| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Osprey" |
| Date: |
23 Dec 2003 01:29:44 PM |
| Object: |
Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23, 2003 at 10:43 A.M.
From: "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.abortion
Subject: Golden opportunity for James Keegan
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:43:47 -0500
Message-ID: <kpmdnfWQKKG6_nWiRVn-hA@comcast.com>
This is a absolute Golden Opportunity for James Keegan to come out from
hiding and face me.
James Keegan repeats his post claiming I lied about him and 5 others.
Yes, I did claim using my opinion about 6 people, who in my opinion are
pro-abortion.
James Keegan demands a apology.
I will gladly give a apology IF James is willing to face me on this issue
and prove me wrong.
James Keegan
I will apologize to you or anyone else, if you are willing to face me on
this issue, answer a few questions.
In my opinion, you and a few others ARE pro-abortion
Now, we will have to DEFINE the words and DEFINE what we mean. That is in
order to make it ABSOLUTELY CLEAR that we know what we mean.
If you are willing to accept this offer, we will move on. Closing the
chapter to the nonsense you continue to repeat, over and over and over.
You call me a coward. I am right here pal. I am not going anywhere. I am
fully prepared to defend my position and my opinion on you. I am fully
prepared to PROVE my opinion is right, and if you can PROVE it to be wrong,
I will gladly state FOR the record for ALL to see a formal apology.
James Keegan
Do you
a) Accept _________
b) Decline _________
If you choose to decline, you shall be the coward you claim I am.
If you choose to accept, we shall create a separate thread, DEFINE the
terms, and answer the CLARIFY our position.
The choice is yours. I hope you choose wisely. For this will prove just
who the coward is.
Come on James Keegan, be a man. Face me.
As of 2:03 EST, James Keegan has been presented this challenge over 40
times. Each and every time, James ignores the challenge and refuses to
answer.
James Keegan is pinned, he knows he has no escape. He has chosen the path
of being a coward, and refusing to face me on his claims.
James Keegan is defeated.
James Keegan is now left to nothing but rambling on and on. He refuses to
accept the challenge. He knows he would lose. He makes excuses.
SLAM DUNK...James is done
On top of James cowardness, he snips out the challenge and also has not
apologized for his lie saying that I claimed to be in the Military Police
By the way Cowardness Keegan, if you are reading. In the Air Force, it is
called Security Police,
This is obvious proof that James realizes he can't win. He is reduced to
rambling and repeating.
I will continue to keep this open to James if he should ever decide to be a
man and come face me.
James knows he can't win the challenge. He knows I did not lie; however,
his imagination and lack of ability to have reasonable thoughts prevents him
from coming forward.
James, like many others knows that I can defend my position. Like most
cowards, they want to pretend that I can't. They know better.
If I lied, James would come forward in a heartbeat and show me. But he
doesn't do that. Instead, he rambles.
James does this to anyone who disagrees with him. I am sure that Patrick
and his other friends will naturally be proud of his cowardness. Even
though they see I am right here, ready, willing, and capable of defending my
position and James continues to run.
James Keegan, you do a great job in helping me prove how cowardly you and
other pro-abortionist are.
Any day Keegan, you decide to be a man and prove your claims, I shall be
right here ready to face you. You know you can't win.
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 01:18:34 AM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23, 2003 at 10:43 A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little boy.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 07:47:19 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23, 2003 at 10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge for a reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I challenge can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like you just said
above..:o)
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 10:20:10 AM |
|
|
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23, 2003 at 10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge for a reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I challenge can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like you just said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you are. No
one takes you seriously and you know that. You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about what you
want to talk about. That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect from those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you "beat" people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is true - we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no honor, no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for some
introspection on your part.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 10:41:31 AM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23, 2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge for a reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I challenge can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like you just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you didn't know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James, and Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about what you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and the others on the
challenge.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find out.
