| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
09 May 2006 09:28:17 PM |
| Object: |
" Liberals are Insane " |
Liberals are Insane
By Jan Larson
The liberal way of thinking is incompatible with the realities of the world.
Liberals will never solve problems and, in fact, will cause and perpetuate
them because they cannot and do not understand how the world works. This has
been proven throughout history.
The liberal view is defined by what "should be" rather than "what is." On
the other hand, conservatives are pragmatic and accept that what is . is.
That is, conservatives know the definition of "is" and can appreciate that
while "should be" is a worthwhile goal, it can never be achieved given "what
is."
This difference is clearly seen by the way liberals and conservatives would
deal with sex offenders. The liberal position is that molesting a child is
no different than shoplifting. This position maintains that once the
sentence has been served, the perpetrator, having paid his or her debt to
society, should be given a clean slate.
The problem is that the rate of recidivism among all criminals is greater
than zero and for sex offenders it is much greater than zero [1]. That is
what is.
When it comes to shoplifting, a repeat offender doesn't physically harm
anyone so even if some do re-offend, there is no serious damage done.
However, this is not the case with sex offenders. A re-offender destroys
another life, namely that of his or her next victim. Sex offenders must
never be given a clean slate. To do so simply denies what is. Liberals would
sacrifice another child than to accept that a sex offender is different than
a shoplifter.
The war on terrorism completely confounds the liberal mind. In the liberal
(secular) view, no one will act irrationally based on a religious belief.
Liberals cannot rationalize why Islamic extremists would kill for no other
reason than because their religious beliefs compel them to do so.
Liberals hold that terrorists kill because they want something or because we
did something that makes them kill and if we only gave them something or
stopped doing whatever it is that they don't like, they would be happy and
stop killing.
What is reality is that Islamic terrorists would kill millions if they
simply had the means to do so. Negotiating or appeasing those whose position
is non-negotiable and are willing to die for their cause is no different
than negotiating with a great white shark. While you talk, they kill you.
Liberals wailed against the NSA wiretapping program, defending their
position in the name of protecting "civil liberties." It does no good to
have civil liberties if you're dead.
The goal of the program is to prevent terrorist attacks that could kill
hundreds or thousands of American citizens, which would, of course deny the
dead of all of their civil liberties. What is a fact is that would-be
terrorists make international calls.
Liberals are also wrong on border security. They say that illegal immigrants
only come to work and seek better lives. Some do, but the reality is that
illegals also come to the United States to feed at the welfare trough and to
engage in criminal activities. One day, if nothing is done, terrorists will
find their way across the southern border as well.
To think that America will continue along its merry way no matter how many
poor people, criminals and terrorists stream across the border is nothing
more than wishful thinking about what "should be," but not "what is."
Liberal thinking is timid thinking. It denies the realities of the world and
of human nature. It is shallow and shortsighted. Liberals are naïve and, if
allowed to come to power are, frankly, dangerous. History has proven liberal
views to be wrong again and again. Insanity is the belief that the same
action will produce a different outcome. Liberals are insane.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
10 May 2006 01:03:42 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Liberals are Insane
A Day in Life of Joe Republican
Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare
his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some
tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards.
With his first swallow of coffee, he takes his daily medication. His
medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought
to insure their safety and that they work as advertised.
All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer's medical
plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for
paid medical insurance -- now Joe gets it, too.
He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe's bacon is safe
to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the
meat packing industry.
In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is
properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total
contents because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know
what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.
Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he
breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought
for laws to stop industries from polluting our air.
He walks to the subway station for his government-subsidized ride to
work. It saves him considerable money in parking and transportation
fees because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public
transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a
contributor.
Joe begins his workday. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical
benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy
liberal union members fought and died for these working standards.
Joe's employer pays these standards because Joe's employer doesn't
want his employees to call the union. If Joe is hurt on the job or
becomes unemployed, he'll get a workers compensation or unemployment
check because some stupid liberal didn't think he should lose his home
because of his temporary misfortune.
