| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Johnny" |
| Date: |
07 Oct 2004 09:49:07 AM |
| Object: |
Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they thought was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
| User: "Shawn Hearn" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 09:01:24 PM |
|
|
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they thought was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision. Despite your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of abortion; they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only role the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question. Why do
men need to ban abortion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 11:09:41 PM |
|
|
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision. Despite your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of abortion; they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only role the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question. Why do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
11 Oct 2004 01:03:51 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision. Despite your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of abortion; they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only role the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question. Why do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
12 Oct 2004 11:01:17 AM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410102203.9ece442@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they
thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived
children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision. Despite your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of abortion; they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only role the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question. Why do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right
I did not ask anuything about right or wrong. I asked about NEED!
to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
You always been a wimp?
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
No need for it.
I aksed about NEED.
Learn to read. It rhymes with NEED.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
12 Oct 2004 10:43:30 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message news:<DcTad.310180$%n4.200651@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410102203.9ece442@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they
thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived
children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision. Despite your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of abortion; they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only role the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question. Why do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right
I did not ask anuything about right or wrong. I asked about NEED!
I was not talking about right and wrong. I was talking about rights
analogous to the right to freedom of religion and the right to freedom
of speech.
Or do you think that women do not have the right to control their own
bodies, as well as who or what uses them? Why?
to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
You always been a wimp?
I have never been a wimp. I just don't see any reason to force people
to obey me, especially with respect to their personal lives. I love
freedom and liberty too much to have any desire to force people to
follow my opinions and viewpoints.
However, you are such a weak person that you feel the need to demand
that people obey your whims to control their lives and their
decisions. That makes you shallow and pathetic.
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
No need for it.
Yes there is. If you know of any other way to end an unwanted
pregnancy without forcing the woman to endure months of pregnancy as
well as a torturous labor, let's hear it.
I aksed about NEED.
Learn to read. It rhymes with NEED.
I did. And I answered your question. You just did not like the
answer I gave because you cannot counter it without ignoring it or
ignoring the woman's rights.
If a woman does not want to remain pregnant, then she needs to end
that pregnancy. It is her body, and her preceived need that matters.
And since it is her body, her decision and her need to control the use
of her body overrides your need to make her suffer.
It is her live, her body, and her choice. That is all that there is
to it. There is no reason for her to be forced to suffer the effects
of an unwanted pregnancy just to satisfy a loser like you. She has
the right and the ability to make up her own mind about her pregnancy,
and she does not need you telling her what to do and what to think.
Your desire to do so only shows what a how afraid you are of
intelligent, strong-willed, independent women. After all, these
women would tell you to take a long walk off a short pier, or words to
that effect, if you tried to tell them what to do with their lives.
And by the way, I prefer intelligent, strong-willed, indepedent women.
I am not interested in sheep (as in weak-willed simpletons that will
blindly follow what someone says).
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
13 Oct 2004 07:27:30 AM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410121943.48e8f415@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<DcTad.310180$%n4.200651@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410102203.9ece442@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they
thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived
children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision. Despite
your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of abortion;
they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only role
the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question. Why
do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right
I did not ask anuything about right or wrong. I asked about NEED!
I was not talking about right and wrong. I was talking about rights
analogous to the right to freedom of religion and the right to freedom
of speech.
Or do you think that women do not have the right to control their own
bodies, as well as who or what uses them? Why?
to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
You always been a wimp?
I have never been a wimp. I just don't see any reason to force people
to obey me, especially with respect to their personal lives. I love
freedom and liberty too much to have any desire to force people to
follow my opinions and viewpoints.
However, you are such a weak person that you feel the need to demand
that people obey your whims to control their lives and their
decisions. That makes you shallow and pathetic.
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
No need for it.
Yes there is.
Men need abortions?
If you know of any other way to end an unwanted
pregnancy without forcing the woman to endure months of pregnancy as
well as a torturous labor, let's hear it.
How do men need abortions?
I aksed about NEED.
Learn to read. It rhymes with NEED.
I did. And I answered your question. You just did not like the
answer I gave because you cannot counter it without ignoring it or
ignoring the woman's rights.
I am not ignoring women's rights.
Making a law which discriminates on the basis of gender is illegal.
If a woman does not want to remain pregnant, then she needs to end
that pregnancy. It is her body, and her preceived need that matters.
And since it is her body, her decision and her need to control the use
of her body overrides your need to make her suffer.
Are you always so long-winded?
It is her live, her body, and her choice. That is all that there is
to it. There is no reason for her to be forced to suffer the effects
of an unwanted pregnancy just to satisfy a loser like you. She has
the right and the ability to make up her own mind about her pregnancy,
and she does not need you telling her what to do and what to think.
Your desire to do so only shows what a how afraid you are of
intelligent, strong-willed, independent women. After all, these
women would tell you to take a long walk off a short pier, or words to
that effect, if you tried to tell them what to do with their lives.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!
And by the way, I prefer intelligent, strong-willed, indepedent women.
I am not interested in sheep (as in weak-willed simpletons that will
blindly follow what someone says).
You finished?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
13 Oct 2004 11:22:33 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message news:<M99bd.165127$as2.94827@bignews3.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410121943.48e8f415@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<DcTad.310180$%n4.200651@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410102203.9ece442@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they
thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived
children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision. Despite
your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of abortion;
they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only role
the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question. Why
do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right
I did not ask anuything about right or wrong. I asked about NEED!
I was not talking about right and wrong. I was talking about rights
analogous to the right to freedom of religion and the right to freedom
of speech.
Or do you think that women do not have the right to control their own
bodies, as well as who or what uses them? Why?
to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
You always been a wimp?
I have never been a wimp. I just don't see any reason to force people
to obey me, especially with respect to their personal lives. I love
freedom and liberty too much to have any desire to force people to
follow my opinions and viewpoints.
However, you are such a weak person that you feel the need to demand
that people obey your whims to control their lives and their
decisions. That makes you shallow and pathetic.
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
No need for it.
Yes there is.
Men need abortions?
If/when men can become pregnant, then they will have a need for
abortions to be freely available, just like they are for women now.
If you know of any other way to end an unwanted
pregnancy without forcing the woman to endure months of pregnancy as
well as a torturous labor, let's hear it.
How do men need abortions?
Men don't (yet), but women do. And men that actually care about women
would not try to force them to continue their pregnancies against
their wills.
I aksed about NEED.
Learn to read. It rhymes with NEED.
I did. And I answered your question. You just did not like the
answer I gave because you cannot counter it without ignoring it or
ignoring the woman's rights.
I am not ignoring women's rights.
It sure looks like it.
Making a law which discriminates on the basis of gender is illegal.
However, laws that recognize inherent physical differences are not.
For example, all the laws that deal with people that are physically
handicapped/disabled in some way.
Women have many physical differences from men. (Viva la difference!!)
A number of those differences allow women to get pregnant. There are
laws on the books that state that an employer MUST allow women
maternity leave after she gives birth. In general, men are not
elegible for maternity leave (there are some reasonable exceptions,
like the woman dies in childbirth, so he now has to take care of the
newborn.) By your reasoning, since men cannot get pregnant, women
should be denied maternity leave. Abortion laws are pretty much in
the same category of laws. The physical differences inherent in the
genders require a law that women can use, but not men. If/when men
can become pregnant, then men will be able to take edvantage of
exactly the same laws.
If a woman does not want to remain pregnant, then she needs to end
that pregnancy. It is her body, and her preceived need that matters.
And since it is her body, her decision and her need to control the use
of her body overrides your need to make her suffer.
Are you always so long-winded?
A complete explanation of my position as well as a complete answer to
your inquires facilitates the debate, as well as usually disarming the
person that I am debating. For example, you have not been able to
effectively counter anyhing that I have said in an intelligent and
reasonable manner. Instead, you have made fatuous comments and said
nothing of any relevance. Very simply, a complete evasion.
It is her live, her body, and her choice. That is all that there is
to it. There is no reason for her to be forced to suffer the effects
of an unwanted pregnancy just to satisfy a loser like you. She has
the right and the ability to make up her own mind about her pregnancy,
and she does not need you telling her what to do and what to think.
Your desire to do so only shows what a how afraid you are of
intelligent, strong-willed, independent women. After all, these
women would tell you to take a long walk off a short pier, or words to
that effect, if you tried to tell them what to do with their lives.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!
No doubt you slept a lot during school when the teacher was trying (in
vain) to educate you. You still seem to have trouble learning and
dealing with facts and the real world.
And by the way, I prefer intelligent, strong-willed, indepedent women.
I am not interested in sheep (as in weak-willed simpletons that will
blindly follow what someone says).
You finished?
Obviously, since it is the end of my post. Perhaps you should
actually read what I wrote. You might learn something. After all,
you had nothing to say of any intelligence in response to my answer to
your question. You just spouted irrelevant nonsense.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
14 Oct 2004 01:03:10 PM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410132022.16f6c9f0@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<M99bd.165127$as2.94827@bignews3.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410121943.48e8f415@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<DcTad.310180$%n4.200651@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410102203.9ece442@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they
thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived
children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision.
Despite
your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of
abortion;
they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only
role
the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that
the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question.
Why
do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right
I did not ask anuything about right or wrong. I asked about NEED!
I was not talking about right and wrong. I was talking about rights
analogous to the right to freedom of religion and the right to freedom
of speech.
Or do you think that women do not have the right to control their own
bodies, as well as who or what uses them? Why?
to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to
remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
You always been a wimp?
I have never been a wimp. I just don't see any reason to force people
to obey me, especially with respect to their personal lives. I love
freedom and liberty too much to have any desire to force people to
follow my opinions and viewpoints.
However, you are such a weak person that you feel the need to demand
that people obey your whims to control their lives and their
decisions. That makes you shallow and pathetic.
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
No need for it.
Yes there is.
Men need abortions?
If/when men can become pregnant, then they will have a need for
abortions to be freely available, just like they are for women now.
Do men need abortions?
Yes or no.
If you know of any other way to end an unwanted
pregnancy without forcing the woman to endure months of pregnancy as
well as a torturous labor, let's hear it.
How do men need abortions?
Men don't (yet), but women do.
How do you know that?
And men that actually care about women
would not try to force them to continue their pregnancies against
their wills.
Especially when those men do not want those woman to have that baby.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I aksed about NEED.
Learn to read. It rhymes with NEED.
I did. And I answered your question. You just did not like the
answer I gave because you cannot counter it without ignoring it or
ignoring the woman's rights.
I am not ignoring women's rights.
It sure looks like it.
It looks like you are avoiding the question of why do men need abortion to
be legal on demand as it is now.
Making a law which discriminates on the basis of gender is illegal.
However, laws that recognize inherent physical differences are not.
For example, all the laws that deal with people that are physically
handicapped/disabled in some way.
We are not discussing that are we?
Can you tell me why men need abortion on demand to be legal in the USA?
Women have many physical differences from men. (Viva la difference!!)
A number of those differences allow women to get pregnant. There are
laws on the books that state that an employer MUST allow women
maternity leave after she gives birth. In general, men are not
elegible for maternity leave (there are some reasonable exceptions,
like the woman dies in childbirth, so he now has to take care of the
newborn.) By your reasoning, since men cannot get pregnant, women
should be denied maternity leave. Abortion laws are pretty much in
the same category of laws. The physical differences inherent in the
genders require a law that women can use, but not men. If/when men
can become pregnant, then men will be able to take edvantage of
exactly the same laws.
My question still stands.
If a woman does not want to remain pregnant, then she needs to end
that pregnancy. It is her body, and her preceived need that matters.
And since it is her body, her decision and her need to control the use
of her body overrides your need to make her suffer.
Are you always so long-winded?
A complete explanation of my position as well as a complete answer to
your inquires facilitates the debate, as well as usually disarming the
person that I am debating. For example, you have not been able to
effectively counter anyhing that I have said in an intelligent and
reasonable manner. Instead, you have made fatuous comments and said
nothing of any relevance. Very simply, a complete evasion.
You have not answered my question.
I am not disarmed.
You have yet to answer the original question.
Why do men choose to allow abortion on demand?
It is her live, her body, and her choice. That is all that there is
to it. There is no reason for her to be forced to suffer the effects
of an unwanted pregnancy just to satisfy a loser like you. She has
the right and the ability to make up her own mind about her pregnancy,
and she does not need you telling her what to do and what to think.
Your desire to do so only shows what a how afraid you are of
intelligent, strong-willed, independent women. After all, these
women would tell you to take a long walk off a short pier, or words to
that effect, if you tried to tell them what to do with their lives.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!
No doubt you slept a lot during school when the teacher was trying (in
vain) to educate you. You still seem to have trouble learning and
dealing with facts and the real world.
I deal with facts every day.
Have you come up with an answer as to why men need abortion yet?
And by the way, I prefer intelligent, strong-willed, indepedent women.
I am not interested in sheep (as in weak-willed simpletons that will
blindly follow what someone says).
You finished?
Obviously, since it is the end of my post. Perhaps you should
actually read what I wrote. You might learn something. After all,
you had nothing to say of any intelligence in response to my answer to
your question. You just spouted irrelevant nonsense.
You still have not given a reason that men need abortion on demand.
Where is the need?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
14 Oct 2004 08:24:17 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message news:<Niybd.194$qH3.163@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410132022.16f6c9f0@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<M99bd.165127$as2.94827@bignews3.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410121943.48e8f415@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<DcTad.310180$%n4.200651@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410102203.9ece442@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they
thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived
children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision.
Despite
your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of
abortion;
they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only
role
the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that
the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question.
Why
do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right
I did not ask anuything about right or wrong. I asked about NEED!
I was not talking about right and wrong. I was talking about rights
analogous to the right to freedom of religion and the right to freedom
of speech.
Or do you think that women do not have the right to control their own
bodies, as well as who or what uses them? Why?
to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to
remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
You always been a wimp?
I have never been a wimp. I just don't see any reason to force people
to obey me, especially with respect to their personal lives. I love
freedom and liberty too much to have any desire to force people to
follow my opinions and viewpoints.
However, you are such a weak person that you feel the need to demand
that people obey your whims to control their lives and their
decisions. That makes you shallow and pathetic.
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
No need for it.
Yes there is.
Men need abortions?
If/when men can become pregnant, then they will have a need for
abortions to be freely available, just like they are for women now.
Do men need abortions?
Yes or no.
Currently, no. However, that does not prevent compassionate men from
being pro-choice. Being able to put yourself into the place of
another and trying to figure out what they feel and why they feel that
way is a positive trait that Fundamentalists seem to avoid practicing.
If you know of any other way to end an unwanted
pregnancy without forcing the woman to endure months of pregnancy as
well as a torturous labor, let's hear it.
How do men need abortions?
Men don't (yet), but women do.
How do you know that?
Because women can get pregnant. And if a woman does not want to
remain pregant, or the pregnancy has any number of serious or fatal
consequences, then an abortion is needed.
And men that actually care about women
would not try to force them to continue their pregnancies against
their wills.
Especially when those men do not want those woman to have that baby.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
However, the man does not get to control the woman or her body. If
SHE want to continue the pregnancy, then he is S.O.L.
His opinion does not count, only her's does. If he want her to
continue the pregancy and she does not want to, she is perfectly free
to get an abortion. If he wants her to get an abortion and she wants
to continue the pregnancy, then she can and he cannot do anything
about it.
The man's desires are not an issue in the decision unless the woman
want's to know what his desires are. She still controls the decision,
however.
I aksed about NEED.
Learn to read. It rhymes with NEED.
I did. And I answered your question. You just did not like the
answer I gave because you cannot counter it without ignoring it or
ignoring the woman's rights.
I am not ignoring women's rights.
It sure looks like it.
It looks like you are avoiding the question of why do men need abortion to
be legal on demand as it is now.
Because they care about women, and do not wish to control them. Men
that respect and care for women want them to be free to make their own
decisions and to be happy. Men that respect and care for women do not
feel the need to control women and to force them to suffer.
A young, non-disabled, white, Christian, male does not need any of the
civil rights laws, but that does not prevent him from seeing the need
for them. Just because a law does not affect you directly does not
mean that you cannot see the need for that law to be in place.
There are some people that place the needs of others above their own
desires. Apparently, you are not one of those people.
Making a law which discriminates on the basis of gender is illegal.
However, laws that recognize inherent physical differences are not.
For example, all the laws that deal with people that are physically
handicapped/disabled in some way.
We are not discussing that are we?
Actually, we are by analogy. Laws that permit women to get abortion
recognize their inherent physical differences.
Can you tell me why men need abortion on demand to be legal in the USA?
Because they care about the women in their lives, and about women in
general.
Women have many physical differences from men. (Viva la difference!!)
A number of those differences allow women to get pregnant. There are
laws on the books that state that an employer MUST allow women
maternity leave after she gives birth. In general, men are not
elegible for maternity leave (there are some reasonable exceptions,
like the woman dies in childbirth, so he now has to take care of the
newborn.) By your reasoning, since men cannot get pregnant, women
should be denied maternity leave. Abortion laws are pretty much in
the same category of laws. The physical differences inherent in the
genders require a law that women can use, but not men. If/when men
can become pregnant, then men will be able to take edvantage of
exactly the same laws.
My question still stands.
Answered, if you would actually read for comprehension.
If a woman does not want to remain pregnant, then she needs to end
that pregnancy. It is her body, and her preceived need that matters.
And since it is her body, her decision and her need to control the use
of her body overrides your need to make her suffer.
Are you always so long-winded?
A complete explanation of my position as well as a complete answer to
your inquires facilitates the debate, as well as usually disarming the
person that I am debating. For example, you have not been able to
effectively counter anyhing that I have said in an intelligent and
reasonable manner. Instead, you have made fatuous comments and said
nothing of any relevance. Very simply, a complete evasion.
You have not answered my question.
Yes I did.
I am not disarmed.
Yes, you are. You cannot counter my points.
You have yet to answer the original question.
Why do men choose to allow abortion on demand?
Because they care about women in general and the specific women in
their lives, and they realize that women have the right to control
their own bodies.
It is her live, her body, and her choice. That is all that there is
to it. There is no reason for her to be forced to suffer the effects
of an unwanted pregnancy just to satisfy a loser like you. She has
the right and the ability to make up her own mind about her pregnancy,
and she does not need you telling her what to do and what to think.
Your desire to do so only shows what a how afraid you are of
intelligent, strong-willed, independent women. After all, these
women would tell you to take a long walk off a short pier, or words to
that effect, if you tried to tell them what to do with their lives.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!
No doubt you slept a lot during school when the teacher was trying (in
vain) to educate you. You still seem to have trouble learning and
dealing with facts and the real world.
I deal with facts every day.
By apparently disregarding them.
Have you come up with an answer as to why men need abortion yet?
I have, several times.
And by the way, I prefer intelligent, strong-willed, indepedent women.
I am not interested in sheep (as in weak-willed simpletons that will
blindly follow what someone says).
You finished?
Obviously, since it is the end of my post. Perhaps you should
actually read what I wrote. You might learn something. After all,
you had nothing to say of any intelligence in response to my answer to
your question. You just spouted irrelevant nonsense.
You still have not given a reason that men need abortion on demand.
Where is the need?
Women get pregnant, and do not wish to be pregnant. Therefore, they
need to end the pregnancy as soon as possible. The only known way to
do that is to get an abortion. Men that care about women do not wish
to force women to endure unwanted pregnancies, because then the men
suffer because the women that they care about suffer. (It is called
empathy, something that you seem to lack.)
There is the need. People that care about other people want to see
that people are happy and treated fairly, and not force to suffer
unnecessarily. Forcing a woman to endure an unwanted pregnancy is
forcing her to suffer unnecessarily.
Apparently, you have no problem with forcing women to suffer
unnecessarilty.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
15 Oct 2004 08:29:55 AM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410141724.1d258f1f@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<Niybd.194$qH3.163@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410132022.16f6c9f0@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<M99bd.165127$as2.94827@bignews3.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410121943.48e8f415@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<DcTad.310180$%n4.200651@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410102203.9ece442@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was
they
thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting
conceived
children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision.
Despite
your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of
abortion;
they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only
role
the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure
that
the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and
licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question.
Why
do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right
I did not ask anuything about right or wrong. I asked about NEED!
I was not talking about right and wrong. I was talking about rights
analogous to the right to freedom of religion and the right to
freedom
of speech.
Or do you think that women do not have the right to control their
own
bodies, as well as who or what uses them? Why?
to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to
remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
You always been a wimp?
I have never been a wimp. I just don't see any reason to force
people
to obey me, especially with respect to their personal lives. I love
freedom and liberty too much to have any desire to force people to
follow my opinions and viewpoints.
However, you are such a weak person that you feel the need to demand
that people obey your whims to control their lives and their
decisions. That makes you shallow and pathetic.
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
No need for it.
Yes there is.
Men need abortions?
If/when men can become pregnant, then they will have a need for
abortions to be freely available, just like they are for women now.
Do men need abortions?
Yes or no.
Currently, no. However, that does not prevent compassionate men from
being pro-choice. Being able to put yourself into the place of
another and trying to figure out what they feel and why they feel that
way is a positive trait that Fundamentalists seem to avoid practicing.
Why do men need abortions then?
Try your stance about compassion and putting yourself in their place and
then answer the question about why men need abortion.
I see no compassion on the part of men in allowing women to have abortions.
I see no compassion in it.
If you know of any other way to end an unwanted
pregnancy without forcing the woman to endure months of pregnancy as
well as a torturous labor, let's hear it.
How do men need abortions?
Men don't (yet), but women do.
How do you know that?
Because women can get pregnant.
Men do not need abortions, you say?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
And if a woman does not want to
remain pregant, or the pregnancy has any number of serious or fatal
consequences, then an abortion is needed.
Are you female?
And men that actually care about women
would not try to force them to continue their pregnancies against
their wills.
Especially when those men do not want those woman to have that baby.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
However, the man does not get to control the woman or her body. If
SHE want to continue the pregnancy, then he is S.O.L.
You like females running your life?
His opinion does not count, only her's does. If he want her to
continue the pregancy and she does not want to, she is perfectly free
to get an abortion. If he wants her to get an abortion and she wants
to continue the pregnancy, then she can and he cannot do anything
about it.
A real pisser.
The man's desires are not an issue in the decision unless the woman
want's to know what his desires are. She still controls the decision,
however.
You are very much a wimp, a coward, and an unfriendly person to your fellow
men in the USA.
I asked about NEED.
Learn to read. It rhymes with NEED.
I did. And I answered your question. You just did not like the
answer I gave because you cannot counter it without ignoring it or
ignoring the woman's rights.
I am not ignoring women's rights.
It sure looks like it.
It looks like you are avoiding the question of why do men need abortion
to
be legal on demand as it is now.
Because they care about women, and do not wish to control them.
*****!
They do not really love them.
Men
that respect and care for women want them to be free to make their own
decisions and to be happy.
*****!
Not evidenced by Pro-Choicers.
Men that respect and care for women do not
feel the need to control women and to force them to suffer.
*****!
Pro-Choice is control by force.
A young, non-disabled, white, Christian, male does not need any of the
civil rights laws, but that does not prevent him from seeing the need
for them. Just because a law does not affect you directly does not
mean that you cannot see the need for that law to be in place.
Why don't you give up?
Your words are so unexciting.
There are some people that place the needs of others above their own
desires. Apparently, you are not one of those people.
Pro-Choicers place their own needs above the needs of others.
So do whores and pimps.
Making a law which discriminates on the basis of gender is illegal.
However, laws that recognize inherent physical differences are not.
For example, all the laws that deal with people that are physically
handicapped/disabled in some way.
We are not discussing that are we?
Actually, we are by analogy. Laws that permit women to get abortion
recognize their inherent physical differences.
They attack them.
Can you tell me why men need abortion on demand to be legal in the USA?
Because they care about the women in their lives, and about women in
general.
I disagree.
Women have many physical differences from men. (Viva la difference!!)
A number of those differences allow women to get pregnant. There are
laws on the books that state that an employer MUST allow women
maternity leave after she gives birth. In general, men are not
elegible for maternity leave (there are some reasonable exceptions,
like the woman dies in childbirth, so he now has to take care of the
newborn.) By your reasoning, since men cannot get pregnant, women
should be denied maternity leave. Abortion laws are pretty much in
the same category of laws. The physical differences inherent in the
genders require a law that women can use, but not men. If/when men
can become pregnant, then men will be able to take edvantage of
exactly the same laws.
My question still stands.
Answered, if you would actually read for comprehension.
Not yet.
You answer with lies.
If you truly love a woman you do not want her to have an abortion and you do
not deny her care when she is pregnant.
You support both her and the child in such cases.
Otherwise, you are proven to be a very unloving and selfish type.
If a woman does not want to remain pregnant, then she needs to end
that pregnancy. It is her body, and her preceived need that
matters.
And since it is her body, her decision and her need to control the
use
of her body overrides your need to make her suffer.
Are you always so long-winded?
A complete explanation of my position as well as a complete answer to
your inquires facilitates the debate, as well as usually disarming the
person that I am debating. For example, you have not been able to
effectively counter anyhing that I have said in an intelligent and
reasonable manner. Instead, you have made fatuous comments and said
nothing of any relevance. Very simply, a complete evasion.
You have not answered my question.
Yes I did.
You answered very badly.
You do not pass my class.
I am not disarmed.
Yes, you are. You cannot counter my points.
I can every time.
I can and I do.
I am not of your mind or your lackluster ideology.
You have yet to answer the original question.
Why do men choose to allow abortion on demand?
Because they care about women in general and the specific women in
their lives, and they realize that women have the right to control
their own bodies.
*****!
I know you are a liar now.
It is her live, her body, and her choice. That is all that there is
to it. There is no reason for her to be forced to suffer the
effects
of an unwanted pregnancy just to satisfy a loser like you. She has
the right and the ability to make up her own mind about her
pregnancy,
and she does not need you telling her what to do and what to think.
Your desire to do so only shows what a how afraid you are of
intelligent, strong-willed, independent women. After all, these
women would tell you to take a long walk off a short pier, or words
to
that effect, if you tried to tell them what to do with their lives.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!
No doubt you slept a lot during school when the teacher was trying (in
vain) to educate you. You still seem to have trouble learning and
dealing with facts and the real world.
I deal with facts every day.
By apparently disregarding them.
Have you come up with an answer as to why men need abortion yet?
I have, several times.
No you didn't.
All your answers contain something about women in them.
Nothing to say why the MAN WOULD NEED the abortion.
Why, in reality, without relying on a woman, would any man NEED an abortion?
And by the way, I prefer intelligent, strong-willed, indepedent
women.
I am not interested in sheep (as in weak-willed simpletons that will
blindly follow what someone says).
You finished?
Obviously, since it is the end of my post. Perhaps you should
actually read what I wrote. You might learn something. After all,
you had nothing to say of any intelligence in response to my answer to
your question. You just spouted irrelevant nonsense.
You still have not given a reason that men need abortion on demand.
Where is the need?
Women
You did it again. The first word you typed when I asked about men was
"women".
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
15 Oct 2004 08:17:55 AM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410121943.48e8f415@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<DcTad.310180$%n4.200651@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0410102203.9ece442@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<pxn9d.299118$%n4.243939@bignews6.bellsouth.net>...
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-113D1A.22012407102004@news-40.giganews.com...
In article <VOb9d.290853$%n4.44340@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they
thought
was
best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society need women aborting conceived
children?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Perhaps you should actually read the Roe v. Wade decision. Despite
your
misconception, the judges did not decide on the issue of abortion;
they
simply said it was none of the government's business. The only role
the
government has in the practice of abortion is to make sure that the
doctors who perform abortions are properly trained and licensed.
And in response to your last question, I ask another question. Why
do
men need to ban abortion?
Why do women or men need abortion?
Please tell me why it is NECESSARY!
Because a woman has the right
I did not ask anything about right or wrong. I asked about NEED!
I was not talking about right and wrong. I was talking about rights
analogous to the right to freedom of religion and the right to freedom
of speech.
You are avoiding the question.
Or do you think that women do not have the right to control their own
bodies, as well as who or what uses them? Why?
You are still avoiding the question.
to control her own body, as well as who
or what has use of it. And "permission" to use her body can be
withdrawn at any time. Therefore, if a woman does not want to remain
pregnant, it is not right to force her to continue her pregnancy
against her will. Her life, her body, her choice.
You always been a wimp?
I have never been a wimp.
I diagree.
I just don't see any reason to force people
to obey me, especially with respect to their personal lives. I love
freedom and liberty too much to have any desire to force people to
follow my opinions and viewpoints.
Abortion uses FORCE.
I don't.
However, you are such a weak person that you feel the need to demand
that people obey your whims to control their lives and their
decisions. That makes you shallow and pathetic.
I am stronger than you.
When men can become pregnant, they will enjoy this same right.
No need for it.
Yes there is.
Men need abortions?
If you know of any other way to end an unwanted
pregnancy without forcing the woman to endure months of pregnancy as
well as a torturous labor, let's hear it.
Men need abortions?
I aksed about NEED.
Learn to read. It rhymes with NEED.
I did. And I answered your question. You just did not like the
answer I gave because you cannot counter it without ignoring it or
ignoring the woman's rights.
Ignore women's rights for a moment and answer the question about why men
need abortion.
If a woman does not want to remain pregnant, then she needs to end
that pregnancy. It is her body, and her preceived need that matters.
And since it is her body, her decision and her need to control the use
of her body overrides your need to make her suffer.
Stop concentrating on women and answer the question.
It is her live, her body, and her choice. That is all that there is
to it. There is no reason for her to be forced to suffer the effects
of an unwanted pregnancy just to satisfy a loser like you. She has
the right and the ability to make up her own mind about her pregnancy,
and she does not need you telling her what to do and what to think.
Your desire to do so only shows what a how afraid you are of
intelligent, strong-willed, independent women. After all, these
women would tell you to take a long walk off a short pier, or words to
that effect, if you tried to tell them what to do with their lives.
And by the way, I prefer intelligent, strong-willed, indepedent women.
I am not interested in sheep (as in weak-willed simpletons that will
blindly follow what someone says).
You are failing this test.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 10:42:54 PM |
|
|
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide what was they thought was
best for women?
They didn't, lunatic. They ruled that women get to decide for
themselves without having to listen to women-hating lunatics like
you who want to kill them.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 09:21:17 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:49:07 -0500,
Hateful Bigot & All-around LOSER, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide
what was they thought was best for women?
Because they had the same quality of humanitarianism that the
majority of those on the Court had been manifesting for decades
before then, and have ever since. It was the same Court (then
all-white) that triggered the beginning of the end for segregation (a
form of bigotry against blacks that was akin to the Anti-Choicers'
bigotry toward women, and the homophobes' bigotry against gays,
today) in their "Brown vs. board of Education" ruling 50 years ago,
in 1954.
In 1973, they emancipated all of America's fertile and to-become-
fertile girls and women with it's landmark Roe vs. Wade ruling -- the
best act of emancipation since 1865.
In 1967, they struck down the remaining hateful and ludicrous laws
against interracial marriage. (And I'm betting that by 2006, they'll
do the same for all same-sex couples.)
In 2003, the Cour showed fairness and respect for privacy of its
citizens by sensibly kicking government OUT of *all* of America's
bedrooms.
Steadily and inexorably, America is leaving ALL forms of mindless
bigotry behind. And we have the forward-thinking, intelligent, and
compassionate U.S. Supreme Court (and those of some of the
progressive states, like Massachusetts) to thank for MUCH of that,
with their fair and legitimate rulings per judicial review and the
Constitution's system of checks-and-balances.
Why do men need the right to choose?
They don't -- any more than whites needed to be intergrated, in
1965. But FAIR and **compassionate** whites SUPPORTED the
blacks in gaining their emancipation from hateful segregation.
Too bad fairness is ALIEN to you.
Why does a male-dominated society...
...support the right of women to choose between the remedy of
abortion, and gestating to term? Because the vast majority of males,
just like the vast majority of ALL people, in America, are humani-
tarians, egalitarians, fair, and sensible. UNLIKE the hateful bigots
who are moronic enough to BE Anti-Choicers.
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
They don't. But most of us are FAIR enough to be supportive
of the women who DO.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(The crazed laugh emanating from Wentzky's rubber room...)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Kerry -- two medals: a silver and bronze star.
Bush? Well -- they don't give medals for
going AWOL, missing your medical and
getting grounded or falling off of a bar stool.
Kerry -- a hero, Bush -- a zero.
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening...
The Bush 'economic' policy: - 3 million jobs and counting...
The Bush Iraq lie: - 1,052 GIs, and mounting...
Having Bush louse up my country: Worthless
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 02:47:58 PM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4168508a.4502089@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:49:07 -0500,
Fair-minded, true egalitarian and all-around WINNER!, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide
what was they thought was best for women?
Why do men need the right to choose?
Why does a male-dominated society...
...support the right of women to choose between the remedy of
abortion, and gestating to term?
Good question. See the irresponsibility inherent in the Pro-Choice plan now?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Why are some men for it then, as you are?
And, again, do not rely on women for your answer.
Speak like a man for men and do not backtrack to an argument tha relies on
femininity.
They don't.
Gender bias.
But most of us are FAIR enough to be supportive
of the women who DO.
Why would they need it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pangur Ban" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 07:41:58 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4168508a.4502089@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:49:07 -0500,
Fair-minded, true egalitarian and all-around
WINNER!, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973
decide what was they thought was best for
women? Why do men need the right to
choose? Why does a male-dominated
society...
...support the right of women to choose
between the remedy of abortion, and gestating
to term?
Good question. See the irresponsibility
inherent in the Pro-Choice plan now?
And just what is wrong with having free will?
Free will is the right to choose - and that choice
of abortion or bearing to term
is between a woman and her god .
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Why are some men for it then, as you are?
And, again, do not rely on women for your
answer. Speak like a man for men and do not
backtrack to an argument tha relies on
femininity.
Speak like a man for men? Gimme a break!!! What
is wrong with an argument based on femininity?
Women are approximately half (if not more
considering how men enjoy killing each other) of
the human population. Their opinions, beliefs,
and arguments are just as valid as a man's.
They don't.
Gender bias.
But most of us are FAIR enough to be
supportive of the women who DO.
Why would they need it?
ROFL!!!!!! How long have women had the right to
vote? To have a say in the government which
supposedly represents ALL the people? To own
property (and not BE property)? To sue for
divorce? To openly run a business without needing
a male figurehead? To have ANY say in what
happens to their bodies?
Compare that time period with the time period
women have existed.
How long have men had those same rights? Make the
same comparison with how long they have existed?
Do you find any inequality? And you dare ask why
women still (sadly) need the aid of supportive men?
Pangur
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 09:35:09 PM |
|
|
"Pangur Ban" <Pangur-Ban@SatisHouse.org> wrote in message
news:qnl9d.675427$Gx4.581345@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Johnny wrote:
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4168508a.4502089@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:49:07 -0500, Fair-minded, true egalitarian and
all-around
WINNER!, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973
decide what was they thought was best for
women? Why do men need the right to
choose? Why does a male-dominated
society...
...support the right of women to choose between the remedy of abortion,
and gestating
to term?
Good question. See the irresponsibility inherent in the Pro-Choice plan
now?
And just what is wrong with having free will?
Free will is the right to choose - and that choice
of abortion or bearing to term
is between a woman and her god .
Her God being a liar and a deceiver?
I am sick of witnessing the falling away of the nation's women and the men
who are taking part with the women who are pulling them into it.
God cursed woman and the earth after the woman was deceived in the garden of
Eden.
Men were not cursed except to sweat maybe.
Men will rule, and God can curse even more if He so desires.
I would not test His patience any longer in this area.
As a matter of fact, I never did.
I never fell to the lie, the deception of Pro-Choice, that allows the
transgressing of the very basic commandment which forbids killing.
Are you guilty?
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Why are some men for it then, as you are?
And, again, do not rely on women for your answer. Speak like a man for
men and do not backtrack to an argument tha relies on femininity.
Speak like a man for men? Gimme a break!!! What
is wrong with an argument based on femininity?
It shows absolutely nothing about the male psyche in this area.
Are you effiminate or are you masculine?
Women are approximately half (if not more
considering how men enjoy killing each other) of
the human population. Their opinions, beliefs,
and arguments are just as valid as a man's.
Not always true.
They don't.
Gender bias.
But most of us are FAIR enough to be supportive of the women who DO.
Why would they need it?
ROFL!!!!!! How long have women had the right to
vote?
They had the right to vote in 1973, yet they were not given the opportunity.
To have a say in the government which
supposedly represents ALL the people? To own
property (and not BE property)? To sue for
divorce? To openly run a business without needing
a male figurehead? To have ANY say in what
happens to their bodies?
That is gender bias though in the abortion area.
Civil Rights legislation forbids discrimination on the basis of gender.
You think Martin Luther King, Jr.'s death was in vain?
Compare that time period with the time period women have existed.
I did already. Women did not get to vote on Roe V Wade in 1973.
How long have men had those same rights? Make the same comparison with
how long they have existed?
Already did.
Why didn't you follow through as I did?
Why do you exalt what has been proven to be an unrepresentative decision?
Do you find any inequality? And you dare ask why women still (sadly) need
the aid of supportive men?
I do find inequality and I find a violation of Civil Rights legislation.
Sex discrimination in law.
Too bad they are not getting it now like they did before 1973.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pangur Ban" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 09:12:39 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pangur Ban" <Pangur-Ban@SatisHouse.org> wrote
in message
news:qnl9d.675427$Gx4.581345@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Johnny wrote:
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4168508a.4502089@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:49:07 -0500,
Fair-minded, true egalitarian and
all-around WINNER!, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of
1973 decide what was they thought was
best for women? Why do men need the
right to choose? Why does a
male-dominated society...
...support the right of women to choose
between the remedy of abortion, and
gestating to term?
Good question. See the irresponsibility
inherent in the Pro-Choice plan now?
And just what is wrong with having free will?
Free will is the right to choose - and that
choice of abortion or bearing to term is
between a woman and her god .
Her God being a liar and a deceiver?
Do not christians believe in free will? The right
to make choices in their lives? Are those choices
not between them and their god? Or does that only
apply to men?
I am sick of witnessing the falling away of the
nation's women
Yes, yes. I know. Life was so much better when a
man was able to handle all the money, make all the
decisions, and keep their wives barefoot and
pregnant (till their wives died of perpetual
chidbearing - which then allowed the old farts to
marry another, younger wife). Ah, the good old
days.
and the men who are taking part with the women
who are pulling them into it.
Oh, yes - here is the old canard.....women are
deceitful manipulating creatures - responsible for
all the evil in the world.
God cursed woman and the earth after the woman
was deceived in the garden of Eden.
*****.
Men were not cursed except to sweat maybe.
They certainly weren't cursed with having to bear
children...... if they had been the human race
would have become extinct long ago.
Men will rule, and God can curse even more if
He so desires.
ROFL
I would not test His patience any longer in
this area.
Good - then don't.
As a matter of fact, I never did.
Good - keep it that way.
I never fell to the lie, the deception of
Pro-Choice, that allows the transgressing of
the very basic commandment which forbids
killing. Are you guilty?
None of your business..... LOL
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
Why are some men for it then, as you are?
And, again, do not rely on women for your
answer. Speak like a man for men and do not
backtrack to an argument tha relies on
femininity.
Speak like a man for men? Gimme a break!!!
What is wrong with an argument based on
femininity?
It shows absolutely nothing about the male
psyche in this area.
And the opposite is true of an argument based on
the male psyche.....the feminine is omitted. But
then that is nothing new.
Are you effiminate or are you masculine?
None of your business. LOL
Women are approximately half (if not more
considering how men enjoy killing each other)
of the human population. Their opinions,
beliefs, and arguments are just as valid as a
man's.
Not always true.
More often than a man's is as valid as a woman's.
They don't.
Gender bias.
But most of us are FAIR enough to be
supportive of the women who DO.
Why would they need it?
ROFL!!!!!! How long have women had the right
to vote?
*sigh* In the US they have had the right for some
80+ years - since 1920.
They had the right to vote in 1973, yet they
were not given the opportunity.
To have a say in the government which
supposedly represents ALL the people? To own
property (and not BE property)? To sue for
divorce? To openly run a business without
needing a male figurehead? To have ANY say
in what happens to their bodies?
That is gender bias though in the abortion
area. Civil Rights legislation forbids
discrimination on the basis of gender. You
think Martin Luther King, Jr.'s death was in
vain?
HUH? Non sequiter.
Compare that time period with the time period
women have existed.
80+ years compared to 130,000 years.
I did already. Women did not get to vote on Roe
V Wade in 1973.
How long have men had those same rights?
Make the same comparison with how long they
have existed?
Already did. Why didn't you follow through as I
did? Why do you exalt what has been proven to
be an unrepresentative decision?
Do you find any inequality? And you dare ask
why women still (sadly) need the aid of
supportive men?
I do find inequality and I find a violation of
Civil Rights legislation. Sex discrimination in
law.
If men want to have abortions, let them. If they
don't want to have abortions, they don't have to
do so.
They also have no right to make the decision for
someone else - male or female.
Too bad they are not getting it now like they
did before 1973.
I have concluded that you are either a troll - or
a cretin. Either way - your posts have been aborted.
Pangur
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 05:39:25 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:47:58 -0500,
Hateful Bigot & All-around LOSER, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide
what was they thought was best for women?
Because they had the same quality of humanitarianism that the
majority of those on the Court had been manifesting for decades
before then, and have ever since. It was the same Court (then
all-white) that triggered the beginning of the end for segregation (a
form of bigotry against blacks that was akin to the Anti-Choicers'
bigotry toward women, and the homophobes' bigotry against gays,
today) in their "Brown vs. board of Education" ruling 50 years ago,
in 1954.
In 1973, they emancipated all of America's fertile and to-become-
fertile girls and women with it's landmark Roe vs. Wade ruling -- the
best act of emancipation since 1865.
In 1967, they struck down the remaining hateful and ludicrous laws
against interracial marriage. (And I'm betting that by 2006, they'll
do the same for all same-sex couples.)
In 2003, the Cour showed fairness and respect for privacy of its
citizens by sensibly kicking government OUT of *all* of America's
bedrooms.
Steadily and inexorably, America is leaving ALL forms of mindless
bigotry behind. And we have the forward-thinking, intelligent, and
compassionate U.S. Supreme Court (and those of some of the
progressive states, like Massachusetts) to thank for MUCH of that,
with their fair and legitimate rulings per judicial review and the
Constitution's system of checks-and-balances.
Why do men need the right to choose?
They don't -- any more than whites needed to be intergrated, in
1965. But FAIR and **compassionate** whites SUPPORTED the
blacks in gaining their emancipation from hateful segregation.
Too bad fairness is ALIEN to you.
Why does a male-dominated society...
...support the right of women to choose between the remedy of
abortion, and gestating to term? Because the vast majority of males,
just like the vast majority of ALL people, in America, are humani-
tarians, egalitarians, fair, and sensible. UNLIKE the hateful bigots
who are moronic enough to BE Anti-Choicers.
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
They don't. But most of us are FAIR enough to be supportive
of the women who DO.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Kerry -- two medals: a silver and bronze star.
Bush? Well -- they don't give medals for
going AWOL, missing your medical and
getting grounded or falling off of a bar stool.
Kerry -- a hero, Bush -- a zero.
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening...
The Bush 'economic' policy: - 3 million jobs and counting...
The Bush Iraq lie: - 1,052 GIs, and mounting...
Having Bush louse up my country: Worthless
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do men need Pro-Choice? |
07 Oct 2004 09:26:34 PM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4165c53b.34379032@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:47:58 -0500,
Hateful Bigot & All-around LOSER, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Why did the all-male Supreme Court of 1973 decide
what was they thought was best for women?
Still awaiting an intelligent answer.
Why do men need the right to choose?
They don't
Hmmm. Why did they vote for it then?
Why does a male-dominated society...
...support the right of women to choose between the remedy of
abortion, and gestating to term?
Good question. Why would men support women's ability to have the fetuses the
men have a part in creatign aborted?
It shows me the the very selfish, evil, greedy, wicked, and lustful mindset
of those men who are for Pro-Choice as it is today.
Why do men need Pro-Choice?
They don't.
So, why is it legal?
If men do not need women aborting children then why are they for it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warm | | | | | | |