Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?

Science > Abortion > Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 19 of 24

Topic:	Science > Abortion
User:	"Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam"
Date:	18 Aug 2004 02:41:39 PM
Object:	Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.
If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.
John Kerry is against abortion.
John Kerry is against gay marriage.
John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.
John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.
Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?
.

User: "Snuggles"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	26 Aug 2004 03:33:56 PM

In article <txqXc.22694$_H5.686349@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"Stephen Bayzik" <stephen.bayzik@sympatico.ca> wrote:

"C Lund" <clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no> wrote in message
news:clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,

Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

And a boy is not a man. Your reply indicates you're not very logical.

And a boy does not have the same rights as a fully grown man. Just like
a foetus does not have the same rights as an infant.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Snuggles, not Shuggie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

User: "Stephen Bayzik"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	26 Aug 2004 09:13:54 PM

"Snuggles" <submit.iPkluBotlXWJNxff@spam.spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:submit.iPkluBotlXWJNxff-2D7218.16335526082004@corp.supernews.com...

In article <txqXc.22694$_H5.686349@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"Stephen Bayzik" <stephen.bayzik@sympatico.ca> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

And a boy is not a man. Your reply indicates you're not very logical.

And a boy does not have the same rights as a fully grown man. Just like
a foetus does not have the same rights as an infant.

Still have a problem my friend.
Who or what defines a "civil right".
Regardless of the Plantation owner from Virginia speaking as a pseudo
philosopher, all men are not created equal.
Certainly not Gawd? :-)
--
Stephen Bayzik
.

User: "Jason McNorton"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	26 Aug 2004 02:55:29 AM

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving? At birth? Third trimester? C Lund's choice?
.

User: "C Lund"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	27 Aug 2004 05:24:08 AM

In article <MPG.1b97536c94e15f53989898@news-40.giganews.com>,
Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net> wrote:

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving?

Good question. I don't know enough about the topic to know for sure.
But a baby starts out as a lump of cells of little interest beyond
it's potential of becoming a human being. At some point it develops
into a human baby that is "worthy of saving." And no, it's not a
sudden thing.

At birth?

Way before that.

Third trimester? C Lund's choice?

Please...
--
C Lund, www.notam02.no/~clund
.

User: "Ray Fischer"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	28 Aug 2004 02:06:28 PM

Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net> wrote:

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving? At birth? Third trimester? C Lund's choice?

You tell us? When are YOU willing to make the sacrifices needed to
keep a child alive?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Jason McNorton"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	28 Aug 2004 03:58:31 PM

In article <cgql3k$e98$1@bolt.sonic.net>,

says...

Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net> wrote:

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving? At birth? Third trimester? C Lund's choice?

You tell us? When are YOU willing to make the sacrifices needed to
keep a child alive?

As I said, this isn't one of my big issues. I think it's wrong as it
can be in most cases, but sometimes needed. I usually look at things
through a cost/benefit view, and not a moral one.
In this case, it's really tough.
.

User: "Ray Fischer"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	29 Aug 2004 01:24:16 AM

Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net> wrote:

In article <cgql3k$e98$1@bolt.sonic.net>,

says...

Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net> wrote:

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving? At birth? Third trimester? C Lund's choice?

You tell us? When are YOU willing to make the sacrifices needed to
keep a child alive?

As I said, this isn't one of my big issues. I think it's wrong as it
can be in most cases, but sometimes needed.

Then don't get an abortion.

I usually look at things
through a cost/benefit view, and not a moral one.

Abortion is bad unless you have to pay for childbirth?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	26 Aug 2004 10:02:37 AM

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:55:29 -0500,
Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net> wrote:

C. Lund wrote:

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby
worthy of saving? At birth? Third trimester? ...

That's EASY!
The only value that a reproductive entity has *before* birth is
that which is ASCRIBED to it by the woman carrying it.
AFTER birth, it's a baby, and has INTRINISIC value.
Thus, an entity that is **desired** by its host is worth saving at
ANY point during gestation. And UNwanted ones have value only
IF born, from the moment of birth on.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	26 Aug 2004 03:08:34 AM

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:55:29 -0500, Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net>
wrote:

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving? At birth? Third trimester? C Lund's choice?

When does a woman become unworthy of having the right to say who or
what uses her body? At conception?
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.

User: "Stephen Bayzik"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	26 Aug 2004 02:14:54 PM

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bj6ri09hhjmu0kh47037braaolkr19fk34@4ax.com...

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:55:29 -0500, Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net>
wrote:

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

<snip>

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving? At birth? Third trimester? C Lund's choice?

When does a woman become unworthy of having the right to say who or
what uses her body? At conception?

For either male or female - when the state defines or ristricts "civil
rights". Don't throw around that Constitution or Jefferson "crap". When are
you boys going to get over those juvenile civics lessons and try to live in
a real world?
--
Stephen Bayzik
.

User: "Jason McNorton"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	26 Aug 2004 03:43:02 AM

In article <bj6ri09hhjmu0kh47037braaolkr19fk34@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:55:29 -0500, Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net>
wrote:

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving? At birth? Third trimester? C Lund's choice?

When does a woman become unworthy of having the right to say who or
what uses her body? At conception?

I don't know for sure. But, when one has a paired genetic host inside
them, they should probably treat it with more respect than any half
genetic egg or sperm.
.

User: "Adam H."
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	26 Aug 2004 09:51:57 AM

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 03:43:02 -0500, Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net>
wrote:

In article <bj6ri09hhjmu0kh47037braaolkr19fk34@4ax.com>,
adam@mailinator.com says...

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:55:29 -0500, Jason McNorton <jmcno@comcast.net>
wrote:

In article <clund-8DB264.09483326082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <Xns9550D6E584B6DPQ@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Amazing the lengths the left will go to justify infanticide.

A foetus is not an infant.

I'm not big on abortion, but just when does it become a baby worthy of
saving? At birth? Third trimester? C Lund's choice?

When does a woman become unworthy of having the right to say who or
what uses her body? At conception?

I don't know for sure. But, when one has a paired genetic host inside
them, they should probably treat it with more respect than any half
genetic egg or sperm.

Most do. Having an abortion is almost invariably done after due
consideration.
But the presence of a fetus should never trump the woman's rights, and
cannot do so in a way that cannot be considered for women who are not
pregnant.
---
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,
and so are we. They never stop thinking about
new ways to harm our country and our people,
and neither do we."
President George W. Bush.
.

User: "Gactimus"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	18 Aug 2004 09:16:24 PM

(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) wrote in
news:41250531.1258874@netnews.mchsi.com:

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:55:17 GMT, Steve Mackay
<steve_mackay@hotmail.com> wrote:

George Graves wrote:

C Lund wrote:

[ ... ]

Sorry, but that's just wrong. The single pillar of Liberalism is
"live and let live". Nothing more.

Sorry, but the US liberal's platform does not reflect that in any
way shape or form.

Live and let live, LOL! If that was the case, we wouldn't have been
hearing the liberals whine for the past 4 years about GWB "stealing"
the election.

ROTFL!!!!!

He and his dishonest cronies and thugs BLATANTLY stole it.

Yeah right. The fiasco in Florida where Democrats tried multiple times to
overturn the election and in each case lost, but then still claim that the
election was stolen from them.
.

User: "forge"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	18 Aug 2004 11:06:22 PM

In article <Xns9549E31FCFBB4G@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Yeah right. The fiasco in Florida where Democrats tried multiple times to
overturn the election and in each case lost, but then still claim that the
election was stolen from them.

Except y'know, the evidence says exactly the opposite, and you have
exactly jack from any reputable source to back up that tripe.
.

User: "Psalm 110"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	19 Aug 2004 05:20:07 AM

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:16:24 GMT, Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

the
election was stolen

5 boats went out, 5 officers on them. One came back with a hole in it
to explain.
The SwiftLiars gave their reports on the day of the incident. Kerry
towed one disabled craft home so we know they arrived at base
together. If they LIED THAT DAY, that is the lie they are stuck with.
If they TOLD THE TRUTH THAT DAY then they lied in their ads. Either
way you have liars. Look at their records first. What did they say on
the day they made their reports.
Why aren't they releasing their records?
We have established these are FELONY FRAUD LIARS. Now look at the
records of everybody else involved in this FELONY FRAUD. Look at
Merrie Spaeth whose thankfully dead husband, Tex Lezar, ran on the
same ticket that got GWB the governors mansion in Texas. This guy's
name is on a NCPA list on the internet with six known organized crime
felon's who specialize in FRAUD of the body politic. Don't know who
Spaeth is? She was a 'Monica', a whitehouse fellow, in the same
building where Nancy Reagan used to sneak off to the Lincoln bedroom
with Frank Sinatra. She also is the organizer of the first wave of
publicity for these FELONY FRAUD SWIFT BOAT ORGANIZED CRIME OPERATORS.
Demand Spaeth's records. Demand Lezar's records. Demand the
Lezar-Spaeth crime family friend's records.
There's a whole lot of records that Bob Perry is going to be
producing. Every federal and state agency will be on him like stink on
*****, making him produce records. You don't fund a CRIME OPERATION and
walk into the sunset whistling Dixie. Spaeth, and all, did a hatchet
job on McCain and robbed the republican party of his candidacy, but
they tangled with tougher meat than they know how to chew now.
Demand Bob Perry's records.
You want records. I'll release records. Read 'em and weep... Your
whole stinking organized crime network laid out so that even dumbfuk
jurors can follow without any shadow of a doubt.
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Koctopus_01.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Killer_David_Koch.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/CSE_Organized_Crime.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Seitz_Tobacco_Crimes.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Singer-Nightline.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Singer-1993-1994.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Singer-Seitz.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Stohrer-Singer.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Hazeltine-Singer.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Heidelberg-Appeal.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Corrupt_Sallie_Baliunas.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Walter_Williams_AdTI.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Corrupt_Richard_S_Lindzen.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/ADTI_Frauds_01.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/AdTI_Villians.htm
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Pelosi.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Becky_Norton_Dunlop_AdTI.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Confronting_AdTI.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Chrispeels.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Corrupt_Idsos.html
http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Corrupt_Fred_Michel.html
.

User: "Gactimus"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	19 Aug 2004 06:39:37 PM

Psalm 110 <Paul_Bley@Go_to_Hell.org> wrote in
news:6kv8i0pi8ejnge0c4i2foihqkvto5oaj1j@4ax.com:

Why won't Kerry release his?
.

User: "Snuggles"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	19 Aug 2004 06:54:05 PM

In article <Xns954AC7F64407BG@alaska.local>,
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:

Psalm 110 <Paul_Bley@Go_to_Hell.org> wrote in
news:6kv8i0pi8ejnge0c4i2foihqkvto5oaj1j@4ax.com:

Why won't Kerry release his?

You mean these military records:
http://www.johnkerry.com/about/john_kerry/military_records.html
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Snuggles, not Shuggie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

User: "Jason McNorton"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	18 Aug 2004 04:06:52 PM

In article <clund-B7DF27.22542518082004@amstwist00.chello.com>,
clund@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no says...

In article <gmgravesnos-9CF5EE.13142618082004@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>,
George Graves <gmgravesnos@pacbell.net> wrote:

I don't think any conservative does. Remember the twin pillars of
liberalism are fear and guilt. Whatever liberals aren't afraid of they
feel guilty about. Liberalism is the ideology of emotion.

Sorry, but that's just wrong. The single pillar of Liberalism is "live
and let live". Nothing more.

It's a bizarre mix of anarchy and strict total control.
.

User: "Shawn Hearn"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	20 Aug 2004 10:38:39 PM

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,

(Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.

If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.

John Kerry is against abortion.

John Kerry is against gay marriage.

John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.

John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.

Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know why
anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about Kerry does
not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	20 Aug 2004 10:43:03 PM

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.

If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.

John Kerry is against abortion.

John Kerry is against gay marriage.

John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.

John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.

Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know why
anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about Kerry does
not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Is he?
John Kerry
"I oppose abortion, personally,"
.... "I don't like abortion. I believe life does begin at conception."
He can't make up his mind, he keeps flipping and flopping.
Is he going to flip and flop on his stand against gay marriage too?
.

User: "David Fritzinger"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	21 Aug 2004 12:54:25 AM

In article <QOWdnYLad4gsWbvcRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.

If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.

John Kerry is against abortion.

John Kerry is against gay marriage.

John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.

John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.

Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know why
anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about Kerry does
not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Is he?

John Kerry

"I oppose abortion, personally,"

... "I don't like abortion. I believe life does begin at conception."

He can't make up his mind, he keeps flipping and flopping.
Is he going to flip and flop on his stand against gay marriage too?

Still, Kerry is pro-choice. Why do you ignore that fact? It seems you
are being more than a wee bit dishonest here, especially considering the
fact that, in another thread, you accused someone else of dishonesty.
So, I guess we can add hypocracy to your dishonesty.
--
Dave Fritzinger
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	21 Aug 2004 09:37:26 AM

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5AB7A5.19542820082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <QOWdnYLad4gsWbvcRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.

If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.

John Kerry is against abortion.

John Kerry is against gay marriage.

John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.

John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.

Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know why
anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about Kerry

does

not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Still, Kerry is pro-choice. Why do you ignore that fact?

Fact?
Sorry, but there is no evidence that it is fact. There is evidence Kerry
changes his mind like the wind.
It seems you

are being more than a wee bit dishonest here, especially considering the
fact that, in another thread, you accused someone else of dishonesty.

That is correct, that person was dishonest by accusing Bush of something he
couldn't prove.
He was dishonest. Unless you want to try and prove his accusation.
I didn't think you would want to do that.

So, I guess we can add hypocracy to your dishonesty.

At least learn to spell

--
Dave Fritzinger

User: "Pr0r3p"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	21 Aug 2004 02:49:50 PM

"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message news:<SO2dnbrVgoSKw7rcRVn-jQ@comcast.com>...

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5AB7A5.19542820082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <QOWdnYLad4gsWbvcRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.

If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.

John Kerry is against abortion.

John Kerry is against gay marriage.

John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.

John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.

Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know why
anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about Kerry

does

not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Still, Kerry is pro-choice. Why do you ignore that fact?

Fact?

Sorry, but there is no evidence that it is fact. There is evidence Kerry
changes his mind like the wind.

Asspry doesn't let the truth keep him from making an ***** of himself.

It seems you

are being more than a wee bit dishonest here, especially considering the
fact that, in another thread, you accused someone else of dishonesty.

That is correct, that person was dishonest by accusing Bush of something he
couldn't prove.
He was dishonest. Unless you want to try and prove his accusation.

More hypocrisy from the king. Asspry demands that everyone "prove"
something while he runs around making outrageous claims that he never
backs up.

I didn't think you would want to do that.

Projecting again?

So, I guess we can add hypocracy to your dishonesty.

At least learn to spell

This from the guy who spells "already" as "all ready" and can't figure
out when to use "a" and "an".

--
Dave Fritzinger

User: "Shawn Hearn"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	22 Aug 2004 08:25:36 AM

In article <SO2dnbrVgoSKw7rcRVn-jQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5AB7A5.19542820082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <QOWdnYLad4gsWbvcRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.

If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.

John Kerry is against abortion.

John Kerry is against gay marriage.

John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.

John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.

Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know why
anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about Kerry

does

not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Still, Kerry is pro-choice. Why do you ignore that fact?

Fact?

Sorry, but there is no evidence that it is fact. There is evidence Kerry
changes his mind like the wind.

It seems you

are being more than a wee bit dishonest here, especially considering the
fact that, in another thread, you accused someone else of dishonesty.

Look up Kerry's voting record on reproductive issues. You tell me than
after you actually acquaint yourself with the facts. Even Bush is
campaigning against Kerry on the issue that "Kerry is on the
wrong side of the abortion issue" and that is quoting a TV ad I saw
which was "Authorized by George W. Bush."
.

User: "David Fritzinger"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	21 Aug 2004 04:10:34 PM

In article <SO2dnbrVgoSKw7rcRVn-jQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5AB7A5.19542820082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <QOWdnYLad4gsWbvcRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.

If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.

John Kerry is against abortion.

John Kerry is against gay marriage.

John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.

John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.

Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know why
anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about Kerry

does

not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Still, Kerry is pro-choice. Why do you ignore that fact?

Fact?

Yes, fact. Look up his position.

Sorry, but there is no evidence that it is fact. There is evidence Kerry
changes his mind like the wind.

http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Kerry_Abortion.htm
Your turn...

It seems you

are being more than a wee bit dishonest here, especially considering the
fact that, in another thread, you accused someone else of dishonesty.

So, I guess we can add hypocracy to your dishonesty.

At least learn to spell

Ah, spelling flames. The last resort of the beaten.
8^)

--
Dave Fritzinger

--
Dave Fritzinger
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	21 Aug 2004 04:39:22 PM

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5983A6.11103921082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <SO2dnbrVgoSKw7rcRVn-jQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5AB7A5.19542820082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <QOWdnYLad4gsWbvcRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry

will

bring back the draft.

If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.

John Kerry is against abortion.

John Kerry is against gay marriage.

John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.

John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.

Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better

than

Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry,

even

though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know

why

anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about

Kerry

does

not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Is he?

John Kerry

"I oppose abortion, personally,"

... "I don't like abortion. I believe life does begin at

conception."

He can't make up his mind, he keeps flipping and flopping.
Is he going to flip and flop on his stand against gay marriage too?

Still, Kerry is pro-choice. Why do you ignore that fact?

Fact?

Yes, fact. Look up his position.

Sorry, but there is no evidence that it is fact. There is evidence

Kerry

changes his mind like the wind.

http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Kerry_Abortion.htm

Your turn...

Can you oppose abortion and be pro-choice?

It seems you

are being more than a wee bit dishonest here, especially considering

the

fact that, in another thread, you accused someone else of dishonesty.

That is correct, that person was dishonest by accusing Bush of something

couldn't prove.
He was dishonest. Unless you want to try and prove his accusation.
I didn't think you would want to do that.

So, I guess we can add hypocracy to your dishonesty.

At least learn to spell

Ah, spelling flames. The last resort of the beaten.

Beaten?
Oh, that is what this is all about...o.k., well nice to see where you stand.

8^)

--
Dave Fritzinger

User: "Snuggles"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	21 Aug 2004 05:00:19 PM

In article <N5WdnWRVPKRpXbrcRVn-hg@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5983A6.11103921082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <SO2dnbrVgoSKw7rcRVn-jQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5AB7A5.19542820082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <QOWdnYLad4gsWbvcRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam) wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry

will

than

Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry,

even

though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals know

why

anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about

Kerry

does

not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Is he?

John Kerry

"I oppose abortion, personally,"

... "I don't like abortion. I believe life does begin at

conception."

He can't make up his mind, he keeps flipping and flopping.
Is he going to flip and flop on his stand against gay marriage too?

Still, Kerry is pro-choice. Why do you ignore that fact?

Fact?

Yes, fact. Look up his position.

Sorry, but there is no evidence that it is fact. There is evidence

Kerry

changes his mind like the wind.

http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Kerry_Abortion.htm

Your turn...

Can you oppose abortion and be pro-choice?

Sure.... I wouldn't choose to have an abortion but I don't see anything
wrong with other women who want to have one.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Snuggles, not Shuggie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

User: "Osprey"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	21 Aug 2004 05:16:58 PM

"Snuggles" <submit.iPkluBotlXWJNxff@spam.spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:submit.iPkluBotlXWJNxff-6E8178.18001921082004@corp.supernews.com...

In article <N5WdnWRVPKRpXbrcRVn-hg@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message
news:dfritzinnospam-5983A6.11103921082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <SO2dnbrVgoSKw7rcRVn-jQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David Fritzinger" <dfritzinnospam@mac.com> wrote in message

news:dfritzinnospam-5AB7A5.19542820082004@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

In article <QOWdnYLad4gsWbvcRVn-sA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-7D4078.23383920082004@news-40.giganews.com...

In article <2de3419.0408181141.4247db14@posting.google.com>,
janklowicz24@hotmail.com (Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam)

wrote:

If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything

Kerry

will

better

than

Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry,

even

though there is no difference between them. Why?

I can't speak for stupid liberals, but intelligent liberals

know

why

anybody but Bush should be our next president. Your lie about

Kerry

does

not change that fact. Kerry is pro-choice.

Is he?

John Kerry

"I oppose abortion, personally,"

... "I don't like abortion. I believe life does begin at

conception."

He can't make up his mind, he keeps flipping and flopping.
Is he going to flip and flop on his stand against gay marriage

too?

Still, Kerry is pro-choice. Why do you ignore that fact?

Fact?

Yes, fact. Look up his position.

Sorry, but there is no evidence that it is fact. There is evidence

Kerry

changes his mind like the wind.

http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Kerry_Abortion.htm

Your turn...

Can you oppose abortion and be pro-choice?

Sure.... I wouldn't choose to have an abortion but I don't see anything
wrong with other women who want to have one.

So a person can speak out against abortion and still be pro-choice, right?
.

User: "David Fritzinger"
Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?	21 Aug 2004 08:05:05 PM