| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Osprey" |
| Date: |
21 Apr 2007 12:50:09 AM |
| Object: |
test for Yang |
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
.
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
21 Apr 2007 01:08:16 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
21 Apr 2007 01:15:17 AM |
|
|
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
22 Apr 2007 11:02:55 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the ones
over 18.
Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh?
How many of you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for
brains same-sex marriage agenda?
Ready to turn in your badge and guns and get to work?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
22 Apr 2007 11:22:10 AM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on the
over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other half).
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the ones
over 18.
Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh?
How many of you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for
brains same-sex marriage agenda?
Ready to turn in your badge and guns and get to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side of this
fiasco.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
22 Apr 2007 04:22:51 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkps5w8jm5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on the
over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other half).
Weird test though.
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or making
a joke.
That test is invalidated by its own design.
You gotta wonder with all the reports of cops performing false impersonation
nowadays and all the references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL"
justice system and all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to
the states.
The justice department is full of holes.
Lawyers and the government and who else (judges I presume) have taken the
justice system and corralled it into their own hands for their own profit.
Understand why they lie so much and deny the people their rights so much and
why it is called the "CRIMINAL' justice system now?
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the ones
over 18.
Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh?
How many of you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for
brains same-sex marriage agenda?
Ready to turn in your badge and guns and get to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side of
this
fiasco.
I knew he was on the pro-life side.
I was only commenting about the FCC code 18 FBI ***** boys.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
22 Apr 2007 10:03:05 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkps5w8jm5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on the
over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other half).
Weird test though.
Weird to *you*?
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or making
a joke.
You're sure of a lot of things that don't have anything to do with reality.
That test is invalidated by its own design.
You gotta wonder with all the reports of cops performing false impersonation
nowadays and all the references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL"
justice system and all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to
the states.
Quit whining because you got busted for assaulting a cop on the job.
The justice department is full of holes.
Lawyers and the government and who else (judges I presume) have taken the
justice system and corralled it into their own hands for their own profit.
Understand why they lie so much and deny the people their rights so much and
why it is called the "CRIMINAL' justice system now?
Because it serves justice to criminals like you.
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the ones
over 18. Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh? How many of
you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for brains same-sex
marriage agenda? Ready to turn in your badge and guns and get to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side of
this fiasco.
I knew he was on the pro-life side.
Pro-fetal life, maybe...he's no more pro-life than you are, given your
screaming at anyone who dares to dispute your frequent outbreaks of insanity.
I was only commenting about the FCC code 18 FBI ***** boys.
In other words, you were just babbling again.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
22 Apr 2007 10:51:26 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkd51viyhi.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkps5w8jm5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on the
over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other half).
Weird test though.
Weird to *you*?
It was obviously not a test that measures up to scientific design standards.
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or
making
a joke.
You're sure of a lot of things that don't have anything to do with
reality.
Propagandist lie.
That test is invalidated by its own design.
You gotta wonder with all the reports of cops performing false
impersonation
nowadays and all the references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL"
justice system and all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to
the states.
Quit whining because you got busted for assaulting a cop on the job.
You are who is whining after your 'kick to the head' theory got busted.
I didn't assault a cop on the job.
What I did was perfectly legal after the criminal cop assaulted me from
behind.
Seems as if you want the USA to turn into a war zone.
The justice department is full of holes.
Lawyers and the government and who else (judges I presume) have taken the
justice system and corralled it into their own hands for their own profit.
Understand why they lie so much and deny the people their rights so much
and
why it is called the "CRIMINAL' justice system now?
Because it serves justice to criminals like you.
*****. The "CRIMINAL" justice system is only concerned with denying
justice to the people they and their cohorts committed crimes against.
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the ones
over 18. Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh? How many of
you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for brains
same-sex
marriage agenda? Ready to turn in your badge and guns and get to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side of
this fiasco.
I knew he was on the pro-life side.
Pro-fetal life, maybe...
LOL! Which statement makes you an anti-fetal life loon.
he's no more pro-life than you are, given your screaming at anyone who
dares to dispute your frequent outbreaks of insanity.
You mean to say that words on pages scream at you?
I was only commenting about the FCC code 18 FBI ***** boys.
In other words, you were just babbling again.
Nah, propagandist cover boy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
22 Apr 2007 11:26:26 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkd51viyhi.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkps5w8jm5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on the
over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other half).
Weird test though.
Weird to *you*?
It was obviously not a test that measures up to scientific design standards.
You're a master of the obvious.
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or making
a joke.
You're sure of a lot of things that don't have anything to do with
reality.
Propagandist lie.
Like claiming you didn't assault a policeman, and then effectively stating
just that two statements later?
That test is invalidated by its own design. You gotta wonder with all the
reports of cops performing false impersonation nowadays and all the
references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL" justice system and
all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to the states.
Quit whining because you got busted for assaulting a cop on the job.
You are who is whining after your 'kick to the head' theory got busted.
I didn't assault a cop on the job.
He was doing his job. Stopping you for DUI is entirely within the scope of
his job, whether you understand it or not.
What I did was perfectly legal after the criminal cop assaulted me from
behind.
That's not what the county says, which is why you have a pending indictment.
Seems as if you want the USA to turn into a war zone.
It's fairly obvious that you have no idea of what you claim.
The justice department is full of holes. Lawyers and the government and
who else (judges I presume) have taken the justice system and corralled it
into their own hands for their own profit. Understand why they lie so much
and deny the people their rights so much and why it is called the
"CRIMINAL' justice system now?
Because it serves justice to criminals like you.
*****. The "CRIMINAL" justice system is only concerned with denying
justice to the people they and their cohorts committed crimes against.
Be sure and make that speech to the court when your case comes to trial.
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the ones
over 18. Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh? How many of
you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for brains
same-sex marriage agenda? Ready to turn in your badge and guns and get
to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side of
this fiasco.
I knew he was on the pro-life side.
Pro-fetal life, maybe...
LOL! Which statement makes you an anti-fetal life loon.
Not at all...since I'm a parent and a grandparent, two things you will never
be.
he's no more pro-life than you are, given your screaming at anyone who
dares to dispute your frequent outbreaks of insanity.
You mean to say that words on pages scream at you?
You obviously mean to say you shouldn't have eaten the chocolate acid a la
Woodstock. (No, I wasn't there.)
I was only commenting about the FCC code 18 FBI ***** boys.
In other words, you were just babbling again.
Nah, propagandist cover boy.
