| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
12 Mar 2005 04:12:35 PM |
| Object: |
women as breeding stock |
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
and, of course, the same mindset which could deny women this right
could use the same misogynist reasoning to force women to abort
i believe it was during the late 80s or early 90s when i first
expressed this opinion on usenet. i have never heard anything to cause
me to change my views.
.
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
15 Mar 2005 04:56:11 PM |
|
|
Sergeant America <sergeant_america@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:42379E00.D4DF05BB@yahoo.com:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
What are you talking about nigg-nogg woman? ***** with your lying
*****, as it causes unwanted pregnancies and abortion.
IOW, ***** *****.
you had christian sex-edication i see.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 07:08:42 AM |
|
|
On 15 Mar 2005 22:56:11 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Sergeant America <sergeant_america@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:42379E00.D4DF05BB@yahoo.com:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
What are you talking about nigg-nogg woman? ***** with your lying
*****, as it causes unwanted pregnancies and abortion.
IOW, ***** *****.
you had christian sex-edication i see.
No - women aren;t stupid enough to ***** _him_.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 01:06:05 PM |
|
|
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in
news:4ubg31l2ooqpaic4cfnnc4r9vu3i60vn52@4ax.com:
On 15 Mar 2005 22:56:11 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Sergeant America <sergeant_america@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:42379E00.D4DF05BB@yahoo.com:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
What are you talking about nigg-nogg woman? ***** with your lying
*****, as it causes unwanted pregnancies and abortion.
IOW, ***** *****.
you had christian sex-edication i see.
No - women aren;t stupid enough to ***** _him_.
exactly.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
13 Mar 2005 04:36:48 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 03:28:09 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
and, of course, the same mindset which could deny women this right
could use the same misogynist reasoning to force women to abort
i believe it was during the late 80s or early 90s when i first
expressed this opinion on usenet. i have never heard anything to cause
me to change my views.
Wow.
How...enlightening.
Never thought that a woman can prevent a pregnancy in the first place far
more easily than she can abort one, have you?
Well once the pregnancy is already in progress, a new set of choice
making avenues pave their way into her life: Abortion or childbirth.
And guess whose decision it is to make those choices?
The problem is, once a woman is pregnant, whether you like it or not, or
whether SHE likes it or not, the physical reality is that there is now at
least one other human life at issue in any decision she makes;
She's the only pregnant one, out of the scenario.
and that,
whether it's fair or not, is simply the way it is, just like it's the 'way
it is' that a man's genetic equipment is a wee bit more vulnerable to blows
than hers. Life sometimes really sucks wind, y'know?
It does, for anti-choicers.
the time to decide whether one should get pregnant is BEFORE...
I agree. But not we're dealing with a situation once pregnancy has
already occurred.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 10:38:59 AM |
|
|
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:4g5831tgpbcmnnfa24kf6as15pohl3re6t@4ax.com...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 03:28:09 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
and, of course, the same mindset which could deny women this right
could use the same misogynist reasoning to force women to abort
i believe it was during the late 80s or early 90s when i first
expressed this opinion on usenet. i have never heard anything to cause
me to change my views.
Wow.
How...enlightening.
Never thought that a woman can prevent a pregnancy in the first place far
more easily than she can abort one, have you?
Well once the pregnancy is already in progress, a new set of choice
making avenues pave their way into her life: Abortion or childbirth.
And guess whose decision it is to make those choices?
The problem is, once a woman is pregnant, whether you like it or not, or
whether SHE likes it or not, the physical reality is that there is now at
least one other human life at issue in any decision she makes;
She's the only pregnant one, out of the scenario.
and that,
whether it's fair or not, is simply the way it is, just like it's the 'way
it is' that a man's genetic equipment is a wee bit more vulnerable to
blows
than hers. Life sometimes really sucks wind, y'know?
It does, for anti-choicers.
the time to decide whether one should get pregnant is BEFORE...
