"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:e7ca63$8c4$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...

In article <4fto04F1kis7mU2@individual.net> "Steve O"
<stoboyle@hotmail.com> writes:

"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:e7c4qp$j5m$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>

"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150867489.369322.40060@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

youngopinions@aol.com schrieb:

This ban of 'purity rings' is not only an attack on Christianity,
but
morality and decency itself.

Do they have rings for girls who are still virgins but aren't averse to
the
odd ***** or two?
You know - the Catholic ones?

I'll try to find out for you.

But I think I need to know exactly what you would regard
as an "odd" *****.


-- cary

Actually , I don't think I've had an odd one.
I don't think that there is such a thing as a bad ***** either.
I mean, the most stupid question you could ask a man must be

" Please describe the worst ***** you've ever had?"

"Ummmm, nah! They were all good!"

"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:e7ca63$8c4$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...

In article <4fto04F1kis7mU2@individual.net> "Steve O"
<stoboyle@hotmail.com> writes:

"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:e7c4qp$j5m$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>

"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150867489.369322.40060@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

youngopinions@aol.com schrieb:

This ban of 'purity rings' is not only an attack on Christianity,
but
morality and decency itself.

Do they have rings for girls who are still virgins but aren't averse to
the
odd ***** or two?
You know - the Catholic ones?

I'll try to find out for you.

But I think I need to know exactly what you would regard
as an "odd" *****.


-- cary

Actually , I don't think I've had an odd one.
I don't think that there is such a thing as a bad ***** either.
I mean, the most stupid question you could ask a man must be

" Please describe the worst ***** you've ever had?"

"Ummmm, nah! They were all good!"

Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article <4fto04F1kis7mU2@individual.net> "Steve O" <stoboyle@hotmail.com> writes:

"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:e7c4qp$j5m$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>

"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150867489.369322.40060@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

youngopinions@aol.com schrieb:

This ban of 'purity rings' is not only an attack on Christianity, but
morality and decency itself.

Do they have rings for girls who are still virgins but aren't averse to the
odd ***** or two?
You know - the Catholic ones?

I'll try to find out for you.

But I think I need to know exactly what you would regard
as an "odd" *****.

Perhaps "occasional" *****?

Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article <4fto04F1kis7mU2@individual.net> "Steve O"
<stoboyle@hotmail.com> writes:

"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:e7c4qp$j5m$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>

"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150867489.369322.40060@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

youngopinions@aol.com schrieb:

This ban of 'purity rings' is not only an attack on Christianity,
but
morality and decency itself.

Do they have rings for girls who are still virgins but aren't averse to
the odd ***** or two?
You know - the Catholic ones?

I'll try to find out for you. But I think I need to know exactly what
you would regard
as an "odd" *****.

suck, not blow?

"Dysperdis" <dysperdis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Zeimg.72038$iF6.68310@pd7tw2no...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:jYfmg.71205$qd2.67534@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

"Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1150912286.827407.113570@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Johnny wrote:

"Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1150867771.705754.59720@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

youngopinions@aol.com wrote:

This ban of 'purity rings' is not only an attack on Christianity,

Look, bigot,

We see the bigots are those who against girls wearing purity rings in
this
story.

No, Jerky W.. The bigots are the ones trying to turn a dress code
violation into a attack.
Like you.

Well, banning them from wearing rings does seem quite ludicrous in a
way.
Unlike you I am not saying they can not wear these rings.
Do you care to show me the dress code that denies them wearing rings if
they allow earrrings?

How about the dress code at my work?

No sandals allowed I imagine, not sure though.

every little banning is not some "attack on christianity",
no matter how much you idiots yell.

So, why aren't you working to erase the bigotry that is shown by the
people
who banned these girls from wearing their purity rings?

Because, bigot,

You.

it is up to the school to deside proper dress.

Meaning they allow earrings while they state something about no jewelry
to be worn?
Care to justify their allowance of earrrings when they have a ban on
jewelry?

Stud earrings are much less likely to be dangerous than are rings. If
your ring gets caught on a piece of machinery, it can very easily break
your finger, or worse. If your stud earring gets close enough to get
caught, Very likely you were close enough to the machinery to cut your
ear already, regardless of the jewellery. We have the same restrictions
at my work, even though we are usually not working with machinery capable
of causing such damage.

Not
bigots like you.

A ban on jewelry would not allow even earrings to be worn.

A ban for safety reasons would take into account the fact that stud
earrings are much less of a safety risk than are rings. If you will
notice, stud earrings are the only type allowed, meaning that hoops, and
dangly earring are banned as well.

but
morality and decency itself. Christian women value their virtue and
use
these rings as an expression of chastity. Decency is an attribute
that
should be proudly put foward;

Shure is. So when do you plan on putting it forward?

When will you bigots stop banning girls from wearing purity rings?
I guess they will wear purity scarves next or bracelets.
Think they will go Muslim?

What's that got to do with this issue, bigot?

You are against the purity ring, which tells everyone just what you are
against, purity.
Bye, bigot.

They can wear their purity ring whenever they want, except for during
school where *all* rings are banned.

No problem, since the other students are required to remove their
bracelets in such areas.

Equal protection is the US way of doing it AFAIK.
Then comes the consideration of PE when someone accidentally is injured by
coming into contact with a stud earring or elsewhere even.

But, whatever the case, equal treatment seems to be the method to quell
the persecution cry you mention below.

I'm against crying "persecution!" where there is none.

Many don't see it that way though, especially in light of the other
exemptions and handling of stud earrings and bracelets.

What does that make me?

Unobservant?
Possibly a victim of tunnelvision?
Cutting down one type of tree from the whole forest?
Ineffective?
Draconian?
Hey, not trying to be hard on you there.
Don't take it too personally.
Just an observation that something better could be arranged for those
'Christians' you think are so unruly.