| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Osprey" |
| Date: |
27 Apr 2005 08:47:45 PM |
| Object: |
To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
Probably most of you don't care and haven't read it. From my understanding,
most post by Adam H. are ignored by most in here; however, I feel it
necessary to set the record straight. Adam H., for what ever odd reason he
has, has decided to spread a lie in here. On 4/27/2005, Adam H. came in
this newsgroup claiming I reported his post as spam to his ISP. This of
course is not true.
Why Adam H. has decided to start this, I don't know. It could be due to
frustration, lack of medication, or being out of work. I frankly don't know
and don't care. What I do care about is when pieces of slime like Adam go
around spreading false rumors and lies that may include me.
So for the record, if you happen to see a post in which Adam claims I
reported any of his post I am setting the record straight. I have never
sent any of his post in as being reported for spam.
The only time I report someone for spam is when I get junk mail in my
personal email's, and that is automatic. I have a setting in my email
program that detects what is believed to be spam and it deletes it.
But as far as any post in here goes, and Adam's claims...it's straight up,
Grade A, *****. Yes, Adam H., you are a liar.
.
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
27 Apr 2005 09:53:02 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:47:45 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Probably most of you don't care and haven't read it. From my understanding,
most post by Adam H. are ignored by most in here; however, I feel it
necessary to set the record straight. Adam H., for what ever odd reason he
has, has decided to spread a lie in here. On 4/27/2005, Adam H. came in
this newsgroup claiming I reported his post as spam to his ISP. This of
course is not true.
Now, for that to be a lie on my part, you'd first better be able to
demonstrate that I know that it's not true that you reported my post
as spam.
Since such a tactic is well within your immature and cowardly tactics,
I consider it very likely that you did report that post as spam in
your never-ending quest to get to the bottom of the gutter.
Your apology for accusing me of a lie I never told is accepted, Mary
Anne.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
27 Apr 2005 10:08:29 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114656755.ccb923b9fce6fb4c6bf82f5821c28c44@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:47:45 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Probably most of you don't care and haven't read it. From my
understanding,
most post by Adam H. are ignored by most in here; however, I feel it
necessary to set the record straight. Adam H., for what ever odd reason
he
has, has decided to spread a lie in here. On 4/27/2005, Adam H. came in
this newsgroup claiming I reported his post as spam to his ISP. This of
course is not true.
Now, for that to be a lie on my part, you'd first better be able to
demonstrate that I know that it's not true that you reported my post
as spam.
Take note: Adam H. Diversion 101 - shift burden, or in his own words, "move
the goal post"
Sorry Adam H.,
Truth is, I never reported you. I have absolutely no idea what you were
even talking about.
And if you were indeed reported and just come out and say it was me, without
knowing, that makes you a very careless and irresponsible person.
Since such a tactic is well within your immature and cowardly tactics,
I consider it very likely that you did report that post as spam in
your never-ending quest to get to the bottom of the gutter.
Oh, now it changes...
First it was, "Osprey did report me"...now it is "I consider it very likely"
I would expect that an honest person would have the decency to apologize for
their recklessness and error, but you are not an honest person so an apology
would never be expected.
Fact: Adam H. lied by saying I reported him
Fact: Adam H. has shown he doesn't even know who reported him, if anyone
reported him at all
Fact: Adam H. is a liar
Those are facts Adam H., that can be proven. This post serves it's purpose
What was that other saying you like to say???
ummm.....
wait..it's coming to me...
oh yea....
F.O.A.D. LIAR
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
27 Apr 2005 10:13:48 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:08:29 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114656755.ccb923b9fce6fb4c6bf82f5821c28c44@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:47:45 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Probably most of you don't care and haven't read it. From my
understanding,
most post by Adam H. are ignored by most in here; however, I feel it
necessary to set the record straight. Adam H., for what ever odd reason
he
has, has decided to spread a lie in here. On 4/27/2005, Adam H. came in
this newsgroup claiming I reported his post as spam to his ISP. This of
course is not true.