So when are you bringing charges against me? After all, you have claimed that
I'll be doing time in your state, despite my not having been there in 37
years...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
22 Apr 2007 11:52:15 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz0zhg25.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkd51viyhi.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkps5w8jm5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com>
wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on
the
over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other half).
Weird test though.
Weird to *you*?
It was obviously not a test that measures up to scientific design
standards.
You're a master of the obvious.
You scored a point.
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or
making
a joke.
You're sure of a lot of things that don't have anything to do with
reality.
Propagandist lie.
Like claiming you didn't assault a policeman,
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
and then effectively stating
just that two statements later?
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
That test is invalidated by its own design. You gotta wonder with all
the
reports of cops performing false impersonation nowadays and all the
references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL" justice system and
all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to the states.
Quit whining because you got busted for assaulting a cop on the job.
You are who is whining after your 'kick to the head' theory got busted.
I didn't assault a cop on the job.
He was doing his job.
Who taught you that police work involves attacking members of the public?
Stopping you for DUI is entirely within the scope of
his job, whether you understand it or not.
Why is it there is no evidence of DUI?
What I did was perfectly legal after the criminal cop assaulted me from
behind.
That's not what the county says,
Do you mean to say that governments are entitled to attack members of the
population thay are obligated to protect?
which is why you have a pending indictment.
Do you think any government is somehow a real person?
Seems as if you want the USA to turn into a war zone.
It's fairly obvious that you have no idea of what you claim.
With your continued ideas that I am somehow guilty it seems that you desire
the USA to become a war zone to me.
The justice department is full of holes. Lawyers and the government and
who else (judges I presume) have taken the justice system and corralled
it
into their own hands for their own profit. Understand why they lie so
much
and deny the people their rights so much and why it is called the
"CRIMINAL' justice system now?
Because it serves justice to criminals like you.
*****. The "CRIMINAL" justice system is only concerned with denying
justice to the people they and their cohorts committed crimes against.
Be sure and make that speech to the court when your case comes to trial.
When will you understand that you do not dictate what I say?
Tired of displaying your immature persona?
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the
ones
over 18. Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh? How many
of
you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for brains
same-sex marriage agenda? Ready to turn in your badge and guns and
get
to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side
of
this fiasco.
I knew he was on the pro-life side.
Pro-fetal life, maybe...
LOL! Which statement makes you an anti-fetal life loon.
Not at all...since I'm a parent and a grandparent,
But, pro-choice denies life to the fetal person.
two things you will never
be.
Do you like saying such things so much that people think it will be on your
grave marker?
he's no more pro-life than you are, given your screaming at anyone who
dares to dispute your frequent outbreaks of insanity.
You mean to say that words on pages scream at you?
You obviously mean to say you shouldn't have eaten the chocolate acid a la
Woodstock. (No, I wasn't there.)
Another errant insinuation that I did any acid at all.
I was only commenting about the FCC code 18 FBI ***** boys.
In other words, you were just babbling again.
Nah, propagandist cover boy.
So when are you bringing charges against me?
For what?
Are you begging me to?
After all, you have claimed that I'll be doing time in your state, despite
my not having been there in 37
years...
How do you know you aren't on a watchlist here in case you do come to SC?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
23 Apr 2007 06:02:28 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz0zhg25.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkd51viyhi.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkps5w8jm5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com>
wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on the
over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other half).
Weird test though.
Weird to *you*?
It was obviously not a test that measures up to scientific design
standards.
You're a master of the obvious.
You scored a point.
Of course, it goes right over your pointy little head that what's obvious to
you doesn't usually translate to being obvious for sane people.
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or
making a joke.
You're sure of a lot of things that don't have anything to do with
reality.
Propagandist lie.
Like claiming you didn't assault a policeman,
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
Thanks for admitting (once again) that you assaulted a police officer.
and then effectively stating just that two statements later?
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
What part of your psychosis makes you post such obvious delusions?
That test is invalidated by its own design. You gotta wonder with all
the reports of cops performing false impersonation nowadays and all the
references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL" justice system and
all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to the states.
Quit whining because you got busted for assaulting a cop on the job.
You are who is whining after your 'kick to the head' theory got busted.
I didn't assault a cop on the job.
He was doing his job.
Who taught you that police work involves attacking members of the public?
Prove it. (In court, of course.)
Stopping you for DUI is entirely within the scope of his job, whether you
understand it or not.
Why is it there is no evidence of DUI?
I don't know that there is evidence of that or not - but in any case, you were
too stupid to keep from doing what definitely got you into trouble - resisting
arrrest, and assaulting the police officer making the arrest. Your trial (if
it isn't plea-bargained away) is going to be short and painful for you, if
your statements are even close to reality.
What I did was perfectly legal after the criminal cop assaulted me from
behind.
That's not what the county says,
Do you mean to say that governments are entitled to attack members of the
population thay are obligated to protect?
They're not obligated to protect you, since you attacked the county (and by
extension, the city and state).
which is why you have a pending indictment.
Do you think any government is somehow a real person?
I think you know you're caught dead to rights, and don't have the balls to
stand up and admit your flagrant *****-up.
Seems as if you want the USA to turn into a war zone.
It's fairly obvious that you have no idea of what you claim.
With your continued ideas that I am somehow guilty it seems that you desire
the USA to become a war zone to me.
Your inability to understand what you read is your problem.
The justice department is full of holes. Lawyers and the government and
who else (judges I presume) have taken the justice system and corralled
it into their own hands for their own profit. Understand why they lie so
much and deny the people their rights so much and why it is called the
"CRIMINAL' justice system now?
Because it serves justice to criminals like you.
*****. The "CRIMINAL" justice system is only concerned with denying
justice to the people they and their cohorts committed crimes against.
Be sure and make that speech to the court when your case comes to trial.
When will you understand that you do not dictate what I say?
When did I say you had to say it? (You are truly stupid, or psychotic. Pick
one of the two.)
Tired of displaying your immature persona?
This is what you have to deal with online. That's how it goes.
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the
ones over 18. Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh? How
many of you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for
brains same-sex marriage agenda? Ready to turn in your badge and guns
and get to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side of
this fiasco.
I knew he was on the pro-life side.
Pro-fetal life, maybe...
LOL! Which statement makes you an anti-fetal life loon.
Not at all...since I'm a parent and a grandparent,
But, pro-choice denies life to the fetal person.
Is that why my wife is pro-choice and has a daughter? (Ditto for her
daughter, as well...with two additional sons, to boot.)
two things you will never be.
Do you like saying such things so much that people think it will be on your
grave marker?
