| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
06 Nov 2004 10:48:44 AM |
| Object: |
what if the exit polls were right? |
last tuesday around 4pm est, there were a lot of reports floating around that
kerry was winning big in all of the contested (swing) states. this chatter,
based on many exit polls, continued until the time when actual results were
released contradicting the early polls.
on wednesday, we heard several news/talk shows asking why the exit po0lls
were so far off in so many states.
what if the exit polls weren't off? what if they were accurate and something
else accounted for the vote differences? we've already heart rumors, and more
from ohio regarding advance voting and lost votes. similar sounds are coming
out of florida too.
a long time ago, there were rumors that the gop had staged a break-in. almost
everone ignored these rumors until, several months later, they became the
watergate scandal.
who knows what might emerge in the next few months?
.
|
|
| User: "Joe Sumbody" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 09:07:19 PM |
|
|
Every liberal wants to rule the world, the rest of us just want to be left
alone to live our lives as we see fit. So yes every Kerry supporter was
eager to get thier message out at the exit polls, but the rest of us people
that knew we were doing the right thing didnt need to advertise that fact or
try to justify our decisions, we just did what had to be done.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 10:52:02 PM |
|
|
Joe Sumbody <jerseyshur@hotmail.com> wrote:
Every liberal wants to rule the world,
Which explains why liberals generally strive for individual liberty
and conservatives try to force people to obey.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Resasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 11:10:13 AM |
|
|
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 11:23:41 AM |
|
|
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Hy7jd.48426$_g6.25114@okepread03...
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
Ditto.
Rules are rules.
People are sick of the complaining sects of the USA that complain about the
existing laws all the way back to Roe VS. Wade.
We need justice in the USA, not so many special interest, unfaithful
measures which produce less faith and more complaints.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 02:23:48 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Hy7jd.48426$_g6.25114@okepread03...
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
Ditto.
Rules are rules.
Funny how *that* doesn't apply to your whinefest against Duke Energy, eh?
People are sick of the complaining sects of the USA that complain about the
existing laws all the way back to Roe VS. Wade.
Really? I seem to have no trouble finding some who aren't happy about
Amendment XVI, which goes back a bit prior to 1973 (like about seven decades
prior).
We need justice in the USA, not so many special interest, unfaithful
measures which produce less faith and more complaints.
...unless, of course, it keeps you from getting what you claim is due you from
Duke Energy.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 02:28:04 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfcienfv.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Hy7jd.48426$_g6.25114@okepread03...
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
Ditto.
Rules are rules.
Funny how *that* doesn't apply to your whinefest against Duke Energy, eh?
It does apply. Why are you trying to sustain a lie?
You are attacking me because you KNOW if I keep alive and keep up my plight
for justice that I will eventually get it, and what does that mean for you?
Are you in league with the cruel liars and deceivers?
Your days are numbered, I hope you know that.
People are sick of the complaining sects of the USA that complain about
the
existing laws all the way back to Roe VS. Wade.
Really? I seem to have no trouble finding some who aren't happy about
Amendment XVI, which goes back a bit prior to 1973 (like about seven
decades
prior).
We need justice in the USA, not so many special interest, unfaithful
measures which produce less faith and more complaints.
..unless, of course, it keeps you from getting what you claim is due you
from
Duke Energy.
Wy canl;t you keep your mouth shut regarding my persoanl business?
How does my claim against Duke have anything to do with this thread?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 03:45:54 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfcienfv.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Hy7jd.48426$_g6.25114@okepread03...
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
Ditto.
Rules are rules.
Funny how *that* doesn't apply to your whinefest against Duke Energy, eh?
It does apply. Why are you trying to sustain a lie?
Looks like they played by the rules, and the state decided on the evidence.
You are attacking me because you KNOW if I keep alive and keep up my plight
for justice that I will eventually get it, and what does that mean for you?
It measn I'll have more opportunities to push your buttons and let you show
what a whackjob you are, of course.
