVIOUSLY!

.

He
was on the top 10 most wanted list.


LOL!!!!!!!
La dee da.
What a joke.
Top ten list?


Then you have no objection to having you name put on it?

The joke is that Rudolph was somehow a top ten threat to the USA.
Lots of people are glad he bombed all those areas.
Lots of people are very much dissatisfied with the elitist, egregious
oligarchy's anti-social legalism.


Five long years, and nothing.
Hmmmmmmm.
Maybe there is a reason someone who bombed an abortion clinic was

not


captured for five years.


DUH!!! He was running and hiding from the law. I guess you think
criminals are stupid enough to go on about their lives as if

nothing

happened when they are on the top 10 most wanted list.


You would prefer that he had bombed every clinic in the USA?


Certianly not, dipshit.

You got investments in it?
LOL!!!!!!!

What the hell does this have to do with
anything I wrote above, moron? He was a wanted criminal, and somehow
you manage to think that he just continued to live his life without any
worries.

he avoided capture for how long, again, in case you forgot already?
Sure makes the whole thing look like a joke, huh?
And, what about 9/11?
The joke is NOT on pro-Life.
The joke is on the Pro-Choice legalism.
And, Pro-Lifers are not happy about a Pro-Choice ant-social policy causing
all this destruction and lack of peace in the USA.


LOL!!!!!!!


Yea, your question was pretty damn funny, in a sad sort of way.




Maybe they wil figure this woman isn;t worth saving like in

the

Shiavo

case.


Maybe the real people will figure you're not worth being

taken

seriously,
and you can spend the rest of your life completely

powerless.


Guess what? You read my post. Did anyone force you to read

it?


I chose to read it, numbnuts.


Yep, which is what you should realize about people who read

your

posts.


You couldn't force me to do anything.


Wouldn't want to really. I am for freedom.


LOL!!!!

Freedom NOT to transgress others.


Unless you want their legally protected medical records.


There you go trying to act as if I am agaist freedom in a case

where

sex

crimes are being investigated.


You are, so long as it continues to support your agenda of

attempting

to legislate your morality.


The law is already there.


Apparently, you think it's the only law, and by it's existence alone,
it allows people to violate other laws as well as people's rights.

LOL!!!!!!!!!
This is funny.
Really.
Laws are being violated by otehr laws already.
Who made those laws?
Stop acting as if I do not understand anything when the violators are in the
ABA.


What part of laws against sex crimes are you missing now?


Nothing, unfortunately, you continue to forget that there are other
laws that protect people's rights.

Laws are not not supposed to shield criminal activiies.


The law is already there.


DUH! So are the other laws that protect people's rights that you
continue to want violated.

What rights are being protected when sex crimes are being committed and an
AG wants to investigate them and the clnic refuses to comply with the
investigation?
Seems to me the law which is there to protect people against crimes is being
violated.
Seems to me wrongs are being protected, not rights.




By the way,
you never posted yours here.


No AG is requesting them, DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!


You were asked to post them to show that you are willing to do what

you

are demanding of others.


HAHHAHAHAHA!
You asking for them?


Put up of shut up, hypocrite.

No AG is requesting my records.
Go through the proper channels if you want to see my medical records.


In your usual hypocritical fashion, you ran
away from the request.


I am NOT hiding anything.


No one has yet to see your medical records, therefore you're hiding
them.

What a lie.


Yet, you are for hiding information on others who are suspected of

having

been involved in illegal acticties.


Of course, you played your little game of
stating that you didn't have "abortion records" when what I had
requested was your "medical recoreds". Long story short, you never
posted them, thereby proving that you aren't willing to do what you
demand of others.


A lie.


Looks like you're the liar, christian hypocrite.

Here's the snippet of the conversation where you did it (the link is
below if you want to see the whole thing):

ME: You're the one demanding that other's expose their medical records,
so
you should be the first and make an example of yourself.

YOU: LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU: Abortion records?
YOU: I have none of those.

The posting in which this conversation took place is at:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.abortion/msg/bf66a809ba1aed18

So, Johnny, it looks like you lied again.

There is no lie there on my part.

Are you going to run away
from this and continue denying that you did what I said you did?
Probably, since you don't deal with reality very well.

I have no abortion records.






I guess that means you are hiding
something and need to have all your possessions searched for
indications of criminal activity.


Not at all. No one wants my medical records because there is no

probable

cause or reasonable suspicion to request them in a sex crime

investigation.

It doesn't matter. According to your logic, since you won't turn

over

your medical records that is enough to suspect that you are

involved in

criminal activity and should be subject to having your possessions
searched.


*****.


It's your logic, deal with it.

How many times in an average day do you mistake apples for oranges?
Sure seems like an everyday occurrence with you.
I bet you go to Florida and think all those orange fruits are apples.
You stupid idiot.
You are about as smart as a pile of cowchips.

You've said it more than once that the
fact that they won't turn over the records is enough evidence to
suspect a crime has been committed.

Yes. Reasonable suspicion is developed when clinics refuse to turn over
requested information.
If no cirmes were committed then they should turn over the records.
If they were not in jeopardy then they would be willing to comply with the
request.
Maybe the clinic is involved in criminal activity itself.
I say this is ample reason to issue a warrant to seize the records.


Review the law


Already done. Obviously you haven't.

Obviously, you didn't.
You failed to observe the contradictions within it and to straighten it up
so that the law does not contradict itself.
You fail to observe the law such that no law protects a person from being
investigated in instances where illegal activity is suspected.


and see why my records are not being requested


But they are, I'm requesting that you prove you're not a hypocrite by
demanding of others what you won't do...

So, request them via legal means.
This is not the place for you to request my medical records.

and why the
abortion clinic records are beng requested.


They're called medical records, fucknut, and they are protected by
FEDERAL LAW.

So, how do you think you can obtain my medical records?
And, how do you think it is that medical records are NOT protected by any
law whatsoever when those records may contain evidence of criminal acts?





You'd be the first one screaming
that your rights were violated if law enforcement showed up at

your

house and then proceeded to tear it apart looking for evidence

of a

crime, without any probable cause.


Nice to know that isn't happenng.


But, according to your logic it should be.