I don't care what you think. (Neither will South Carolina, in the next year
or so.)
he's no more pro-life than you are, given your screaming at anyone who
dares to dispute your frequent outbreaks of insanity.
You mean to say that words on pages scream at you?
You obviously mean to say you shouldn't have eaten the chocolate acid a la
Woodstock. (No, I wasn't there.)
Another errant insinuation that I did any acid at all.
Quit acting like you did, and maybe people will consider treating you like
something more respectable.
I was only commenting about the FCC code 18 FBI ***** boys.
In other words, you were just babbling again.
Nah, propagandist cover boy.
So when are you bringing charges against me?
For what? Are you begging me to?
How should I know what charges? After all, you're the one who regularly damns
me for my supposed criminal opinions...
After all, you have claimed that I'll be doing time in your state, despite
my not having been there in 37 years...
How do you know you aren't on a watchlist here in case you do come to SC?
Because South Carolina has far more important things to do than cater to the
delusions of one John Darin Wentzky.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
23 Apr 2007 11:42:36 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslaqd797.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz0zhg25.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkd51viyhi.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkps5w8jm5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com>
wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on
the
over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other half).
Weird test though.
Weird to *you*?
It was obviously not a test that measures up to scientific design
standards.
You're a master of the obvious.
You scored a point.
Of course, it goes right over your pointy little head that what's obvious
to
you doesn't usually translate to being obvious for sane people.
Now you think sane people aren't aware of the obvious?
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or
making a joke.
You're sure of a lot of things that don't have anything to do with
reality.
Propagandist lie.
Like claiming you didn't assault a policeman,
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
Thanks for admitting (once again) that you assaulted a police officer.
What a line.
No court in the entire USA would honor your statement as rational.
and then effectively stating just that two statements later?
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
What part of your psychosis makes you post such obvious delusions?
Your psychosis doesn't invalidate the law.
That test is invalidated by its own design. You gotta wonder with all
the reports of cops performing false impersonation nowadays and all
the
references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL" justice system
and
all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to the states.
Quit whining because you got busted for assaulting a cop on the job.
You are who is whining after your 'kick to the head' theory got busted.
I didn't assault a cop on the job.
He was doing his job.
Who taught you that police work involves attacking members of the public?
Prove it.
V-I-D-E-O.
(In court, of course.)
You think that the ACSD or AC wants it to go to court?
Stopping you for DUI is entirely within the scope of his job, whether
you
understand it or not.
Why is it there is no evidence of DUI?
I don't know
Period!
that there is evidence of that or not - but in any case, you were
too stupid to keep from doing what definitely got you into trouble
What would that be, imagination loon?
- resisting arrrest,
When?
and assaulting the police officer making the arrest.
When?
How about all the laws that say the charges against me are unproven?
Your trial (if it isn't plea-bargained away)
You think you know what I can do?
is going to be short
Making reference to the Houston ***** brigade's tactics?
FYI, people in SC actually like children, abortion boy.
and painful for you,
Another reference to some sort fo pain being infliceted upon me?
if your statements are even close to reality.
Painful?
Elaborate on this criminal intent of yours, you idiot.
What I did was perfectly legal after the criminal cop assaulted me from
behind.
That's not what the county says,
Do you mean to say that governments are entitled to attack members of the
population thay are obligated to protect?
They're not obligated to protect you,
A lie that is switftly determined to be a huge flaw in societies that do not
tolerate your criminal allegiance.
Your ignorance and neglect of the law is your undoing.
since you attacked the county
Any more lies you want to make, tax leech, unproductive , unprotective
bitchboy?
(and by extension, the city and state).
You're not calling on the entire world or the USA?
What a joke.
which is why you have a pending indictment.
Do you think any government is somehow a real person?
I think you know you're caught dead to rights,
Dead to rights?
My rights are heavily in favor of me.
and don't have the balls to stand up and admit your flagrant *****-up.
Another wimpy, criminal attempt to somehow coerce via propagandist tactics
some sort of plea to absolve the piece of ***** wop cop who attacked me?
When will you stop being a neglecter of the law rather than a practicioner
of it?
Seems as if you want the USA to turn into a war zone.
It's fairly obvious that you have no idea of what you claim.
With your continued ideas that I am somehow guilty it seems that you
desire
the USA to become a war zone to me.
Your inability to understand what you read is your problem.
Another attempt to hide your scumbga propagandist ***** does nothing to
stall me.
The justice department is full of holes. Lawyers and the government
and
who else (judges I presume) have taken the justice system and
corralled
it into their own hands for their own profit. Understand why they lie
so
much and deny the people their rights so much and why it is called the
"CRIMINAL' justice system now?
Because it serves justice to criminals like you.
*****. The "CRIMINAL" justice system is only concerned with denying
justice to the people they and their cohorts committed crimes against.
Be sure and make that speech to the court when your case comes to trial.
When will you understand that you do not dictate what I say?
When did I say you had to say it?
Seems like every time you think your putrid mouth issues proclamations from
my mouth.
(You are truly stupid, or psychotic. Pick
one of the two.)
I put those two on you, altar boy.
What you must understand is that I am NOT going down for you or the idiots
who attacked me AND that I am NOT required to.
It is time for the scum who do not respect the people or the law to go down.
Tired of displaying your immature persona?
This is what you have to deal with online.
Admission accepted.
That's how it goes.
So, when will the teenage-minded PLH learn to communicate as if he knows
what the USA is about?
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the
ones over 18. Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh?
How
many of you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for
brains same-sex marriage agenda? Ready to turn in your badge and
guns
and get to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side
of
this fiasco.
I knew he was on the pro-life side.
Pro-fetal life, maybe...
LOL! Which statement makes you an anti-fetal life loon.
Not at all...since I'm a parent and a grandparent,
But, pro-choice denies life to the fetal person.
Is that why my wife is pro-choice and has a daughter?
Is that why you are asking me?
(Ditto for her daughter, as well...with two additional sons, to boot.)
Another reference to the PLH boot?
two things you will never be.
Do you like saying such things so much that people think it will be on
your
grave marker?
I don't care what you think.
I must disagree.
(Neither will South Carolina, in the next year
or so.)
South Carolina isn't a person.
How about the fact that is is a vast area of land which people inhabit?
he's no more pro-life than you are, given your screaming at anyone who
dares to dispute your frequent outbreaks of insanity.
You mean to say that words on pages scream at you?
You obviously mean to say you shouldn't have eaten the chocolate acid a
la
Woodstock. (No, I wasn't there.)