It's noontime, and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some
bills. Joe's deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC, because some
godless liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous
bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression.
Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his
below-market federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided
that Joe and the government would be better off if he were educated
and earned more money over his lifetime.
Joe is home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at
his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His
car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating
liberal fought for car safety standards.
He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live
in the house financed by Farmers' Home Administration because bankers
didn't want to make rural loans. The house didn't have electricity
until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't
belong and demanded rural electrification.
He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on
Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking,
cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe
wouldn't have to.
Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk
show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and
conservatives are good. He doesn't mention that the beloved
Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe
enjoys throughout his day. Joe agrees: "We don't need those
big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I'm a self- made
man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I
have."
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
10 May 2006 02:27:45 AM |
|
|
*A Day in Life of Joe Republican
Brilliant! Thank you!
Are you the author? Do you mind if I use it again in the future in such
discussion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
10 May 2006 03:40:19 AM |
|
|
On 10 May 2006 00:27:45 -0700, "Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com>
wrote:
*A Day in Life of Joe Republican
Brilliant! Thank you!
Are you the author? Do you mind if I use it again in the future in such
discussion?
Actually, I posted that several months ago. And I'm not the author
either.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
10 May 2006 10:03:06 PM |
|
|
Parsifal <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote:
*A Day in Life of Joe Republican
Brilliant! Thank you!
Are you the author?
Alas no.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
10 May 2006 01:26:18 AM |
|
|
....Joe arrives at his home and hears a strange noise inside. He opens
the door, everything is in order, must have been a rat. He goes to his
bedroom, tired from a long day of dealing with those crazy liberals. A
noise comes from ouside the bedroom door, someone's there. Joe panics
and reaches into his nightstand drawer. There's nothing but a Bible
there! Thats roght, those liberals took away Joe's gun!!! Joe faces
his attacker, looks like the liberal's didn't take his gun away.
; )
A little kindling for ya Ray.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
10 May 2006 11:41:02 AM |
|
|
On 9 May 2006 23:26:18 -0700, wrote:
...Joe arrives at his home and hears a strange noise inside. He opens
the door, everything is in order, must have been a rat. He goes to his
bedroom, tired from a long day of dealing with those crazy liberals. A
noise comes from ouside the bedroom door, someone's there. Joe panics
and reaches into his nightstand drawer. There's nothing but a Bible
there! Thats roght, those liberals took away Joe's gun!!! Joe faces
his attacker, looks like the liberal's didn't take his gun away.
; )
A little kindling for ya Ray.
Except - the liberals didn't take away his gun.
Ooops.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
10 May 2006 12:07:28 PM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
On 9 May 2006 23:26:18 -0700, wrote:
...Joe arrives at his home and hears a strange noise inside. He opens
the door, everything is in order, must have been a rat. He goes to his
bedroom, tired from a long day of dealing with those crazy liberals. A
noise comes from ouside the bedroom door, someone's there. Joe panics
and reaches into his nightstand drawer. There's nothing but a Bible
there! Thats roght, those liberals took away Joe's gun!!! Joe faces
his attacker, looks like the liberal's didn't take his gun away.
; )
A little kindling for ya Ray.
Except - the liberals didn't take away his gun.
How many liberals support law abiding citizens to own a gun?
How many liberals support Carry Concealed Weapon cards, for not only
those who work law enforcement but for any law abidiing citizen?
Ooops.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
10 May 2006 02:10:02 PM |
|
|
On 10 May 2006 10:07:28 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
On 9 May 2006 23:26:18 -0700, wrote:
...Joe arrives at his home and hears a strange noise inside. He opens
the door, everything is in order, must have been a rat. He goes to his
bedroom, tired from a long day of dealing with those crazy liberals. A
noise comes from ouside the bedroom door, someone's there. Joe panics
and reaches into his nightstand drawer. There's nothing but a Bible
there! Thats roght, those liberals took away Joe's gun!!! Joe faces
his attacker, looks like the liberal's didn't take his gun away.