Now, for that to be a lie on my part, you'd first better be able to
demonstrate that I know that it's not true that you reported my post
as spam.
Take note: Adam H. Diversion 101 - shift burden, or in his own words, "move
the goal post"
Sorry Adam H.,
Truth is, I never reported you. I have absolutely no idea what you were
even talking about.
And if you were indeed reported and just come out and say it was me, without
knowing, that makes you a very careless and irresponsible person.
You mean, like you claiming that Barnes is a convicted felon, or that
I'm unemployed, or that PLH was fired for reasons involving
impropriety, or whatever slander you feel like lying about this week?
That sort of thing, Mary Anne?
Since such a tactic is well within your immature and cowardly tactics,
I consider it very likely that you did report that post as spam in
your never-ending quest to get to the bottom of the gutter.
Oh, now it changes...
First it was, "Osprey did report me"...now it is "I consider it very likely"
And? Am I to believe that a post from me in reply to you was reported
by someone else, rather than the chickenshit claven who read it?
I would expect that an honest person would have the decency to apologize for
their recklessness and error, but you are not an honest person so an apology
would never be expected.
So. We see now that you have just ADMITTED that you are not an honest
person.
Oh, it just keeps on getting better, Mary Anne. Thanks for playing -
now we can certainly be justified in saying that you are definitely
not honest, and you have admitted it.
Nothing further is required from you, and you've certainly given up
any hope of being seen as honest, so you should probably just give up
entirely now. Admitting that you're dishonest is probably (ironically)
the first honest post you've made.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
27 Apr 2005 10:20:35 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114657985.1e294c6354a2d880c15b2a9e45ec303e@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:08:29 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114656755.ccb923b9fce6fb4c6bf82f5821c28c44@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:47:45 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Probably most of you don't care and haven't read it. From my
understanding,
most post by Adam H. are ignored by most in here; however, I feel it
necessary to set the record straight. Adam H., for what ever odd reason
he
has, has decided to spread a lie in here. On 4/27/2005, Adam H. came in
this newsgroup claiming I reported his post as spam to his ISP. This of
course is not true.
Now, for that to be a lie on my part, you'd first better be able to
demonstrate that I know that it's not true that you reported my post
as spam.
Take note: Adam H. Diversion 101 - shift burden, or in his own words,
"move
the goal post"
Sorry Adam H.,
Truth is, I never reported you. I have absolutely no idea what you were
even talking about.
And if you were indeed reported and just come out and say it was me,
without
knowing, that makes you a very careless and irresponsible person.
You mean, like you claiming that Barnes is a convicted felon,
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
or that
I'm unemployed,
That too was already proven by your lack of proving I was wrong.
I love how you try to shift things when you get caught up.
Why can't you just come out, be a man, and own up for your error and
apologize? Why do you have to drag things out? Are you that scared? Are you
that insecure?????
or that PLH was fired for reasons involving
impropriety,
That too was already proven.
Since such a tactic is well within your immature and cowardly tactics,
I consider it very likely that you did report that post as spam in
your never-ending quest to get to the bottom of the gutter.
Oh, now it changes...
First it was, "Osprey did report me"...now it is "I consider it very
likely"
And? Am I to believe that a post from me in reply to you was reported
by someone else, rather than the chickenshit claven who read it?
I never reported you for anything, so why can't you just come out, apologize
for your error, and deal with the consequences of your actions?
I would expect that an honest person would have the decency to apologize
for
their recklessness and error, but you are not an honest person so an
apology
would never be expected.
So. We see now that you have just ADMITTED that you are not an honest
person.
Oh brother, no wonder so many consider you a child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
27 Apr 2005 10:22:42 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114657985.1e294c6354a2d880c15b2a9e45ec303e@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:08:29 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114656755.ccb923b9fce6fb4c6bf82f5821c28c44@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:47:45 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Probably most of you don't care and haven't read it. From my
understanding,
most post by Adam H. are ignored by most in here; however, I feel it
necessary to set the record straight. Adam H., for what ever odd reason
he
has, has decided to spread a lie in here. On 4/27/2005, Adam H. came in
this newsgroup claiming I reported his post as spam to his ISP. This of
course is not true.
