The spin isn't helping Kerry



 Science > Abortion > The spin isn't helping Kerry

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Gactimus"
Date: 14 Oct 2004 02:16:38 PM
Object: The spin isn't helping Kerry
This morning, I was listening to the radio on the way to work, and thought
about the 'Insta-polls' from the night before, which boldly declared that
Kerry won the debate.
I knew all the reasons not to believe in those works of spin. I was well
aware, for example, that many Democrat websites and groups had planned
ahead of time to swamp the polls for Kerry, and I also knew that there is
absolutely no science to those things; even the network polls admit they
have no detailed demographics and use a much smaller base than anyone
would consider reasonable for even a snapshot. But more than anything
else, they miss the critical question. They ask who won the debate,
assuming that this matters in the election. They do not, I think
intentionally, ask who the voters will support in the Election. Because
they already know that answer, and they want to sell a different story.
But I also thought of another way to explain why the spin is not
important. A couple years ago, my department was expanding, and my company
had me interview a number of applicants. I remember one woman in
particular. She was very attractive, very intelligent, and very
articulate. Of more than thirty interviews I had, I would have to say hers
was the most enjoyable, and she made a very good impression. However, when
it was time to make the decision on the two people to hire, this woman was
not one of the two I chose. Why not? Because for all her appearance,
intelligence, and personality, she was not nearly the best qualified. My
department has no direct contact with the public, so beauty and fashion
have no value for our group. My department does analysis and
investigations, and the team members have to be very familiar with the
relevant laws and codes in force. This woman did well in her interview,
but completely failed to show why she should be hired for the position;
she possessed none of the requisite skills.
That is the same problem for John Kerry. he is clearly intelligent, and
dresses well. He does not, however, have the necessary abilities and
resume to be President of the United States. Somehow, Kerry managed to
forget that while his "Hate Bush" message was sufficient to get people to
give him a look, he still had to convince voters that he could do the job.
For all the months he spent campaigning, for all his time in front of
cameras during the Primaries, during the Democrats' Convention, and the
three Debates, John Kerry never showed any compelling reason to believe he
could make the hard choices, or that he understood the priorities and
mission of the White House. Yes, he managed to look and sound impressive
at times. But that only qualified him to replace Martin Sheen. It never
came close to qualifying him for the Oval Office.
It remains to be seen, how much damage will be done by the Old Media spin
machine, by the frantic efforts of his '527' attack dogs, or the smear
tactics of the lawyers sent to extort a Democrat win in the swing states,
but in the end it won't be enough.
John Kerry has proven to the nation that he is not up to the job, and
President Bush has affirmed that he is competent.
.

User: "Larry Hewitt"

Title: Re: The spin isn't helping Kerry 14 Oct 2004 04:08:40 PM
"Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:1097781398.JgA+uPZlbJFhXA5wEsKBPQ@bubbanews...

This morning, I was listening to the radio on the way to work, and thought
about the 'Insta-polls' from the night before, which boldly declared that
Kerry won the debate.

I knew all the reasons not to believe in those works of spin. I was well
aware, for example, that many Democrat websites and groups had planned
ahead of time to swamp the polls for Kerry, and I also knew that there is
absolutely no science to those things; even the network polls admit they
have no detailed demographics and use a much smaller base than anyone
would consider reasonable for even a snapshot. But more than anything
else, they miss the critical question. They ask who won the debate,
assuming that this matters in the election. They do not, I think
intentionally, ask who the voters will support in the Election. Because
they already know that answer, and they want to sell a different story.

But I also thought of another way to explain why the spin is not
important. A couple years ago, my department was expanding, and my company
had me interview a number of applicants. I remember one woman in
particular. She was very attractive, very intelligent, and very
articulate. Of more than thirty interviews I had, I would have to say hers
was the most enjoyable, and she made a very good impression. However, when
it was time to make the decision on the two people to hire, this woman was
not one of the two I chose. Why not? Because for all her appearance,
intelligence, and personality, she was not nearly the best qualified. My
department has no direct contact with the public, so beauty and fashion
have no value for our group. My department does analysis and
investigations, and the team members have to be very familiar with the
relevant laws and codes in force. This woman did well in her interview,
but completely failed to show why she should be hired for the position;
she possessed none of the requisite skills.

That is the same problem for John Kerry. he is clearly intelligent, and
dresses well. He does not, however, have the necessary abilities and
resume to be President of the United States. Somehow, Kerry managed to
forget that while his "Hate Bush" message was sufficient to get people to
give him a look, he still had to convince voters that he could do the job.
For all the months he spent campaigning, for all his time in front of
cameras during the Primaries, during the Democrats' Convention, and the
three Debates, John Kerry never showed any compelling reason to believe he
could make the hard choices, or that he understood the priorities and
mission of the White House. Yes, he managed to look and sound impressive
at times. But that only qualified him to replace Martin Sheen. It never
came close to qualifying him for the Oval Office.