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect from those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you "beat" people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is true - we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no honor, no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 01:48:28 PM |
|
|
In article <vuWdnaQxwcgvjnaiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23, 2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge for a reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I challenge can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like you just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you didn't know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
No you don't. You have the right to offer your opinion. Stop acting
as though when you "challenge" someone it means something when they
ignore you. All it means is you offer nothing to the conversation.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James, and Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
Challenge, run, coward - you are a joke.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
I mean what I said. NO ONE.
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about what you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and the others on the
challenge.
You are the most prolific liar on this newsgroup. Hands down. You
beat NO ONE.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find out.
I have "faced you" and beat you to a pulp so many times it got boring.
You NEVER offered a resonable reply. Instead, you simply lied. As you
are doing now.
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
OK-
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted criminal."
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of parole,
is required to stay away from children?
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect from those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you "beat" people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is true - we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no honor, no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
I doubt it. You were challenged... And you "ran."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 01:50:29 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031148289631%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <vuWdnaQxwcgvjnaiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23, 2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge for a
reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I challenge
can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like you
just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you didn't know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
No you don't.
I don't?
Please show me the law that says I don't have a right to challenge you.
You have the right to offer your opinion.
I have a right to challenge you
Stop acting
as though when you "challenge" someone it means something when they
ignore you. All it means is you offer nothing to the conversation.
This is all a diversion attempt to distract off the issue
You will not engage because if you engaged I would embarrass you in front of
everyone by showing you can't defend your claims.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James, and Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
Challenge, run, coward - you are a joke.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
I mean what I said. NO ONE.
So?
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about what you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and the others on
the
challenge.
You are the most prolific liar on this newsgroup. Hands down. You
beat NO ONE.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find out.
I have "faced you"
You have never faced me. You are too scared.
I have so many of your post saved that proves you come up with lame excuses
like
"I am not going to get into this again"
"Republican propaganda"
"I all ready answered that"
"If you are too lazy to look it up"
bla bla bla...nothing but nonsense.
and beat you to a pulp so many times it got boring.
You NEVER offered a resonable reply. Instead, you simply lied. As you
are doing now.
I am ready, willing, prepared, right here. Any day David, you wish to be a
man and face me.
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
OK-
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
No
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted criminal."
no
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
I said you did some time
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of parole,
is required to stay away from children?
no
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
no
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
no
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
I have told you, google
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect from those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you "beat"
people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is true - we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no honor, no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
I doubt it. You were challenged... And you "ran."
Nope,
I never did a investigation on you
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 03:11:16 PM |
|
|
In article <z82dnUEHt5hhonaiRVn-uQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031148289631%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <vuWdnaQxwcgvjnaiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23, 2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge for a
reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I challenge
can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like you
just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you didn't know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
No you don't.
I don't?
Please show me the law that says I don't have a right to challenge you.
Since when does the law mean anything to you?
You have the right to offer your opinion.
I have a right to challenge you
Stop repeating your mistakes... Child.
Stop acting
as though when you "challenge" someone it means something when they
ignore you. All it means is you offer nothing to the conversation.
This is all a diversion attempt to distract off the issue
You know better than I what your motivations are...
You will not engage because if you engaged I would embarrass you in front of
everyone by showing you can't defend your claims.
I have "engaged" you hundreds of time. You have NEVER offered
anything. As YOU would say, you always "lose." LOL! Sorry - I got
bored with it. This is more fun - you are a Sunfish, not a Marlin.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James, and Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
Challenge, run, coward - you are a joke.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
I mean what I said. NO ONE.
So?
You tell me. YOU replied.
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about what you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and the others on
the
challenge.
You are the most prolific liar on this newsgroup. Hands down. You
beat NO ONE.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find out.
I have "faced you"
You have never faced me. You are too scared.
You live in a dream world.
I have so many of your post saved that proves you come up with lame excuses
like
"I am not going to get into this again"
RIGHT. Do you understand what the word "again" means?
"Republican propaganda"
Explain what your understanding of propaganda is.
