| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fredric L. Rice" |
| Date: |
13 Dec 2004 08:52:33 PM |
| Object: |
***** of God ***** |
From:
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:13:56 EDT
Subject: (no subject)
To:
Mr. Price, I was just reading some of your comments on Jimmy Swaggart. I am
not AOG, but I know enough of the word of God to know what he preaches IS
truth. No, I do not agree on what he has done, but there is NOT ONE of us
without sin. We all will give an account for what we have done in our
lifetime. We all deserved to go to the cross instead of Jesus, but he was
merciful to us and took our place. And He forgave the ones who crucified
Him. So, it is our choice to follow Him in this or sit back and crucify
Jimmy Swaggert over and over. But remember, whatever you forgive, the same
shall be forgiven. Instead of crucifying him, pray instead for his
weakness, if you care at all for the souls of man. Please pray before you
print anymore of this material. Let God lead you in you're
communications,PLEASE! Also, you should find out all the GOOD things he
has done in Jesus name. Let God speak to you're heart. Truly listen.
Thank you for you're time.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
15 Dec 2004 10:31:59 PM |
|
|
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10rsl82lrkupg78@corp.supernews.com...
From:
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:13:56 EDT
Subject: (no subject)
To:
Mr. Price, I was just reading some of your comments on Jimmy Swaggart. I
am
not AOG, but I know enough of the word of God to know what he preaches IS
truth. No, I do not agree on what he has done, but there is NOT ONE of us
without sin. We all will give an account for what we have done in our
lifetime. We all deserved to go to the cross instead of Jesus, but he was
merciful to us and took our place. And He forgave the ones who crucified
Him. So, it is our choice to follow Him in this or sit back and crucify
Jimmy Swaggert over and over. But remember, whatever you forgive, the same
shall be forgiven. Instead of crucifying him, pray instead for his
weakness, if you care at all for the souls of man. Please pray before you
print anymore of this material. Let God lead you in you're
communications,PLEASE! Also, you should find out all the GOOD things he
has done in Jesus name. Let God speak to you're heart. Truly listen.
Thank you for you're time.
Swaggart was a teacher of the Word for many years before it was revealed of
his horrific sins. Teachers, pastors and leaders, who influence many people,
are expected to live a moral, righteous, uncorrupt, sinless and blameless
life, otherwise they do NOT have the authority, power, truths or
righteousness to teach others. Swaggart has been a liar, deceiver, money
lover and false from day one and has NOT changed. His LOVE for money and
profiting off the gospel is appalling and the ONLY reason he pretended to
repent is because he was caught red handed and saw the loss of revenue. He
does NOT teach the truth and never has, and the fact that you think he does,
is evidence that YOU don't KNOW the truths of God, nor have OBEYED the Word
of God, as well. And if you think that it is OK to continue in sin and make
excuses that none of you are without sin, which makes it acceptable to stay
in sin, and still expect to be saved, you are only deluding yourself.
The cross was given so that mankind would have opportunity to be forgiven of
sin, IF they REPENTED and then gave in clear detail the commands, demands
and requirements of God for redemption. If you are still in sin, then you
will be condemned. And fyi, Christ did NOT forgive those who crucified Him,
but REQUESTED that they be forgiven from the Father. That request was
denied. If you think there is allot of time to be complacent and careless
in your faith, and NOT repent and stop sinning, not be pure, holy and
righteous, and then rebuke, chastise and admonish the sinners, and point out
the errors, lies, deceptions of Christian leaders, who are leading people to
hellfire and condemnation, then you are sadly mistaken.
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10rsl82lrkupg78@corp.supernews.com...
From:
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:13:56 EDT
Subject: (no subject)
To:
Mr. Price, I was just reading some of your comments on Jimmy Swaggart. I
am
not AOG, but I know enough of the word of God to know what he preaches IS
truth. No, I do not agree on what he has done, but there is NOT ONE of us
without sin. We all will give an account for what we have done in our
lifetime. We all deserved to go to the cross instead of Jesus, but he was
merciful to us and took our place. And He forgave the ones who crucified
Him. So, it is our choice to follow Him in this or sit back and crucify
Jimmy Swaggert over and over. But remember, whatever you forgive, the same
shall be forgiven. Instead of crucifying him, pray instead for his
weakness, if you care at all for the souls of man. Please pray before you
print anymore of this material. Let God lead you in you're
communications,PLEASE! Also, you should find out all the GOOD things he
has done in Jesus name. Let God speak to you're heart. Truly listen.