Are you in league with the cruel liars and deceivers?
You tell me. I know the correct answer to that question, and you never will.
Your days are numbered, I hope you know that.
Not because of anything done by *you*, South Carolina Fruitcake. That's a
very safe assumption.
People are sick of the complaining sects of the USA that complain about the
existing laws all the way back to Roe VS. Wade.
Really? I seem to have no trouble finding some who aren't happy about
Amendment XVI, which goes back a bit prior to 1973 (like about seven
decades prior).
No response? You really don't like being shown as the idiot you are, do you?
There's a logical solution: quit making idiotic assertions.
We need justice in the USA, not so many special interest, unfaithful
measures which produce less faith and more complaints.
..unless, of course, it keeps you from getting what you claim is due you
from Duke Energy.
Wy canl;t you keep your mouth shut regarding my persoanl business?
Why did you post all about it to this newsgroup?
How does my claim against Duke have anything to do with this thread?
How does any of your mental illness have anything to do with this newsgroup?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 06:00:16 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfcid52l.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfcienfv.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Hy7jd.48426$_g6.25114@okepread03...
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
Ditto.
Rules are rules.
Funny how *that* doesn't apply to your whinefest against Duke Energy,
eh?
It does apply. Why are you trying to sustain a lie?
Looks like they played by the rules, and the state decided on the
evidence.
Not even close.
Why are you siding with liars?
They did not play by the rule book, and they were derelict, negligent, and
due diligence was not performed, and they violated my rights and they failed
to consider evidence.
Why do you want to lie about it?
You are attacking me because you KNOW if I keep alive and keep up my
plight
for justice that I will eventually get it, and what does that mean for
you?
It measn I'll have more opportunities to push your buttons and let you
show
what a whackjob you are, of course.
You're not pushing my buttons.
My button was pushed long ago.
I will not explode , but if I do, there will be some serious repercussions
because of it.
11 years is a long time, and the longer it goes, the worse it will be for
the transgressors in this case.
I know that to be the case. They that caused me so much harm and failed to
aright their wrongs and maintain lies against me will be very sorry they did
so if sufficient remedy is not delivered to me.
I do not play like they play.
I am much better than them, and I will not bear any guilt or share in any
punishment that may come upon them.
Are you in league with the cruel liars and deceivers?
You tell me. I know the correct answer to that question, and you never
will.
You side with them, so why shouldn;t I ask you such?
Your days are numbered, I hope you know that.
Not because of anything done by *you*, South Carolina Fruitcake. That's a
very safe assumption.
Good.
But the days I am speaking of do not refer to your life, they refer to the
logevity of unjust rule in the USA.
People are sick of the complaining sects of the USA that complain about
the
existing laws all the way back to Roe VS. Wade.
Really? I seem to have no trouble finding some who aren't happy about
Amendment XVI, which goes back a bit prior to 1973 (like about seven
decades prior).
No response? You really don't like being shown as the idiot you are, do
you?
There's a logical solution: quit making idiotic assertions.
Amendment XVI?
Should I read it?
We need justice in the USA, not so many special interest, unfaithful
measures which produce less faith and more complaints.
..unless, of course, it keeps you from getting what you claim is due you
from Duke Energy.
Wy can't you keep your mouth shut regarding my persoanl business?
Why did you post all about it to this newsgroup?
In this thread?
How does my claim against Duke have anything to do with this thread?
How does any of your mental illness have anything to do with this
newsgroup?
Is that your answer?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 10:51:27 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfcid52l.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvfcienfv.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Hy7jd.48426$_g6.25114@okepread03...
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
Ditto.
Rules are rules.
Funny how *that* doesn't apply to your whinefest against Duke Energy,
eh?
It does apply. Why are you trying to sustain a lie?
Looks like they played by the rules, and the state decided on the
evidence.
Not even close.
Why are you siding with liars?
When are you ever going to prove that they are the liars? (February 30th of
some year, I suspect.)