"I all ready answered that"
Right. As in "already answered."
"If you are too lazy to look it up"
You are lazy. Look it up - moron. It isn't my job to teach you the
basics.
bla bla bla...nothing but nonsense.
What you view as nonsense is EVERYONE'S refusal to repeatedly tell you
the same things.
and beat you to a pulp so many times it got boring.
You NEVER offered a resonable reply. Instead, you simply lied. As you
are doing now.
I am ready, willing, prepared, right here. Any day David, you wish to be a
man and face me.
Lies
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
OK-
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
No
Glad to see you back down.
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted criminal."
no
Glad to see you back down.
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
I said you did some time
Great - PROVE IT. (or run...)
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of parole,
is required to stay away from children?
no
Glad to see you back down.
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
no
Glad to see you back down.
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
no
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
I have told you, google
What is the url?
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect from those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you "beat"
people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is true - we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no honor, no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
I doubt it. You were challenged... And you "ran."
Nope,
I never did a investigation on you
I know. I never said you did. You did.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 03:29:12 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031311167737%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <z82dnUEHt5hhonaiRVn-uQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031148289631%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <vuWdnaQxwcgvjnaiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23,
2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little
boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge for a
reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I challenge
can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like you
just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you
are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you didn't
know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
No you don't.
I don't?
Please show me the law that says I don't have a right to challenge you.
Since when does the law mean anything to you?
You have the right to offer your opinion.
I have a right to challenge you
Stop repeating your mistakes... Child.
Stop acting
as though when you "challenge" someone it means something when they
ignore you. All it means is you offer nothing to the conversation.
This is all a diversion attempt to distract off the issue
You know better than I what your motivations are...
You will not engage because if you engaged I would embarrass you in
front of
everyone by showing you can't defend your claims.
I have "engaged" you hundreds of time.
Never,
and it is so easy to prove.
All I have to do is just ask you to show the proof.
I have tons of files on hand, that show your comments, your claims, your
lies, that you refuse to answer too.
You have NEVER offered
anything. As YOU would say, you always "lose." LOL! Sorry - I got
bored with it. This is more fun - you are a Sunfish, not a Marlin.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James, and Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
Challenge, run, coward - you are a joke.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
I mean what I said. NO ONE.
So?
You tell me. YOU replied.
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about what
you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and the others
on
the
challenge.
You are the most prolific liar on this newsgroup. Hands down. You
beat NO ONE.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find out.
I have "faced you"
You have never faced me. You are too scared.
You live in a dream world.
I have so many of your post saved that proves you come up with lame
excuses
like
"I am not going to get into this again"
RIGHT. Do you understand what the word "again" means?
Yes, it means you can't engage
"Republican propaganda"
Explain what your understanding of propaganda is.
You are the one who uses it.
"I all ready answered that"
Right. As in "already answered."
No, as in "I don't want to engage"
"If you are too lazy to look it up"
You are lazy. Look it up - moron. It isn't my job to teach you the
basics.
Again, another attempt to not engage
bla bla bla...nothing but nonsense.
What you view as nonsense is EVERYONE'S refusal to repeatedly tell you
the same things.
and beat you to a pulp so many times it got boring.
You NEVER offered a resonable reply. Instead, you simply lied. As
you
are doing now.
I am ready, willing, prepared, right here. Any day David, you wish to
be a
man and face me.
Lies
Where is the lie? I am here
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
OK-
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
No
Glad to see you back down.
Not backing down at all. I didn't say that.
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
I said you did some time
Great - PROVE IT. (or run...)
I have, time and time again. You served time
You are serving time right now
You work a 8 hour day, you served 8 hours
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
no
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
I have told you, google
What is the url?
Go to google, do some searches
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect from
those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you "beat"
people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is true -
we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no honor,
no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
I doubt it. You were challenged... And you "ran."
Nope,
I never did a investigation on you
I know. I never said you did. You did.
Nope, wrong again, I didn't say that.
