Science > Abortion > Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Sound of Trumpet" |
| Date: |
26 Feb 2007 10:54:10 AM |
| Object: |
Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1790070/posts
Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President
Life News ^ | 2/23/07 | Steven Ertelt
Posted on 02/23/2007 2:17:51 PM PST by wagglebee
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- One of the top pro-abortion groups,
which is also the wealthiest political action committee in the
country, has endorsed pro-abortion New York Sen. Hillary Clinton in
her bid for the Democratic nomination for president.
Emily's List only supports pro-abortion women for political office and
it endorsed Clinton even though all of the other Democratic
presidential candidates back abortion as well.
The Clinton endorsement is the first presidential endorsement the
group has made since past Democratic nominees who backed abortion were
all men.
Emily's List President Ellen Malcolm sees gains made in the 2006
election in putting more pro-abortion women in Congress as setting the
take for a victory for the former first lady. "Women are really moving
up at all levels, which really sets the stage for the big enchilada,
and we're doing all we can to help Hillary Clinton become the first
woman president," Malcolm told the Oakland Tribune. "We have a full
plate for 2008."
The group will provide more than just money -- it raised $46 million
for candidates in 2006 -- to Clinton. The group lends experienced
campaign staff members and provides get out the vote help as well.
That could be important in early primary states like Iowa and New
Hampshire.
Malcolm will be at Clinton's fundraiser Friday at San Francisco's
Sheraton Palace Hotel.
She told the newspaper she's not afraid some of her group's membership
may be enamored with the "rock star" status of pro-abortion Sen.
Barack Obama of Illinois.
"There are certainly some members that are on the fence and haven't
decided, and I would say, 'That's fine, go check out the candidates.'
I think you're going to conclude that Hillary is the strongest
candidate for Democrats to run in the general election," she told the
Tribune.
"If there's one thing Clintons know how to do, it's win. And if
there's one thing we as Democrats need right now, it's victory to take
back the White House," she added.
Interestingly, pro-abortion leaders are split on the presidential
candidates. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina recently received the
backing of Kate Michelman, the longtime president of NARAL, another
top pro-abortion organization.
Though it can help bankroll the Clinton candidacy, it can't assure the
abortion advocate it will help her win.
Emily's List outraised and outspent every other political action
committee on any issue during the 2006 elections, but it didn't mean
success.
Of the 19 competitive House races in which EMILY's List backed and
funded a candidate, only two won. This follows on the heels of the
group's 2004 performance, in which it went three for 13 in head-to-
head contests against the conservative Club for Growth.
In 2006, the only successful EMILY contenders for Republican seats
were state Sen. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Arizona) -- who was heavily
favored all along to win the seat of retiring Rep. Jim Kolbe -- and
New York attorney Kirsten Gillibrand, who won only after the late leak
of a police report alleging that Rep. John Sweeney of New York had
choked his wife.
Combined EMILY's List contributions of $100,000 and independent
expenditures worth $270,000 could not save the high-profile
candidacies of Iraq War vet Tammy Duckworth of Illinois and child-
safety advocate Patty Wetterling.
In New Mexico, Atty. Gen. Patricia Madrid (D) failed in her quest to
oust perennial survivor Rep. Heather Wilson (R), despite $48,000 in
contributions and $110,000 in independent expenditures from the
group.
Other EMILY candidates who had high hopes -- in Arizona, Washington
State, Nevada, California, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania and Nebraska -- all lost, even as male Democrats rode the
wave to victory on November 7.
.
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Sound of Trumpet: a lying *****? |
26 Feb 2007 03:38:53 PM |
|
|
"Sound of Trumpet" <sound_of_trumpet@warpmail.net> wrote in message
news:1172508850.417669.154010@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1790070/posts
Top Pro-Abortion Group
"Pro-abortion group" = no such thing.
You're a liar.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Sound of Trumpet: a lying *****? |
26 Feb 2007 08:18:30 PM |
|
|
In news:45e35372$0$28176$4c368faf@roadrunner.com,
abracadabra <abra@hotmail.com> typed:
"Sound of Trumpet" <sound_of_trumpet@warpmail.net> wrote in message
news:1172508850.417669.154010@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1790070/posts
Top Pro-Abortion Group
"Pro-abortion group" = no such thing.
You are damned, you hellhole piece of *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "hanna" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
26 Feb 2007 04:11:16 PM |
|
|
Anything is better than Bush/Cheney.
