| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"papa jack" |
| Date: |
05 Jun 2004 03:52:31 PM |
| Object: |
Texas GOP Platform |
On June 4, 2004, the Houston Chronicle posted an article by
Clay Robison and John Gonzalez titled: "Taxes, Gays, Abortion
Targeted by State GOP." Go to:
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2610350
_________________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
"Texas Republican delegates on Friday adopted an
ultraconservative party platform that attacks a
wide range of targets -- from taxes and homosex-
uality to abortion and the United Nations -- and
gives a mixed review to Gov. Perry's priorities.
[...]
"The Texas Republican Party has long been on record
against hot-button social issues such as abortion,
homosexuality and gay marriage. But the recent
approval of gay marriages in Massachusetts prompted
delegates to strengthen their language on that issue.
"The new platform not only condemns homosexuality
-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of
society' -- it also advocates felony penalties for
anyone issuing a marriage license or performing a
marriage ceremony for a same-sex couple.
[...]
"Delegates adopted a plank that strongly supports
the war in Iraq. Another plank re-emphasizes long-
standing conservative antipathy toward the United
Nations by calling for the United States to rescind
its membership in the U.N. and physically evict the
U.N., which is headquartered in New York, from U.S.
soil.
[...]
_________________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
I remember, when I was growing up, Texas was run by
and for Democrats. My grandfather, a staunch Dem
was a county commissioner for over 30 years back
in the days when LBJ was working his way up the
ladder.
I can tell you from remembering hearing him talk,
my grandfather would have not had many problems
with this so-called ultra conservative GOP plat-
form. I can also tell you he would have held
Kerry in utter contempt.
How things do change.
.
|
|
| User: "Flower Power" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
05 Jun 2004 06:15:13 PM |
|
|
"papa jack" <papajack37@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:bd9f1f6b.0406051252.720f0fe0@posting.google.com...
"The new platform not only condemns homosexuality
-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of
society'
====================
How do gay marriages "tear at the fabric of society?" What is the "fabric
of society?" They haven't had any effect on my family or friends at all!
Who cares if they marry since it's NONE of anyone's business but their own?
--
PQ....
"We look at the ancient Greeks with their gods on a mountain top throwing
lightning bolts and say, 'Those ancient Greeks. They were so silly. So
primitive
and naive. Not like our religions. We have burning bushes talking to people
and
guys walking on water. We're ...sophisticated.'"
-= Paul Provenza =-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "papa jack" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
06 Jun 2004 06:33:08 PM |
|
|
"Flower Power" <WomenFirst@this.NG> wrote
in message news:<3IadnShnzd2YyV_dRVn-ig@heartoftn.net>...
"papa jack" <papajack37@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:bd9f1f6b.0406051252.720f0fe0@posting.google.com...
========================================================================
Papa Jack cited:
On June 4, 2004, the Houston Chronicle posted an article by
Clay Robison and John Gonzalez titled: "Taxes, Gays, Abortion
Targeted by State GOP." Go to:
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2610350
_________________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
"Texas Republican delegates on Friday adopted an
ultraconservative party platform that attacks a
wide range of targets -- from taxes and homosex-
uality to abortion and the United Nations -- and
gives a mixed review to Gov. Perry's priorities.
[...]
"The Texas Republican Party has long been on record
against hot-button social issues such as abortion,
homosexuality and gay marriage. But the recent
approval of gay marriages in Massachusetts prompted
delegates to strengthen their language on that issue.
"The new platform not only condemns homosexuality
-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of
society' -- it also advocates felony penalties for
anyone issuing a marriage license or performing a
marriage ceremony for a same-sex couple.
[...]
========================================================================
Flower Power wrote:
How do gay marriages "tear at the fabric of society?"
========================================================================
Papa Jack replies:
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of
society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
GEN+19&language=english&version=NKJV&showfn=on&showxref=on
Genesis 19:
13 For we will destroy this place, because the
outcry against them has grown great before
the face of the LORD, and the LORD has sent
us to destroy it."
[...]
24 Then the LORD rained brimstone and fire on Sodom
and Gomorrah, from the LORD out of the heavens.
25 So He overthrew those cities, all the plain, all
the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on
the ground.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?passage=Romans+1&x=12&y=4&NKJV_version=yes&language=english
Romans 1:
26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions.
For even their women exchanged the natural use for
what is against nature.
27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of
the woman, burned in their lust for one another,
men with men committing what is shameful, and
receiving in themselves the penalty of their error
which was due.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Homosexuality is also considered a great sin by the
Moslems.
========================================================================
Flower Power wrote:
What is the "fabric of society?"
========================================================================
Papa Jack replied:
A shared culture and sense of moral values. Because we
are a "melting pot" nation, we've adapted to respecting
differences of cultural traditions and moral beliefs.
However, without some sense of shared moral values, we
are just a loose collection of people who happen to
live near one another.
========================================================================
Flower Power wrote:
They haven't had any effect on my family or friends at all!
========================================================================
Papa Jack asks:
Is that all that matters?
What if I told you thousands of people suffered from
the long-term effects of homosexuality in our society?
Would that matter then?
========================================================================
Flower Power wrote:
Who cares if they marry since it's NONE of anyone's
business but their own?
========================================================================
Papa Jack remarks:
Do you care if a man decides to marry three women
at the same time -- if all of the women agree?
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry
a 10-year old little girl?
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German
shepard dog?
At what point do you care? How far can people go
without totally devaluing the very concept of marriage?
I do not believe our Constitution grants special
"RIGHTS" to people based on their gender confusion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
06 Jun 2004 07:55:46 PM |
|
|
(Jackson's idiot quoting style repaired)
papajack37@sbcglobal.net (papa jack) writes:
"Flower Power" <WomenFirst@this.NG> wrote
in message news:<3IadnShnzd2YyV_dRVn-ig@heartoftn.net>...
"papa jack" <papajack37@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:bd9f1f6b.0406051252.720f0fe0@posting.google.com...
