| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
18 Jul 2005 03:30:48 PM |
| Object: |
Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence
By JAY REEVES
Associated Press Writer
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) -- An unrepentant Eric Rudolph declared Monday that
abortion must be fought with "deadly force" as a judge sentenced him to
life in prison for setting off a remote-controlled bomb at an abortion
clinic that killed an off-duty police officer and maimed a nurse.
"Children are disposed of at will," the 38-year-old Rudolph said, jabbing
the air in a speech that echoed a rambling manifesto he issued in April
when he pleaded guilty to four bombings in all, including the blast at
the 1996 Atlanta Olympics. "The state is no longer the protector of the
innocents."
Rudolph's fiery statement came as his victims confronted him court,
branding the anti-abortion extremist a cowardly "monster" and recalling
how their lives were devastated by the 1998 clinic bombing in Birmingham.
"It gives me great delight to know you are going to spend the rest of
your life sitting in an 8-by-12 box," said the clinic's director, Diane
Derzis.
Under a plea bargain that spared him a death sentence, Rudolph received
two life sentences without parole for the Birmingham bombing. Next month,
he will receive two more life terms for the deadly Olympic bombing and
two other attacks in Atlanta.
Rudolph spent more than five years on the run in the North Carolina
wilderness, employing the survivalist techniques he learned as a soldier.
He was captured in 2003 while scavenging for food behind a grocery store.
When it was his turn to speak Monday, Rudolph angrily lashed out at
abortion and the Birmingham clinic.
"What they did was participate in the murder of 50 children a week," he
said, shackled at the ankles and wearing a red jail uniform. "Abortion is
murder and because it is murder I believe deadly force is needed to stop
it."
Related Item
Eric Rudolph's Statement
Emily Lyons, the nurse wounded by his bomb, said Rudolph was nothing but
a coward.
"When it was your turn to face death you weren't so brave again," Lyons
said in a forceful voice, occasionally looking across the aisle at
Rudolph. "You want to see a monster, all you have to do is look in the
mirror."
The bombing also killed police officer Robert "Sande" Sanderson outside
the New Woman All Women clinic. Sanderson's widow, speaking with Rudolph
to her back, told the court she will "never forget the look on my son's
face when I told him Sande was gone."
"I want to tell you there is no punishment in my opinion great enough for
Eric Rudolph. When Eric Rudolph leaves this earth and has to face final
judgment, I'm going to leave the final judgment in God's hand," she said.
Seated at the defense table, Rudolph nodded in agreement.
Lyons was wounded by flying nails and other shrapnel. She has undergone
21 operations, lost her left eye and has scars on her arms and legs. She
is no longer able to work.
But she said Rudolph failed to deter her or the work of the women's
clinic.
"I faced five pounds of dynamite and hundreds of nails yet I survived,"
she said. "Do I look afraid? You damaged my body, but you did not create
the fear you sought."
Rudolph faces sentencing Aug. 22 in Atlanta for the Olympic bombing,
which killed one woman and injured more than 100 other people, and for
1997 bombings at an abortion clinic and a gay bar in Atlanta.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/ERIC_RUDOLPH?
SITE=NYELM&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
.
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Eric Rudolphs' only 38. Wonderful !! With luck, he'll **ROT** in prison for SIXTY years! |
18 Jul 2005 06:14:10 PM |
|
|
... And may that bigoted loser SUFFER intolerably during
every single NANOSECOND of it!!
Good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: Eric Rudolphs' only 38. Wonderful !! With luck, he'll **ROT** in prison for SIXTY years! |
18 Jul 2005 10:07:51 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:jqdod1p8emakosnq90qlej95ffsadj3k8o@4ax.com...
... And may that bigoted loser SUFFER intolerably during
every single NANOSECOND of it!!
Good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
One less republican voter, too!
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Eric Rudolphs' only 38. Wonderful !! With luck, he'll **ROT** in prison for SIXTY years! |
20 Jul 2005 03:30:58 PM |
|
|
On 2005-07-18 20:07:51 -0700, "c-bee1" <c-bee1@insightbb.com> said:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:jqdod1p8emakosnq90qlej95ffsadj3k8o@4ax.com...
... And may that bigoted loser SUFFER intolerably during
every single NANOSECOND of it!!
Good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
One less republican voter, too!
LOL!!!
