Science > Abortion > "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are.
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
| Date: |
22 Jul 2004 05:44:36 AM |
| Object: |
"WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
On 21 Jul 2004 22:29:27 -0700,
Ignorant Bigot, William J. Wolfe
<w_j_wolfe2oo3@yahoo.com> spewed
"seth72" <seth72@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
My guess is someone here guessed the password and deleted
it. Too bad, I made another one and the password isn't so easy to
guess this time. The last one WAS simple to guess.
You lying little poofter. You never had a web site and you
don't have the brains or the ability to author a web site. Stick
to playing with yourself, little ***** eater, it's the one thing that
you can do.
ROTFL!!!!!
(There goes Wolfie, making a TOTAL, bigoted and socially-
retarded ***** of himself again.
Situation normal.
The above being from a person who has proven on countless
occasions that he's too bone-DUMB to be able to distinguish between
folks who are gay and those who comprise the gays' 100 million-plus
"straight" ALLIES of the gay community in its quest for full ACCESS to
the EQUAL rights that they have always been entitled to. And thus
is so abusmally stupid as not to have figured out yet that I am one of
that 100 million-plus "straights."
WHICH, of course, would put me in the category [in HIS retarded
opinion] of being a person who lacks the "brains or ability to author
a website.")
So if you're HONEST, Wolfie (**THAT'LL** be the day!!), you'll go
to ANY supermarket in America this week, and pick up a copy of THIS
week's issue of "Woman's World" Magazine, at the checkout counter.
(The July 27, 2004 issue.) The story in the first column, on page 40,
1/3 of the way down, covers TWO things that I authored, 100% -- my
perennially-well-selling book, AND my website.
THEN -- **IF** you were honest, you'd go to the meat department
and see if they have any nice, fresh CROW in stock, so that you
could eat an **appropriate** meal for a change.
But since you're NOT an honest person... or even, for that matter,
an even marginally-intelligent person... you wouldn't do that, even if
that supermarket WERE to have crow on sale.
Socially-retarded bigots like you will always be with us, unfortun-
ately. But fortunately, only in SMALL numbers. For example, look
at today's KKK -- 40 years after the demise of segregation -- on the
brink of total extinction. THAT is the ultimate fate of today's
homophobes/Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
You will NOT be missed.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
22 Jul 2004 06:23:54 AM |
|
|
(Re-posted, with a couple of small typos corrected.)
Ignorant Bigot, William J. Wolfe
<w_j_wolfe2oo3@yahoo.com> spewed
"seth72" <seth72@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
My guess is someone here guessed the password and deleted
it. Too bad, I made another one and the password isn't so easy to
guess this time. The last one WAS simple to guess.
You lying little poofter. You never had a web site and you
don't have the brains or the ability to author a web site. Stick
to playing with yourself, little ***** eater, it's the one thing that
you can do.
ROTFL!!!!!
(There goes Wolfie, making a TOTAL, bigoted and socially-
retarded ***** of himself again.
Situation normal.
The above being from a person who has proven on countless
occasions that he's too bone-DUMB to be able to distinguish between
folks who are gay and those who comprise the gays' 100 million-plus
"straight" ALLIES of the gay community in its quest for full ACCESS to
the EQUAL rights that they have always been entitled to. And thus
is so abysmally stupid as not to have figured out yet that I am one of
that 100 million-plus HETerosexuals.
WHICH, of course, would put *me* in the category [in HIS retarded
opinion] of being a person who lacks the "brains or ability to author
a website.")
So if you're HONEST, Wolfie (**THAT'LL** be the day!!), you'll go
to ANY supermarket in America this week, and pick up a copy of THIS
week's issue of "Woman's World" Magazine, at the checkout counter.
(The July 27, 2004 issue.) The story in the first column, on page 40,
1/3 of the way down, covers TWO things that I authored, 100% -- my
perennially-well-selling book, AND my website.
THEN -- **IF** you were honest, you'd go to the meat department
and see if they have any nice, fresh CROW in stock, so that you
could eat an **appropriate** meal for a change.
But since you're NOT an honest person... or even, for that matter,
an even marginally-intelligent person... you wouldn't do that, even if
that supermarket WERE to have crow on sale.
Socially-retarded bigots like you will always be with us, unfortun-
ately. But fortunately, only in SMALL numbers. For example, look
at today's KKK -- 40 years after the demise of segregation -- on the
brink of total extinction. THAT is the ultimate fate of today's
homophobes/Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
Your pathetic and hateful ilk will NOT be missed.
Not even slightly.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
22 Jul 2004 06:38:12 AM |
|
|
While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:44:36 GMT,
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) screamed out:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:29:27 -0700,
Ignorant Bigot, William J. Wolfe
<w_j_wolfe2oo3@yahoo.com> spewed
"seth72" <seth72@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
My guess is someone here guessed the password and deleted
it. Too bad, I made another one and the password isn't so easy to
guess this time. The last one WAS simple to guess.
You lying little poofter. You never had a web site and you
don't have the brains or the ability to author a web site. Stick
to playing with yourself, little ***** eater, it's the one thing that
you can do.
ROTFL!!!!!
(There goes Wolfie, making a TOTAL, bigoted and socially-
retarded ***** of himself again.
Situation normal.
The above being from a person who has proven on countless
occasions that he's too bone-DUMB to be able to distinguish between
folks who are gay and those who comprise the gays' 100 million-plus
"straight" ALLIES of the gay community in its quest for full ACCESS to
the EQUAL rights that they have always been entitled to. And thus
is so abusmally stupid as not to have figured out yet that I am one of
that 100 million-plus "straights."
There is no denial of equal rights by saying
homosexuals cannot marry.
One does not put on a Jets uniform and demand to be
able to play with the team, just because one wants to
and then claim a denial of equal rights. There is a
definition as to what a Jet is.