Thanks for playing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 04:43:28 PM |
|
|
In article <IaWdnbGAldKDynaiRVn-hQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031311167737%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <z82dnUEHt5hhonaiRVn-uQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031148289631%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <vuWdnaQxwcgvjnaiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23,
2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges", little
boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge for a
reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I challenge
can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like you
just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you
are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you didn't
know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
No you don't.
I don't?
Please show me the law that says I don't have a right to challenge you.
Since when does the law mean anything to you?
You have the right to offer your opinion.
I have a right to challenge you
Stop repeating your mistakes... Child.
Stop acting
as though when you "challenge" someone it means something when they
ignore you. All it means is you offer nothing to the conversation.
This is all a diversion attempt to distract off the issue
You know better than I what your motivations are...
You will not engage because if you engaged I would embarrass you in
front of
everyone by showing you can't defend your claims.
I have "engaged" you hundreds of time.
Never,
and it is so easy to prove.
All I have to do is just ask you to show the proof.
I made it my policy, long ago, that wasn't going to keep repeating the
arguments I offered you because you are too stupid to understand them.
I have tons of files on hand, that show your comments, your claims, your
lies, that you refuse to answer too.
Then sit there and read them I don't really care.
You have NEVER offered
anything. As YOU would say, you always "lose." LOL! Sorry - I got
bored with it. This is more fun - you are a Sunfish, not a Marlin.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James, and Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
Challenge, run, coward - you are a joke.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
I mean what I said. NO ONE.
So?
You tell me. YOU replied.
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about what
you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and the others
on
the
challenge.
You are the most prolific liar on this newsgroup. Hands down. You
beat NO ONE.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find out.
I have "faced you"
You have never faced me. You are too scared.
You live in a dream world.
I have so many of your post saved that proves you come up with lame
excuses
like
"I am not going to get into this again"
RIGHT. Do you understand what the word "again" means?
Yes, it means you can't engage
So you don't know...
"Republican propaganda"
Explain what your understanding of propaganda is.
You are the one who uses it.
So you don't know...
"I all ready answered that"
Right. As in "already answered."
No, as in "I don't want to engage"
Idiot. More reinventing of definitions?
"If you are too lazy to look it up"
You are lazy. Look it up - moron. It isn't my job to teach you the
basics.
Again, another attempt to not engage
Get an education from someone else.
bla bla bla...nothing but nonsense.
What you view as nonsense is EVERYONE'S refusal to repeatedly tell you
the same things.
and beat you to a pulp so many times it got boring.
You NEVER offered a resonable reply. Instead, you simply lied. As
you
are doing now.
I am ready, willing, prepared, right here. Any day David, you wish to
be a
man and face me.
Lies
Where is the lie? I am here
I already told you this.
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
OK-
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation of
David Barnes?
No
Glad to see you back down.
Not backing down at all. I didn't say that.
OK
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at some
point in time?
I said you did some time
Great - PROVE IT. (or run...)
I have, time and time again. You served time
You are serving time right now
You work a 8 hour day, you served 8 hours
So prove it. I thought you said you wanted to "engage me?"
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
no
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
I have told you, google
What is the url?
Go to google, do some searches
I did. Nothing...
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect from
those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you "beat"
people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is true -
we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no honor,
no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
I doubt it. You were challenged... And you "ran."
Nope,
I never did a investigation on you
I know. I never said you did. You did.
Nope, wrong again, I didn't say that.
Of course you did. But I'm glad to see the fear of prosecution has
made you change your ways. I doubt it will help, though. Ask your
"prosecutor friend."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 04:50:03 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031443281607%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <IaWdnbGAldKDynaiRVn-hQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031311167737%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <z82dnUEHt5hhonaiRVn-uQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031148289631%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <vuWdnaQxwcgvjnaiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23,
2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges",
little
boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge
for a
reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I
challenge
can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like
you
just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you
are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you didn't
know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
No you don't.
I don't?
