Science > Abortion > Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S.
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Mr. Young" |
| Date: |
06 Sep 2006 11:54:47 PM |
| Object: |
Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass. Of course, anything that is of
detriment to America becomes a cause for the ACLU to embrace so we shouldn't
expect 'relief' any time soon.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/18070.html
By Sher Zieve - Recent Susquehanna Polling and Research results found that
71% of Americans polled believe that illegal immigration poses a clear
threat to the US. The poll was commissioned by the Pittsburgh
Tribune-Review.
More than half (56%) of those polled said they are more aware of foreigners
today, than they were before 9/11/2001, and 31% said that they believe
illegal immigration's biggest threat is terrorism.
--
----------
Mr. J Yöung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "cor" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 01:29:00 AM |
|
|
"Mr. Young" wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 05:44:41 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:29:00 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <44FFBC2C.16E6F3A5@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Mr. Young" wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
They were here illegally?
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
.
|
|
|
| User: "cor" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 01:22:41 PM |
|
|
"Attila <" wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:29:00 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <44FFBC2C.16E6F3A5@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Mr. Young" wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
They were here illegally?
I am sure they jay walked or loitered somewhere, or worse, they even refused
to give their seat to a white bus rider. Fucking illegal I would say.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 03:06:08 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:22:41 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <45006371.76CF9543@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Attila <" wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:29:00 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <44FFBC2C.16E6F3A5@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Mr. Young" wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
They were here illegally?
I am sure they jay walked or loitered somewhere, or worse, they even refused
to give their seat to a white bus rider. Fucking illegal I would say.
That was not the question.
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
.
|
|
|
| User: "cor" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
08 Sep 2006 02:28:05 AM |
|
|
"Attila <" wrote:
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:22:41 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <45006371.76CF9543@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Attila <" wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:29:00 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <44FFBC2C.16E6F3A5@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Mr. Young" wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
They were here illegally?
I am sure they jay walked or loitered somewhere, or worse, they even refused
to give their seat to a white bus rider. Fucking illegal I would say.
That was not the question.
The question was the legality of a minority.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
08 Sep 2006 05:30:34 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:28:05 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <45011B85.89135B81@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Attila <" wrote:
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:22:41 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <45006371.76CF9543@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Attila <" wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:29:00 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <44FFBC2C.16E6F3A5@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Mr. Young" wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
They were here illegally?
I am sure they jay walked or loitered somewhere, or worse, they even refused
to give their seat to a white bus rider. Fucking illegal I would say.
That was not the question.
The question was the legality of a minority.
No it was not. The question was whether or not their presence in this
country was legal or not. Nothing else, including race or religion.
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
.
|
|
|
| User: "cor" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
08 Sep 2006 01:16:10 PM |
|
|
"Attila <" wrote:
....
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
They were here illegally?
I am sure they jay walked or loitered somewhere, or worse, they even refused
to give their seat to a white bus rider. Fucking illegal I would say.
That was not the question.
The question was the legality of a minority.
No it was not. The question was whether or not their presence in this
country was legal or not. Nothing else, including race or religion.
"to expell them en' mass"
Who is "them"
What does "en' mass" mean? Does it include non offenders too?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
08 Sep 2006 03:19:25 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:16:10 -0800, cor <cor@exchangenet.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <4501B36A.14C30EE0@exchangenet.net>
wrote:
"Attila <" wrote:
....
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
They were here illegally?
I am sure they jay walked or loitered somewhere, or worse, they even refused
to give their seat to a white bus rider. Fucking illegal I would say.
That was not the question.
The question was the legality of a minority.
No it was not. The question was whether or not their presence in this
country was legal or not. Nothing else, including race or religion.
"to expell them en' mass"
Who is "them"
All those in the US illegally.
What does "en' mass" mean?
All of them, without exception.
Does it include non offenders too?
If they are here legally they are not offenders are they?
But do not change any laws to make any of them legal.
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ChalkItUp" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
08 Sep 2006 02:40:35 PM |
|
|
cor wrote:
"Attila <" wrote:
....
Like Blacks dogs and jews during the 20-60's?
They were here illegally?
I am sure they jay walked or loitered somewhere, or worse, they even refused
to give their seat to a white bus rider. Fucking illegal I would say.
That was not the question.
The question was the legality of a minority.
No it was not. The question was whether or not their presence in this
country was legal or not. Nothing else, including race or religion.
"to expell them en' mass"
Who is "them"
Read the original post. The "them" refers to the "illegals" in the
subject line.
What does "en' mass" mean?
It means all of the "illegals" to whom the "them" refers.
Does it include non offenders too?
A "non offender illegal" is an oxymoron!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 08:32:03 AM |
|
|
Hypocrite wingnut "Mr. Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:F4KdnbcoeZLxO2LZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
So...should we put your continued ability to dump OT trolls on the above
cross-posted groups to a vote?
LC~ Expect nothing but crickets from the direction of hypocrite-boy.
"debating for the sake of debating is not my thing."
From: "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
Message-ID: <f-KdnaxYlvThslLeRVn-og@giganews.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 01:00:14 AM |
|
|
Mr. Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
(Adolf Hitler circa 1934)
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 05:44:08 AM |
|
|
On 07 Sep 2006 06:00:14 GMT, (Ray Fischer) in
alt.abortion with message-id
<44ffb56e$0$34487$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> wrote:
Mr. Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
(Adolf Hitler circa 1934)
What did Hitler say about illegal immigration? Not immigration but
*illegal* immigration.
Why is it so difficult to understand the difference?
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
.
|
|
|
| User: "DarkAngel" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 11:31:29 AM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
On 07 Sep 2006 06:00:14 GMT, (Ray Fischer) in
alt.abortion with message-id
<44ffb56e$0$34487$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> wrote:
Mr. Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
(Adolf Hitler circa 1934)
What did Hitler say about illegal immigration? Not immigration but
*illegal* immigration.
What's the difference? The illegal status of some forms of immigration
is determined by state authority, and the State is an illegitimate
authority.
It is infringement on the right of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness to restrict the movement of free individuals.
---
No Gods. No Masters.
"The Land can be owned by no one
because the Land is produced by no one"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 03:05:32 PM |
|
|
On 7 Sep 2006 09:31:29 -0700, "DarkAngel" <drkangel666@hotmail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1157646689.275960.323220@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 07 Sep 2006 06:00:14 GMT, (Ray Fischer) in
alt.abortion with message-id
<44ffb56e$0$34487$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> wrote:
Mr. Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
(Adolf Hitler circa 1934)
What did Hitler say about illegal immigration? Not immigration but
*illegal* immigration.
What's the difference?
A lot.
The illegal status of some forms of immigration
is determined by state authority,
No, Federal.
and the State is an illegitimate
authority.
No, it is not.
It is infringement on the right of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness to restrict the movement of free individuals.
Exactly where can this right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness be found? As a legal concept, enforced by law?
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
.
|
|
|
| User: "DarkAngel" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 04:09:26 PM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 09:31:29 -0700, "DarkAngel" <drkangel666@hotmail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1157646689.275960.323220@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
Exactly where can this right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness be found? As a legal concept, enforced by law?
Rights are not created or enforced by Law.
---
No Gods. No Masters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DarkAngel" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 04:24:59 PM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 09:31:29 -0700, "DarkAngel" <drkangel666@hotmail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1157646689.275960.323220@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
The illegal status of some forms of immigration
is determined by state authority,
No, Federal.
State authority as in 'the State', the social organism that is composed
of both a caste of professional decision-makers and a caste of
enforcers who are given a monopoly on the use of force in this society.
Not as in 'the states versus the federal government'.
and the State is an illegitimate
authority.
No, it is not.
Yes, it is. The authority of the State does not rest upon the will of
the people, but upon the so-called right of conquest, the use of
coercive force to impose its will. It is a betrayal of Reason.
---
No Gods. No Masters.
"Abolition of church and state is the precondition of liberty."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 11:38:22 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Mr. Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
(Adolf Hitler circa 1934)
Thanks for surrendering so completely :)
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of alt.atheism Posters Believe J Young is a moron |
07 Sep 2006 12:42:53 AM |
|
|
Mr. Young a =E9crit :
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
The fact alone that the vast majority of alt.atheism posters don't what
you here is justification enough to tell you to get lost.
Of course, anything that is of
detriment to America becomes a cause for the ACLU to embrace so we should=
n't
expect 'relief' any time soon.
How Christian of you. Why do you hate your country and what it stands
for so much?
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/18070.html
By Sher Zieve - Recent Susquehanna Polling and Research results found that
71% of Americans polled believe that illegal immigration poses a clear
threat to the US. The poll was commissioned by the Pittsburgh
Tribune-Review.
More than half (56%) of those polled said they are more aware of foreigne=
rs
today, than they were before 9/11/2001, and 31% said that they believe
illegal immigration's biggest threat is terrorism.
=20
=20
=20
=20
--=20
----------
=20
Mr. J Y=F6ung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 10:35:14 AM |
|
|
Mr. Young schreef:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass. Of course, anything that is of
detriment to America becomes a cause for the ACLU to embrace so we shouldn't
expect 'relief' any time soon.
And what if the majority does not want you;
Will you go?
By Sher Zieve - Recent Susquehanna Polling and Research results found that
71% of Americans polled believe that illegal immigration poses a clear
threat to the US. The poll was commissioned by the Pittsburgh
Tribune-Review.
More than half (56%) of those polled said they are more aware of foreigners
today, than they were before 9/11/2001, and 31% said that they believe
illegal immigration's biggest threat is terrorism.
And precisely how many of the 9/11 culprits were illigal immigrants?
(and how many came from Mexico?)
Think about it
Peter van Velzen
September 2006
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Bigots and their Number-Free Statistics |
07 Sep 2006 06:38:07 AM |
|
|
Mr. Young wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass.
That thar's just another number free statistic from the Bureau of Cowardice.
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bigots and their Number-Free Statistics |
07 Sep 2006 07:58:09 AM |
|
|
As viewed from alt.california, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Mr. Young wrote:
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them
here is justification enough to expell them en' mass.
That thar's just another number free statistic from the Bureau
of Cowardice.
No, but this here's just another outright lying post from Sanders
Kaufman. By posting under a new Subject line and effectively
retitling the thread, Kaufman attempted to isolate readers from
the post he was replying to, but his post's headers include
"In-Reply-To:
news:F4KdnbcoeZLxO2LZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews.com "
Going directly to that post (with most newsreaders, one can simply
double-click on the link), we can read that part which Kaufman
was extremely careful not to quote, mainly because it included a link
to the original article, mention of the name of the research company
that took the poll, the name of the newspaper that commissioned it,
and those very *numbers* that Kaufman claimed were missing from this
allegedly "number-free statistic". I've included below that part of
the post which Kaufman didn't want you to read.
<begin restored material from
news:F4KdnbcoeZLxO2LZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews.com >
www.theconservativevoice.com/article/18070.html
By Sher Zieve - Recent Susquehanna Polling and Research
results found that 71% of Americans polled believe that
illegal immigration poses a clear threat to the US. The
poll was commissioned by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
More than half (56%) of those polled said they are more
aware of foreigners today, than they were before 9/11/2001,
and 31% said that they believe illegal immigration's biggest
threat is terrorism.
<end restored material from
news:F4KdnbcoeZLxO2LZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews.com >
Now, it's fair to question the way a polling company chooses to
take a poll, it's fair to question their results, and it's fair
to question their possible bias. But what Kaufman did makes a
joke of his credibility; he flagrantly and demonstrably lied
about the content of the post he was replying to, and he changed
the Subject line to try to conceal that fact from readers.
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Bigots and their Number-Free Statistics |
07 Sep 2006 08:39:20 AM |
|
|
Jafo wrote:
Thank you for finally posting the actual numbers - and particularly for
posting the source.
In truth, you were not citing a poll at all. You were simply,
paraphrasing an article from a ultra-conservative propoganda magazine.
And that rag was, in turn, paraphrasing numbers from a Republican
telemarketing firm.
That's the kind of deep abstraction that you White Supremacists often
resort to in promoting your hate-based agendas.
Susquehanna is another one of those Republican-backed "pollsters"
ompanies, incorporated in 2000, to create polls that support ultra
white-wing agendas. While they have a side-business in conducting
unethical polls, their primary source of funding is in telemarketing.
+ - + + - + + - + + - +
I've actually worked with these freaks before.
They use very unethical practices - including wargame dialing and
unsolicited telemarketing calls.
They pay quite well - because that's what it takes to get the average
American worker to compromise his ethics.
---
It's no wonder you post anonymously.
Your'e a lying coward and would never post this crap under your own name.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bigots and their Number-Free Statistics |
07 Sep 2006 09:17:00 AM |
|
|
Again practicing a form of deception and doing it poorly,
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Jafo wrote:
Thank you for finally posting the actual numbers - and particularly
for posting the source.
"Finally"? The author of the original post in this thread did both;
he cited the actual numbers and gave a link to the source; you just
chose not to quote them when you changed the Subject line and made
your reply.
In truth, you were not citing a poll at all. You were simply,
paraphrasing an article from a ultra-conservative propoganda magazine.
And that rag was, in turn, paraphrasing numbers from a Republican
telemarketing firm.
I wouldn't know. According to the article the poll was commissioned
by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and apparently that's the firm they
chose to implement it.
That's the kind of deep abstraction that you White Supremacists often
resort to in promoting your hate-based agendas.
ROTFLMAO! It's over, Sanders, and your spin control only makes you
look silly. I notice that although you're responding to my post, you
didn't dare quote a word of it. Instead you're trying to dodge the
impact of your own words by calling me a "White Supremecist". You
reek of desperation.
Susquehanna is another one of those Republican-backed "pollsters"
ompanies, incorporated in 2000, to create polls that support ultra
white-wing agendas. While they have a side-business in conducting
unethical polls, their primary source of funding is in telemarketing.
Could be; I wouldn't know that either, Sanders. And I strongly
suspect that you don't know either, and that you're just trying to
smear the messenger. But either way, let's restore the comment I
made and that you were too terrified to quote:
Now, it's fair to question the way a polling company chooses to
take a poll, it's fair to question their results, and it's fair
to question their possible bias. But what Kaufman did makes a
joke of his credibility; he flagrantly and demonstrably lied
about the content of the post he was replying to, and he changed
the Subject line to try to conceal that fact from readers.
The only reason that I got into the thread was because the original
author did everything that you claimed he didn't do. He gave the
numbers and he gave the source. You selectively quoted a portion
of his post and were careful to omit the numbers and the source.
Don't take my word for it; read the original post for yourself.
On your own news server, it's
news:F4KdnbcoeZLxO2LZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews.com or in the Google
archives you'll find it at
http://groups.google.com/group/tx.politics/msg/22d13918f1c2388a?as_umsgid=F4KdnbcoeZLxO2LZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews.com
or for a shorter version, http://snipurl.com/w22j
I've actually worked with these freaks before.
They use very unethical practices - including wargame dialing and
unsolicited telemarketing calls.
Sanders Kaufman complaining about unethical practices after he's just
been exposed employing unethical practices. Now that's irony. :)
They pay quite well - because that's what it takes to get the average
American worker to compromise his ethics.
It's no wonder you post anonymously.
Your'e a lying coward and would never post this crap under your own name.
All I did, Sanders, was to expose and document your lying tactics.
I've no idea whether Susquehanna is a legitimate polling agency or
not, although it seems that the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review thinks so.
But that isn't the issue. You are the issue.
I've also no idea whether the thread's original author, "Mr. Young",
is a bigot or not, nor do I care, because he's not the issue. Again,
you are the issue.
You specifically stated that Young's post included no numbers and no
source, and you quoted only a portion of his article, conveniently
omitting that portion that put the lie to your asinine and easily
debunked claim.
You're a liar, Sanders. It's just that simple.
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Bigots and their Number-Free Statistics |
07 Sep 2006 11:00:17 AM |
|
|
Jafo wrote:
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
In truth, you were not citing a poll at all. You were simply,
paraphrasing an article from a ultra-conservative propoganda magazine.
And that rag was, in turn, paraphrasing numbers from a Republican
telemarketing firm.
I wouldn't know. According to the article the poll was commissioned
by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and apparently that's the firm they
chose to implement it.
Gosh - the link you posted cited the other polling agency as the source.
But it's no surprise that a bigot such as yourself would get confused
that way.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bigots and their Number-Free Statistics |
07 Sep 2006 11:41:20 AM |
|
|
As viewed from alt.california, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Jafo wrote:
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
In truth, you were not citing a poll at all. You were simply,
paraphrasing an article from a ultra-conservative propoganda magazine.
And that rag was, in turn, paraphrasing numbers from a Republican
telemarketing firm.
I wouldn't know. According to the article the poll was commissioned
by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and apparently that's the firm they
chose to implement it.
Gosh - the link you posted cited the other polling agency as the source.
Hey Sanders, here's a newsflash: People can read for themselves both
the original post *and* your denial of its content. Lying now won't
do you any good.
But it's no surprise that a bigot such as yourself would get confused
that way.
In news:uwTLg.16255$1f6.13611@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net you stated
quite clearly that no numbers or links were given in
news:F4KdnbcoeZLxO2LZnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@giganews.com
You lied.
If you were a normal person this would be End of Discussion, but
you'll continue to squeal like a buttfucked pig as you try to bend
the fabric of reality itself to deny that which was published.
Good luck, *****! :-D
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bigots and their Number-Free Statistics |
07 Sep 2006 02:55:52 PM |
|
|
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Jafo wrote:
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
In truth, you were not citing a poll at all. You were simply,
paraphrasing an article from a ultra-conservative propoganda
magazine. And that rag was, in turn, paraphrasing numbers from a
Republican telemarketing firm.
I wouldn't know. According to the article the poll was commissioned
by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and apparently that's the firm they
chose to implement it.
Gosh - the link you posted cited the other polling agency as the source.
But it's no surprise that a bigot such as yourself would get confused
that way.
Ah, the *IRONY* of you calling anyone a bigot, did you forget you said this?
"May GOD BLESS and keep the Wetback.
Now, getoff your ***** and go kill a Wetback
That way we'll all enjoy a double blessing -
one less illegal alien and one thrown away piece of white trash."
--
L'Chaim
Miriam
In the beginning
the Word already was.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Vast Majority of Citizens Believe Illegals Threat to U.S. |
07 Sep 2006 07:31:22 AM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and "Mr. Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com> posting the following on Thu, 7 Sep 2006
00:54:47 -0400 iin alt.atheism?
The fact alone that the majority of citizens don't want them here is
justification enough to expell them en' mass. Of course, anything that is of
detriment to America becomes a cause for the ACLU to embrace so we shouldn't
expect 'relief' any time soon.
Of course, Mr Uber-Christian here advocates something totally against
the ideals of Christianity.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
