Gwyne=F0 Bennetdottir wrote:

On Dec 19, 3:08 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:

Gwyne=F0 Bennetdottir wrote:

"Your petty crusade," and your all-around "my whines supersede your
expressions, Yang," attitudes suck, royally. Your petty whines are
of the same ***** calibre as your attack on Yang for doing the right
thing. Yang's never lied about anybody, nor is Yang in the business
of silencing anybody with his information.

That's not the point.

It is the point.

Interesting. You seem to think you know what my points are better than I d=

The point is that he's cross-poster.

As are you. As am I. Check the "newsgroups" line to see exactly where
our differences are getting dumped.

Did I initiate the thread and include the cross-posts in order to incite?
No.

If he kept it to
alt.atheism, I wouldn't care a whit.

Personally, I don't mind if he sends his stuff through the alt. and
talk.abortion newsgroups (the newsgroups from which I post) - I'll
read it. It's relative material, considering alt.abortion is mostly
comprised of J Young's written turds and

Fine. That's your opinion.

It's my opinion that it reflects badly on
atheists.

for someone that thinks I am self-centered,

your continual
debasement of my opinion is laughable.

It demeans his message

No, it doesn't. Read the articles and cross-check them with other
sources, and you'll see, for the most part, his emotionality aside,
what he posts is Kosher.

As I've said what must be a hundred times,

I have no quarrel with the
message.

and it is
incendiary.

Yeah, so are news publications; so are JYoung's offensive O.T. and
prolific perversity; so is what most posters post.

Apparently, that makes it right.

I'm criticising you for your criticism of the importance his pieces
bring to the groups.

I never criticized anything of the sort. I criticized his
cross-posting.

What do you think he's cross-posting? Have you ever read any of the
links he's provided?

Did he have a link here? No. It was a deliberately incendiary message mean=

to rile Catholics.

It's no better than when J Young says that Nazis were
Darwinists.

If
you would for one moment read any of my posts and digest them for
one minute you would know that.

I've read a number of your posters.

Then how have you possibly come to the conclusion that I am criticising "t=

importance his pieces"?

The only one here being rude

Yes, I'm rude and you're rude. Lots of posters not related to our
pissing party are rude in other senses.

and abusive here is you.

I'm abusive to self-centered assholes; and IMO, you fit that
definition.

Your opinion seems to be be the only thing that is not in question here fo=

you while mine is worthless. What does that tell you?

these were the very same newsgroups
that Yang decided to troll.

Yang isn't trolling.

Oh, brother...amazing. What do you suppose his purpose is? To see if
Catholics think his joke is funny?

Regardless, our little conversation should have no interest
whatsoever to anyone and noe of our posts are written to
deliberately incite responses from Catholics and Canadians.

Yet - we're cross-posting to these groups, like they give a *****. (Or
maybe they do.)

Yet...this is the fundamental distinction. It's the intent.

Not many people
bother to remove newsgroups once they have been included by the OP.

Jesus, Gwyn, this is laughable.

I don't know a jesus, but at least you spelt my username properly.

"jesus"...it's an expression. In the future, I'll just say "***** it all".

You're arguments are completely half-baked
and more than a little hysterical.

That's my position. that you whining about something so trivial and
hypocritical is so laughable and amusing that I am unable to resist
responding to you.

LOL...you're accusing me of criticizing Yang for his message. False.

You're
accusing me of cross-posting

with identical motivations as the OP who was
flame-baiting. False. You're accusing me of making a mountain out of this
molehill of triviality

yet you decided to poke your nose in here

when your
silence would have been the more appropriate response.

The fact that he's an atheist an a liberal doesn't make
it any better.

I don't care if he was a theist and a conservative so long as he
doesn't lie.

Neither do I. As I've said before, it's not the message that's
offensive, it's the tactics i.e. cross-posting.

But you just cross-posted!

This is ridiculous.

Are you kidding that you can't draw a distinction
between the OP that deliberately included the newsgroups and a responder w=

doesn't bother to remove them? Get real!

I'm reading the information he posts - the articles, mainly. His
views of JYoung are no different from mine or anybody else's about
J Young and filth like him, but you aren't on a rampage about that.

How you come to that conclusion is anyone's guess. I oppose J Young's
message *as well* as his tactics...moreso even.

Yes - he's an offensive ***** and a real-life pedophile.
But you seem more concerned about Yang's trivial cross-posting

Sorry that you have that impression.

Let me assure you that it is completely
false.

I've posted *one* message criticizing Yang

and literally hundreds in
response to J Young's *****.

And don't go back to the
term "petty crusade". Being critical of a person is not impolite.

"petty crusade."

What he's doing is a service to others - not a "petty crusade." Bad
choice of words.

Again...this refers to his incendiary cross-posting,

not his message, though
I fail to see what professorial insights he intended with this post.