Now, for that to be a lie on my part, you'd first better be able to
demonstrate that I know that it's not true that you reported my post
as spam.
Take note: Adam H. Diversion 101 - shift burden, or in his own words,
"move
the goal post"
Sorry Adam H.,
Truth is, I never reported you. I have absolutely no idea what you were
even talking about.
And if you were indeed reported and just come out and say it was me,
without
knowing, that makes you a very careless and irresponsible person.
You mean, like you claiming that Barnes is a convicted felon,
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he hasn't
either.
or that
I'm unemployed,
That too was already proven by your lack of proving I was wrong.
Then everything ever said about you, that you have failed to prove
wrong, is now proven right.
Exactly how many things *is that, Mary Anne?
Of course, seeing as you have now admitted that you are dishonest, we
couldn't even accept any proof you offer.
Enough from you, Mary Anne. You were fun but geez, it's just not a
challenge anymore. Just remember your admittance that you're dishonest
and that everything said about you is right until you prove it's
wrong, because that's how it is from here on.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
27 Apr 2005 10:55:25 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114657985.1e294c6354a2d880c15b2a9e45ec303e@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:08:29 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114656755.ccb923b9fce6fb4c6bf82f5821c28c44@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:47:45 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Probably most of you don't care and haven't read it. From my
understanding,
most post by Adam H. are ignored by most in here; however, I feel it
necessary to set the record straight. Adam H., for what ever odd
reason
he
has, has decided to spread a lie in here. On 4/27/2005, Adam H. came
in
this newsgroup claiming I reported his post as spam to his ISP. This
of
course is not true.
Now, for that to be a lie on my part, you'd first better be able to
demonstrate that I know that it's not true that you reported my post
as spam.
Take note: Adam H. Diversion 101 - shift burden, or in his own words,
"move
the goal post"
Sorry Adam H.,
Truth is, I never reported you. I have absolutely no idea what you were
even talking about.
And if you were indeed reported and just come out and say it was me,
without
knowing, that makes you a very careless and irresponsible person.
You mean, like you claiming that Barnes is a convicted felon,
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the archives because
I posted it several times, the actual court documents that says David Barnes
was charged.
or that
I'm unemployed,
That too was already proven by your lack of proving I was wrong.
Then everything ever said about you, that you have failed to prove
wrong, is now proven right.
To each his own
So, I take it you are going to stick to your lie about this reporting
incident?
Are you going to show some proof?
Of course your not, because you prefer to lie.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 01:02:58 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the archives because
I posted it several times, the actual court documents that says David Barnes
was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes was charged -
the problem being that the one that posts in this newsgroup isn't that
person. That's what you're too stupid and/or dishonest to understand.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 08:40:45 AM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7gv30bx.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the archives
because
I posted it several times, the actual court documents that says David
Barnes
was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes was
charged -
the problem being that the one that posts in this newsgroup isn't that
person. That's what you're too stupid and/or dishonest to understand.
Notice how, in a single exchange, Assprey's words went from "charged and
found guilty" to just "charged." This doesn't even account for the simple
dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he claims, it is *the David
Barnes that posts to this NG.
Assprey is such an asswipe.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 10:30:50 AM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@fuckyoumaverick.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7gv30bx.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the archives
because I posted it several times, the actual court documents that says
David Barnes was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes was
charged - the problem being that the one that posts in this newsgroup isn't
that person. That's what you're too stupid and/or dishonest to understand.
Notice how, in a single exchange, Assprey's words went from "charged and
found guilty" to just "charged." This doesn't even account for the simple
dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he claims, it is *the David
Barnes that posts to this NG.
Assprey is such an asswipe.