They did not play by the rule book, and they were derelict, negligent, and
due diligence was not performed, and they violated my rights and they failed
to consider evidence.
Why do you want to lie about it?
I'm not lying about it. You have yet to provide credible proof of *your*
assertions.
You are attacking me because you KNOW if I keep alive and keep up my plight
for justice that I will eventually get it, and what does that mean for you?
It measn I'll have more opportunities to push your buttons and let you show
what a whackjob you are, of course.
You're not pushing my buttons.
Keep saying that. You might even convince someone of it, eventually.
My button was pushed long ago.
I will not explode , but if I do, there will be some serious repercussions
because of it.
I hope the various applicable police departments in your area are well aware
of that.
11 years is a long time, and the longer it goes, the worse it will be for
the transgressors in this case.
What a revelation! A known nutbar proclaiming his intent in a public
newsgroup.
I know that to be the case. They that caused me so much harm and failed to
aright their wrongs and maintain lies against me will be very sorry they did
so if sufficient remedy is not delivered to me.
What are you going to do? Keep whining at them?
I do not play like they play.
Obviously not, since they likely are in a bit more frequent contact with
reality than you've been any time in the last four decades.
I am much better than them, and I will not bear any guilt or share in any
punishment that may come upon them.
....even if *you* administer it upon them. *snicker*
Are you in league with the cruel liars and deceivers?
You tell me. I know the correct answer to that question, and you never
will.
You side with them, so why shouldn;t I ask you such?
Go ahead and ask. It's not like you'd ever figure out the answer on your own.
Your days are numbered, I hope you know that.
Not because of anything done by *you*, South Carolina Fruitcake. That's a
very safe assumption.
Good.
But the days I am speaking of do not refer to your life, they refer to the
logevity of unjust rule in the USA.
Sorry, no one else is interested in your wet dream.
People are sick of the complaining sects of the USA that complain about
the existing laws all the way back to Roe VS. Wade.
Really? I seem to have no trouble finding some who aren't happy about
Amendment XVI, which goes back a bit prior to 1973 (like about seven
decades prior).
No response? You really don't like being shown as the idiot you are, do
you? There's a logical solution: quit making idiotic assertions.
Amendment XVI? Should I read it?
You obviously didn't bother with doing that when you were in school.
We need justice in the USA, not so many special interest, unfaithful
measures which produce less faith and more complaints.
..unless, of course, it keeps you from getting what you claim is due you
from Duke Energy.
Wy can't you keep your mouth shut regarding my persoanl business?
Why did you post all about it to this newsgroup?
In this thread?
Your memory's obviously defective -- when you first wandered into this
newsgroup a couple of years ago, you were basically the same babbling loon you
are now, save for an explanation of what turned you into the South Carolina
Fruitcake. That ought to be pretty easy to see if you know how to Google
yourself.
How does my claim against Duke have anything to do with this thread?
How does any of your mental illness have anything to do with this
newsgroup?
Is that your answer?
No. Unlike you, I don't spend my life answering questions with nothing but
more questions.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Galen Hekhuis" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 11:49:46 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 12:23:41 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Hy7jd.48426$_g6.25114@okepread03...
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
Ditto.
Rules are rules.
People are sick of the complaining sects of the USA that complain about the
existing laws all the way back to Roe VS. Wade.
We need justice in the USA, not so many special interest, unfaithful
measures which produce less faith and more complaints.
What would you think if one of the "referees" in a Steelers vs. Redskins
match were actually an employee of the Steelers (or an unabashed fan) and
ruled in favor of the Steelers in a somewhat disputed call that led to
victory for the Steelers? If you're a fan of the Steelers you might
applaud the ruling. If you were a fan of the Redskins you might well
indeed claim that the game was stolen. If you are a fan of football you
might consider the impartiality of the officials more important than the
outcome of any one game. likewise, if you are an American you will
conclude that free and fair elections are far, far more important than
whoever wins a particular election. Americans, be they Christian, Jewish,
Agnostic, Atheist, Republican, Democrat, whatever, should demand
accountability. To do anything else is simply un-American. Rules may
indeed be rules, however, they should be enforced with impartiality, and
whenever or where ever they are suspect, should be available and open to
examination and the light of day.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Guns don't kill people, religions do
.
|
|
|
| User: "Resasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 12:25:11 PM |
|
|
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4o2qo054p323m4jfc55ajbrhhnt1tshi85@4ax.com...