Please show me the law that says I don't have a right to challenge
you.
Since when does the law mean anything to you?
You have the right to offer your opinion.
I have a right to challenge you
Stop repeating your mistakes... Child.
Stop acting
as though when you "challenge" someone it means something when
they
ignore you. All it means is you offer nothing to the
conversation.
This is all a diversion attempt to distract off the issue
You know better than I what your motivations are...
You will not engage because if you engaged I would embarrass you in
front of
everyone by showing you can't defend your claims.
I have "engaged" you hundreds of time.
Never,
and it is so easy to prove.
All I have to do is just ask you to show the proof.
I made it my policy, long ago, that wasn't going to keep repeating the
arguments I offered you because you are too stupid to understand them.
What is to not understand?
I question
You run
Nothing to misunderstand about it.
I have tons of files on hand, that show your comments, your claims, your
lies, that you refuse to answer too.
Then sit there and read them I don't really care.
You have NEVER offered
anything. As YOU would say, you always "lose." LOL! Sorry - I got
bored with it. This is more fun - you are a Sunfish, not a Marlin.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James, and
Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
Challenge, run, coward - you are a joke.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
I mean what I said. NO ONE.
So?
You tell me. YOU replied.
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about
what
you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and the
others
on
the
challenge.
You are the most prolific liar on this newsgroup. Hands down.
You
beat NO ONE.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find
out.
I have "faced you"
You have never faced me. You are too scared.
You live in a dream world.
I have so many of your post saved that proves you come up with lame
excuses
like
"I am not going to get into this again"
RIGHT. Do you understand what the word "again" means?
Yes, it means you can't engage
So you don't know...
"Republican propaganda"
Explain what your understanding of propaganda is.
You are the one who uses it.
So you don't know...
"I all ready answered that"
Right. As in "already answered."
No, as in "I don't want to engage"
Idiot. More reinventing of definitions?
"If you are too lazy to look it up"
You are lazy. Look it up - moron. It isn't my job to teach you the
basics.
Again, another attempt to not engage
Get an education from someone else.
bla bla bla...nothing but nonsense.
What you view as nonsense is EVERYONE'S refusal to repeatedly tell you
the same things.
and beat you to a pulp so many times it got boring.
You NEVER offered a resonable reply. Instead, you simply lied.
As
you
are doing now.
I am ready, willing, prepared, right here. Any day David, you wish
to
be a
man and face me.
Lies
Where is the lie? I am here
I already told you this.
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
OK-
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation
of
David Barnes?
No
Glad to see you back down.
Not backing down at all. I didn't say that.
OK
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at
some
point in time?
I said you did some time
Great - PROVE IT. (or run...)
I have, time and time again. You served time
You are serving time right now
You work a 8 hour day, you served 8 hours
So prove it. I thought you said you wanted to "engage me?"
Whats to prove?
You serve time.
I have all ready proven it.
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation
you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read
your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the
State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away
from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
no
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
I have told you, google
What is the url?
Go to google, do some searches
I did. Nothing...
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect
from
those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing
the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you
"beat"
people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is
true -
we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no
honor,
no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for
some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
I doubt it. You were challenged... And you "ran."
Nope,
I never did a investigation on you
I know. I never said you did. You did.
Nope, wrong again, I didn't say that.
Of course you did.
No, I said I had done some research. Not once have I ever said that through
my duties I performed an investigation.
That was you who tried to make that up.
But I'm glad to see the fear of prosecution has
made you change your ways.
Oh yea, I was shaking.
I doubt it will help, though. Ask your
"prosecutor friend."
I did, he laughed, we both laughed.
And are still laughing..:o)
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 05:45:27 PM |
|
|
In article <ndmdnYweE6CP93aiRVn-sA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031443281607%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <IaWdnbGAldKDynaiRVn-hQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031311167737%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <z82dnUEHt5hhonaiRVn-uQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031148289631%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <vuWdnaQxwcgvjnaiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December 23,
2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges",
little
boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I challenge
for a
reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I
challenge
can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things like
you
just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child you
are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you didn't
know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
No you don't.