You think apples are oranges?


It's your logic...deal with it.

You do NOT understand.



You refuse to provide your
medical records


When?
They were not requested of me.


I requested that you post them to prove that you're willing to do what
others demand of you.

Where is the request bearing legal force?
You have no authoirty to request my medical recoreds from me.

You've never done it, therefore you should be
suspected of committing a crime, at least according to your logic.

I posted my full abortion records already.
Here they are again:
See them?




and according to you, that is reason enough to suspect
that you are involved in criminal activities.


How so?
I am NOT resisting an investigation.


So what. Your records were requested, you refused to provide them.

Why do you lie so much?

I
then applied your logic which means I should suspect you of committing
a crime. It's your logic, deal with it.

You're way off base.



Therefore, according to
you, law enforcement should be able to search your personal

property

because you not providing your medical records is sufficient

probable

cause.


How so?
I am NOT resisiting an investigation.


See above. You really can't deal with having your own logic thrown
back at you.

I can.
There is no hypocrisy in what I am doing.


Remember, this is YOUR logic and you've been posting it in this
newsgroup for some time now.


How so?
I am NOT resisting an investigation.


Again, see above.

LOL!!!!!!!!







(Just
like you haven't been able to scam anyone into buying a

single

share of

IncomeASAP.com, which ought to tell you something.)

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com)

Houston,

Texas

www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05

Houston

Aeros)

LAST GAME: Houston 2, San Antonio 1 (April 10)
NEXT GAME: Friday, April 15 vs. Chicago, 7:35




.
User: "Pr0r3p"

Title: Re: Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin 16 Apr 2005 02:02:30 PM
Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113490724.600136.241800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113397013.243751.266900@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113334570.226607.240070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk3btw2czk.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwtr85un9.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:


"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d395p6$3ih$1@bolt.sonic.net...


[a lot dumped, because Cuckoo Wentzky can't be bothered to

pay

attention]


On that day I lost my friend, a police officer

providing

security

at
our clinic, and I nearly lost my own life.


Too bad she didn't die.


You're advocating terrorism, right there. Live with it.


I did nothing of the sort. Your LIE is only that, a lie.


Call 713 308-8000,


What is that numner to again?

then, and tell whoever answers how hurt your feelings are.
Be sure and tell them what -you- wrote to prompt my

response,

though.

That
might even teach you something.


They wouldn't have a problem with what I wrote. Maybe one or

two

of

them

would be surprised, but you know men and women are just

doing

what

they are

told to do, or they lose their job or they are demoted or

subject

to

a

negative evaluation.
I am not surprised at al by what I see going on, considering

the

legal

arrangement which produces all these phenomena.


Interesting, Johnny is bitching about people having their

rights

violated, all while wanting to have the rights of those he

hates

violated.


So, who am I hating now?


The same people you've always hated - pregnant women who want an
abortion.


Is there a reason NOT to hate them and/or the men who got them

pregnant?

Sure.


Why?
What reason is there not to hate irresponsible, consensual sex act

cowards?
I always said your agenda was based on hate. And now, in your very own
words, you prove me to be right.


If you can't figure out why, then you're more evil than I
suspected.


Tell me why they should NOT be hated.

Why should I waste my time trying to convince a Nazi like you not to
hate people? It would only serve as a lesson in futility.

You have shown me no reason whatsoever that people who use abortion

to

escape their created responsibility should not be hated.

Interesting. You claim to be all above love, but then demand to know
why you shouldn't hate. I'm starting to think you are the offspring of
a brother and sister.


By the way, in another posting you claimed not to hate them
- another lie.


You need to learn to read english and recognize the difference

between

statements and questions.

You claim to be about love and then ask for a reason not to hate.
You're a damn liar, plain and simple.



There you go with that 'hate' ploy again.
Just who am I hating?


See above.


I saw it, numbskull.


This time, read it.


Who am I hating then?

PREGNANT WOMEN WHO WANT ABORTIONS. Damn, you are one stupid *****.









[...]

Because of the ongoing investigation I can't talk

about

the

details

of
that day, but I can tell you what my life has been

like

since.

In the

last six and a half months, I've spent almost thirty

hours

on

an

operating table in nine different operations,


None of which killed her as killed all the fetuses that

were

surgically

aborted in the Clinic she was employed in during her

time

there.


...and you're whining because she lived? Some

"pro-lifer"

you

are.


I am pro-life to the point that I like to see those who

are

anti-life and

guilty, dead. I do not like hearing corrupt, anti-life

vessels

speak.


So it's okay to kill anyone you don't like?


That's your interpretation?


You said you want people who are anti-life and guilty dead.

There

is

no other interpretation.


Is the only way for people to be dead to kill them?


The usual pro-life stance would indicate a "yes" as the answer

to

that

question.


You dumbass.
Are you Pro-LIFE speaking for Pro-LIFE?


I'm speaking from past experience with freaks like you.


You seem to be speaking from a deceived mind which assumes wrongly

about

some persons.

No, you've makde it perfectly clear to everyone that you are nothing
but another pro-life freak who like hating women and thinks it's ok to
kill people you don't like.




That's why you and your ilk support bombing abortion clinics
- to kill the people you don't like.


LOL!!!!!!!!!
Who is dead and who is alive?


Just as I expected, you really do drool over the thought of killing
people you don't like.


Never saw that in what I wrote.

Of course not. You're blind to your own hatred. You claim to be all
about love but then demand reasons to not hate someone.

It isn't there.
You seem to be some lamebran coward who tries to make up lies about

other

people.

Nope, it's in black and white, and you wrote it. Too bad you can't
stand having your own stinking ***** exposed for what it is.

I see abortion clinic bombings as a manifestation of Roe V Wade being
repudiated by citizens who hate it very much.

And, you drool over them...

Doesn;t bother me in the slightest when it happens.

More hatred.

It is a social phenomenon brought on by legalized abortion ON DEMAND!
Show me one instance of abortion clinics being bombed before Roe V

Wade,

excluding California.

Why should we dismiss California? Because it would prove your *****
wrong, that's why.




LOL!!!!!!



I'm glad you're not going to be
allowed out of your county at all.

[...]