That's being a bit on the charitable side...from here, it looks like he's got
a few googleplexes of rungs up the ladder to climb to attain even that
status.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 12:10:08 PM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@fuckyoumaverick.com> wrote in message
news:xJ5ce.30242$AE6.29342@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7gv30bx.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the archives
because
I posted it several times, the actual court documents that says David
Barnes
was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes was
charged -
the problem being that the one that posts in this newsgroup isn't that
person. That's what you're too stupid and/or dishonest to understand.
Notice how, in a single exchange, Assprey's words went from "charged and
found guilty" to just "charged." This doesn't even account for the simple
dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he claims, it is *the David
Barnes that posts to this NG.
Assprey is such an asswipe.
This is where you guys are stupid and I was able to yank your chains.
I knew by posting those in the manner in which I did, you guys would bite.
NOT ONCE did I EVER claim that the Patrick L. Humphrey or the David Barnes
that posts in this news groups was the same Patrick L. Humphrey or David
Barnes
in those court documents.
I only said, Patrick L. Humphrey and/or David Barnes was charged with (what
ever the documents said).
There was no lie, I provided the evidence.
You guys jumped, which I figured you would. And since there was no way out
for you guys, you went on
a rampage, which I figured you would.
You can't say I lied, I didn't. I provided the evidence to support the
claims.
Also, remember, David Barnes went on a rampage saying he was going to have
me fired, going to take me to court..yadda yadda yadda.
Knowing he was against the wall and he couldn't do anything he suddenly
changed his position and said his real name isn't David Barnes.
Isn't that funny? For someone who was going to take me to court...suddenly
claims that that isn't his real name???
You guys were too easy, WAY too easy. I only wished you could have provided
me some sort of a challenge.
The asswhipes...are you, Patrick, David, Adam, Krisblake, and especially
Ricky...for jumping like you did.
Also note, not ONCE..EVER...was any of those claims EVER posted from any
state computer.
Not ONCE..EVER..was any claim made in which I used a professional position.
So all your rants, all your cries...are nothing more than that...cries and
rants.
You guys jumped, you bit, I pulled, and caught me a few suckers..:o)
Have a nice day!!!
You might want to tell someone Donald, on your next call as an EMT
<snicker>, you are a sucker.
The person you may be trying to save may not want a sucker.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 05:57:30 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <> writes:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@fuckyoumaverick.com> wrote in message
news:xJ5ce.30242$AE6.29342@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7gv30bx.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Osprey" < > writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey" < >
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the archives
because I posted it several times, the actual court documents that says
David Barnes was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes was
charged - the problem being that the one that posts in this newsgroup
isn't that person. That's what you're too stupid and/or dishonest to
understand.
Notice how, in a single exchange, Assprey's words went from "charged and
found guilty" to just "charged." This doesn't even account for the simple
dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he claims, it is *the David
Barnes that posts to this NG.
Assprey is such an asswipe.
This is where you guys are stupid and I was able to yank your chains.
I knew by posting those in the manner in which I did, you guys would bite.
You also knew that you were posting it just so you could get some attention in
an effort to be superior to anything.
NOT ONCE did I EVER claim that the Patrick L. Humphrey or the David Barnes
that posts in this news groups was the same Patrick L. Humphrey or David
Barnes in those court documents.
I guess it's just an amazing coincidence that you only posted it in newsgroups
David and I participate in, right?
I only said, Patrick L. Humphrey and/or David Barnes was charged with (what
ever the documents said). There was no lie, I provided the evidence.
Reasonable people would wonder what your motivation is for doing that.
You guys jumped, which I figured you would. And since there was no way out
for you guys, you went on a rampage, which I figured you would.
You can't say I lied, I didn't. I provided the evidence to support the
claims.
You're a sleazy *****, Bobby. You made it anything but a secret that you
wanted others to believe your fairy tales.
Also, remember, David Barnes went on a rampage saying he was going to have
me fired, going to take me to court..yadda yadda yadda.
Knowing he was against the wall and he couldn't do anything he suddenly
changed his position and said his real name isn't David Barnes.