I don't?
Please show me the law that says I don't have a right to challenge
you.
Since when does the law mean anything to you?
You have the right to offer your opinion.
I have a right to challenge you
Stop repeating your mistakes... Child.
Stop acting
as though when you "challenge" someone it means something when
they
ignore you. All it means is you offer nothing to the
conversation.
This is all a diversion attempt to distract off the issue
You know better than I what your motivations are...
You will not engage because if you engaged I would embarrass you in
front of
everyone by showing you can't defend your claims.
I have "engaged" you hundreds of time.
Never,
and it is so easy to prove.
All I have to do is just ask you to show the proof.
I made it my policy, long ago, that wasn't going to keep repeating the
arguments I offered you because you are too stupid to understand them.
What is to not understand?
I question
You run
Nothing to misunderstand about it.
Since you don't understand I can see you feeling that way.
I have tons of files on hand, that show your comments, your claims, your
lies, that you refuse to answer too.
Then sit there and read them I don't really care.
You have NEVER offered
anything. As YOU would say, you always "lose." LOL! Sorry - I got
bored with it. This is more fun - you are a Sunfish, not a Marlin.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James, and
Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
Challenge, run, coward - you are a joke.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
I mean what I said. NO ONE.
So?
You tell me. YOU replied.
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking about
what
you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and the
others
on
the
challenge.
You are the most prolific liar on this newsgroup. Hands down.
You
beat NO ONE.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find
out.
I have "faced you"
You have never faced me. You are too scared.
You live in a dream world.
I have so many of your post saved that proves you come up with lame
excuses
like
"I am not going to get into this again"
RIGHT. Do you understand what the word "again" means?
Yes, it means you can't engage
So you don't know...
"Republican propaganda"
Explain what your understanding of propaganda is.
You are the one who uses it.
So you don't know...
"I all ready answered that"
Right. As in "already answered."
No, as in "I don't want to engage"
Idiot. More reinventing of definitions?
"If you are too lazy to look it up"
You are lazy. Look it up - moron. It isn't my job to teach you the
basics.
Again, another attempt to not engage
Get an education from someone else.
bla bla bla...nothing but nonsense.
What you view as nonsense is EVERYONE'S refusal to repeatedly tell you
the same things.
and beat you to a pulp so many times it got boring.
You NEVER offered a resonable reply. Instead, you simply lied.
As
you
are doing now.
I am ready, willing, prepared, right here. Any day David, you wish
to
be a
man and face me.
Lies
Where is the lie? I am here
I already told you this.
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
OK-
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an investigation
of
David Barnes?
No
Glad to see you back down.
Not backing down at all. I didn't say that.
OK
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated at
some
point in time?
I said you did some time
Great - PROVE IT. (or run...)
I have, time and time again. You served time
You are serving time right now
You work a 8 hour day, you served 8 hours
So prove it. I thought you said you wanted to "engage me?"
Whats to prove?
You serve time.
I have all ready proven it.
If you are afraid to "engage me," fine. Quit claiming it is otherwise.
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged investigation
you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to read
your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the
State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away
from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
no
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to have
concerning David Barnes?
I have told you, google
What is the url?
Go to google, do some searches
I did. Nothing...
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some respect
from
those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually discussing
the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you
"beat"
people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is
true -
we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no
honor,
no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for
some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
I doubt it. You were challenged... And you "ran."
Nope,
I never did a investigation on you
I know. I never said you did. You did.
Nope, wrong again, I didn't say that.
Of course you did.
No, I said I had done some research. Not once have I ever said that through
my duties I performed an investigation.
That was you who tried to make that up.
Squirm all you like. That won't get you off the hook.
But I'm glad to see the fear of prosecution has
made you change your ways.
Oh yea, I was shaking.
You should be. (Of course, you may not be smart enough to understand
the position you are in.)
I doubt it will help, though. Ask your
"prosecutor friend."
I did, he laughed, we both laughed.
And are still laughing..:o)
Some prosecutor. Same school of ethics as you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
25 Dec 2003 05:54:48 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031545274758%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <ndmdnYweE6CP93aiRVn-sA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031443281607%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <IaWdnbGAldKDynaiRVn-hQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031311167737%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <z82dnUEHt5hhonaiRVn-uQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220031148289631%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <vuWdnaQxwcgvjnaiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:251220030820109725%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <m9udnVM4XZdCd3ei4p2dnA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bse309$taf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
This challenge was presented to James Keegan December
23,
2003 at
10:43
A.M.
Nobody gives a ***** about your assinine "challenges",
little
boy.
Of course not Ray, because you can't beat me. I
challenge
for a
reason,
because I know I can win the challenge and the ones I
challenge
can't.
So naturally you and the others are going to say things
like
you
just
said
above..:o(
You moron. Your "challenges" make you look like the child
you
are.
That is what debates are about David Barnes, in case you
didn't
know.
You make claims, James made claims, Ray has made claims.
I have the right to challenge.
No you don't.
I don't?
Please show me the law that says I don't have a right to
challenge
you.
Since when does the law mean anything to you?
You have the right to offer your opinion.
I have a right to challenge you
Stop repeating your mistakes... Child.
Stop acting
as though when you "challenge" someone it means something when
they
ignore you. All it means is you offer nothing to the
conversation.
This is all a diversion attempt to distract off the issue
You know better than I what your motivations are...
You will not engage because if you engaged I would embarrass you
in
front of
everyone by showing you can't defend your claims.
I have "engaged" you hundreds of time.
Never,
and it is so easy to prove.
All I have to do is just ask you to show the proof.
I made it my policy, long ago, that wasn't going to keep repeating the
arguments I offered you because you are too stupid to understand them.
What is to not understand?
I question
You run
Nothing to misunderstand about it.
Since you don't understand I can see you feeling that way.
Explain it then. What is not to understand about I ask you a question and
you run?
I have tons of files on hand, that show your comments, your claims,
your
lies, that you refuse to answer too.
Then sit there and read them I don't really care.
You have NEVER offered
anything. As YOU would say, you always "lose." LOL! Sorry - I
got
bored with it. This is more fun - you are a Sunfish, not a
Marlin.
The ones looking like the child are people like you, James,
and
Ray.
Because once challenged you run.
Challenge, run, coward - you are a joke.
No
one takes you seriously and you know that.
You mean people like you? That make claims and run away?
Well that certainly doesn't surprise me.
I mean what I said. NO ONE.
So?
You tell me. YOU replied.
You "challenge" people
because you hope you can manipulate them into talking
about
what
you
want to talk about.
Not at all, I challenge because I know I can beat you and
the
others
on
the
challenge.
You are the most prolific liar on this newsgroup. Hands down.
You
beat NO ONE.
But being the coward you are, you will never face me to find
out.
I have "faced you"
You have never faced me. You are too scared.
You live in a dream world.
I have so many of your post saved that proves you come up with
lame
excuses
like
"I am not going to get into this again"
RIGHT. Do you understand what the word "again" means?
Yes, it means you can't engage
So you don't know...
"Republican propaganda"
Explain what your understanding of propaganda is.
You are the one who uses it.
So you don't know...
"I all ready answered that"
Right. As in "already answered."
No, as in "I don't want to engage"
Idiot. More reinventing of definitions?
"If you are too lazy to look it up"
You are lazy. Look it up - moron. It isn't my job to teach you
the
basics.
Again, another attempt to not engage
Get an education from someone else.
bla bla bla...nothing but nonsense.
What you view as nonsense is EVERYONE'S refusal to repeatedly tell
you
the same things.
and beat you to a pulp so many times it got boring.
You NEVER offered a resonable reply. Instead, you simply
lied.
As
you
are doing now.
