| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Francis" |
| Date: |
22 Sep 2004 09:48:13 AM |
| Object: |
Why is abortion ok? |
I'm curious as to why people agree with abortion at all?
What are the main justifications of it?
I ask these questions as I'd like to gain the viewpoint of those who do
agree with it, in the hopes of having a fuller opinion on it myself.
Regards,
Francis
.
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
23 Sep 2004 05:31:09 AM |
|
|
"Francis" <nospam@nospam.none> wrote in message
news:cis3j6$p5m$1@kermit.esat.net...
I'm curious as to why people agree with abortion at all?
What are the main justifications of it?
I ask these questions as I'd like to gain the viewpoint of those who do
agree with it, in the hopes of having a fuller opinion on it myself.
Regards,
Francis
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
It's ok to people who do not want to take responsibility for their actions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
23 Sep 2004 05:06:25 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:31:09 -0500,
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th century.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
It's ok to people who do not want to take responsibility for
their actions.
Wrong again! The 35 million American women who have
accessed safe and legal abortion betweeen 1973 and now have
very RESPONSIBLY put their lives back on track and preserved
their full range of furture opportunities, and then MOST of those
women went on to HAVE children later on anyway -- by CHOICE --
when the timing was RIGHT, and those children thus were born, in
most cases, into more stable environments than the first-round ones
would have been (BTW -- those 2nd-round kids... numbering in
the tens of millions... never would have existed if NOT for their
mothers having previously had the earlier abortions. Knowing
*why* that is the case requires just a SLIGHT bit of extra thought,
of which almost no Anti-Choicer alive is capable of generating, so I
won't expect you to figure it out, or "try to teach a pig to sing" by
explaining it to you.) Thus, in many ways, those women were
some of the MOST sensible, mature, and RESPONSIBLE of
America's citizens and I'm PROUD to be a defender of their rights.
(Meanwhile, YOU merely continue to be a pathetic LOSER.)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
23 Sep 2004 08:20:51 AM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41529c5e.22505248@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:31:09 -0500,
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th century.
Why do you assume so much?
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are my
spokesperson?
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you for exposing the wimpdom.
It's ok to people who do not want to take responsibility for
their actions.
Wrong again! The 35 million American women who have
accessed safe and legal abortion betweeen 1973 and now have
very RESPONSIBLY put their lives back on track and preserved
their full range of furture opportunities, and then MOST of those
women went on to HAVE children later on anyway -- by CHOICE --
when the timing was RIGHT, and those children thus were born, in
most cases, into more stable environments than the first-round ones
would have been (BTW -- those 2nd-round kids... numbering in
the tens of millions... never would have existed if NOT for their
mothers having previously had the earlier abortions. Knowing
*why* that is the case requires just a SLIGHT bit of extra thought,
of which almost no Anti-Choicer alive is capable of generating, so I
won't expect you to figure it out, or "try to teach a pig to sing" by
explaining it to you.) Thus, in many ways, those women were
some of the MOST sensible, mature, and RESPONSIBLE of
America's citizens and I'm PROUD to be a defender of their rights.
LOL!!!!!!!
Nah. Get real. I typed "It's ok to people who do not want to take
responsibility for
their actions." They defintely do not see their actions to fruition, which
would be birth, or a miscarraige if the pregnancy were to be aborted
naturally.
You run a temple brothel?
Is that how you garner church contributions?
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
23 Sep 2004 08:36:18 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:20:51 -0500,
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are my
spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
It's ok to people who do not want to take responsibility for
their actions.
Wrong again! The 35 million American women who have
accessed safe and legal abortion betweeen 1973 and now have
very RESPONSIBLY put their lives back on track and preserved
their full range of furture opportunities, and then MOST of those
women went on to HAVE children later on anyway -- by CHOICE --
when the timing was RIGHT, and those children thus were born, in
most cases, into more stable environments than the first-round ones
would have been (BTW -- those 2nd-round kids... numbering in
the tens of millions... never would have existed if NOT for their
mothers having previously had the earlier abortions. Knowing
*why* that is the case requires just a SLIGHT bit of extra thought,
of which almost no Anti-Choicer alive is capable of generating, so I
won't expect you to figure it out, or "try to teach a pig to sing" by
explaining it to you.) Thus, in many ways, those women were
some of the MOST sensible, mature, and RESPONSIBLE of
America's citizens and I'm PROUD to be a defender of their rights.
