True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality?



 Science > Abortion > True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 14

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Krazy K"
Date: 23 Feb 2004 09:25:07 AM
Object: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality?
True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which spawned it? IMO,
homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean living by our ancestors. On
another note, how can we whine about gay's if they're here because of
hetero procreation? Just a thought.
Krazy K
.

User: "Snubis"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 23 Feb 2004 10:07:32 AM
On Mon 23 Feb 2004 10:25:07a,
(Krazy K) wrote
in news:5dbdf251.0402230725.d3d4604@posting.google.com:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which spawned it? IMO,
homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean living by our ancestors. On
another note, how can we whine about gay's if they're here because of
hetero procreation? Just a thought.

The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.
--

.
User: "Shawn \Me\ Hearn"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 23 Feb 2004 06:13:31 PM
In article <200c964ef4f314217fb6c47c06791b40@news.teranews.com>,
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

On Mon 23 Feb 2004 10:25:07a,

(Krazy K) wrote
in news:5dbdf251.0402230725.d3d4604@posting.google.com:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which spawned it? IMO,
homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean living by our ancestors. On
another note, how can we whine about gay's if they're here because of
hetero procreation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.

Like you and other bigots.
.

User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 23 Feb 2004 07:50:26 PM
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:07:32 GMT,
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which spawned it? IMO,
homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean living by our ancestors. On
another note, how can we whine about gay's if they're here because of
hetero procreation? Just a thought.

The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.

Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?
-- Craig Chilton

.
User: "Krazy K"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 02:02:02 PM
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<403aac68.385997@netnews.mchsi.com>...

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:07:32 GMT,
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:



True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which spawned it? IMO,
homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean living by our ancestors. On
another note, how can we whine about gay's if they're here because of
hetero procreation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.


Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?


-- Craig Chilton


Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?
Krazy K
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 03:49:15 PM
On 29 Feb 2004 12:02:02 -0800,
"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.

The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.

Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?

Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?

No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private behaviors,
or to have equal rights free of being discrimated against DUE to
personal and private matters) valuable, and should always be
DEFENDED.
-- Craig Chilton

.
User: "jaonajames"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 04:10:17 PM
"Craig Chilton" <
> wrote in message
news:40445b88.22136825@netnews.mchsi.com...

On 29 Feb 2004 12:02:02 -0800,
"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:



True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.


Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?


Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?


No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private behaviors,
or to have equal rights free of being discrimated against DUE to
personal and private matters) valuable, and should always be
DEFENDED.


-- Craig Chilton


blahahahahahahahaha I am LMAO you filthy disgusting maggot, Sex clubs, gay
bathhouses , gay cruises,. gay parades, sex in public restrooms , male
bondage and prostitution,cross dressing, public displays of lust, massive
unsafe sex. ***** I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.
But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar. The new cry of the fag
"give me liberty". Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?you ***** heads
already have every constitutional protection plus a couple thrown in for
good measure. Like I said something that is banned in 37 states will never
come to be.
Or maybe it is the right to ***** in public you are after? you are always so
vague no one not even you have any idea what you are really after, all you
really say is I want liberty.
.
User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 05:43:17 PM
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> writes:

"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:40445b88.22136825@netnews.mchsi.com...

On 29 Feb 2004 12:02:02 -0800,
"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.

The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.

Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?

Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?

No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private behaviors,
or to have equal rights free of being discrimated against DUE to
personal and private matters) valuable, and should always be
DEFENDED.

blahahahahahahahaha I am LMAO you filthy disgusting maggot, Sex clubs, gay
bathhouses , gay cruises,. gay parades, sex in public restrooms , male
bondage and prostitution,cross dressing, public displays of lust, massive
unsafe sex. ***** I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.

Is that why you're so interested in talking about it, incompetent troller?
(Assuming anyone talking about is gay -- it must have taken all your
brainpower to come up with *that* logic.)

But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar. The new cry of the fag
"give me liberty". Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?you ***** heads
already have every constitutional protection plus a couple thrown in for
good measure. Like I said something that is banned in 37 states will never
come to be.

Yeah, like the possession of liquor, right? (I forgot -- the 1920s might as
well be the Stone Age to you, as nothing before 1980 exists in your tiny
little mind.)

Or maybe it is the right to ***** in public you are after? you are always so
vague no one not even you have any idea what you are really after, all you
really say is I want liberty.

What are YOU after, idiot troll? (Besides showing the world how worthless
your opinion is, I mean.) It's sad to see some anonymous coward who's scared
out of what few wits he ever had by the mere existence of someone who has a
different view of sex, while *this* happily married heterosexual and his wife
couldn't care less that homosexuals are on the road to gaining equal rights
with us straights.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.

User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 06:13:42 PM
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:10:17 GMT,
"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.

The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.

Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?

Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?

No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private behaviors,
or to have equal rights free of being discrimated against DUE to
personal and private matters) valuable, and should always be
DEFENDED.

blahahahahahahahaha...

Let's see. How old are you? About three?

I am LMAO you C

Defenders of personal liberties are "filthy disgusting maggots."
Okay. So noted. (One more stike against the bigots.)

I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.

Since I'm not gay (which I assume your perjorative implies),
you can scratch the word, "you," from that. (You bigots just
HATE it that the straight ALLIES are so many in number that
they probably outnumbr the gays, themselves, by around 5-1,
don't you? LOL!!!)
I've moved that sentence from your paragraph, below, to its
present position, above, so that I can reapond to it.

Sex clubs, ..

Private.