H
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dkat" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
27 Feb 2007 12:39:48 PM |
|
|
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion. Many of us who would
never have an abortion are still pro-choice. A woman must have
control of her own body and as long as you are in the first trimester
where Roe vs Wade gave this option, it is pretty clear that the only
argument against it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
27 Feb 2007 12:50:31 PM |
|
|
"dkat" <dkatster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legalized
abortion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
27 Feb 2007 05:51:51 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkatster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legalized
abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
27 Feb 2007 11:50:53 PM |
|
|
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legalized
abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
Your delusion and denial is in the minority.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 12:08:18 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legalized
abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
Your delusion and denial is in the minority.
I've only been pro-choice for almost as long as you've been alive. Do the
rest of us a favor and choke on that inconvenient fact.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 12:12:49 AM |
|
|
On Feb 28, 1:08=C2=A0am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legaliz=
ed
abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. =C2=A0Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=3Dproabortion
Main Entry: pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a=C2=B7bor=C2=B7tion (pr=C5=8D'=C9=99-b=C3=B4r'sh=C9=99n)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion =E2=80=94pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion=C2=
=B7ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Your next whine and/or complain would be???
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 12:29:02 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legalized
abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=proabortion
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a·bor·tion (prō'ə-bôr'shən)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion —pro·abor·tion·ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the antics of an
illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary, anyway?
Your next whine and/or complain would be???
I guess no one wants to tell you what I did to "your" page...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 12:32:03 AM |
|
|
On Feb 28, 1:29=C2=A0am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08=C2=A0am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrot=
e:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported lega=
lized
abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. =C2=A0Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=3Dproabortion
Main Entry: pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a=C2=B7bor=C2=B7tion =C2=A0 (pr=C5=8D'=C9=99-b=C3=B4r'sh=C9=99n)
adj. =C2=A0 Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion =E2=80=94pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion=
=C2=B7ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the antics of an
illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary, anyway?
Oh brother, that's your attempt now to divert from the fact on what
the dictionary says...how old is it?
LOL
Prison babysitter eh?
Patrick
Before you go on with your insults about something you know nothing
about, I have to ask you where you gather your expertise on the field
of corrections to derive to the conclusion that we are "prison"
babysitters.
Your next whine and/or complain would be???
I guess no one wants to tell you what I did to "your" page...
--
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patr...@io.com) =C2=
=A0Houston, Texas =C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php =C2=A0(TCI's 2006-07 Housto=
n Aeros) AA#2273
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0LAST GAME: =C2=A0M=
ilwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 NEXT GAME:=
=C2=A0Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 12:38:26 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:29 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported
legalized abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=proabortion
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a·bor·tion (prō'ə-bôr'shən)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion —pro·abor·tion·ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the antics of an
illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary, anyway?
Oh brother, that's your attempt now to divert from the fact on what
the dictionary says...how old is it?
LOL
Words can change meanings over time, Sherlock - and new words pop up, too.
Languages evolve, whether you understand it or not. Your particular
obsession, in this case, has moved more towards "favoring abortion as the
choice/solution" than when Merriam-Webster started including it back in the
1960s.
Prison babysitter eh?
Patrick
Before you go on with your insults about something you know nothing
about, I have to ask you where you gather your expertise on the field
of corrections to derive to the conclusion that we are "prison"
babysitters.
You're still at SCI, Sherlock. You made that clear yesterday.
Your next whine and/or complain would be???
I guess no one wants to tell you what I did to "your" page...
Run away again, Incompetent Prison Babysitter. That's one thing you're
qualified for.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 02:34:44 AM |
|
|
On Feb 28, 1:38=C2=A0am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:29=C2=A0am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrot=
e:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08=C2=A0am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> w=
rote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wro=
te:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported
legalized abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. =C2=A0Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=3Dproabortion
Main Entry: pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a=C2=B7bor=C2=B7tion =C2=A0 (pr=C5=8D'=C9=99-b=C3=B4r'sh=C9=99n)
adj. =C2=A0 Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion =E2=80=94pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7t=
ion=C2=B7ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the antics o=
f an
illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary, anywa=
y?
Oh brother, that's your attempt now to divert from the fact on what
the dictionary says...how old is it?
LOL
Words can change meanings over time, Sherlock - and new words pop up, too.