Now, my vision is too poor to read.


Good. We do not need her reading.


You don't decide that, Fruitcake.


What? I typed it. Maybe you want her to be able to read a

lot

of

bad *****

so
she breaks down in agonizing guilt and begs to die.


You obviously want her dead, little lunatic.


I never said that.

Thanks for saying it in a public
newsgroup.


You typed what you thought I desired, which is NOT what I

typed.



My left eye was destroyed and had to be removed. My

right

eye was

badly damaged. My right hand was mangled beyond

repair.

The

skin was

torn
off my shins and my leg shattered.


Looking more and more like what was done to the fetuses.


Yeah, all you care about is the Holy Fetus, and to hell

with

the

rest of

us
who had the luck to be born.


The rest of us? Grow a brain.


You grew one and have refused to use it for years. That's

why

you're the

joke
of your county.

The blast tore a hole in my abdomen so that about

ten

(10)

inches

of
my intestines had to be removed. My eardrum was

ruptured

and

required

extensive surgery. As a result, I am now a nurse who

is

unable

to

read,
write, or stand for long periods of time. Instead of

caring

for


others,
others now have to care for me.


Doesn't she wish she was dead now?


No, and I suspect part of her refusal to do so is to

anger

psychotic

bastards like you who have the gall to claim you're

pro-life.


Me , angry? LOL!!!!!!! I see a wounded woman who

assisted

in

abortions

acting as if she somehow qualifies for compassion.


She qualifies for it,


Your standard says so?


Yours say she doesn't.


You read that where?


Just above. If it's not what you meant, you didn't do a good

job

of

expressing yourself.


So much for being pro-life.


Pro-life to the point of not killing other people is a good

thing.


I agree - not killing other people is a good thing. But, that

still

doesn't explain why you and your ilk support abortion clinic

bombers.


Support?
Do you mean with $$?


You're either really stupid or a good actor...


Support?
How do I support abortion clinic bombers?

Hmmm...stupid or good actor? I'm going to put money on STUPID.









because she was doing nothing to justify what was done
to her.


How do you know?


So, your standard says she did do something to justify what

was

done to

her?


Does it?
Did I write a standard somewhere to make you think that way?


I'm sorry. I guess you didn't understand what the question mark

at

the

end of my sentence meant. I was asking a question, not making a
statement. Perhaps you could answer the question now.


What standard are you referring to?
If you knew my standards would you need to ask?


I asked because it seems YOU are confused about your own

standards...


I am not confused here.
The confusion comes from the totaly unqualified abortion legality.
The people who are confused are the people who have a child in utero

who

live in a nation that says it's ok to have your own child aborted.

Unloving

governments create confusion and bitterness amongst their people.

Ahhh, more unproven ***** from man who supports abortion clinic
bombings and holds an agenda of hatred. BIG SURPRISE!









You're lionizing a gutless coward named Eric Rudolph who

is

anything

but a hero.


Lioniizing?
How did he stay free of the entire US law enforcement regime

for

five

years?

Because he was a coward who was hiding anywhere he could.


Was he hiding from anyone who was NOT chasing him?


No, idiot,


I am an idiot because I know a man did not want to be captured?


No, because you asked that stupid question above. Who in their

right

mind would actually hide from anyone who was NOT chasing them?

Sheesh.


You didn't think to ask that question of yourself and think about

human

behavior?
Paul Hill didn't run.
He was executed later.
Vindictive Pro-Choice assholes had him killed.

That's it, let everyone see your hypocrisy.





he was hiding from law enforcement who was chasing him.


You typd it. "chasing him"
Why would law enforceent personnel chase down a US Citizsen who

had

bombed

an abortion clinic?


I can't believe you actually asked that question.


No answer, huh?

I think law enforcement should chase any criminal. There, that answers
your qustion. Of course, if the killing is done in the name of your
agenda, you believe the perpetrator should get off scott free.


You really are
stupid.


*****.
Why are clinics bombed then?

Because prolife fruitcakes like you think it's ok to kill people in the
name of their god or their agenda.

I am NOT the stupid person here.
OBVIOUSLY!

Supporting abortion clinic bombings is stupid, therefore, you are
stupid.


.

He
was on the top 10 most wanted list.


LOL!!!!!!!
La dee da.
What a joke.
Top ten list?


Then you have no objection to having you name put on it?


The joke is that Rudolph was somehow a top ten threat to the USA.
Lots of people are glad he bombed all those areas.
Lots of people are very much dissatisfied with the elitist, egregious
oligarchy's anti-social legalism.

You didn't answer the question. Another BIG SURPRISE.


Five long years, and nothing.
Hmmmmmmm.
Maybe there is a reason someone who bombed an abortion clinic

was

not


captured for five years.


DUH!!! He was running and hiding from the law. I guess you

think

criminals are stupid enough to go on about their lives as if

nothing

happened when they are on the top 10 most wanted list.


You would prefer that he had bombed every clinic in the USA?


Certianly not, dipshit.


You got investments in it?
LOL!!!!!!!

Nice reponse. Too bad it shows your true hatred of women in need of
those services as well as your support of abortion clinic bombings,
fucknut.


What the hell does this have to do with
anything I wrote above, moron? He was a wanted criminal, and

somehow

you manage to think that he just continued to live his life without

any

worries.


he avoided capture for how long, again, in case you forgot already?

You act like he's the only criminal that's ever hidden from law
enforcement that long. I guess you would think nothing less of your
hero.

Sure makes the whole thing look like a joke, huh?
And, what about 9/11?

What, are you going to try and blame 9/11 on the abortion industry now?
It would only be one more thing on the list of unsupported claims that
you've made.

The joke is NOT on pro-Life.

It most certianly is, and you've proven it.

The joke is on the Pro-Choice legalism.
And, Pro-Lifers are not happy about a Pro-Choice ant-social policy

causing

all this destruction and lack of peace in the USA.

So, that's all the fault of the pro-choicers, eh? You really are a
paranoid freak.



LOL!!!!!!!


Yea, your question was pretty damn funny, in a sad sort of way.




Maybe they wil figure this woman isn;t worth saving like

in

the

Shiavo

case.