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 12:23:41 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Hy7jd.48426$_g6.25114@okepread03...
We won, get over it. Don't be a Gore crybaby....
Ditto.
Rules are rules.
People are sick of the complaining sects of the USA that complain about
the
existing laws all the way back to Roe VS. Wade.
We need justice in the USA, not so many special interest, unfaithful
measures which produce less faith and more complaints.
What would you think if one of the "referees" in a Steelers vs. Redskins
match were actually an employee of the Steelers (or an unabashed fan) and
ruled in favor of the Steelers in a somewhat disputed call that led to
victory for the Steelers? If you're a fan of the Steelers you might
applaud the ruling. If you were a fan of the Redskins you might well
indeed claim that the game was stolen. If you are a fan of football you
might consider the impartiality of the officials more important than the
outcome of any one game. likewise, if you are an American you will
conclude that free and fair elections are far, far more important than
whoever wins a particular election. Americans, be they Christian, Jewish,
Agnostic, Atheist, Republican, Democrat, whatever, should demand
accountability. To do anything else is simply un-American. Rules may
indeed be rules, however, they should be enforced with impartiality, and
whenever or where ever they are suspect, should be available and open to
examination and the light of day.
Well said, but we still won. Get over it. Actually thats not quite true. The
republicans won. I'm independant. Bush would have been my second choice
though. Nader wouldn't even had made the list.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 01:07:55 PM |
|
|
"Resasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:LF8jd.48434$_g6.43714@okepread03:
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4o2qo054p323m4jfc55ajbrhhnt1tshi85@4ax.com...
What would you think if one of the "referees" in a Steelers vs.
Redskins match were actually an employee of the Steelers (or an
unabashed fan) and ruled in favor of the Steelers in a somewhat
disputed call that led to victory for the Steelers? If you're a fan of
the Steelers you might applaud the ruling. If you were a fan of the
Redskins you might well indeed claim that the game was stolen. If you
are a fan of football you might consider the impartiality of the
officials more important than the outcome of any one game. likewise,
if you are an American you will conclude that free and fair elections
are far, far more important than whoever wins a particular election.
Americans, be they Christian, Jewish, Agnostic, Atheist, Republican,
Democrat, whatever, should demand accountability. To do anything else
is simply un-American. Rules may indeed be rules, however, they should
be enforced with impartiality, and whenever or where ever they are
suspect, should be available and open to examination and the light of
day.
Well said, but we still won.
perhaps not.
as i said in the original post to this thread
"last tuesday around 4pm est, there were a lot of reports floating around
that kerry was winning big in all of the contested (swing) states. this
chatter, based on many exit polls, continued until the time when actual
results were released contradicting the early polls.
on wednesday, we heard several news/talk shows asking why the exit po0lls
were so far off in so many states.
what if the exit polls weren't off? what if they were accurate and
something else accounted for the vote differences? we've already heart
rumors, and more from ohio regarding advance voting and lost votes.
similar sounds are coming out of florida too.
a long time ago, there were rumors that the gop had staged a break-in.
almost everone ignored these rumors until, several months later, they
became the watergate scandal.
who knows what might emerge in the next few months?"
exit polls have been accurate for many years. what do you think make them
all be so wrong this year?