; )
A little kindling for ya Ray.
Except - the liberals didn't take away his gun.
How many liberals support law abiding citizens to own a gun?
I don't personally know any that don't and usually I hear a lot of
liberals saying that do support it.
Other than that, I don't know of any poll taken about it for liberals
only.
Do you?
Or do you blindly just accept conservative propaganda that pretends
they do?
How many liberals support Carry Concealed Weapon cards, for not only
those who work law enforcement but for any law abidiing citizen?
Same thing. I've never even heard of that one being any kind of
issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
11 May 2006 12:13:48 AM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
On 10 May 2006 10:07:28 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
On 9 May 2006 23:26:18 -0700, wrote:
...Joe arrives at his home and hears a strange noise inside. He opens
the door, everything is in order, must have been a rat. He goes to his
bedroom, tired from a long day of dealing with those crazy liberals. A
noise comes from ouside the bedroom door, someone's there. Joe panics
and reaches into his nightstand drawer. There's nothing but a Bible
there! Thats roght, those liberals took away Joe's gun!!! Joe faces
his attacker, looks like the liberal's didn't take his gun away.
; )
A little kindling for ya Ray.
Except - the liberals didn't take away his gun.
How many liberals support law abiding citizens to own a gun?
I don't personally know any that don't and usually I hear a lot of
liberals saying that do support it.
That would be a first. Personally, almost every liberal I have ever
met and/or talked to believe that all guns should be taken away from
the public. But you spoke as if you knew something of the issue.
Which is why I asked you.
Other than that, I don't know of any poll taken about it for liberals
only.
Do you?
Nope, I only know what I know from personal experience. I asked you
because you spoke as if you knew.
Or do you blindly just accept conservative propaganda that pretends
they do?
Ahhh, the stereotyping begins.
Clue sister: I am moderate. So you can stop the stereotyping now.
How many liberals support Carry Concealed Weapon cards, for not only
those who work law enforcement but for any law abidiing citizen?
Same thing. I've never even heard of that one being any kind of
issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
11 May 2006 12:31:08 AM |
|
|
On 10 May 2006 22:13:48 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
On 10 May 2006 10:07:28 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
On 9 May 2006 23:26:18 -0700, wrote:
...Joe arrives at his home and hears a strange noise inside. He opens
the door, everything is in order, must have been a rat. He goes to his
bedroom, tired from a long day of dealing with those crazy liberals. A
noise comes from ouside the bedroom door, someone's there. Joe panics
and reaches into his nightstand drawer. There's nothing but a Bible
there! Thats roght, those liberals took away Joe's gun!!! Joe faces
his attacker, looks like the liberal's didn't take his gun away.
; )
A little kindling for ya Ray.
Except - the liberals didn't take away his gun.
How many liberals support law abiding citizens to own a gun?
I don't personally know any that don't and usually I hear a lot of
liberals saying that do support it.
That would be a first. Personally, almost every liberal I have ever
met and/or talked to believe that all guns should be taken away from
the public. But you spoke as if you knew something of the issue.
Which is why I asked you.
I have yet to hear one say anything like that.
Other than that, I don't know of any poll taken about it for liberals
only.
Do you?
Nope, I only know what I know from personal experience. I asked you
because you spoke as if you knew.
Or do you blindly just accept conservative propaganda that pretends
they do?
Ahhh, the stereotyping begins.
Clue sister: I am moderate. So you can stop the stereotyping now.
Not from what I've read of your posts.
How many liberals support Carry Concealed Weapon cards, for not only
those who work law enforcement but for any law abidiing citizen?