Maybe the real people will figure you're not worth being

taken

seriously,
and you can spend the rest of your life completely

powerless.


Guess what? You read my post. Did anyone force you to

read

it?


I chose to read it, numbnuts.


Yep, which is what you should realize about people who read

your

posts.


You couldn't force me to do anything.


Wouldn't want to really. I am for freedom.


LOL!!!!

Freedom NOT to transgress others.


Unless you want their legally protected medical records.


There you go trying to act as if I am agaist freedom in a case

where

sex

crimes are being investigated.


You are, so long as it continues to support your agenda of

attempting

to legislate your morality.


The law is already there.


Apparently, you think it's the only law, and by it's existence

alone,

it allows people to violate other laws as well as people's rights.


LOL!!!!!!!!!
This is funny.
Really.
Laws are being violated by otehr laws already.

Learn to read, asswipe, that's not what I said.

Who made those laws?
Stop acting as if I do not understand anything when the violators are

in the

ABA.

Stop acting like you have evidence to prove there are violaters.



What part of laws against sex crimes are you missing now?


Nothing, unfortunately, you continue to forget that there are other
laws that protect people's rights.


Laws are not not supposed to shield criminal activiies.

"You have the right not to incriminate yourself".
Oops, there you go looking like as ***** again.



The law is already there.


DUH! So are the other laws that protect people's rights that you
continue to want violated.


What rights are being protected when sex crimes are being committed

and an

AG wants to investigate them and the clnic refuses to comply with the
investigation?
Seems to me the law which is there to protect people against crimes

is being

violated.
Seems to me wrongs are being protected, not rights.

You really hate it that federal law protects medical records and you
can't do a damn thing about it.





By the way,
you never posted yours here.


No AG is requesting them, DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!


You were asked to post them to show that you are willing to do

what

you

are demanding of others.


HAHHAHAHAHA!
You asking for them?


Put up of shut up, hypocrite.


No AG is requesting my records.
Go through the proper channels if you want to see my medical records.

Just as I expected, you're a hypocrite.



In your usual hypocritical fashion, you ran
away from the request.


I am NOT hiding anything.


No one has yet to see your medical records, therefore you're hiding
them.


What a lie.

Where are they then?



Yet, you are for hiding information on others who are suspected of

having

been involved in illegal acticties.


Of course, you played your little game of
stating that you didn't have "abortion records" when what I had
requested was your "medical recoreds". Long story short, you

never

posted them, thereby proving that you aren't willing to do what

you

demand of others.


A lie.


Looks like you're the liar, christian hypocrite.

Here's the snippet of the conversation where you did it (the link

is

below if you want to see the whole thing):

ME: You're the one demanding that other's expose their medical

records,

so
you should be the first and make an example of yourself.

YOU: LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU: Abortion records?
YOU: I have none of those.

The posting in which this conversation took place is at:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.abortion/msg/bf66a809ba1aed18


So, Johnny, it looks like you lied again.


There is no lie there on my part.

It's right there in black and white.
The fact that you would deny it when it's right in front of your face
speaks mountians about your integrity.


Are you going to run away
from this and continue denying that you did what I said you did?
Probably, since you don't deal with reality very well.


I have no abortion records.

No one asked you for abortion records, *****. You were asked for
your medical records. You must enjoy playing the dumbshit, you sure do
it enough.







I guess that means you are hiding
something and need to have all your possessions searched for
indications of criminal activity.


Not at all. No one wants my medical records because there is no

probable

cause or reasonable suspicion to request them in a sex crime

investigation.

It doesn't matter. According to your logic, since you won't

turn

over

your medical records that is enough to suspect that you are

involved in

criminal activity and should be subject to having your

possessions

searched.


*****.


It's your logic, deal with it.


How many times in an average day do you mistake apples for oranges?
Sure seems like an everyday occurrence with you.
I bet you go to Florida and think all those orange fruits are apples.
You stupid idiot.
You are about as smart as a pile of cowchips.

It's your logic, deal with it fruitcake.


You've said it more than once that the
fact that they won't turn over the records is enough evidence to
suspect a crime has been committed.


Yes. Reasonable suspicion is developed when clinics refuse to turn

over

requested information.

I requested you to turn over your medical records, you didn't.
Therefore, reasonable suspicion has developed.

If no cirmes were committed then they should turn over the records.

I see you're still demanding that federal law be violated.

If they were not in jeopardy then they would be willing to comply

with the

request.

Unless federal law requires that they not comply, fucknut.

Maybe the clinic is involved in criminal activity itself.
I say this is ample reason to issue a warrant to seize the records.

Nope. You have to have probable cause before getting a warrant. Any
judge worth his weight would laugh at a law enforcement office who
requests a warrant because a clinic won't violate federal law by
handing over medical records.



Review the law


Already done. Obviously you haven't.


Obviously, you didn't.
You failed to observe the contradictions within it and to straighten

it up

so that the law does not contradict itself.
You fail to observe the law such that no law protects a person from

being

investigated in instances where illegal activity is suspected.

I don't have a problem with anyone being investigated so long as it's
done LAWFULLY. Demanding that medical records be handed over is in
violation of federal law. Get the ***** over it.



and see why my records are not being requested


But they are, I'm requesting that you prove you're not a hypocrite

by

demanding of others what you won't do...


So, request them via legal means.

You want the medical records of abortion clinics turn over against
federal law, why the big concern when it comes to your medical records,
hypocrite?

This is not the place for you to request my medical records.

and why the
abortion clinic records are beng requested.


They're called medical records, fucknut, and they are protected by
FEDERAL LAW.


So, how do you think you can obtain my medical records?
And, how do you think it is that medical records are NOT protected by

any

law whatsoever when those records may contain evidence of criminal

acts?
Apparently, you aren't familiar with the privacy laws.






You'd be the first one screaming
that your rights were violated if law enforcement showed up

at

your

house and then proceeded to tear it apart looking for

evidence

of a

crime, without any probable cause.


Nice to know that isn't happenng.


But, according to your logic it should be.


You think apples are oranges?


It's your logic...deal with it.


You do NOT understand.

It's your logic...deal with it.




You refuse to provide your
medical records


When?
They were not requested of me.