If that's never been his real name, he obviously hasn't changed his position,
and you obviously haven't changed your idiocy.
Isn't that funny? For someone who was going to take me to court...suddenly
claims that that isn't his real name???
Clueless, you are...I knoew that wasn't his real name long before you got the
idea.
You guys were too easy, WAY too easy. I only wished you could have provided
me some sort of a challenge.
You're just whining because you can't make anyone in this newsgroup obey you,
so you have to take out your frustrations on your inmates.
The asswhipes...are you, Patrick, David, Adam, Krisblake, and especially
Ricky...for jumping like you did.
Also note, not ONCE..EVER...was any of those claims EVER posted from any
state computer.
Really?
Explain this:
-----start-----
Path: internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: (osprey)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion
Subject: Re: restating my abortion position
Date: 22 Dec 2003 22:32:24 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <8912d58d.0312222232.45bb1acd@posting.google.com>
References: <5tsFb.4479$IM3.1400@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net> <0jGFb.9333$wL6.5326@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> <szk3cbc1m5f.fsf@fnord.io.com> <Xns9459B9B41FFEEkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166> <szk4qvsz7pf.fsf@fnord.io.com> <tyMFb.9810$wL6.2715@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> <FLidncve4qtXC3qi4p2dnA@comcast.com> <%MMFb.9817$wL6.1941@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> <zcSdnQbZNtgRBHqiRVn-sQ@comcast.com> <479fuv08q9qpi1d90k80u6286ta8rnd400@4ax.com> <szkr7yw89qa.fsf@fnord.io.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 167.21.1.226
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1072161144 8137 127.0.0.1 (23 Dec 2003 06:32:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 06:32:24 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com talk.abortion:768636 alt.abortion:565814
Patrick Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkr7yw89qa.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> writes:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:23:33 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"John Wentzky" <cio@buyatbid.com> wrote in message
news:%MMFb.9817$wL6.1941@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:FLidncve4qtXC3qi4p2dnA@comcast.com...
[...]
Did you know that Patrick L. Humphrey was
a)charged with one count of possessing cocaine base with intent to
distribute
b)count of using and carrying a firearm in a drug trafficking crime
Is he black?
Only a question.
No
Was Patrick LAMAR Humphrey a fellow inmate of yours?
I don't know -- was the Cop Reject ever incarcerated in Alabama? ;_)
He has some disease that is killing him.
Are you responsible for giving it to Mr. P. LAMAR Humphrey, too?
Ugh. I'm a little too heterosexual to think about that.
FACT:
Patrick L. Humphrey was
a)charged with one count of possessing cocaine base with intent to
distribute
b)count of using and carrying a firearm in a drug trafficking crime
Source provided allready.
That is one thing that I can say you have not been able to do, provide
one source for your claims.
Not ONCE..EVER..was any claim made in which I used a professional position.
So all your rants, all your cries...are nothing more than that...cries and
rants.
You guys jumped, you bit, I pulled, and caught me a few suckers..:o)
Have a nice day!!!
You might want to tell someone Donald, on your next call as an EMT
<snicker>, you are a sucker.
The person you may be trying to save may not want a sucker.
------end------
Never posted your crap from a state of Delaware IP, did you? Do a traceroute
to the IP in your quoted post from December 22, 2003 -- I think you'll find
it's a state IP. Anything with the first two bytes of 167.21 is being paid
for by your state's taxpayers.
Thanks for being so easy to gun down this time, Bobby.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 07:40:31 PM |
|
|
Patrick Lee Humphrey wrote:
"Osprey" < > writes:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@fuckyoumaverick.com> wrote in
message
news:xJ5ce.30242$AE6.29342@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7gv30bx.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Osprey" < > writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey"
<>
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David
Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says
he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the
archives
because I posted it several times, the actual court documents
that says
David Barnes was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes
was
charged - the problem being that the one that posts in this
newsgroup
isn't that person. That's what you're too stupid and/or
dishonest to
understand.