Thank you for you're time.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
16 Dec 2004 10:05:21 AM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10rsl82lrkupg78@corp.supernews.com...
From:
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:13:56 EDT
Subject: (no subject)
To:
Mr. Price, I was just reading some of your comments on Jimmy Swaggart. I
am
not AOG, but I know enough of the word of God to know what he preaches IS
truth. No, I do not agree on what he has done, but there is NOT ONE of us
without sin. We all will give an account for what we have done in our
lifetime. We all deserved to go to the cross instead of Jesus, but he was
merciful to us and took our place. And He forgave the ones who crucified
Him. So, it is our choice to follow Him in this or sit back and crucify
Jimmy Swaggert over and over. But remember, whatever you forgive, the same
shall be forgiven. Instead of crucifying him, pray instead for his
weakness, if you care at all for the souls of man. Please pray before you
print anymore of this material. Let God lead you in you're
communications,PLEASE! Also, you should find out all the GOOD things he
has done in Jesus name. Let God speak to you're heart. Truly listen.
Thank you for you're time.
Swaggart was a teacher of the Word for many years before it was revealed of
his horrific sins.
Swaggart didn't "sin" -- not according to normal people.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
17 Dec 2004 08:31:53 PM |
|
|
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s3cejl3f85770@corp.supernews.com...
Swaggart didn't "sin" -- not according to normal people.
"Normal" people don't determine what is sin, God does.
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s3cejl3f85770@corp.supernews.com...
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10rsl82lrkupg78@corp.supernews.com...
From:
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:13:56 EDT
Subject: (no subject)
To:
Mr. Price, I was just reading some of your comments on Jimmy Swaggart. I
am
not AOG, but I know enough of the word of God to know what he preaches
IS
truth. No, I do not agree on what he has done, but there is NOT ONE of
us
without sin. We all will give an account for what we have done in our
lifetime. We all deserved to go to the cross instead of Jesus, but he
was
merciful to us and took our place. And He forgave the ones who crucified
Him. So, it is our choice to follow Him in this or sit back and crucify
Jimmy Swaggert over and over. But remember, whatever you forgive, the
same
shall be forgiven. Instead of crucifying him, pray instead for his
weakness, if you care at all for the souls of man. Please pray before
you
print anymore of this material. Let God lead you in you're
communications,PLEASE! Also, you should find out all the GOOD things he
has done in Jesus name. Let God speak to you're heart. Truly listen.
Thank you for you're time.
Swaggart was a teacher of the Word for many years before it was revealed
of
his horrific sins.
Swaggart didn't "sin" -- not according to normal people.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
17 Dec 2004 09:28:40 PM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s3cejl3f85770@corp.supernews.com...
Swaggart didn't "sin" -- not according to normal people.
"Normal" people don't determine what is sin, God does.
Think it through, cultist. People created the gods ergo...
complete the sentence.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
19 Dec 2004 04:58:09 PM |
|
|
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78rqmqhhhpa0@corp.supernews.com...
Think it through, cultist. People created the gods ergo...
People cannot create a flea, much less the ONE and ONLY God. Sure people
create their own false gods, but what does that have to do with the REAL
One, who created the Universe, all realms, times, places and things?
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78rqmqhhhpa0@corp.supernews.com...
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s3cejl3f85770@corp.supernews.com...
Swaggart didn't "sin" -- not according to normal people.
"Normal" people don't determine what is sin, God does.
Think it through, cultist. People created the gods ergo...
complete the sentence.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
20 Dec 2004 09:29:39 PM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78rqmqhhhpa0@corp.supernews.com...
Think it through, cultist. People created the gods ergo...
People cannot create a flea, much less the ONE and ONLY God.
People create gods, goddesses, pixies, fairies, vampires, and other
fictional constructs by the score every day. Denial is ratyher stupid
since you yourself think you have some.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
19 Dec 2004 07:39:39 PM |
|
|
Dore wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78rqmqhhhpa0@corp.supernews.com...
Think it through, cultist. People created the gods ergo...
