| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
31 Aug 2007 02:20:13 AM |
| Object: |
Was it God's Fault |
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
sure.. you know how I get ugly and nasty when yuo strike up the truth...
i'm really mad that i have a ***** negro child, a dishonor to
the purto rican community. everyone know that my grandchild is a result of
raping a crack-***** daughter.. me guess You are going to blem God for
that one too.
.
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
31 Aug 2007 11:36:28 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:20:13 -0700, wrote
(in article <cb652a0d7cc4ba519ff7bae97e2c2948@remailer.metacolo.com>):
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
It was "part of God's plan."
--
While attacking Ray, Osprey says:
³So in other words Ray, you endorse women and men having sex,
irresponsibly...ie: not using protection, not planning, and you suggest that
women should abort.² - Osprey, Mar 23, 2002
On Apr 21, 2005 Osprey said:
³My first wife and I experienced an "unplanned" pregnancy."
And on Sep 25, 2005:
³So what's the big deal anyway? My wife and I were planning on having
another child, he came sooner..so what? ³
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
31 Aug 2007 11:52:58 PM |
|
|
On Sep 1, 12:36 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:20:13 -0700, wrote
(in article <cb652a0d7cc4ba519ff7bae97e2c2...@remailer.metacolo.com>):
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
It was "part of God's plan."
--
While attacking Ray, Osprey says:
=B3So in other words Ray, you endorse women and men having sex, =20
irresponsibly...ie: not using protection, not planning, and you suggest t=
hat =20
women should abort.=B2 - Osprey, Mar 23, 2002
On Apr 21, 2005 Osprey said:
=B3My first wife and I experienced an "unplanned" pregnancy."
And on Sep 25, 2005:
=B3So what's the big deal anyway? My wife and I were planning on having
another child, he came sooner..so what? =B3
Now, please explain who you are trying to impress.
First off, this topic has nothing to do with me at all. But yet, you
feel the need to try to mention me in almost every post. You
seriously have a problem.
Second, you aren't making any sense and you certainly don't have any
point in your rambling.
so please explain what your point is.
Or explain why that vacation you were forced to take, didn't help your
mental state of mind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
01 Sep 2007 01:44:18 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:52:58 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188622378.142809.218100@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 12:36 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:20:13 -0700, wrote
(in article <cb652a0d7cc4ba519ff7bae97e2c2...@remailer.metacolo.com>):
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
It was "part of God's plan."
--
While attacking Ray, Osprey says:
³So in other words Ray, you endorse women and men having sex,
irresponsibly...ie: not using protection, not planning, and you suggest
that
women should abort.² - Osprey, Mar 23, 2002
On Apr 21, 2005 Osprey said:
³My first wife and I experienced an "unplanned" pregnancy."
And on Sep 25, 2005:
³So what's the big deal anyway? My wife and I were planning on having
another child, he came sooner..so what? ³
Now, please explain who you are trying to impress.
First off, this topic has nothing to do with me at all. But yet, you
feel the need to try to mention me in almost every post. You
seriously have a problem.
Second, you aren't making any sense and you certainly don't have any
point in your rambling.
so please explain what your point is.
Or explain why that vacation you were forced to take, didn't help your
mental state of mind.
Vacation? I wish. You should write science fiction - you have a hell of an
imagination.
--
Osprey inadvertently admits to being sexually aroused by young girls.
³We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revealing tight
tops and that isnıt distractive, but itıs a distraction if a girl has the
confederate flag on her purse?³
- A comment made by Robert ³Osprey² Heishman in which he accidentally admits
to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops while
arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol. (January 10, 2006)
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
01 Sep 2007 04:43:51 AM |
|
|
On Sep 1, 2:44 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:52:58 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188622378.142809.218...@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 12:36 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:20:13 -0700, wrote
(in article <cb652a0d7cc4ba519ff7bae97e2c2...@remailer.metacolo.com>):
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
It was "part of God's plan."