Another errant insinuation that I did any acid at all.
Quit acting like you did,
Me?
Do you mean your acid-laden mind assumes that every person whose opinion
differs from yours was a victim of brain salad surgery?
and maybe people will consider treating you like
something more respectable.
How about becoming more respectable and then see if anyone respects you?
I was only commenting about the FCC code 18 FBI ***** boys.
In other words, you were just babbling again.
Nah, propagandist cover boy.
So when are you bringing charges against me?
For what? Are you begging me to?
How should I know what charges? After all, you're the one who regularly
damns
me for my supposed criminal opinions...
Flashbacks?
After all, you have claimed that I'll be doing time in your state,
despite
my not having been there in 37 years...
How do you know you aren't on a watchlist here in case you do come to SC?
Because South Carolina has far more important things to do than cater to
the
delusions of one John Darin Wentzky.
I appreciate you publishing my full name, again.
Don't blame me for the errors of those you so blatantly suck up to.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
24 Apr 2007 12:30:08 AM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslaqd797.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz0zhg25.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkd51viyhi.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkps5w8jm5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1177136117.499517.123690@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 2:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com>
wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
Since Yang is so obsessed with pedophiles...
Here is a test for you Yang...bet you fail it.
http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quiz/likejailbait.php
You're plugging it, Bobby. (That's one site I'll avoid.)
I heard you failed the test...LOL
Who wouldn't?
I didn't. I didn't vote "yes" on a single under-18 choice. (or on
the over-18s, either - since, unlike you, I'm married to my other
half).
Weird test though.
Weird to *you*?
It was obviously not a test that measures up to scientific design
standards.
You're a master of the obvious.
You scored a point.
Of course, it goes right over your pointy little head that what's obvious
to you doesn't usually translate to being obvious for sane people.
Now you think sane people aren't aware of the obvious?
In your case, normal people can tell that you're not all there.
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or
making a joke.
You're sure of a lot of things that don't have anything to do with
reality.
Propagandist lie.
Like claiming you didn't assault a policeman,
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
Thanks for admitting (once again) that you assaulted a police officer.
What a line. No court in the entire USA would honor your statement as
rational.
I'm not testifying in your case...and as for rational, I've served on two
juries (and was the foreman of one).
and then effectively stating just that two statements later?
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
What part of your psychosis makes you post such obvious delusions?
Your psychosis doesn't invalidate the law.
Your refusal to understand what the law says doesn't absolve you.
That test is invalidated by its own design. You gotta wonder with all
the reports of cops performing false impersonation nowadays and all the
references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL" justice system
and all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to the states.
Quit whining because you got busted for assaulting a cop on the job.
You are who is whining after your 'kick to the head' theory got busted.
I didn't assault a cop on the job.
He was doing his job.
Who taught you that police work involves attacking members of the public?
Prove it.
V-I-D-E-O.
That just might mean you're not going to be cluttering up this newsgroup for a
few years.
(In court, of course.)
You think that the ACSD or AC wants it to go to court?
They're the ones who will schedule your court date (assuming your attorney
doesn't plea-bargain out of the whole situation).
Stopping you for DUI is entirely within the scope of his job, whether you
understand it or not.
Why is it there is no evidence of DUI?
I don't know
Period!
You know you're likely up the creek - when you start interrupting my
observations so you can attack them, that's a reliable sign that you've been
caught in the act again.
that there is evidence of that or not - but in any case, you were
too stupid to keep from doing what definitely got you into trouble
What would that be, imagination loon?
Assaulting a police officer, for a start.
- resisting arrrest,
When?
When the officer stopped you, because he had probable cause to at least
interrogate you on suspicion of DUI.
and assaulting the police officer making the arrest.
When?
How about all the laws that say the charges against me are unproven?
That will be sorted out in the trial.
Your trial (if it isn't plea-bargained away)
You think you know what I can do?
I can confidently assume that you don't have enough sense to come in out of
the rain. You've provided more than enough ranting to support that
observation.
is going to be short
Making reference to the Houston ***** brigade's tactics?
FYI, people in SC actually like children, abortion boy.
You're 45 years old, Convicted Criminal Wentzky.
and painful for you,
Another reference to some sort fo pain being infliceted upon me?
A reference to your likely future in prison.
if your statements are even close to reality.
Painful? Elaborate on this criminal intent of yours, you idiot.
What criminal intent? It's not rocket science to figure out that if you go to
prison, it's going to be painful for you.
What I did was perfectly legal after the criminal cop assaulted me from
behind.
That's not what the county says,
Do you mean to say that governments are entitled to attack members of the
population thay are obligated to protect?
They're not obligated to protect you,
A lie that is switftly determined to be a huge flaw in societies that do not
tolerate your criminal allegiance.
Your ignorance and neglect of the law is your undoing.
Your ignorance and stupidity have resulted in you being arrested yet again,
and given your existing criminal record, it's not going to go quite the way
you demand.
since you attacked the county
Any more lies you want to make, tax leech, unproductive , unprotective
bitchboy?
You'll have to find a lie in the first place.
(and by extension, the city and state).
You're not calling on the entire world or the USA? What a joke.
Indeed...you, John Darin Wentzky, are a feeble joke. (IMO, of course.)
which is why you have a pending indictment.
Do you think any government is somehow a real person?
I think you know you're caught dead to rights,
Dead to rights? My rights are heavily in favor of me.
Your rights didn't stop you from pleading (through your attorney) guilty ten
years ago.
and don't have the balls to stand up and admit your flagrant *****-up.
Another wimpy, criminal attempt to somehow coerce via propagandist tactics
some sort of plea to absolve the piece of ***** wop cop who attacked me?
When will you stop being a neglecter of the law rather than a practicioner
of it?
I'm observant of the law...that's why I've never been arrested, much less
done time in jail or prison. (That's one claim you will never be able to make
honestly.)
Seems as if you want the USA to turn into a war zone.
It's fairly obvious that you have no idea of what you claim.
With your continued ideas that I am somehow guilty it seems that you desire
the USA to become a war zone to me.
Your inability to understand what you read is your problem.
Another attempt to hide your scumbga propagandist ***** does nothing to
stall me.
I can't hide what's in plain sight.
The justice department is full of holes. Lawyers and the government
and who else (judges I presume) have taken the justice system and
corralled it into their own hands for their own profit. Understand why
they lie so much and deny the people their rights so much and why it is
called the "CRIMINAL' justice system now?
Because it serves justice to criminals like you.