People cannot create a flea, much less the ONE and ONLY God. Sure people
create their own false gods, but what does that have to do with the REAL
One, who created the Universe, all realms, times, places and things?
You can't make a flee, but you clowns make
god by the millions. Not real ones though.
--
I am surrounded by fools and chimpanzees!
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hector Plasmic" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
16 Dec 2004 12:03:38 PM |
|
|
Swaggart was a teacher of the Word for many years before
it was revealed of his horrific sins.
....
Swaggart has been a liar, deceiver, money lover and
false from day one and has NOT changed.
Thanks for supporting Hector's Law. Bet you didn't notice.
Hec
http://hectorplasmic.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
15 Dec 2004 11:47:10 PM |
|
|
On 15 Dec 2004, Dore dropped trou, farted, whirled, then shouted:
Swaggart was a teacher of the Word for many years before it was
revealed of his horrific sins. Teachers, pastors and leaders, who
influence many people, are expected to live a moral, righteous,
uncorrupt, sinless and blameless life, otherwise they do NOT have the
authority, power, truths or righteousness to teach others. Swaggart
has been a liar, deceiver, money lover and false from day one and has
NOT changed. His LOVE for money and profiting off the gospel is
appalling and the ONLY reason he pretended to repent is because he was
caught red handed and saw the loss of revenue. He does NOT teach the
truth and never has, and the fact that you think he does, is evidence
that YOU don't KNOW the truths of God, nor have OBEYED the Word of
God, as well. And if you think that it is OK to continue in sin and
make excuses that none of you are without sin, which makes it
acceptable to stay in sin, and still expect to be saved, you are only
deluding yourself.
Hello Dore, welcome to the real world. Religion serves three purposes.
It fixes the death thing for the weak-minded. Political leaders find it
very useful for controlling populations. And it makes mega bucks without
having to learn a highly advanced technical skill. Who's the sucker
here?
The cross was given so that mankind would have opportunity to be
forgiven of sin, IF they REPENTED and then gave in clear detail the
commands, demands and requirements of God for redemption. If you are
still in sin, then you will be condemned. And fyi, Christ did NOT
forgive those who crucified Him, but REQUESTED that they be forgiven
from the Father. That request was denied. If you think there is allot
of time to be complacent and careless in your faith, and NOT repent
and stop sinning, not be pure, holy and righteous, and then rebuke,
chastise and admonish the sinners, and point out the errors, lies,
deceptions of Christian leaders, who are leading people to hellfire
and condemnation, then you are sadly mistaken.
Looks like it's you. Sucker.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
--------
Hebrews 11:1
Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not
seen.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
16 Dec 2004 12:05:03 AM |
|
|
TV's Dore wrote:
Swaggart was a teacher of the Word for many years
Then, TV's Dore wrote:
He does NOT teach the truth and never has,
Are you admitting "the Word" is not true?
--
"Books are from the devil, and TV is twice as fast" - Meatwad
aa #2133
ap #19
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
17 Dec 2004 08:30:48 PM |
|
|
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:32cmsaF3j3nofU1@individual.net...
Are you admitting "the Word" is not true?
No, Swaggart doesn't teach "the Word". He teaches his false interpretations
of it.
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:32cmsaF3j3nofU1@individual.net...
TV's Dore wrote:
Swaggart was a teacher of the Word for many years
Then, TV's Dore wrote:
He does NOT teach the truth and never has,
Are you admitting "the Word" is not true?
--
"Books are from the devil, and TV is twice as fast" - Meatwad
aa #2133
ap #19
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
17 Dec 2004 09:28:02 PM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:32cmsaF3j3nofU1@individual.net...
Are you admitting "the Word" is not true?
No, Swaggart doesn't teach "the Word". He teaches his false interpretations of it.
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false
Christian.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
19 Dec 2004 04:56:43 PM |
|
|
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false
Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for many years.
It has NOTHING to do with the TRUTHS of TRUE Christianity, for which I am
the author.
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:32cmsaF3j3nofU1@individual.net...
Are you admitting "the Word" is not true?
No, Swaggart doesn't teach "the Word". He teaches his false
interpretations of it.