Languages evolve, whether you understand it or not. =C2=A0Your particular
obsession, in this case, has moved more towards "favoring abortion as the
choice/solution" than when Merriam-Webster started including it back in t=
he
1960s. =C2=A0
You have a chance to debunk the definition and come up with something
more up to date, with sources.
Prison babysitter eh?
Patrick
Before you go on with your insults about something you know nothing
about, I have to ask you where you gather your expertise on the field
of corrections to derive to the conclusion that we are "prison"
babysitters.
You're still at SCI, Sherlock. =C2=A0You made that clear yesterday.
So?
Are you that short sighted? Are you that stupid to not realize how
large SCI is and the MANY departments within?
We have work release, VOP, K-9, FTO programs, ect...
Come on Patrick, you are shooting from the hip GUESSING as to what I
do, and the FACT is...
You are clueless.
Give it up already, you will never get it right.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 11:16:26 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:38 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:29 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported
legalized abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=proabortion
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a·bor·tion (prō'ə-bôr'shən)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion —pro·abor·tion·ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the antics of
an illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary,
anyway?
Oh brother, that's your attempt now to divert from the fact on what
the dictionary says...how old is it?
LOL
Words can change meanings over time, Sherlock - and new words pop up, too.
Languages evolve, whether you understand it or not. Your particular
obsession, in this case, has moved more towards "favoring abortion as the
choice/solution" than when Merriam-Webster started including it back in the
1960s.
You have a chance to debunk the definition and come up with something
more up to date, with sources.
....says the Incontinent Prison Babysitter of SCI, anyway.
Prison babysitter eh?
Patrick
Before you go on with your insults about something you know nothing
about, I have to ask you where you gather your expertise on the field
of corrections to derive to the conclusion that we are "prison"
babysitters.
You're still at SCI, Sherlock. You made that clear yesterday.
So?
So, you're doing your usual song and dance.
Are you that short sighted? Are you that stupid to not realize how
large SCI is and the MANY departments within?
We have work release, VOP, K-9, FTO programs, ect...
In a state that has about as many people as one of our adjacent counties?
Come on Patrick, you are shooting from the hip GUESSING as to what I
do, and the FACT is...
You are clueless.
Give it up already, you will never get it right.
Live by your own advice, Heishman. I don't claim to be omniscient, like you
try to promote. You're not doing your rotten image any favors by your online
charade.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 11:22:00 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@fnord.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz2yjj85.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:38 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:29 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com>
wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported
legalized abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of
almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=proabortion
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a·bor·tion (prō'T-bôr'shTn)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion ?"pro·abor·tion·ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the antics
of
an illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary,
anyway?
Oh brother, that's your attempt now to divert from the fact on what
the dictionary says...how old is it?
LOL
Words can change meanings over time, Sherlock - and new words pop up,
too.
Languages evolve, whether you understand it or not. Your particular
obsession, in this case, has moved more towards "favoring abortion as
the
choice/solution" than when Merriam-Webster started including it back in
the
1960s.
You have a chance to debunk the definition and come up with something
more up to date, with sources.
...says the Incontinent Prison Babysitter of SCI, anyway.
Tell me what your experience is with corrections to make you come to the
conclusion that correctional officers are "prison babysitters"?
Prison babysitter eh?
Patrick
Before you go on with your insults about something you know nothing
about, I have to ask you where you gather your expertise on the field
of corrections to derive to the conclusion that we are "prison"
babysitters.
You're still at SCI, Sherlock. You made that clear yesterday.
So?
So, you're doing your usual song and dance.
Are you that short sighted? Are you that stupid to not realize how
large SCI is and the MANY departments within?
We have work release, VOP, K-9, FTO programs, ect...
In a state that has about as many people as one of our adjacent counties?
You have no idea what work release centers are, or VOP centers, or K-9 units
(ours happens to be one of the best), or what FTO programs are..which I am a
part of. (hint)
Come on Patrick, you are shooting from the hip GUESSING as to what I
do, and the FACT is...
You are clueless.
Give it up already, you will never get it right.
Live by your own advice, Heishman. I don't claim to be omniscient, like
you
try to promote. You're not doing your rotten image any favors by your
online
charade.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 09:17:52 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@fnord.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmz2yjj85.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:38 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:29 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported
legalized abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=proabortion
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a·bor·tion (prō'T-bôr'shTn)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro·abor·tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion ?"pro·abor·tion·ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the antics of
an illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary,
anyway?
Oh brother, that's your attempt now to divert from the fact on what
the dictionary says...how old is it?