Same thing. I've never even heard of that one being any kind of
issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
11 May 2006 12:36:18 AM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
On 10 May 2006 22:13:48 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
On 10 May 2006 10:07:28 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
On 9 May 2006 23:26:18 -0700, wrote:
...Joe arrives at his home and hears a strange noise inside. He opens
the door, everything is in order, must have been a rat. He goes to his
bedroom, tired from a long day of dealing with those crazy liberals. A
noise comes from ouside the bedroom door, someone's there. Joe panics
and reaches into his nightstand drawer. There's nothing but a Bible
there! Thats roght, those liberals took away Joe's gun!!! Joe faces
his attacker, looks like the liberal's didn't take his gun away.
; )
A little kindling for ya Ray.
Except - the liberals didn't take away his gun.
How many liberals support law abiding citizens to own a gun?
I don't personally know any that don't and usually I hear a lot of
liberals saying that do support it.
That would be a first. Personally, almost every liberal I have ever
met and/or talked to believe that all guns should be taken away from
the public. But you spoke as if you knew something of the issue.
Which is why I asked you.
I have yet to hear one say anything like that.
Other than that, I don't know of any poll taken about it for liberals
only.
Do you?
Nope, I only know what I know from personal experience. I asked you
because you spoke as if you knew.
Or do you blindly just accept conservative propaganda that pretends
they do?
Ahhh, the stereotyping begins.
Clue sister: I am moderate. So you can stop the stereotyping now.
Not from what I've read of your posts.
You will read what you want to read obviously.
Some people are like that. They read things, and they look for what
they want to look for. Some people are different and go deeper and
actually research and ask questions.
You choose to not dig deeper, which demonstrates you are shallow in
your thinking. I am moderate. Some issues I tend to agree with
liberals. Some issues I agree with Democrats. Some issues I agree with
Republicans. One thing I do agree on is that a liberal (FAR LEFT) and
a neo-con (FAR RIGHT), are dangerous and bad for this country. Where
do you stand? How FAR LEFT do you go?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Osprey the Moderate Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
16 May 2006 03:40:48 PM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
Ahhh, the stereotyping begins.
Clue sister: I am moderate. So you can stop the stereotyping now.
Not from what I've read of your posts.
What you have to understand is that we have a Lake Wobegon "all
children are above average" problem here. Osprey lives in his own
little world where his stereotyping is truth and other people's truths
are stereotyping. He believes every conservative talking point on
liberals and doesn't personally know any liberal, nor has he talked to
any. Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate. It's not
like he goes out and actually researches to verify that. He KNOWS
that he is a moderate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Moderate Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
16 May 2006 05:27:49 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Kate wrote:
Ahhh, the stereotyping begins.
Clue sister: I am moderate. So you can stop the stereotyping now.
Not from what I've read of your posts.
What you have to understand is that we have a Lake Wobegon "all
children are above average" problem here. Osprey lives in his own
little world where his stereotyping is truth and other people's truths
are stereotyping.
That's a lie
He believes every conservative talking point on
liberals
That's another lie
and doesn't personally know any liberal,
That's another lie
nor has he talked to
any.
Sigh..another lie
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
It's not
like he goes out
I go out all the time, getting ready to take the family in July one a
wonderful week vacation to deep creek lake. Next year, Crater Lake
Oregon.
and actually researches to verify that.
I do a lot of research....so yet another lie
He KNOWS
that he is a moderate.
That's the only part of your post that was truthful.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Moderate Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
16 May 2006 05:38:14 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
and actually researches to verify that.
I do a lot of research....so yet another lie
Really? Then you should be able to provide us with a list of your
publications. Or maybe "research" doesn't mean to you what it means to
some of us. :-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
16 May 2006 11:10:01 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
16 May 2006 11:24:44 PM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 04:10:01 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
.....is a good candidate for a nazi or fascist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
16 May 2006 11:59:08 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 May 2006 22:24:44 -0600, wrote:
On 17 May 2006 04:10:01 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
....is a good candidate for a nazi or fascist.