On June 4, 2004, the Houston Chronicle posted an article by
Clay Robison and John Gonzalez titled: "Taxes, Gays, Abortion
Targeted by State GOP." Go to:
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2610350
Excerpts:
"Texas Republican delegates on Friday adopted an
ultraconservative party platform that attacks a
wide range of targets -- from taxes and homosex-
uality to abortion and the United Nations -- and
gives a mixed review to Gov. Perry's priorities.
[...]
"The Texas Republican Party has long been on record
against hot-button social issues such as abortion,
homosexuality and gay marriage. But the recent
approval of gay marriages in Massachusetts prompted
delegates to strengthen their language on that issue.
"The new platform not only condemns homosexuality
-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of
society' -- it also advocates felony penalties for
anyone issuing a marriage license or performing a
marriage ceremony for a same-sex couple.
How do gay marriages "tear at the fabric of society?"
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
No, but I've heard of Sodom and Gomorrah. (That's a curious typo to make, as
those two vowels are at opposite ends of a Scholes keyboard. What are you
using, a Dvorak?)
Genesis 19:
13 For we will destroy this place, because the
outcry against them has grown great before
the face of the LORD, and the LORD has sent
us to destroy it."
[...]
24 Then the LORD rained brimstone and fire on Sodom
and Gomorrah, from the LORD out of the heavens.
25 So He overthrew those cities, all the plain, all
the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on
the ground.
Nice dodge, Jackson...ever consider that the edited tale you're drooling over
had more than a little to do with the lack of respect shown for the two
visitors? That's before you get to that annoying little detail that your holy
book has its place...in a church. No one has to believe as you do, and
whatever cult you belong to can't shove its swill down anyone else's throat.
Romans 1:
26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions.
For even their women exchanged the natural use for
what is against nature.
27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of
the woman, burned in their lust for one another,
men with men committing what is shameful, and
receiving in themselves the penalty of their error
which was due.
Homosexuality is also considered a great sin by the Moslems.
....at least, those who bother with observing every sura in the Koran, anyway.
So what? Your three-millennia-old fairy tale doesn't provide a basis for law.
What is the "fabric of society?"
A shared culture and sense of moral values. Because we are a "melting pot"
nation, we've adapted to respecting differences of cultural traditions and
moral beliefs.
However, without some sense of shared moral values, we are just a loose
collection of people who happen to live near one another.
....and you're the whiny little git you are because you can't make the rest of
us share YOUR fraud of a "moral code". Way to stumble out of the cantina and
into the ditch, Jackson!
They haven't had any effect on my family or friends at all!
Is that all that matters?
What if I told you thousands of people suffered from the long-term effects of
homosexuality in our society? Would that matter then?
Probably not, as she'd ask you the same thing: where's your proof, Brother
Oral? I guess you'll have to ram your head back into the sand, because about
the *only* long-term effect of homosexuality is this: if you're a gay man,
your preferred sexual partner (and possibly spouse) will not be the same sex
as a heterosexual man's (like me) preferred partner or spouse will be. You
don't have a sufficient foundation to build your campaign of
government-sponsored hate on that, though, thus your less than respectable
tactics.
Who cares if they marry since it's NONE of anyone's
business but their own?
Do you care if a man decides to marry three women at the same time -- if all
of the women agree?
If they consent, what's the problem? (Some Mormons still practice that out in
southwestern Utah. Go whine at them.)
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry a 10-year old little girl?
There *are* reasons for proscribing that.
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German shepard dog?
Leave it to an alleged "Christian" like you to bring *that* up. Is it too
much for you to figure out that marriage has historically been between humans?
At what point do you care? How far can people go without totally devaluing
the very concept of marriage?
A bit farther than YOU can stand, without devaluing it.
I do not believe our Constitution grants special "RIGHTS" to people based on
their gender confusion.
Idiot. I have the right to marry the consenting adult of my choice -- because
I'm heterosexual, thus the consenting adult is (by definition) female. A
homosexual doesn't have that right. How the hell is correcting *that* error
granting special rights? It's restoring equal rights. What rights of mine
are being infringed upon if same-sex marriage is allowed? None. Period.
Maybe you should grow up and realize that you don't get to dictate how the
rest of us conduct our lives, Jackson.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
06 Jun 2004 10:54:32 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfz9889v1.fsf@fnord.io.com...
(Jackson's idiot quoting style repaired)
papajack37@sbcglobal.net (papa jack) writes:
"Flower Power" <WomenFirst@this.NG> wrote
in message news:<3IadnShnzd2YyV_dRVn-ig@heartoftn.net>...
"papa jack" <papajack37@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:bd9f1f6b.0406051252.720f0fe0@posting.google.com...
On June 4, 2004, the Houston Chronicle posted an article by
Clay Robison and John Gonzalez titled: "Taxes, Gays, Abortion
Targeted by State GOP." Go to:
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2610350
Excerpts:
"Texas Republican delegates on Friday adopted an
ultraconservative party platform that attacks a
wide range of targets -- from taxes and homosex-
uality to abortion and the United Nations -- and
gives a mixed review to Gov. Perry's priorities.
[...]
"The Texas Republican Party has long been on record
against hot-button social issues such as abortion,
homosexuality and gay marriage. But the recent
approval of gay marriages in Massachusetts prompted
delegates to strengthen their language on that issue.
"The new platform not only condemns homosexuality
-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of
society' -- it also advocates felony penalties for
anyone issuing a marriage license or performing a
marriage ceremony for a same-sex couple.
How do gay marriages "tear at the fabric of society?"
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
No, but I've heard of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Well good for you.
(That's a curious typo to make, as
those two vowels are at opposite ends of a Scholes keyboard. What are you
using, a Dvorak?)
Genesis 19:
13 For we will destroy this place, because the
outcry against them has grown great before
the face of the LORD, and the LORD has sent
us to destroy it."
[...]
24 Then the LORD rained brimstone and fire on Sodom
and Gomorrah, from the LORD out of the heavens.
25 So He overthrew those cities, all the plain, all
the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on
the ground.
