Science > Abortion > Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
24 Mar 2007 09:11:55 PM |
| Object: |
Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
http://www.lifenews.com/state2182.html
Austin, TX (LifeNews.com) -- A Texas state legislator has an idea on how to
reduce the number of abortions in the state. Under his legislative proposal,
the state would pay women $500 apiece who choose adoption over abortion.
Sen. Dan Patrick, a Houston Republican, says the proposal would provide more
incentive for women to opt against an abortion but criticism call Senate
Bill 1567 a baby selling scheme.
"We want that lady to have an incentive that makes her stop and think about
having an abortion and that gives her a reason to put her baby up for
adoption," Patrick told AP. "My goal is to save as many babies as we
possibly can."
"We're just giving someone an incentive to put your baby up for adoption,"
he said. "Then the baby goes through the normal adoptive process."
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
25 Mar 2007 03:08:10 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
http://www.lifenews.com/state2182.html
Austin, TX (LifeNews.com) -- A Texas state legislator has an idea on how to
reduce the number of abortions in the state. Under his legislative proposal,
the state would pay women $500 apiece who choose adoption over abortion.
Sen. Dan Patrick, a Houston Republican, says the proposal would provide more
incentive for women to opt against an abortion but criticism call Senate
Bill 1567 a baby selling scheme.
"We want that lady to have an incentive that makes her stop and think about
having an abortion and that gives her a reason to put her baby up for
adoption," Patrick told AP. "My goal is to save as many babies as we
possibly can."
"We're just giving someone an incentive to put your baby up for adoption,"
he said. "Then the baby goes through the normal adoptive process."
That's par for the course for the babbling idiot who owns a Houston AM station
that, on a good day, can actually be heard as far as ten miles away from the
transmitter out in Harris County. He's been a feeble joke in the Senate's GOP
contingent.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Omaha 10, Houston 2 (March 24)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 30 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dh" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
25 Mar 2007 03:19:35 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1174788856_2155@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
http://www.lifenews.com/state2182.html
Austin, TX (LifeNews.com) -- A Texas state legislator has an idea on how
to reduce the number of abortions in the state. Under his legislative
proposal, the state would pay women $500 apiece who choose adoption over
abortion.
Sen. Dan Patrick, a Houston Republican, says the proposal would provide
more incentive for women to opt against an abortion but criticism call
Senate Bill 1567 a baby selling scheme.
"We want that lady to have an incentive that makes her stop and think
about having an abortion and that gives her a reason to put her baby up
for adoption," Patrick told AP. "My goal is to save as many babies as we
possibly can."
"We're just giving someone an incentive to put your baby up for adoption,"
he said. "Then the baby goes through the normal adoptive process."
So women in Texas with no scruples whatever will be able to make an extra
$500 every 10 monuts or so?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Go Mavs" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
25 Mar 2007 03:43:43 AM |
|
|
Abortion is sometimes necessary... in the case of rape (and especially
incestuour rape), health, and incest. I believe it should be used rarely but
I also agree with this law.
With that said, where do you get the idea that 500$ is worth it for most
cases?
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1174788856_2155@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
http://www.lifenews.com/state2182.html
Austin, TX (LifeNews.com) -- A Texas state legislator has an idea on how
to reduce the number of abortions in the state. Under his legislative
proposal, the state would pay women $500 apiece who choose adoption over
abortion.
Sen. Dan Patrick, a Houston Republican, says the proposal would provide
more incentive for women to opt against an abortion but criticism call
Senate Bill 1567 a baby selling scheme.
"We want that lady to have an incentive that makes her stop and think
about having an abortion and that gives her a reason to put her baby up
for adoption," Patrick told AP. "My goal is to save as many babies as we
possibly can."
"We're just giving someone an incentive to put your baby up for adoption,"
he said. "Then the baby goes through the normal adoptive process."
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
25 Mar 2007 05:28:09 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:43:43 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Abortion is sometimes necessary... in the case of rape (and especially
incestuour rape), health, and incest. I believe it should be used rarely but
I also agree with this law.
If abortion is killing a innocent child, why is the child that is the
result of rape or incest, any different from a child that began from a
careless moment ?
Why should that child be denied life. Or his this about punishing
women for having sex for pleasure?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Go Mavs" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
25 Mar 2007 05:03:32 PM |
|
|
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:mitd03le12uq3iifs4eu4na6390m01ujn1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:43:43 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Abortion is sometimes necessary... in the case of rape (and especially
incestuour rape), health, and incest. I believe it should be used rarely
but
I also agree with this law.
If abortion is killing a innocent child, why is the child that is the
result of rape or incest, any different from a child that began from a
careless moment ?
Why should that child be denied life. Or his this about punishing
women for having sex for pleasure?
It's not a black or white issue as much as you want to make it one. In fact
both sides want to make this a black or white issue and it isnt. The reason
abortion should be allowed in cases of rape, incest, or health, are because
they all have long lasting mental and genetic complications.
as with most other controversial issues, abortion is an issue that can only
successfully be addressed by dealing with root problems. almost any legal
impediment to abortion will fail (some more drastically than others) because
women will always find themselves in a position where an abortion seems a
viable option. unless we address the problems that lead them to be in that
position. the only real answer to the problem of abortion will be education
and health care.
this particular proposal strikes me as unethical and impractical. as has
already been pointed out, it's certainly not sufficient monetary
compensation. perhaps if it were coupled with complete coverage for any
medical expenses associated with pregnancy and childbirth, it would be a
more viable financial incentive. but that's putting aside the question of
ethics. such a statute could very easily be abused in much the same way
selling blood or organs could be--conceivably even against the will of the
mother.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
26 Mar 2007 04:27:24 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:03:32 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:mitd03le12uq3iifs4eu4na6390m01ujn1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:43:43 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Abortion is sometimes necessary... in the case of rape (and especially
incestuour rape), health, and incest. I believe it should be used rarely
but
I also agree with this law.
If abortion is killing a innocent child, why is the child that is the
result of rape or incest, any different from a child that began from a
careless moment ?
Why should that child be denied life. Or his this about punishing
women for having sex for pleasure?
It's not a black or white issue as much as you want to make it one.
But it is a black and white issue. Either a woman has a right to
control her own body, or she doesn't. Either the fetus is a person
with the rights to the woman's body, or is not. If the fetus is a
person with rights superior to the woman, then the woman is not a
person, and has no rights. If a fetus has the right to be carried to
term, regardless of the woman's wishes, then all fetus have the same
rights. Even the fetus of a rapist, or the result of incest, black and
white who has the right, fetus or woman. Or do we allow small brained
big mouthed self righteous bigots rule our lives.
My position should be very clear, I fully support the woman's rights
to choose.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Go Mavs" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
27 Mar 2007 02:42:27 AM |
|
|
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:t2eg03d8sgp7fnic7ou3rte6a1a0kt66ik@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:03:32 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:mitd03le12uq3iifs4eu4na6390m01ujn1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:43:43 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Abortion is sometimes necessary... in the case of rape (and especially
incestuour rape), health, and incest. I believe it should be used rarely
but
I also agree with this law.
If abortion is killing a innocent child, why is the child that is the
result of rape or incest, any different from a child that began from a
careless moment ?
Why should that child be denied life. Or his this about punishing
women for having sex for pleasure?
It's not a black or white issue as much as you want to make it one.
But it is a black and white issue. Either a woman has a right to
control her own body, or she doesn't.
Nope! Society decides what is acceptable for abortion and what is not
acceptable. Recently they have decided they are not for third trimester
abortions.
Also, when a woman wants to keep her baby, and gets punched in the stomach
by her jealous boyfriend who has the intent to kill the baby... That's
murder..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
27 Mar 2007 09:59:31 AM |
|
|
Go Mavs <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
"Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:mitd03le12uq3iifs4eu4na6390m01ujn1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:43:43 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Abortion is sometimes necessary... in the case of rape (and especially
incestuour rape), health, and incest. I believe it should be used rarely
but
I also agree with this law.
If abortion is killing a innocent child, why is the child that is the
result of rape or incest, any different from a child that began from a
careless moment ?
Why should that child be denied life. Or his this about punishing
women for having sex for pleasure?
It's not a black or white issue as much as you want to make it one.
But it is a black and white issue. Either a woman has a right to
control her own body, or she doesn't.
Nope! Society decides what is acceptable for abortion and what is not
acceptable.
Non sequitur.
Recently they have decided they are not for third trimester
abortions.
But she still gets to induce delivery.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
27 Mar 2007 06:02:08 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:42:27 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:t2eg03d8sgp7fnic7ou3rte6a1a0kt66ik@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:03:32 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:mitd03le12uq3iifs4eu4na6390m01ujn1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:43:43 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Abortion is sometimes necessary... in the case of rape (and especially
incestuour rape), health, and incest. I believe it should be used rarely
but
I also agree with this law.
If abortion is killing a innocent child, why is the child that is the
result of rape or incest, any different from a child that began from a
careless moment ?
Why should that child be denied life. Or his this about punishing
women for having sex for pleasure?
It's not a black or white issue as much as you want to make it one.
But it is a black and white issue. Either a woman has a right to
control her own body, or she doesn't.
Nope! Society decides what is acceptable for abortion and what is not
acceptable. Recently they have decided they are not for third trimester
abortions.
Red herring, after the second trimester, a induced premature
delivery will result in a live baby. That will need intensive medical
care. However some times the fetus has serious defects and it's best
to terminate the pregnancy. Which some nosy busybodies object to, they
feel that woman should suffer a needless pregnancy, and take care of a
defective child. This is a criminal limitation on the rights of a
woman.
Also, when a woman wants to keep her baby, and gets punched in the stomach
by her jealous boyfriend who has the intent to kill the baby... That's
murder..
Yes, and if the boy friend or husband or anyone else kills a
pregnant woman, they are guilty of two murders. BTW no one can order a
woman to have a abortion.
That's part of a woman right to choose. Another right that
pro-lifers tend to ignore if their daughter is pregnant and unmarried.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Go Mavs" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
27 Mar 2007 04:40:37 PM |
|
|
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:gj7j0311smibrn7dq93gg770jnvnvmcapi@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:42:27 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Red herring,
Not at all. That alone makes abortion a non-black and white issue.
after the second trimester, a induced premature
delivery will result in a live baby. That will need intensive medical
care. However some times the fetus has serious defects and it's best
to terminate the pregnancy. Which some nosy busybodies object to, they
feel that woman should suffer a needless pregnancy, and take care of a
defective child. This is a criminal limitation on the rights of a
woman.
Also, when a woman wants to keep her baby, and gets punched in the stomach
by her jealous boyfriend who has the intent to kill the baby... That's
murder..
Yes, and if the boy friend or husband or anyone else kills a
pregnant woman, they are guilty of two murders. BTW no one can order a
woman to have a abortion.
That's part of a woman right to choose. Another right that
pro-lifers tend to ignore if their daughter is pregnant and unmarried.
But the pro-choicers are trying to make it to where the baby is not
recognized in such a situation because they feel it bolsters the
pro-choicers opinions. Vice versa for the pro-choicers who want to make it
completely illegal.
The facts are that what makes it a non black or white issue is that even
though it's legal, there are limitations and thats the way it should be. I
am for a womans right to chose. I am not for third trimester abortions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
28 Mar 2007 05:42:34 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:40:37 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:gj7j0311smibrn7dq93gg770jnvnvmcapi@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:42:27 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Red herring,
Not at all. That alone makes abortion a non-black and white issue.
after the second trimester, a induced premature
delivery will result in a live baby. That will need intensive medical
care. However some times the fetus has serious defects and it's best
to terminate the pregnancy. Which some nosy busybodies object to, they
feel that woman should suffer a needless pregnancy, and take care of a
defective child. This is a criminal limitation on the rights of a
woman.
Also, when a woman wants to keep her baby, and gets punched in the stomach
by her jealous boyfriend who has the intent to kill the baby... That's
murder..
Yes, and if the boy friend or husband or anyone else kills a
pregnant woman, they are guilty of two murders. BTW no one can order a
woman to have a abortion.
That's part of a woman right to choose. Another right that
pro-lifers tend to ignore if their daughter is pregnant and unmarried.
But the pro-choicers are trying to make it to where the baby is not
recognized in such a situation because they feel it bolsters the
pro-choicers opinions. Vice versa for the pro-choicers who want to make it
completely illegal.
The facts are that what makes it a non black or white issue is that even
though it's legal, there are limitations and thats the way it should be. I
am for a womans right to chose. I am not for third trimester abortions.
You support a woman's right to choose, as long as you approve of her
choice? Because you are all knowing, and anyone that disagrees with
you, is wrong. Nothing is gray to a bigot, and no one but a bigot has
the right to decide. Must be great to be so smart and self assured.
Tell me can you kiss your own *****?
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
27 Mar 2007 04:46:42 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:40:37 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
"Robert" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:gj7j0311smibrn7dq93gg770jnvnvmcapi@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:42:27 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Red herring,
Not at all. That alone makes abortion a non-black and white issue.
after the second trimester, a induced premature
delivery will result in a live baby. That will need intensive medical
care. However some times the fetus has serious defects and it's best
to terminate the pregnancy. Which some nosy busybodies object to, they
feel that woman should suffer a needless pregnancy, and take care of a
defective child. This is a criminal limitation on the rights of a
woman.
Also, when a woman wants to keep her baby, and gets punched in the stomach
by her jealous boyfriend who has the intent to kill the baby... That's
murder..
Yes, and if the boy friend or husband or anyone else kills a
pregnant woman, they are guilty of two murders. BTW no one can order a
woman to have a abortion.
That's part of a woman right to choose. Another right that
pro-lifers tend to ignore if their daughter is pregnant and unmarried.