...gay bathhouses,...

Meeting places probably are private. In any case, the
interior of them is NOT in public view.

...gay cruises, ...

Peivate.

...gay parades...

Public, but not a place where people have sex.

...sex in public restrooms...

Have YOU ever caught anyone having sex there?
If not caught, it's not public.

...male bondage...

Public? You jest.

...and prostitution,...

Illegal activity. You can't indict the gay community for it.

...cross dressing,...

NOT sex. Harmless.

...public displays of lust, massive unsafe sex.

Which is unlike that which is done by *hetero*sexuals HOW?

But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar.

Neither. I never lie in my posts, so *you* just told a BLATANT
lie about me. Thus destroying any credibility you *may* have had.
And there's nothing perverted about standing up for personal
liberties. There's a LOT perverted about seeking to DENY equal
rights to any person of group, however -- as YOU are doing.

The new cry of the [gay person]: "give me liberty".
Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?

Why not? If gays marry their same-sex partners, that will
do NO harm to the marriage of straight couples, or to anyone
else. 100% harmless.
<remaining hate-tripe snipped>
-- Craig Chilton

.
User: "jaonajames"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 06:49:40 PM
"Craig Chilton" <
> wrote in message
news:40597792.29315755@netnews.mchsi.com...

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:10:17 GMT,
"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:



True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.


Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?


Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?


No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private behaviors,
or to have equal rights free of being discrimated against DUE to
personal and private matters) valuable, and should always be
DEFENDED.


blahahahahahahahaha...


Let's see. How old are you? About three?

I am LMAO you C


Defenders of personal liberties are "filthy disgusting maggots."

Okay. So noted. (One more stike against the bigots.)

no perverted you are filthy and disgusting


I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.


Since I'm not gay (which I assume your perjorative implies),
you can scratch the word, "you," from that. (You bigots just
HATE it that the straight ALLIES are so many in number that
they probably outnumbr the gays, themselves, by around 5-1,
don't you? LOL!!!)

well atleast you are out numbered 37 to none as far as states are concerned


I've moved that sentence from your paragraph, below, to its
present position, above, so that I can reapond to it.

Sex clubs, ..


Private.

...gay bathhouses,...


Meeting places probably are private. In any case, the
interior of them is NOT in public view.

...gay cruises, ...


Peivate.

...gay parades...


Public, but not a place where people have sex.

...sex in public restrooms...


Have YOU ever caught anyone having sex there?
If not caught, it's not public.

...male bondage...


Public? You jest.

...and prostitution,...


Illegal activity. You can't indict the gay community for it.

...cross dressing,...


NOT sex. Harmless.

see you are not making a case for your augment you are just denying that it
goes on


...public displays of lust, massive unsafe sex.


Which is unlike that which is done by *hetero*sexual HOW?

the topic is Homo , classic evasion


But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar.


Neither. I never lie in my posts, so *you* just told a BLATANT
lie about me. Thus destroying any credibility you *may* have had.

james riske tore you apart

And there's nothing perverted about standing up for personal
liberties. There's a LOT perverted about seeking to DENY equal
rights to any person of group, however -- as YOU are doing.

how the ***** has any one denied you or anyone your civil rights?
not only are you a pervert but paranoid too


The new cry of the [gay person]: "give me liberty".
Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?


Why not? If gays marry their same-sex partners, that will
do NO harm to the marriage of straight couples, or to anyone
else. 100% harmless.

***** the cost of your health care alone is enough and 37 states have
still said no
again explain how your rights are being violated BTW I lived in the Richmond
district for 9 years I know all about gays and their sick behavior

<remaining hate-tripe snipped>


-- Craig Chilton


.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 07:48:47 PM
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:49:40 GMT,
"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.

The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.

Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?

Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?

No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private behaviors,
or to have equal rights free of being discrimated against DUE to
personal and private matters) valuable, and should always be
DEFENDED.

blahahahahahahahaha...

Let's see. How old are you? About three?

I am LMAO you filthy disgusting maggots.

Defenders of personal liberties are "filthy disgusting maggot?."

Okay. So noted. (One more stike against the bigots.)

no perverted you are filthy and disgusting.

You're like a broken propaganda record: No facts and all trash.

I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.

Since I'm not gay (which I assume your perjorative implies),
you can scratch the word, "you," from that. (You bigots just
HATE it that the straight ALLIES are so many in number that
they probably outnumbr the gays, themselves, by around 5-1,
don't you? LOL!!!)

well atleast you are out numbered 37 to none as far as states
are concerned.

And when ONE of those is challenged before the Supreme
Court -- the SAME court that killed off all of the loathsome
"sodomy" laws last June -- the bigoted DOMA laws ALL will
become history, nationwide. And with luck, the SAME decision
will do for same-sex marriage what Roe vs. Wade did for women.
Another EMANCIPATION!

I've moved that sentence from your paragraph, below, to its
present position, above, so that I can respond to it.

Sex clubs, ..

Private.

...gay bathhouses,...

Meeting places probably are private. In any case, the
interior of them is NOT in public view.

...gay cruises, ...

Peivate.

...gay parades...

Public, but not a place where people have sex.

...sex in public restrooms...

Have YOU ever caught anyone having sex there?
If not caught, it's not public.

...male bondage...

Public? You jest.

...and prostitution,...

Illegal activity. You can't indict the gay community for it.

...cross dressing,...

NOT sex. Harmless.

See you are not making a case for your augment you are
just denying that it goes on.

MY argument support same-sex marriage. YOURS are merely
red herrings, since NO valid arguments against same-sex marriage
even EXIST.

...public displays of lust, massive unsafe sex.

Which is unlike that which is done by *hetero*sexual HOW?
the topic is Homo , classic evasion

But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar.

Neither. I never lie in my posts, so *you* just told a BLATANT
lie about me. Thus destroying any credibility you *may* have had.

james riske tore you apart.

LOL!!!! He made a total fool of himself! I proved months ago
that he was twisting my words... and he did. No sensible person in
here gives him ANY credibility. Nor does he deserve any -- any
more than you do.

And there's nothing perverted about standing up for personal
liberties. There's a LOT perverted about seeking to DENY equal
rights to any person of group, however -- as YOU are doing.

how the ***** has any one denied you or anyone your civil rights?

They haven't, as far as I know. But they've denied a LOT of
them to *gays*. Not just same-sex marriage bans, but discrimination
in housing, and in the workplace, too. And as a fair-minded and
sensible egalitarian, I OPPOSE the bigots' hatefulness.

Not only are you a pervert but paranoid too.

Neither one. But I see you haven't lost your talent for being a
pathological liar. (What makes you think anyone gives a rat's *****
for what LIARS like *you* think about anything?)

The new cry of the [gay person]: "give me liberty".

Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?

Why not? If gays marry their same-sex partners, that will
do NO harm to the marriage of straight couples, or to anyone
else. 100% harmless.

***** the cost of your health care alone is enough and 37
states have still said no.

SCREW the bigoted legislators in those 37 states, The Supreme
Court WILL quash their mindless hatefulness. As for health care...
if same-sex marriages significantly encourages monogamy, the cost
of treating STD's will be lessened.

Again explain how your rights are being violated BTW I lived
in the Richmond district for 9 years I know all about gays and
their sick behavior.

Where did you live? Church Hill? THAT wouldn't surprise me,
since you're such an obvious LOSER.
-- Craig Chilton

.
User: "jaonajames"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 08:37:49 PM
"Craig Chilton" <
> wrote in message
news:4063913f.35890215@netnews.mchsi.com...

On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:49:40 GMT,
"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:



True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.


Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?


Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?


No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private

behaviors,

or to have equal rights free of being discrimated against DUE to
personal and private matters) valuable, and should always be
DEFENDED.


blahahahahahahahaha...


Let's see. How old are you? About three?


I am LMAO you filthy disgusting maggots.


Defenders of personal liberties are "filthy disgusting maggot?."

Okay. So noted. (One more stike against the bigots.)


no perverted you are filthy and disgusting.


You're like a broken propaganda record: No facts and all trash.

I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.


Since I'm not gay (which I assume your perjorative implies),
you can scratch the word, "you," from that. (You bigots just
HATE it that the straight ALLIES are so many in number that
they probably outnumbr the gays, themselves, by around 5-1,
don't you? LOL!!!)


well atleast you are out numbered 37 to none as far as states
are concerned.


And when ONE of those is challenged before the Supreme
Court -- the SAME court that killed off all of the loathsome
"sodomy" laws last June -- the bigoted DOMA laws ALL will
become history, nationwide. And with luck, the SAME decision
will do for same-sex marriage what Roe vs. Wade did for women.
Another EMANCIPATION!

I've moved that sentence from your paragraph, below, to its
present position, above, so that I can respond to it.


Sex clubs, ..


Private.


...gay bathhouses,...


Meeting places probably are private. In any case, the
interior of them is NOT in public view.


...gay cruises, ...


Peivate.


...gay parades...


Public, but not a place where people have sex.


...sex in public restrooms...


Have YOU ever caught anyone having sex there?
If not caught, it's not public.


...male bondage...


Public? You jest.


...and prostitution,...


Illegal activity. You can't indict the gay community for it.


...cross dressing,...


NOT sex. Harmless.


See you are not making a case for your augment you are
just denying that it goes on.


MY argument support same-sex marriage. YOURS are merely
red herrings, since NO valid arguments against same-sex marriage
even EXIST.

...public displays of lust, massive unsafe sex.


Which is unlike that which is done by *hetero*sexual HOW?
the topic is Homo , classic evasion


But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar.


Neither. I never lie in my posts, so *you* just told a BLATANT
lie about me. Thus destroying any credibility you *may* have had.


james riske tore you apart.


LOL!!!! He made a total fool of himself! I proved months ago
that he was twisting my words... and he did. No sensible person in
here gives him ANY credibility. Nor does he deserve any -- any
more than you do.

And there's nothing perverted about standing up for personal
liberties. There's a LOT perverted about seeking to DENY equal
rights to any person of group, however -- as YOU are doing.


how the ***** has any one denied you or anyone your civil rights?


They haven't, as far as I know. But they've denied a LOT of
them to *gays*. Not just same-sex marriage bans, but discrimination
in housing, and in the workplace, too. And as a fair-minded and
sensible egalitarian, I OPPOSE the bigots' hatefulness.

Not only are you a pervert but paranoid too.


Neither one. But I see you haven't lost your talent for being a
pathological liar. (What makes you think anyone gives a rat's *****
for what LIARS like *you* think about anything?)

The new cry of the [gay person]: "give me liberty".

Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?


Why not? If gays marry their same-sex partners, that will
do NO harm to the marriage of straight couples, or to anyone
else. 100% harmless.


***** the cost of your health care alone is enough and 37
states have still said no.


SCREW the bigoted legislators in those 37 states, The Supreme
Court WILL quash their mindless hatefulness. As for health care...
if same-sex marriages significantly encourages monogamy, the cost
of treating STD's will be lessened.

Again explain how your rights are being violated BTW I lived
in the Richmond district for 9 years I know all about gays and
their sick behavior.


Where did you live? Church Hill? THAT wouldn't surprise me,
since you're such an obvious LOSER.

that would be you and you still have not quoted how your civil rights are
currently being violated
547 11th ave SF Ca dip ***** that is the Richmond district This is what
everyone has said about you (in a nut shell) you assume and you view your
assumptions as fact. I am an RN and you ? answer a street fairy, I quote
from experience i.e. treating fags and fag related injury and disease. From
seeing them on a daily basis, as far as marriage and queers verses disease
well that is another gay fairy tale. start a new thread fruitloop this one
is boring such as your-self

-- Craig Chilton


.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 11:34:26 PM
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:37:49 GMT,
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.

The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.

Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?

Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?

No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private
behaviors, or to have equal rights free of being discrimated
against DUE to personal and private matters) valuable, and
should always be DEFENDED.

blahahahahahahahaha...

Let's see. How old are you? About three?

I am LMAO you filthy disgusting maggots.

Defenders of personal liberties are "filthy disgusting maggots?"

Okay. So noted. (One more stike against the bigots.)

no perverted you are filthy and disgusting.
You're like a broken propaganda record: No facts and all trash.

I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.

Since I'm not gay (which I assume your perjorative implies),
you can scratch the word, "you," from that. (You bigots just
HATE it that the straight ALLIES are so many in number that
they probably outnumbr the gays, themselves, by around 5-1,
don't you? LOL!!!)

well atleast you are out numbered 37 to none as far as states
are concerned.

And when ONE of those is challenged before the Supreme
Court -- the SAME court that killed off all of the loathsome
"sodomy" laws last June -- the bigoted DOMA laws ALL will
become history, nationwide. And with luck, the SAME decision
will do for same-sex marriage what Roe vs. Wade did for women.
Another EMANCIPATION!

I've moved that sentence from your paragraph, below, to its
present position, above, so that I can respond to it.

Sex clubs, ..

Private.

...gay bathhouses,...

Meeting places probably are private. In any case, the
interior of them is NOT in public view.

...gay cruises, ...

Peivate.

...gay parades...

Public, but not a place where people have sex.

...sex in public restrooms...

Have YOU ever caught anyone having sex there?
If not caught, it's not public.

...male bondage...

Public? You jest.

...and prostitution,...

Illegal activity. You can't indict the gay community for it.

...cross dressing,...

NOT sex. Harmless.

See you are not making a case for your augment you are
just denying that it goes on.

MY argument support same-sex marriage. YOURS are merely
red herrings, since NO valid arguments against same-sex marriage
even EXIST.

...public displays of lust, massive unsafe sex.

Which is unlike that which is done by *hetero*sexual HOW?
the topic is Homo , classic evasion

But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar.

Neither. I never lie in my posts, so *you* just told a BLATANT
lie about me. Thus destroying any credibility you *may* have had.

james riske tore you apart.

LOL!!!! He made a total fool of himself! I proved months ago
that he was twisting my words... and he did. No sensible person in
here gives him ANY credibility. Nor does he deserve any -- any
more than you do.

And there's nothing perverted about standing up for personal
liberties. There's a LOT perverted about seeking to DENY equal
rights to any person of group, however -- as YOU are doing.

how the ***** has any one denied you or anyone your civil rights?

They haven't, as far as I know. But they've denied a LOT of
them to *gays*. Not just same-sex marriage bans, but discrimination
in housing, and in the workplace, too. And as a fair-minded and
sensible egalitarian, I OPPOSE the bigots' hatefulness.

Not only are you a pervert but paranoid too.

Neither one. But I see you haven't lost your talent for being a
pathological liar. (What makes you think anyone gives a rat's *****
for what LIARS like *you* think about anything?)

The new cry of the [gay person]: "give me liberty".

Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?

Why not? If gays marry their same-sex partners, that will
do NO harm to the marriage of straight couples, or to anyone
else. 100% harmless.

***** the cost of your health care alone is enough and 37
states have still said no.

SCREW the bigoted legislators in those 37 states, The Supreme
Court WILL quash their mindless hatefulness. As for health care...
if same-sex marriages significantly encourages monogamy, the cost
of treating STD's will be lessened.

Again explain how your rights are being violated BTW I lived
in the Richmond district for 9 years I know all about gays and
their sick behavior.

Where did you live? Church Hill? THAT wouldn't surprise me,
since you're such an obvious LOSER.

That would be you...

Wrong. Fair-minded egalitarians are almost *never* losers. But
from a moral standpoint, hateful and bigoted opponents of individual
liberties ALWAYS are. That latter would include you.

...and you still have not quoted how your civil rights are currently
being violated.

Really? What part of THIS response, above, were you too
DENSE to comprehend? ---

They haven't, as far as I know. But they've denied a LOT of
them to *gays*. Not just same-sex marriage bans, but discrimination
in housing, and in the workplace, too. And as a fair-minded and
sensible egalitarian, I OPPOSE the bigots' hatefulness.

547 11th ave SF Ca dip ***** that is the Richmond district.

Ah. I thought you were referring to my old home town, Richmond,
VA, which I mentioned in a different post, tonight. (THERE, Church
Hill is the district where most of the drug addicts and losers live.
It would be a perfect neighborhood for a bigoted loser like you.)
I've been to SF dozens of times in my lifetime for brief visits,
but have never lived in it. So am unfamiliar with its districts --
other than the Marina District, which the 1989 earthquake
made famous (or infamous, considering what happened to it.
(They never should have constructed buildings on such land.
Geologists have understood liquifaction for decades.)

This is what everyone has said about you (in a nut shell) you
assume and you view your assumptions as fact. I am an RN
and you?

Owner of Xanadu Enterprises -- a book publishing
company, with an employment service subsidiary, and
physical geographer/geologist/ meteorologist. (The latter
can be covered by the term, "earth scientist.")

... I quote from experience i.e. treating [gays] and ... injury and
disease.

They'd better stay well AWAY from you. You're hateful enough
to be one of those "death angel" type nurses.
<TRIPE snipped>
-- Craig Chilton

.
User: "jaonajames"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 11:48:32 PM
"Craig Chilton" <
> wrote in message
news:4042c5cc.49345108@netnews.mchsi.com...

On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:37:49 GMT,
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:



True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.


Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?


Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?


No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them. Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private
behaviors, or to have equal rights free of being discrimated
against DUE to personal and private matters) valuable, and
should always be DEFENDED.


blahahahahahahahaha...


Let's see. How old are you? About three?


I am LMAO you filthy disgusting maggots.


Defenders of personal liberties are "filthy disgusting maggots?"

Okay. So noted. (One more stike against the bigots.)


no perverted you are filthy and disgusting.


You're like a broken propaganda record: No facts and all trash.


I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.


Since I'm not gay (which I assume your perjorative implies),
you can scratch the word, "you," from that. (You bigots just
HATE it that the straight ALLIES are so many in number that
they probably outnumbr the gays, themselves, by around 5-1,
don't you? LOL!!!)


well atleast you are out numbered 37 to none as far as states
are concerned.


And when ONE of those is challenged before the Supreme
Court -- the SAME court that killed off all of the loathsome
"sodomy" laws last June -- the bigoted DOMA laws ALL will
become history, nationwide. And with luck, the SAME decision
will do for same-sex marriage what Roe vs. Wade did for women.
Another EMANCIPATION!


I've moved that sentence from your paragraph, below, to its
present position, above, so that I can respond to it.


Sex clubs, ..


Private.


...gay bathhouses,...


Meeting places probably are private. In any case, the
interior of them is NOT in public view.


...gay cruises, ...


Peivate.


...gay parades...


Public, but not a place where people have sex.


...sex in public restrooms...


Have YOU ever caught anyone having sex there?
If not caught, it's not public.


...male bondage...


Public? You jest.


...and prostitution,...


Illegal activity. You can't indict the gay community for it.


...cross dressing,...


NOT sex. Harmless.


See you are not making a case for your augment you are
just denying that it goes on.


MY argument support same-sex marriage. YOURS are merely
red herrings, since NO valid arguments against same-sex marriage
even EXIST.


...public displays of lust, massive unsafe sex.


Which is unlike that which is done by *hetero*sexual HOW?
the topic is Homo , classic evasion


But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar.


Neither. I never lie in my posts, so *you* just told a BLATANT
lie about me. Thus destroying any credibility you *may* have had.


james riske tore you apart.


LOL!!!! He made a total fool of himself! I proved months ago
that he was twisting my words... and he did. No sensible person in
here gives him ANY credibility. Nor does he deserve any -- any
more than you do.


And there's nothing perverted about standing up for personal
liberties. There's a LOT perverted about seeking to DENY equal
rights to any person of group, however -- as YOU are doing.


how the ***** has any one denied you or anyone your civil rights?


They haven't, as far as I know. But they've denied a LOT of
them to *gays*. Not just same-sex marriage bans, but discrimination
in housing, and in the workplace, too. And as a fair-minded and
sensible egalitarian, I OPPOSE the bigots' hatefulness.


Not only are you a pervert but paranoid too.


Neither one. But I see you haven't lost your talent for being a
pathological liar. (What makes you think anyone gives a rat's *****
for what LIARS like *you* think about anything?)


The new cry of the [gay person]: "give me liberty".


Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?


Why not? If gays marry their same-sex partners, that will
do NO harm to the marriage of straight couples, or to anyone
else. 100% harmless.


***** the cost of your health care alone is enough and 37
states have still said no.


SCREW the bigoted legislators in those 37 states, The Supreme
Court WILL quash their mindless hatefulness. As for health care...
if same-sex marriages significantly encourages monogamy, the cost
of treating STD's will be lessened.


Again explain how your rights are being violated BTW I lived
in the Richmond district for 9 years I know all about gays and
their sick behavior.


Where did you live? Church Hill? THAT wouldn't surprise me,
since you're such an obvious LOSER.


That would be you...


Wrong. Fair-minded egalitarians are almost *never* losers. But
from a moral standpoint, hateful and bigoted opponents of individual
liberties ALWAYS are. That latter would include you.

...and you still have not quoted how your civil rights are currently
being violated.


Really? What part of THIS response, above, were you too
DENSE to comprehend? ---

They haven't, as far as I know. But they've denied a LOT of
them to *gays*. Not just same-sex marriage bans, but discrimination
in housing, and in the workplace, too. And as a fair-minded and
sensible egalitarian, I OPPOSE the bigots' hatefulness.


547 11th ave SF Ca dip ***** that is the Richmond district.


Ah. I thought you were referring to my old home town, Richmond,
VA, which I mentioned in a different post, tonight. (THERE, Church
Hill is the district where most of the drug addicts and losers live.
It would be a perfect neighborhood for a bigoted loser like you.)

I've been to SF dozens of times in my lifetime for brief visits,
but have never lived in it. So am unfamiliar with its districts --
other than the Marina District, which the 1989 earthquake
made famous (or infamous, considering what happened to it.
(They never should have constructed buildings on such land.
Geologists have understood liquifaction for decades.)

This is what everyone has said about you (in a nut shell) you
assume and you view your assumptions as fact. I am an RN
and you?


Owner of Xanadu Enterprises -- a book publishing
company, with an employment service subsidiary, and
physical geographer/geologist/ meteorologist. (The latter
can be covered by the term, "earth scientist.")

... I quote from experience i.e. treating [gays] and ... injury and
disease.


They'd better stay well AWAY from you. You're hateful enough
to be one of those "death angel" type nurses.

<TRIPE snipped>

for someone supposed to be so educated you still have no argument as to how
your liberty has been violated and still nothing to back up your claims


-- Craig Chilton


.
User: "Snubis"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 11:39:05 PM
On Mon 01 Mar 2004 12:48:32a, "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote
in news:Q8A0c.8494$ZL7.5242@news02.roc.ny:


"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4042c5cc.49345108@netnews.mchsi.com...

On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:37:49 GMT,
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:



True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.


Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?


Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?


No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them.
Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or
actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath. There's no excuse for such idiocy. Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private
behaviors, or to have equal rights free of being discrimated
against DUE to personal and private matters) valuable, and
should always be DEFENDED.


blahahahahahahahaha...


Let's see. How old are you? About three?


I am LMAO you filthy disgusting maggots.


Defenders of personal liberties are "filthy disgusting
maggots?"

Okay. So noted. (One more stike against the bigots.)


no perverted you are filthy and disgusting.


You're like a broken propaganda record: No facts and all
trash.


I would hate to know what you fruitloops do in private.


Since I'm not gay (which I assume your perjorative implies),
you can scratch the word, "you," from that. (You bigots just
HATE it that the straight ALLIES are so many in number that
they probably outnumbr the gays, themselves, by around 5-1,
don't you? LOL!!!)


well atleast you are out numbered 37 to none as far as states
are concerned.


And when ONE of those is challenged before the Supreme
Court -- the SAME court that killed off all of the loathsome
"sodomy" laws last June -- the bigoted DOMA laws ALL will
become history, nationwide. And with luck, the SAME decision
will do for same-sex marriage what Roe vs. Wade did for women.
Another EMANCIPATION!


I've moved that sentence from your paragraph, below, to its
present position, above, so that I can respond to it.


Sex clubs, ..


Private.


...gay bathhouses,...


Meeting places probably are private. In any case, the
interior of them is NOT in public view.


...gay cruises, ...


Peivate.


...gay parades...


Public, but not a place where people have sex.


...sex in public restrooms...


Have YOU ever caught anyone having sex there?
If not caught, it's not public.


...male bondage...


Public? You jest.


...and prostitution,...


Illegal activity. You can't indict the gay community for it.


...cross dressing,...


NOT sex. Harmless.


See you are not making a case for your augment you are
just denying that it goes on.


MY argument support same-sex marriage. YOURS are merely
red herrings, since NO valid arguments against same-sex marriage
even EXIST.


...public displays of lust, massive unsafe sex.


Which is unlike that which is done by *hetero*sexual HOW?
the topic is Homo , classic evasion


But then again Craig in a known pervert and liar.


Neither. I never lie in my posts, so *you* just told a
BLATANT
lie about me. Thus destroying any credibility you *may* have had.


james riske tore you apart.


LOL!!!! He made a total fool of himself! I proved months ago
that he was twisting my words... and he did. No sensible person in
here gives him ANY credibility. Nor does he deserve any -- any
more than you do.


And there's nothing perverted about standing up for personal
liberties. There's a LOT perverted about seeking to DENY equal
rights to any person of group, however -- as YOU are doing.


how the ***** has any one denied you or anyone your civil
rights?


They haven't, as far as I know. But they've denied a LOT of
them to *gays*. Not just same-sex marriage bans, but discrimination
in housing, and in the workplace, too. And as a fair-minded and
sensible egalitarian, I OPPOSE the bigots' hatefulness.


Not only are you a pervert but paranoid too.


Neither one. But I see you haven't lost your talent for being a
pathological liar. (What makes you think anyone gives a rat's *****
for what LIARS like *you* think about anything?)


The new cry of the [gay person]: "give me liberty".


Liberty to do what Craig? Get married?


Why not? If gays marry their same-sex partners, that will
do NO harm to the marriage of straight couples, or to anyone
else. 100% harmless.


***** the cost of your health care alone is enough and 37
states have still said no.


SCREW the bigoted legislators in those 37 states, The Supreme
Court WILL quash their mindless hatefulness. As for health care...
if same-sex marriages significantly encourages monogamy, the cost
of treating STD's will be lessened.


Again explain how your rights are being violated BTW I lived
in the Richmond district for 9 years I know all about gays and
their sick behavior.


Where did you live? Church Hill? THAT wouldn't surprise me,
since you're such an obvious LOSER.


That would be you...


Wrong. Fair-minded egalitarians are almost *never* losers. But
from a moral standpoint, hateful and bigoted opponents of individual
liberties ALWAYS are. That latter would include you.

...and you still have not quoted how your civil rights are
currently
being violated.


Really? What part of THIS response, above, were you too
DENSE to comprehend? ---

They haven't, as far as I know. But they've denied a LOT of
them to *gays*. Not just same-sex marriage bans, but discrimination
in housing, and in the workplace, too. And as a fair-minded and
sensible egalitarian, I OPPOSE the bigots' hatefulness.


547 11th ave SF Ca dip ***** that is the Richmond district.


Ah. I thought you were referring to my old home town, Richmond,
VA, which I mentioned in a different post, tonight. (THERE, Church
Hill is the district where most of the drug addicts and losers live.
It would be a perfect neighborhood for a bigoted loser like you.)

I've been to SF dozens of times in my lifetime for brief visits,
but have never lived in it. So am unfamiliar with its districts --
other than the Marina District, which the 1989 earthquake
made famous (or infamous, considering what happened to it.
(They never should have constructed buildings on such land.
Geologists have understood liquifaction for decades.)

This is what everyone has said about you (in a nut shell) you
assume and you view your assumptions as fact. I am an RN
and you?


Owner of Xanadu Enterprises -- a book publishing
company, with an employment service subsidiary, and
physical geographer/geologist/ meteorologist. (The latter
can be covered by the term, "earth scientist.")

... I quote from experience i.e. treating [gays] and ... injury and
disease.


They'd better stay well AWAY from you. You're hateful enough
to be one of those "death angel" type nurses.

<TRIPE snipped>

for someone supposed to be so educated you still have no argument as to
how your liberty has been violated and still nothing to back up your
claims

Craig is so kooked out that he makes the filthy faggots and the pervert
Democrats who love them look normal.
--

.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 01 Mar 2004 03:52:10 AM
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 05:39:05 GMT,
Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> ...
...as usual, contributed NOTHING worthwhile. Just more
of his routine and hateful lies and bigotry. (What a tool.)
== bullcrap /off-topic/inane NGs trimmed ==
(LOL!!! As stupid as HE is, he's
probably *posting* from one of 'em!)
-- Craig Chilton

.


User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 01 Mar 2004 03:48:03 AM
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 05:48:32 GMT,
"jaonajames" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"jaonajames" wrote:

[ ... ]

I am an RN. And you?

Owner of Xanadu Enterprises -- a book publishing
company, with an employment service subsidiary, and
physical geographer/geologist/ meteorologist. (The latter
can be covered by the term, "earth scientist.")

... I quote from experience i.e. treating [gays] and ... injury and
disease.

They'd better stay well AWAY from you. You're hateful enough
to be one of those "death angel" type nurses.

<TRIPE snipped>

For someone supposed to be so educated you still have no
argument as to how your liberty has been violated...

*MY* liberties aren't being violated. But the GAYS are being
hatefully and idiotically persecuted for absolutely NOTHING, in
matters of marriage, housing, and employment. Most human rights
activists regard an assualt on ONE person's or group's liberties to be
an assault on *everyone's*, and that's precisely how I feel about it.
There is absolutely NO valid reason for the bigots to be so
hateful and mindless. Discriminating against gays just because they
happen to practice sex differently **in private** is as utterly STUPID
as it would be to discriminate against stamp collectors. Such bigots
are profoundly ignorant people. Most of them probably are mentally
returded to some extent. Such unconscionable hatefulness hasn't
been this rampant in America since the segregationists'
EQUALLY-loathsome agenda went down the Drain of Extinction.

...and still nothing to back up your claims

See above. There is NO EXCUSE for such mindless and
ludicrous bigotry.
-- Craig Chilton

.







User: "Jeff North"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 29 Feb 2004 06:14:01 PM
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:10:17 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
[snip]

| blahahahahahahahaha I am LMAO you filthy disgusting maggot, Sex clubs, gay
| bathhouses , gay cruises,. gay parades, sex in public restrooms , male
| bondage and prostitution,cross dressing, public displays of lust, massive
| unsafe sex.

Become a heterosexual and live a pure, clean, wholesome and no sex
life.
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorth@yourpantsbigpond.net.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.


User: "Krazy K"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 01 Mar 2004 01:28:28 AM
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message
news:<40445b88.22136825@netnews.mchsi.com>...

On 29 Feb 2004 12:02:02 -0800,
"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ctaig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:



True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.


Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?


Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?


No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them.

Including me, the sociopath.

Only
when a person publicly argues against individual liberties, or

Wait, I'm still entitled to an opinion, right?

actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO valid REASON, is
he a sociopath.

Who are you to determine if the reason for my *entitled* opinion is
valid?

There's no excuse for such idiocy.

When did free speech become idiotic?

Individual
liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and private behaviors,

Like *my* personal behavior?

or to have equal rights free of being discrimated against DUE to
personal and private matters) valuable, and should always be
DEFENDED.

I don't decide who has equal rights, I just post opinions which are as
relevant as yours. Next.
Krazy K
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 01 Mar 2004 04:06:35 AM
On 29 Feb 2004 23:28:28 -0800,
Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.

The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.

Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?

Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?

No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them.

Including me, the sociopath.

Only when a person publicly argues against individual
liberties, or actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO
valid REASON, is he a sociopath.

Who are you to determine if the reason for my *entitled*
opinion is valid?

If you're a homophobe, ask yourself if your loathesome agenda
against gays is ANY more justified than that of the segregationists,
40 years ago, against blacks. The FACTS speak for themselves.
There is NO valid reason to discriminate against gays, or DENY
them EQUAL rights, across-the-board. You should be ashamed of
yourself for being a party to such unconscionable stupidity.

There's no excuse for such idiocy.

When did free speech become idiotic?

Only when doing something REALLY dumb, and harmful to other
people. Such as shouting "Fire!!" in a crowded theater when there's
no fire. Or inciting to riot. Or fomenting hate, such as you and
your mindless ilk are doing.

Individual liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and
private behaviors, or to have equal rights free of being discrimated
against DUE to personal and private matters) are valuable, and
should always be DEFENDED.

I don't decide who has equal rights, I just post opinions which
are as relevant as yours. Next.

My posts DEFEND liberties, and yours foment mindless hatred.
You SHOULD be able to recognize the very significant difference.
BUT -- since ignorance and stupidity probably are prerequisits
for BEING bigoted -- probably not.
-- Craig Chilton

.
User: "Krazy K"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 01 Mar 2004 03:53:37 PM
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<404606db.66002215@netnews.mchsi.com>...

On 29 Feb 2004 23:28:28 -0800,
Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:



True. How can homosexuality be equal to that which
spawned it? IMO, homosexuality is a side-effect of unclean
living by our ancestors. On another note, how can we
whine about gay's if they're here because of hetero pro-
creation? Just a thought.


The same reason we can whine about other social deviants.


Ah. People like both of YOU sociopaths, huh?


Because I have an opinion I'm a sociopath?


No. **Everyone** has opinions, and are entitled to them.


Including me, the sociopath.


Only when a person publicly argues against individual
liberties, or actively opposes them in other ways, FOR NO
valid REASON, is he a sociopath.


Who are you to determine if the reason for my *entitled*
opinion is valid?


If you're a homophobe, ask yourself if your loathesome agenda
against gays is ANY more justified than that of the segregationists,
40 years ago, against blacks.

Maybe you can tell me my *loathesome* agenda since all I've done is
post my opinion on "homosexuality". BTW, most hetero parents don't
want their children exposed to homosexuality, which is ruining
American tv IMO. Does that bother you somehow?

The FACTS speak for themselves.
There is NO valid reason to discriminate against gays, or DENY
them EQUAL rights, across-the-board.

By that exact token should *every* mass gathering of sexual deviants
be granted heterosexual benefits? Also, if we let them, pedophiles
would probably like to marry little children. Is there an end to this
pathetic lunacy?

You should be ashamed of
yourself for being a party to such unconscionable stupidity.

And likewise for opening the door to future depravity.

There's no excuse for such idiocy.


When did free speech become idiotic?


Only when doing something REALLY dumb, and harmful to other
people. Such as shouting "Fire!!" in a crowded theater when there's
no fire. Or inciting to riot.

But what about voicing an honest opinion? Am I "allowed" that
privilege or is that just for asinine liberals?

Or fomenting hate, such as you and
your mindless ilk are doing.

Sorry, but homosexuality is a rather poor reason to grant someone
special treatment. Gays can live very comfortable without being
entitled to *our* civil marriage laws. When was the last time you saw
a homeless gay?

Individual liberties (i.e., the freedom to pursue personal and
private behaviors, or to have equal rights free of being discrimated
against DUE to personal and private matters) are valuable, and
should always be DEFENDED.


I don't decide who has equal rights, I just post opinions which
are as relevant as yours. Next.


My posts DEFEND liberties, and yours foment mindless hatred.

So, in your gallant quest for "liberty" you'd deny me mine? Why aren't
you defending my right of free speech, oh great protector?

You SHOULD be able to recognize the very significant difference.

Your posts are Godless, mine are just off-track a bit.

BUT -- since ignorance and stupidity probably are prerequisits
for BEING bigoted -- probably not.


-- Craig Chilton


A reprobate mind makes for nice kindling. Remember that Mr. Liberal.
Next.
Krazy K
.
User: "L. Michael Roberts"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 01 Mar 2004 05:27:51 PM
<flame groups trimmed>
Krazy K wrote:

xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<404606db.66002215@netnews.mchsi.com>...

On 29 Feb 2004 23:28:28 -0800,
Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

If you're a homophobe, ask yourself if your loathesome agenda
against gays is ANY more justified than that of the segregationists,
40 years ago, against blacks.


Maybe you can tell me my *loathesome* agenda since all I've done is
post my opinion on "homosexuality". BTW, most hetero parents don't
want their children exposed to homosexuality, which is ruining
American tv IMO.

If TV shows with gay content/characters were not so popular with the
general audience, the Nelson ratings would detect that in a heartbeat
and the networks would flush them. The program stay on the air BECAUSE
they are popular and get good ratings. In this age of 100 channel cable
and satellite TV, if you don't like channels that have gay
content/characters, CHANGE THE CHANNEL as there are doubtless a plethora
of other channels that will meet your viewing needs/tastes.
<snip>
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
.
User: "Osprey"

Title: Re: True or false: Heterosexual sex inadvertently created homosexuality? 01 Mar 2004 05:39:01 PM
"L. Michael Roberts" <L_Michael_Roberts@NoSpamThanks.net> wrote in message
news:3FP0c.4442$mx4.109755@nnrp1.uunet.ca...

<flame groups trimmed>

Krazy K wrote:

xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message

news:<404606db.66002215@netnews.mchsi.com>...


On 29 Feb 2004 23:28:28 -0800,
Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Krazy K." <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

Snubis <snubis@wp.pl> wrote:

Krazy K. <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote:


<snip>

If you're a homophobe, ask yourself if your loathesome agenda
against gays is ANY more justified than that of the segregationists,
40 years ago, against blacks.


Maybe you can tell me my *loathesome* agenda since all I've done is
post my opinion on "homosexuality". BTW, most hetero parents don't <