I am ready, willing, prepared, right here. Any day David, you
wish
to
be a
man and face me.
Lies
Where is the lie? I am here
I already told you this.
That is how desperate you have become. You never
"beat" anyone. That is all in your mind.
Oh? Care to go at it?
OK-
1) Isn't it true that you claim to have conducted an
investigation
of
David Barnes?
No
Glad to see you back down.
Not backing down at all. I didn't say that.
OK
2) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes is a "convicted
criminal."
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
3) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes was incarcerated
at
some
point in time?
I said you did some time
Great - PROVE IT. (or run...)
I have, time and time again. You served time
You are serving time right now
You work a 8 hour day, you served 8 hours
So prove it. I thought you said you wanted to "engage me?"
Whats to prove?
You serve time.
I have all ready proven it.
If you are afraid to "engage me," fine. Quit claiming it is otherwise.
Do you even understand what I mean by serving time?
You are truly dense.
WE all serve time doing something, at some point.
Get it yet?
How much time do you serve on a case (in your case, imaginary ones)
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition
of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition
of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged
investigation
you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to
read
your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the
State
of
Delaware and that after an investigation of David Barnes you
discovered
that he is a convicted felon who is currently on parole and as
a
condition of this parole David Barnes is required to stay away
from
children and wear an ankle shackle?
no
7) What was the source of this information you now claim to
have
concerning David Barnes?
I have told you, google
What is the url?
Go to google, do some searches
I did. Nothing...
You are a desperate, immature, child who wants some
respect
from
those
you admire, so much. You can't get it by actually
discussing
the
issues, so you run around "challenging" and claiming you
"beat"
people,
or they "run away" or they are "cowards." None of that is
true -
we
just can't take a person like you seriously. You have no
honor,
no
integrity, no credibility, and no morality.
You are a sad, sad, little person. Perhaps it is time for
some
introspection on your part.
You really need some help..:o)
Thanks for your response, I was entertained.
I doubt it. You were challenged... And you "ran."
Nope,
I never did a investigation on you
I know. I never said you did. You did.
Nope, wrong again, I didn't say that.
Of course you did.
No, I said I had done some research. Not once have I ever said that
through
my duties I performed an investigation.
That was you who tried to make that up.
Squirm all you like. That won't get you off the hook.
Oooh, I am so scared.
But I'm glad to see the fear of prosecution has
made you change your ways.
Oh yea, I was shaking.
You should be. (Of course, you may not be smart enough to understand
the position you are in.)
Position I am in?
David, the moment you try something, I have a counter suit and a attorney
prepared. I have your comments, your accusations I am a child molester, and
many other comments that would destroy you in a court.
I am in no position, as you like to think.
I am in a position that can destroy you though.
I doubt it will help, though. Ask your
"prosecutor friend."
I did, he laughed, we both laughed.
And are still laughing..:o)
Some prosecutor. Same school of ethics as you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Update ON challenge to James Keegan |
26 Dec 2003 08:55:40 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message news:<F_adnUo8Z7ej5HaiRVn-gg@comcast.com>...
Do you even understand what I mean by serving time?
You are truly dense.
WE all serve time doing something, at some point.
Get it yet?
How much time do you serve on a case (in your case, imaginary ones)
So, you do admit that you claimed that D. Barnes has served time?
However, now you wish to try and ***** your way out of it? LOL!!!!
Sorry, this is the most pathetic excuse I've ever seen.
What about the part where you said he served time for molesting
children? How does that work into you little ***** excuse?
4) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition
of
parole,
is required to stay away from children?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
5) Isn't it true that you claim that while making this alleged
investigation you discovered that Mr. Barnes, as a condition
of
parole,
is required to wear an ankle shackle?
no
Glad to see you back down.
Read above
OK
6) Isn't it true that after conducting this alleged
investigation
you
went on a nation-wide newsgroup and told anyone willing to
read
your
claims, that you are a law enforcement officer working for the
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