Notice how, in a single exchange, Assprey's words went from
"charged and
found guilty" to just "charged." This doesn't even account for the
simple
dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he claims, it is *the
David
Barnes that posts to this NG.
Assprey is such an asswipe.
This is where you guys are stupid and I was able to yank your
chains.
I knew by posting those in the manner in which I did, you guys would
bite.
You also knew that you were posting it just so you could get some
attention in
an effort to be superior to anything.
No, I knew what I was posting and for what the intention was for. To
get you guys to
jump, and boy did you ever.
NOT ONCE did I EVER claim that the Patrick L. Humphrey or the David
Barnes
that posts in this news groups was the same Patrick L. Humphrey or
David
Barnes in those court documents.
I guess it's just an amazing coincidence that you only posted it in
newsgroups
David and I participate in, right?
Hey, that is just how it goes.
By the way, he said his real name is David..oh wait..that was when he
was on his rampage about having the courts take action against me and
when enough time went by and his lie couldn't work any longer, he said
his real name isn't David.
I only said, Patrick L. Humphrey and/or David Barnes was charged
with (what
ever the documents said). There was no lie, I provided the
evidence.
Reasonable people would wonder what your motivation is for doing
that.
Well, you are not reasonable so I had to spell it out for you.
To get you to BITE!!!
And you were probably one of the biggest suckers I landed, you and
Barnes are trophy suckers...mounted up on the wall. With "Jackass 1"
and "Jackass 2" engraved on each plaque..:o)
You guys jumped, which I figured you would. And since there was no
way out
for you guys, you went on a rampage, which I figured you would.
You can't say I lied, I didn't. I provided the evidence to support
the
claims.
You're a sleazy *****, Bobby.
Oh no patty, that would be you. I just played your games. You like to
lie about me and make things up...well, I just found a very creative
way to get to you guys and make you bite..:o)
You made it anything but a secret that you
wanted others to believe your fairy tales.
Also, remember, David Barnes went on a rampage saying he was going
to have
me fired, going to take me to court..yadda yadda yadda.
Knowing he was against the wall and he couldn't do anything he
suddenly
changed his position and said his real name isn't David Barnes.
If that's never been his real name, he obviously hasn't changed his
position,
and you obviously haven't changed your idiocy.
And you haven't changed your stupidity..:o)
Isn't that funny? For someone who was going to take me to
court...suddenly
claims that that isn't his real name???
Clueless, you are...I knoew that wasn't his real name long before you
got the
idea.
Oh yea, sure you did..ROFL
You guys were too easy, WAY too easy. I only wished you could have
provided
me some sort of a challenge.
You're just whining because you can't make anyone in this newsgroup
obey you,
Patty, I am outnumbered in here..something like 30 of you idiots to
maybe 2 or 3 people like myself who don't agree with your issues. I
knew coming in here I wasn't going to get support..I don't look for
support. You don't get that.
so you have to take out your frustrations on your inmates.
Oh my...you going to take that route now? LOL
The asswhipes...are you, Patrick, David, Adam, Krisblake, and
especially
Ricky...for jumping like you did.
Also note, not ONCE..EVER...was any of those claims EVER posted from
any
state computer.
Really?
Explain this:
-----start-----
Path:
internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: (osprey)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion
Subject: Re: restating my abortion position
Date: 22 Dec 2003 22:32:24 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <8912d58d.0312222232.45bb1acd@posting.google.com>
References: <5tsFb.4479$IM3.1400@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>
<0jGFb.9333$wL6.5326@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
<szk3cbc1m5f.fsf@fnord.io.com>
<Xns9459B9B41FFEEkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>
<szk4qvsz7pf.fsf@fnord.io.com>
<tyMFb.9810$wL6.2715@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
<FLidncve4qtXC3qi4p2dnA@comcast.com>
<%MMFb.9817$wL6.1941@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
<zcSdnQbZNtgRBHqiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>
<479fuv08q9qpi1d90k80u6286ta8rnd400@4ax.com>
<szkr7yw89qa.fsf@fnord.io.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 167.21.1.226
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1072161144 8137 127.0.0.1 (23 Dec 2003
06:32:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 06:32:24 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com talk.abortion:768636
alt.abortion:565814
Patrick Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:<szkr7yw89qa.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> writes:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:23:33 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"John Wentzky" <cio@buyatbid.com> wrote in message
news:%MMFb.9817$wL6.1941@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:FLidncve4qtXC3qi4p2dnA@comcast.com...