.... Except he's too fat to fit into a Panzer.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2449 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Ahhhhhh, yessssssss, ummmmmmm - Alito, Alito, Alito"
-duke (duckgumbo@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 59
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge,who pussied
out of the Vietnam draft, showing his gay side
despite his avowed anti-gay bigotry
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
stpatrickbr<AT>bellsouth<DOT>net
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 08:52:32 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 09:18:27 AM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 09:35:52 AM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 09:44:03 AM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult. You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for, so you oppose reform and openness to new
ideas. It's simple, really, as are you.
It's quite easy to see where someone stands by what they use as an
insult. Your 'insult' shows that you think that liberalism is a bad
thing.
But then again, we already knew that. It's been quite obvious from
your first posts.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 09:47:37 AM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult.
Because I see liberals like you as losers.
You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for,
You don't and I have yet to see any liberals in here stand for what the
definition of what liberalism is.
Then again, you lie so who could believe you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 10:04:06 AM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 07:47:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult.
Because I see liberals like you as losers.
You're just confirming what I say about you, bobby.
You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for,
You don't
You're right there - I don't oppose what liberalism stands for.
and I have yet to see any liberals in here stand for what the
definition of what liberalism is.
Since you don't even know what 'liberal' means, your statement is
nonsensical.
Then again, you lie so who could believe you.
Like I said - you oppose what liberalism stands for. We all know this,
so it's time you stopped trying to lie about it.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 10:05:58 AM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:47:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult.
Because I see liberals like you as losers.
You're just confirming what I say about you, bobby.
Blow it out your ***** loser..:o)
You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for,
You don't
You're right there - I don't oppose what liberalism stands for.
And you are lying about what I said. You are not for liberalism, you
are for what YOU want and ONLY what you want. You don't embrace anyone
elses ideas unless they are in line with yours. That's been proven.
and I have yet to see any liberals in here stand for what the
definition of what liberalism is.
Since you don't even know what 'liberal' means, your statement is
nonsensical.
I know this, from the definition given for liberal, you don't fit that
description.
Then again, you lie so who could believe you.
Like I said - you oppose what liberalism stands for.
Like I said - you lie.
We all know this,
That's typical of you to think you can speak for others.
Go ahead and prove that I oppose what liberalism stands for, you get
your shot now.
Here's an example: I support stem cell research.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 10:30:43 AM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 08:05:58 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:47:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult.
Because I see liberals like you as losers.
You're just confirming what I say about you, bobby.
Blow it out your ***** loser..:o)
Yup, you confirm it more and more.
You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for,
You don't
You're right there - I don't oppose what liberalism stands for.
And you are lying about what I said. You are not for liberalism, you
are for what YOU want and ONLY what you want. You don't embrace anyone
elses ideas unless they are in line with yours. That's been proven.
Wrong, for more than one reason. Liberalism is being open to new idea,
not necessarily embracing them. Let's see if you can spot the other
reason.
and I have yet to see any liberals in here stand for what the
definition of what liberalism is.
Since you don't even know what 'liberal' means, your statement is
nonsensical.
I know this, from the definition given for liberal, you don't fit that
description.
Ah, weaseling away from the point. You don't know what the word means,
so why should I care when you try to apply your illiterate
interpretation of it to me?
Then again, you lie so who could believe you.
Like I said - you oppose what liberalism stands for.
Like I said - you lie.
We all know this,
That's typical of you to think you can speak for others.
Go ahead and prove that I oppose what liberalism stands for, you get
your shot now.
Here's an example: I support stem cell research.
You oppose gay marriage, for just one thing. You, in fact, oppose most
equal rights for homosexuals.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 12:28:37 PM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 08:05:58 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:47:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult.
Because I see liberals like you as losers.
You're just confirming what I say about you, bobby.
Blow it out your ***** loser..:o)
Yup, you confirm it more and more.