Very true.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peacenik" |
|
| Title: Re: Eric Rudolphs' only 38. Wonderful !! With luck, he'll **ROT** in prison for SIXTY years! |
19 Jul 2005 07:53:12 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:jqdod1p8emakosnq90qlej95ffsadj3k8o@4ax.com...
... And may that bigoted loser SUFFER intolerably during
every single NANOSECOND of it!!
Good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish!
Don't drop the soap, Eric!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Eric Rudolphs' only 38. Wonderful !! With luck, he'll **ROT** in prison for SIXTY years! Let's hope gay chilton is next! |
18 Jul 2005 06:18:16 PM |
|
|
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:
... And may that bigoted loser SUFFER intolerably during
every single NANOSECOND of it!!
Good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish!
WOW you describe yourself so well!
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Eric Rudolphs' only 38. Wonderful !! With luck, he'll **ROT** in prison for SIXTY years! Let's hope gay chilton is next! |
20 Jul 2005 03:30:30 PM |
|
|
On 2005-07-18 16:18:16 -0700, Sir Marksman <noneya111@youwish.com> said:
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:
... And may that bigoted loser SUFFER intolerably during every single
NANOSECOND of it!!
Good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish!
WOW you describe yourself so well!
I take it you are the child of this board?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Eric Rudolphs' only 38. Wonderful !! With luck, he'll **ROT** in prison for SIXTY years! Let's hope gay chilton is next! |
20 Jul 2005 08:00:47 PM |
|
|
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:2005072013303016807%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2005-07-18 16:18:16 -0700, Sir Marksman <noneya111@youwish.com> said:
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:
... And may that bigoted loser SUFFER intolerably during every single
NANOSECOND of it!!
Good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish!
WOW you describe yourself so well!
I take it you are the child of this board?
HUH?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Eric Rudolphs' only 38. Wonderful !! With luck, he'll **ROT** in prison for SIXTY years! Let's hope gay chilton is next! |
20 Jul 2005 08:53:58 PM |
|
|
George <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:
Sir Marksman <noneya111@youwish.com> said:
... And may that bigoted loser SUFFER intolerably during every single
NANOSECOND of it!!
Good riddance to VERY putrid rubbish!
WOW you describe yourself so well!
I take it you are the child of this board?
Good guess.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
18 Jul 2005 04:44:34 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9697A7FEBF540keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence
Rudolph faces sentencing Aug. 22 in Atlanta for the Olympic bombing,
which killed one woman and injured more than 100 other people, and for
1997 bombings at an abortion clinic and a gay bar in Atlanta.
========================
Typical thinking of a religious fundamentalist who feels women should know,
and keep their place. I'm glad he got life. Execution for this
cold-blooded murdering sociopath would have been even better. Now we have
to support his sorry (_|_) for the rest of his life.
--
CR.....
The best defense to logic is ignorance
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/jw-book.html
~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 04:30:06 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. quoted:
Under a plea bargain that spared him a death sentence, Rudolph
received two life sentences without parole for the Birmingham
bombing. Next month, he will receive two more life terms for
the deadly Olympic bombing and two other attacks in Atlanta.
This is partly why I oppose the death penalty. Now, Eric Rudolph has
the rest of his life to ponder his actions, and who knows? Maybe one
day he will understand the enormity of his crimes and feel real
remorse. That opportunity was denied Paul Hill, who went to his death
believing what he did was OK.
.
|
|
|
| User: "EquusScelestus" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 05:33:35 PM |
|
|
Rudolph is just another terrorist like Atta or Bin Laden.
Religious nutjob prepared to murder anyone who disagrees with
his world view.
spartakus@my-deja.com wrote:
james g. keegan jr. quoted:
Under a plea bargain that spared him a death sentence, Rudolph
received two life sentences without parole for the Birmingham
bombing. Next month, he will receive two more life terms for
the deadly Olympic bombing and two other attacks in Atlanta.
This is partly why I oppose the death penalty. Now, Eric Rudolph has
the rest of his life to ponder his actions, and who knows? Maybe one
day he will understand the enormity of his crimes and feel real
remorse. That opportunity was denied Paul Hill, who went to his death
believing what he did was OK.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
18 Jul 2005 11:48:05 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence
By JAY REEVES
Associated Press Writer
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) -- An unrepentant Eric Rudolph declared Monday that
abortion must be fought with "deadly force" as a judge sentenced him to
life in prison for setting off a remote-controlled bomb at an abortion
clinic that killed an off-duty police officer and maimed a nurse.