LOL!!!!!!! Nah. Get real. I typed "It's ok to people who do not
want to take responsibility for their actions." They defintely do not
see their actions to fruition, which would be birth, or a miscarraige
if the pregnancy were to be aborted naturally.
Wrong. The ACTION was the sex... which presumably WAS
carried to fruition. The UNwanted pregnancy was a MISHAP.
And abortion was the weldome and beneficial REMEDY for the
mishap.
Too bad you're too retarded to comprehend something as
elementary and easy-to-understand as that.
And -- MOST importantly of all -- NONE of that is ANY of
**your** business unless you were one of the people engaging
in the specific sexual liaison being discussed.
(BUSYBODYISM: The common denominator of ALL mindless
bigots. Equal to their ignorance. Science should develop a BQ.
["Busybodyism Quotient."] And **start** with testing for that.
For those who fail it with a predetermined baseline score, no
further IQ testing would be necessary: Automatic moron.)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
24 Sep 2004 07:22:14 AM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:416274db.77934632@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:20:51 -0500,
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are my
spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
They defintiely are not happy about it.
It is a characteristic of abortion advocates such as you who becoem angry
and insult so much that no one will believe you eventually.
It's ok to people who do not want to take responsibility for
their actions.
Wrong again! The 35 million American women who have
accessed safe and legal abortion betweeen 1973 and now have
very RESPONSIBLY put their lives back on track and preserved
their full range of furture opportunities, and then MOST of those
women went on to HAVE children later on anyway -- by CHOICE --
when the timing was RIGHT, and those children thus were born, in
most cases, into more stable environments than the first-round ones
would have been (BTW -- those 2nd-round kids... numbering in
the tens of millions... never would have existed if NOT for their
mothers having previously had the earlier abortions. Knowing
*why* that is the case requires just a SLIGHT bit of extra thought,
of which almost no Anti-Choicer alive is capable of generating, so I
won't expect you to figure it out, or "try to teach a pig to sing" by
explaining it to you.) Thus, in many ways, those women were
some of the MOST sensible, mature, and RESPONSIBLE of
America's citizens and I'm PROUD to be a defender of their rights.
LOL!!!!!!! Nah. Get real. I typed "It's ok to people who do not
want to take responsibility for their actions." They defintely do not
see their actions to fruition, which would be birth, or a miscarraige
if the pregnancy were to be aborted naturally.
Wrong. The ACTION was the sex... which presumably WAS
carried to fruition.
The UNwanted pregnancy was a MISHAP.
By who?
Your analyissis is too suspect and does not cover all bases well enough.
YOu are calling pregnancies mishpas now?
Who made tjhe mishap then?
You are acting that somehow if a sperm cell fertilizes and egg it was a
mishap.
Sorry, but you are wrong and fruition is a long way away from fertilization.
And abortion was the weldome and beneficial REMEDY for the
mishap.
Abortion was maybe the mishap.
Too bad you're too retarded to comprehend something as
elementary and easy-to-understand as that.
Your analysis is fraught with error.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
24 Sep 2004 10:27:53 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:22:14 -0500,
Sociopathic Liberty-Hater, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are my
spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
To an extent. Because SENIBLE people are *saddened* by
the abject IGNORANCE of the Anti-Choicers, and are angered by
their HATEFULNESS and disrespect for personal liberties. But that
is *combined* with our LAUGHING at such an utterly *ludcrous*
spectacle.
They defintiely are not happy about it.
For the reasons stated above, no. But we DO regard such morons
to be total CLOWNS.
It's ok to people who do not want to take responsibility for
their actions.
Wrong again! The 35 million American women who have
accessed safe and legal abortion betweeen 1973 and now have
very RESPONSIBLY put their lives back on track and preserved
their full range of furture opportunities, and then MOST of those
women went on to HAVE children later on anyway -- by CHOICE --
when the timing was RIGHT, and those children thus were born, in
most cases, into more stable environments than the first-round ones
would have been (BTW -- those 2nd-round kids... numbering in
the tens of millions... never would have existed if NOT for their
mothers having previously had the earlier abortions. Knowing
*why* that is the case requires just a SLIGHT bit of extra thought,
of which almost no Anti-Choicer alive is capable of generating, so I
won't expect you to figure it out, or "try to teach a pig to sing" by
explaining it to you.) Thus, in many ways, those women were
some of the MOST sensible, mature, and RESPONSIBLE of
America's citizens and I'm PROUD to be a defender of their rights.
LOL!!!!!!! Nah. Get real. I typed "It's ok to people who do not
want to take responsibility for their actions." They defintely do not
see their actions to fruition, which would be birth, or a miscarraige
if the pregnancy were to be aborted naturally.
Wrong. The ACTION was the sex... which presumably WAS
carried to fruition. The UNwanted pregnancy was a MISHAP.
By who?
Not by "WHOM," due due to WHAT? AnswerL Birth control failure,
or inadequately-practiced birth control. NO biggie, since the REMEDY
is easily-accessible. The $300 fee can serve as an incentive to them
to do a BETTER job of practicing contraception, next time. But in any
event, the whole episode is absolutely NONE you you busiiness, nor
that of anyone else, busybody.
YOu are calling pregnancies mishpas now?
(LOL!!! You proofread even worse than I do!)
No. The occurrance of UNWANTED pregnancies are mishaps.
And, fortunately, EASILY remedied.
And abortion was the welcome and beneficial REMEDY
for the mishap.
Abortion was maybe the mishap.
Never. Abortion is ALWAYS a hugely-valuable REMEDY, and
that is **all** that it is.
Too bad you're too retarded to comprehend something as
elementary and easy-to-understand as that.
Again, to put the paragraph back into its original state:
The ACTION was the sex... which presumably WAS carried to
fruition. The UNwanted pregnancy was a MISHAP. And abortion
was the welcome and beneficial REMEDY for the mishap.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
25 Sep 2004 02:34:21 AM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4158e218.42615473@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:22:14 -0500,
Sociopathic Liberty-Hater, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are my
spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
To an extent. Because SENIBLE people are *saddened* by
the abject IGNORANCE of the Anti-Choicers, and are angered by
their HATEFULNESS and disrespect for personal liberties.
No. They do not like people knowing. They do not like to be exposed.
But that
is *combined* with our LAUGHING at such an utterly *ludcrous*
spectacle.
They defintiely are not happy about it.
For the reasons stated above, no. But we DO regard such morons
to be total CLOWNS.
They do not like people knowing. They do not like to be exposed.
If they were comfortable with it they would not become sad or mad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
25 Sep 2004 01:57:58 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 02:34:21 -0500,
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Sociopathic Liberty-Hater, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are my
spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
To an extent. Because SENSIBLE people are *saddened* by
the abject IGNORANCE of the Anti-Choicers, and are angered by
their HATEFULNESS and disrespect for personal liberties.
No. They do not like people knowing. They do not like to
be exposed.
LOL!!! People, for example, who *have* abortions, don't
usually publicize it any more than do people when they have
*warts* removed, either. Or any **other** medical predure
that is -- [[[ CLUE!! ]] -- NO one else's business.
There's nothing any more shameful about abortion that there is
about accessing any OTHER remedy for an unwanted medical
condition.
So grow up, Wentzky. You are a joke!
But that is *combined* with our LAUGHING at such an utterly
*ludcrous* spectacle.
They defintiely are not happy about it.
For the reasons stated above, no. But we DO regard such
morons to be total CLOWNS.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
25 Sep 2004 05:45:30 AM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4160147f.55521180@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 02:34:21 -0500,
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Sociopathic Liberty-Hater, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th
century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are my
spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
To an extent. Because SENSIBLE people are *saddened* by
the abject IGNORANCE of the Anti-Choicers, and are angered by
their HATEFULNESS and disrespect for personal liberties.
No. They do not like people knowing. They do not like to
be exposed.
LOL!!! People, for example, who *have* abortions, don't
usually publicize it any more than do people when they have
*warts* removed, either.
It has been published for decades already.
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000 people who have
particpated in abortion already somehow, plus an abortion doctor in each
case.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Being the fault finder that I assume you are I will not even tell you how
45,000,000 times 2 equals 80,000,000.
Or any **other** medical predure
that is -- [[[ CLUE!! ]] -- NO one else's business.
It is lots of people's business.
It is online to read about.
It is in the news by independent organizations.
WE KNOW ABOUT IT, AND WE KNOW IT IS BEING DONE, AND WE ARE NOT ACCEPTING IT
BASED ON YOUR FALSE PLATITUDES!
There's nothing any more shameful about abortion that there is
about accessing any OTHER remedy for an unwanted medical
condition.
Wrong.
You are a liar.
So grow up, Wentzky. You are a joke!
I am grown. Almost. I probably have mroe growing to do.
Just wait until I am 51.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
25 Sep 2004 05:16:40 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:45:30 -0500,
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Sociopathic Liberty-Hater, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th
century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are my
spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
To an extent. Because SENSIBLE people are *saddened* by
the abject IGNORANCE of the Anti-Choicers, and are angered by
their HATEFULNESS and disrespect for personal liberties.
No. They do not like people knowing. They do not like to
be exposed.
LOL!!! People, for example, who *have* abortions, don't
usually publicize it any more than do people when they have
*warts* removed, either.
It has been published for decades already.
I said, "publicize," loon. As in going around as an INDIVIDUAL
telling everyone about the medical procedures thay have. MOST
people don't do that with respect to ANY procedures.
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell you how 45,000,000 times 2
equals 80,000,000.
More of your STUPIDITY, no doubt. Or else you're assuming that
somewhat fewer of the women's partners supported them in having the
abortions.
No matter. The number of abortio procedures, and the people who
have them, are as IRRELEVANT as the number of broken legs that were
set since 1973, or the number of appendectomies. It takes a VERY dull
person to ascribe any sort of importance to such utterly mundane and
unimportant things. Someone like you.
Or any **other** medical predure that is -- [[[ CLUE!! ]] -- NO one
else's business.
It is lots of people's business.
Yeah. That of the woman who obtains the abortion. And her
partner IF she chooses to include him in knowing about it (which can
be a BIG mistake if he happens to be an Anti-Choice bigot). And the
doctor who provides the abortion, and his staff.
And those are the ONLY people whose business it is,
It is online to read about. It is in the news by independent
organizations. WE KNOW ABOUT IT, AND WE KNOW IT IS
BEING DONE, AND WE ARE NOT ACCEPTING IT BASED
ON YOUR FALSE PLATITUDES!
LOL!!!!
Caps Lock key on the fritz, immature bigot?
(ROTFL!!!! He's LOST it, folks. He's a candidate for the cackle
factory -- unless he's already posting from one.)
There's nothing any more shameful about abortion that there is
about accessing any OTHER remedy for an unwanted medical
condition.
Wrong. You are a liar.
Thanks!!! Since everyone in here knows that ALL you ever
do is lie, you just confirmed that I was RIGHT, and that everything
I said is TRUE. (And that IS the case. Just as YOU are a very
ignorant and hateful bigot who doesn't give a rat's ***** for people.)
So grow up, Wentzky. You are a joke!
I am grown. Almost. I probably have mroe growing to do.
A ***LOT*** more. Especially mentally and socially.
Just wait until I am 51.
I'm betting you'll still be a pathetic loser. Sociopaths like you
almost NEVER outgrow their childish hatefulness and ignorance.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
25 Sep 2004 08:07:00 AM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:416b4182.67046107@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:45:30 -0500,
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Sociopathic Liberty-Hater, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th
century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are
my
spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
To an extent. Because SENSIBLE people are *saddened* by
the abject IGNORANCE of the Anti-Choicers, and are angered by
their HATEFULNESS and disrespect for personal liberties.
No. They do not like people knowing. They do not like to
be exposed.
LOL!!! People, for example, who *have* abortions, don't
usually publicize it any more than do people when they have
*warts* removed, either.
It has been published for decades already.
I said, "publicize," loon. As in going around as an INDIVIDUAL
telling everyone about the medical procedures thay have. MOST
people don't do that with respect to ANY procedures.
You really believe that?
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell you how 45,000,000 times 2
equals 80,000,000.
More of your STUPIDITY, no doubt. Or else you're assuming that
somewhat fewer of the women's partners supported them in having the
abortions.
You are really ignorant.
Some women had more than one abortion.
Some men impregnated more than one female who had an abortion.
What is the real number?
Maybe it is even less than 80,000,000.
So grow up, Wentzky. You are a joke!
I am grown. Almost. I probably have mroe growing to do.
A ***LOT*** more. Especially mentally and socially.
Just wait until I am 51.
I'm betting you'll still be a pathetic loser. Sociopaths like you
You already lost.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
25 Sep 2004 11:53:47 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:07:00 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:416b4182.67046107@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:45:30 -0500,
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Sociopathic Liberty-Hater, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th
century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you are
my spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
To an extent. Because SENSIBLE people are *saddened* by
the abject IGNORANCE of the Anti-Choicers, and are angered by
their HATEFULNESS and disrespect for personal liberties.
No. They do not like people knowing. They do not like to
be exposed.
LOL!!! People, for example, who *have* abortions, don't
usually publicize it any more than do people when they have
*warts* removed, either.
It has been published for decades already.
I said, "publicize," loon. As in going around as an INDIVIDUAL
telling everyone about the medical procedures thay have. MOST
people don't do that with respect to ANY procedures.
You really believe that?
Sure. It's OBVIOUS! When's the last time **you** saw someone
take out an ad, or walk around with a sign, that said, "I just had my
appendix out," or "I just recovered from a case of the mumps!" (??)
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell you how 45,000,000 times 2
equals 80,000,000.
More of your STUPIDITY, no doubt. Or else you're assuming that
somewhat fewer of the women's partners supported them in having the
abortions.
Some women had more than one abortion. Some men impregnated
more than one female who had an abortion. What is the real number?
Maybe it is even less than 80,000,000.
BORRRRRrrr-ing!!! No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's
***** WHAT the numbers are. Any more than they care how many
broken arms have been set, or how many people had tonsillectomies.
Have you cosidered getting yourself a life, ignoramus?
So grow up, Wentzky. You are a joke!
And you CONTINUE to be one, unabated.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
26 Sep 2004 08:46:43 AM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4172a05e.91333276@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:07:00 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:416b4182.67046107@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:45:30 -0500,
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Sociopathic Liberty-Hater, John Wentzky,
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Hateful Bigot, John Wentzky, <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Fruitcake, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
It's ok to people who make 'unwanted' babies.
Of course, you PREFER that women who have NO desire to
gestate to term be FORCED to do so. Thus making you no better
than the most hateful of plantation slave owners of the 19th
century.
Why do you assume so much?
I take your statements at face value. You constantly PROVE
that
you are a totally-ignorant fool, and a troll.
Why don't you read my statements and stop acting as if you
are
my spokesperson?
I read your statements very thoroughly, and reflect oupon them
honestly and ACCURATELY. You are a total fool. And you just keep
right on **proving** that to everyone beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It's ok to people who want to hide their acts.
...so as not to be harrassed by moronic BUSYBODIES like you?
They live in fear of others?
Quite the opposite. They generally LAUGH at loons like you.
Wrong. They generally either become sad or mad.
To an extent. Because SENSIBLE people are *saddened* by
the abject IGNORANCE of the Anti-Choicers, and are angered by
their HATEFULNESS and disrespect for personal liberties.
No. They do not like people knowing. They do not like to
be exposed.
LOL!!! People, for example, who *have* abortions, don't
usually publicize it any more than do people when they have
*warts* removed, either.
It has been published for decades already.
I said, "publicize," loon. As in going around as an INDIVIDUAL
telling everyone about the medical procedures thay have. MOST
people don't do that with respect to ANY procedures.
You really believe that?
Sure. It's OBVIOUS! When's the last time **you** saw someone
take out an ad, or walk around with a sign, that said, "I just had my
appendix out," or "I just recovered from a case of the mumps!" (??)
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell you how 45,000,000 times 2
equals 80,000,000.
More of your STUPIDITY, no doubt. Or else you're assuming that
somewhat fewer of the women's partners supported them in having the
abortions.
Some women had more than one abortion. Some men impregnated
more than one female who had an abortion. What is the real number?
Maybe it is even less than 80,000,000.
BORRRRRrrr-ing!!! No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's
***** WHAT the numbers are.
You lied, again.
I care. I am a person. Therefore, you lied.
Any more than they care how many
broken arms have been set, or how many people had tonsillectomies.
People do care about such things. That is why there are organization data
banks which compile such data.
Have you cosidered getting yourself a life, ignoramus?
Have you considered to cease telling lies?
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
26 Sep 2004 09:05:48 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 08:46:43 -0500,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Bigoted Social Retard, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell you how 45,000,000 times 2
equals 80,000,000.
More of your STUPIDITY, no doubt. Or else you're assuming that
somewhat fewer of the women's partners supported them in having the
abortions.
Some women had more than one abortion. Some men impregnated
more than one female who had an abortion. What is the real number?
Maybe it is even less than 80,000,000.
BORRRRRrrr-ing!!! No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's
***** WHAT the numbers are.
You lied, again.
Not "again." I've never lied in my posts, and I didn't do so in
this one. So you're wrong TWICE in a 3-word sentence!
I care. I am a person. Therefore, you lied.
Nope. I said,
"No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's ***** WHAT the
numbers are. Any more than they care how many broken arms
have been set, or how many people had tonsillectomies.
Take note of the qualiication I included in that -- that no person
***in his right mind*** would...
And I doubt if anyone in here has ever seen a time when you
provided any evidence of being in your right mind. You're just a
crummy, socially-retarded and hateful BIGOT. No such loser could
be in "his right mind,"
People do care about such things.
Not SENSIBLE people.
That is why there are organization data banks which compile
such data.
Except for reputable polling organizations, which in order to BE
reputable, are neutral... and who generally do polls on things that
pique people's interest, only BIASED, neocon organizations would
attempt to compile such numbers -- in the *vain* HOPE that they
could somehow engender support for their loathsome agenda.
And as for the polling agencies seing to pique people's
interest, that no doubt is to attract the attention of the bigots.
All business.
You lose again, Wentzky. As usual. You're a loser, WHINING
for a long-lost and worthless cause that soon will be EXTINCT.
Have you cosidered getting yourself a life, ignoramus?
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
26 Sep 2004 10:55:18 AM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:415bc833.8390269@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 08:46:43 -0500,
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
Bigoted Social Retard, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell you how 45,000,000 times 2
equals 80,000,000.
More of your STUPIDITY, no doubt. Or else you're assuming that
somewhat fewer of the women's partners supported them in having the
abortions.
Some women had more than one abortion. Some men impregnated
more than one female who had an abortion. What is the real number?
Maybe it is even less than 80,000,000.
BORRRRRrrr-ing!!! No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's
***** WHAT the numbers are.
You lied, again.
Not "again." I've never lied in my posts, and I didn't do so in
this one. So you're wrong TWICE in a 3-word sentence!
I care. I am a person. Therefore, you lied.
Nope. I said,
LOL!!!!!
Now, we see who is the immature, infantile, childish, anal, "I said so"
person.
It is you.
"No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's ***** WHAT the
numbers are. Any more than they care how many broken arms
have been set, or how many people had tonsillectomies.
You lied.
I am in my right mind.
Take note of the qualiication I included in that -- that no person
***in his right mind*** would...
Beat you to it, dinosaur brain.
And I doubt if anyone in here has ever seen a time when you
provided any evidence of being in your right mind. You're just a
crummy, socially-retarded and hateful BIGOT. No such loser could
be in "his right mind,"
People do care about such things.
Not SENSIBLE people.
You're not sensible.
I am sensible, and I care.
Therefore, you lied, again.
That is why there are organization data banks which compile
such data.
Except for reputable polling organizations, which in order to BE
reputable, are neutral... and who generally do polls on things that
pique people's interest, only BIASED, neocon organizations would
attempt to compile such numbers -- in the *vain* HOPE that they
could somehow engender support for their loathsome agenda.
You are a fool of great magnitude.
And as for the polling agencies seing to pique people's
interest, that no doubt is to attract the attention of the bigots.
All business.
Your are a fool. Proven.
You lose again, Wentzky. As usual. You're a loser, WHINING
for a long-lost and worthless cause that soon will be EXTINCT.
No. You lose every time you post a newsgroup message.
Have you considered getting yourself a life, ignoramus?
Have you considered not interfering with people's lives?
I think all you think about is getting a life.
You won't get it either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
26 Sep 2004 12:00:22 PM |
|
|
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
I am in my right mind.
Is that what the voices tell you?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
26 Sep 2004 12:56:35 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:55:18 -0500,
Clueless Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
"Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Social Retard, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
READERS: This note is my ONLY response to this post.
No other respose is necessary because Wentzky presented
absolutely NO fact (and probably wouldn't recognize a relevant
fact if he fell over it. I've provided him with dozens of facts and
-- social retard that he is (and possibly a mental one, too), he has
lived in total denial of them. He nas NEVER been able to dis-
prove ANY of them, nor has he ever been abple to present so
much as one single fact to support his bigoted agendas. And
all he does in this post is make a complete and ludicrous fool
of himself. In short, he's a total loser. And a troll. So feel free
to read his responses in this post for a good example of a loon
self-destructing; I haven't changed anything. And see if you
don't come to the SAME conclusion. --Craig
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
[ ... ]
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell you how 45,000,000 times 2
equals 80,000,000.
More of your STUPIDITY, no doubt. Or else you're assuming that
somewhat fewer of the women's partners supported them in having the
abortions.
Some women had more than one abortion. Some men impregnated
more than one female who had an abortion. What is the real number?
Maybe it is even less than 80,000,000.
BORRRRRrrr-ing!!! No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's
***** WHAT the numbers are.
You lied, again.
Not "again." I've never lied in my posts, and I didn't do so in
this one. So you're wrong TWICE in a 3-word sentence!
I care. I am a person. Therefore, you lied.
Nope. I said,
LOL!!!!!
Now, we see who is the immature, infantile, childish, anal, "I said so"
person.
It is you.
"No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's ***** WHAT the
numbers are. Any more than they care how many broken arms
have been set, or how many people had tonsillectomies.
You lied.
I am in my right mind.
Take note of the qualiication I included in that -- that no person
***in his right mind*** would...
Beat you to it, dinosaur brain.
And I doubt if anyone in here has ever seen a time when you
provided any evidence of being in your right mind. You're just a
crummy, socially-retarded and hateful BIGOT. No such loser could
be in "his right mind,"
People do care about such things.
Not SENSIBLE people.
You're not sensible.
I am sensible, and I care.
Therefore, you lied, again.
That is why there are organization data banks which compile
such data.
Except for reputable polling organizations, which in order to BE
reputable, are neutral... and who generally do polls on things that
pique people's interest, only BIASED, neocon organizations would
attempt to compile such numbers -- in the *vain* HOPE that they
could somehow engender support for their loathsome agenda.
You are a fool of great magnitude.
And as for the polling agencies seeking to pique people's
interest, that no doubt is to attract the attention of the bigots.
All business.
Your are a fool. Proven.
You lose again, Wentzky. As usual. You're a loser, WHINING
for a long-lost and worthless cause that soon will be EXTINCT.
No. You lose every time you post a newsgroup message.
Have you considered getting yourself a life, ignoramus?
Have you considered not interfering with people's lives?
I think all you think about is getting a life.
You won't get it either.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
26 Sep 2004 06:58:04 PM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:415effe3.22648280@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:55:18 -0500,
Clueless Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
"Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Social Retard, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
READERS: This note is my ONLY response to this post.
No other respose is necessary because I presented
absolutely NO fact (and probably wouldn't recognize a relevant
fact if I fell over it. I've provided everyone with dozens of fantasies
and
-- social retard that I am (and possibly a mental one, too), I have
lived in total rebelliousness to support them. I have NEVER been able to
prove ANY of them, nor have I ever
been able to present so much as one single fact to support my bigoted
agendas. And
all I do in this post is make a complete and ludicrous fool
of myself. In short, I'm a total loser. And a troll. So feel free
to read my responses in this post for a good example of a loon
self-destructing; I changed even his title in the post. And see if you
come to the SAME conclusion. --Craig
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
[ ... ]
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell you how 45,000,000 times 2
equals 80,000,000.
More of your STUPIDITY, no doubt. Or else you're assuming that
somewhat fewer of the women's partners supported them in having the
abortions.
Some women had more than one abortion. Some men impregnated
more than one female who had an abortion. What is the real number?
Maybe it is even less than 80,000,000.
BORRRRRrrr-ing!!! No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's
***** WHAT the numbers are.
You lied, again.
Not "again." I've never lied in my posts, and I didn't do so in
this one. So you're wrong TWICE in a 3-word sentence!
I care. I am a person. Therefore, you lied.
Nope. I said,
LOL!!!!!
Now, we see who is the immature, infantile, childish, anal, "I said so"
person.
It is you.
"No person in his right mind gives a flying rat's ***** WHAT the
numbers are. Any more than they care how many broken arms
have been set, or how many people had tonsillectomies.
You lied.
I am in my right mind.
Take note of the qualiication I included in that -- that no person
***in his right mind*** would...
Beat you to it, dinosaur brain.
And I doubt if anyone in here has ever seen a time when you
provided any evidence of being in your right mind. You're just a
crummy, socially-retarded and hateful BIGOT. No such loser could
be in "his right mind,"
People do care about such things.
Not SENSIBLE people.
You're not sensible.
I am sensible, and I care.
Therefore, you lied, again.
That is why there are organization data banks which compile
such data.
Except for reputable polling organizations, which in order to BE
reputable, are neutral... and who generally do polls on things that
pique people's interest, only BIASED, neocon organizations would
attempt to compile such numbers -- in the *vain* HOPE that they
could somehow engender support for their loathsome agenda.
You are a fool of great magnitude.
And as for the polling agencies seeking to pique people's
interest, that no doubt is to attract the attention of the bigots.
All business.
Your are a fool. Proven.
You lose again, Wentzky. As usual. You're a loser, WHINING
for a long-lost and worthless cause that soon will be EXTINCT.
No. You lose every time you post a newsgroup message.
Have you considered getting yourself a life, ignoramus?
Have you considered not interfering with people's lives?
I think all you think about is getting a life.
You won't get it either.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: Why is abortion ok? |
27 Sep 2004 04:21:18 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:58:04 -0500,
DISHONEST Bigot, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> ...
Just made a TOTAL fool of himself (again) by LYINGLY
**FORGING** changes in my response to his post.
All of that lying CRAP has been flushed, and my ORIGINAL
reply has been **restored**, below.
And Wentzky REMAINS a total moron who gas NO credibility.
Except that NOW, he's an even **bigger** laughingstock than he
was before.
(ROTFL!!!!! What a tool. Talk about a mindless
bigot's *self-destructing!* in public!! I **LOVE** it!!!)
ORIGINAL post, BEFORE the loon's dishonest and lying forgery --
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Clueless Bigot, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> spewed:
"Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ("GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!") wrote:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bigoted Social Retard, John Wentzky
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ignorant Loser, John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
READERS: This note is my ONLY response to this post.
No other respose is necessary because Wentzky presented
absolutely NO fact (and probably wouldn't recognize a relevant
fact if he fell over it. I've provided him with dozens of facts and
-- social retard that he is (and possibly a mental one, too), he has
lived in total denial of them. He nas NEVER been able to dis-
prove ANY of them, nor has he ever been abple to present so
much as one single fact to support his bigoted agendas. And
all he does in this post is make a complete and ludicrous fool
of himself. In short, he's a total loser. And a troll. So feel free
to read his responses in this post for a good example of a loon
self-destructing; I haven't changed anything. And see if you
don't come to the SAME conclusion. --Craig
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
[ ... ]
45,000,000 abortions makes somewhere close to 80,000,000
people who have participated in abortion already somehow, plus
an abortion doctor in each case. Being the fault finder that I
assume you are I will not even tell | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