Nice dodge, Jackson...ever consider that the edited tale you're drooling
over
had more than a little to do with the lack of respect shown for the two
visitors? That's before you get to that annoying little detail that your
holy
book has its place...in a church. No one has to believe as you do, and
whatever cult you belong to can't shove its swill down anyone else's
throat.
Romans 1:
26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions.
For even their women exchanged the natural use for
what is against nature.
27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of
the woman, burned in their lust for one another,
men with men committing what is shameful, and
receiving in themselves the penalty of their error
which was due.
Homosexuality is also considered a great sin by the Moslems.
...at least, those who bother with observing every sura in the Koran,
anyway.
So what? Your three-millennia-old fairy tale doesn't provide a basis for
law.
What is the "fabric of society?"
A shared culture and sense of moral values. Because we are a "melting
pot"
nation, we've adapted to respecting differences of cultural traditions
and
moral beliefs.
However, without some sense of shared moral values, we are just a loose
collection of people who happen to live near one another.
...and you're the whiny little git you are because you can't make the rest
of
us share YOUR fraud of a "moral code". Way to stumble out of the cantina
and
into the ditch, Jackson!
They haven't had any effect on my family or friends at all!
Is that all that matters?
What if I told you thousands of people suffered from the long-term
effects of
homosexuality in our society? Would that matter then?
Probably not, as she'd ask you the same thing: where's your proof,
Brother
Oral? I guess you'll have to ram your head back into the sand, because
about
the *only* long-term effect of homosexuality is this: if you're a gay
man,
your preferred sexual partner (and possibly spouse) will not be the same
sex
as a heterosexual man's (like me) preferred partner or spouse will be.
You
don't have a sufficient foundation to build your campaign of
government-sponsored hate on that, though, thus your less than respectable
tactics.
Who cares if they marry since it's NONE of anyone's
business but their own?
Do you care if a man decides to marry three women at the same time -- if
all
of the women agree?
If they consent, what's the problem? (Some Mormons still practice that
out in
southwestern Utah. Go whine at them.)
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry a 10-year old little
girl?
There *are* reasons for proscribing that.
Just as there are reasons for proscribing homosexual "marriage".
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German shepard dog?
Leave it to an alleged "Christian" like you to bring *that* up. Is it too
much for you to figure out that marriage has historically been between
humans?
It's also historically been between a man and a woman.
At what point do you care? How far can people go without totally
devaluing
the very concept of marriage?
A bit farther than YOU can stand, without devaluing it.
Is a marriage between a father and his ten year old daughter farther than
YOU can stand?
I do not believe our Constitution grants special "RIGHTS" to people based
on
their gender confusion.
Idiot. I have the right to marry the consenting adult of my choice --
because
I'm heterosexual, thus the consenting adult is (by definition) female. A
homosexual doesn't have that right. How the hell is correcting *that*
error
granting special rights? It's restoring equal rights.
It follows that women should have the right to walk around in public
topless, that men should have the right to use a public women's restroom,
and that 18 year old men should NOT have to register for selective service
(or 18 year old women SHOULD have to register).
What rights of mine
are being infringed upon if same-sex marriage is allowed? None. Period.
Maybe you should grow up and realize that you don't get to dictate how the
rest of us conduct our lives, Jackson.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
07 Jun 2004 04:00:35 PM |
|
|
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfz9889v1.fsf@fnord.io.com...
(Jackson's idiot quoting style repaired)
papajack37@sbcglobal.net (papa jack) writes:
[...]
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
No, but I've heard of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Well good for you.
I'm almost impressed.
[...]
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry a 10-year old little girl?
There *are* reasons for proscribing that.
Just as there are reasons for proscribing homosexual "marriage".
....just as the only reasons you have are because of your hatred of anyone who
doesn't believe as you do. (Free clue, since you need a few: same-sex
marriage isn't exactly a modern concept. It's recorded quite a ways back in
history -- even in Christian churches.)
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German shepard dog?
Leave it to an alleged "Christian" like you to bring *that* up. Is it too
much for you to figure out that marriage has historically been between
humans?
It's also historically been between a man and a woman.
Too bad that nettlesome little detail I mentioned gives the lie to that
opinion of yours.
At what point do you care? How far can people go without totally devaluing
the very concept of marriage?
A bit farther than YOU can stand, without devaluing it.
Is a marriage between a father and his ten year old daughter farther than
YOU can stand?
What part of "consenting adults" are you too stupid to understand, Chris?
I do not believe our Constitution grants special "RIGHTS" to people based
on their gender confusion.
Idiot. I have the right to marry the consenting adult of my choice --
because I'm heterosexual, thus the consenting adult is (by definition)
female. A homosexual doesn't have that right. How the hell is correcting
*that* error granting special rights? It's restoring equal rights.
It follows that women should have the right to walk around in public
topless,
which they already have, in a few places -- so go there and ***** at them.
Let me guess -- you're a regular at Black's Beach.
that men should have the right to use a public women's restroom,
Funny how some European countries can manage that and not collapse in anarchy,
isn't it?
and that 18 year old men should NOT have to register for selective service
(or 18 year old women SHOULD have to register).
There, you *might* have a point, but it's got nothing to do with the rest of
your whining. It doesn't bother me, but then, I registered the day I turned
18. (That was 31 years ago.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
07 Jun 2004 09:21:40 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekor84ng.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfz9889v1.fsf@fnord.io.com...
(Jackson's idiot quoting style repaired)
papajack37@sbcglobal.net (papa jack) writes:
[...]
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
No, but I've heard of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Well good for you.
I'm almost impressed.
Well good for you.
[...]
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry a 10-year old little
girl?
There *are* reasons for proscribing that.
Just as there are reasons for proscribing homosexual "marriage".
...just as the only reasons you have are because of your hatred of anyone
who
doesn't believe as you do.
I don't recall making such claim. Perhaps you might refresh my memory.
(Free clue, since you need a few: same-sex
marriage isn't exactly a modern concept. It's recorded quite a ways back
in
history -- even in Christian churches.)
Irrelevant clue.
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German shepard dog?