I agree. But not we're dealing with a situation once pregnancy has
already occurred.
The time to deal with horses and barns is BEFORE the door is opened.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 05:03:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:38:59 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:4g5831tgpbcmnnfa24kf6as15pohl3re6t@4ax.com...
I agree. But not we're dealing with a situation once pregnancy has
already occurred.
The time to deal with horses and barns is BEFORE the door is opened.
Which does nothing to help the situation once the doors have opened.
Should have's don't help the present situation (but it is useful for
future situations).
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
15 Mar 2005 09:50:02 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
Anyone who permits and supports women to murder their own child, simply
wants to use women as sex toys, without taking any responsibility for their
actions. If women don't want children, then they shouldn't let these
promiscuous men USE them to satisfy their own lusts and women shouldn't
pretend that men wanting to have sex with them is love by any means, or they
shouldn't be whores and sluts for their own selfish sexual lusts as well,
and begin to have some respect for themselves, so they wouldn't be in the
position to KILL what their own actions have caused the consequences
thereof. So it appears that YOU just want to USE women for your own selfish
lusts, because all you care about is having sex and not about the
consequences of that action.
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
and, of course, the same mindset which could deny women this right
could use the same misogynist reasoning to force women to abort
i believe it was during the late 80s or early 90s when i first
expressed this opinion on usenet. i have never heard anything to cause
me to change my views.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 09:50:16 AM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote in
news:K1OZd.3116$jt6.1946@trndny07:
Anyone who permits and supports women to murder their own child
you posted to the wrong groups. this is an abortion discussion.
[..]
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
18 Mar 2005 02:58:00 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote in
news:K1OZd.3116$jt6.1946@trndny07:
Anyone who permits and supports women to murder their own child
you posted to the wrong groups. this is an abortion discussion.
[..]
Then it was posted to the right group.
"Child n (pl.children) 1 a young human being below the age of puberty
b an unborn or newborn human being 2 one's son or daughter (at any
age) 3 (fol. By of) descendant, follower, adherent, or product of
(children of Israel; child of God; child of nature). 4 a childish
person." The Oxford English Reference Dictionary. Oxford University
Press 1995, 1996. Chief ed. Patrick Hanks, p254.
You don't like to be reminded that a child is killed every abortion.
The dictionary reflects common usgage of a word. So I expect to see
'baby' in the dictionary meaning unborn child as well as born. Look at
most maternity sites and see how often baby is used when referring to
the unborn.
The unborn offspring of human beings are also humans beings, try to
deny this without mentioning tradition, law or 'personhood'. Oh and by
the way, murder isn't strictly a legal term, so saying abortion
murders/kills a child is absolutley correct.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
18 Mar 2005 08:42:46 AM |
|
|
wrote in news:1111136280.224221.165760
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote in
news:K1OZd.3116$jt6.1946@trndny07:
Anyone who permits and supports women to murder their own child
you posted to the wrong groups. this is an abortion discussion.
[..]
Then it was posted to the right group.
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
[...]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
18 Mar 2005 07:21:13 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns961D62BDBD61Akeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
[...]
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns961D62BDBD61Akeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
legend_89@hotmail.com wrote in news:1111136280.224221.165760
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote in
news:K1OZd.3116$jt6.1946@trndny07:
Anyone who permits and supports women to murder their own child
you posted to the wrong groups. this is an abortion discussion.
[..]
Then it was posted to the right group.
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
[...]
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
18 Mar 2005 07:25:16 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:21:13 +0000, Dore wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns961D62BDBD61Akeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
[...]
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
it's good to see that you can fall back on your religious beliefs when you
are devoid of fact.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
23 Mar 2005 06:37:13 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.19.01.25.13.97010@nycap.rr.com...
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
it's good to see that you can fall back on your religious beliefs when you
are devoid of fact.
Honey, what I said IS FACT!
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.19.01.25.13.97010@nycap.rr.com...
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:21:13 +0000, Dore wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns961D62BDBD61Akeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
[...]
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
it's good to see that you can fall back on your religious beliefs when you
are devoid of fact.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
25 Mar 2005 12:03:28 AM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.19.01.25.13.97010@nycap.rr.com...
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
it's good to see that you can fall back on your religious beliefs when you
are devoid of fact.
Honey, what I said IS FACT!
Most of the readers aren't interested what the voices in your head tell you.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Utah 2 (March 23)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 25 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
24 Mar 2005 06:26:05 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:37:13 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.19.01.25.13.97010@nycap.rr.com...
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
it's good to see that you can fall back on your religious beliefs when you
are devoid of fact.
Honey, what I said IS FACT!
No, what you offered is a rant with the stink potency of a raunchy
fart.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
24 Mar 2005 09:21:42 PM |
|
|
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:tdc5415c9k5foft5v58gf76ptlu5vjpk2h@4ax.com...
No, what you offered is a rant with the stink potency of a raunchy
fart.
Wow, wasn't that a mature and an intelligent response?
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:tdc5415c9k5foft5v58gf76ptlu5vjpk2h@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:37:13 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.19.01.25.13.97010@nycap.rr.com...
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
it's good to see that you can fall back on your religious beliefs when
you
are devoid of fact.
Honey, what I said IS FACT!
No, what you offered is a rant with the stink potency of a raunchy
fart.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
25 Mar 2005 02:59:58 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:21:42 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:tdc5415c9k5foft5v58gf76ptlu5vjpk2h@4ax.com...
No, what you offered is a rant with the stink potency of a raunchy
fart.
Wow, wasn't that a mature and an intelligent response?
In response to this grabage, it is:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:37:13 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.19.01.25.13.97010@nycap.rr.com...
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
it's good to see that you can fall back on your religious beliefs when you
are devoid of fact.
Honey, what I said IS FACT!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
19 Mar 2005 03:23:57 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:21:13 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns961D62BDBD61Akeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
[...]
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
After you...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
23 Mar 2005 06:38:21 PM |
|
|
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:436p31t4ufgp95pgo61bt22qajd26tjrm2@4ax.com...
After you...
Dearie, I am the JUDGE, it is my judgments of your actions, thoughts, mind,
souls, spirits and desires that gets you condemned. You don't know who you
are talking to.
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:436p31t4ufgp95pgo61bt22qajd26tjrm2@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:21:13 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns961D62BDBD61Akeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
[...]
Your unborn child murderous attitude will gain you hellfire..
After you...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
25 Mar 2005 12:08:27 AM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> writes:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:436p31t4ufgp95pgo61bt22qajd26tjrm2@4ax.com...
After you...
Dearie, I am the JUDGE, it is my judgments of your actions, thoughts, mind,
souls, spirits and desires that gets you condemned. You don't know who you
are talking to.
Yep, another cafeteria Christian who ignores Matthew 7:1-2...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Utah 2 (March 23)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 25 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
24 Mar 2005 06:26:50 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:38:21 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:436p31t4ufgp95pgo61bt22qajd26tjrm2@4ax.com...
After you...
Dearie, I am the JUDGE...
No, you're a mentally infirmed woman in immediate need of extensive
professional help.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
24 Mar 2005 09:23:27 PM |
|
|
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2fc541tpurm4bk1363sek617446ota1j7d@4ax.com...
Dearie, I am the JUDGE...
No, you're a mentally infirmed woman in immediate need of extensive
professional help.
HAHAHAHA, professional help from WHOM? Ungodly men of medical science who
haven't a clue about anything in the spiritual realm? How can wicked,
ignorant people help me or anyone for that matter? God is my helper and
deliverer, what could mere mortals do for me?
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2fc541tpurm4bk1363sek617446ota1j7d@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:38:21 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:436p31t4ufgp95pgo61bt22qajd26tjrm2@4ax.com...
After you...
Dearie, I am the JUDGE...
No, you're a mentally infirmed woman in immediate need of extensive
professional help.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
25 Mar 2005 12:09:54 AM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> writes:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2fc541tpurm4bk1363sek617446ota1j7d@4ax.com...
Dearie, I am the JUDGE...
No, you're a mentally infirmed woman in immediate need of extensive
professional help.
HAHAHAHA, professional help from WHOM? Ungodly men of medical science who
haven't a clue about anything in the spiritual realm? How can wicked,
ignorant people help me or anyone for that matter? God is my helper and
deliverer, what could mere mortals do for me?
You should know -- since you're one of those mere mortals, remember?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Utah 2 (March 23)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 25 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
25 Mar 2005 02:55:10 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:23:27 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:2fc541tpurm4bk1363sek617446ota1j7d@4ax.com...
Dearie, I am the JUDGE...
No, you're a mentally infirmed woman in immediate need of extensive
professional help.
HAHAHAHA, professional help from WHOM? Ungodly men...
Why do you bother staying alive?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
25 Mar 2005 12:09:00 AM |
|
|
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:38:21 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:436p31t4ufgp95pgo61bt22qajd26tjrm2@4ax.com...
After you...
Dearie, I am the JUDGE...
No, you're a mentally infirmed woman in immediate need of extensive
professional help.
....and a straitjacket.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Utah 2 (March 23)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 25 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
18 Mar 2005 07:37:11 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
legend_89@hotmail.com wrote in news:1111136280.224221.165760
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote in
news:K1OZd.3116$jt6.1946@trndny07:
Anyone who permits and supports women to murder their own child
you posted to the wrong groups. this is an abortion discussion.
[..]
Then it was posted to the right group.
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
*shrug* Thats was about the best response you could come up with. No
use debating against facts when you know you are wrong hey?
Fact - human development is a CONTINUOUS process from fertilisation
'till natural death. And just because you don't like it doesn't make it
true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
19 Mar 2005 08:14:32 AM |
|
|
In article <1111196231.254150.234520@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
legend_89@hotmail.com says...
Fact - human development is a CONTINUOUS process from fertilisation
(from before fertilisation, actually).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sergeant America" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
20 Mar 2005 08:55:07 AM |
|
|
Pro-abortionist Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <1111196231.254150.234520@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
legend_89@hotmail.com says...
*shrug* Thats was about the best response you could come up with. No
use debating against facts when you know you are wrong hey?
Fact - human development is a CONTINUOUS process from fertilisation
'till natural death. And just because you don't like it doesn't make it
true.
(from before fertilisation, actually).
How did you figure that out, Idiot? You refer to biological processes
yet you seem to have a complete lack of understanding of what they are.
The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology4 (pp 2-18):
"Zygote: this cell results from the union of an oocyte and a sperm. A
zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo). Human
development begins at fertilization, the process during which a male
gamete or sperm ... unites with a female gamete or oocyte ... to form
a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent
cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual."
You're certainly fooling no one, Idiot!
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
19 Mar 2005 07:57:45 PM |
|
|
Sergeant America <sergeant_america@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:423D8ECB.54D7C136@hotmail.com:
Pro-abortionist Pat Winstanley wrote:
i take it you lie about pat's abortion position because you're incapable of
refuting her arguments?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
19 Mar 2005 03:24:17 PM |
|
|
On 18 Mar 2005 17:37:11 -0800, wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
wrote in news:1111136280.224221.165760
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote in
news:K1OZd.3116$jt6.1946@trndny07:
Anyone who permits and supports women to murder their own child
you posted to the wrong groups. this is an abortion discussion.
[..]
Then it was posted to the right group.
your willful ignorance will gain no converts.
*shrug* Thats was about the best response you could come up with.
Pretty damned on the mark, eh?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