I requested that you post them to prove that you're willing to do

what

others demand of you.


Where is the request bearing legal force?
You have no authoirty to request my medical recoreds from me.

Run away, hypocrite.


You've never done it, therefore you should be
suspected of committing a crime, at least according to your logic.


I posted my full abortion records already.

I asked for "medical records", retard. Apparently, you can't read.

Here they are again:

See them?

That's it, keep showing the world what a hypocritical ***** you are.






and according to you, that is reason enough to suspect
that you are involved in criminal activities.


How so?
I am NOT resisting an investigation.


So what. Your records were requested, you refused to provide them.


Why do you lie so much?

So, where did provide the MEDICAL RECORDS that I requested. Don't play
your stupid little game of posting "abortion records" - I asked for
MEDICAL RECORDS.
Show where you posted your MEDICAL RECORDS. If you can't, then you
admit to being a liar by saying you did post your medical records.



I
then applied your logic which means I should suspect you of

committing

a crime. It's your logic, deal with it.


You're way off base.

Funny how you don't like you own logic used against you.



Therefore, according to
you, law enforcement should be able to search your personal

property

because you not providing your medical records is sufficient

probable

cause.


How so?
I am NOT resisiting an investigation.


See above. You really can't deal with having your own logic thrown
back at you.


I can.
There is no hypocrisy in what I am doing.

Sure there is, you just keep showing the world what a hypocrite you
are.



Remember, this is YOUR logic and you've been posting it in this
newsgroup for some time now.


How so?
I am NOT resisting an investigation.


Again, see above.


LOL!!!!!!!!







(Just
like you haven't been able to scam anyone into buying a

single

share of

IncomeASAP.com, which ought to tell you something.)

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com)

Houston,

Texas

www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05

Houston

Aeros)

LAST GAME: Houston 2, San Antonio 1 (April

10)

NEXT GAME: Friday, April 15 vs. Chicago,

7:35




.

User: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marie-=C9lise_Martines?="

Title: Re: Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin 14 Apr 2005 04:41:07 PM
On 2005-04-14 11:37:13 -0700, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> said:


"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113490724.600136.241800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113397013.243751.266900@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113334570.226607.240070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk3btw2czk.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwtr85un9.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:


"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d395p6$3ih$1@bolt.sonic.net...


[a lot dumped, because Cuckoo Wentzky can't be bothered to

pay

attention]


On that day I lost my friend, a police officer

providing

security

at
our clinic, and I nearly lost my own life.


Too bad she didn't die.


You're advocating terrorism, right there. Live with it.


I did nothing of the sort. Your LIE is only that, a lie.


Call 713 308-8000,


What is that numner to again?

then, and tell whoever answers how hurt your feelings are.
Be sure and tell them what -you- wrote to prompt my response,

though.

That
might even teach you something.


They wouldn't have a problem with what I wrote. Maybe one or

two

of

them

would be surprised, but you know men and women are just doing

what

they are

told to do, or they lose their job or they are demoted or

subject

to

a

negative evaluation.
I am not surprised at al by what I see going on, considering

the

legal

arrangement which produces all these phenomena.


Interesting, Johnny is bitching about people having their rights
violated, all while wanting to have the rights of those he hates
violated.


So, who am I hating now?


The same people you've always hated - pregnant women who want an
abortion.


Is there a reason NOT to hate them and/or the men who got them

pregnant?

Sure.


Why?
What reason is there not to hate irresponsible, consensual sex act cowards?

Do you need reason to not hate?


If you can't figure out why, then you're more evil than I
suspected.


Tell me why they should NOT be hated.

Is that your starting point? If there is no reason not to hate
someone, you hate them?

You have shown me no reason whatsoever that people who use abortion to
escape their created responsibility should not be hated.

It sounds like you enjoy hating people.


By the way, in another posting you claimed not to hate them
- another lie.


You need to learn to read english and recognize the difference between
statements and questions.


There you go with that 'hate' ploy again.
Just who am I hating?


See above.


I saw it, numbskull.


This time, read it.


Who am I hating then?








[...]

Because of the ongoing investigation I can't talk

about

the

details

of
that day, but I can tell you what my life has been like

since.

In the

last six and a half months, I've spent almost thirty

hours

on

an

operating table in nine different operations,


None of which killed her as killed all the fetuses that

were

surgically

aborted in the Clinic she was employed in during her time

there.


...and you're whining because she lived? Some "pro-lifer"

you

are.


I am pro-life to the point that I like to see those who are

anti-life and

guilty, dead. I do not like hearing corrupt, anti-life

vessels

speak.


So it's okay to kill anyone you don't like?


That's your interpretation?


You said you want people who are anti-life and guilty dead.

There

is

no other interpretation.


Is the only way for people to be dead to kill them?


The usual pro-life stance would indicate a "yes" as the answer to

that

question.


You dumbass.
Are you Pro-LIFE speaking for Pro-LIFE?


I'm speaking from past experience with freaks like you.


You seem to be speaking from a deceived mind which assumes wrongly
about some persons.



That's why you and your ilk support bombing abortion clinics
- to kill the people you don't like.


LOL!!!!!!!!!
Who is dead and who is alive?


Just as I expected, you really do drool over the thought of killing
people you don't like.


Never saw that in what I wrote.
It isn't there.
You seem to be some lamebran coward who tries to make up lies about
other people.
I see abortion clinic bombings as a manifestation of Roe V Wade being
repudiated by citizens who hate it very much.
Doesn;t bother me in the slightest when it happens.
It is a social phenomenon brought on by legalized abortion ON DEMAND!
Show me one instance of abortion clinics being bombed before Roe V
Wade, excluding California.



LOL!!!!!!



I'm glad you're not going to be
allowed out of your county at all.

[...]

Now, my vision is too poor to read.


Good. We do not need her reading.


You don't decide that, Fruitcake.


What? I typed it. Maybe you want her to be able to read a lot

of

bad *****

so
she breaks down in agonizing guilt and begs to die.


You obviously want her dead, little lunatic.


I never said that.

Thanks for saying it in a public
newsgroup.


You typed what you thought I desired, which is NOT what I

typed.



