| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
12 Mar 2005 04:12:35 PM |
| Object: |
women as breeding stock |
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
and, of course, the same mindset which could deny women this right
could use the same misogynist reasoning to force women to abort
i believe it was during the late 80s or early 90s when i first
expressed this opinion on usenet. i have never heard anything to cause
me to change my views.
.
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 01:00:53 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c9fb0388146bbea98c303@news.uni-berlin.de...
In article <WpfZd.27194$6g7.11683@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine
Utterly untrue.
You are not in the USA.
No... and despite that you are still wrong. your claim doesn't apply in
the US any more than it does here in the UK.
You clearly don't have the faintest idea what pro-choice people think,
or why - you couldn't be more wrong in your assessment above.
I am glad I can't be more wrong. Thanks.
That hasn't stopped you from continuing to try to be more wrong, though.
Does that mean I can only be less wrong?
You won't be able to accomplish that until you die, from the looks of it --
not that I think that would happen any time soon, nor do I particularly wish
it.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 8, San Antonio 0 (March 12)
NEXT GAME: Monday, March 14 vs. Cincinnati, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 01:33:59 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8y4q6oii.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c9fb0388146bbea98c303@news.uni-berlin.de...
In article <WpfZd.27194$6g7.11683@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine
Utterly untrue.
You are not in the USA.
No... and despite that you are still wrong. your claim doesn't apply in
the US any more than it does here in the UK.
You clearly don't have the faintest idea what pro-choice people think,
or why - you couldn't be more wrong in your assessment above.
I am glad I can't be more wrong. Thanks.
That hasn't stopped you from continuing to try to be more wrong, though.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Genuine.
Does that mean I can only be less wrong?
You won't be able to accomplish that until you die, from the looks of
it --
not that I think that would happen any time soon, nor do I particularly
wish
it.
Thanks, and I hope for your condition to improve so you can do something
else, unless you don't feel like it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
15 Mar 2005 12:30:19 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8y4q6oii.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c9fb0388146bbea98c303@news.uni-berlin.de...
In article <WpfZd.27194$6g7.11683@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit machine
Utterly untrue.
You are not in the USA.
No... and despite that you are still wrong. your claim doesn't apply in
the US any more than it does here in the UK.
You clearly don't have the faintest idea what pro-choice people think,
or why - you couldn't be more wrong in your assessment above.
I am glad I can't be more wrong. Thanks.
That hasn't stopped you from continuing to try to be more wrong, though.
LOL!!!!!!!!!! Genuine.
How about trying something different, like trying to be more right?
Does that mean I can only be less wrong?
You won't be able to accomplish that until you die, from the looks of it --
not that I think that would happen any time soon, nor do I particularly
wish it.
Thanks, and I hope for your condition to improve so you can do something
else, unless you don't feel like it.
It's improving, albeit slowly -- another three or four weeks, and I should be
able to get out and back to work. (While we're on that, could you set your
word wrap to 76? Close to half of your lines come through with just one word,
and that takes more than a little work to format them to make the article
quote a bit neater. I use 76 characters as the default.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Cincinnati 3, Houston 0 (March 14)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, March 16 at Utah, 8:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 12:02:18 PM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
In article <WpfZd.27194$6g7.11683@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit machine
Utterly untrue.
You are not in the USA.
No... and despite that you are still wrong. your claim doesn't apply in
the US any more than it does here in the UK.
That doesn't make any difference to him. He's just typing whatveer comes into
his head.
You clearly don't have the faintest idea what pro-choice people think,
or why - you couldn't be more wrong in your assessment above.
Give him credit. He's trying to be more wrong. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 8, San Antonio 0 (March 12)
NEXT GAME: Monday, March 14 vs. Cincinnati, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 11:54:48 AM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
In article <0F4Zd.16663$c72.12093@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine
Utterly untrue.
Why do you tell such blatant lies?
Do you think it makes you look clever?
I'd settle for determining if he just thinks at all. That's definitely in
doubt at this time.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 8, San Antonio 0 (March 12)
NEXT GAME: Monday, March 14 vs. Cincinnati, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sergeant America" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
15 Mar 2005 09:08:40 AM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <0F4Zd.16663$c72.12093@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine
Utterly untrue.
Why do you tell such blatant lies?
Do you think it makes you look clever?
He's simply rewording what Keegan originally said:
"those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock."
That fact that anti-capitalist people like you ignore the huge profits
in the abortion industry demonstrates your double standard and
deliberate blindness to the nature of the abortion industry and its
incentives.
IOW, you're a blind apologist for people who care for nothing more than
money, and who are cloaking themselves in the kind of propaganda that
you duly repeat here on their behalf.
--
I think I'd rather live in Cuba than the US, as it happens.
-Pat Winstanley
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
15 Mar 2005 01:03:56 AM |
|
|
Sergeant America <sergeant_america@yahoo.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <0F4Zd.16663$c72.12093@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
wxpprofessional@msn.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine
Utterly untrue.
Why do you tell such blatant lies?
Do you think it makes you look clever?
He's simply rewording what Keegan originally said:
"those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock."
That fact that anti-capitalist people like you ignore the huge profits
in the abortion industry demonstrates your double standard and
deliberate blindness to the nature of the abortion industry and its
incentives.
Childbirth costs 15 times as much as abortion and there are four times
as many birth as abortions. That means that childbirth take in 60
times as much money, and that doesn't count the vast amounts of money
spent on baby stufff.
You're still a dumbshit pro-liar.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 12:26:04 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant, and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many billions a year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
Pro-Choice men seem to think that falsely accusing Pro-Lifers of hating
women is somehow going to allow them (Pro-Choice false accuser men) to avoid
responsibility to women and to children.
and, of course, the same mindset which could deny women this right
could use the same misogynist reasoning to force women to abort
Pro-Choice is definitely more mysoginistic than Pro-Life.
i believe it was during the late 80s or early 90s when i first
expressed this opinion on usenet. i have never heard anything to cause
me to change my views.
Who cares?
Pro-Choicers show me by their words and actions that they do not care as
much as Pro-Lifers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 06:30:14 AM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them
better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant,
and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many billions a
year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 12:04:09 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them better.
LOL! Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become
pregnant, and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many billions a
year does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
It is, thanks to whackjobs like you. (I suppose it would be too much to
expect you to come up with any cite to support this latest vision of yours,
though.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 8, San Antonio 0 (March 12)
NEXT GAME: Monday, March 14 vs. Cincinnati, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 09:25:55 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them
better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant,
and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many billions a
year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
Ten billion. And of course, you can back that up? Cite? Hello?
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 12:54:48 PM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4235AD03.1D529C92@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at
any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as
nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them
better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant,
and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many billions a
year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
Ten billion. And of course, you can back that up? Cite? Hello?
RT
If you tie in porno revenues, it is more then ten billion dollars per year.
I am quite sure I read porno takes in like ten billion already.
Not sure though.
Seems like a whole lot of money to me for porno.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 02:28:22 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4235AD03.1D529C92@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at
any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as
nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them
better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant,
and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many billions a
year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
Ten billion. And of course, you can back that up? Cite? Hello?
RT
If you tie in porno revenues, it is more then ten billion dollars per year.
I didn't ask about porno revenues, I ask about your claim that the
"abortion industry profit machine" takes in 10 billion. Can you back
that up? And while you're at it, explain what porno revenues have to
do with the "abortion industry"... (this oughta be good!)
I am quite sure I read porno takes in like ten billion already.
Not sure though.
Seems like a whole lot of money to me for porno.
How much do you usually pay for your porno?
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 11:17:40 PM |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4235AD03.1D529C92@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at
any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as
nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them
better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant,
and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many billions a
year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
Ten billion. And of course, you can back that up? Cite? Hello?
RT
If you tie in porno revenues, it is more then ten billion dollars per year.
I didn't ask about porno revenues, I ask about your claim that the
"abortion industry profit machine" takes in 10 billion. Can you back
that up? And while you're at it, explain what porno revenues have to
do with the "abortion industry"... (this oughta be good!)
Still waiting...
I am quite sure I read porno takes in like ten billion already.
Not sure though.
Seems like a whole lot of money to me for porno.
How much do you usually pay for your porno?
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
17 Mar 2005 06:10:26 AM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:423912F4.A50A67EE@hotmMOVEail.com...
Rich Travsky wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4235AD03.1D529C92@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy
at
any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as
nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love
them
better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion
industry
profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become
pregnant,
and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many
billions a
year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is
easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
Ten billion. And of course, you can back that up? Cite? Hello?
RT
If you tie in porno revenues, it is more then ten billion dollars per
year.
I didn't ask about porno revenues, I ask about your claim that the
"abortion industry profit machine" takes in 10 billion. Can you back
that up? And while you're at it, explain what porno revenues have to
do with the "abortion industry"... (this oughta be good!)
Still waiting...
I already told you.
So, I am not going to tell you anything else.
Underage porno takes in $3 billion a year already.
Do the math, *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
17 Mar 2005 09:03:46 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:423912F4.A50A67EE@hotmMOVEail.com...
Rich Travsky wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4235AD03.1D529C92@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy
at
any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as
nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love
them
better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion
industry
profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become
pregnant,
and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many
billions a
year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is
easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
Ten billion. And of course, you can back that up? Cite? Hello?
RT
If you tie in porno revenues, it is more then ten billion dollars per
year.
I didn't ask about porno revenues, I ask about your claim that the
"abortion industry profit machine" takes in 10 billion. Can you back
that up? And while you're at it, explain what porno revenues have to
do with the "abortion industry"... (this oughta be good!)
Still waiting...
I already told you.
So, I am not going to tell you anything else.
Underage porno takes in $3 billion a year already.
Do the math, *****.
Dear ***** -
No, you haven't told me. Explain what porno revenues have to do
with the "abortion industry profit machine".
It's obvious you let go with a whopper and were hoping no one would
look too closely...
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 10:35:36 AM |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42352E7C.FAEC53EA@hotmMOVEail.com...
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy
at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as
nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love
them
better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion
industry
profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become
pregnant,
and
"abortion industry profit machine" ? HAHAHHAHA! And how many
billions a
year
does that take in? HAHAHAHAH
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not all of it is
easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
Ten billion. And of course, you can back that up? Cite? Hello?
That noise you hear is Johnny running away from your request that he
backup his claim. It's all he ever does.
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 12:40:49 PM |
|
|
Pr0r3p wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
Johnny wrote:
The whole thing and all its associaterd businesses?
In excess of ten billion per year, easy. Well, not
all of it is easy.
Some of of seems kinda risky, actually.
Ten billion. And of course, you can back that up? Cite? Hello?
That noise you hear is Johnny running away from your request
that he backup his claim. It's all he ever does.
pardon me, but isn't asking poor johnny to back up a claim kind of like
asking george bush not to lie? johnny is a "special" case in usenet
newsgroups. apparently he can more or less care for himself. perhaps
there is someone who helps him shop and visit doctors. mayne newsgroups
are part of his therapy. it sems obvious that he's not all there, so to
speak and, while his comments might eb offensive, it's unlikely that he
understands them himself.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 05:06:09 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:26:04 -0700, Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant, and
"abortion industry profit machine" ?
Look at the cost of abortion and the cost of carrying a pregnany to
term, in addition to the eighteen years of caring for the results.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 11:18:51 PM |
|
|
Somewriter wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:26:04 -0700, Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant, and
"abortion industry profit machine" ?
Look at the cost of abortion and the cost of carrying a pregnany to
term, in addition to the eighteen years of caring for the results.
Oh right! ;)
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
17 Mar 2005 05:24:50 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:18:51 -0700, Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Somewriter wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:26:04 -0700, Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant, and
"abortion industry profit machine" ?
Look at the cost of abortion and the cost of carrying a pregnany to
term, in addition to the eighteen years of caring for the results.
Oh right! ;)
RT
This is irrelevant, but have you ever taught any college/university in
Boston? Your surname is one I have heard, before...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
20 Mar 2005 10:00:30 PM |
|
|
Somewriter wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:18:51 -0700, Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Somewriter wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:26:04 -0700, Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine, and as women who do not deserve love if they become pregnant, and
"abortion industry profit machine" ?
Look at the cost of abortion and the cost of carrying a pregnany to
term, in addition to the eighteen years of caring for the results.
Oh right! ;)
RT
This is irrelevant, but have you ever taught any college/university in
Boston? Your surname is one I have heard, before...
Boston? Lived in New York State for a few years but that's about it.
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
14 Mar 2005 05:08:16 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:14:58 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110665555.761732.51390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
in my opinion ...
those who would deny women their right to terminate a pegnancy at any
time during the pregnancy and for any reason think of women as nothing
more than breeding stock.
If you thnk of them that way, for what they are, you can love them better.
LOL!
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine...
Hmmm, I have never been approached by somebody demanding I get
pregnant and stay pregnant long to terminate it at their facility.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
15 Mar 2005 02:51:10 PM |
|
|
In article <a96c31t87f6s4iesnujpq97h9iv3jtnf4q@4ax.com>,
sappywriter@poetic.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine...
Hmmm, I have never been approached by somebody demanding I get
pregnant and stay pregnant long to terminate it at their facility.
Nor me. In fact I have never heard of anyone being solicited in that
way.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sergeant America" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 06:44:20 AM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <a96c31t87f6s4iesnujpq97h9iv3jtnf4q@4ax.com>,
sappywriter@poetic.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine...
Hmmm, I have never been approached by somebody demanding I get
pregnant and stay pregnant long to terminate it at their facility.
Nor me. In fact I have never heard of anyone being solicited in that
way.
Abortion counsellors frequently coerce women into having abortions. They
also turn a blind eye when an underaged girl may have been the victim of
statutory rape. They prefer to abort the pregnancy than takes steps to
prevent further ones. We're dealing with scumbags: scumbags like you,
Pat.
http://www.childpredators.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ron" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
15 Mar 2005 11:18:15 PM |
|
|
In article <42382A24.E17603BA@hotmail.com>,
Sergeant America <sergeant_america@hotmail.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <a96c31t87f6s4iesnujpq97h9iv3jtnf4q@4ax.com>,
sappywriter@poetic.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine...
Hmmm, I have never been approached by somebody demanding I get
pregnant and stay pregnant long to terminate it at their facility.
Nor me. In fact I have never heard of anyone being solicited in that
way.
Abortion counsellors frequently coerce women into having abortions. They
also turn a blind eye when an underaged girl may have been the victim of
statutory rape. They prefer to abort the pregnancy than takes steps to
prevent further ones. We're dealing with scumbags: scumbags like you,
Pat.
http://www.childpredators.com
I always get a good chuckle over this one. "Have the abortion, or
else..." Coersion generally involves a threat of some kind in order to
gain the compliance of the other. I would be interested in know how you
think any health care provider is coersing anyone to do anything.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sergeant America" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 04:31:29 PM |
|
|
Ron wrote:
In article <42382A24.E17603BA@hotmail.com>,
Sergeant America <sergeant_america@hotmail.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <a96c31t87f6s4iesnujpq97h9iv3jtnf4q@4ax.com>,
sappywriter@poetic.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine...
Hmmm, I have never been approached by somebody demanding I get
pregnant and stay pregnant long to terminate it at their facility.
Nor me. In fact I have never heard of anyone being solicited in that
way.
Abortion counsellors frequently coerce women into having abortions. They
also turn a blind eye when an underaged girl may have been the victim of
statutory rape. They prefer to abort the pregnancy than takes steps to
prevent further ones. We're dealing with scumbags: scumbags like you,
Pat.
http://www.childpredators.com
I always get a good chuckle over this one. "Have the abortion, or
else..." Coersion generally involves a threat of some kind in order to
gain the compliance of the other. I would be interested in know how you
think any health care provider is coersing anyone to do anything.
By talking up the benefits of abortion and emphasizing the negatives (-
the "or else" that you're talking about). Assuming it's to be entirely
the woman's informed choice then they're supposed to be neutral.
A lot of these abortion clinic counsellors are steeped in feminist
ideology which debases motherhood, so that's obviously a dangerous
combination.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 09:20:49 PM |
|
|
in article 4238B3C1.9800CA46@hotmail.com, Sergeant America at
sergeant_america@hotmail.com wrote on 3/16/05 5:31 PM:
Ron wrote:
In article <42382A24.E17603BA@hotmail.com>,
Sergeant America <sergeant_america@hotmail.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <a96c31t87f6s4iesnujpq97h9iv3jtnf4q@4ax.com>,
sappywriter@poetic.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry
profit
machine...
Hmmm, I have never been approached by somebody demanding I get
pregnant and stay pregnant long to terminate it at their facility.
Nor me. In fact I have never heard of anyone being solicited in that
way.
Abortion counsellors frequently coerce women into having abortions. They
also turn a blind eye when an underaged girl may have been the victim of
statutory rape. They prefer to abort the pregnancy than takes steps to
prevent further ones. We're dealing with scumbags: scumbags like you,
Pat.
http://www.childpredators.com
I always get a good chuckle over this one. "Have the abortion, or
else..." Coersion generally involves a threat of some kind in order to
gain the compliance of the other. I would be interested in know how you
think any health care provider is coersing anyone to do anything.
By talking up the benefits of abortion and emphasizing the negatives (-
the "or else" that you're talking about). Assuming it's to be entirely
the woman's informed choice then they're supposed to be neutral.
A lot of these abortion clinic counsellors are steeped in feminist
ideology which debases motherhood, so that's obviously a dangerous
combination.
Since it is impossible for you to experience motherhood, Sarge, it
IS easy for you to romanticize it, and only gaze upon it through
rose-colored spectacles.
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
16 Mar 2005 09:45:11 PM |
|
|
Sergeant America wrote:
Abortion counsellors frequently coerce women into having abortions.
cites, please.
if you made it up, no response is needed.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: women as breeding stock |
15 Mar 2005 06:28:53 PM |
|
|
Sergeant America wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <a96c31t87f6s4iesnujpq97h9iv3jtnf4q@4ax.com>,
sappywriter@poetic.com says...
Pro-Choicers think of women as incubators for the abortion industry profit
machine...
Hmmm, I have never been approached by somebody demanding I get
pregnant and stay pregnant long to terminate it at their facility.
Nor me. In fact I have never heard of anyone being solicited in that
way.
Abortion counsellors frequently coerce women into having abortions.
Bull.
They
also turn a blind eye when an underaged girl may have been the victim of
statutory rape. They prefer to abort the pregnancy than takes steps to
prevent further ones. We're dealing with scumbags: scumbags like you,
Pat.
http://www.childpredators.com
--
--sexkitten--
In Loving Memory of Jim Addison
9/18/71 - 12/30/04
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