You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for,
You don't
You're right there - I don't oppose what liberalism stands for.
And you are lying about what I said.
Nope, I am dead on.
You are not for liberalism
I am very much for the ideals for the definition you provided for
liberalism.
, you
are for what YOU want and ONLY what you want.
Why do you lie?
You don't embrace anyone
elses ideas unless they are in line with yours.
Why do you lie?
That's been proven.
Show your proof
Wrong, for more than one reason. Liberalism is being open to new idea,
Which I am for
not necessarily embracing them. Let's see if you can spot the other
reason.
and I have yet to see any liberals in here stand for what the
definition of what liberalism is.
Since you don't even know what 'liberal' means, your statement is
nonsensical.
I know this, from the definition given for liberal, you don't fit that
description.
Ah, weaseling away from the point.
Nope, just stating the facts
You don't know what the word means,
so why should I care when you try to apply your illiterate
interpretation of it to me?
Then again, you lie so who could believe you.
Like I said - you oppose what liberalism stands for.
Like I said - you lie.
We all know this,
That's typical of you to think you can speak for others.
Go ahead and prove that I oppose what liberalism stands for, you get
your shot now.
Here's an example: I support stem cell research.
You oppose gay marriage,
Yea, and? So I have to approve of gay marriage in order to support
your idea of what liberalism is?
Do you support allowing students to openly pray in school?
for just one thing. You, in fact, oppose most
equal rights for homosexuals.
Not at all, you lied again. I am for all citizens having equal rights
afforded to them by our constitution.
Well, looks like you failed again loser.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 12:51:03 PM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 10:28:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 08:05:58 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:47:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult.
Because I see liberals like you as losers.
You're just confirming what I say about you, bobby.
Blow it out your ***** loser..:o)
Yup, you confirm it more and more.
You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for,
You don't
You're right there - I don't oppose what liberalism stands for.
And you are lying about what I said.
Nope, I am dead on.
You are not for liberalism
I am very much for the ideals for the definition you provided for
liberalism.
No, you aren't.
, you
are for what YOU want and ONLY what you want.
Why do you lie?
You don't embrace anyone
elses ideas unless they are in line with yours.
Why do you lie?
That's been proven.
Show your proof
Your prejudice towards homosexuals.
Wrong, for more than one reason. Liberalism is being open to new idea,
Which I am for
Wrong.
not necessarily embracing them. Let's see if you can spot the other
reason.
Didn't think you could.
and I have yet to see any liberals in here stand for what the
definition of what liberalism is.
Since you don't even know what 'liberal' means, your statement is
nonsensical.
I know this, from the definition given for liberal, you don't fit that
description.
Ah, weaseling away from the point.
Nope, just stating the facts
You don't know what the word means,
so why should I care when you try to apply your illiterate
interpretation of it to me?
Well?
Then again, you lie so who could believe you.
Like I said - you oppose what liberalism stands for.
Like I said - you lie.
We all know this,
That's typical of you to think you can speak for others.
Go ahead and prove that I oppose what liberalism stands for, you get
your shot now.
Here's an example: I support stem cell research.
You oppose gay marriage,
Yea, and? So I have to approve of gay marriage in order to support
your idea of what liberalism is?
Equal rights, moron.
Do you support allowing students to openly pray in school?
Right up until they impact another student's time. No disrupting
class, no requirement to pray or take time out of students' days for
someone else to pray.
for just one thing. You, in fact, oppose most
equal rights for homosexuals.
Not at all, you lied again. I am for all citizens having equal rights
afforded to them by our constitution.
No, you aren't.
Well, looks like you failed again loser.
Incorrect. Your lack of respect for liberalism is quite apparent.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 01:27:59 PM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 10:28:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 08:05:58 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:47:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult.
Because I see liberals like you as losers.
You're just confirming what I say about you, bobby.
Blow it out your ***** loser..:o)
Yup, you confirm it more and more.
You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for,
You don't
You're right there - I don't oppose what liberalism stands for.
And you are lying about what I said.
Nope, I am dead on.
You are not for liberalism
I am very much for the ideals for the definition you provided for
liberalism.
No, you aren't.
You lie again.
, you
are for what YOU want and ONLY what you want.
Why do you lie?
You don't embrace anyone
elses ideas unless they are in line with yours.
Why do you lie?
That's been proven.
Show your proof
Your prejudice towards homosexuals.
No, I just don't believe in giving people rights based on sexual
preference. I have no hatred towards homosexuals. And if you want to
talk about "prejudice", learn what the term means loser. You have a
lot of prejudices.
Wrong, for more than one reason. Liberalism is being open to new idea,
Which I am for
Wrong.
You lie again.
not necessarily embracing them. Let's see if you can spot the other
reason.
Didn't think you could.
You lied again
and I have yet to see any liberals in here stand for what the
definition of what liberalism is.
Since you don't even know what 'liberal' means, your statement is
nonsensical.
I know this, from the definition given for liberal, you don't fit that
description.
Ah, weaseling away from the point.
Nope, just stating the facts
You don't know what the word means,
so why should I care when you try to apply your illiterate
interpretation of it to me?
Well?
Well what? You are lying a lot.
Nothing new.
Then again, you lie so who could believe you.
Like I said - you oppose what liberalism stands for.
Like I said - you lie.
We all know this,
That's typical of you to think you can speak for others.
Go ahead and prove that I oppose what liberalism stands for, you get
your shot now.
Here's an example: I support stem cell research.
You oppose gay marriage,
Yea, and? So I have to approve of gay marriage in order to support
your idea of what liberalism is?
Equal rights, moron.
Which is why I supported and embraced the new ideas that came about to
COMPRAMISE such as allowing civil union contracts, so homosexuals could
have the same benefits as any other married couple. Here is a towel,
wipe that egg off of your face.
Do you support allowing students to openly pray in school?
Right up until they impact another student's time. No disrupting
class, no requirement to pray or take time out of students' days for
someone else to pray.
I embrace the ideals of allowing schools to teach religious topics.
for just one thing. You, in fact, oppose most
equal rights for homosexuals.
Not at all, you lied again. I am for all citizens having equal rights
afforded to them by our constitution.
No, you aren't.
You lied again.
Well, looks like you failed again loser.
Incorrect.
Nope, I am correct. You just prefer lying rather than admitting you
were wrong or actually listening. You don't embrace my ideas,
therefore you don't embrace liberalism.
Your lack of respect for liberalism is quite apparent.
You have shown it by not respecting my ideas or embracing anything new
from an opposing position. Thanks for playing loser, your lack of
respect for liralism is quite apparent.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 01:44:26 PM |
|
|
On 17 May 2006 11:27:59 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 10:28:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 08:05:58 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:47:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 07:35:52 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 06:52:32 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:
Of course he's going to be believe he's a moderate.
Because I am
A "moderate" who hates liberals and loves "conservatives".
Wrong again loser.
I don't hate anyone. I don't "respect" liberals because I have found
none that are worthy of respect. I respect Democrats and Republicans
but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with them all. I view the
liberal just as I would the extreme right winger. Both are dangerous
and can contribute nothing but bad for this country.
Both are intollerant, both have a lot of hate, both are not willing to
listen. Hmmm...like you.
It's typical of you to consider that reform and openness to new ideas
and progress is dangerous.
It's typical of you, a loser, to lie. I happen to embrace openness to
new ideas, which is why I am a student of Total Quality Management. I
just have never found a liberal to embrace openness to new ides,
reform, and progress. Liberals want it one way...their way only.
But then again, you are a loser so why waste time trying to explain it
to you.
You use 'liberal' as an insult.
Because I see liberals like you as losers.
You're just confirming what I say about you, bobby.
Blow it out your ***** loser..:o)
Yup, you confirm it more and more.
You would only do that if you oppose
what liberalism stands for,
You don't
You're right there - I don't oppose what liberalism stands for.
And you are lying about what I said.
Nope, I am dead on.
You are not for liberalism
I am very much for the ideals for the definition you provided for
liberalism.
No, you aren't.
You lie again.
Nope, it's plainly obvous.
, you
are for what YOU want and ONLY what you want.
Why do you lie?
You don't embrace anyone
elses ideas unless they are in line with yours.
Why do you lie?
That's been proven.
Show your proof
Your prejudice towards homosexuals.
No, I just don't believe in giving people rights based on sexual
preference. I have no hatred towards homosexuals. And if you want to
talk about "prejudice", learn what the term means loser. You have a
lot of prejudices.
And yet you want to give special rights based on religion (a choice)
but discriminate against those based on sexuality (so far, not shown
to be a choice).
Yep, there's your prejudice, plain as day.
Wrong, for more than one reason. Liberalism is being open to new idea,
Which I am for
Wrong.
You lie again.
No, I'm not. I'm simply observing your stated tendencies.
not necessarily embracing them. Let's see if you can spot the other
reason.
Didn't think you could.
You lied again
You didn't spot the other reason.
and I have yet to see any liberals in here stand for what the
definition of what liberalism is.
Since you don't even know what 'liberal' means, your statement is
nonsensical.
I know this, from the definition given for liberal, you don't fit that
description.
Ah, weaseling away from the point.
Nope, just stating the facts
You don't know what the word means,
so why should I care when you try to apply your illiterate
interpretation of it to me?
Well?
Well what? You are lying a lot.
Nothing new.
No answer from bobby there.
Then again, you lie so who could believe you.
Like I said - you oppose what liberalism stands for.
Like I said - you lie.
We all know this,
That's typical of you to think you can speak for others.
Go ahead and prove that I oppose what liberalism stands for, you get
your shot now.
Here's an example: I support stem cell research.
You oppose gay marriage,
Yea, and? So I have to approve of gay marriage in order to support
your idea of what liberalism is?
Equal rights, moron.
Which is why I supported and embraced the new ideas that came about to
COMPRAMISE such as allowing civil union contracts, so homosexuals could
have the same benefits as any other married couple. Here is a towel,
wipe that egg off of your face.
Ah, so you don't support equal rights, just as I said. Look up the
constitutionality of 'separate but equal' and get back to us.
Do you support allowing students to openly pray in school?
Right up until they impact another student's time. No disrupting
class, no requirement to pray or take time out of students' days for
someone else to pray.
I embrace the ideals of allowing schools to teach religious topics.
That's nice. When schools are required to teach religion then it's
time that churches be required to teach science.
for just one thing. You, in fact, oppose most
equal rights for homosexuals.
Not at all, you lied again. I am for all citizens having equal rights
afforded to them by our constitution.
No, you aren't.
You lied again.
Nope. You oppose equal protection.
Well, looks like you failed again loser.
Incorrect.
Nope, I am correct. You just prefer lying rather than admitting you
were wrong or actually listening. You don't embrace my ideas,
therefore you don't embrace liberalism.
Liberalism isn't about embracing ideas or automatically agreeing with
them, moron. Nothing says I have to agree with your ideas to remain
liberal.
Your lack of respect for liberalism is quite apparent.
You have shown it by not respecting my ideas
Your ideas don't allow for progress - you can spout your ***** all you
like, but I don't have to agree with it.
or embracing anything new
from an opposing position. Thanks for playing loser, your lack of
respect for liralism is quite apparent.
See above. I see that you haven't yet managed to understand what
liberalism means, or indeed how to spell it.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Osprey the Fascist Re: " Liberals are Insane " |
17 May 2006 01:58:29 PM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 11:27:59 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 10:28:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H wrote:
On 17 May 2006 08:05:58 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
< | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