"Children are disposed of at will," the 38-year-old Rudolph said, jabbing
the air in a speech that echoed a rambling manifesto he issued in April
when he pleaded guilty to four bombings in all, including the blast at
the 1996 Atlanta Olympics. "The state is no longer the protector of the
innocents."
Rudolph's fiery statement came as his victims confronted him court,
branding the anti-abortion extremist a cowardly "monster" and recalling
how their lives were devastated by the 1998 clinic bombing in Birmingham.
"It gives me great delight to know you are going to spend the rest of
your life sitting in an 8-by-12 box," said the clinic's director, Diane
Derzis.
Under a plea bargain that spared him a death sentence, Rudolph received
two life sentences without parole for the Birmingham bombing. Next month,
he will receive two more life terms for the deadly Olympic bombing and
two other attacks in Atlanta.
Rudolph spent more than five years on the run in the North Carolina
wilderness, employing the survivalist techniques he learned as a soldier.
He was captured in 2003 while scavenging for food behind a grocery store.
When it was his turn to speak Monday, Rudolph angrily lashed out at
abortion and the Birmingham clinic.
"What they did was participate in the murder of 50 children a week," he
said, shackled at the ankles and wearing a red jail uniform. "Abortion is
murder and because it is murder I believe deadly force is needed to stop
it."
Related Item
Eric Rudolph's Statement
Emily Lyons, the nurse wounded by his bomb, said Rudolph was nothing but
a coward.
"When it was your turn to face death you weren't so brave again," Lyons
said in a forceful voice, occasionally looking across the aisle at
Rudolph. "You want to see a monster, all you have to do is look in the
mirror."
The bombing also killed police officer Robert "Sande" Sanderson outside
the New Woman All Women clinic. Sanderson's widow, speaking with Rudolph
to her back, told the court she will "never forget the look on my son's
face when I told him Sande was gone."
"I want to tell you there is no punishment in my opinion great enough for
Eric Rudolph. When Eric Rudolph leaves this earth and has to face final
judgment, I'm going to leave the final judgment in God's hand," she said.
Seated at the defense table, Rudolph nodded in agreement.
Lyons was wounded by flying nails and other shrapnel. She has undergone
21 operations, lost her left eye and has scars on her arms and legs. She
is no longer able to work.
But she said Rudolph failed to deter her or the work of the women's
clinic.
"I faced five pounds of dynamite and hundreds of nails yet I survived,"
she said. "Do I look afraid? You damaged my body, but you did not create
the fear you sought."
Rudolph faces sentencing Aug. 22 in Atlanta for the Olympic bombing,
which killed one woman and injured more than 100 other people, and for
1997 bombings at an abortion clinic and a gay bar in Atlanta.
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/ERIC_RUDOLPH?
SITE=NYELM&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneekers" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 05:51:37 AM |
|
|
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 08:12:57 AM |
|
|
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneekers" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 08:44:02 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 09:28:27 AM |
|
|
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them?
I do.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 07:07:14 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them? I do.
You don't think, John. You're insane. End of story.
(713 308-8000, if you're going to whine.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 09:43:43 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<958De.285$dz.1@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them?
f by 'prejudiced you mean people who did not like their actions and
opposed them I would certainly hope so.
I do.
You have demonstrated what you think is irrelevant.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sneekers" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 09:33:18 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them?
No. They were arrested and imprisoned because they broke the law. Had
they peacably protested their two-cents worth without causing a public
disturbance or without endangering the safety and well-being of
people, they would not have been touched.
I do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 10:15:16 AM |
|
|
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:pi3qd1lqnku76v0rl2p37bopcnitp501ms@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them?
No. They were arrested and imprisoned because they broke the law.
Why should they care about the law when the Supreme Court struck down the
law in 1973?
Had
they peacably protested their two-cents worth without causing a public
disturbance or without endangering the safety and well-being of
people, they would not have been touched.
They are doing no differently than the people who broke the law before and
subsequently were able to have the law abolished so that they would escape
guilt.
I see no difference except that the agendas are not congruent.