One who is white does not demand a government loan on
the basis of being a minority and then claim that they
are being denied their equal rights when they are
denied. There is a definition of what a minority is.
In the same way, there is a definition of what a
marriage is. It is one man and one woman. Homosexuals
do not qualify, by definition.
Besides this, the agenda of the homosexual movement is
not to have marriage, but to abolish it and once
marriage is granted for them, then the flood gates open
and we have people suing to marry more than one partner
and to marry their pets, etc.. Sound fantastic and
hard to believe? People in Utah are already suing,
based on the Lawrence case, which the court decided in
favor of, that homosexual marriage in Constitutional.
Look to the Netherlands, where homosexual marriage is
legal and you'll find lawsuits based on those cases, in
which people are actually suing to marry animals and in
groups and relatives. These are the facts. Look it up
for yourselves. So when someone like you says no harm
would be done, you're lying and we both know it. And
who will end up suffering the most? The children, who
cannot even count on what a family is.
--
± Pastor Dave Raymond ±
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor
to follow thee: neither have I desired the woeful day;
thou knowest: that which came out of my lips was right
before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"If something in science suddenly becomes
so sacrosanct that you can't question it,
then it ceases to be science," he said.
"And I really think that's what's become
of Darwinism." - Roger DeHart
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
27 Jul 2004 04:01:41 PM |
|
|
"Pastor Dave" <nospam*-*pastordave38@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3e9vf09am4448pmjumvn98islp5l1h6588@4ax.com...
While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:44:36 GMT,
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) screamed out:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:29:27 -0700,
Ignorant Bigot, William J. Wolfe
<w_j_wolfe2oo3@yahoo.com> spewed
"seth72" <seth72@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
<snip>
ROTFL!!!!!
(There goes Wolfie, making a TOTAL, bigoted and socially-
retarded ***** of himself again.
Situation normal.
The above being from a person who has proven on countless
occasions that he's too bone-DUMB to be able to distinguish between
folks who are gay and those who comprise the gays' 100 million-plus
"straight" ALLIES of the gay community in its quest for full ACCESS to
the EQUAL rights that they have always been entitled to. And thus
is so abusmally stupid as not to have figured out yet that I am one of
that 100 million-plus "straights."
There is no denial of equal rights by saying
homosexuals cannot marry.
Can hetrosexuals marry ?
Can homosexuals marry ?
One does not put on a Jets uniform and demand to be
able to play with the team, just because one wants to
and then claim a denial of equal rights. There is a
definition as to what a Jet is.
Unless you are talking about sex as "bedroom olympics" love isn't a sport
Your defination is biased
One who is white does not demand a government loan on
the basis of being a minority and then claim that they
are being denied their equal rights when they are
denied. There is a definition of what a minority is.
In the same way, there is a definition of what a
marriage is. It is one man and one woman. Homosexuals
do not qualify, by definition.
*your* defination is NOT what *everyone* agrees with.
Besides this, the agenda of the homosexual movement is
not to have marriage, but to abolish it and once
marriage is granted for them, then the flood gates open
and we have people suing to marry more than one partner
and to marry their pets, etc..
I wish you could only see how idiotic you sound.
Sound fantastic and hard to believe? People in Utah are already suing,
based on the Lawrence case, which the court decided in
favor of, that homosexual marriage in Constitutional.
Look to the Netherlands, where homosexual marriage is
legal and you'll find lawsuits based on those cases, in
which people are actually suing to marry animals and in
groups and relatives.
LOL, so if it happens in one place it will happen in another, we already
have nut cases, we always will, your argument is moot.
These are the facts. Look it up
for yourselves. So when someone like you says no harm
would be done, you're lying and we both know it.
You are a *****-poor mind reader, I would recommend that you stick with your
day job.
And who will end up suffering the most? The children, who
cannot even count on what a family is.
Time will tell, but I have my doubts that would be the case, any more than
found in inter-racial families, like mine.
--
± Pastor Dave Raymond ±
Glenn (Christian Mystic)
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor
to follow thee: neither have I desired the woeful day;
thou knowest: that which came out of my lips was right
before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"If something in science suddenly becomes
so sacrosanct that you can't question it,
then it ceases to be science," he said.
"And I really think that's what's become
of Darwinism." - Roger DeHart
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pangur Ban" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
27 Jul 2004 06:52:39 PM |
|
|
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
"Pastor Dave" <nospam*-*pastordave38@yahoo.com>
wrote in message
news:3e9vf09am4448pmjumvn98islp5l1h6588@4ax.com...
While skydiving off of the Empire State
Building on Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:44:36 GMT,
xanadu222@mchsi.com (GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov.
2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W.
Bush!) screamed out:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:29:27 -0700, Ignorant
Bigot, William J. Wolfe
<w_j_wolfe2oo3@yahoo.com> spewed
"seth72" <seth72@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
*snip*
And who will end up suffering the most? The
children, who cannot even count on what a
family is.
A child does NOT require a male and female parent
to become a well-adjusted, "normal", happy
adult.......what is needed is two loving caring
adults as parents - of any sex.
Having seen the battered children from traditional
homes with a "mom and dad" - I would rather see
those kids being raised by two homosexuals or two
lesbians - or any combination of GLTs.
Pangur
Time will tell, but I have my doubts that would
be the case, any more than found in
inter-racial families, like mine.
-- ± Pastor Dave Raymond ±
Glenn (Christian Mystic)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
22 Jul 2004 08:39:21 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:38:12 -0400,
PSEUDO-Pastor Dave <pastordave38@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ((GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) wrote:
Ignorant Bigot, William J. Wolfe
<w_j_wolfe2oo3@yahoo.com> spewed
"seth72" <seth72@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
My guess is someone here guessed the password and deleted
it. Too bad, I made another one and the password isn't so easy to
guess this time. The last one WAS simple to guess.
You lying little poofter. You never had a web site and you
don't have the brains or the ability to author a web site. Stick
to playing with yourself, little ***** eater, it's the one thing that
you can do.