LOL
Words can change meanings over time, Sherlock - and new words pop up, too.
Languages evolve, whether you understand it or not. Your particular
obsession, in this case, has moved more towards "favoring abortion as the
choice/solution" than when Merriam-Webster started including it back in the
1960s.
You have a chance to debunk the definition and come up with something
more up to date, with sources.
...says the Incontinent Prison Babysitter of SCI, anyway.
Tell me what your experience is with corrections to make you come to the
conclusion that correctional officers are "prison babysitters"?
That's not what I said - that's your inability (or refusal, pick one of two)
to understand what you read. I'm talking to YOU, Heishman.
Prison babysitter eh?
Patrick
Before you go on with your insults about something you know nothing
about, I have to ask you where you gather your expertise on the field
of corrections to derive to the conclusion that we are "prison"
babysitters.
You're still at SCI, Sherlock. You made that clear yesterday.
So?
So, you're doing your usual song and dance.
Are you that short sighted? Are you that stupid to not realize how large
SCI is and the MANY departments within? We have work release, VOP, K-9,
FTO programs, ect...
In a state that has about as many people as one of our adjacent counties?
You have no idea what work release centers are, or VOP centers, or K-9 units
(ours happens to be one of the best), or what FTO programs are..which I am a
part of. (hint)
Really? K-9 units have been around this part of Texas as far as I can
remember. FTO is apparently a Delaware term. Work release and VOP are old
hat here, too.
I'll look forward to the investigation running its due course, and will not
rely on you to find their conclusions - since you have a documented history of
lying in this medium.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "L.S." |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
01 Mar 2007 08:17:17 AM |
|
|
On Feb 28, 11:22 am, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patr...@fnord.io.com> wrote in messagenews:szkmz2=
yjj85.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:38=C2 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:29=C2 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wr=
ote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08=C2 am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com>
wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com.=
..=2E
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or support=
ed
legalized abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of
almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. =C2 Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=3Dproabortion
Main Entry: pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-a=C2=B7bor=C2=B7tion =C2 (pr=C5 '=C9T-b=C3=B4r'sh=C9Tn)
adj. =C2 Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7tion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion =E2?"pro=C2=B7abor=C2=B7t=
ion=C2=B7ist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the anti=
cs
of
an illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary,
anyway?
Oh brother, that's your attempt now to divert from the fact on what
the dictionary says...how old is it?
LOL
Words can change meanings over time, Sherlock - and new words pop up,
too.
Languages evolve, whether you understand it or not. =C2 Your particul=
ar
obsession, in this case, has moved more towards "favoring abortion as
the
choice/solution" than when Merriam-Webster started including it back =
in
the
1960s. =C2
You have a chance to debunk the definition and come up with something
more up to date, with sources.
...says the Incontinent Prison Babysitter of SCI, anyway.
Tell me what your experience is with corrections to make you come to the
conclusion that correctional officers are "prison babysitters"?
Prison babysitter eh?
Patrick
Before you go on with your insults about something you know nothing
about, I have to ask you where you gather your expertise on the field
of corrections to derive to the conclusion that we are "prison"
babysitters.
You're still at SCI, Sherlock. =C2 You made that clear yesterday.
So?
So, you're doing your usual song and dance.
Are you that short sighted? Are you that stupid to not realize how
large SCI is and the MANY departments within?
We have work release, VOP, K-9, FTO programs, ect...
In a state that has about as many people as one of our adjacent countie=
s?
You have no idea what work release centers are, or VOP centers, or K-9 un=
its
(ours happens to be one of the best), or what FTO programs are..which I a=
m a
part of. (hint)
You're still a loser.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 04:45:18 AM |
|
|
In article <1172651684.885234.141070@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Feb 28, 1:38am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:29am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 28, 1:08am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported
legalized abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=proabortion
Main Entry: proabortion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-abortion (pr?'-br'shrn)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: proabortion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion proabortionist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Too bad that's your fantasy, since I'm not embarrassed by the antics of
an
illiterate prison babysitter...and how old *is* that dictionary, anyway?
Oh brother, that's your attempt now to divert from the fact on what
the dictionary says...how old is it?
LOL
Words can change meanings over time, Sherlock - and new words pop up, too.
Languages evolve, whether you understand it or not. Your particular
obsession, in this case, has moved more towards "favoring abortion as the
choice/solution" than when Merriam-Webster started including it back in the
1960s.