*****. The "CRIMINAL" justice system is only concerned with denying
justice to the people they and their cohorts committed crimes against.
Be sure and make that speech to the court when your case comes to trial.
When will you understand that you do not dictate what I say?
When did I say you had to say it?
Seems like every time you think your putrid mouth issues proclamations from
my mouth.
Out here in the real world, that's nothing more than your impotent fantasy.
(You are truly stupid, or psychotic. Pick one of the two.)
I put those two on you, altar boy.
That's my opinion of you, son. You don't get a say in it.
What you must understand is that I am NOT going down for you or the idiots
who attacked me AND that I am NOT required to. It is time for the scum who
do not respect the people or the law to go down.
The way you're carrying on, you'll be going down, indeed. (Hopefully as soon
as possible.)
Tired of displaying your immature persona?
This is what you have to deal with online.
Admission accepted.
I'm not on trial. You will be.
That's how it goes.
So, when will the teenage-minded PLH learn to communicate as if he knows
what the USA is about?
I've known what it's about since long before you figured out what strange
squiggles on paper meant.
The breast sizes on most of the women under 18 were bigger than the
ones over 18. Some test for the "CRIMINAL" FBI porno boys, huh? How
many of you scumbag hypocrites are afraid now with that dogshit for
brains same-sex marriage agenda? Ready to turn in your badge and
guns and get to work?
Free clue, not that you'll understand it: Heishman's on *your* side
of this fiasco.
I knew he was on the pro-life side.
Pro-fetal life, maybe...
LOL! Which statement makes you an anti-fetal life loon.
Not at all...since I'm a parent and a grandparent,
But, pro-choice denies life to the fetal person.
Is that why my wife is pro-choice and has a daughter?
Is that why you are asking me?
No, idiot...it's because my wife has been pro-choice not much shorter than
you've been alive, yet she has a daughter - and that daughter, who is also
pro-choice, has presented us with three grandchildren in twelve years. Maybe
you should take ESL classes.
(Ditto for her daughter, as well...with two additional sons, to boot.)
Another reference to the PLH boot?
Another obvious indication that you can't understand much of what you bother
to read.
two things you will never be.
Do you like saying such things so much that people think it will be on your
grave marker?
I don't care what you think.
I must disagree.
Disagree all you want to. Reality couldn't care less.
(Neither will South Carolina, in the next year or so.)
South Carolina isn't a person.
How about the fact that is is a vast area of land which people inhabit?
How about the fact that its judiciary will very likely try you for the
indictment that is pending against you, as a result of your actions on January
9 of this year?
he's no more pro-life than you are, given your screaming at anyone who
dares to dispute your frequent outbreaks of insanity.
You mean to say that words on pages scream at you?
You obviously mean to say you shouldn't have eaten the chocolate acid a
la Woodstock. (No, I wasn't there.)
Another errant insinuation that I did any acid at all.
Quit acting like you did,
Me? Do you mean your acid-laden mind assumes that every person whose opinion
differs from yours was a victim of brain salad surgery?
Jesus Christ on Quaaludes, Wentzky...brain salad surgery? (Aside from being
the title of an EL&P album, it's also slang from the late '60s for something
you obviously never got from a willing partner.)
and maybe people will consider treating you like something more
respectable.
How about becoming more respectable and then see if anyone respects you?
I'm respectable already. (I don't assault police officers, as you're accused
of.)
I was only commenting about the FCC code 18 FBI ***** boys.
In other words, you were just babbling again.
Nah, propagandist cover boy.
So when are you bringing charges against me?
For what? Are you begging me to?
How should I know what charges? After all, you're the one who regularly
damns me for my supposed criminal opinions...
Flashbacks?
English is obviously not your first language. (Fifth or sixth, perhaps.)
After all, you have claimed that I'll be doing time in your state,
despite my not having been there in 37 years...
How do you know you aren't on a watchlist here in case you do come to SC?
Because South Carolina has far more important things to do than cater to
the delusions of one John Darin Wentzky.
I appreciate you publishing my full name, again.
Don't blame me for the errors of those you so blatantly suck up to.
Your name is public record. Get used to it.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
24 Apr 2007 09:57:56 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvefm2vbz.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslaqd797.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz0zhg25.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
It was obviously not a test that measures up to scientific design
standards.
You're a master of the obvious.
You scored a point.
Of course, it goes right over your pointy little head that what's
obvious
to you doesn't usually translate to being obvious for sane people.
Now you think sane people aren't aware of the obvious?
In your case, normal people can tell that you're not all there.
Contradicting yourself so much doesn't show me to be insane or you to be
sane.
I am sure whoever wrote it was probably playing a trick on people or
making a joke.
You're sure of a lot of things that don't have anything to do with
reality.
Propagandist lie.
Like claiming you didn't assault a policeman,
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
Thanks for admitting (once again) that you assaulted a police officer.
What a line. No court in the entire USA would honor your statement as
rational.
I'm not testifying in your case...
You got another one right?
and as for rational, I've served on two
juries (and was the foreman of one).
No point awarded.
and then effectively stating just that two statements later?
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
What part of your psychosis makes you post such obvious delusions?
Your psychosis doesn't invalidate the law.
Your refusal to understand what the law says doesn't absolve you.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzz!
That test is invalidated by its own design. You gotta wonder with
all
the reports of cops performing false impersonation nowadays and all
the
references to the justice system being the "CRIMINAL" justice system
and all the federal incarceration dollars that are paid to the
states.
Quit whining because you got busted for assaulting a cop on the job.
You are who is whining after your 'kick to the head' theory got
busted.
I didn't assault a cop on the job.
He was doing his job.
Who taught you that police work involves attacking members of the
public?
Prove it.
V-I-D-E-O.
That just might mean you're not going to be cluttering up this newsgroup
for a
few years.
What it means is the video shows the cops attacking me.
And, it shows me acting in self-defense.
The video proves my innocence very much and establishes the guilt of the
armed ***** brigade that attacked me.
(In court, of course.)
You think that the ACSD or AC wants it to go to court?
They're the ones who will schedule your court date
All the while you think they have any legal authority to withhold the video
from me and my attorney and all the people who are allied with me?
LOL!
Them making themselves into the fear-filled, scumbag, criminal, secrecy,
anti-justice, self-protectionist perverts they are making themselves into
doesn't impress anyone with a brain at all.
How about all those taxes all the people pay to fund the ***** brigade
and all the persons' salaries that are witholding the video evidence from
me?
(assuming your attorney doesn't plea-bargain out of the whole situation).