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false
Christian.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
20 Dec 2004 09:28:50 PM |
|
|
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for many years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
22 Dec 2004 01:48:56 PM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false
Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for many
years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
All the best,
Roger Pearse
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
24 Dec 2004 05:12:12 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for many years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the origins
and revisions of his paper idol.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
"Rightards... the other other white meat."
"And by the way - about the name you keep calling us --
"rightards". Very nice of your liberal sorry fucked
up ***** to come up with a name that debases mentally
disabled persons." -- Charlie Wolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Newto Joseph" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
26 Dec 2004 11:33:09 PM |
|
|
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the origins
and revisions of his paper idol.
ABOUT THE BIBLE
By New 10
XXXX
I am not a bible scholar nor have I read the bible, but I have books by
Scholar's who HAVE read the Bible. It would seem to me
that words spoken two thousand years ago would have a different meaning
today. From its translation from Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, English
during the course of history these past two thousand years there is some
words that get lost in translation. One other factor that we must take into
consideration and that is the Nicene counsel in the forth century that took
votes of what portion of the bible will be kept or discarded. Another aspect
we must take into consideration, there were further changes in the bible by
Monks sitting in their Monastery scriptorium rewriting worn out bibles to
fit their religious and political views of their time. This is also true
about the King James Version that used the king James English that changed
the meanings of words. Just like each religious denomination does today to
slant the meaning towards their denomination and interpretation of the
Bible. Since the nineteen fifties religious denominations have changed the
meaning of the bible yet again to extricate the vulgar language from the
Bible. Did you know there was a time in the later part of the nineteenth
century there were parts of the bible thought to be too pornographic and was
censored by the moral police of the time? The truth be known, no one really
knows what the bible means. I see the Bible as a work of myth, fable and
folklore, not any different then the stories found in the Grimm's brothers
fairytales.
If you are not an etymologist, you don't know what the Bibles
means
or says, so who are you kidding?
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
27 Dec 2004 05:25:15 PM |
|
|
Dr. Newto Joseph wrote:
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the origins
and revisions of his paper idol.
ABOUT THE BIBLE
By New 10
XXXX
I am not a bible scholar nor have I read the bible, but I have books by
Scholar's who HAVE read the Bible. It would seem to me
that words spoken two thousand years ago would have a different meaning
today. From its translation from Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, English
during the course of history these past two thousand years there is some
words that get lost in translation.
Yes. There are a fair number of parts of the bible we simply do not really
know what they mean. One of the little unknowns of the Bible.
Some words of the new testament were neoglisms not explained.
We don't really know what Paul really meant. So old words in the OT
simply are a mystery. Some of the idioms don't really have any meaning
for us. The literal word for word translation is meaningless.
One other factor that we must take
into consideration and that is the Nicene counsel in the forth century
that took votes of what portion of the bible will be kept or discarded.
That didn't really happen. Those arguments happened outside and before
Nicea. Many works had been discarded a century before at least.
The final canon was only settled some 60 years later at the Council of
Carthage.
Another aspect we must take into consideration, there were further changes
in the bible by Monks sitting in their Monastery scriptorium rewriting
worn out bibles to
fit their religious and political views of their time. This is also true
about the King James Version that used the king James English that changed
the meanings of words. Just like each religious denomination does today to
slant the meaning towards their denomination and interpretation of the
Bible. Since the nineteen fifties religious denominations have changed the
meaning of the bible yet again to extricate the vulgar language from the
Bible. Did you know there was a time in the later part of the nineteenth
century there were parts of the bible thought to be too pornographic and
was censored by the moral police of the time? The truth be known, no one
really knows what the bible means. I see the Bible as a work of myth,
fable and folklore, not any different then the stories found in the
Grimm's brothers fairytales.
If you are not an etymologist, you don't know what the Bibles
means
or says, so who are you kidding?
--
Dance, monkeys, dance!
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
27 Dec 2004 11:28:28 AM |
|
|
Dr. Newto Joseph wrote:
I am not a bible scholar nor have I read the bible, but I have books
by
Scholar's who HAVE read the Bible. It would seem to me
that words spoken two thousand years ago would have a different
meaning
today. From its translation from Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin,
English
during the course of history these past two thousand years there is
some
words that get lost in translation.
This does not seem to me to be an objection specially to the bible,
tho; it's a complaint about *all* literature written other than in our
own time. If this idea has any validity, all of antique literature
vanishes. This is obscurantism.