You have a chance to debunk the definition and come up with something
more up to date, with sources.
Consider it debunked.
pro |pro?| |pr??|
noun ( pl. pros) (usu. pros)
In favor of : [as prep. ] they were pro the virtues of individualism.
ORIGIN late Middle English (as a noun): from Latin, literally for, on
behalf of.
abortion |??b?r sh ?n| |??b?r??n| |??b???(?)n|
noun
1 the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed
during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy.
the expulsion of a fetus from the uterus by natural causes before it
is able to survive independently.
Biology the arrest of the development of an organ, typically a seed
or fruit.
2 an object or undertaking regarded by the speaker as unpleasant or
badly made or carried out.
ORIGIN mid 16th cent.: from Latin abortio(n-), from aboriri miscarry
(see abort ).
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 04:45:16 AM |
|
|
In article <1172643169.649014.267010@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Feb 28, 1:08am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> writes:
On Feb 27, 6:51 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legalized
abortion.
Your definition is in the minority.
It's not "my" definition. It happens to be the definition of almost
every recognized dictionary.
What a surprise. Running away from the facts again, Bobby?
The fact is:
Dictionary defines pro-abortion as one who favors and/or supports
legalized abortion.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=proabortion
Main Entry: proabortion
Pronunciation: "prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pro-abortion
pro-abortion (pr?' -br'sh n)
adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion.
Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary - Cite This Source
Main Entry: proabortion
Pronunciation: (')prO-&-'bor-sh&n
Function: adjective
: favoring the legalization of abortion proabortionist /-
sh(&-)n&st/ noun
I LOVE EMBARRASSING YOU LIKE THIS..:o)
Your next whine and/or complain would be???
Why do you keep trotting out this old argument? It is clear you are
being dishonest about this.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p." |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 07:33:53 AM |
|
|
On 27 Feb., 19:50, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legalized
abortion.
I am in favor of abortion being legal, that does not make me pro-
abortion. The very word "pro-abortion" is an obvious bit of dishonest
propaganda designed to smear and to make actual dialogue difficult if
not possible. You are an example of the second intention's success.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
27 Feb 2007 02:41:16 PM |
|
|
In news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
dkat <dkatster@gmail.com> typed:
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
Where do you live?
In Antarctica?
Many of us who would never have an abortion are still pro-choice.
Would that be five people?
A woman must have control of her own body
Without interferring with another person's body.
and as long as you are in the first trimester where Roe vs Wade gave this
option, it is pretty clear that the only
argument against it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
So, the mystical God exists in a quadrant?
Which one?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
27 Feb 2007 05:55:12 PM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
dkat <dkatster@gmail.com> typed:
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
Where do you live?
In Antarctica?
He's right here in the good old USA.
Many of us who would never have an abortion are still pro-choice.
Would that be five people?
Put a few ciphers after it, and you'll be closer to the right number.
A woman must have control of her own body
Without interferring with another person's body.
There's only one person involved - the woman - and she gets to make the
choice.
and as long as you are in the first trimester where Roe vs Wade gave this
option, it is pretty clear that the only argument against it is pretty much
in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
So, the mystical God exists in a quadrant?
Which one?
Have your caretakers try to teach you what "quadrant" means in the first
place.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 11:14:48 PM |
|
|
In news:szkirdncg0v.fsf@eris.io.com,
The Chief Instigator <patrick@eris.io.com> typed:
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
dkat <dkatster@gmail.com> typed:
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
Where do you live?
In Antarctica?
He's right here in the good old USA.
Many of us who would never have an abortion are still pro-choice.
Would that be five people?
Put a few ciphers after it, and you'll be closer to the right number.
A woman must have control of her own body
Without interferring with another person's body.
There's only one person involved - the woman - and she gets to make
the choice.
Why are you for rape so much?
and as long as you are in the first trimester where Roe vs Wade
gave this option, it is pretty clear that the only argument against
it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
So, the mystical God exists in a quadrant?
Which one?
Have your caretakers try to teach you what "quadrant" means in the
first place.
You went berzerk again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
01 Mar 2007 12:34:42 AM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:szkirdncg0v.fsf@eris.io.com,
The Chief Instigator <patrick@eris.io.com> typed:
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
dkat <dkatster@gmail.com> typed:
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
Where do you live?
In Antarctica?
He's right here in the good old USA.
Many of us who would never have an abortion are still pro-choice.
Would that be five people?