[...]
Did you know that Patrick L. Humphrey was
a)charged with one count of possessing cocaine base with
intent to
distribute
b)count of using and carrying a firearm in a drug trafficking
crime
Is he black?
Only a question.
No
Was Patrick LAMAR Humphrey a fellow inmate of yours?
I don't know -- was the Cop Reject ever incarcerated in Alabama?
;_)
He has some disease that is killing him.
Are you responsible for giving it to Mr. P. LAMAR Humphrey, too?
Ugh. I'm a little too heterosexual to think about that.
FACT:
Patrick L. Humphrey was
a)charged with one count of possessing cocaine base with intent to
distribute
b)count of using and carrying a firearm in a drug trafficking crime
Source provided allready.
That is one thing that I can say you have not been able to do,
provide
one source for your claims.
Not ONCE..EVER..was any claim made in which I used a professional
position.
So all your rants, all your cries...are nothing more than
that...cries and
rants.
You guys jumped, you bit, I pulled, and caught me a few suckers..:o)
Have a nice day!!!
You might want to tell someone Donald, on your next call as an EMT
<snicker>, you are a sucker.
The person you may be trying to save may not want a sucker.
------end------
Never posted your crap from a state of Delaware IP, did you? Do a
traceroute
to the IP in your quoted post from December 22, 2003 -- I think
you'll find
it's a state IP. Anything with the first two bytes of 167.21 is
being paid
for by your state's taxpayers.
Thanks for being so easy to gun down this time, Bobby.
Where is the false claim???
There was nothing about you in that, just about Patrick L.
Humphrey..:o)
So guess what, you and Ricky are pissing in the wind..:o)
As usual.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 10:22:10 PM |
|
|
The other Donald wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7gv30bx.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David
Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he
hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the
archives
because
I posted it several times, the actual court documents that says
David
Barnes
was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes
was
charged -
the problem being that the one that posts in this newsgroup isn't
that
person. That's what you're too stupid and/or dishonest to
understand.
Notice how, in a single exchange, Assprey's words went from "charged
and
found guilty" to just "charged." This doesn't even account for the
simple
dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he claims, it is *the
David
Barnes that posts to this NG.
Take note of one other thing in Donald's reply.
He says...
"This doesn't even account for the simple dilemma that, even if the
documents exist as he claims, it is *the David Barnes that posts to
this NG."
The documents exist, I have shown them. They are actual court
documents.
Donald is making the claim that the David Barnes that post in this
newsgroup is the SAME David Barnes on the documents.
Remember something, I never said that the David Barnes on the documents
was the same David Barnes that posts in this NG. Donald said it!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 10:36:36 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
The other Donald wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7gv30bx.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the archives
because I posted it several times, the actual court documents that says
David Barnes was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes was
charged - the problem being that the one that posts in this newsgroup
isn't that person. That's what you're too stupid and/or dishonest to
understand.
Notice how, in a single exchange, Assprey's words went from "charged and
found guilty" to just "charged." This doesn't even account for the simple
dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he claims, it is *the David
Barnes that posts to this NG.
Take note of one other thing in Donald's reply. He says... "This doesn't
even account for the simple dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he
claims, it is *the David Barnes that posts to this NG."
The documents exist, I have shown them. They are actual court documents.
....that don't happen to have anything to do with the person you're obsessed
with in this newsgroup.
Donald is making the claim that the David Barnes that post in this newsgroup
is the SAME David Barnes on the documents. Remember something, I never said
that the David Barnes on the documents was the same David Barnes that posts
in this NG. Donald said it!!!