But the pro-choicers are trying to make it to where the baby is not
recognized in such a situation because they feel it bolsters the
pro-choicers opinions. Vice versa for the pro-choicers who want to make it
completely illegal.
Why do so many anti-abortion activists mis-represent people's
positions to the point of outright lying?
The facts are that what makes it a non black or white issue is that even
though it's legal, there are limitations and thats the way it should be. I
am for a womans right to chose. I am not for third trimester abortions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lars Eighner" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
25 Mar 2007 03:48:17 PM |
|
|
In our last episode,
<mitd03le12uq3iifs4eu4na6390m01ujn1@4ax.com>,
the lovely and talented Robert
broadcast on tx.politics:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:43:43 GMT, "Go Mavs" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote:
Abortion is sometimes necessary... in the case of rape (and especially
incestuour rape), health, and incest. I believe it should be used rarely but
I also agree with this law.
If abortion is killing a innocent child,
It isn't.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 666 days to go.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
25 Mar 2007 01:39:27 AM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
Just like you have no reason to kill children but do so anyway.
Austin, TX (LifeNews.com) -- A Texas state legislator has an idea on how to
reduce the number of abortions in the state. Under his legislative proposal,
the state would pay women $500 apiece who choose adoption over abortion.
LOL! That's a fraction of the medical bills. Maybe if they made that
$10,000 it would be meaningful, but then these pro-liars are nothing
if not stinking hypocrities, and for them to pay real money would mean
that they'd have to make some sacrifices.
Sen. Dan Patrick, a Houston Republican,
Figures. Another right-wing fascist who wants to force people to
obey.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
24 Mar 2007 09:59:53 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:11:55 -0400 there was an Ancient "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
This will be wonderful news for my friend with a severe heart
condition. Why, $500 more than balances the likelihood of her death
during labor should she ever go to term.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
24 Mar 2007 09:23:44 PM |
|
|
On 25 Mrz., 04:11, "J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
It won't pass and no babies are being killed. Stop inventing things.
http://www.lifenews.com/state2182.html
If you want to be taken seriously, how about using credible sources?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pinch" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
27 Mar 2007 08:57:08 AM |
|
|
On Mar 24, 10:11 pm, "J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
http://www.lifenews.com/state2182.html
Austin, TX (LifeNews.com) -- A Texas state legislator has an idea on how to
reduce the number of abortions in the state. Under his legislative proposal,
the state would pay women $500 apiece who choose adoption over abortion.
ROTFL!
$500 may pay for a couple of large plasters, a calibrated medicine cup
with two painkillers in it and a doctor to say good morning to her
patient; but what it's NOT going to do is to pay the thousands of
dollars needed for the pregnant women's prenantal medical/childbirth
hospital bills, her time and extensive needs while she's pregnant for
idiots like yourself.
Are you or the lunatic who's proposing this inane legislation going to
come up with about ten to fifteen grand in cash per pregnant
woman...no, because it'd mean you'd have to sacrifice something for
your beliefs, which is something a yellow-bellied coward such as
yourself isn't about to do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
27 Mar 2007 09:49:06 AM |
|
|
Pinch wrote:
On Mar 24, 10:11 pm, "J Young" <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
Austin, TX (LifeNews.com) -- A Texas state legislator has an idea on how to
reduce the number of abortions in the state. Under his legislative proposal,
the state would pay women $500 apiece who choose adoption over abortion.
ROTFL!
$500 may pay for a couple of large plasters, a calibrated medicine cup
with two painkillers in it and a doctor to say good morning to her
It's a recruiting effort for the right-wing religious community.
If a woman who cannot raise a baby has one anyway, the
right-wingers will take the baby away and raise it as one of
their own.
They have to do this because, after preaching *against* sex for
so long, they've devolved into an unsustainable gene pool. They
need either an infusion of new blood, or to relax the taboo
against incest - just to keep their numbers up.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
25 Mar 2007 01:22:06 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:11:55 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id <1174788856_2155@sp6iad.superfeed.net>
wrote:
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
The freedom of choice requires no excuse or reason. It simply allows
a free choice of what course of action to take.
If it passes no more federal money should be given to the state for
any reason - it is obvious they have enough to throw away.
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Texas Legislator Would Pay Women Who Pick Adoption Over Abortion |
24 Mar 2007 09:31:29 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:11:55 -0400, J Young wrote:
When this piece of legislation passes, and there's no good reason why it
shouldn't, women will be left without any excuses to abort their babies
lives.
You are as deep a thinker as the fuckwit Texas legislator proposing this
bill. Pregnancy and childbirth are still much more dangerous than
elective abortion, even if you are being bribed not to have an abortion.
I think that provides a powerful 'excuse'.
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