What you assume is that every person in the USA is content with the illegal
taxation without representation now.
No one expects the government to be such a lame perverted coward.
Stopping you for DUI is entirely within the scope of his job, whether
you
understand it or not.
Why is it there is no evidence of DUI?
I don't know
Period!
You know you're likely up the creek
*****. I know the video exposes the criminal ***** brigade.
All you seem to have is ignorance, lies, and false assumptions too many
times.
- when you start interrupting my observations so you can attack them,
Attack?
Do you mean to say that your computer is offended by me responding to
statements you make in whole or in part?
that's a reliable sign that you've been
caught in the act again.
All signs point to: "You *ARE* an idiot."
Caught in what act, gooney boy *****?
that there is evidence of that or not - but in any case, you were
too stupid to keep from doing what definitely got you into trouble
What would that be, imagination loon?
Assaulting a police officer, for a start.
When did I assault a polive officer?
- resisting arrrest,
When?
When the officer stopped you,
How does anyone resist arrest when no attempt at arresting anyone is
occurring?
because he had probable cause to at least
interrogate you on suspicion of DUI.
*****. He had no probable cause.
And, how about that no warrants shall issue except upon probable cause
thing; and the fact that the officer who ATTACKED me had no warrant?
I do not support your lies.
The officer had no probable cause to interrogate me on suspicion of DUI.
I was not driving erratically or in violation of any traffic code.
The officer was a piece of criminal idiotic tax leech gooney puffed up
shitforbrains idiot who couldn't control himself.
He attacked me, you idiot.
and assaulting the police officer making the arrest.
When?
How about all the laws that say the charges against me are unproven?
That will be sorted out in the trial.
What trial?
Your trial (if it isn't plea-bargained away)
You think you know what I can do?
I can confidently assume that you don't have enough sense to come in out
of
the rain.
I see you aren't into Fred Astaire or Gene Kelly any.
You've provided more than enough ranting to support that
observation.
"Raindrops keep falling on my head, but that doesn't mean my eyes will soon
be turning red."
is going to be short
Making reference to the Houston ***** brigade's tactics?
FYI, people in SC actually like children, abortion boy.
You're 45 years old,
No point, even though you are correct.
Convicted Criminal Wentzky.
Error.
I am not a convict nor am I a criminal, abortion boy, ***** freak.
and painful for you,
Another reference to some sort of pain being inflicted upon me?
A reference to your likely future in prison.
I see your statistics methods are less than elementary.
if your statements are even close to reality.
Painful? Elaborate on this criminal intent of yours, you idiot.
What criminal intent?
"Painful for you" connotes no criminal intent at all when you act as if that
is your plan for living in utero and ex utero persons?
It's not rocket science to figure out that if you go to
prison, it's going to be painful for you.
Painful?
Still unable to elaborate?
What I did was perfectly legal after the criminal cop assaulted me
from
behind.
That's not what the county says,
Do you mean to say that governments are entitled to attack members of
the
population thay are obligated to protect?
They're not obligated to protect you,
A lie that is switftly determined to be a huge flaw in societies that do
not
tolerate your criminal allegiance.
Your ignorance and neglect of the law is your undoing.
Your ignorance and stupidity have resulted in you being arrested yet
again,
What ignorance, what stupidity, you criminally-minded lunatic?
and given your existing criminal record,
What criminal record, you idiotic double jeopardy abortion freak?
it's not going to go quite the way
you demand.
*****.
It shall go exactly as I demand every step of the way until I am satisfied.
The error of failing to obey my legal demands is what will bring more of the
thing(s) you (and how many others?) do NOT want to occur in the USA.
since you attacked the county
Any more lies you want to make, tax leech, unproductive , unprotective
bitchboy?
You'll have to find a lie in the first place. \
Whenever you lie I detect it.
Now, when did I attack any county anywhere?
(and by extension, the city and state).
You're not calling on the entire world or the USA? What a joke.
Indeed...you, John Darin Wentzky, are a feeble joke. (IMO, of course.)
I am no feeble joke, you immature lunatic.
I am your master, yet you do not recognize it yet.
Your problem is you failed the test and you are unwilling to obey the rules
which renders you my underling.
It may surprise you someday, and how far that is in the future only time
will tell.
which is why you have a pending indictment.
Do you think any government is somehow a real person?
I think you know you're caught dead to rights,
Dead to rights? My rights are heavily in favor of me.
Your rights didn't stop you from pleading (through your attorney) guilty
ten
years ago.
Ten years ago to you is 2007.
What part of your allegiance to crime have you forgot would fail yet?
You know it happens, and if you don't know you will know in due time.
and don't have the balls to stand up and admit your flagrant *****-up.
Another wimpy, criminal attempt to somehow coerce via propagandist tactics
some sort of plea to absolve the piece of ***** wop cop who attacked me?
When will you stop being a neglecter of the law rather than a practicioner
of it?
I'm observant of the law...
Observing and performing are not identical activities.
I am an observer and a performer.
I mostly performed because of my excellent track record of observation; and
because of the plethora of excellent teachers I had to teach me.
Your problem seems to be you are not content with such persons who are
demonstratedly superior being elevated to positions that ***** ups currently
occupy.
that's why I've never been arrested, much less
done time in jail or prison.
Another testament about fuckups being guilty and not punished and of
prosecution of the innocent to fund your criminal life.
(That's one claim you will never be able to make
honestly.)
LOL!
I am unimpressed.
You are an ally of CRIMINALS, you idiot.
I am innocent.
Seems as if you want the USA to turn into a war zone.
It's fairly obvious that you have no idea of what you claim.
With your continued ideas that I am somehow guilty it seems that you
desire
the USA to become a war zone to me.
Your inability to understand what you read is your problem.
Another attempt to hide your scumbag propagandist ***** does nothing to
stall me.
I can't hide what's in plain sight.
That you are an atheistic, propagandist abortion on demand ally of
CRIMINALS?
The justice department is full of holes. Lawyers and the government
and who else (judges I presume) have taken the justice system and
corralled it into their own hands for their own profit. Understand
why
they lie so much and deny the people their rights so much and why it
is
called the "CRIMINAL' justice system now?
Because it serves justice to criminals like you.
*****. The "CRIMINAL" justice system is only concerned with denying
justice to the people they and their cohorts committed crimes against.
Be sure and make that speech to the court when your case comes to
trial.
When will you understand that you do not dictate what I say?
When did I say you had to say it?
Seems like every time you think your putrid mouth issues proclamations
from
my mouth.