It remains to be seen, how much damage will be done by the Old Media spin
machine, by the frantic efforts of his '527' attack dogs, or the smear
tactics of the lawyers sent to extort a Democrat win in the swing states,
but in the end it won't be enough.

John Kerry has proven to the nation that he is not up to the job, and
President Bush has affirmed that he is competent.

I love the smell of desperation in the morning!
Larry
.
User: "Server 13"

Title: Re: The spin isn't helping Kerry 14 Oct 2004 04:07:28 PM
Larry Hewitt wrote:

"Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:1097781398.JgA+uPZlbJFhXA5wEsKBPQ@bubbanews...

This morning, I was listening to the radio on the way to work, and thought
about the 'Insta-polls' from the night before, which boldly declared that
Kerry won the debate.

I knew all the reasons not to believe in those works of spin. I was well
aware, for example, that many Democrat websites and groups had planned
ahead of time to swamp the polls for Kerry, and I also knew that there is
absolutely no science to those things; even the network polls admit they
have no detailed demographics and use a much smaller base than anyone
would consider reasonable for even a snapshot. But more than anything
else, they miss the critical question. They ask who won the debate,
assuming that this matters in the election. They do not, I think
intentionally, ask who the voters will support in the Election. Because
they already know that answer, and they want to sell a different story.

But I also thought of another way to explain why the spin is not
important. A couple years ago, my department was expanding, and my company
had me interview a number of applicants. I remember one woman in
particular. She was very attractive, very intelligent, and very
articulate. Of more than thirty interviews I had, I would have to say hers
was the most enjoyable, and she made a very good impression. However, when
it was time to make the decision on the two people to hire, this woman was
not one of the two I chose. Why not? Because for all her appearance,
intelligence, and personality, she was not nearly the best qualified. My
department has no direct contact with the public, so beauty and fashion
have no value for our group. My department does analysis and
investigations, and the team members have to be very familiar with the
relevant laws and codes in force. This woman did well in her interview,
but completely failed to show why she should be hired for the position;
she possessed none of the requisite skills.

That is the same problem for John Kerry. he is clearly intelligent, and
dresses well. He does not, however, have the necessary abilities and
resume to be President of the United States. Somehow, Kerry managed to
forget that while his "Hate Bush" message was sufficient to get people to
give him a look, he still had to convince voters that he could do the job.
For all the months he spent campaigning, for all his time in front of
cameras during the Primaries, during the Democrats' Convention, and the
three Debates, John Kerry never showed any compelling reason to believe he
could make the hard choices, or that he understood the priorities and
mission of the White House. Yes, he managed to look and sound impressive
at times. But that only qualified him to replace Martin Sheen. It never
came close to qualifying him for the Oval Office.

It remains to be seen, how much damage will be done by the Old Media spin
machine, by the frantic efforts of his '527' attack dogs, or the smear
tactics of the lawyers sent to extort a Democrat win in the swing states,
but in the end it won't be enough.

John Kerry has proven to the nation that he is not up to the job, and
President Bush has affirmed that he is competent.



I love the smell of desperation in the morning!

Larry


Smells like... victory!!
.
User: "Gactimus"

Title: Re: The spin isn't helping Kerry 14 Oct 2004 04:06:13 PM
Server 13 <c-bee1@uiuc.edu> wrote in news:ckmq52$m0o$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu:

Larry Hewitt wrote:

"Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:1097781398.JgA+uPZlbJFhXA5wEsKBPQ@bubbanews...

This morning, I was listening to the radio on the way to work, and
thought about the 'Insta-polls' from the night before, which boldly
declared that Kerry won the debate.

I knew all the reasons not to believe in those works of spin. I was
well aware, for example, that many Democrat websites and groups had
planned ahead of time to swamp the polls for Kerry, and I also knew
that there is absolutely no science to those things; even the network
polls admit they have no detailed demographics and use a much smaller
base than anyone would consider reasonable for even a snapshot. But
more than anything else, they miss the critical question. They ask who
won the debate, assuming that this matters in the election. They do
not, I think intentionally, ask who the voters will support in the
Election. Because they already know that answer, and they want to sell
a different story.

