If you're like me,

If you're like me, then you're sick and tired of Kerry and his Democrat
cohorts lying out of their pie-holes, blaming President Bush for a
recession (and the consequential job losses) that CLINTON caused. The
polls that show Kerry ahead cite the reason as "Bush cost us too many
jobs." So, we can reverse that perception by merely getting the truth out
-- and impeaching the Democrats' credibility in the process.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1071821/posts

The death-drop of the stock market did not begin with the Bush
administration in January 2001, says the congressional Joint Economic
Committee (JEC), but in March 2000 under the Clinton administration when
it began its all-out attack on the entrepreneurs of the booming U.S.
high-tech industry.

Indeed, The Economist reports that this poisoning of
the economic stream even may have begun in the late 1990s. According to
JEC Chairman Rep. Jim Saxton, "The 2000 NASDAQ collapse also corroborates
a variety of other data indicating that a sharp economic slowdown was
under way by the middle of 2000."

The JEC also found that job losses began under Clinton as well:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1071825/posts

Virtually all of the net payroll job loss in recent years is accounted for
by the manufacturing sector, and this decline in factory jobs began before
the current Administration took office, Vice Chairman Jim Saxton said
today. Opponents of the Administration have repeatedly claimed that its
policies have caused the decline in manufacturing employment, but fail to
explain how this trend began long before any changes in policy took place.
The facts show that manufacturing employment reached a cyclical peak in
1998, trending downward thereafter. Consecutive monthly declines in
manufacturing employment began in 2000. Moreover, manufacturing employment
has been trending downward over a much longer period.

Despite the facts, Kerry and the Democrats continue to lie to the public
-- and the media dutifully repeats their lies.