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Galen Hekhuis" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 01:24:22 PM |
|
|
On 6 Nov 2004 19:07:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com>
wrote:
perhaps not.
as i said in the original post to this thread
"last tuesday around 4pm est, there were a lot of reports floating around
that kerry was winning big in all of the contested (swing) states. this
chatter, based on many exit polls, continued until the time when actual
results were released contradicting the early polls.
on wednesday, we heard several news/talk shows asking why the exit po0lls
were so far off in so many states.
what if the exit polls weren't off? what if they were accurate and
something else accounted for the vote differences? we've already heart
rumors, and more from ohio regarding advance voting and lost votes.
similar sounds are coming out of florida too.
a long time ago, there were rumors that the gop had staged a break-in.
almost everone ignored these rumors until, several months later, they
became the watergate scandal.
who knows what might emerge in the next few months?"
exit polls have been accurate for many years. what do you think make them
all be so wrong this year?
All that may happen, but I'm not sure if I want Kerry and Edwards and crew
running this country anymore. They swore they would insure that every vote
would be counted, and yet conceded long before the votes actually were.
There were early indications that there would be voter fraud, not to
mention the debacle in Florida (where I live) in 2000. They pretty much
ignored that. I have to admit, I never suspected that Kerry would make
Gore look like a tough fighter, but darned if he didn't succeed.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Guns don't kill people, religions do
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 05:41:31 PM |
|
|
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:9m8qo0tm0o49cstqpkvnul3g3crnsku75c@4ax.com...
On 6 Nov 2004 19:07:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com>
wrote:
perhaps not.
as i said in the original post to this thread
"last tuesday around 4pm est, there were a lot of reports floating around
that kerry was winning big in all of the contested (swing) states. this
chatter, based on many exit polls, continued until the time when actual
results were released contradicting the early polls.
on wednesday, we heard several news/talk shows asking why the exit po0lls
were so far off in so many states.
what if the exit polls weren't off? what if they were accurate and
something else accounted for the vote differences? we've already heart
rumors, and more from ohio regarding advance voting and lost votes.
similar sounds are coming out of florida too.
a long time ago, there were rumors that the gop had staged a break-in.
almost everone ignored these rumors until, several months later, they
became the watergate scandal.
who knows what might emerge in the next few months?"
exit polls have been accurate for many years. what do you think make them
all be so wrong this year?
All that may happen, but I'm not sure if I want Kerry and Edwards and crew
running this country anymore. They swore they would insure that every
vote
would be counted, and yet conceded long before the votes actually were.
Because Americans don't want to go through this ordeal again. It was so
evident Bush won, Kerry and Edwards did the right thing. Dragging this
country through another long ordeal would have really done it in for the
Democrats.
There were early indications that there would be voter fraud, not to
mention the debacle in Florida (where I live) in 2000. They pretty much
ignored that. I have to admit, I never suspected that Kerry would make
Gore look like a tough fighter, but darned if he didn't succeed.
Maybe because Kerry and Edwards were men about it and accepted what
happened.
Looks like some of you can't be that tall.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Some-Writer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 06:22:19 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:41:31 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:9m8qo0tm0o49cstqpkvnul3g3crnsku75c@4ax.com...
On 6 Nov 2004 19:07:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com>
wrote:
perhaps not.
as i said in the original post to this thread
"last tuesday around 4pm est, there were a lot of reports floating around
that kerry was winning big in all of the contested (swing) states. this
chatter, based on many exit polls, continued until the time when actual
results were released contradicting the early polls.
on wednesday, we heard several news/talk shows asking why the exit po0lls
were so far off in so many states.
what if the exit polls weren't off? what if they were accurate and
something else accounted for the vote differences? we've already heart
rumors, and more from ohio regarding advance voting and lost votes.
similar sounds are coming out of florida too.
a long time ago, there were rumors that the gop had staged a break-in.
almost everone ignored these rumors until, several months later, they
became the watergate scandal.
who knows what might emerge in the next few months?"
exit polls have been accurate for many years. what do you think make them
all be so wrong this year?