ROTFL!!!!!
(There goes Wolfie, making a TOTAL, bigoted and socially-
retarded ***** of himself again.
Situation normal.
The above being from a person who has proven on countless
occasions that he's too bone-DUMB to be able to distinguish between
folks who are gay and those who comprise the gays' 100 million-plus
"straight" ALLIES of the gay community in its quest for full ACCESS to
the EQUAL rights that they have always been entitled to. And thus
is so abusmally stupid as not to have figured out yet that I am one of
that 100 million-plus "straights."
There is no denial of equal rights by saying homosexuals
cannot marry.
Yes, there most certainly IS. If there weren't, we wouldn't be
seing a collection of hateful loons running around flapping their
arms and screeching for a Bigotry Amendment with which to
pollute and poison the Constitution.
One does not put on a Jets uniform and demand to be
able to play with the team, just because one wants to
and then claim a denial of equal rights. There is a
definition as to what a Jet is.
And there is NO legal definition of marriage in the Constitution
that would EXCLUDE gays from marrying their same-sex partners.
And the morons who SEEK to exclude them are loathsome bigots
who are without excuse.
One who is white does not demand a government loan on
the basis of being a minority and then claim that they are being
denied their equal rights when they are denied. There is a
definition of what a minority is.
Yeah. ANY group of people who do not constitute the
MAJORITY of people in the given category.
In the same way, there is a definition of what a marriage is.
It is one man and one woman. Homosexuals do not qualify,
by definition.
In YOUR **bigoted** opinion. What utter bullcrap!! See my
first paragraph, above.
Besides this, the agenda of the homosexual movement...
Did you regard the FIRST Civil Rights Movement, 40+ years
ago, to be an "agenda?" Sheeesh!!! What total LOSERS you
and your hateful & bigoted ilk are!
...is not to have marriage, but to abolish it...
What a blatant LIE, **pseudo**-pastor. Aren't you aware that
there is a COMMANDMENT against that? (And NO command-
ments about homosexuality, BTW.)
CHALLENGE: Tell us just ONE way that ANY heterosexual
couple's marriage would be harmed in ANY way if a same-sex
couple somewhere got married. Just ONE. (Or be man enough
to ADMIT your abject stupidity!)
...and once marriage is granted for them, then the flood
gates open...
Ah. Wording taken directly from Falwell's hate-propaganda.
Just SOAK up that hate-jargon like a GOOD little mindless RRR
cult lemming!! (LOL!!!! You cultic nitwits are a total joke!! And
are FAST gaining stature as America's National Laughingstock.)
...and we have people suing to marry more than one partner
and to marry their pets, etc..
Yeah. JUST as we saw happen after interracial marriage
became universally legal in the USA, in 1967, right? Many people
as loony as you are were shrieking that the sky was falling THEN,
too.
Sound fantastic and hard to believe?
Actually, I couldn't care less. UNLIKE you, I'm NOT a mindless
and ludicrous BUSYBODY.
People in Utah are already suing, based on the Lawrence
case, which the court decided in favor of, that homosexual
marriage in Constitutional.
Good! I hope they WIN!
Look to the Netherlands, where homosexual marriage is
legal and you'll find lawsuits based on those cases, in which
people are actually suing to marry animals and in groups and
relatives. These are the facts. Look it up for yourselves.
Big deal. Obviously you have us egalitarians confused with
people who would GIVE a rat's ***** for your bigotries.
So when someone like you says no harm would be done,
you're lying and we both know it.
Wrong. All of the LYING in here has been done by YOU, and
same-sex marriage is 100% harmless.
And who will end up suffering the most? The children, who
cannot even count on what a family is.
Every child will recognize that which constitutes HIS/HER
family, and that is ALL that counts. Thus, NO suffering. On
ANYONE'S part.
WHICH, of course, would put *me* in the category [in HIS
retarded opinion] of being a person who lacks the "brains or
ability to author a website.")
So if you're HONEST, Wolfie (**THAT'LL** be the day!!), you'll
go to ANY supermarket in America this week, and pick up a copy
of THIS week's issue of "Woman's World" Magazine, at the
checkout counter. (The July 27, 2004 issue.) The story in the first
column, on page 40, 1/3 of the way down, covers TWO things
that I authored, 100% -- my perennially-well-selling book, AND
my website.
THEN -- **IF** you were honest, you'd go to the meat department
and see if they have any nice, fresh CROW in stock, so that you
could eat an **appropriate** meal for a change.
But since you're NOT an honest person... or even, for that matter,
an even marginally-intelligent person... you wouldn't do that, even if
that supermarket WERE to have crow on sale.
Socially-retarded bigots like you will always be with us, unfortun-
ately. But fortunately, only in SMALL numbers. For example, look
at today's KKK -- 40 years after the demise of segregation -- on the
brink of total extinction. THAT is the ultimate fate of today's
homophobes/Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
Your pathetic and hateful ilk will NOT be missed.
Not even slightly.
And eventually will be FORGOTTEN.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude & Sandra" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
22 Jul 2004 08:53:04 AM |
|
|
"GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:4106bd56.34184087@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:38:12 -0400,
PSEUDO-Pastor Dave <pastordave38@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> ((GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) wrote:
Ignorant Bigot, William J. Wolfe
<w_j_wolfe2oo3@yahoo.com> spewed
"seth72" <seth72@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
My guess is someone here guessed the password and deleted
it. Too bad, I made another one and the password isn't so easy to
guess this time. The last one WAS simple to guess.
You lying little poofter. You never had a web site and you
don't have the brains or the ability to author a web site. Stick
to playing with yourself, little ***** eater, it's the one thing that
you can do.
ROTFL!!!!!
(There goes Wolfie, making a TOTAL, bigoted and socially-
retarded ***** of himself again.
Situation normal.