--
While attacking Ray, Osprey says:
=B3So in other words Ray, you endorse women and men having sex, =20
irresponsibly...ie: not using protection, not planning, and you suggest
that =20
women should abort.=B2 - Osprey, Mar 23, 2002
On Apr 21, 2005 Osprey said:
=B3My first wife and I experienced an "unplanned" pregnancy."
And on Sep 25, 2005:
=B3So what's the big deal anyway? My wife and I were planning on havi=
ng
another child, he came sooner..so what? =B3
Now, please explain who you are trying to impress.
First off, this topic has nothing to do with me at all. But yet, you
feel the need to try to mention me in almost every post. You
seriously have a problem.
Second, you aren't making any sense and you certainly don't have any
point in your rambling.
so please explain what your point is.
Or explain why that vacation you were forced to take, didn't help your
mental state of mind.
Vacation? I wish. You should write science fiction - you have a hell of=
an
imagination.
--
Osprey inadvertently admits to being sexually aroused by young girls.
=B3We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revealing =
tight
tops and that isn=B9t distractive, but it=B9s a distraction if a girl has=
the
confederate flag on her purse?=B3
- A comment made by Robert =B3Osprey=B2 Heishman in which he accidentall=
y admits
to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops while
arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol. (January 10, 20=
06)
--- Hide quoted text -
Problem with your little statement up there.
Nowhere is there any such admittance, only your distortion and
willingness to lie.
Nobody is buying into your crap, haven't you noticed by now?
This is one reason you ran off and left for so long, last time you
were in here other readers started really bashing on you for this
crap. You do it every time, you come in..list lie after lie, then go
away when others start to come down on you for it.
You'll do it again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
01 Sep 2007 10:38:51 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 02:43:51 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188639831.248629.231420@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 2:44 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:52:58 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188622378.142809.218...@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 12:36 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:20:13 -0700, wrote
(in article <cb652a0d7cc4ba519ff7bae97e2c2...@remailer.metacolo.com>):
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
It was "part of God's plan."
--
While attacking Ray, Osprey says:
³So in other words Ray, you endorse women and men having sex,
irresponsibly...ie: not using protection, not planning, and you suggest
that
women should abort.² - Osprey, Mar 23, 2002
On Apr 21, 2005 Osprey said:
³My first wife and I experienced an "unplanned" pregnancy."
And on Sep 25, 2005:
³So what's the big deal anyway? My wife and I were planning on having
another child, he came sooner..so what? ³
Now, please explain who you are trying to impress.
First off, this topic has nothing to do with me at all. But yet, you
feel the need to try to mention me in almost every post. You
seriously have a problem.
Second, you aren't making any sense and you certainly don't have any
point in your rambling.
so please explain what your point is.
Or explain why that vacation you were forced to take, didn't help your
mental state of mind.
Vacation? I wish. You should write science fiction - you have a hell of an
imagination.
--
Osprey inadvertently admits to being sexually aroused by young girls.
³We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revealing tight
tops and that isnıt distractive, but itıs a distraction if a girl has the
confederate flag on her purse?³
- A comment made by Robert ³Osprey² Heishman in which he accidentally
admits
to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops while
arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol. (January 10, 2006)
--- Hide quoted text -
Problem with your little statement up there.
Nowhere is there any such admittance, only your distortion and
willingness to lie.
Of course there is. You admit that "Girls in schools in short mini skirts
and revealing tight tops" cause you "distraction." Do you really think that
if you come across as stupid that is better than being seen as perverted?
Nobody is buying into your crap, haven't you noticed by now?
Gee - no. I haven't "noticed." I guess you see things the rest of us
cannot.
This is one reason you ran off and left for so long, last time you
were in here other readers started really bashing on you for this
crap.
Then you should be able to prove that.
You do it every time, you come in..list lie after lie, then go
away when others start to come down on you for it.
What a fantasy world you live in. Is this how you convince yourself that
your family loves you, that you are respected at your guard job, that you
arenıt leeching off the government, that being a ³Guard Trainer² is a
promotion, that you ³serve your community by playing on the Internet,² etc.?
You'll do it again.