All that may happen, but I'm not sure if I want Kerry and Edwards and crew
running this country anymore. They swore they would insure that every
vote
would be counted, and yet conceded long before the votes actually were.
Because Americans don't want to go through this ordeal again. It was so
evident Bush won...
Really?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
06 Nov 2004 06:31:04 PM |
|
|
Some-Writer <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
news:ilqqo0lg0ho254mqna3njtg00den24qpp6@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:41:31 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Because Americans don't want to go through this ordeal again. It was so
evident Bush won...
Really?
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually believe that.
and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing facts. he does not want to
do that.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
08 Nov 2004 11:57:07 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Some-Writer <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
news:ilqqo0lg0ho254mqna3njtg00den24qpp6@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:41:31 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Because Americans don't want to go through this ordeal again. It was so
evident Bush won...
Really?
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually believe that.
and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing facts. he does not want to
do that.
"we can not win this election." - John Kerry
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 09:46:26 AM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:T_Yjd.2867$sz7.2010@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Some-Writer <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
news:ilqqo0lg0ho254mqna3njtg00den24qpp6@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:41:31 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Because Americans don't want to go through this ordeal again. It was
so evident Bush won...
Really?
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually believe
that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing facts. he does
not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 10:13:22 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:T_Yjd.2867$sz7.2010@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Some-Writer <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
news:ilqqo0lg0ho254mqna3njtg00den24qpp6@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:41:31 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Because Americans don't want to go through this ordeal again. It was
so evident Bush won...
Really?
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually believe
that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing facts. he does
not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost, Sigmund. If someone
has a 150,000 vote lead, and there are only 10,000 votes left to
tabulate, you know who won.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 11:03:07 AM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in news:C06kd.2896$rz7.1791
@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually believe
that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing facts. he does
not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were actually the
result of votes for bush.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 11:15:14 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in news:C06kd.2896$rz7.1791
@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually believe
that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing facts. he does
not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were actually the
result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion that the election was fraudulent.
The onus of proof is on you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 11:18:54 AM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:CW6kd.2920$Kz7.660@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually believe
that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing facts. he
does not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were actually
the result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion
you are lying. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost."
your statement is still included above.
i am not surprised you ran away from it.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 11:26:19 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:CW6kd.2920$Kz7.660@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually believe
that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing facts. he
does not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were actually
the result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion
you are lying. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost."
Which is a FACT, something you seem to have a very difficult time coming
to terms with. Perhaps a professional could help you deal with your
post-election trauma.
your statement is still included above.
i am not surprised you ran away from it.
So you're running from proving your claim of a fraudulent election. How
convenient for you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 11:45:07 AM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:%47kd.2927$6O7.1089@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually
believe that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing
facts. he does not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion
you are lying. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
Which is a FACT,
stop lying. whan you asserted that lie earlier, i asked you to prove it by
demonstrating that machine votes recorded for bush were actually cast for
bush. you ran away. you can have another chance now.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 02:13:59 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:%47kd.2927$6O7.1089@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually
believe that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing
facts. he does not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion
you are lying. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
Which is a FACT,
stop lying.
To call you a liar is not a lie.
whan you asserted that lie earlier, i asked you to prove it
Prove what, that everyone on the planet except a few fringe extremists
(like you) know and (most importantly) can come to terms with the FACT
that Kerry lost?
by demonstrating that machine votes recorded for bush were actually cast for
bush. you ran away. you can have another chance now.
Kerry knows and admits he lost.
Every Democratic lapdog on television knows and admits Kerry lost.
The DNC knows and admits Kerry lost.
Clinton knows and admits Kerry lost (and says you should stop whining
about it)
I hold the same position as them. Call me a liar, and you are calling
Kerry, the DNC, and Clinton liars as well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 03:39:34 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:by9kd.2961$YP7.2898@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:%47kd.2927$6O7.1089@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually
believe that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing
facts. he does not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion
you are lying. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
Which is a FACT,
stop lying.
To call you a liar is not a lie.
so when you get caught lying you make up new lies. are you trying to become
the next osprey?
whan you asserted that lie earlier, i asked you to prove it
Prove what
your claim. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
i told you to "prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush." both of those quotes are inckluded
above, but i understand why you need to pretend they are not
by demonstrating that machine votes recorded for bush were actually
cast for bush. you ran away. you can have another chance now.
there it is again
were you particularly nervous when you replied?
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 05:17:09 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:by9kd.2961$YP7.2898@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:%47kd.2927$6O7.1089@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
of course not. but coward bobby, and those like him actually
believe that. and the "ordeal" bobby is referring to is facing
facts. he does not want to do that.
Anyone with a brain knows Kerry lost, Sigmund.
no one can know that since the votes haven't been counted.
Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion
you are lying. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
Which is a FACT,
stop lying.
To call you a liar is not a lie.
so when you get caught lying you make up new lies.
Caught lying? Liar.
are you trying to become the next osprey?
Are you trying to maintain the status quo?
whan you asserted that lie earlier, i asked you to prove it
Prove what
your claim. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
That? Sorry, didn't realize that you weren't aware of such things in
your little partisan bubble.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/
It's all over except for the certification.
i told you to "prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush." both of those quotes are inckluded
above, but i understand why you need to pretend they are not
by demonstrating that machine votes recorded for bush were actually
cast for bush. you ran away. you can have another chance now.
there it is again
were you particularly nervous when you replied?
Were you paritcularly coherent when you read it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
09 Nov 2004 05:41:15 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:Vdckd.2994$5Y7.2111@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion
you are lying. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
Which is a FACT,
stop lying.
To call you a liar is not a lie.
so when you get caught lying you make up new lies.
Caught lying?
you were and you did
whan you asserted that lie earlier, i asked you to prove it
Prove what
your claim. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
That?
that.
i am still waiting
Sorry, didn't realize that you weren't aware of such things in
your little partisan bubble.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/
It's all over except for the certification.
this link does not prove that machine voted recorded for bush were actually
cast for bush. is that because you know they were not?
i told you to "prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush." both of those quotes are
included above, but i understand why you need to pretend they are not
and i am still waiting for your evidence.
you don't have any evidence, do you?
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
10 Nov 2004 07:39:50 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:Vdckd.2994$5Y7.2111@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
not true. prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush.
You're the one making the assertion
you are lying. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
Which is a FACT,
stop lying.
To call you a liar is not a lie.
so when you get caught lying you make up new lies.
Caught lying?
you were and you did
whan you asserted that lie earlier, i asked you to prove it
Prove what
your claim. you said "Enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry
lost."
That?
that.
i am still waiting
Sorry, didn't realize that you weren't aware of such things in
your little partisan bubble.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/
It's all over except for the certification.
this link does not prove that machine voted recorded for bush were actually
cast for bush.
If that's what you wanted proof for, then perhaps you should ask for it.
You asked for proof that enough have been counted to KNOW that Kerry lost.
When you learn how to ask a question OR answer one, let me know.
is that because you know they were not?
Is it because you're ignorant?
hmmm... so many choices.
i told you to "prove that the machine votes recorded for bush were
actually the result of votes for bush." both of those quotes are
included above, but i understand why you need to pretend they are not
and i am still waiting for your evidence.
you don't have any evidence, do you?
Evidence for what, Flamer?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: what if the exit polls were right? |
10 Nov 2004 07:54:42 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:Gpzkd.3953$qh5.1593@news01.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Sorry, didn't realize that you weren't aware of such things in
your little partisan bubble.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/
It's all over except for the certification.
this link does not prove that machine voted recorded for bush were
actually cast for bush.
If that's what you wanted proof for, then perhaps you should ask for it.
done repeatedly to you directly, and you ran and/or tried to misrepresent.
--
http://www.votetoimpeach.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