I do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 10:49:45 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:15:16 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<3N8De.298$dz.173@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:pi3qd1lqnku76v0rl2p37bopcnitp501ms@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them?
No. They were arrested and imprisoned because they broke the law.
Why should they care about the law when the Supreme Court struck down the
law in 1973?
Not the law against murder.
Had
they peacably protested their two-cents worth without causing a public
disturbance or without endangering the safety and well-being of
people, they would not have been touched.
They are doing no differently than the people who broke the law before and
subsequently were able to have the law abolished so that they would escape
guilt.
I see no difference except that the agendas are not congruent.
That is what makes you a dangerous fanatic. Or would if you weren't
so ineffectual.
I do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 11:10:00 AM |
|
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:968qd1ph1p723077qdnamufkcv1hagpkdt@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:15:16 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<3N8De.298$dz.173@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:pi3qd1lqnku76v0rl2p37bopcnitp501ms@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high
risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them?
No. They were arrested and imprisoned because they broke the law.
Why should they care about the law when the Supreme Court struck down the
law in 1973?
Not the law against murder.
*****.
That is exactly the law that they watered-down.
They struck down the law which forbade killing, murdering, conceived human
children in many, many cases.
Had
they peacably protested their two-cents worth without causing a public
disturbance or without endangering the safety and well-being of
people, they would not have been touched.
They are doing no differently than the people who broke the law before and
subsequently were able to have the law abolished so that they would escape
guilt.
I see no difference except that the agendas are not congruent.
That is what makes you a dangerous fanatic.
Not so. That is what makes me rational.
Maybe you consider rational people to be dangerous and irrational persons to
be non-threats to society.
Your mislabelling me does nothing to make me what you say I am.
I am not dangerous.
Or would if you weren't
so ineffectual.
LOL!!!!!!!!!
I know the law.That is why I do not seek to transgress it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 01:44:29 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:10:00 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<nA9De.2424$Wt3.286@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:968qd1ph1p723077qdnamufkcv1hagpkdt@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:15:16 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<3N8De.298$dz.173@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:pi3qd1lqnku76v0rl2p37bopcnitp501ms@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high
risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them?
No. They were arrested and imprisoned because they broke the law.
Why should they care about the law when the Supreme Court struck down the
law in 1973?
Not the law against murder.
*****.
That is exactly the law that they watered-down.
They struck down the law which forbade killing, murdering, conceived human
children in many, many cases.
No, abortion was not murder before R v W, and women who had abortions
and doctors who performed them were not charged with murder.
Had
they peacably protested their two-cents worth without causing a public
disturbance or without endangering the safety and well-being of
people, they would not have been touched.
They are doing no differently than the people who broke the law before and
subsequently were able to have the law abolished so that they would escape
guilt.
I see no difference except that the agendas are not congruent.
That is what makes you a dangerous fanatic.
Not so. That is what makes me rational.
I am sure you think so. Most paranoids have no problem with their
actions.
Maybe you consider rational people to be dangerous and irrational persons to
be non-threats to society.
You have that backwards.
Your mislabelling me does nothing to make me what you say I am.
I am not dangerous
I agree. You are too ineffectual to be dangerous.
Or would if you weren't
so ineffectual.
LOL!!!!!!!!!
I know the law.That is why I do not seek to transgress it.
Why not? Are you afraid to go and kill workers like your hero?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 11:06:31 PM |
|
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:iaiqd15f203vj3089kj2l0q064t440hus4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:10:00 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<nA9De.2424$Wt3.286@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:968qd1ph1p723077qdnamufkcv1hagpkdt@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:15:16 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<3N8De.298$dz.173@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:pi3qd1lqnku76v0rl2p37bopcnitp501ms@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high
risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced
against
them?
No. They were arrested and imprisoned because they broke the law.
Why should they care about the law when the Supreme Court struck down
the
law in 1973?
Not the law against murder.
*****.
That is exactly the law that they watered-down.
They struck down the law which forbade killing, murdering, conceived human
children in many, many cases.
No, abortion was not murder before R v W, and women who had abortions
and doctors who performed them were not charged with murder.
Had
they peacably protested their two-cents worth without causing a public
disturbance or without endangering the safety and well-being of
people, they would not have been touched.
They are doing no differently than the people who broke the law before
and
subsequently were able to have the law abolished so that they would
escape
guilt.
I see no difference except that the agendas are not congruent.