Leave it to an alleged "Christian" like you to bring *that* up. Is it
too
much for you to figure out that marriage has historically been between
humans?
It's also historically been between a man and a woman.
Too bad that nettlesome little detail I mentioned gives the lie to that
opinion of yours.
Not an opinion; a statement of FACT.
At what point do you care? How far can people go without totally
devaluing
the very concept of marriage?
A bit farther than YOU can stand, without devaluing it.
Is a marriage between a father and his ten year old daughter farther than
YOU can stand?
What part of "consenting adults" are you too stupid to understand, Chris?
Was that a "yes" or a "no"?
I do not believe our Constitution grants special "RIGHTS" to people
based
on their gender confusion.
Idiot. I have the right to marry the consenting adult of my choice --
because I'm heterosexual, thus the consenting adult is (by definition)
female. A homosexual doesn't have that right. How the hell is
correcting
*that* error granting special rights? It's restoring equal rights.
It follows that women should have the right to walk around in public
topless,
which they already have, in a few places -- so go there and ***** at them.
Let me guess -- you're a regular at Black's Beach.
Not in the least. Nice special pleading though. See what happens to a woman
who decides to walk topless down Broadway in New York City.
that men should have the right to use a public women's restroom,
Funny how some European countries can manage that and not collapse in
anarchy,
isn't it?
Irrelevant.
and that 18 year old men should NOT have to register for selective
service
(or 18 year old women SHOULD have to register).
There, you *might* have a point, but it's got nothing to do with the rest
of
your whining.
It has EVERYTHING to do with the rest of my "whining". "Equal rights";
remember?
It doesn't bother me, but then, I registered the day I turned
18.
Well good for you.
(That was 31 years ago.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
08 Jun 2004 12:00:36 AM |
|
|
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekor84ng.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfz9889v1.fsf@fnord.io.com...
(Jackson's idiot quoting style repaired)
papajack37@sbcglobal.net (papa jack) writes:
[...]
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
No, but I've heard of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Well good for you.
I'm almost impressed.
Well good for you.
I said "almost". I was momentarily surprised by your non-village-idiot
response enough to stop laughing for a second or two.
[...]
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry a 10-year old little
girl?
There *are* reasons for proscribing that.
Just as there are reasons for proscribing homosexual "marriage".
...just as the only reasons you have are because of your hatred of anyone
who doesn't believe as you do.
I don't recall making such claim. Perhaps you might refresh my memory.
You only demonstrate it (and your infatuation with stupidity) every time you
start pounding the keyboard.
(Free clue, since you need a few: same-sex marriage isn't exactly a modern
concept. It's recorded quite a ways back in history -- even in Christian
churches.)
Irrelevant clue.
It contradicts your assertion, so it's irrelevant? That says something about
you. (Not that you'll ever figure it out.)
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German shepard dog?
Leave it to an alleged "Christian" like you to bring *that* up. Is it
too much for you to figure out that marriage has historically been
between humans?
It's also historically been between a man and a woman.
Too bad that nettlesome little detail I mentioned gives the lie to that
opinion of yours.
Not an opinion; a statement of FACT.
Where's the proof of your FACT, dumbass? There are records of Eastern
Orthodox clergy performing such marriages. It might be irrelevant to a
professional idiot like you, but it doesn't do anything for proving your
assertion.
At what point do you care? How far can people go without totally
devaluing the very concept of marriage?
A bit farther than YOU can stand, without devaluing it.
Is a marriage between a father and his ten year old daughter farther than
YOU can stand?
What part of "consenting adults" are you too stupid to understand, Chris?
Was that a "yes" or a "no"?
You're obviously a student of Heishman's School of Reading Incomprehension.
Figure it out for yourself. People with average IQs are capable of doing that
much. What's your excuse?
I do not believe our Constitution grants special "RIGHTS" to people
based on their gender confusion.
Idiot. I have the right to marry the consenting adult of my choice --
because I'm heterosexual, thus the consenting adult is (by definition)
female. A homosexual doesn't have that right. How the hell is
correcting *that* error granting special rights? It's restoring equal
rights.
It follows that women should have the right to walk around in public
topless,
which they already have, in a few places -- so go there and ***** at them.
Let me guess -- you're a regular at Black's Beach.
Not in the least. Nice special pleading though. See what happens to a woman
who decides to walk topless down Broadway in New York City.
Broadway isn't one of those places. Try just about any public place in
Ontario, though -- for starters.
that men should have the right to use a public women's restroom,
Funny how some European countries can manage that and not collapse in
anarchy, isn't it?
Irrelevant.
You're one cowardly little git, aren't you?
and that 18 year old men should NOT have to register for selective service
(or 18 year old women SHOULD have to register).
There, you *might* have a point, but it's got nothing to do with the rest of
your whining.
It has EVERYTHING to do with the rest of my "whining". "Equal rights";
remember?
You have no idea of what you're whining about, Chris.
It doesn't bother me, but then, I registered the day I turned
18.
Well good for you.
So, when are YOU going to register? (How long until you qualify?)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
08 Jun 2004 12:26:14 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk7juilk3v.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekor84ng.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfz9889v1.fsf@fnord.io.com...
(Jackson's idiot quoting style repaired)
papajack37@sbcglobal.net (papa jack) writes:
[...]
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
No, but I've heard of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Well good for you.
I'm almost impressed.
Well good for you.
I said "almost". I was momentarily surprised by your non-village-idiot
response enough to stop laughing for a second or two.
Well good for you.
[...]
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry a 10-year old
little
girl?
There *are* reasons for proscribing that.
Just as there are reasons for proscribing homosexual "marriage".
...just as the only reasons you have are because of your hatred of
anyone
who doesn't believe as you do.
I don't recall making such claim. Perhaps you might refresh my memory.
You only demonstrate it (and your infatuation with stupidity) every time
you
start pounding the keyboard.
Precisely WHAT have I "pounded" on the keyboard that makes you believe that
which you claim. You do believe your own claim, correct?
(Free clue, since you need a few: same-sex marriage isn't exactly a
modern
concept. It's recorded quite a ways back in history -- even in
Christian
churches.)