But I also thought of another way to explain why the spin is not
important. A couple years ago, my department was expanding, and my
company had me interview a number of applicants. I remember one woman
in particular. She was very attractive, very intelligent, and very
articulate. Of more than thirty interviews I had, I would have to say
hers was the most enjoyable, and she made a very good impression.
However, when it was time to make the decision on the two people to
hire, this woman was not one of the two I chose. Why not? Because for
all her appearance, intelligence, and personality, she was not nearly
the best qualified. My department has no direct contact with the
public, so beauty and fashion have no value for our group. My
department does analysis and investigations, and the team members have
to be very familiar with the relevant laws and codes in force. This
woman did well in her interview, but completely failed to show why she
should be hired for the position; she possessed none of the requisite
skills.

That is the same problem for John Kerry. he is clearly intelligent, and
dresses well. He does not, however, have the necessary abilities and
resume to be President of the United States. Somehow, Kerry managed to
forget that while his "Hate Bush" message was sufficient to get people
to give him a look, he still had to convince voters that he could do
the job. For all the months he spent campaigning, for all his time in
front of cameras during the Primaries, during the Democrats'
Convention, and the three Debates, John Kerry never showed any
compelling reason to believe he could make the hard choices, or that he
understood the priorities and mission of the White House. Yes, he
managed to look and sound impressive at times. But that only qualified
him to replace Martin Sheen. It never came close to qualifying him for
the Oval Office.

It remains to be seen, how much damage will be done by the Old Media
spin machine, by the frantic efforts of his '527' attack dogs, or the
smear tactics of the lawyers sent to extort a Democrat win in the swing
states, but in the end it won't be enough.

John Kerry has proven to the nation that he is not up to the job, and
President Bush has affirmed that he is competent.


I love the smell of desperation in the morning!


Smells like... victory!!

For Bush.
.



User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: The spin isn't helping Kerry 15 Oct 2004 12:34:44 AM
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

This morning, I was listening to the radio on the way to work, and thought
about the 'Insta-polls' from the night before, which boldly declared that
Kerry won the debate.

he did.
Keep spinning, gack.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "00doc"

Title: Re: The spin isn't helping Kerry 16 Oct 2004 12:30:53 PM
Ray Fischer wrote:

Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

This morning, I was listening to the radio on the way to
work, and
thought about the 'Insta-polls' from the night before,
which boldly
declared that Kerry won the debate.


he did.

Yeah - he won even in polls that had more Republicans than
Dems responding!
.


User: "Server 13"

Title: Re: The spin isn't helping Kerry 14 Oct 2004 02:25:33 PM
Gactimus wrote:

This morning, I was listening to the radio on the way to work, and thought
about the 'Insta-polls' from the night before, which boldly declared that
Kerry won the debate.

I knew all the reasons not to believe in those works of spin. I was well
aware, for example, that many Democrat websites and groups had planned
ahead of time to swamp the polls for Kerry, and I also knew that there is
absolutely no science to those things; even the network polls admit they
have no detailed demographics and use a much smaller base than anyone
would consider reasonable for even a snapshot. But more than anything
else, they miss the critical question. They ask who won the debate,
assuming that this matters in the election. They do not, I think
intentionally, ask who the voters will support in the Election. Because
they already know that answer, and they want to sell a different story.

But I also thought of another way to explain why the spin is not
important. A couple years ago, my department was expanding, and my company
had me interview a number of applicants. I remember one woman in
particular. She was very attractive, very intelligent, and very
articulate. Of more than thirty interviews I had, I would have to say hers
was the most enjoyable, and she made a very good impression. However, when
it was time to make the decision on the two people to hire, this woman was
not one of the two I chose. Why not? Because for all her appearance,
intelligence, and personality, she was not nearly the best qualified. My
department has no direct contact with the public, so beauty and fashion
have no value for our group. My department does analysis and
investigations, and the team members have to be very familiar with the
relevant laws and codes in force. This woman did well in her interview,
but completely failed to show why she should be hired for the position;
she possessed none of the requisite skills.

That is the same problem for John Kerry. he is clearly intelligent, and
dresses well. He does not, however, have the necessary abilities and
resume to be President of the United States. Somehow, Kerry managed to
forget that while his "Hate Bush" message was sufficient to get people to
give him a look, he still had to convince voters that he could do the job.
For all the months he spent campaigning, for all his time in front of
cameras during the Primaries, during the Democrats' Convention, and the
three Debates, John Kerry never showed any compelling reason to believe he
could make the hard choices, or that he understood the priorities and
mission of the White House. Yes, he managed to look and sound impressive
at times. But that only qualified him to replace Martin Sheen. It never
came close to qualifying him for the Oval Office.

It remains to be seen, how much damage will be done by the Old Media spin
machine, by the frantic efforts of his '527' attack dogs, or the smear
tactics of the lawyers sent to extort a Democrat win in the swing states,
but in the end it won't be enough.

John Kerry has proven to the nation that he is not up to the job, and
President Bush has affirmed that he is competent.

quack quack quack
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER