Science > Abortion > Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush?
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Me llamo Da-Veed No Mas Spam" |
| Date: |
18 Aug 2004 02:41:39 PM |
| Object: |
Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
If elected, Kerry won't end the war in Iraq. If anything Kerry will
bring back the draft.
If elected, Kerry won't get rid of the Patriot Act.
John Kerry is against abortion.
John Kerry is against gay marriage.
John Kerry supports Israel just as much as Bush does.
John Kerry is a Bonesman just like Bush.
Yet stupid-***** liberals still pretend Kerry is somehow better than
Bush. Liberals blindly insult Bush and blindly praise Kerry, even
though there is no difference between them. Why?
.
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 04:38:59 PM |
|
|
In article <Rick-AFF88B.14125719082004@news.telus.net>,
Rick G <Rick@dot.dot> wrote:
In article
<gmgravesnos-D98E24.14064019082004@newssvr14-ext.news.prodigy.com>,
George Graves <gmgravesnos@pacbell.net> wrote:
In article <BD4A3D99.5D869%snit-nospam@cableone.net>,
Snit <snit-nospam@cableone.net> wrote:
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in
a96Vc.5417$FV3.4194@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com on 8/19/04 11:17 AM:
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes,
in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting deer,
or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt deer? If
you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to eat?
I enjoy deer hash, so I hunt with a bazooka... no worries about precise
aim, so I can still hunt even while drunk...
An AK-47 is not a form of bazooka. Still no reason to allow those for
hunting.
Why not? It's ultimately just a rifle.
I'll admit that my understanding of the AK-47 comes mostly as a result
of watching a TV documentary that had Anatoly Kalashnikov meeting with
and talking to the guy (forgot his name) who designed the M-16, but I
remember that one of the design specs was that it would be easily
maintainable, at the expense of accuracy. The M-16 was designed to be
used by a professional soldier, and so was designed to require more
maintenance, but perform at a higher level, better, more accurate shots.
So, using an AK-47 for deer hunting would not be appropriate, unless you
were hoping to give the deer a sporting chance.
I had an AK47. Used to take it to the range all the time. It's not that
inaccurate. I could bench-shoot a three-inch group at 100 yards That's
certainly good enough for hunting.
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick G" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 04:43:28 PM |
|
|
In article
<gmgravesnos-7C23F3.14390019082004@newssvr14-ext.news.prodigy.com>,
George Graves <gmgravesnos@pacbell.net> wrote:
In article <Rick-AFF88B.14125719082004@news.telus.net>,
Rick G <Rick@dot.dot> wrote:
In article
<gmgravesnos-D98E24.14064019082004@newssvr14-ext.news.prodigy.com>,
George Graves <gmgravesnos@pacbell.net> wrote:
In article <BD4A3D99.5D869%snit-nospam@cableone.net>,
Snit <snit-nospam@cableone.net> wrote:
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in
a96Vc.5417$FV3.4194@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com on 8/19/04 11:17 AM:
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes,
in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting
deer,
or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt deer? If
you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to eat?
I enjoy deer hash, so I hunt with a bazooka... no worries about
precise
aim, so I can still hunt even while drunk...
An AK-47 is not a form of bazooka. Still no reason to allow those for
hunting.
Why not? It's ultimately just a rifle.
I'll admit that my understanding of the AK-47 comes mostly as a result
of watching a TV documentary that had Anatoly Kalashnikov meeting with
and talking to the guy (forgot his name) who designed the M-16, but I
remember that one of the design specs was that it would be easily
maintainable, at the expense of accuracy. The M-16 was designed to be
used by a professional soldier, and so was designed to require more
maintenance, but perform at a higher level, better, more accurate shots.
So, using an AK-47 for deer hunting would not be appropriate, unless you
were hoping to give the deer a sporting chance.
I had an AK47. Used to take it to the range all the time. It's not that
inaccurate. I could bench-shoot a three-inch group at 100 yards That's
certainly good enough for hunting.
I defer to your superior, and first-hand, knowledge.
--
Rick...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mayor of Rlyeh" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 06:55:34 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:20:57 -0700, Snit <snit-nospam@cableone.net>
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in
a96Vc.5417$FV3.4194@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com on 8/19/04 11:17 AM:
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes,
in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting deer,
or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt deer? If
you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to eat?
I enjoy deer hash, so I hunt with a bazooka... no worries about precise
aim, so I can still hunt even while drunk...
An AK-47 is not a form of bazooka. Still no reason to allow those for
hunting.
:)
Why not? The 7.62X39 is comparable in performance to the .30-30 a
common hunting round.
--
Why settle for the lesser evil?
Cthulhu for President 2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Mackay" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 02:07:25 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:55:34 +0000, Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:20:57 -0700, Snit <snit-nospam@cableone.net>
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote in
a96Vc.5417$FV3.4194@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com on 8/19/04 11:17 AM:
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes,
in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting deer,
or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt deer? If
you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to eat?
I enjoy deer hash, so I hunt with a bazooka... no worries about precise
aim, so I can still hunt even while drunk...
An AK-47 is not a form of bazooka. Still no reason to allow those for
hunting.
:)
Why not? The 7.62X39 is comparable in performance to the .30-30 a
common hunting round.
Oh come on, why let facts get in the way of a good, uneducated speculation!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 04:05:57 PM |
|
|
In article <a96Vc.5417$FV3.4194@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com>,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
David Fritzinger wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>...
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that
is) ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have
for a rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home
protection? A pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's
a chickenshit way to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes,
in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting deer,
or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt deer? If
you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to eat?
I enjoy deer hash, so I hunt with a bazooka... no worries about precise
aim, so I can still hunt even while drunk...
I like it! :-)
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 04:05:23 PM |
|
|
In article <b82925bb.0408190940.3bff69c2@posting.google.com>,
(David Fritzinger) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>...
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in many
competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting deer,
or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt deer? If
you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to eat?
Yes. Ultimately, the AK47s available for sale in the USA are simply
rifles. Each time you pull the trigger, you get one shot. One shot will
usually bring down a deer.
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edwin" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 04:23:15 PM |
|
|
George Graves wrote:
In article <b82925bb.0408190940.3bff69c2@posting.google.com>,
dfritzin@hotmail.com (David Fritzinger) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>...
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that
is) ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have
for a rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home
protection? A pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's
a chickenshit way to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes,
in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting
deer, or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt
deer? If you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to eat?
Yes. Ultimately, the AK47s available for sale in the USA are simply
rifles. Each time you pull the trigger, you get one shot. One shot
will usually bring down a deer.
For reference rent "The Deerhunter." "One shot."
--
Edwin
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 04:50:14 PM |
|
|
In article <7T8Vc.4262$Y94.2656@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
George Graves wrote:
In article <b82925bb.0408190940.3bff69c2@posting.google.com>,
dfritzin@hotmail.com (David Fritzinger) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>...
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that
is) ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have
for a rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home
protection? A pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's
a chickenshit way to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes,
in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting
deer, or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt
deer? If you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to eat?
Yes. Ultimately, the AK47s available for sale in the USA are simply
rifles. Each time you pull the trigger, you get one shot. One shot
will usually bring down a deer.
For reference rent "The Deerhunter." "One shot."
Edwin. Those were FULLY AUTOMATIC. The ones you were allowed to buy here
in the USA were not fully automatic and could not be made fully
automatic without lots of machine work and some 'left-out' parts which
were difficult to obtain. There are a number of legal guns which are
just EXACTLY like a consumer grade M-16 or AK47 such as the Ruger
Mini-14 and Ruger Mini-30 which are far easier to convert to fully
automatic than the castrated versions of either of these military
weapons. The entire assault weapon ban was, in my opinion, just a lot of
political hot-air. "We're making the world safer by outlawing assault
rifles." I'd just like to ask one of the legislators who introduced that
bill to explain to me the difference between a consumer AK47 and a Ruger
Mini-Thirty. I'll guarantee that they can't!
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edwin" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 04:58:17 PM |
|
|
George Graves wrote:
In article <7T8Vc.4262$Y94.2656@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
George Graves wrote:
In article <b82925bb.0408190940.3bff69c2@posting.google.com>,
dfritzin@hotmail.com (David Fritzinger) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>...
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past
Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever
that is) ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have
for a rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home
protection? A pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting?
That's a chickenshit way to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And
yes, in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting
deer, or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt
deer? If you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to
eat?
Yes. Ultimately, the AK47s available for sale in the USA are simply
rifles. Each time you pull the trigger, you get one shot. One shot
will usually bring down a deer.
For reference rent "The Deerhunter." "One shot."
Edwin. Those were FULLY AUTOMATIC. The ones you were allowed to buy
here in the USA were not fully automatic and could not be made fully
automatic without lots of machine work and some 'left-out' parts which
were difficult to obtain. There are a number of legal guns which are
just EXACTLY like a consumer grade M-16 or AK47 such as the Ruger
Mini-14 and Ruger Mini-30 which are far easier to convert to fully
automatic than the castrated versions of either of these military
weapons. The entire assault weapon ban was, in my opinion, just a lot
of political hot-air. "We're making the world safer by outlawing
assault rifles." I'd just like to ask one of the legislators who
introduced that bill to explain to me the difference between a
consumer AK47 and a Ruger Mini-Thirty. I'll guarantee that they can't!
Calm down, George. You said one shot would usually bring down a deer. In
the movie "The Deerhunter," they kept repeating the phrase "one shot."
I don't disagree with your position WRT to the AK47.
--
Edwin
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 08:10:32 PM |
|
|
In article <Zn9Vc.4272$Y94.2143@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
George Graves wrote:
In article <7T8Vc.4262$Y94.2656@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>,
"Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
George Graves wrote:
In article <b82925bb.0408190940.3bff69c2@posting.google.com>,
dfritzin@hotmail.com (David Fritzinger) wrote:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:<VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>...
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past
Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever
that is) ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have
for a rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home
protection? A pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting?
That's a chickenshit way to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And
yes, in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
Nice try at changing the subject. I have nothing against hunting
deer, or other animals. But, do you really need an AK-47 to hunt
deer? If you use one, will there be anything left of the deer to
eat?
Yes. Ultimately, the AK47s available for sale in the USA are simply
rifles. Each time you pull the trigger, you get one shot. One shot
will usually bring down a deer.
For reference rent "The Deerhunter." "One shot."
Edwin. Those were FULLY AUTOMATIC. The ones you were allowed to buy
here in the USA were not fully automatic and could not be made fully
automatic without lots of machine work and some 'left-out' parts which
were difficult to obtain. There are a number of legal guns which are
just EXACTLY like a consumer grade M-16 or AK47 such as the Ruger
Mini-14 and Ruger Mini-30 which are far easier to convert to fully
automatic than the castrated versions of either of these military
weapons. The entire assault weapon ban was, in my opinion, just a lot
of political hot-air. "We're making the world safer by outlawing
assault rifles." I'd just like to ask one of the legislators who
introduced that bill to explain to me the difference between a
consumer AK47 and a Ruger Mini-Thirty. I'll guarantee that they can't!
Calm down, George. You said one shot would usually bring down a deer. In
the movie "The Deerhunter," they kept repeating the phrase "one shot."
I don't disagree with your position WRT to the AK47.
Oh. Sorry.
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 01:40:21 PM |
|
|
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in many
competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and look
no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under the
heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy population
of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter Ammon" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 01:51:21 PM |
|
|
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in many
competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and look
no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under the
heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy population
of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care deeply
about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal population. I
have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 02:35:27 PM |
|
|
"Peter Ammon" <peter_ammon@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:cg5h6s$d3g$1@news.apple.com...
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection?
A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in
many
competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and look
no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under the
heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy population
of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care deeply
about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal population. I
have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
You just met one.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 02:31:52 PM |
|
|
In article <cg5h6s$d3g$1@news.apple.com>,
Peter Ammon <peter_ammon@rocketmail.com> wrote:
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in many
competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and look
no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under the
heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy population
of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care deeply
about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal population. I
have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
Typically fuzzy liberal thinking. Hunters hunt because they ENJOY IT.
The various state governments allow hunters to hunt in controlled
circumstances because it helps them with wildlife management. If they
banned hunting, the game department would have to go out and kill these
animals themselves. Many hunters are probably unaware that they are
providing the state a service and the rest likely don't care. Thing is,
they don't have to either know or care because this is a case where
differing agendas result in a mutually beneficial result.
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lloyd Parsons" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 02:51:12 PM |
|
|
In article
<gmgravesnos-C96619.12315220082004@newssvr21-ext.news.prodigy.com>,
George Graves <gmgravesnos@pacbell.net> wrote:
In article <cg5h6s$d3g$1@news.apple.com>,
Peter Ammon <peter_ammon@rocketmail.com> wrote:
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in
many
competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and look
no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under the
heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy population
of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care deeply
about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal population. I
have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
Typically fuzzy liberal thinking. Hunters hunt because they ENJOY IT.
The various state governments allow hunters to hunt in controlled
circumstances because it helps them with wildlife management. If they
banned hunting, the game department would have to go out and kill these
animals themselves. Many hunters are probably unaware that they are
providing the state a service and the rest likely don't care. Thing is,
they don't have to either know or care because this is a case where
differing agendas result in a mutually beneficial result.
There is also Ducks Unlimited, an organization that has done probably
more than anyone to manage the duck population and affect hunting rules
than any other. It has been a very successful group.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 03:31:56 PM |
|
|
In article <200820041451061108%lloydparsons@spamac.com>,
Lloyd Parsons <lloydparsons@spamac.com> wrote:
In article
<gmgravesnos-C96619.12315220082004@newssvr21-ext.news.prodigy.com>,
George Graves <gmgravesnos@pacbell.net> wrote:
In article <cg5h6s$d3g$1@news.apple.com>,
Peter Ammon <peter_ammon@rocketmail.com> wrote:
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection?
A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in
many
competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and
look
no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under the
heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy population
of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care deeply
about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal population. I
have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
Typically fuzzy liberal thinking. Hunters hunt because they ENJOY IT.
The various state governments allow hunters to hunt in controlled
circumstances because it helps them with wildlife management. If they
banned hunting, the game department would have to go out and kill these
animals themselves. Many hunters are probably unaware that they are
providing the state a service and the rest likely don't care. Thing is,
they don't have to either know or care because this is a case where
differing agendas result in a mutually beneficial result.
There is also Ducks Unlimited, an organization that has done probably
more than anyone to manage the duck population and affect hunting rules
than any other. It has been a very successful group.
Being a fan of both Donald and Daffy, I concur!
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mayor of Rlyeh" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 04:10:14 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:51:21 -0700, Peter Ammon
<peter_ammon@rocketmail.com> chose to bless us with the following
wisdom:
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in many
competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and look
no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under the
heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy population
of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care deeply
about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal population. I
have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
You need to get out more then.
--
Why settle for the lesser evil?
Cthulhu for President 2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edwin" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 04:11:19 PM |
|
|
Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:51:21 -0700, Peter Ammon
<peter_ammon@rocketmail.com> chose to bless us with the following
wisdom:
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever
that is) ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have
for a rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home
protection? A pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting?
That's a chickenshit way to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And
yes, in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and
look no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under
the heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy
population of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care
deeply about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal
population. I have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
You need to get out more then.
But be sure to wear an orange vest and cap... ;-)
--
Edwin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lloyd Parsons" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 04:17:35 PM |
|
|
In article <XNtVc.5741$FV3.5475@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com>, Edwin
<thorne25@juno.com> wrote:
Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:51:21 -0700, Peter Ammon
<peter_ammon@rocketmail.com> chose to bless us with the following
wisdom:
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever
that is) ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have
for a rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home
protection? A pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting?
That's a chickenshit way to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And
yes, in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and
look no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under
the heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy
population of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care
deeply about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal
population. I have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
You need to get out more then.
But be sure to wear an orange vest and cap... ;-)
Ain't that the truth? <G>
I don't worry as much about my boondock living brethren, but them there
city folk who only come down once a year......
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mayor of Rlyeh" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
20 Aug 2004 04:15:05 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:11:19 GMT, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> chose to
bless us with the following wisdom:
Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:51:21 -0700, Peter Ammon
<peter_ammon@rocketmail.com> chose to bless us with the following
wisdom:
George Graves wrote:
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever
that is) ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have
for a rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home
protection? A pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting?
That's a chickenshit way to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And
yes, in many competitions, rifles are used.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't
you?
No, he probably doesn't. Most liberals see hunting = guns = bad and
look no further. They don't see that controlled hunting comes under
the heading of wildlife management and is designed to keep animal
populations down to a sustainable level to insure a healthy
population of animals and to cut down on over grazing.
It's hard to swallow the idea that hunters hunt because they care
deeply about wildlife management or ensuring a healthy animal
population. I have yet to meet a hunter who fits that billing.
You need to get out more then.
But be sure to wear an orange vest and cap... ;-)
Stay away from any headgear that features antlers. 8)
--
Why settle for the lesser evil?
Cthulhu for President 2004
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "forge" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 08:05:43 AM |
|
|
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in many
competitions, rifles are used.
Well, I suppose that's all right then. Who am I to say who gets to keep
what? Contrary to what legislators seem to believe, it's not the LEGAL
owners of firearms who are the PROBLEM. Ya know?
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
Nooooo!! Not a bambi lover, although if I see someone kill something and
not take it home to eat it, I'm going to give him a knife and fork and
make him sit down and eat it right there. And thanks to the fact I carry
guns... heh... okay, joking.
Yeah, I much prefer population control to hearing reports of deer dying
for lack of good forage. The only thing that bugs me a little, is the
hunters always go for the biggest, most gorgeous deer, and that only
leaves the little weak ones to breed, which is going to be a problem if
they keep it up. Thin the herd but leave some big healthy ones so
there'll be lots more big healthy ones later. Eugenics are us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 09:38:34 AM |
|
|
"forge" <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote in message
news:forge-EA14D7.09054319082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <VrCdnWZ1WJuiB7ncRVn-gQ@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection?
A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
Some people do collect guns, and they enter competitions. And yes, in
many
competitions, rifles are used.
Well, I suppose that's all right then. Who am I to say who gets to keep
what? Contrary to what legislators seem to believe, it's not the LEGAL
owners of firearms who are the PROBLEM. Ya know?
I am a firm believer in the saying, "Guns don't kill people"
It is true.
The problem is, the people and how are we going to address that?
You can ban all kinds of things, it isn't going to stop people who have
intentions on harming others.
An unarmed deer...oh brother..are you another bambi lover?
You do realize that hunters do help the deer in the long run don't you?
Nooooo!! Not a bambi lover, although if I see someone kill something and
not take it home to eat it, I'm going to give him a knife and fork and
make him sit down and eat it right there.
Oh yea, I absolutely am in agreement with you there.
I hunt too, but not for sport.
Although the past two years going to school has curbed my hunting down to
zero.
And thanks to the fact I carry
guns... heh... okay, joking.
Yeah, I much prefer population control to hearing reports of deer dying
for lack of good forage. The only thing that bugs me a little, is the
hunters always go for the biggest, most gorgeous deer, and that only
leaves the little weak ones to breed, which is going to be a problem if
they keep it up. Thin the herd but leave some big healthy ones so
there'll be lots more big healthy ones later. Eugenics are us.
I agree. In Delaware they have promoted hunting for doe. They now require
that hunters buy tags for bucks on top of paying the fee for a hunting
license.
The deer population here in Delaware is very large.
.
|
|
|
| User: "forge" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 09:46:27 AM |
|
|
In article <cOidnQdW-ay7JrncRVn-rA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You can ban all kinds of things, it isn't going to stop people who have
intentions on harming others.
Exactly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edwin" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 12:19:22 PM |
|
|
forge wrote:
In article <cOidnQdW-ay7JrncRVn-rA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You can ban all kinds of things, it isn't going to stop people who
have intentions on harming others.
Exactly
Nukes for everyone. Yea!
--
Edwin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mayor of Rlyeh" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 12:24:28 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:19:22 GMT, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> chose to
bless us with the following wisdom:
forge wrote:
In article <cOidnQdW-ay7JrncRVn-rA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You can ban all kinds of things, it isn't going to stop people who
have intentions on harming others.
Exactly
Nukes for everyone. Yea!
I've got a few extras if you need one.
--
Why settle for the lesser evil?
Cthulhu for President 2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edwin" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 12:28:28 PM |
|
|
Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:19:22 GMT, "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com> chose to
bless us with the following wisdom:
forge wrote:
In article <cOidnQdW-ay7JrncRVn-rA@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You can ban all kinds of things, it isn't going to stop people who
have intentions on harming others.
Exactly
Nukes for everyone. Yea!
I've got a few extras if you need one.
I need a lot more than one for the 'bonfire' I have in mind...
--
Edwin
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory L. Hansen" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 09:58:42 AM |
|
|
In article <cOidnQdW-ay7JrncRVn-rA@comcast.com>,
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
I am a firm believer in the saying, "Guns don't kill people"
It is true.
Absolutely! It's those little metal things that come out of the guns that
kill people.
--
"Is that plutonium on your gums?"
"Shut up and kiss me!"
-- Marge and Homer Simpson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Graves" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 01:36:47 PM |
|
|
In article <forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
forge <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
First of all, the 'assault weapons' for sale to the public were NOT full
automatic. They had the part that allowed for automatic firing either
removed or modified to defeat that functionality. It has been illegal
for US residents to own automatic weapons since the 1930's. Secondly, an
AK47 or an M16 is a nice, interesting weapon and fun to shoot. The way
that they were sold they would fire only one round at a time, just like
my Ruger 10-22 rifle. Yet my 10-22 is legal, and an AK47 is not. Makes
loads of sense.
--
George Graves
------------------
Bush is a poor leader because he isn't very smart.
What's Kerry's excuse gonna be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mayor of Rlyeh" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 07:16:36 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:36:47 GMT, George Graves
<gmgravesnos@pacbell.net> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
In article <forge-E9DB10.08042919082004@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
forge <forge@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:
In article <1414fd53.0408182224.2e87d45b@posting.google.com>,
sneechres@yahoo.com (Sneechres) wrote:
Cite? And how pray tell would John Kerry get THAT past Congress?
I imagine the same way he got the "assault weapon" (whatever that is)
ban through congress in 1992-3 (passed 1994).
Kerry did that all by himself huh?
Tell me exactly, what need DOES Joe Sixpack Average Citizen have for a
rifle with a 30-40 round clip that'll fire full auto? Home protection? A
pump shotgun is far better for that. Hunting? That's a chickenshit way
to go up against an unarmed deer.
First of all, the 'assault weapons' for sale to the public were NOT full
automatic. They had the part that allowed for automatic firing either
removed or modified to defeat that functionality.
AK's have a different sear AIRC. The drawings for the full auto one
are readily available and easily made by any machinist.
It has been illegal
for US residents to own automatic weapons since the 1930's.
Actually it was never made illegal. Its not illegal now. You have to
pass a background screening by the FBI and a few other things that
will cost you $500 the last time I looked into it but it can be done.
George Bush the Elder made some changes to the process that made it a
lot harder to get one which is one of the reasons I didn't vote for
the SOB.
Secondly, an AK47 or an M16 is a nice, interesting weapon and fun to shoot. The way
that they were sold they would fire only one round at a time, just like
my Ruger 10-22 rifle. Yet my 10-22 is legal, and an AK47 is not. Makes
loads of sense.
Rock and roll, baby!
http://www.hellfiretriggers.com/
--
Why settle for the lesser evil?
Cthulhu for President 2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jason McNorton" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do STUPID LIBERALS think Kerry is better than Bush? |
19 Aug 2004 08:44:00 PM |
|
|
In article <4bgai09lfc5vj5t6u74or1v366k48pgdj9@4ax.com>,
ev515o@hotmail.com says...
Rock and roll, baby!
http://www.hellfiretriggers.com/
Seen those at gun shows many times, always wondered if they work ok.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