....and he'll admit his mistake, unlike a certain crossdressing prison guard in
Delaware. You're the immature little ***** who refuses to prove your own
assertions. QED.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
28 Apr 2005 10:48:49 PM |
|
|
Patrick Lee Humphrey wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
The other Donald wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7gv30bx.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:1114658518.5cdd20502c600e9d05a73b219ba3eeaf@teranews...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:20:35 -0400, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
I have already provided the documented evidence that David
Barnes was
charged and found guilty.
No, you haven't. I certainly haven't seen it and Barnes says
he hasn't
either.
Well I guess you are just going to have to go back into the
archives
because I posted it several times, the actual court documents
that says
David Barnes was charged.
You mean the documents that show that someone named David Barnes
was
charged - the problem being that the one that posts in this
newsgroup
isn't that person. That's what you're too stupid and/or
dishonest to
understand.
Notice how, in a single exchange, Assprey's words went from
"charged and
found guilty" to just "charged." This doesn't even account for the
simple
dilemma that, even if the documents exist as he claims, it is *the
David
Barnes that posts to this NG.
Take note of one other thing in Donald's reply. He says... "This
doesn't
even account for the simple dilemma that, even if the documents
exist as he
claims, it is *the David Barnes that posts to this NG."
The documents exist, I have shown them. They are actual court
documents.
...that don't happen to have anything to do with the person you're
obsessed
with in this newsgroup.
obsessed? Not hardly, just passing some time. You guys have actually
been a help when I needed a break from doing some research or writing a
paper. Oh by the way, I was asked to write another article for the
Wilmington New Journal. Maybe Ricky will be interested..:o)
I have to work on it next week and have it finished by Wed. It is
about an acronym used by police officers, known as S.A.R.A., and the
importance of education for Correctional Officers and how easy it is to
get education..even online.
Anyway...enough about that.
You guys have really been a big help though, thanks. I am sure you
know as well as I do now, the hours put into researching and writing
papers can be tedious. It helps to have a vice, to break away. You guys
are really good at giving me that.
I just finished up my final paper for my multicultural class. It has
to do with my family ancestory and the impact the criminal justice
system has had on my family. Did you know about the horrible treatment
against German Americans during World War II? Fascinating history, and
it wasn't until 2001 that the U.S. Government acknowledged its role in
many violations of civil rights.
There I go again...getting off on my personal issues. But it is
fascinating anyway.
Donald is making the claim that the David Barnes that post in this
newsgroup
is the SAME David Barnes on the documents. Remember something, I
never said
that the David Barnes on the documents was the same David Barnes
that posts
in this NG. Donald said it!!!
...and he'll admit his mistake, unlike a certain crossdressing prison
guard in
Delaware.
Well your observation skills are not very good then, either that or you
pick and choose what you want to read and believe. I have often times
admitted to my mistakes in here patty. You may want to open your eyes a
bit.
Oh, to be a good Correctional Officer...observation skills are a must.
Yours are not that good...you are not qualified to be a guard.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. |
29 Apr 2005 07:01:00 AM |
|
|
On 28 Apr 2005 20:48:49 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Patrick Lee Humphrey wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
[...]
Donald is making the claim that the David Barnes that post in this
newsgroup
is the SAME David Barnes on the documents. Remember something, I
never said
that the David Barnes on the documents was the same David Barnes
that posts
in this NG. Donald said it!!!
...and he'll admit his mistake, unlike a certain crossdressing prison
guard in
Delaware.
Well your observation skills are not very good then, either that or you
pick and choose what you want to read and believe. I have often times
admitted to my mistakes in here patty.
Is that why you ordered Google to delete YOUR cross-dressing posts?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: To clarify a lie told by Adam H. (***** whines like a little baby) |
27 Apr 2005 10:34:44 PM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Probably most of you don't care and haven't read it.
Most people know you to be a liar and an *****.
From my understanding,
You don't understand where your ***** is, moron.
however, I feel it
necessary to set the record straight.
Then stop lying, *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