--
³We did not plan on having another child so soon, but guess what...things
happen. We accepted it.³ - Osprey, Sun, Jan 16 2005
Now if Osprey and his second wife (according to Osprey, his first wife hired
a ³hit man² to ³butcher² her child) had ³wanted² this child they would have
³planned it.² They didnıt, ergo, it was unwanted.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
01 Sep 2007 01:15:30 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@barnesco.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C2FED59B006DF311B022094F@news-server.san.rr.com...
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 02:43:51 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188639831.248629.231420@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 2:44 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:52:58 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188622378.142809.218...@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 12:36 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:20:13 -0700, wrote
(in article <cb652a0d7cc4ba519ff7bae97e2c2...@remailer.metacolo.com>):
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
It was "part of God's plan."
--
While attacking Ray, Osprey says:
³So in other words Ray, you endorse women and men having sex,
irresponsibly...ie: not using protection, not planning, and you
suggest
that
women should abort.² - Osprey, Mar 23, 2002
On Apr 21, 2005 Osprey said:
³My first wife and I experienced an "unplanned" pregnancy."
And on Sep 25, 2005:
³So what's the big deal anyway? My wife and I were planning on having
another child, he came sooner..so what? ³
Now, please explain who you are trying to impress.
First off, this topic has nothing to do with me at all. But yet, you
feel the need to try to mention me in almost every post. You
seriously have a problem.
Second, you aren't making any sense and you certainly don't have any
point in your rambling.
so please explain what your point is.
Or explain why that vacation you were forced to take, didn't help your
mental state of mind.
Vacation? I wish. You should write science fiction - you have a hell
of an
imagination.
--
Osprey inadvertently admits to being sexually aroused by young girls.
³We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revealing
tight
tops and that isnıt distractive, but itıs a distraction if a girl has
the
confederate flag on her purse?³
- A comment made by Robert ³Osprey² Heishman in which he accidentally
admits
to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops while
arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol. (January 10,
2006)
--- Hide quoted text -
Problem with your little statement up there.
Nowhere is there any such admittance, only your distortion and
willingness to lie.
Of course there is.
Nope, only in your warped mind.
You admit that "Girls in schools in short mini skirts
and revealing tight tops" cause you "distraction."
No, I never said it caused "me" a distraction.
Do you really think that
if you come across as stupid that is better than being seen as perverted?
Do you really think anyone is buying into your *****?
Well, Keegan and Gwen will.
Nobody is buying into your crap, haven't you noticed by now?
Gee - no. I haven't "noticed."
There is a reason, it's because intelligent readers know you're full of
*****.
I guess you see things the rest of us
cannot.
This is one reason you ran off and left for so long, last time you
were in here other readers started really bashing on you for this
crap.
Then you should be able to prove that.
I have already done that.
You do it every time, you come in..list lie after lie, then go
away when others start to come down on you for it.
What a fantasy world you live in. Is this how you convince yourself that
your family loves you, that you are respected at your guard job, that you
arenıt leeching off the government, that being a ³Guard Trainer² is a
promotion, that you ³serve your community by playing on the Internet,²
etc.?
You are in no position to make those guesses..:o)
You'll do it again.
--
³We did not plan on having another child so soon, but guess what...things
happen. We accepted it.³ - Osprey, Sun, Jan 16 2005
Now if Osprey and his second wife (according to Osprey, his first wife
hired
a ³hit man² to ³butcher² her child) had ³wanted² this child they would
have
³planned it.² They didnıt, ergo, it was unwanted.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
01 Sep 2007 02:17:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:15:30 -0700, Osprey wrote
(in article <4oWdnbeJ9rbeMUTbnZ2dnUVZ_oGjnZ2d@comcast.com>):
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@barnesco.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C2FED59B006DF311B022094F@news-server.san.rr.com...
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 02:43:51 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188639831.248629.231420@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 2:44 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:52:58 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188622378.142809.218...@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 12:36 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:20:13 -0700, wrote
(in article <cb652a0d7cc4ba519ff7bae97e2c2...@remailer.metacolo.com>):
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
It was "part of God's plan."
--
While attacking Ray, Osprey says:
³So in other words Ray, you endorse women and men having sex,
irresponsibly...ie: not using protection, not planning, and you
suggest
that
women should abort.² - Osprey, Mar 23, 2002
On Apr 21, 2005 Osprey said:
³My first wife and I experienced an "unplanned" pregnancy."
And on Sep 25, 2005:
³So what's the big deal anyway? My wife and I were planning on having
another child, he came sooner..so what? ³
Now, please explain who you are trying to impress.
First off, this topic has nothing to do with me at all. But yet, you
feel the need to try to mention me in almost every post. You
seriously have a problem.
Second, you aren't making any sense and you certainly don't have any
point in your rambling.
so please explain what your point is.
Or explain why that vacation you were forced to take, didn't help your
mental state of mind.
Vacation? I wish. You should write science fiction - you have a hell
of an
imagination.
--
Osprey inadvertently admits to being sexually aroused by young girls.
³We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revealing
tight
tops and that isnıt distractive, but itıs a distraction if a girl has
the
confederate flag on her purse?³
- A comment made by Robert ³Osprey² Heishman in which he accidentally
admits
to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops while
arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol. (January 10,
2006)
--- Hide quoted text -
Problem with your little statement up there.
Nowhere is there any such admittance, only your distortion and
willingness to lie.
Of course there is.
Nope, only in your warped mind.
You admit that "Girls in schools in short mini skirts
and revealing tight tops" cause you "distraction."
No, I never said it caused "me" a distraction.
So who were you speaking for that day?
Do you really think that
if you come across as stupid that is better than being seen as perverted?
Do you really think anyone is buying into your *****?
Well, Keegan and Gwen will.
And that bothers you.
Nobody is buying into your crap, haven't you noticed by now?
Gee - no. I haven't "noticed."
There is a reason, it's because intelligent readers know you're full of
*****.
That is like you speaking for Martians.
I guess you see things the rest of us
cannot.
This is one reason you ran off and left for so long, last time you
were in here other readers started really bashing on you for this
crap.
Then you should be able to prove that.
I have already done that.
So you can't.
You do it every time, you come in..list lie after lie, then go
away when others start to come down on you for it.
What a fantasy world you live in. Is this how you convince yourself that
your family loves you, that you are respected at your guard job, that you
arenıt leeching off the government, that being a ³Guard Trainer² is a
promotion, that you ³serve your community by playing on the Internet,²
etc.?
You are in no position to make those guesses..:o)
They are based on comments from your "friends."
--
Osprey inadvertently admits, on 2/3/2006:
³I was offered a position with Border Patrol about a year and a half ago.
My wife and I both like it here in Delaware though.³
As we all know, the Bush White House states that we are at ³war² and
terrorism needs to be curtailed at the borders. Part of his ³war on
terrorism² is to increase security at the borders by hiring more border
patrol.
The United State Government comes to Osprey and asks him if he will serve his
country and help protect our homeland from terrorism. Ospreyıs answer, ³No.
My comfort is more important than my country.²
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
01 Sep 2007 11:52:11 PM |
|
|
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:15:30 -0700, Osprey wrote
(in article <4oWdnbeJ9rbeMUTbnZ2dnUVZ_oGjn...@comcast.com>):
"David W. Barnes" <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C2FED59B006DF311B022094F@news-server.san.rr.com...
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 02:43:51 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188639831.248629.231...@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 2:44 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:52:58 -0700, osprey wrote
(in article <1188622378.142809.218...@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>):
On Sep 1, 12:36 am, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:20:13 -0700, wrote
(in article <cb652a0d7cc4ba519ff7bae97e2c2...@remailer.metacolo.co=
m>):
Was it God's Fault that Norma allowed her daughter to
be sodomized from her husband?
It was "part of God's plan."
--
While attacking Ray, Osprey says:
=B3So in other words Ray, you endorse women and men having sex,
irresponsibly...ie: not using protection, not planning, and you
suggest
that
women should abort.=B2 - Osprey, Mar 23, 2002
On Apr 21, 2005 Osprey said:
=B3My first wife and I experienced an "unplanned" pregnancy."
And on Sep 25, 2005:
=B3So what's the big deal anyway? My wife and I were planning on =
having
another child, he came sooner..so what? =B3
Now, please explain who you are trying to impress.
First off, this topic has nothing to do with me at all. But yet, y=
ou
feel the need to try to mention me in almost every post. You
seriously have a problem.
Second, you aren't making any sense and you certainly don't have any
point in your rambling.
so please explain what your point is.
Or explain why that vacation you were forced to take, didn't help y=
our
mental state of mind.
Vacation? I wish. You should write science fiction - you have a he=
ll
of an
imagination.
--
Osprey inadvertently admits to being sexually aroused by young girls.
=B3We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revea=
ling
tight
tops and that isn=B9t distractive, but it=B9s a distraction if a gir=
l has
the
confederate flag on her purse?=B3
- A comment made by Robert =B3Osprey=B2 Heishman in which he accide=
ntally
admits
to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops whi=
le
arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol. (January 1=
0,
2006)
--- Hide quoted text -
Problem with your little statement up there.
Nowhere is there any such admittance, only your distortion and
willingness to lie.
Of course there is.
Nope, only in your warped mind.
You admit that "Girls in schools in short mini skirts
and revealing tight tops" cause you "distraction."
No, I never said it caused "me" a distraction.
So who were you speaking for that day?
Do you really think that
if you come across as stupid that is better than being seen as pervert=
ed?
Do you really think anyone is buying into your *****?
Well, Keegan and Gwen will.
And that bothers you.
Nobody is buying into your crap, haven't you noticed by now?
Gee - no. I haven't "noticed."
There is a reason, it's because intelligent readers know you're full of
*****.
That is like you speaking for Martians. =20
I guess you see things the rest of us
cannot.
This is one reason you ran off and left for so long, last time you
were in here other readers started really bashing on you for this
crap.
Then you should be able to prove that.
I have already done that.
So you can't.
You do it every time, you come in..list lie after lie, then go
away when others start to come down on you for it.
What a fantasy world you live in. Is this how you convince yourself t=
hat
your family loves you, that you are respected at your guard job, that =
you
aren=B9t leeching off the government, that being a =B3Guard Trainer=B2=
is a
promotion, that you =B3serve your community by playing on the Internet=
,=B2
etc.?
You are in no position to make those guesses..:o)
They are based on comments from your "friends."
That's a lie as well, just like the lie you tried to pull off
yesterday with a made up "e-mail".
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
I challenge ANYONE in this newsgroup to show me where Barnes every
supported his claims that co-workers e-mailed him and the e-mail he
tried to pass off as mine, is authentic.
If anyone can do this, actually prove his claims to be true, I shall
leave the newsgroup forever.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 05:34:17 PM |
|
|
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 05:53:26 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
If you can prove that Barnes was e-mailed by any co-worker and can back up
his claims...I shall leave this newsgroup forever.
If you can't, and want to accept my challenge, you leave forever.
Can you accept those terms?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 09:00:40 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 6 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 09:05:42 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
Hey reason to abort poster-child,
I see you are still going on with your obsession as well.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word, because not one of
you has EVER accepted a challenge presented to me.
So until you can stand up, be a man and accept a challenge...and then if I
don't stay true to my word, you have nothing more to say.
I really got you idiots in an uproar tonight..:o)
NY Times must have really gotten a hold of Keegan.
You're just jealous because you're not the center of attention at this time.
Barnes is going to fall right into the pattern I said he would.
Fischer high-tailed it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
03 Sep 2007 12:13:53 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
Hey reason to abort poster-child,
....who's a pro-choice parent and grandparent.
I see you are still going on with your obsession as well.
Your vision is defective, as usual.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word, because not one of
you has EVER accepted a challenge presented to me.
That's because you're a patent fraud when it comes to your "challenges".
So until you can stand up, be a man and accept a challenge...and then if I
don't stay true to my word, you have nothing more to say.