Irrelevant clue.
It contradicts your assertion,
No it doesn't.
so it's irrelevant? That says something about
you. (Not that you'll ever figure it out.)
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German shepard dog?
Leave it to an alleged "Christian" like you to bring *that* up. Is
it
too much for you to figure out that marriage has historically been
between humans?
It's also historically been between a man and a woman.
Too bad that nettlesome little detail I mentioned gives the lie to that
opinion of yours.
Not an opinion; a statement of FACT.
Where's the proof of your FACT,
Open your eyes (if you can) and see what has been taking place for as far
back as your memory can take you.
dumbass? There are records of Eastern
Orthodox clergy performing such marriages. It might be irrelevant to a
professional idiot like you
Ad hominem.
, but it doesn't do anything for proving your
assertion.
At what point do you care? How far can people go without totally
devaluing the very concept of marriage?
A bit farther than YOU can stand, without devaluing it.
Is a marriage between a father and his ten year old daughter farther
than
YOU can stand?
What part of "consenting adults" are you too stupid to understand,
Chris?
Was that a "yes" or a "no"?
You're obviously a student of Heishman's School of Reading
Incomprehension.
Figure it out for yourself. People with average IQs are capable of doing
that
much. What's your excuse?
Do you always answer a question with a question?
I do not believe our Constitution grants special "RIGHTS" to people
based on their gender confusion.
Idiot. I have the right to marry the consenting adult of my
choice --
because I'm heterosexual, thus the consenting adult is (by
definition)
female. A homosexual doesn't have that right. How the hell is
correcting *that* error granting special rights? It's restoring
equal
rights.
It follows that women should have the right to walk around in public
topless,
which they already have, in a few places -- so go there and ***** at
them.
Let me guess -- you're a regular at Black's Beach.
Not in the least. Nice special pleading though. See what happens to a
woman
who decides to walk topless down Broadway in New York City.
Broadway isn't one of those places.
Broadway isn't one of WHAT places?
Try just about any public place in
Ontario, though -- for starters.
that men should have the right to use a public women's restroom,
Funny how some European countries can manage that and not collapse in
anarchy, isn't it?
Irrelevant.
You're one cowardly little git, aren't you?
In YOUR opinion, perhaps; but irrelevant to the discussion.
and that 18 year old men should NOT have to register for selective
service
(or 18 year old women SHOULD have to register).
There, you *might* have a point, but it's got nothing to do with the
rest of
your whining.
It has EVERYTHING to do with the rest of my "whining". "Equal rights";
remember?
You have no idea of what you're whining about, Chris.
Would you care to present your conclusion in syllogistic form?
It doesn't bother me, but then, I registered the day I turned
18.
Well good for you.
So, when are YOU going to register? (How long until you qualify?)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
08 Jun 2004 08:53:42 PM |
|
|
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk7juilk3v.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekor84ng.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfz9889v1.fsf@fnord.io.com...
(Jackson's idiot quoting style repaired)
papajack37@sbcglobal.net (papa jack) writes:
[...]
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
No, but I've heard of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Well good for you.
I'm almost impressed.
Well good for you.
I said "almost". I was momentarily surprised by your non-village-idiot
response enough to stop laughing for a second or two.
Well good for you.
You must make a living by being a professional parrot. (You certainly haven't
the wits to advance.)
[...]
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry a 10-year old little
girl?
There *are* reasons for proscribing that.
Just as there are reasons for proscribing homosexual "marriage".
...just as the only reasons you have are because of your hatred of anyone
who doesn't believe as you do.
I don't recall making such claim. Perhaps you might refresh my memory.
You only demonstrate it (and your infatuation with stupidity) every time you
start pounding the keyboard.
Precisely WHAT have I "pounded" on the keyboard that makes you believe that
which you claim. You do believe your own claim, correct?
Get back to me when you've finally learned the concept of a figure of speech.
(Free clue, since you need a few: same-sex marriage isn't exactly a
modern concept. It's recorded quite a ways back in history -- even in
Christian churches.)
Irrelevant clue.
It contradicts your assertion,
No it doesn't.
You're not agreeing with your pal IBenGettinHigh on his claim that same-sex
marriage didn't exist until late in the last century? That would be the wise
decision, considering history contradicts said assertion.
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German shepard dog?
Leave it to an alleged "Christian" like you to bring *that* up. Is it
too much for you to figure out that marriage has historically been
between humans?
It's also historically been between a man and a woman.
Too bad that nettlesome little detail I mentioned gives the lie to that
opinion of yours.
Not an opinion; a statement of FACT.
Where's the proof of your FACT,
Open your eyes (if you can) and see what has been taking place for as far
back as your memory can take you.
I hate to spoil your reverie, but the world DID exist before I was born.
dumbass? There are records of Eastern
Orthodox clergy performing such marriages. It might be irrelevant to a
professional idiot like you
Ad hominem.
Run away, cowardly ***** in San Diego. Show us what you're all about.
(On second thought, don't, as there might be youngsters accessing this
newsgroup.)
, but it doesn't do anything for proving your assertion.
....which you're too bust running away from, anyway.
At what point do you care? How far can people go without totally
devaluing the very concept of marriage?
A bit farther than YOU can stand, without devaluing it.
Is a marriage between a father and his ten year old daughter farther
than YOU can stand?
What part of "consenting adults" are you too stupid to understand, Chris?
Was that a "yes" or a "no"?
You're obviously a student of Heishman's School of Reading Incomprehension.
Figure it out for yourself. People with average IQs are capable of doing
that much. What's your excuse?
Do you always answer a question with a question?
No. I gave you the answer, right in front of your eyes. If you're too stupid
to figure it out, that's not my problem. No one else seems to have trouble
with it.
I do not believe our Constitution grants special "RIGHTS" to people
based on their gender confusion.
Idiot. I have the right to marry the consenting adult of my choice --
because I'm heterosexual, thus the consenting adult is (by definition)
female. A homosexual doesn't have that right. How the hell is
correcting *that* error granting special rights? It's restoring equal
rights.