Out here in the real world, that's nothing more than your impotent
fantasy.
Denying anyone their rights at law is quite criminal.
(You are truly stupid, or psychotic. Pick one of the two.)
I put those two on you, altar boy.
That's my opinion of you, son.
You don't have a son, remember?
You don't get a say in it.
*****, you idiot.
I get a say about anything.
What you must understand is that I am NOT going down for you or the idiots
who attacked me AND that I am NOT required to. It is time for the scum
who
do not respect the people or the law to go down.
The way you're carrying on,
I should be awarded.
you'll be going down, indeed.
Nah, idiot, ally of CRIMINALS.
Your cowardice of intimidation is a shame upon you and all your CRIMINAL
scumbag friends.
(Hopefully as soon
as possible.)
LOL!
Look who's going down now, you cowardly intimidation whiner.
The red is off your candy, bucko, and I am really going to enjoy licking it
and enjoying it and and watching you and your CRIMINAL ***** bigot
friends starve to death if you fail to get off your tax leech lazy scumbag
asses and work for a living.
[snip]
I am already immensely enjoying seeing the CRIMINAL tax leech *****
idiots suffer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: test for Yang |
24 Apr 2007 11:50:27 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvefm2vbz.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkslaqd797.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
[...]
You scored a point.
Of course, it goes right over your pointy little head that what's obvious
to you doesn't usually translate to being obvious for sane people.
Now you think sane people aren't aware of the obvious?
In your case, normal people can tell that you're not all there.
Contradicting yourself so much doesn't show me to be insane or you to be
sane.
Thanks for illustrating your illiteracy.
[...]
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
Thanks for admitting (once again) that you assaulted a police officer.
What a line. No court in the entire USA would honor your statement as
rational.
I'm not testifying in your case...
You got another one right?
Idiot. I am not a witness to your latest fiasco. That doesn't mean I can't
provide information to help the Solicitor make the state's case against you.
and as for rational, I've served on two
juries (and was the foreman of one).
No point awarded.
No surprise, since you are pointless.
[...]
What part of self-defense escapes your knowledge of the rights of the
people?
What part of your psychosis makes you post such obvious delusions?
Your psychosis doesn't invalidate the law.
Your refusal to understand what the law says doesn't absolve you.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzz!
Another tactic that won't win you any friends in court.
[...]
Who taught you that police work involves attacking members of the
public?
Prove it.
V-I-D-E-O.
That just might mean you're not going to be cluttering up this newsgroup
for a few years.
What it means is the video shows the cops attacking me.
How would YOU know? The video is state's evidence.
And, it shows me acting in self-defense.
The video proves my innocence very much and establishes the guilt of the
armed ***** brigade that attacked me.
Don't be surprised if the court sees it a different way.
(In court, of course.)
You think that the ACSD or AC wants it to go to court?
They're the ones who will schedule your court date
All the while you think they have any legal authority to withhold the video
from me and my attorney and all the people who are allied with me?
LOL!
They won't withhold it from you, as it'll be presented during your trial.
Them making themselves into the fear-filled, scumbag, criminal, secrecy,
anti-justice, self-protectionist perverts they are making themselves into
doesn't impress anyone with a brain at all.
Meanwhile, you're not going to win over the state by making your mental
illness so blatantly obvious.
How about all those taxes all the people pay to fund the ***** brigade
and all the persons' salaries that are witholding the video evidence from
me?
Because it's state's evidence, for a start.
(assuming your attorney doesn't plea-bargain out of the whole situation).
What you assume is that every person in the USA is content with the illegal
taxation without representation now.
No one expects the government to be such a lame perverted coward.
What I assume is that you, John D. Wentzky, are severely mentally afflicted.
Stopping you for DUI is entirely within the scope of his job, whether
you understand it or not.
Why is it there is no evidence of DUI?
I don't know
Period!
You know you're likely up the creek
*****. I know the video exposes the criminal ***** brigade.
....even though you have yet to see it.
All you seem to have is ignorance, lies, and false assumptions too many
times.
Your opinion is not my problem.
- when you start interrupting my observations so you can attack them,
Attack?
Do you mean to say that your computer is offended by me responding to
statements you make in whole or in part?
No. You mean to say that you're too stupid to shut up.
that's a reliable sign that you've been
caught in the act again.
All signs point to: "You *ARE* an idiot."
Caught in what act, gooney boy *****?
Well, how about assaulting a policeman?
that there is evidence of that or not - but in any case, you were
too stupid to keep from doing what definitely got you into trouble
What would that be, imagination loon?
Assaulting a police officer, for a start.
When did I assault a polive officer?
January 9, 2007 - so says the warrant.
- resisting arrrest,
When?
When the officer stopped you,
How does anyone resist arrest when no attempt at arresting anyone is
occurring?
That's for the court to decide - not you.
because he had probable cause to at least
interrogate you on suspicion of DUI.
*****. He had no probable cause.
That will be the court's decision.
And, how about that no warrants shall issue except upon probable cause
thing; and the fact that the officer who ATTACKED me had no warrant?
He evidently had probable cause to stop you.
I do not support your lies.
The officer had no probable cause to interrogate me on suspicion of DUI.
I was not driving erratically or in violation of any traffic code.
The officer was a piece of criminal idiotic tax leech gooney puffed up
shitforbrains idiot who couldn't control himself.
He attacked me, you idiot.
Prove it in court, then.
and assaulting the police officer making the arrest.
When? How about all the laws that say the charges against me are unproven?
That will be sorted out in the trial.
What trial?
The one you will be arraigned for, at some time in the future.
Your trial (if it isn't plea-bargained away)
You think you know what I can do?
I can confidently assume that you don't have enough sense to come in out of
the rain.
I see you aren't into Fred Astaire or Gene Kelly any.
I can see that you're not into reality very much.
You've provided more than enough ranting to support that
observation.
"Raindrops keep falling on my head, but that doesn't mean my eyes will soon
be turning red."
Keep tapdancing away from the reality you're trying to deny.
is going to be short
Making reference to the Houston ***** brigade's tactics?
FYI, people in SC actually like children, abortion boy.
You're 45 years old,
No point, even though you are correct.
You're acting like our younger grandson - then again, he's got an excuse for
his behavior, seeing as he reached the ripe old age of nine months today.
Convicted Criminal Wentzky.
Error.
I am not a convict nor am I a criminal, abortion boy, ***** freak.