My left eye was destroyed and had to be removed. My

right

eye was

badly damaged. My right hand was mangled beyond repair.

The

skin was

torn
off my shins and my leg shattered.


Looking more and more like what was done to the fetuses.


Yeah, all you care about is the Holy Fetus, and to hell

with

the

rest of

us
who had the luck to be born.


The rest of us? Grow a brain.


You grew one and have refused to use it for years. That's

why

you're the

joke
of your county.

The blast tore a hole in my abdomen so that about ten

(10)

inches

of
my intestines had to be removed. My eardrum was ruptured

and

required

extensive surgery. As a result, I am now a nurse who is

unable

to

read,
write, or stand for long periods of time. Instead of

caring

for


others,
others now have to care for me.


Doesn't she wish she was dead now?


No, and I suspect part of her refusal to do so is to anger

psychotic

bastards like you who have the gall to claim you're

pro-life.


Me , angry? LOL!!!!!!! I see a wounded woman who assisted

in

abortions

acting as if she somehow qualifies for compassion.


She qualifies for it,


Your standard says so?


Yours say she doesn't.


You read that where?


Just above. If it's not what you meant, you didn't do a good job

of

expressing yourself.


So much for being pro-life.


Pro-life to the point of not killing other people is a good thing.


I agree - not killing other people is a good thing. But, that

still

doesn't explain why you and your ilk support abortion clinic

bombers.


Support?
Do you mean with $$?


You're either really stupid or a good actor...


Support?
How do I support abortion clinic bombers?








because she was doing nothing to justify what was done
to her.


How do you know?


So, your standard says she did do something to justify what was

done to

her?


Does it?
Did I write a standard somewhere to make you think that way?


I'm sorry. I guess you didn't understand what the question mark at

the

end of my sentence meant. I was asking a question, not making a
statement. Perhaps you could answer the question now.


What standard are you referring to?
If you knew my standards would you need to ask?


I asked because it seems YOU are confused about your own standards...


I am not confused here.
The confusion comes from the totaly unqualified abortion legality.
The people who are confused are the people who have a child in utero
who live in a nation that says it's ok to have your own child aborted.
Unloving governments create confusion and bitterness amongst their
people.








You're lionizing a gutless coward named Eric Rudolph who is

anything

but a hero.


Lioniizing?
How did he stay free of the entire US law enforcement regime

for

five

years?

Because he was a coward who was hiding anywhere he could.


Was he hiding from anyone who was NOT chasing him?


No, idiot,


I am an idiot because I know a man did not want to be captured?


No, because you asked that stupid question above. Who in their right
mind would actually hide from anyone who was NOT chasing them? Sheesh.


You didn't think to ask that question of yourself and think about human
behavior?
Paul Hill didn't run.
He was executed later.
Vindictive Pro-Choice assholes had him killed.




he was hiding from law enforcement who was chasing him.


You typd it. "chasing him"
Why would law enforceent personnel chase down a US Citizsen who had

bombed

an abortion clinic?


I can't believe you actually asked that question.


No answer, huh?

You really are
stupid.


*****.
Why are clinics bombed then?
I am NOT the stupid person here.
OBVIOUSLY!

.

He
was on the top 10 most wanted list.


LOL!!!!!!!
La dee da.
What a joke.
Top ten list?


Then you have no objection to having you name put on it?


The joke is that Rudolph was somehow a top ten threat to the USA.
Lots of people are glad he bombed all those areas.
Lots of people are very much dissatisfied with the elitist, egregious
oligarchy's anti-social legalism.


Five long years, and nothing.
Hmmmmmmm.
Maybe there is a reason someone who bombed an abortion clinic was

not


captured for five years.


DUH!!! He was running and hiding from the law. I guess you think
criminals are stupid enough to go on about their lives as if

nothing

happened when they are on the top 10 most wanted list.


You would prefer that he had bombed every clinic in the USA?


Certianly not, dipshit.


You got investments in it?
LOL!!!!!!!

What the hell does this have to do with
anything I wrote above, moron? He was a wanted criminal, and somehow
you manage to think that he just continued to live his life without any
worries.


he avoided capture for how long, again, in case you forgot already?
Sure makes the whole thing look like a joke, huh?
And, what about 9/11?
The joke is NOT on pro-Life.
The joke is on the Pro-Choice legalism.
And, Pro-Lifers are not happy about a Pro-Choice ant-social policy
causing all this destruction and lack of peace in the USA.


LOL!!!!!!!


Yea, your question was pretty damn funny, in a sad sort of way.




Maybe they wil figure this woman isn;t worth saving like in

the

Shiavo

case.


Maybe the real people will figure you're not worth being

taken

seriously,
and you can spend the rest of your life completely

powerless.


Guess what? You read my post. Did anyone force you to read

it?


I chose to read it, numbnuts.


Yep, which is what you should realize about people who read

your

posts.


You couldn't force me to do anything.


Wouldn't want to really. I am for freedom.


LOL!!!!

Freedom NOT to transgress others.


Unless you want their legally protected medical records.


There you go trying to act as if I am agaist freedom in a case

where

sex

crimes are being investigated.


You are, so long as it continues to support your agenda of

attempting

to legislate your morality.


The law is already there.


Apparently, you think it's the only law, and by it's existence alone,
it allows people to violate other laws as well as people's rights.


LOL!!!!!!!!!
This is funny.
Really.
Laws are being violated by otehr laws already.
Who made those laws?
Stop acting as if I do not understand anything when the violators are
in the ABA.


What part of laws against sex crimes are you missing now?


Nothing, unfortunately, you continue to forget that there are other
laws that protect people's rights.


Laws are not not supposed to shield criminal activiies.


The law is already there.


DUH! So are the other laws that protect people's rights that you
continue to want violated.


What rights are being protected when sex crimes are being committed and
an AG wants to investigate them and the clnic refuses to comply with
the investigation?
Seems to me the law which is there to protect people against crimes is
being violated.
Seems to me wrongs are being protected, not rights.




By the way,
you never posted yours here.


No AG is requesting them, DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!


You were asked to post them to show that you are willing to do what

you

are demanding of others.


HAHHAHAHAHA!
You asking for them?


Put up of shut up, hypocrite.


No AG is requesting my records.
Go through the proper channels if you want to see my medical records.


In your usual hypocritical fashion, you ran
away from the request.


I am NOT hiding anything.


No one has yet to see your medical records, therefore you're hiding
them.


What a lie.


Yet, you are for hiding information on others who are suspected of

having

been involved in illegal acticties.


Of course, you played your little game of
stating that you didn't have "abortion records" when what I had
requested was your "medical recoreds". Long story short, you never
posted them, thereby proving that you aren't willing to do what you
demand of others.


A lie.


Looks like you're the liar, christian hypocrite.

Here's the snippet of the conversation where you did it (the link is
below if you want to see the whole thing):

ME: You're the one demanding that other's expose their medical records,
so
you should be the first and make an example of yourself.

YOU: LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU: Abortion records?
YOU: I have none of those.

The posting in which this conversation took place is at:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.abortion/msg/bf66a809ba1aed18

So, Johnny, it looks like you lied again.


There is no lie there on my part.

Are you going to run away
from this and continue denying that you did what I said you did?
Probably, since you don't deal with reality very well.


I have no abortion records.






I guess that means you are hiding
something and need to have all your possessions searched for
indications of criminal activity.


Not at all. No one wants my medical records because there is no

probable

cause or reasonable suspicion to request them in a sex crime

investigation.

It doesn't matter. According to your logic, since you won't turn

over

your medical records that is enough to suspect that you are

involved in

criminal activity and should be subject to having your possessions
searched.


*****.


It's your logic, deal with it.


How many times in an average day do you mistake apples for oranges?
Sure seems like an everyday occurrence with you.
I bet you go to Florida and think all those orange fruits are apples.
You stupid idiot.
You are about as smart as a pile of cowchips.

You've said it more than once that the
fact that they won't turn over the records is enough evidence to
suspect a crime has been committed.


Yes. Reasonable suspicion is developed when clinics refuse to turn over
requested information.
If no cirmes were committed then they should turn over the records.
If they were not in jeopardy then they would be willing to comply with
the request.
Maybe the clinic is involved in criminal activity itself.
I say this is ample reason to issue a warrant to seize the records.


Review the law


Already done. Obviously you haven't.


Obviously, you didn't.
You failed to observe the contradictions within it and to straighten it
up so that the law does not contradict itself.
You fail to observe the law such that no law protects a person from
being investigated in instances where illegal activity is suspected.


and see why my records are not being requested


But they are, I'm requesting that you prove you're not a hypocrite by
demanding of others what you won't do...


So, request them via legal means.
This is not the place for you to request my medical records.

and why the
abortion clinic records are beng requested.


They're called medical records, fucknut, and they are protected by
FEDERAL LAW.


So, how do you think you can obtain my medical records?
And, how do you think it is that medical records are NOT protected by
any law whatsoever when those records may contain evidence of criminal
acts?





You'd be the first one screaming
that your rights were violated if law enforcement showed up at

your

house and then proceeded to tear it apart looking for evidence

of a

crime, without any probable cause.


Nice to know that isn't happenng.


But, according to your logic it should be.


You think apples are oranges?


It's your logic...deal with it.


You do NOT understand.



You refuse to provide your
medical records


When?
They were not requested of me.


I requested that you post them to prove that you're willing to do what
others demand of you.


Where is the request bearing legal force?
You have no authoirty to request my medical recoreds from me.

You've never done it, therefore you should be
suspected of committing a crime, at least according to your logic.


I posted my full abortion records already.
Here they are again:

See them?





and according to you, that is reason enough to suspect
that you are involved in criminal activities.


How so?
I am NOT resisting an investigation.


So what. Your records were requested, you refused to provide them.


Why do you lie so much?


I
then applied your logic which means I should suspect you of committing
a crime. It's your logic, deal with it.


You're way off base.



Therefore, according to
you, law enforcement should be able to search your personal

property

because you not providing your medical records is sufficient

probable

cause.


How so?
I am NOT resisiting an investigation.


See above. You really can't deal with having your own logic thrown
back at you.


I can.
There is no hypocrisy in what I am doing.


Remember, this is YOUR logic and you've been posting it in this
newsgroup for some time now.


How so?
I am NOT resisting an investigation.


Again, see above.


LOL!!!!!!!!







(Just
like you haven't been able to scam anyone into buying a

single

share of

IncomeASAP.com, which ought to tell you something.)

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com)

Houston,

Texas

www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05

Houston

Aeros)

LAST GAME: Houston 2, San Antonio 1 (April 10)
NEXT GAME: Friday, April 15 vs. Chicago, 7:35

.
User: "Johnny"

Title: Re: Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin 14 Apr 2005 04:47:33 PM
"Marie-Élise Martines" <martines@students.ucsd.edu> wrote in message
news:2005041414410793932%martines@studentsucsdedu...

On 2005-04-14 11:37:13 -0700, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> said:


"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113490724.600136.241800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113397013.243751.266900@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113334570.226607.240070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk3btw2czk.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwtr85un9.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:


"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d395p6$3ih$1@bolt.sonic.net...


[a lot dumped, because Cuckoo Wentzky can't be bothered to

pay

attention]


On that day I lost my friend, a police officer

providing

security

at
our clinic, and I nearly lost my own life.


Too bad she didn't die.


You're advocating terrorism, right there. Live with it.


I did nothing of the sort. Your LIE is only that, a lie.


Call 713 308-8000,


What is that numner to again?

then, and tell whoever answers how hurt your feelings are.
Be sure and tell them what -you- wrote to prompt my response,

though.

That
might even teach you something.


They wouldn't have a problem with what I wrote. Maybe one or

two

of

them

would be surprised, but you know men and women are just doing

what

they are

told to do, or they lose their job or they are demoted or

subject

to

a

negative evaluation.
I am not surprised at al by what I see going on, considering

the

legal

arrangement which produces all these phenomena.


Interesting, Johnny is bitching about people having their rights
violated, all while wanting to have the rights of those he hates
violated.


So, who am I hating now?


The same people you've always hated - pregnant women who want an
abortion.


Is there a reason NOT to hate them and/or the men who got them

pregnant?

Sure.


Why?
What reason is there not to hate irresponsible, consensual sex act
cowards?


Do you need reason to not hate?

Give me a reason that irresponsible, consensual sex act cowards (people who
have consensual sex and then procure abortions for their personal benefit)
should NOT be hated.
Go ahead.
I am waiting.



If you can't figure out why, then you're more evil than I
suspected.


Tell me why they should NOT be hated.


Is that your starting point? If there is no reason not to hate someone,
you hate them?

Give me a reason NOT to hate them, and then I will see if it is good enough
reason.


You have shown me no reason whatsoever that people who use abortion to
escape their created responsibility should not be hated.


It sounds like you enjoy hating people.

Does it?
Seems to be I do NOT enjoy hating people.
Can you give me a reason not to hate those who show me they are undeserving
of love?
[snip]
.
User: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marie-=C9lise_Martines?="

Title: Re: Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin 14 Apr 2005 05:24:50 PM
On 2005-04-14 14:47:33 -0700, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> said:


"Marie-Élise Martines" <martines@students.ucsd.edu> wrote in message
news:2005041414410793932%martines@studentsucsdedu...

On 2005-04-14 11:37:13 -0700, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> said:


"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113490724.600136.241800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113397013.243751.266900@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113334570.226607.240070@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...


Johnny wrote:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk3btw2czk.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwtr85un9.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:


"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d395p6$3ih$1@bolt.sonic.net...


[a lot dumped, because Cuckoo Wentzky can't be bothered to

pay

attention]


On that day I lost my friend, a police officer

providing

security

at
our clinic, and I nearly lost my own life.


Too bad she didn't die.


You're advocating terrorism, right there. Live with it.


I did nothing of the sort. Your LIE is only that, a lie.


Call 713 308-8000,


What is that numner to again?

then, and tell whoever answers how hurt your feelings are.
Be sure and tell them what -you- wrote to prompt my response,

though.

That
might even teach you something.


They wouldn't have a problem with what I wrote. Maybe one or

two

of

them

would be surprised, but you know men and women are just doing

what

they are

told to do, or they lose their job or they are demoted or

subject

to

a

negative evaluation.
I am not surprised at al by what I see going on, considering

the

legal

arrangement which produces all these phenomena.


Interesting, Johnny is bitching about people having their rights
violated, all while wanting to have the rights of those he hates
violated.


So, who am I hating now?


The same people you've always hated - pregnant women who want an
abortion.


Is there a reason NOT to hate them and/or the men who got them

pregnant?

Sure.


Why?
What reason is there not to hate irresponsible, consensual sex act cowards?


Do you need reason to not hate?


Give me a reason that irresponsible, consensual sex act cowards (people
who have consensual sex and then procure abortions for their personal
benefit) should NOT be hated.
Go ahead.
I am waiting.

I don't think like that. Sorry. I don't begin by hating someone. You
must be a Bush supporter.




If you can't figure out why, then you're more evil than I
suspected.


Tell me why they should NOT be hated.


Is that your starting point? If there is no reason not to hate
someone, you hate them?


Give me a reason NOT to hate them, and then I will see if it is good
enough reason.

Because it diminishes who you are when you hate someone.



You have shown me no reason whatsoever that people who use abortion to
escape their created responsibility should not be hated.


It sounds like you enjoy hating people.


Does it?

Yes

Seems to be I do NOT enjoy hating people.
Can you give me a reason not to hate those who show me they are
undeserving of love?

No - go ahead. Hate. It seems to be part of who you are.

[snip]

Everytime I come out here you whacks on the right are cutting what
people say. Isn't that how Hitler started?
.
User: "Johnny"

Title: Re: Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin 14 Apr 2005 06:15:26 PM
"Marie-Élise Martines" <martines@students.ucsd.edu> wrote in message
news:2005041415245075249%martines@studentsucsdedu...

On 2005-04-14 14:47:33 -0700, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:


Give me a reason that irresponsible, consensual sex act cowards (people
who have consensual sex and then procure abortions for their personal
benefit) should NOT be hated.
Go ahead.
I am waiting.


I don't think like that. Sorry. I don't begin by hating someone. You
must be a Bush supporter.

Who began the hate?
Think about the abortion that fails to love the child.

Give me a reason NOT to hate them, and then I will see if it is good
enough reason.


Because it diminishes who you are when you hate someone.

So, you are diminished by hating the conceived children.

Seems to be I do NOT enjoy hating people.
Can you give me a reason not to hate those who show me they are
undeserving of love?


No - go ahead. Hate. It seems to be part of who you are.

Who hated first?
Who failed to love another person in this abortion on demand scenario?
What goes around comes around, remember?

[snip]


Everytime I come out here you whacks on the right are cutting what people
say. Isn't that how Hitler started?

You had nothing further in your reply.
I am replying to you, not to previous messages.
.
User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey"

Title: Re: Terrorist Eric Rudolph takes a Plea Bargin 14 Apr 2005 10:23:41 PM
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

"Marie-Élise Martines" <martines@students.ucsd.edu> wrote in message
news:2005041415245075249%martines@studentsucsdedu...

On 2005-04-14 14:47:33 -0700, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:

Give me a reason that irresponsible, consensual sex act cowards (people
who have consensual sex and then procure abortions for their personal
benefit) should NOT be hated.
Go ahead.
I am waiting.

I don't think like that. Sorry. I don't begin by hating someone. You
must be a Bush supporter.

Who began the hate?

Why don't you tell us? You're the certified loon, after all.

Think about the abortion that fails to love the child.

Abortion is a procedure, so it can't love, hate, or feel anything. People
have that ability. (In other words, with your "logic", you could claim
abortions were people...if your neighbors aren't already aware of your
psychosis, that ought to convince them.)

Give me a reason NOT to hate them, and then I will see if it is good
enough reason.

Because it diminishes who you are when you hate someone.

So, you are diminished by hating the conceived children.

Where's the proof of her hate? (Your imagination does NOT count.)

Seems to be I do NOT enjoy hating people.
Can you give me a reason not to hate those who show me they are
undeserving of love?

No - go ahead. Hate. It seems to be part of who you are.

Who hated first?

You did, dumbass.

Who f