You don't decide that, Prison Clerk.
I really got you idiots in an uproar tonight..:o)
NY Times must have really gotten a hold of Keegan.
More likely, you're just making it up as you have a few times before.
You're just jealous because you're not the center of attention at this time.
You have to have a mind before you can pretend to read someone else's, son.
Barnes is going to fall right into the pattern I said he would.
Fischer high-tailed it.
Keep patting yourself on the back, even though you keep breaking your arms.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 6 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 10:37:59 PM |
|
|
In article <Lf2dnYAlgKxq9kbbnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word
was that a joke?
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
03 Sep 2007 12:16:00 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> writes:
In article <Lf2dnYAlgKxq9kbbnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word
was that a joke?
It's what passes for reality in the world he spends an average of about 1440
minutes in the average day...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 6 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 09:24:46 PM |
|
|
Osprey wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
Hey reason to abort poster-child,
I see you are still going on with your obsession as well.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word, because not one
of you has EVER accepted a challenge presented to me.
So until you can stand up, be a man and accept a challenge...and then if
I don't stay true to my word, you have nothing more to say.
I really got you idiots in an uproar tonight..:o)
NY Times must have really gotten a hold of Keegan.
You're just jealous because you're not the center of attention at this
time.
Barnes is going to fall right into the pattern I said he would.
Fischer high-tailed it.
And I made you admit to being a liar. Looks like
you're on the wrong end.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 09:29:03 PM |
|
|
"IAAH" <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in message
news:vridnS41SND27UbbnZ2dnUVZ_uninZ2d@giganews.com...
Osprey wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
Hey reason to abort poster-child,
I see you are still going on with your obsession as well.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word, because not one
of you has EVER accepted a challenge presented to me.
So until you can stand up, be a man and accept a challenge...and then if
I don't stay true to my word, you have nothing more to say.
I really got you idiots in an uproar tonight..:o)
NY Times must have really gotten a hold of Keegan.
You're just jealous because you're not the center of attention at this
time.
Barnes is going to fall right into the pattern I said he would.
Fischer high-tailed it.
And I made you admit to being a liar.
Nope, I never admitted to being a liar.
Did I make a mistake in identity? Sure, that's possible.
Would a mistake in identity make it a lie? Nope, it's simply a mistake..if
it was a mistake at all.
You never made me admit to anything, period.
However, let me ask you a question (we all know you are notorious for
avoiding questions so it's expected you will not answer)
Have you "ever" lied in your life?
Looks like
you're on the wrong end.
Looks like you lied.
I will see if you can muster up just a little courage and answer my
question.
Have you EVER lied in your life?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 10:38:59 PM |
|
|
In article <K_mdnSLGnNLt7EbbnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"IAAH" <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in message
news:vridnS41SND27UbbnZ2dnUVZ_uninZ2d@giganews.com...
And I made you admit to being a liar.
Nope, I never admitted to being a liar.
you as much as admitted you were the target of legal action.
you admitted you lied about the new york times, several times.
you admitted you lied about your military service.
you admitted you lied about patrick.
you admitted you lied about Mimi.
you admitted you lied about david barnes
you admitted you lied about adam.
you've been reprimanded, haven't you?
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
03 Sep 2007 12:09:15 AM |
|
|
On Sep 2, 11:38 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <K_mdnSLGnNLt7EbbnZ2dnUVZ_hCdn...@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"IAAH" <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote in message
news:vridnS41SND27UbbnZ2dnUVZ_uninZ2d@giganews.com...
And I made you admit to being a liar.
Nope, I never admitted to being a liar.
you as much as admitted you were the target of legal action.
I seen where you are admitting that you are the target of legal
action. Did the NY Times really come after you that hard?
you admitted you lied about the new york times, several times.
I see you are absolutely scared now of what the New York Times is
probably getting prepared to do to you.
you admitted you lied about your military service.
I served, did you?
you admitted you lied about patrick.
You're really trying to reach out, take note you have failed to show
evidence for anything you have said.
you admitted you lied about Mimi.
Yawn...still...no evidence.
you admitted you lied about david barnes
Yawn...still...no evidence.
you admitted you lied about adam.
Yawn...still...no evidence.
you've been reprimanded, haven't you?
I see you have...how bad did they get you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
03 Sep 2007 03:47:41 AM |
|
|
In article <1188796155.834980.235740@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 2, 11:38 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <K_mdnSLGnNLt7EbbnZ2dnUVZ_hCdn...@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"IAAH" <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote in message
news:vridnS41SND27UbbnZ2dnUVZ_uninZ2d@giganews.com...
And I made you admit to being a liar.
Nope, I never admitted to being a liar.
you as much as admitted you were the target of legal action.
I seen where you are admitting that you are the target of legal
action.
you already admitted that false claim of yours was a lie.
you admitted you lied about the new york times, several times.
you admitted you lied about your military service.
you admitted you lied about patrick.
you admitted you lied about Mimi.
you admitted you lied about david barnes
you admitted you lied about adam.
you've been reprimanded, haven't you?
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 09:40:44 PM |
|
|
Osprey wrote:
"IAAH" <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in message
news:vridnS41SND27UbbnZ2dnUVZ_uninZ2d@giganews.com...
Osprey wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
Hey reason to abort poster-child,
I see you are still going on with your obsession as well.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word, because not
one of you has EVER accepted a challenge presented to me.
So until you can stand up, be a man and accept a challenge...and then
if I don't stay true to my word, you have nothing more to say.
I really got you idiots in an uproar tonight..:o)
NY Times must have really gotten a hold of Keegan.
You're just jealous because you're not the center of attention at
this time.
Barnes is going to fall right into the pattern I said he would.
Fischer high-tailed it.
And I made you admit to being a liar.
Nope, I never admitted to being a liar.
Yes, you have. One or the other of your statements
about my identity is a lie. There is no other
alternative.
The lie is there. The only question is which
statement was the lie you were telling.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
03 Sep 2007 12:07:12 AM |
|
|
On Sep 2, 10:40 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Osprey wrote:
"IAAH" <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote in message
news:vridnS41SND27UbbnZ2dnUVZ_uninZ2d@giganews.com...
Osprey wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patr...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264...@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
Hey reason to abort poster-child,
I see you are still going on with your obsession as well.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word, because not
one of you has EVER accepted a challenge presented to me.
So until you can stand up, be a man and accept a challenge...and then
if I don't stay true to my word, you have nothing more to say.
I really got you idiots in an uproar tonight..:o)
NY Times must have really gotten a hold of Keegan.
You're just jealous because you're not the center of attention at
this time.
Barnes is going to fall right into the pattern I said he would.
Fischer high-tailed it.
And I made you admit to being a liar.
Nope, I never admitted to being a liar.
Yes, you have.
No, I did not.
I also asked you a question, and I predicted you would avoid answering
it due to the fact that you are a coward and you are afraid to answer
questions.
Thanks for proving me, once again, accurate on my description of your
behavior.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
03 Sep 2007 03:48:17 AM |
|
|
In article <1188796032.914226.271280@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 2, 10:40 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Osprey wrote:
And I made you admit to being a liar.
Nope, I never admitted to being a liar.
Yes, you have.
No, I did not.
you as much as admitted you were the target of legal action.
you admitted you lied about the new york times, several times.
you admitted you lied about your military service.
you admitted you lied about patrick.
you admitted you lied about Mimi.
you admitted you lied about david barnes
you admitted you lied about adam.
you've been reprimanded, haven't you?
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
03 Sep 2007 10:15:01 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
On Sep 2, 10:40 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Osprey wrote:
"IAAH" <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote in message
news:vridnS41SND27UbbnZ2dnUVZ_uninZ2d@giganews.com...
Osprey wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patr...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbqckv77b.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264...@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
[the usual Prison Clerk garbage, starting to ramp up his BI]
No one's buying your latest fraud.
Hey reason to abort poster-child,
I see you are still going on with your obsession as well.