That is what makes you a dangerous fanatic.
Not so. That is what makes me rational.
I am sure you think so. Most paranoids have no problem with their
actions.
Maybe you consider rational people to be dangerous and irrational persons
to
be non-threats to society.
You have that backwards.
Your mislabelling me does nothing to make me what you say I am.
I am not dangerous
I agree. You are too ineffectual to be dangerous.
Or would if you weren't
so ineffectual.
LOL!!!!!!!!!
I know the law.That is why I do not seek to transgress it.
Why not? Are you afraid to go and kill workers like your hero?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Afraid?
Who is afraid of Pro-Choicers?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 11:22:39 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:iaiqd15f203vj3089kj2l0q064t440hus4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:10:00 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<nA9De.2424$Wt3.286@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:968qd1ph1p723077qdnamufkcv1hagpkdt@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:15:16 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<3N8De.298$dz.173@bignews4.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:pi3qd1lqnku76v0rl2p37bopcnitp501ms@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high
risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced
against
them?
No. They were arrested and imprisoned because they broke the law.
Why should they care about the law when the Supreme Court struck down
the
law in 1973?
Not the law against murder.
*****.
That is exactly the law that they watered-down.
They struck down the law which forbade killing, murdering, conceived human
children in many, many cases.
No, abortion was not murder before R v W, and women who had abortions
and doctors who performed them were not charged with murder.
Had
they peacably protested their two-cents worth without causing a public
disturbance or without endangering the safety and well-being of
people, they would not have been touched.
They are doing no differently than the people who broke the law before
and
subsequently were able to have the law abolished so that they would
escape
guilt.
I see no difference except that the agendas are not congruent.
That is what makes you a dangerous fanatic.
Not so. That is what makes me rational.
I am sure you think so. Most paranoids have no problem with their
actions.
Maybe you consider rational people to be dangerous and irrational persons
to
be non-threats to society.
You have that backwards.
Your mislabelling me does nothing to make me what you say I am.
I am not dangerous
I agree. You are too ineffectual to be dangerous.
Or would if you weren't
so ineffectual.
LOL!!!!!!!!!
I know the law.That is why I do not seek to transgress it.
Why not? Are you afraid to go and kill workers like your hero?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Afraid?
Who is afraid of Pro-Choicers?
You seem to be.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
20 Jul 2005 05:33:23 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:06:31 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<54kDe.7122$Wt3.1590@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:
I am not dangerous
I agree. You are too ineffectual to be dangerous.
Or would if you weren't
so ineffectual.
LOL!!!!!!!!!
I know the law.That is why I do not seek to transgress it.
Why not? Are you afraid to go and kill workers like your hero?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Afraid?
Who is afraid of Pro-Choicers?
Since we don't go around killing and terrorizing those who disagree
with us why should anyone be afraid?
On the other hand, the anti-choice faction . . .
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sneekers" |
|
| Title: Re: Unrepentant Rudolph Gets Life Sentence |
19 Jul 2005 12:09:23 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:15:16 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:pi3qd1lqnku76v0rl2p37bopcnitp501ms@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:27 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:aq0qd1p7ealm6p3r98mcg0s4fno9rsh51h@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:57 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Sneekers" <coadviolators@mail.com> wrote in message
news:gompd1tq2553dv3g9t236c7oodqaortamf@4ax.com...
On 18 Jul 2005 21:48:05 -0700, wrote:
Lyons lost an eye. And she can't work. I guess she was in a high risk
occupation.
It doesn't have to be that way, if people just kept their ignorant
prejudices to themselves.
As in throwing anti-gay and anti-abortion citizens in jail?
Do you think they got in there by peacable protest?
Do you think they were put in there by people who are prejudiced against
them?
No. They were arrested and imprisoned because they broke the law.
Why should they care about the law when the Supreme Court struck down the
law in 1973?
The preserved the right of women to have their abortions privately--no
third party decision makers required.
Had
they peacably protested their two-cents worth without causing a public
disturbance or without endangering the safety and well-being of
people, they would not have been touched.
They are doing no differently than the people who broke the law before and
subsequently were able to have the law abolished so that they would escape
guilt.
They did exactly, on a less violent scale, what the likes of Salvi and
Rudolph committed.
I see no difference except that the agendas are not congruent.
You're crazy.
I do.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|