It follows that women should have the right to walk around in public
topless,
which they already have, in a few places -- so go there and ***** at
them. Let me guess -- you're a regular at Black's Beach.
Not in the least. Nice special pleading though. See what happens to a woman
who decides to walk topless down Broadway in New York City.
Broadway isn't one of those places.
Broadway isn't one of WHAT places?
Do you have a defective memory, noisome child? Read your own words up there,
starting with your quote prefixed by five chevrons. Sheesh.
Try just about any public place in
Ontario, though -- for starters.
You just keep running away from those inconvenient observations, don't you?
You're still the same blithering idiot you were when you wandered in a few
years ago, and you show no signs of anything but more of the same complete
obliovusness to anything you don't want to answer to.
that men should have the right to use a public women's restroom,
Funny how some European countries can manage that and not collapse in
anarchy, isn't it?
Irrelevant.
You're one cowardly little git, aren't you?
In YOUR opinion, perhaps; but irrelevant to the discussion.
Since this "discussion" wouldn't be taking place if you weren't playing
stupid, it's relevant. Live with it, or die with it. It's your choice.
and that 18 year old men should NOT have to register for selective
service (or 18 year old women SHOULD have to register).
There, you *might* have a point, but it's got nothing to do with the
rest of your whining.
It has EVERYTHING to do with the rest of my "whining". "Equal rights";
remember?
You have no idea of what you're whining about, Chris.
Would you care to present your conclusion in syllogistic form?
Why bother? You're the same brain-transplant donor you've always been, in
this forum. (You may have equal *rights*, but your ineffable stupidity
assures you'll never attain equal privileges. Have a simply smurfy day.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
08 Jun 2004 10:43:11 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentijix.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk7juilk3v.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekor84ng.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfz9889v1.fsf@fnord.io.com...
(Jackson's idiot quoting style repaired)
papajack37@sbcglobal.net (papa jack) writes:
[...]
The quote from the platform says:
"-- 'the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of
society' --"
Have you heard of Sodom and Gomorroh?
No, but I've heard of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Well good for you.
I'm almost impressed.
Well good for you.
I said "almost". I was momentarily surprised by your non-village-idiot
response enough to stop laughing for a second or two.
Well good for you.
You must make a living by being a professional parrot. (You certainly
haven't
the wits to advance.)
Red herring, but thank you for your opinion just the same.
[...]
Do you care if a 40-year old man wants to marry a 10-year old
little
girl?
There *are* reasons for proscribing that.
Just as there are reasons for proscribing homosexual "marriage".
...just as the only reasons you have are because of your hatred of
anyone
who doesn't believe as you do.
I don't recall making such claim. Perhaps you might refresh my memory.
You only demonstrate it (and your infatuation with stupidity) every
time you
start pounding the keyboard.
Precisely WHAT have I "pounded" on the keyboard that makes you believe
that
which you claim. You do believe your own claim, correct?
Get back to me when you've finally learned the concept of a figure of
speech.
Like I asked, what have I "pounded" on the keyboard that makes you believe
your above claim?
(note: I have made the risky assumption that you DO believe that which you
claim)
(Free clue, since you need a few: same-sex marriage isn't exactly a
modern concept. It's recorded quite a ways back in history -- even
in
Christian churches.)
Irrelevant clue.
It contradicts your assertion,
No it doesn't.
You're not agreeing with your pal
MY pal?
IBenGettinHigh on his claim that same-sex
marriage didn't exist until late in the last century? That would be the
wise
decision, considering history contradicts said assertion.
Do you care if a woman wants to marry her German shepard dog?
Leave it to an alleged "Christian" like you to bring *that* up.
Is it
too much for you to figure out that marriage has historically
been
between humans?
It's also historically been between a man and a woman.
Too bad that nettlesome little detail I mentioned gives the lie to
that
opinion of yours.
Not an opinion; a statement of FACT.
Where's the proof of your FACT,
Open your eyes (if you can) and see what has been taking place for as far
back as your memory can take you.
I hate to spoil your reverie, but the world DID exist before I was born.
Your point?
dumbass? There are records of Eastern
Orthodox clergy performing such marriages. It might be irrelevant to a
professional idiot like you
Ad hominem.
Run away,
Please don't tell me what to do; I don't tell YOU what to do.
cowardly *****
Ad hominem.
in San Diego.
San Diego?
Show us what you're all about.
(On second thought, don't, as there might be youngsters accessing this
newsgroup.)
, but it doesn't do anything for proving your assertion.
...which you're too bust running away from, anyway.
Whatever are you talking about?
At what point do you care? How far can people go without
totally
devaluing the very concept of marriage?
A bit farther than YOU can stand, without devaluing it.
Is a marriage between a father and his ten year old daughter
farther
than YOU can stand?
What part of "consenting adults" are you too stupid to understand,
Chris?
Was that a "yes" or a "no"?
You're obviously a student of Heishman's School of Reading
Incomprehension.
Figure it out for yourself. People with average IQs are capable of
doing
that much. What's your excuse?
Do you always answer a question with a question?
No. I gave you the answer, right in front of your eyes.
I'm sorry, but I saw no "yes" or "no". If you don't know the answer either,
then I will not ask you again.
If you're too stupid
to figure it out, that's not my problem. No one else seems to have
trouble
with it.
I do not believe our Constitution grants special "RIGHTS" to
people
based on their gender confusion.
Idiot. I have the right to marry the consenting adult of my
choice --
because I'm heterosexual, thus the consenting adult is (by
definition)
female. A homosexual doesn't have that right. How the hell is
correcting *that* error granting special rights? It's restoring
equal
rights.
It follows that women should have the right to walk around in
public
topless,
which they already have, in a few places -- so go there and ***** at
them. Let me guess -- you're a regular at Black's Beach.
Not in the least. Nice special pleading though. See what happens to a
woman
who decides to walk topless down Broadway in New York City.
Broadway isn't one of those places.
Broadway isn't one of WHAT places?