None of you can claim that I would not stick to my word, because not
one of you has EVER accepted a challenge presented to me.
So until you can stand up, be a man and accept a challenge...and then
if I don't stay true to my word, you have nothing more to say.
I really got you idiots in an uproar tonight..:o)
NY Times must have really gotten a hold of Keegan.
You're just jealous because you're not the center of attention at
this time.
Barnes is going to fall right into the pattern I said he would.
Fischer high-tailed it.
And I made you admit to being a liar.
Nope, I never admitted to being a liar.
Yes, you have.
No, I did not.
Yes, you have. Now, which statement was the lie?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Was it God's Fault |
02 Sep 2007 06:01:48 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:tPedna-3Mdl6o0bbnZ2dnUVZ_qiinZ2d@comcast.com...
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
If you can prove that Barnes was e-mailed by any co-worker and can back up
his claims...I shall leave this newsgroup forever.
I better make a correction, you idiots are dishonest.
Any co-worker that works with me.
That is, you must provide the e-mail, the proof with the headers, and you
must be able to back up his claims.
Want me to list them for you in case you decide not to be a punk and accept
this challenge?
Remember, Gwen claims she saw the proof. I can easily challenge her too,
and she will run away like you will.
If you can't, and want to accept my challenge, you leave forever.
Can you accept those terms?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: osprey's insanity on display |
02 Sep 2007 06:45:59 PM |
|
|
In article <-Jadnfo8EqNB3UbbnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:tPedna-3Mdl6o0bbnZ2dnUVZ_qiinZ2d@comcast.com...
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
If you can prove that Barnes
you can't support your own lies.
what type of insanity makes you challenge to to support another's
claim? are you afraid to challenge the person who make the claim?
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Keegans insanity on display |
02 Sep 2007 06:47:41 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-CD428B.19455902092007@individual.net...
In article <-Jadnfo8EqNB3UbbnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:tPedna-3Mdl6o0bbnZ2dnUVZ_qiinZ2d@comcast.com...
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
If you can prove that Barnes
you can't support your own lies.
Are you going to accept the challenge or not?
This is the final blow you could attempt to deliver and you could have me
gone from this newsgroup forever and have bragging rights.
Come on Keegan, accept or decline?
Decline is running.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: heishman's insanity on display |
02 Sep 2007 06:54:51 PM |
|
|
In article <zbednfEXCNsD1kbbnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-CD428B.19455902092007@individual.net...
In article <-Jadnfo8EqNB3UbbnZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:tPedna-3Mdl6o0bbnZ2dnUVZ_qiinZ2d@comcast.com...
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
If you can prove that Barnes
you can't support your own lies.
Are you going
no one can support your lies, coward heishman.
i see you ran away from my question too: "what type of insanity
makes you challenge to to support another's claim? are you afraid to
challenge the person who make the claim?"
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: osprey displays more insanity |
02 Sep 2007 06:45:10 PM |
|
|
In article <tPedna-3Mdl6o0bbnZ2dnUVZ_qiinZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
If you can prove that Barnes
you can't support your own lies.
what type of insanity makes you challenge to to support another's
claim? are you afraid to challenge the person who make the claim?
--
"New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
been warned."
-- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
in news:2rCdnZNy7LA5OojdRVn_iw@comcast.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Keegan is running |
02 Sep 2007 06:46:48 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-DECFE8.19451002092007@individual.net...
In article <tPedna-3Mdl6o0bbnZ2dnUVZ_qiinZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-66031B.18341702092007@individual.net...
In article <1188708731.926309.264620@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
On Sep 1, 3:17 pm, David W. Barnes <dbar...@barnesco.com> wrote:
Take note: Just like with your claim friends e-mailed you, you can't
and never have provided evidence to support it.
i suggest you pay more attention to *your* outstanding lies which
number in the hundreds. i also suggest you refrain from posting new
lies.
Challenge to Keegan.
If you can prove that Barnes
you can't support your own lies.
Can you accept the challenge or not?
Yes...or...No?
I'm going to punk each and everyone of you idiots out.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
