The Pictures Speak for Themselves



 Science > Abortion > The Pictures Speak for Themselves

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Sam"
Date: 23 Jul 2003 01:53:12 PM
Object: The Pictures Speak for Themselves
Here are pictures that the radical pro-abortion movement seem to want
to prevent people from seeing. Here is it without any further comments
right now.
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp
.

User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: The Pictures Speak for Themselves 24 Jul 2003 01:08:31 PM
"John J. Pitri dish" <nospam@semi.nu> wrote in message
news:3F1FC79C.F68EC421@semi.nu...

This must be from Donald Duck a real quack!

Oh dear....not the "Donal Duck" insult! I am incapacitated by your onslaught
of intellectual prowess!!
How fucking lame.
Sam has a mood swing every few days and posts this same *****. And since
you didn't bother to READ what I wrote (i.e. the pictures are on the
internet) then I will just understand that you are an illiterate fuckstain
that can't tell the difference between "fetus" and "baby."
That would make you a moron without much to say worth listening to.
Vive la killfile, idiot.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104


The other Donald wrote:

"Sam" <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote in message
news:5b6a2e7d.0307231053.2379457b@posting.google.com...

Here are pictures that the radical pro-abortion movement seem to want
to prevent people from seeing. Here is it without any further comments
right now.

http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp


How many times are you going to post the same *****?

Here are pictures that the radical pro-abortion movement seem to want
to prevent people from seeing.


*****. They're on the INTERNET!! Anyone can see them. Jeezus, you're

a

dumb sonofabitch!

Here is it without any further comments
right now.


We've not only seen it the last FOUR times you posted them, but debunked
them an equal number of times. You're worse than a cocker spaniel with a
tennis ball.


.

User: "Galen Hekhuis"

Title: Re: The Pictures Speak for Themselves 23 Jul 2003 01:59:24 PM
On 23 Jul 2003 11:53:12 -0700,
(Sam) wrote:

Here are pictures that the radical pro-abortion movement seem to want
to prevent people from seeing. Here is it without any further comments
right now.

http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp

My God! They're naked! Have you no shame?
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA

A penny saved gathers no moss
.

User: "rms1"

Title: Re: The Pictures Speak for Themselves 25 Aug 2003 03:26:24 PM
Sam <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote in message
news:5b6a2e7d.0307231053.2379457b@posting.google.com...

Here are pictures that the radical pro-abortion movement seem to want
to prevent people from seeing. Here is it without any further comments
right now.

http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/920645.asp

People who support abortion rights fear no photos, nor those who attempt to
distort.
.
User: "Pat Winstanley"

Title: Re: The Pictures Speak for Themselves 25 Aug 2003 08:10:48 PM
In article <Qhu2b.113638$0v4.8103615@bgtnsc04-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
says...


Sam <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote in message
news:5b6a2e7d.0307231053.2379457b@posting.google.com...

Here are pictures that the radical pro-abortion movement seem to want
to prevent people from seeing. Here is it without any further comments
right now.


People who support abortion rights fear no photos, nor those who attempt to
distort.



However people who claim a photograph shows something it doesn't show
should not have their lies deliberately propagated!
.
User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: The Pictures Speak for Themselves 26 Aug 2003 02:06:58 PM
"Adam H." <thisisnot@realaddress.com> wrote in message
news:gm8mkvcd0b04s51vkaqaildi4mjhel12tr@4ax.com...

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:24:13 +1200,

wrote:

Pat Winstanley wrote:


In article <Qhu2b.113638$0v4.8103615@bgtnsc04-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,

says...


Sam <sa836284@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu> wrote in message
news:5b6a2e7d.0307231053.2379457b@posting.google.com...

Here are pictures that the radical pro-abortion movement seem to

want

to prevent people from seeing. Here is it without any further

comments

right now.


People who support abortion rights fear no photos, nor those who

attempt to

distort.




However people who claim a photograph shows something it doesn't show
should not have their lies deliberately propagated!


Yeah? That coupled with the fact that some parents want to see their

child

before its born - and keep the photos of it.


Yah, right. I know people who have pictures of their car on the
assembly line. Was it a car then?


Conclusion: You're an insane pro-abortion nut, with no grip on the

reality

that we all share.

What do you think of that?


I think that you're a know-nothing moron with no backup for your
arguments but the usual emotional deception. When you get some facts,
come back and see us.

We could only pray for such a day, Adam, because then they would all have to
*****. They have no facts, only their "baaaaayyyyy-beeee" whining.
***** 'em.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104



---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson

.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Morons Expose Themselves Yet Again WAS: Are you Canadian? Do you recognise this?
Re: David Irving: Jews should ask themselves why they are hated
Re: David Irving: Jews should ask themselves why they are hated
Re: David Irving: Jews should ask themselves why they are hated
Survey: One Out of Five Americans consider themselves Holy
Bush Cry Babies Upset That Kerry's People Used Naughty Words (re: NeoCons Can Go ***** Themselves)
Virgin girls may want to "break themselves in"
Nobody's Body Belongs Only to Themselves!
Re: David Irving: Jews should ask themselves why they are hated
Re: Stupid Bigots Expose Themselves Yet Again: IN: Stupid Yids kill 4 UN Observers - China is PISSED
Re: David Irving: Jews should ask themselves why they are hated
Pro-Choice worksheet entitled "A Quiz for Those Who Call Themselves Pro-choice"
Yids refer to themselves as yids. (was Re: Gadzooks, Harry Potter is Jewish!)
Re: David Irving: Jews should ask themselves why they are hated
Re: David Irving: Jews should ask themselves why they are hated
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER