| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Gactimus" |
| Date: |
26 Jan 2005 11:06:54 AM |
| Object: |
When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
The Democrats are halfway there now. They have already shown sympathy for
terrorists and demonstrated their refusal to take a proactive role in
defeating Islamic extremists.
Their next step: convert to Islam.
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
27 Jan 2005 01:08:44 AM |
|
|
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
The Democrats are halfway there now. They have already shown sympathy for
terrorists
Bush has done more to promote terrorism than any other "American".
Including you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ninure Saunders" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
27 Jan 2005 09:13:56 AM |
|
|
Published on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
Wasnt Jesus A Liberal?
by Gary Vance
Liberalism has been under assault for years now. The battering of this
grand political philosophy has altered the contemporary definition of
liberal to the point that Conservatives use it as a profane word. They use
it to paint a political opponent as anti-God and anti-American. It has
gotten to the point that moderate and liberal Christians are afraid to be
open about their political leanings. Sadly, it even affects their
conscience and choices as they enter the voting booth. This is
particularly troubling to me as a Christian evangelical minister who loves
America.
Liberalism as defined by Websters Third New International Dictionary: a
political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness
of man, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for tolerance and
freedom for the individual from arbitrary authority in all spheres of life
I am not sure why anyone would feel threatened by Liberalism as defined by
the dictionary. They are apparently unaware or simply refuse to
acknowledge the long history of liberals who have labored for the
betterment of society and the furthering of Gods Kingdom.
The labor movement of the early twentieth century was aided significantly
when major Christian denominations got behind it. No average American
would have a fair wage today if it werent for liberal Christians and labor
activists. Liberal Christians and civil rights activists fought and still
fight against conservative America for racial equality. Child labor laws
were enacted because liberals fought for them. Medicare and Social
Security exist today because of Liberalism. Bleeding heart liberals have
long advocated for the homeless, the hungry, the less fortunate, and the
disenfranchised. The women of America owe liberals a big thank you for
their almost equal rights. Tree hugging liberals fight for clean air and
water standards instead of favoring industrial polluters and short term
profiteering that destroy Gods green earth.
Liberals believe in affordable health care for all U.S. citizens. They
also believe in higher taxes for the rich and lower taxes for the middle
class and the poor. Liberals love their spouses and children. Liberals
faithfully attend their churches to worship God. Liberals love America and
hate terrorism and have proved it by fighting in every war for this
country. Liberals come in all shapes, sizes, and color. They are found in
the ranks of Protestants, Catholics, Jews, agnostics, and atheists.
Conservative Republican policies generally favor the wealthy and ignore
the needs of the poor. Their policies are so often greed-driven, with no
concern for the environmental or societal consequences for their
exploitive actions. Jesus plainly taught that the love of money is the
root of all evil. So, Christians can go after the various fruit of sin in
our society, but they wont see the real change for the better until the
axe is laid to the root. Christians should oppose greed-driven policies as
a primary point of political concern.
I am sick of reading letters to the editor and editorials that paint
Democrats and liberals as anti-God and anti-American and that portray
conservative Republicans as the only true Christian patriots. We know that
many Democrats are pro-choice and many support gay issues and this
troubles most evangelicals. Democrats also support causes that should be
of Christian concern that go untouched by Republicans. I have listed some
in the above paragraphs. True prophetic vision sees that there is great
need for repentance on the left and the right. The effects of powerful
lobbyists, special interest groups, greed and corruption abound on both
sides of the aisles of Congress. God sees it all and so should Christians.
Christian voters need to see that Gods heart breaks over more than just a
few political and moral issues. It is time to take off our blinders and
mourn for the sorry state of affairs that is American politics.
Jesus was the ultimate liberal progressive revolutionary of all history.
The conservative religious and social structure that He defied hated and
crucified Him. They examined His life and did not like what they saw. He
aligned Himself with the poor and the oppressed. He challenged the
religious orthodoxy of His day. He advocated pacifism and loving our
enemies. He liberated women and minorities from oppression. He healed on
the Sabbath and forgave adulterers and prostitutes. He associated with
drunks and other social outcasts. He rebuked the religious right of His
day because they embraced the letter of the law instead of the Spirit. He
loved sinners and called them to Himself. Jesus was the original Liberal.
He was a progressive, and He was judged and hated for it. It was the
self-righteous religionists that He rebuked and He called them hypocrites.
The primary issues of Christian Liberalism were birthed when Jesus spoke
the profoundly prophetic words found in Matthew 25: 31-46. These
scriptures reveal Gods heart for the poor, the sick and other neglected
people through out history. Christians should read this text and judge for
themselves which of the two groups mentioned there more accurately reflect
the political parties of today. His Liberalism lives on today and the
issues have not changed much.
I am glad that conservative Republican candidates advocate for the family
and a few Christian issues, but we must quit pretending that they are the
only ones that Christians should consider voting for. People should not
call themselves pro-life if they are only anti-abortion and yet feel no
twinge of conscience over the unfair application of capital punishment or
wars fought for dubious motives. A true pro-life position cares just as
passionately for the born as the un-born and views war as a last resort
when all other options are exhausted.
Christians should look for candidates that will work for issues that are
of importance to Christ and that can be tackled legislatively. Sadly, most
of those causes have historically been opposed, ignored, and minimized by
conservative Republican policy makers. They seem to dangle the moral
issues carrot around election time. Then, even with a Republican
controlled White House and Congress, prove themselves powerless to do
anything about those issues when they convene to legislate. Issues such as
eliminating poverty and homelessness in America, true equal rights for all
citizens, environmental protection, a fair minimum wage, affordable health
care, and lowering our infant mortality rate all go unattended. Thats just
to name a few.
I have some questions for the Christian Right. Why have you not held our
current elected majority officials accountable for their failure to
address the full spectrum of Christian issues? Why would you vote for them
again?
It is time for Christians of conscience to stand up to religious and
political hypocrisy. Christians should proudly proclaim progressive values
today and should advocate for the Christian Liberalism that is our
heritage and our legacy.
Gary Vance (Lezlo2025@wmconnect.com) lives in Loretto, Tennessee.
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
Take my polls
http://ninure.100megsfree5.com
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dell" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
28 Jan 2005 06:27:09 AM |
|
|
"Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote in message
news:RainbowChristiannohate-2701050929560001@h-68-164-13-25.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net...
| Published on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
|
| Wasnt Jesus A Liberal?
|
| by Gary Vance
All well and good. But you should not have to keep rewriting history and
apologise for its monsters to get your views accepted. When "liberals" denounce
the likes of Edward Said, Naom Chomsky, Michael Moore and Robert Fisk (to say
nothing of lice like Arafat) for their lies and half-truths, they will get some
credibility.
Liberal - 8/10 for values. 2/10 for truth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
28 Jan 2005 11:08:56 PM |
|
|
Richard Dell <rfdell@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote in message
| Published on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
|
| Wasnt Jesus A Liberal?
|
| by Gary Vance
All well and good. But you should not have to keep rewriting history and
apologise for its monsters to get your views accepted. When "liberals" denounce
the likes of Edward Said, Naom Chomsky, Michael Moore and Robert Fisk (to say
nothing of lice like Arafat) for their lies and half-truths, they will get some
credibility.
Typical neocon - it's always somebody else's fault. Killing tens of
thousands of people is no worse than having unpopular opinions.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
26 Jan 2005 12:53:31 PM |
|
|
Gactimus wrote:
The Democrats are halfway there now. They have already shown sympathy for
terrorists and demonstrated their refusal to take a proactive role in
defeating Islamic extremists.
Their next step: convert to Islam.
1) http://www.boreme.com/bm/JAN05/a/vw-suicide-bomber/fr.htm
2) Idiot.
Yahweh is a bloody vindictive evil god. Cults of Yahweh either go
secular or are damned.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "1MAN4ALL" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
26 Jan 2005 03:00:15 PM |
|
|
Gactimus wrote:
The Democrats are halfway there now. They have already shown
sympathy for
terrorists and demonstrated their refusal to take a proactive role in
defeating Islamic extremists.
Their next step: convert to Islam.
True Islam has a centrist ideology and non-Muslim Democrats and
Republicans can find many things attractive in this growing faith.
Islam promotes equality of races and social welfare programs which
Liberals would like very much. At the same time, its emphasis on
personal responsibility, chastity, family values; prohibition on
intoxicants; and rejection of homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle
could be very appealing to Conservatives.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Photios MIchael lat46nospamn.chapter.com" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
26 Jan 2005 04:18:43 PM |
|
|
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1106773215.709643.49400@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Gactimus wrote:
The Democrats are halfway there now. They have already shown
sympathy for
terrorists and demonstrated their refusal to take a proactive role in
defeating Islamic extremists.
Their next step: convert to Islam.
True Islam has a centrist ideology and non-Muslim Democrats and
Republicans can find many things attractive in this growing faith.
Islam promotes equality of races and social welfare programs which
Liberals would like very much. At the same time, its emphasis on
personal responsibility, chastity, family values; prohibition on
intoxicants; and rejection of homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle
could be very appealing to Conservatives.
Ah, yes, we should just forget all about the Islam that we see everywhere,
because they are not "True Muslims" This invisible, unseen "True Islam" will
save us.
Anyone who is so blind as to believe that deserves what they get.
Lies, murder, and more murder.
--
++++++++++++
Eschew obfuscation
Photios Michael
~~~~><//////°>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Abdul-Khinzeer Kalbullaah al-Murtad Shabazz" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
27 Jan 2005 01:18:48 PM |
|
|
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message:
news:<1106773215.709643.49400@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> ...
Islam promotes equality of races and social welfare programs which
Liberals would like very much.
This is true of Islam in theory anyway, and this is the same with
Christianity in theory. Of course, if these are things that
Conservatives allegedly are against, Islam would therefore not appeal
to them.
At the same time, its emphasis on
personal responsibility, chastity, family values; prohibition on
intoxicants; and rejection of homosexuality as an alternative
lifestyle
could be very appealing to Conservatives.
The homophobia (and to a lesser degree, religious intolerance) of Islam
would make Liberals run from it. They could promote equality among the
races and welfare programs without siding with such an divisive faith.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
28 Jan 2005 12:34:04 PM |
|
|
Abdul-Khinzeer Kalbullaah al-Murtad Shabazz wrote:
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message:
news:<1106773215.709643.49400@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> ...
Islam promotes equality of races and social welfare programs which
Liberals would like very much.
This is true of Islam in theory anyway, and this is the same with
Christianity in theory. Of course, if these are things that
Conservatives allegedly are against, Islam would therefore not appeal
to them.
There are many things that Bush has said that would not appeal to
Conservatives but they still voted for him. The point that I was trying
to make was that Muslims stand somewhere in the middle between
arch-Conservatives and arch-Liberals, which is also where most
Americans want to be. Islam can provide the moral code and ideology for
the middle path which is currently absent.
At the same time, its emphasis on
personal responsibility, chastity, family values; prohibition on
intoxicants; and rejection of homosexuality as an alternative
lifestyle
could be very appealing to Conservatives.
The homophobia (and to a lesser degree, religious intolerance) of
Islam
would make Liberals run from it. They could promote equality among
the
races and welfare programs without siding with such an divisive
faith.
You are falsely assuming that all Liberals are for gay rights. Although
there are 'some' intolerant Muslims, the vast majority is not. Islam is
against homosexual 'acts', not homosexuals themselves, and considers
homosexuality to be an abnormality.
Early in Islamic history, as science was in its infancy, the only way
to stop these acts was to punish those who indulged in them. But as
science continues to make progress, it is very possible that a cure
would one day be found for this mental disorder. The question is
whether scientists would be allowed to do proper research and not be
forced to consider this deviancy as normal behavior.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
29 Jan 2005 01:01:08 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Abdul-Khinzeer Kalbullaah al-Murtad Shabazz wrote:
"1MAN4ALL" < > wrote in message:
news:<1106773215.709643.49400@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> ...
Islam promotes equality of races and social welfare programs
which
Liberals would like very much.
This is true of Islam in theory anyway, and this is the same with
Christianity in theory. Of course, if these are things that
Conservatives allegedly are against, Islam would therefore not
appeal
to them.
There are many things that Bush has said that would not appeal to
Conservatives but they still voted for him. The point that I was
trying
to make was that Muslims stand somewhere in the middle between
arch-Conservatives and arch-Liberals, which is also where most
Americans want to be. Islam can provide the moral code and ideology
for
the middle path which is currently absent.
At the same time, its emphasis on
personal responsibility, chastity, family values; prohibition on
intoxicants; and rejection of homosexuality as an alternative
lifestyle
could be very appealing to Conservatives.
The homophobia (and to a lesser degree, religious intolerance) of
Islam
would make Liberals run from it. They could promote equality among
the
races and welfare programs without siding with such an divisive
faith.
You are falsely assuming that all Liberals are for gay rights.
Although
there are 'some' intolerant Muslims, the vast majority is not. Islam
is
against homosexual 'acts', not homosexuals themselves, and considers
homosexuality to be an abnormality.
Early in Islamic history, as science was in its infancy, the only way
to stop these acts was to punish those who indulged in them. But as
science continues to make progress, it is very possible that a cure
would one day be found for this mental disorder. The question is
whether scientists would be allowed to do proper research and not be
forced to consider this deviancy as normal behavior.
People shouldn't take issue against Islam because it did not think
highly of homosexuality; if something was thought ill and harmful, it
follows that a moral teaching would advise to avoid it.
It's interesting that you say "mental disorder", and the reason is that
up to 1973 the Diagnostic Manual of Mental Disorders of the American
Psychiatric Association (APA) did include ego-syntonic (comfortable
with orientation) homosexuality as a mental disorder. The reason it was
dropped was not a change in scientific or medical thinking, but that
homosexual activists besieged and disrupted psychiatric meetings and
intensely harrassed and abused psychiatrists. For instance,
psychiatrist Nelson Borelli was at the 1972 APA convention, and noted
the following in the BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL: "I was there in San
Francisco at the 1972 APA convention when the "Gay and Lesbian"
activists forced the APA leadership to promise to drop
"Homosexuality" from the diagnostic manual or else there would be
no APA Convention. Not only the scandal they were causing, but the
activists had gained control of the infrastructure of the convention
building. The APA kept the promise."'
And from THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATON OF GAY AND LESBIAN
PSYCHIATRISTS : "Following the Stonewall riots of 1969, gay activist
groups began to besiege the APA for its position that homosexuality was
a mental disorder. At a 1970 APA meeting in San Francisco, activists
slipped in. Once inside, they both verbally attacked the late Irving
Bieber at one meeting and disrupted another devoted to aversive
conditioning of "sexual deviation." In response to the protest,
the APA decided to open up its doors. In the following year, and for
the first time, a panel of openly gay men and women spoke directly to
psychiatrists at the 1971 annual meeting in Washington, D.C. Despite
the APA overture, however, there were still protests at that meeting.
Gay activists disrupted the Convocation of the Fellows, grabbed the
microphone and declared "war" on psychiatry. They also entered the
exhibition hall and demanded the removal of an exhibitor's booth
promoting aversive conditioning for the "treatment" of
homosexuality. The following year's 1972 APA convention in Dallas was
not marked by disruption. Instead, it featured, for the first time, a
booth in the exhibition hall entitled, "Gay, Proud and Healthy.""
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
28 Jan 2005 12:43:52 PM |
|
|
In article <1106937244.735404.45760@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
<forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote:
Abdul-Khinzeer Kalbullaah al-Murtad Shabazz wrote:
"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message:
news:<1106773215.709643.49400@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> ...
Islam promotes equality of races and social welfare programs which
Liberals would like very much.
This is true of Islam in theory anyway, and this is the same with
Christianity in theory. Of course, if these are things that
Conservatives allegedly are against, Islam would therefore not appeal
to them.
There are many things that Bush has said that would not appeal to
Conservatives but they still voted for him.
They are sheep.
The point that I was trying
to make was that Muslims stand somewhere in the middle between
arch-Conservatives and arch-Liberals, which is also where most
Americans want to be. Islam can provide the moral code and ideology for
the middle path which is currently absent.
Better yet, get rid of all religions. Then we will have less hate in
the world.
At the same time, its emphasis on
personal responsibility, chastity, family values; prohibition on
intoxicants; and rejection of homosexuality as an alternative
lifestyle
could be very appealing to Conservatives.
The homophobia (and to a lesser degree, religious intolerance) of
Islam
would make Liberals run from it. They could promote equality among
the
races and welfare programs without siding with such an divisive
faith.
You are falsely assuming that all Liberals are for gay rights. Although
there are 'some' intolerant Muslims, the vast majority is not. Islam is
against homosexual 'acts', not homosexuals themselves, and considers
homosexuality to be an abnormality.
I guess it is the job of religion to make that decision, huh?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bush is the AntiChrist!! " |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
28 Jan 2005 06:57:22 PM |
|
|
1MAN4ALL wrote:
Gactimus wrote:
The Democrats are halfway there now. They have already shown
sympathy for
terrorists and demonstrated their refusal to take a proactive role in
defeating Islamic extremists.
Their next step: convert to Islam.
True Islam has a centrist ideology and non-Muslim Democrats and
Republicans can find many things attractive in this growing faith.
Islam promotes equality of races and social welfare programs which
Liberals would like very much. At the same time, its emphasis on
personal responsibility, chastity, family values; prohibition on
intoxicants; and rejection of homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle
could be very appealing to Conservatives.
Islam is a great religion. The US President has said so and he loves
the Qur'an. Bush's best friends are the royal families of Jordan,
Kuwait and Saudi, so Republicans should convert to Islam.
--
Discussion forums for American Liberals, by Liberals:
http://www.comicboards.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
26 Jan 2005 03:31:02 PM |
|
|
http://www.zonaeuropa.com/01467.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "patrick_darcy" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
26 Jan 2005 04:20:11 PM |
|
|
Gactimus wrote:
The Democrats are halfway there now. They have already shown sympathy for
terrorists and demonstrated their refusal to take a proactive role in
defeating Islamic extremists.
Their next step: convert to Islam.
your way of being is quite sick.
u might take this to your church. im sure many people would
love to read about your hatred.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wordsmith" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
28 Jan 2005 12:27:34 AM |
|
|
When? When they feel comfortable with the "honor killing" concept.
Btw, there was a recent news story of an Islamic man who, fresh back
from the Hajj, suspected his 14 year old daughter of having sex. After
he murdered her, it was discovered she (her body, rather) was still a
virgin.
W : (
.
|
|
|
| User: "danti" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
28 Jan 2005 07:23:01 AM |
|
|
"Wordsmith" <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106893654.787786.185830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
When? When they feel comfortable with the "honor killing" concept.
Btw, there was a recent news story of an Islamic man who, fresh back
from the Hajj, suspected his 14 year old daughter of having sex.
After
he murdered her, it was discovered she (her body, rather) was still
a
virgin.
it is unworthy to identify an entire religion by the act of a single
person.....this is not the usual, if it were it would not be
news...read the koran and find out why....btw many an individual has
murdered their mates in western countries for less cause...."honor
killing"....sounds mob related...
W : (
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wordsmith" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
28 Jan 2005 11:16:39 PM |
|
|
I wasn't inditing the entire religion, danti. I said "Islamic man,"
not "the entire religion of Islam". There's a difference. A big one.
Thanks.
W : )
.
|
|
|
| User: "danti" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
29 Jan 2005 07:50:49 AM |
|
|
"Wordsmith" <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106975799.853663.293930@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
I wasn't inditing the entire religion, danti. I said "Islamic man,"
not "the entire religion of Islam". There's a difference. A big
one.
Thanks.
thank you for the clarification.....i guess to me "islamic man" is
another term for the religion of islam.....but i should have known
better ....no harm done i hope?
W : )
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wordsmith" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
29 Jan 2005 12:02:11 PM |
|
|
No, but don't let it happen again...or else! Hahahaha!
W : )
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bush is the AntiChrist!! " |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
29 Jan 2005 11:18:41 AM |
|
|
danti wrote:
"Wordsmith" <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106975799.853663.293930@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
I wasn't inditing the entire religion, danti. I said "Islamic man,"
not "the entire religion of Islam". There's a difference. A big
one.
Thanks.
thank you for the clarification.....i guess to me "islamic man" is
another term for the religion of islam.....but i should have known
better ....no harm done i hope?
W : )
What is an Islamic man, and how does that differ from a Muslim man?
--
Discussion forums for American Liberals, by Liberals:
http://www.comicboards.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi
.
|
|
|
| User: "danti" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Democrats convert to Islam? |
30 Jan 2005 06:46:30 AM |
|
|
"Bush is the AntiChrist!! " <tle_mgr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6_-dnVMvePAYWGbcRVn-1Q@comcast.com...
danti wrote:
"Wordsmith" <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106975799.853663.293930@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
I wasn't inditing the entire religion, danti. I said "Islamic
man,"
not "the entire religion of Islam". There's a difference. A big
one.
Thanks.
thank you for the clarification.....i guess to me "islamic man" is
another term for the religion of islam.....but i should have known
better ....no harm done i hope?
W : )
What is an Islamic man, and how does that differ from a Muslim man?
the origin of the word islam is a submission of the will to allah or
god.......and he who does so is called a muslim...
--
Discussion forums for American Liberals, by Liberals:
http://www.comicboards.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Republicans convert to Christianity? |
29 Jan 2005 01:43:26 PM |
|
|
Wordsmith <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote:
I wasn't inditing the entire religion, danti. I said "Islamic man,"
not "the entire religion of Islam". There's a difference. A big one.
And it was a Chirstian minister who took a gun and murdered two people
in front of a clinic because of what he believed.
And it was a "Christian" man who lied to the world in order to justify
a war that has killed tens of thousands of innocent people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wordsmith" |
|
| Title: Re: When will the Republicans convert to Christianity? |
30 Jan 2005 02:03:35 PM |
|
|
Sounds like a "two wrongs do not equal one right" situation.
W : )
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