You pled guilty to the charge of indecent exposure ten years ago. (Whether
your attorney plea-bargained it or you entered the guilty plea yourself makes
no difference. You were convicted. Live with that consequence of your
choice.)
and painful for you,
Another reference to some sort of pain being inflicted upon me?
A reference to your likely future in prison.
I see your statistics methods are less than elementary.
You don't see anything you don't want to see. Reality operates on a different
basis.
if your statements are even close to reality.
Painful? Elaborate on this criminal intent of yours, you idiot.
What criminal intent?
"Painful for you" connotes no criminal intent at all when you act as if that
is your plan for living in utero and ex utero persons?
Since you're babbling again, I'll leave it to you to try and figure out what
you're trying to claim.
It's not rocket science to figure out that if you go to prison, it's going
to be painful for you.
Painful? Still unable to elaborate?
You'll just have to learn by your own experience.
What I did was perfectly legal after the criminal cop assaulted me from
behind.
That's not what the county says,
Do you mean to say that governments are entitled to attack members of the
population thay are obligated to protect?
They're not obligated to protect you,
A lie that is switftly determined to be a huge flaw in societies that do
not tolerate your criminal allegiance. Your ignorance and neglect of the
law is your undoing.
Your ignorance and stupidity have resulted in you being arrested yet
again,
What ignorance, what stupidity, you criminally-minded lunatic?
Let's see - being stopped for DUI, resisting arrest, and assaulting a police
officer. That's an addition to pleading guilty for indecent exposure in
exchange for probation, which you violated and wound up doing time for said
violation and paying a fine on top of that.
and given your existing criminal record,
What criminal record, you idiotic double jeopardy abortion freak?
The one you've already established.
it's not going to go quite the way you demand.
*****.
It shall go exactly as I demand every step of the way until I am satisfied.
Keep amusing the court with your proclamations.
The error of failing to obey my legal demands is what will bring more of the
thing(s) you (and how many others?) do NOT want to occur in the USA.
Why would I not want you to be confined in a state hospital so it can be
determined if there is any chance of fixing what's wrong in your head?
since you attacked the county
Any more lies you want to make, tax leech, unproductive , unprotective
bitchboy?
You'll have to find a lie in the first place.
Whenever you lie I detect it.
Now, when did I attack any county anywhere?
When you assaulted an Anderson County police officer, as the warrant states.
(and by extension, the city and state).
You're not calling on the entire world or the USA? What a joke.
Indeed...you, John Darin Wentzky, are a feeble joke. (IMO, of course.)
I am no feeble joke, you immature lunatic.
I am your master, yet you do not recognize it yet.
I never will recognize itt, because it's your delusion.
Your problem is you failed the test and you are unwilling to obey the rules
which renders you my underling.
....which I couldn't care less about.
It may surprise you someday, and how far that is in the future only time
will tell.
Not while you're doing time.
which is why you have a pending indictment.
Do you think any government is somehow a real person?
I think you know you're caught dead to rights,
Dead to rights? My rights are heavily in favor of me.
Your rights didn't stop you from pleading (through your attorney) guilty
ten years ago.
Ten years ago to you is 2007.
Ten years ago is your violation of probation in 1997.
What part of your allegiance to crime have you forgot would fail yet?
You know it happens, and if you don't know you will know in due time.
Not by anything you concoct to try and "prove".
and don't have the balls to stand up and admit your flagrant *****-up.
Another wimpy, criminal attempt to somehow coerce via propagandist tactics
some sort of plea to absolve the piece of ***** wop cop who attacked me?
When will you stop being a neglecter of the law rather than a practicioner
of it?
I'm observant of the law...
Observing and performing are not identical activities.
Could you quit belaboring the obvious, for once in your life?
I am an observer and a performer.
....which, in your case, translates to "I, John D. Wentzky, am trying to weasel
my way out of the latest mess I've made without having to be held accountable
for it".
I mostly performed because of my excellent track record of observation; and
because of the plethora of excellent teachers I had to teach me.
Your problem seems to be you are not content with such persons who are
demonstratedly superior being elevated to positions that ***** ups currently
occupy.
Your problem is that you're delusional on a frequent basis.
that's why I've never been arrested, much less done time in jail or prison.
Another testament about fuckups being guilty and not punished and of
prosecution of the innocent to fund your criminal life.
Thanks for taking Mick Jagger so seriously, then..."Just as every cop is a
criminal, and all the sinners saints!"? Not applicable to the real world,
infortunately for you.
(That's one claim you will never be able to make honestly.)
LOL!
I am unimpressed.
You are an ally of CRIMINALS, you idiot.
I am innocent.
The court (and likely a jury of your peers) will decide that.
[...]
With your continued ideas that I am somehow guilty it seems that you
desire the USA to become a war zone to me.
Your inability to understand what you read is your problem.
Another attempt to hide your scumbag propagandist ***** does nothing to
stall me.
I can't hide what's in plain sight.
That you are an atheistic, propagandist abortion on demand ally of
CRIMINALS?
I'm none of that, which is one reason the only trials I've ever been involved
with were those in which I was one of the jurors' panel (and those that I
served on the jury).
[...]
When will you understand that you do not dictate what I say?
When did I say you had to say it?
Seems like every time you think your putrid mouth issues proclamations from
my mouth.
Out here in the real world, that's nothing more than your impotent
fantasy.
Denying anyone their rights at law is quite criminal.
You're not being denied your rights under the law. You have every right to
destroy your own defense, if you so choose.
(You are truly stupid, or psychotic. Pick one of the two.)
I put those two on you, altar boy.
That's my opinion of you, son.
You don't have a son, remember?
You're too stupid to recognize a common figure of speech in your part of the
world?
You don't get a say in it.
*****, you idiot. I get a say about anything.
Try enforcing that and see how long you live. (No threat implied - just an
observation that normal people will not take kindly to that tactic of yours,
and they can exercise their right to ignore your demands.)
What you must understand is that I am NOT going down for you or the idiots
who attacked me AND that I am NOT required to. It is time for the scum who
do not respect the people or the law to go down.
The way you're carrying on,
I should be awarded.
You should be fitted for a straitjacket.
you'll be going down, indeed.
Nah, idiot, ally of CRIMINALS.
Your cowardice of intimidation is a shame upon you and all your CRIMINAL
scumbag friends.
Doesn't bother me in the least, since that's your delusion.
(Hopefully as soon as possible.)
LOL!
Look who's going down now, you cowardly intimidation whiner.
The red is off your candy, bucko, and I am really going to enjoy licking it
and enjoying it and and watching you and your CRIMINAL ***** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |