| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
01 Feb 2008 12:31:31 AM |
| Object: |
Winners And Losers From Global Cooling |
http://depleteduranium.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/winners-and-losers-from-global-cooling/
Winners And Losers From Global Cooling
If, as is likely, the world is entering a Little Ice Age, proponents
of man-made Global Warning have a rough future - here's a forecast.
What warming we have experienced is almost certainly due to
fluctuations in the sun (PDF), which is about to tank:
....in 2008, global temperatures would drop slightly, rather than rise,
due to unprecedentedly low solar radiation in the past 30 years, and
would continue decreasing even if industrial emissions of carbon
dioxide reach record levels.
By 2041, solar activity will reach its minimum according to a 200-year
cycle, and a deep cooling period will hit the Earth approximately in
2055-2060. It will last for about 45-65 years...
But it'll take time for the tanker to turn - after all, we've had no
warming for 8 years, and the warmensists are still in full cry. But as
2008, 2009, and 2010 trend colder, and the extra taxes and energy
rationing start hurting people, politicians of the Thatcher/Reagan
variety will emerge to speak truth to power.
The President and Prime Minister after next will be climate realists
who will pull the plug on the whole scam. They'll probably keep the
expanded nuclear power programs since these cut dependence on Russia
and Islam, but will get elected on promises to dump all Green taxes
and rationing.
So around 2011, things will look as follows.
Winners
Poor People
The world's poor start getting richer:
- The billions on curbing CO2 will be switched to giving them clean
water, medical care, and education.
- Poor nations will no longer be blackmailed to cut back on power
production.
- The world's farms will switch back from biofuels to food, so less
people will starve.
Rich People
They'll escape the curbs on personal autonomy (rationed air and car
travel), and the deaths caused by power rationing. French pensioners
(if any survive) will rejoice.
The Environment
The forests of expensive and ugly wind turbines will be retired, and
within a generation the rusting survivors will be tools for school
kids to learn about the Age of Unreason (or whatever future historians
call the period 1990 to 2010).
World Peace
The impositions needed to keep poor people poor and make rich people
poorer will vanish, reducing the chances of insurrections and civil
wars.
Losers
Science
People will remember the "Scientific Consensus" canard for
generations. Institutional science will rank lower than politics, and
smart kids will disdain it. That will not be a bad thing, since
science will revert to honest amateurs like Ben Franklin and the 19th
Century Brit clergymen.
The UN
The UN has wriggled out of many crimes, including Oil For Food and its
assault in Israel. But this time it will have harmed every person in
the world. So like the League of Nations it will quickly vanish,
probably to be replaced by groups of like-minded nations.
The Leaders
Gore and Blair (now a lucrative "Climate Change Adviser"), and other
warmenist pols will become pariahs, rather like Nazis at the end of
WW2. Their thousands of accomplices in the MSM, science, and politics
will have terminally damaged reputations.
The Climate Change Industry
The outfits that trade carbon credits, build and run subsidized
"sustainable" power plants, give CO2 footprint assessments, and sell
CO2 offsets will become the Enrons of 2011, blighting the careers of
their managers and employees.
The Greens
The Sierra Club, the Brit Royal Society and all the other Green shills
will be stigmatized, like Nazi collaborators after WW2.
The Color Green
Will become the universal color of bereavement - the new Black.
This entry was posted on January 29, 2008 at 5:10 pm and is filed
under Junk Science.
.
|
|
| User: "kT" |
|
| Title: Re: Winners And Losers From Global Cooling |
01 Feb 2008 02:12:16 AM |
|
|
wrote:
This entry was posted on January 29, 2008 at 5:10 pm and is filed
under Junk Science.
Right. Got it. Thanks!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lloyd" |
|
| Title: Re: Winners And Losers From Global Cooling |
01 Feb 2008 10:01:57 AM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 1:31 am, wrote:
http://depleteduranium.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/winners-and-losers-fr...
Winners And Losers From Global Cooling
If, as is likely, the world is entering a Little Ice Age,
Like "If pigs could fly..."
proponents
of man-made Global Warning have a rough future - here's a forecast.
What warming we have experienced is almost certainly due to
fluctuations in the sun (PDF), which is about to tank:
Well, every scientific organization and every scientific group says
otherwise, but I'm sure you can explain why you know more than actual
scientists.
...in 2008, global temperatures would drop slightly, rather than rise,
due to unprecedentedly low solar radiation in the past 30 years,
So how come it's gone up for those 30 years?
and
would continue decreasing even if industrial emissions of carbon
dioxide reach record levels.
By 2041, solar activity will reach its minimum according to a 200-year
cycle, and a deep cooling period will hit the Earth approximately in
2055-2060. It will last for about 45-65 years...
But it'll take time for the tanker to turn - after all, we've had no
warming for 8 years,
OK, lie. 2005 was the hottest year ever. Or maybe you just can't do
math?
and the warmensists are still in full cry. But as
2008, 2009, and 2010 trend colder, and the extra taxes and energy
rationing start hurting people, politicians of the Thatcher/Reagan
variety will emerge to speak truth to power.
The President and Prime Minister after next will be climate realists
who will pull the plug on the whole scam. They'll probably keep the
expanded nuclear power programs since these cut dependence on Russia
and Islam, but will get elected on promises to dump all Green taxes
and rationing.
So around 2011, things will look as follows.
Winners
Poor People
The world's poor start getting richer:
- The billions on curbing CO2 will be switched to giving them clean
water, medical care, and education.
- Poor nations will no longer be blackmailed to cut back on power
production.
- The world's farms will switch back from biofuels to food, so less
people will starve.
Rich People
They'll escape the curbs on personal autonomy (rationed air and car
travel), and the deaths caused by power rationing. French pensioners
(if any survive) will rejoice.
The Environment
The forests of expensive and ugly wind turbines will be retired, and
within a generation the rusting survivors will be tools for school
kids to learn about the Age of Unreason (or whatever future historians
call the period 1990 to 2010).
World Peace
The impositions needed to keep poor people poor and make rich people
poorer will vanish, reducing the chances of insurrections and civil
wars.
Losers
Science
People will remember the "Scientific Consensus" canard for
generations. Institutional science will rank lower than politics, and
smart kids will disdain it. That will not be a bad thing, since
science will revert to honest amateurs like Ben Franklin and the 19th
Century Brit clergymen.
Or like your pals, the flat-earthers?
The UN
The UN has wriggled out of many crimes, including Oil For Food and its
assault in Israel. But this time it will have harmed every person in
the world. So like the League of Nations it will quickly vanish,
probably to be replaced by groups of like-minded nations.
The Leaders
Gore and Blair (now a lucrative "Climate Change Adviser"), and other
warmenist pols will become pariahs, rather like Nazis at the end of
WW2. Their thousands of accomplices in the MSM, science, and politics
will have terminally damaged reputations.
The Climate Change Industry
The outfits that trade carbon credits, build and run subsidized
"sustainable" power plants, give CO2 footprint assessments, and sell
CO2 offsets will become the Enrons of 2011, blighting the careers of
their managers and employees.
The Greens
The Sierra Club, the Brit Royal Society and all the other Green shills
will be stigmatized, like Nazi collaborators after WW2.
The Color Green
Will become the universal color of bereavement - the new Black.
This entry was posted on January 29, 2008 at 5:10 pm and is filed
under Junk Science.
And the tooth fairy will be proven to exist. But will we find those
WMD in Iraq?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "matt_sykes" |
|
| Title: Re: Winners And Losers From Global Cooling |
01 Feb 2008 01:38:37 AM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 7:31=A0am, wrote:
http://depleteduranium.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/winners-and-losers-fr...
Winners And Losers From Global Cooling
If, as is likely, the world is entering a Little Ice Age, proponents
of man-made Global Warning have a rough future - here's a forecast.
What warming we have experienced is almost certainly due to
fluctuations in the sun (PDF), which is about to tank:
...in 2008, global temperatures would drop slightly, rather than rise,
due to unprecedentedly low solar radiation in the past 30 years, and
would continue decreasing even if industrial emissions of carbon
dioxide reach record levels.
By 2041, solar activity will reach its minimum according to a 200-year
cycle, and a deep cooling period will hit the Earth approximately in
2055-2060. It will last for about 45-65 years...
But it'll take time for the tanker to turn - after all, we've had no
warming for 8 years, and the warmensists are still in full cry. But as
2008, 2009, and 2010 trend colder, and the extra taxes and energy
rationing start hurting people, politicians of the Thatcher/Reagan
variety will emerge to speak truth to power.
The President and Prime Minister after next will be climate realists
who will pull the plug on the whole scam. They'll probably keep the
expanded nuclear power programs since these cut dependence on Russia
and Islam, but will get elected on promises to dump all Green taxes
and rationing.
So around 2011, things will look as follows.
Winners
Poor People
The world's poor start getting richer:
- The billions on curbing CO2 will be switched to giving them clean
water, medical care, and education.
- Poor nations will no longer be blackmailed to cut back on power
production.
- The world's farms will switch back from biofuels to food, so less
people will starve.
Rich People
They'll escape the curbs on personal autonomy (rationed air and car
travel), and the deaths caused by power rationing. French pensioners
(if any survive) will rejoice.
The Environment
The forests of expensive and ugly wind turbines will be retired, and
within a generation the rusting survivors will be tools for school
kids to learn about the Age of Unreason (or whatever future historians
call the period 1990 to 2010).
World Peace
The impositions needed to keep poor people poor and make rich people
poorer will vanish, reducing the chances of insurrections and civil
wars.
Losers
Science
People will remember the "Scientific Consensus" canard for
generations. Institutional science will rank lower than politics, and
smart kids will disdain it. That will not be a bad thing, since
science will revert to honest amateurs like Ben Franklin and the 19th
Century Brit clergymen.
The UN
The UN has wriggled out of many crimes, including Oil For Food and its
assault in Israel. But this time it will have harmed every person in
the world. So like the League of Nations it will quickly vanish,
probably to be replaced by groups of like-minded nations.
The Leaders
Gore and Blair (now a lucrative "Climate Change Adviser"), and other
warmenist pols will become pariahs, rather like Nazis at the end of
WW2. Their thousands of accomplices in the MSM, science, and politics
will have terminally damaged reputations.
The Climate Change Industry
The outfits that trade carbon credits, build and run subsidized
"sustainable" power plants, give CO2 footprint assessments, and sell
CO2 offsets will become the Enrons of 2011, blighting the careers of
their managers and employees.
The Greens
The Sierra Club, the Brit Royal Society and all the other Green shills
will be stigmatized, like Nazi collaborators after WW2.
The Color Green
Will become the universal color of bereavement - the new Black.
This entry was posted on January 29, 2008 at 5:10 pm and is filed
under Junk Science.
Thatcher is actually responsible for AGW.
However, as you say the damage is going to be quite deep and wide.
What I fear is that valid environmentalism, lead, mercury, pcbs,
pesticides etc, will be tarnished too and we could reverse progress on
these real pollutants made over tha last 30 years.
Science too is going to be muddied. If science now doesnt stand up
and say, ''hold back a bit, its no way near that bad, or that
certain'', then it is going to loose all respect.
As for the UN, can it be justified at all? Does it do any good in the
world? It seems to be an organisation whose sole purpose is to
provide employment for its staff. In every critical situation I can
think of it has failed to act, as did the LON before it. Ruanda,
Kosovo for example.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kT" |
|
| Title: Re: Winners And Losers From Global Cooling |
01 Feb 2008 04:39:23 AM |
|
|
matt_sykes wrote:
Science too is going to be muddied.
I know, general relativity and quantum mechanics were a bad idea.
Why can everything be absolute!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Talk-n-Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: Winners And Losers From Global Cooling |
01 Feb 2008 10:11:52 AM |
|
|
kT wrote:
matt_sykes wrote:
Science too is going to be muddied.
I know, general relativity and quantum mechanics were a bad idea.
Why can everything be absolute!
If it's not absolute, it's a hypothesis or theory.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lloyd" |
|
| Title: Re: Winners And Losers From Global Cooling |
02 Feb 2008 11:45:13 AM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 11:11 am, Talk-n-Dog <@http://dogi-pedia.talk-n-dog.com>
wrote:
kT wrote:
matt_sykes wrote:
Science too is going to be muddied.
I know, general relativity and quantum mechanics were a bad idea.
Why can everything be absolute!
If it's not absolute, it's a hypothesis or theory.
Oh look, we've got a scientific ignoramus here, who doesn't know what
the word "theory" means in science. Yet he flaunts his ignorance as
if he's proud of it. Could it be he's ignorant of his ignorance?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|