Do you have a defective memory, noisome child? Read your own words up
there,
starting with your quote prefixed by five chevrons.
What's with the riddles? Assuming that you are referring to my "topless"
statement, Broadway not being one of those places is PRECISELY my point.
Sheesh.
Try just about any public place in
Ontario, though -- for starters.
You just keep running away from those inconvenient observations, don't
you?
You're still the same blithering idiot you were when you wandered in a few
years ago, and you show no signs of anything but more of the same complete
obliovusness to anything you don't want to answer to.
What the heck are you talking about?
that men should have the right to use a public women's restroom,
Funny how some European countries can manage that and not collapse
in
anarchy, isn't it?
Irrelevant.
You're one cowardly little git, aren't you?
In YOUR opinion, perhaps; but irrelevant to the discussion.
Since this "discussion" wouldn't be taking place if you weren't playing
stupid, it's relevant.
Your entire claim above is untrue.
Live with it, or die with it. It's your choice.
and that 18 year old men should NOT have to register for selective
service (or 18 year old women SHOULD have to register).
There, you *might* have a point, but it's got nothing to do with the
rest of your whining.
It has EVERYTHING to do with the rest of my "whining". "Equal rights";
remember?
You have no idea of what you're whining about, Chris.
Would you care to present your conclusion in syllogistic form?
Why bother?
Uhuh.
You're the same brain-transplant donor you've always been, in
this forum.
Ad hominem.
(You may have equal *rights*, but your ineffable stupidity
Ad hominem.
assures you'll never attain equal privileges. Have a simply smurfy day.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
08 Jun 2004 10:54:13 PM |
|
|
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to understand what you
read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to grade school until you
learn to speak what I assume is your native language. Either that, or you can
go find someone else to play your idiot's game. I have better ways of using
my time in this forum than to waste it on someone who clearly isn't interested
in dealing with his own ignorance.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
08 Jun 2004 11:52:13 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to understand what
you
read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to grade school until
you
learn to speak what I assume is your native language. Either that, or you
can
go find someone else to play your idiot's game. I have better ways of
using
my time in this forum than to waste it on someone who clearly isn't
interested
in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
09 Jun 2004 05:59:33 AM |
|
|
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to understand what
you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to grade school
until you learn to speak what I assume is your native language. Either
that, or you can go find someone else to play your idiot's game. I have
better ways of using my time in this forum than to waste it on someone who
clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
....evidenced every time you respond. If you're to the point where you don't
know that you don't know, why bother with trying to enlighten you? Your mind
(assuming you have one) was made up long ago, and you've obviously decided
you're not going to risk being confused by inconvenient facts.
--
Patrick "no film at 10, natch" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
09 Jun 2004 03:50:16 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentm1yi.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to understand
what
you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to grade school
until you learn to speak what I assume is your native language. Either
that, or you can go find someone else to play your idiot's game. I
have
better ways of using my time in this forum than to waste it on someone
who
clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
...evidenced every time you respond.
Again, such ignorance being?
If you're to the point where you don't
know that you don't know, why bother with trying to enlighten you? Your
mind
(assuming you have one) was made up long ago, and you've obviously decided
you're not going to risk being confused by inconvenient facts.
Untrue.
--
Patrick "no film at 10, natch" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
09 Jun 2004 10:58:56 PM |
|
|
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentm1yi.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to understand what
you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to grade school
until you learn to speak what I assume is your native language. Either
that, or you can go find someone else to play your idiot's game. I have
better ways of using my time in this forum than to waste it on someone
who clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
...evidenced every time you respond.
Again, such ignorance being?
Learn to read English, drooling dolt. (For all you know, I might be a little
less hostile to your act in this newsgroup.)
If you're to the point where you don't know that you don't know, why bother
with trying to enlighten you? Your mind (assuming you have one) was made
up long ago, and you've obviously decided you're not going to risk being
confused by inconvenient facts.
Untrue.
The evidence strongly suggests that you're either truly stupid beyond belief,
or you're lying and not doing an even remotely credible job of it. Choose one
of the two.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
09 Jun 2004 11:16:04 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfi0awsf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentm1yi.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to understand
what
you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to grade
school
until you learn to speak what I assume is your native language.
Either
that, or you can go find someone else to play your idiot's game. I
have
better ways of using my time in this forum than to waste it on
someone
who clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
...evidenced every time you respond.
Again, such ignorance being?
Learn to read English,
Please don't tell me what to do; I don't tell YOU what to do.
drooling dolt. (For all you know, I might be a little
less hostile to your act in this newsgroup.)
If you're to the point where you don't know that you don't know, why
bother
with trying to enlighten you? Your mind (assuming you have one) was
made
up long ago, and you've obviously decided you're not going to risk
being
confused by inconvenient facts.
Untrue.
The evidence strongly suggests that you're either truly stupid beyond
belief,
or you're lying and not doing an even remotely credible job of it. Choose
one
of the two.
False dilemma.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
10 Jun 2004 10:06:51 AM |
|
|
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote in news:2hRxc.8579$fZ1.1152@fed1read03:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfi0awsf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentm1yi.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to
understand
what
you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to
grade
school
until you learn to speak what I assume is your native language.
Either
that, or you can go find someone else to play your idiot's
game. I
have
better ways of using my time in this forum than to waste it on
someone
who clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
...evidenced every time you respond.
Again, such ignorance being?
Learn to read English,
Please don't tell me what to do; I don't tell YOU what to do.
Then take is as a suggestion rather than a demand, idiot troll.
drooling dolt. (For all you know, I might be a little
less hostile to your act in this newsgroup.)
If you're to the point where you don't know that you don't know,
why
bother
with trying to enlighten you? Your mind (assuming you have one)
was
made
up long ago, and you've obviously decided you're not going to risk
being
confused by inconvenient facts.
Untrue.
The evidence strongly suggests that you're either truly stupid beyond
belief,
or you're lying and not doing an even remotely credible job of it.
Choose
one
of the two.
False dilemma.
Not so, idiot troll.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston,
Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston
Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
10 Jun 2004 11:06:01 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns9504528D4BEA0SD@153.80.109.11>, Bob wrote:
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote in news:2hRxc.8579$fZ1.1152@fed1read03:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfi0awsf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentm1yi.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to
understand
what
you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to
grade
school
until you learn to speak what I assume is your native language.
Either
that, or you can go find someone else to play your idiot's
game. I
have
better ways of using my time in this forum than to waste it on
someone
who clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
...evidenced every time you respond.
Again, such ignorance being?
Learn to read English,
Please don't tell me what to do; I don't tell YOU what to do.
Then take is as a suggestion rather than a demand, idiot troll.
drooling dolt. (For all you know, I might be a little
less hostile to your act in this newsgroup.)
If you're to the point where you don't know that you don't know,
why
bother
with trying to enlighten you? Your mind (assuming you have one)
was
made
up long ago, and you've obviously decided you're not going to risk
being
confused by inconvenient facts.
Untrue.
The evidence strongly suggests that you're either truly stupid beyond
belief,
or you're lying and not doing an even remotely credible job of it.
Choose
one
of the two.
False dilemma.
Not so, idiot troll.
Of course it isn't so. Chris falls back on this *****, which he
nearly always uses wrongly, when he has on other answer, which is
often. It impresses his trailer trash friends, so he hopes it will
impress us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
10 Jun 2004 11:38:17 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in
news:100620042106013554%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com:
In article <Xns9504528D4BEA0SD@153.80.109.11>, Bob wrote:
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote in news:2hRxc.8579$fZ1.1152@fed1read03:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfi0awsf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentm1yi.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to
understand what you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly
dragged back to grade school until you learn to speak what I
assume is your native language. Either that, or you can go find
someone else to play your idiot's game. I have better ways of
using my time in this forum than to waste it on someone who
clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
...evidenced every time you respond.
Again, such ignorance being?
Learn to read English,
Please don't tell me what to do; I don't tell YOU what to do.
Then take is as a suggestion rather than a demand, idiot troll.
drooling dolt. (For all you know, I might be a little
less hostile to your act in this newsgroup.)
If you're to the point where you don't know that you don't know,
why bother with trying to enlighten you? Your mind (assuming you
have one) was made up long ago, and you've obviously decided
you're not going to risk being confused by inconvenient facts.
Untrue.
The evidence strongly suggests that you're either truly stupid beyond
belief, or you're lying and not doing an even remotely credible job
of it. Choose
one
of the two.
False dilemma.
Not so, idiot troll.
Of course it isn't so. Chris falls back on this *****, which he
nearly always uses wrongly, when he has on other answer, which is
often. It impresses his trailer trash friends, so he hopes it will
impress us.
Too bad we have to dash Chris's hopes....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
11 Jun 2004 02:45:42 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:100620042106013554%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <Xns9504528D4BEA0SD@153.80.109.11>, Bob wrote:
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote in news:2hRxc.8579$fZ1.1152@fed1read03:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfi0awsf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentm1yi.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to
understand
what
you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to
grade
school
until you learn to speak what I assume is your native language.
Either
that, or you can go find someone else to play your idiot's
game. I
have
better ways of using my time in this forum than to waste it on
someone
who clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
...evidenced every time you respond.
Again, such ignorance being?
Learn to read English,
Please don't tell me what to do; I don't tell YOU what to do.
Then take is as a suggestion rather than a demand, idiot troll.
drooling dolt. (For all you know, I might be a little
less hostile to your act in this newsgroup.)
If you're to the point where you don't know that you don't know,
why
bother
with trying to enlighten you? Your mind (assuming you have one)
was
made
up long ago, and you've obviously decided you're not going to risk
being
confused by inconvenient facts.
Untrue.
The evidence strongly suggests that you're either truly stupid beyond
belief,
or you're lying and not doing an even remotely credible job of it.
Choose
one
of the two.
False dilemma.
Not so, idiot troll.
Of course it isn't so. Chris falls back on this *****, which he
nearly always uses wrongly, when he has on other answer, which is
often. It impresses his trailer trash friends, so he hopes it will
impress us.
With all due respect, what the heck are you talking about?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas GOP Platform |
12 Jun 2004 01:18:32 PM |
|
|
In article <Xrdyc.12613$fZ1.980@fed1read03>, Chris <reddd@juno.com>
wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <DumpBushInNovember@usa.com> wrote in message
news:100620042106013554%DumpBushInNovember@usa.com...
In article <Xns9504528D4BEA0SD@153.80.109.11>, Bob wrote:
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> wrote in news:2hRxc.8579$fZ1.1152@fed1read03:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfi0awsf.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoentm1yi.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Chris" <reddd@juno.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmd5e68q.fsf@fnord.io.com...
Since you've given ample evidence of being too stupid to
understand
what
you read, Chris, I suggest you be forcibly dragged back to
grade
school
until you learn to speak what I assume is your native language.
Either
that, or you can go find someone else to play your idiot's
game. I
have
better ways of using my time in this forum than to waste it on
someone
who clearly isn't interested in dealing with his own ignorance.
Such ignorance being?
...evidenced every time you respond.
Again, such ignorance being?
Learn to read English,
Please don't tell me what to do; I don't tell YOU what to do.
Then take is as a suggestion rather than a demand, idiot troll.
drooling dolt. (For all you know, I might be a little
less hostile to your act in this newsgroup.)
If you're to the point where you don't know that you don't know,
why
bother
with trying to enlighten you? Your mind (assuming you have one)
was
made
up long ago, and you've obviously decided you're not going to risk
being
confused by inconvenient facts.
Untrue.
The evidence strongly suggests that you're either truly stupid beyond
belief,
or you're lying and not doing an even remotely credible job of it.
Choose
one
of the two.
False dilemma.
Not so, idiot troll.
Of course it isn't so. Chris falls back on this *****, which he
nearly always uses wrongly, when he has on other answer, which is
often. It impresses his trailer trash friends, so he hopes it will
impress us.
With all due respect, what the heck are you talking about?
Lost again?
.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