The above being from a person who has proven on countless
occasions that he's too bone-DUMB to be able to distinguish between
folks who are gay and those who comprise the gays' 100 million-plus
"straight" ALLIES of the gay community in its quest for full ACCESS to
the EQUAL rights that they have always been entitled to. And thus
is so abusmally stupid as not to have figured out yet that I am one of
that 100 million-plus "straights."
There is no denial of equal rights by saying homosexuals
cannot marry.
Yes, there most certainly IS. If there weren't, we wouldn't be
seing a collection of hateful loons running around flapping their
arms and screeching for a Bigotry Amendment with which to
pollute and poison the Constitution.
One does not put on a Jets uniform and demand to be
able to play with the team, just because one wants to
and then claim a denial of equal rights. There is a
definition as to what a Jet is.
And there is NO legal definition of marriage in the Constitution
that would EXCLUDE gays from marrying their same-sex partners.
And the morons who SEEK to exclude them are loathsome bigots
who are without excuse.
One who is white does not demand a government loan on
the basis of being a minority and then claim that they are being
denied their equal rights when they are denied. There is a
definition of what a minority is.
Yeah. ANY group of people who do not constitute the
MAJORITY of people in the given category.
In the same way, there is a definition of what a marriage is.
It is one man and one woman. Homosexuals do not qualify,
by definition.
In YOUR **bigoted** opinion. What utter bullcrap!! See my
first paragraph, above.
Besides this, the agenda of the homosexual movement...
Did you regard the FIRST Civil Rights Movement, 40+ years
ago, to be an "agenda?" Sheeesh!!! What total LOSERS you
and your hateful & bigoted ilk are!
...is not to have marriage, but to abolish it...
What a blatant LIE, **pseudo**-pastor. Aren't you aware that
there is a COMMANDMENT against that? (And NO command-
ments about homosexuality, BTW.)
CHALLENGE: Tell us just ONE way that ANY heterosexual
couple's marriage would be harmed in ANY way if a same-sex
couple somewhere got married. Just ONE. (Or be man enough
to ADMIT your abject stupidity!)
...and once marriage is granted for them, then the flood
gates open...
Ah. Wording taken directly from Falwell's hate-propaganda.
Just SOAK up that hate-jargon like a GOOD little mindless RRR
cult lemming!! (LOL!!!! You cultic nitwits are a total joke!! And
are FAST gaining stature as America's National Laughingstock.)
...and we have people suing to marry more than one partner
and to marry their pets, etc..
Yeah. JUST as we saw happen after interracial marriage
became universally legal in the USA, in 1967, right? Many people
as loony as you are were shrieking that the sky was falling THEN,
too.
Sound fantastic and hard to believe?
Actually, I couldn't care less. UNLIKE you, I'm NOT a mindless
and ludicrous BUSYBODY.
People in Utah are already suing, based on the Lawrence
case, which the court decided in favor of, that homosexual
marriage in Constitutional.
Good! I hope they WIN!
Look to the Netherlands, where homosexual marriage is
legal and you'll find lawsuits based on those cases, in which
people are actually suing to marry animals and in groups and
relatives. These are the facts. Look it up for yourselves.
Big deal. Obviously you have us egalitarians confused with
people who would GIVE a rat's ***** for your bigotries.
He's only HALF informed... as usual. Look at this link:
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:YlgQwOx4cWcJ:www.contemporaryfamilies.org/media/same%2520sex%2520marriage%2520briefing%2520paper.htm+%22Netherlands%22%22marriage+rights%22&hl=en
What Dave does is look at ONLY the apologist sites and doesn't bother to see
what responses the opposing sites say. That ALWAYS leaves him looking
stupid. P.S. Take a hint, Dave. If you want to be a better debator, look
at the opposing view points. You probably don't look because you feel it
doesn't deserve your time and you're SO convinced of your "rightness."
So when someone like you says no harm would be done,
you're lying and we both know it.
Wrong. All of the LYING in here has been done by YOU, and
same-sex marriage is 100% harmless.
And who will end up suffering the most? The children, who
cannot even count on what a family is.
Every child will recognize that which constitutes HIS/HER
family, and that is ALL that counts. Thus, NO suffering. On
ANYONE'S part.
WHICH, of course, would put *me* in the category [in HIS
retarded opinion] of being a person who lacks the "brains or
ability to author a website.")
So if you're HONEST, Wolfie (**THAT'LL** be the day!!), you'll
go to ANY supermarket in America this week, and pick up a copy
of THIS week's issue of "Woman's World" Magazine, at the
checkout counter. (The July 27, 2004 issue.) The story in the first
column, on page 40, 1/3 of the way down, covers TWO things
that I authored, 100% -- my perennially-well-selling book, AND
my website.
THEN -- **IF** you were honest, you'd go to the meat department
and see if they have any nice, fresh CROW in stock, so that you
could eat an **appropriate** meal for a change.
But since you're NOT an honest person... or even, for that matter,
an even marginally-intelligent person... you wouldn't do that, even if
that supermarket WERE to have crow on sale.
Socially-retarded bigots like you will always be with us, unfortun-
ately. But fortunately, only in SMALL numbers. For example, look
at today's KKK -- 40 years after the demise of segregation -- on the
brink of total extinction. THAT is the ultimate fate of today's
homophobes/Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists.
Your pathetic and hateful ilk will NOT be missed.
Not even slightly.
And eventually will be FORGOTTEN.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
23 Jul 2004 08:05:38 PM |
|
|
While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:39:21 GMT,
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) screamed out:
--
± Pastor Dave ±
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor to follow thee: neither
have I desired the woeful day; thou knowest: that which came out of my lips
was right before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is
the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/}
@#####{]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\}
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
23 Jul 2004 10:16:24 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 03:05:38 +0200 (CEST),
PSEUDO-Pastor Dave <pastordave38@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- NOTHING of substance. (What an idiot. Or else it
was the loser who's been forging him.)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
23 Jul 2004 09:30:52 AM |
|
|
While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:39:21 GMT,
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) screamed out:
There is no denial of equal rights by saying homosexuals
cannot marry.
Yes, there most certainly IS. If there weren't, we wouldn't be
seing a collection of hateful loons running around flapping their
arms and screeching for a Bigotry Amendment with which to
pollute and poison the Constitution.
You must be looking in the mirror. I'm not the one who
constantly uses name calling and shouting in my
messages regarding this issue, which only shows us that
you have no argument to make. It seems that you're the
one "flapping your arms and screeching bigotry".
One does not put on a Jets uniform and demand to be
able to play with the team, just because one wants to
and then claim a denial of equal rights. There is a
definition as to what a Jet is.
And there is NO legal definition of marriage in the Constitution
that would EXCLUDE gays from marrying their same-sex partners.
And the morons who SEEK to exclude them are loathsome bigots
who are without excuse.
Marriage has always been one man and one woman and
homosexuals claiming marriage has never been normative
in any society in history and those that did cater to
this lifestyle are long in ruins. Those who upheld the
traditional family prospered until they did not uphold
the traditional family. The family unit is the fabric
of society. Now that we see the family declining, look
what's been happening to the moral fabric of this
country. Those are facts, whether you like it or not.
One who is white does not demand a government loan on
the basis of being a minority and then claim that they are being
denied their equal rights when they are denied. There is a
definition of what a minority is.
Yeah. ANY group of people who do not constitute the
MAJORITY of people in the given category.
Wrong. Minorities are listed by legal definition.
There are areas where white people are the minority and
yet, they do not receive minority benefits.
In the same way, there is a definition of what a marriage is.
It is one man and one woman. Homosexuals do not qualify,
by definition.
In YOUR **bigoted** opinion. What utter bullcrap!! See my
first paragraph, above.
It's not an opinion. It's a fact. A fact you may not
like, but a fact none-the-less. If it weren't a fact,
then we would not have gays suing to marry, so the fact
that you're here shouting about this subject, proves
your statement in error and you contradict yourself.
Besides this, the agenda of the homosexual movement...
Did you regard the FIRST Civil Rights Movement, 40+ years
ago, to be an "agenda?" Sheeesh!!! What total LOSERS you
and your hateful & bigoted ilk are!
Trying to equate gay marriage with the civil rights
movement is a slap in the face to the black people.
And it's funny you should mention it. The fact is,
that the spokesman for the largest coalition of
supporters for the Federal Marriage Amendment, is
Walter Fauntroy, a civil rights leader who marched with
Martin Luther King Jr. in the 60's. So your argument
is deflated once again.
...is not to have marriage, but to abolish it...
What a blatant LIE, **pseudo**-pastor.
It's not a lie. It's a fact and the people can
research it for themselves.
CHALLENGE: Tell us just ONE way that ANY heterosexual
couple's marriage would be harmed in ANY way if a same-sex
couple somewhere got married. Just ONE. (Or be man enough
to ADMIT your abject stupidity!)
Whether ot not you harm an individual marriage is
irrelevant. It is the society that is the concern.
Shooting the guy down the street doesn't harm my house.
Yet it is a concern for the society and having a
murderer running around, whether he kills me or not, is
not something to support. Rather, it needs to be
stopped, so that argument is bogus as well.
...and once marriage is granted for them, then the flood
gates open...
Ah. Wording taken directly from Falwell's hate-propaganda.
No, it's a fact that can be and is demonstrated in Utah
right now. It is also demonstrated to the extreme, in
the Netherlands, where gay marriage has been legal for
a while. Based on those cases, people there and here,
are suing to be able to have multiple partners of both
sexes, which is not called "polygamy", but rather, the
new word is, "polyamorous" and they wish to call it a
marriage. People in the Netherlands are now suing to
marry animals, based on this same case. Once it is
legalized, it takes the power of the court away, to say
what is and isn't a valid marriage, since marriage
then, will have no definition, as it does now, which is
one man and one woman. So the claim that I am
parroting Falwell is deflated as well. I don't even
watch the man.
Just SOAK up that hate-jargon like a GOOD little mindless RRR
cult lemming!! (LOL!!!! You cultic nitwits are a total joke!! And
are FAST gaining stature as America's National Laughingstock.)
And there it is. You know you don't have an argument,
so all you do is call people names and spit out hatred.
Then you claim it is those in support of traditional
marriage who hate. Let it be noted that your words of
hate are recorded here, for all to see.
...and we have people suing to marry more than one partner
and to marry their pets, etc..
Yeah. JUST as we saw happen after interracial marriage
became universally legal in the USA, in 1967, right? Many people
as loony as you are were shrieking that the sky was falling THEN,
too.
Dodging the point doesn't help your case. I stated a
fact. Now you are equating marrying animals to folks
of different colors marrying. You prove here for all
to see, that you are a supporter of people marrying
animals, by using the example that you did. You now
put that on par with color, trying to make it also, a
civil rights issue. Contrary to your opinion, civil
rights does not equal doing whatever you want to do.
Sound fantastic and hard to believe?
Actually, I couldn't care less. UNLIKE you, I'm NOT a mindless
and ludicrous BUSYBODY.
We know you could not care less. Morality is not your
strong suit, neither is fair play.
People in Utah are already suing, based on the Lawrence
case, which the court decided in favor of, that homosexual
marriage in Constitutional.
Good! I hope they WIN!
Thank you for proving that you also, have an agenda,
which is not just homosexual marriage, but rather, a
broader scope of trying to destroy marriage altogether.
Now tell us what a good Christian you are. Oh and
don't forget to tell how Jesus said to love everybody.
Look to the Netherlands, where homosexual marriage is
legal and you'll find lawsuits based on those cases, in which
people are actually suing to marry animals and in groups and
relatives. These are the facts. Look it up for yourselves.
Big deal. Obviously you have us egalitarians confused with
people who would GIVE a rat's ***** for your bigotries.
Thank you for once again proving my point.
So when someone like you says no harm would be done,
you're lying and we both know it.
Wrong. All of the LYING in here has been done by YOU, and
same-sex marriage is 100% harmless.
Wrong again. It causes harm to society as a whole.
And who will end up suffering the most? The children, who
cannot even count on what a family is.
Every child will recognize that which constitutes HIS/HER
family, and that is ALL that counts. Thus, NO suffering. On
ANYONE'S part.
No, they won't and that's the problem. With multiple
partners and an adoption and no fault divorce, what
happens to the child? And what about a person marrying
an animal? Does the child call the animal Mom, or Dad?
--
± Pastor Dave Raymond ±
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor
to follow thee: neither have I desired the woeful day;
thou knowest: that which came out of my lips was right
before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"If something in science suddenly becomes
so sacrosanct that you can't question it,
then it ceases to be science," he said.
"And I really think that's what's become
of Darwinism." - Roger DeHart
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude & Sandra" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
23 Jul 2004 11:16:21 AM |
|
|
"Pastor Dave" <nospam*-*pastordave38@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:n372g09t4uhjkhrmtiv8drim4ssgf12pa5@4ax.com...
While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:39:21 GMT,
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) screamed out:
There is no denial of equal rights by saying homosexuals
cannot marry.
Yes, there most certainly IS. If there weren't, we wouldn't be
seing a collection of hateful loons running around flapping their
arms and screeching for a Bigotry Amendment with which to
pollute and poison the Constitution.
You must be looking in the mirror. I'm not the one who
constantly uses name calling and shouting in my
messages regarding this issue, which only shows us that
you have no argument to make. It seems that you're the
one "flapping your arms and screeching bigotry".
So what if he uses name calling within the context of his passionate posts?
According to the gospels, Jesus called the Pharasees names and insulted them
quite well.
If a post is JUST nasty troll like words, THAT'S a difference. It's a matter
of degree of acceptability and is not about either all or nothing.
One does not put on a Jets uniform and demand to be
able to play with the team, just because one wants to
and then claim a denial of equal rights. There is a
definition as to what a Jet is.
And there is NO legal definition of marriage in the Constitution
that would EXCLUDE gays from marrying their same-sex partners.
And the morons who SEEK to exclude them are loathsome bigots
who are without excuse.
Marriage has always been one man and one woman and
homosexuals claiming marriage has never been normative
in any society in history and those that did cater to
this lifestyle are long in ruins. Those who upheld the
traditional family prospered until they did not uphold
the traditional family. The family unit is the fabric
of society. Now that we see the family declining, look
what's been happening to the moral fabric of this
country. Those are facts, whether you like it or not.
One who is white does not demand a government loan on
the basis of being a minority and then claim that they are being
denied their equal rights when they are denied. There is a
definition of what a minority is.
Yeah. ANY group of people who do not constitute the
MAJORITY of people in the given category.
Wrong. Minorities are listed by legal definition.
There are areas where white people are the minority and
yet, they do not receive minority benefits.
In the same way, there is a definition of what a marriage is.
It is one man and one woman. Homosexuals do not qualify,
by definition.
In YOUR **bigoted** opinion. What utter bullcrap!! See my
first paragraph, above.
It's not an opinion. It's a fact. A fact you may not
like, but a fact none-the-less. If it weren't a fact,
then we would not have gays suing to marry, so the fact
that you're here shouting about this subject, proves
your statement in error and you contradict yourself.
Besides this, the agenda of the homosexual movement...
Did you regard the FIRST Civil Rights Movement, 40+ years
ago, to be an "agenda?" Sheeesh!!! What total LOSERS you
and your hateful & bigoted ilk are!
Trying to equate gay marriage with the civil rights
movement is a slap in the face to the black people.
And it's funny you should mention it. The fact is,
that the spokesman for the largest coalition of
supporters for the Federal Marriage Amendment, is
Walter Fauntroy, a civil rights leader who marched with
Martin Luther King Jr. in the 60's. So your argument
is deflated once again.
...is not to have marriage, but to abolish it...
What a blatant LIE, **pseudo**-pastor.
It's not a lie. It's a fact and the people can
research it for themselves.
CHALLENGE: Tell us just ONE way that ANY heterosexual
couple's marriage would be harmed in ANY way if a same-sex
couple somewhere got married. Just ONE. (Or be man enough
to ADMIT your abject stupidity!)
Whether ot not you harm an individual marriage is
irrelevant. It is the society that is the concern.
Shooting the guy down the street doesn't harm my house.
Yet it is a concern for the society and having a
murderer running around, whether he kills me or not, is
not something to support. Rather, it needs to be
stopped, so that argument is bogus as well.
...and once marriage is granted for them, then the flood
gates open...
Ah. Wording taken directly from Falwell's hate-propaganda.
No, it's a fact that can be and is demonstrated in Utah
right now. It is also demonstrated to the extreme, in
the Netherlands, where gay marriage has been legal for
a while. Based on those cases, people there and here,
are suing to be able to have multiple partners of both
sexes, which is not called "polygamy", but rather, the
new word is, "polyamorous" and they wish to call it a
marriage. People in the Netherlands are now suing to
marry animals, based on this same case. Once it is
legalized, it takes the power of the court away, to say
what is and isn't a valid marriage, since marriage
then, will have no definition, as it does now, which is
one man and one woman. So the claim that I am
parroting Falwell is deflated as well. I don't even
watch the man.
Just SOAK up that hate-jargon like a GOOD little mindless RRR
cult lemming!! (LOL!!!! You cultic nitwits are a total joke!! And
are FAST gaining stature as America's National Laughingstock.)
And there it is. You know you don't have an argument,
so all you do is call people names and spit out hatred.
Then you claim it is those in support of traditional
marriage who hate. Let it be noted that your words of
hate are recorded here, for all to see.
...and we have people suing to marry more than one partner
and to marry their pets, etc..
Yeah. JUST as we saw happen after interracial marriage
became universally legal in the USA, in 1967, right? Many people
as loony as you are were shrieking that the sky was falling THEN,
too.
Dodging the point doesn't help your case. I stated a
fact. Now you are equating marrying animals to folks
of different colors marrying. You prove here for all
to see, that you are a supporter of people marrying
animals, by using the example that you did. You now
put that on par with color, trying to make it also, a
civil rights issue. Contrary to your opinion, civil
rights does not equal doing whatever you want to do.
Sound fantastic and hard to believe?
Actually, I couldn't care less. UNLIKE you, I'm NOT a mindless
and ludicrous BUSYBODY.
We know you could not care less. Morality is not your
strong suit, neither is fair play.
People in Utah are already suing, based on the Lawrence
case, which the court decided in favor of, that homosexual
marriage in Constitutional.
Good! I hope they WIN!
Thank you for proving that you also, have an agenda,
which is not just homosexual marriage, but rather, a
broader scope of trying to destroy marriage altogether.
Now tell us what a good Christian you are. Oh and
don't forget to tell how Jesus said to love everybody.
Look to the Netherlands, where homosexual marriage is
legal and you'll find lawsuits based on those cases, in which
people are actually suing to marry animals and in groups and
relatives. These are the facts. Look it up for yourselves.
Big deal. Obviously you have us egalitarians confused with
people who would GIVE a rat's ***** for your bigotries.
Thank you for once again proving my point.
So when someone like you says no harm would be done,
you're lying and we both know it.
Wrong. All of the LYING in here has been done by YOU, and
same-sex marriage is 100% harmless.
Wrong again. It causes harm to society as a whole.
And who will end up suffering the most? The children, who
cannot even count on what a family is.
Every child will recognize that which constitutes HIS/HER
family, and that is ALL that counts. Thus, NO suffering. On
ANYONE'S part.
No, they won't and that's the problem. With multiple
partners and an adoption and no fault divorce, what
happens to the child? And what about a person marrying
an animal? Does the child call the animal Mom, or Dad?
--
± Pastor Dave Raymond ±
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor
to follow thee: neither have I desired the woeful day;
thou knowest: that which came out of my lips was right
before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"If something in science suddenly becomes
so sacrosanct that you can't question it,
then it ceases to be science," he said.
"And I really think that's what's become
of Darwinism." - Roger DeHart
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aaron" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
22 Jul 2004 01:26:11 PM |
|
|
i just want you to know that you are the most angry and hate filled
person i have ever had the misfortune to encounter. how do you feel
that shrieking insults and calling people bigots left and right
validates your opinion? in all honesty, i would have to say that you
are the most bigoted person that i have seen post here. your attitude
and mindless babble is ugly and unbecoming of you. next time you want
to make a point, try using reason and coherent speech as opposed to
personal slurs and slogans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
22 Jul 2004 05:23:11 PM |
|
|
On 22 Jul 2004 11:26:11 -0700,
Illiterate Bigot, Aaron <Sythe100@yahoo.com> wrote:
i just want you to know that you are the most angry and hate
filled person i have ever had the misfortune to encounter.
Yeah. Bigots tend to feel that way about me. Of course, that's
because they are so bone-ignorant, they wouldn't know a FACT
if it were an anvil and it landed on their foot. (Especially the ones
who are SO dumb as to be illiterate enough to not know how to
employ capital letters on proper nouns.)
People who DO recognize facts have NO problem seeing that
I am a staunch DEFENDER of individual liberties against TRULY
hateful turds like *you* who have no lives.
Since I'm in Usenet as a fair-minded and compassionate
defender of people's rights, this means that I clearly don't give a
flying rat's ***** WHAT ignorant losers like you may think you me.
I **am**, however, very GLAD when I see that hateful sociopaths
like you have a low opinion of me. It's just more verification that
i'm doing my job RIGHT.
If you **agreed** with me -- THEN I'd be worried!
<remaining trollish lies flushed>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
25 Jul 2004 09:55:27 PM |
|
|
On 23 Jul 2004 16:33:42 GMT,
"Reptile944" <reptile944@aol.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> (GOOD RIDDANCE on
Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) wrote:
People who DO recognize facts have NO problem seeing that
I am a staunch DEFENDER of individual liberties against TRULY
hateful turds like *you* who have no lives.
Since I'm in Usenet as a fair-minded and compassionate
defender of people's rights, this means that I clearly don't give a
flying rat's ***** WHAT ignorant losers like you may think of me.
I **am**, however, very GLAD when I see that hateful sociopaths
like you have a low opinion of me. It's just more verification that
I'm doing my job RIGHT.
If you **agreed** with me -- THEN I'd be worried!
Well stated, Craig.
Thanks! And, BTW, please don't think I've been ignoring any of
your posts, for lack of my responses. As you probably remember, I
*reside* in alt.abortion (and also, for the last several months, in
alt.politics.homosexuality, as a "straight" ALLY of theirs in their
quest for the end of DENIAL to them of all the EQUAL rights to which
they have always been legally entitled.) So I was able to see this
post today because I visited talk.abortion. (Your posts haven't
appeared in alt.abortion, so I unfortunately miss out on seeing most
of them.)
Thanks again for the kind words!
(Oh. BTW -- lately I've observed that some of the AOL folks have
been putting up posts with *crosspostings*. So evidently AOL has
finally corrected that shortcoming. Just a head's up in case you
weren't yet aware of that. If you so desire, we'll WELCOME you
astute and egalitarian crossposts to alt.abortion!) (At least, our
**sensible** posters, there, will. :) )
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
23 Jul 2004 09:33:37 AM |
|
|
While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:23:11 GMT,
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) screamed out:
On 22 Jul 2004 11:26:11 -0700,
Illiterate Bigot, Aaron <Sythe100@yahoo.com> wrote:
i just want you to know that you are the most angry and hate
filled person i have ever had the misfortune to encounter. how do you feel
that shrieking insults and calling people bigots left and right
validates your opinion? in all honesty, i would have to say that you
are the most bigoted person that i have seen post here. your attitude
and mindless babble is ugly and unbecoming of you. next time you want
to make a point, try using reason and coherent speech as opposed to
personal slurs and slogans.
Yeah. Bigots tend to feel that way about me.
You just proved his point.
--
± Pastor Dave Raymond ±
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor
to follow thee: neither have I desired the woeful day;
thou knowest: that which came out of my lips was right
before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"In fact, there is a great deal more to the
creation/evolution controversy than meets the eye,
or rather than meets the carefully cultivated media
stereotype of 'creationists' as Bible quoting know
nothings who refuse to face up to the scientific
evidence. The creationists may be wrong about many
things, but they have at least one very important
point to argue, a point that has been thoroughly
obscured by all the attention paid to Noah's Flood
and other side issues. What science educators
propose to teach as 'evolution' and label it as fact,
is based not upon any incontrovertible empirical
evidence (scientifically proven facts, ed.), but upon
a highly controversial philosophical presupposition.
The controversy over evolution is therefore not going
to go away as people become better educated on the
subject. On the contrary, the more people learn
about the philosophical content of what scientists
are calling the 'fact of evolution', the less they
are going to like it." - Philip E. Johnson, Evolution
as Dogma: The Establishment of Naturalism
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
23 Jul 2004 08:06:36 PM |
|
|
While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:23:11 GMT,
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) screamed out:
hello
--
± Pastor Dave ±
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor to follow thee: neither
have I desired the woeful day; thou knowest: that which came out of my lips
was right before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is
the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/}
@#####{]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\}
.
|
|
|
| User: "GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
23 Jul 2004 10:14:54 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 03:06:36 +0200 (CEST),
PSEUDO-Pastor Dave <pastordave38@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- NOTHING of substance. (What an idiot. Or else it
was the loser who's been forging him.)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
(REAL name and e-mail address, lest any bigot wrongly
think I'm hiding behind an a alias. The "alias," above,
is designed to be a visible MESSAGE, each time I post.)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
INSIGHT on our Warmonger-in-Thief ---
http://homepage.mac.com/webmasterkai/kaicurry/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
AND...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
ALSO worth a look:
http://anon.newmediamill.speedera.net/anon.newmediamill/pledge_acc/index.html
And... here's what happens to people like you & me:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/21/antiwar.soldier.ap/index.html
However, the same rules don't apply to the "Elite:"
www.awolbush.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Blow" |
|
| Title: Re: "WOLFIE" Once Again PROVES Just How DUMB Bigots Truly Are. |
22 Jul 2004 01:31:51 PM |
|
|
Pastor Dave <nospam*-*pastordave38@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<3e9vf09am4448pmjumvn98islp5l1h6588@4ax.com>...
While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:44:36 GMT,
(GOOD RIDDANCE on Nov. 2nd to Dishonest
Warmonger-in-Thief G.W. Bush!) screamed out:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:29:27 -0700,
Ignorant Bigot, William J. Wolfe
<w_j_wolfe2oo3@yahoo.com> spewed
"seth72" <seth72@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
My guess is someone here guessed the password and deleted
it. Too bad, I made another one and the password isn't so easy to
guess this time. The last one WAS simple to guess.
You lying little poofter. You never had a web site and you
don't have the brains or the ability to author a web site. Stick
to playing with yourself, little ***** eater, it's the one thing that
you can do.
ROTFL!!!!!
(There goes Wolfie, making a TOTAL, bigoted and socially-
retarded ***** of himself again.
Situation normal.
The above being from a person who has proven on countless
occasions that he's too bone-DUMB to be able to distinguish between
folks who are gay and those who comprise the gays' 100 million-plus
"straight" ALLIES of the gay community in its quest for full ACCESS to
the EQUAL rights that they have always been entitled to. And thus
is so abusmally stupid as not to have figured out yet that I am one of
that 100 million-plus "straights."
There is no denial of equal rights by saying
homosexuals cannot marry.
How on earth can you conclude that? With all the special
provisions in our society that are attached to the status
of being married, if ignored, you are not addressing the
point.
One does not put on a Jets uniform and demand to be
able to play with the team, just because one wants to
and then claim a denial of equal rights. There is a
definition as to what a Jet is.
There are no governmental rights assigned to the status
of being a Jet.
One who is white does not demand a government loan on
the basis of being a minority and then claim that they
are being denied their equal rights when they are
denied. There is a definition of what a minority is.
Yes.
In the same way, there is a definition of what a
marriage is. It is one man and one woman. Homosexuals
do not qualify, by definition.
Yet many rights that are attached, do not depend on
the pair being of mixed sex.
Besides this, the agenda of the homosexual movement is
not to have marriage, but to abolish it and once
marriage is granted for them, then the flood gates open
and we have people suing to marry more than one partner
and to marry their pets, etc.. Sound fantastic and
hard to believe?
Yes, your bigotry is showing.
People in Utah are already suing,
based on the Lawrence case, which the court decided in
favor of, that homosexual marriage in Constitutional.
Look to the Netherlands, where homosexual marriage is
legal and you'll find lawsuits based on those cases, in
which people are actually suing to marry animals and in
groups and relatives. These are the facts. Look it up
for yourselves. So when someone like you says no harm
would be done, you're lying and we both know it. And
who will end up suffering the most? The children, who
cannot even count on what a family is.
<snip>
Just because a loon sues does not mean they will prevail.
Do not fear the loons.
If you can find a way to detach the legal rights from the
holy state of marriage, you will have solved the problem
(at least in your church). Otherwise, the denial of these
rights appears unconstitutional.
Joe
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