Put a few ciphers after it, and you'll be closer to the right number.
A woman must have control of her own body
Without interferring with another person's body.
There's only one person involved - the woman - and she gets to make
the choice.
Why are you for rape so much?
Why are you a delusional dolt? (If I was for rape so much, I wouldn't be
posting. See if one of your caretakers can explain why.)
and as long as you are in the first trimester where Roe vs Wade
gave this option, it is pretty clear that the only argument against
it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
So, the mystical God exists in a quadrant?
Which one?
Have your caretakers try to teach you what "quadrant" means in the
first place.
You went berzerk again.
Quit ranting at yourself online, Wentzky. It's already established that you
are seriously mentally ill.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D.Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
01 Mar 2007 07:28:58 AM |
|
|
In news:szk649l8oal.fsf@fnord.io.com,
The Chief Instigator <patrick@fnord.io.com> typed:
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:szkirdncg0v.fsf@eris.io.com,
The Chief Instigator <patrick@eris.io.com> typed:
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
dkat <dkatster@gmail.com> typed:
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
Where do you live?
In Antarctica?
He's right here in the good old USA.
Many of us who would never have an abortion are still pro-choice.
Would that be five people?
Put a few ciphers after it, and you'll be closer to the right
number.
A woman must have control of her own body
Without interferring with another person's body.
There's only one person involved - the woman - and she gets to make
the choice.
Why are you for rape so much?
Why are you a delusional dolt? (If I was for rape so much, I
wouldn't be posting. See if one of your caretakers can explain why.)
and as long as you are in the first trimester where Roe vs Wade
gave this option, it is pretty clear that the only argument
against it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
So, the mystical God exists in a quadrant?
Which one?
Have your caretakers try to teach you what "quadrant" means in the
first place.
You went berzerk again.
Quit ranting at yourself online, Wentzky.
You idolize me so much you have to put that in?
It's already established that you are seriously mentally ill.
Why is it a pro-rapist, roevwadedom liar's protector thinks that I am
mentally ill?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
01 Mar 2007 11:06:09 AM |
|
|
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:szk649l8oal.fsf@fnord.io.com,
The Chief Instigator <patrick@fnord.io.com> typed:
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:szkirdncg0v.fsf@eris.io.com,
The Chief Instigator <patrick@eris.io.com> typed:
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
In news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
dkat <dkatster@gmail.com> typed:
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
Where do you live?
In Antarctica?
He's right here in the good old USA.
Many of us who would never have an abortion are still pro-choice.
Would that be five people?
Put a few ciphers after it, and you'll be closer to the right
number.
A woman must have control of her own body
Without interferring with another person's body.
There's only one person involved - the woman - and she gets to make
the choice.
Why are you for rape so much?
Why are you a delusional dolt? (If I was for rape so much, I
wouldn't be posting. See if one of your caretakers can explain why.)
and as long as you are in the first trimester where Roe vs Wade
gave this option, it is pretty clear that the only argument
against it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
So, the mystical God exists in a quadrant?
Which one?
Have your caretakers try to teach you what "quadrant" means in the
first place.
You went berzerk again.
Quit ranting at yourself online, Wentzky.
You idolize me so much you have to put that in?
You're certifiably delusional, AFAIC.
It's already established that you are seriously mentally ill.
Why is it a pro-rapist, roevwadedom liar's protector thinks that I am
mentally ill?
You've only provided a few terabytes of evidence to support that opinion in
the years you've cluttered Usenet, for a start.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 1 (February 25)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 2 at Omaha, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 04:48:07 AM |
|
|
On 27-Feb-2007, "Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"dkat" <dkatster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172601588.670153.173080@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
No one I have ever known or met is PRO abortion.
So you have never met anyone who has favored and/or supported legalized
abortion.
Are you saying that if I support legalized mastectomies that I am
pro-mastectomy?
Go ahead, trip up AGAIN.....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "M_P" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
27 Feb 2007 03:03:02 PM |
|
|
On Feb 27, 12:39 pm, "dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...] A woman must have control of her own body
Abortion kills someone else's body.
and as long as you are in the first trimester
where Roe vs Wade gave this option, it is pretty clear that the only
argument against it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
Wrong ... here's an argument against it that isn't in the mystical
'god' quadrant:
In defining what is a person---a holder of rights such as the right to
life---the only reasonable alternative to blatant species-ism is to
START WITH the position that reasoning free-willed individuality (such
as is possessed by adult humans) is unique in its ethical
significance, and thus that all who possess reasoning free-willed
individuality are persons. But we can't stop there, because this group
does not include infants, who have almost without exception in Western
history been regarded as persons. The extension of "all who possess
reasoning free-willed individuality" to include infants seems clear:
they have the potential to develop reasoning free-willed
individuality. So all who possess, or have the potential to get,
reasoning free-willed individuality are persons. This definition of
"person" clearly includes all unborn humans, from conception till
birth.
(I could stop right there, except that "potential" needs to be more
sharply specified. One could argue that a human gamete---sperm or
egg---has the potential to develop reasoning free-willed individuality
by first fusing with a complementary gamete. This is true in a certain
sense of "potential"---but that is a vastly different sense than
applies to zygotes. A zygote has the DNA of one particular human
individual; a gamete has an incomprehensibly larger range of
possibilities---namely, the possibility to fuse with any one of the
incomprehensibly large number of possible complementary gametes---and
thus has a vastly different potential to achieve any one of those
possibilities.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
28 Feb 2007 01:10:37 PM |
|
|
On 27 Feb 2007 13:03:02 -0800, "M_P" <m_p@rocketmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 27, 12:39 pm, "dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...] A woman must have control of her own body
Abortion kills someone else's body.
and as long as you are in the first trimester
where Roe vs Wade gave this option, it is pretty clear that the only
argument against it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
Wrong ... here's an argument against it that isn't in the mystical
'god' quadrant:
In defining what is a person---a holder of rights such as the right to
life---the only reasonable alternative to blatant species-ism is to
START WITH the position that reasoning free-willed individuality (such
as is possessed by adult humans) is unique in its ethical
significance, and thus that all who possess reasoning free-willed
individuality are persons. But we can't stop there, because this group
does not include infants, who have almost without exception in Western
history been regarded as persons. The extension of "all who possess
reasoning free-willed individuality" to include infants seems clear:
they have the potential to develop reasoning free-willed
individuality. So all who possess, or have the potential to get,
reasoning free-willed individuality are persons. This definition of
"person" clearly includes all unborn humans, from conception till
birth.
(I could stop right there, except that "potential" needs to be more
sharply specified. One could argue that a human gamete---sperm or
egg---has the potential to develop reasoning free-willed individuality
by first fusing with a complementary gamete. This is true in a certain
sense of "potential"---but that is a vastly different sense than
applies to zygotes. A zygote has the DNA of one particular human
individual; a gamete has an incomprehensibly larger range of
possibilities---namely, the possibility to fuse with any one of the
incomprehensibly large number of possible complementary gametes---and
thus has a vastly different potential to achieve any one of those
possibilities.)
Assuming for the sake of discussion, that a fetus has all the rights
of a adult human person. No adult has the right to force another to
take care of them. A fetus has no right to control over another
persons body. Not even for a few hours much less 9 months. A fetus has
no more right than a tumor, or pin worms. The woman has a right to
remove either or all of them from her body.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "M_P" |
|
| Title: Re: Top Pro-Abortion Group Endorses Senator Hillary Clinton for President |
02 Mar 2007 02:22:52 PM |
|
|
On Feb 28, 1:10 pm, Robert <rob...@netportusa.com> wrote:
On 27 Feb 2007 13:03:02 -0800, "M_P" <m...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 27, 12:39 pm, "dkat" <dkats...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...] A woman must have control of her own body
Abortion kills someone else's body.
and as long as you are in the first trimester
where Roe vs Wade gave this option, it is pretty clear that the only
argument against it is pretty much in the mystical 'god' quadrant.
Wrong ... here's an argument against it that isn't in the mystical
'god' quadrant:
In defining what is a person---a holder of rights such as the right to
life---the only reasonable alternative to blatant species-ism is to
START WITH the position that reasoning free-willed individuality (such
as is possessed by adult humans) is unique in its ethical
significance, and thus that all who possess reasoning free-willed
individuality are persons. But we can't stop there, because this group
does not include infants, who have almost without exception in Western
history been regarded as persons. The extension of "all who possess
reasoning free-willed individuality" to include infants seems clear:
they have the potential to develop reasoning free-willed
individuality. So all who possess, or have the potential to get,
reasoning free-willed individuality are persons. This definition of
"person" clearly includes all unborn humans, from conception till
birth.
(I could stop right there, except that "potential" needs to be more
sharply specified. One could argue that a hum | | | | |