In reality there is *some* truth in this. This is why wiggling about a
single word is meaningless. But the early Christians didn't worry
about it. How do we know? Well, we don't even know which language
Jesus spoke! Every word of the gospels is in Greek, yet he probably
spoke Aramaic. They changed every single word for another one; yet
they still considered it OK. So I think the question misconceived.
One other factor that we must take into consideration and that is
the Nicene counsel in the forth century that took votes of what
portion of the bible will be kept or discarded.
This is a myth: sorry. No such events took place at Nicaea.
Another aspect we must take into consideration, there were
further changes in the bible by Monks sitting in their
Monastery scriptorium rewriting worn out bibles to fit their
religious and political views of their time.
Since we rely on bibles much older than this time today, this can't be
an issue. But in fact we find negligible differences between the King
James version, the product of this process, and say an NIV, based on
ancient copies. So this too is mistaken.
Bible. Since the nineteen fifties religious denominations have
changed the
meaning of the bible yet again to extricate the vulgar language from
the
Bible. Did you know there was a time in the later part of the
nineteenth
century there were parts of the bible thought to be too pornographic
and was
censored by the moral police of the time?
No, I don't know this. I wonder to what you refer?
The truth be known, no one really knows what the bible means.
Not even you? How then can you say...
I see the Bible as a work of myth, fable and folklore, not any
different then the stories found in the Grimm's brothers
fairytales.
Really. But you tell us you haven't read it, and you tell us no-one
knows what it means... And I have some doubts you read Grimm either.
If you are not an etymologist, you don't know what the Bibles
means or says, so who are you kidding?
<chuckle>
One problem with atheists is that they think making themselves stupid
is an argument. Still, it gives harmless fun to the rest of us.
All the best,
Roger Pearse
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
24 Dec 2004 05:40:44 PM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false
Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for
many years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how
many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by
the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the
origins
and revisions of his paper idol.
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in some
way damaging to the Christians.
Second definition of an atheist: someone too stupid to check his facts.
All the best,
Roger Pearse
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
25 Dec 2004 10:41:13 AM |
|
|
<roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1103931643.995198.141070@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false
Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for
many years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how
many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by
the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the
origins
and revisions of his paper idol.
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in some
way damaging to the Christians.
Second definition of an atheist: someone too stupid to check his facts.
All the best,
Roger Pearse
Best definition of 'pompous arrogant *****': Roger Pearse.
All the best to you too,
Tom
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
25 Dec 2004 10:43:38 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 11:41:13 -0500, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:
<roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1103931643.995198.141070@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false
Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for
many years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how
many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by
the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the
origins
and revisions of his paper idol.
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in some
way damaging to the Christians.
Second definition of an atheist: someone too stupid to check his facts.
All the best,
Roger Pearse
Best definition of 'pompous arrogant *****': Roger Pearse.
You left out stupid, in-your-face nasty, transparent liar who fools
no-one but himself.
All the best to you too,
Tom
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
25 Dec 2004 12:58:59 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for many years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the
origins and revisions of his paper idol.
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in some
way damaging to the Christians.
<rofl!> Definition of a cultist: Someone who ignores history, truth, and
what his or her own eyes tells them.
Question #1 for the cultist: How did the Book of Ruth get into the
classical Christanic mythologies? <smile>
Question #2 for the Republican idiot: What happened to the so-called
"Infant Jesus" books that were once included in the classical Christanic
mythologies?
Right. The fucking cultist loses again.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
"Rightards... the other other white meat."
"And by the way - about the name you keep calling us --
"rightards". Very nice of your liberal sorry fucked
up ***** to come up with a name that debases mentally
disabled persons." -- Charlie Wolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
27 Dec 2004 04:32:24 AM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false
Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for
many years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how
many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies
by the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the
origins and revisions of his paper idol.
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in
some
way damaging to the Christians.
<rofl!> Definition of a cultist: Someone who ignores history, truth,
and
what his or her own eyes tells them.
Question #1 for the cultist: How did the Book of Ruth get into the
classical Christanic mythologies? <smile>
Question #2 for the Republican idiot: What happened to the so-called
"Infant Jesus" books that were once included in the classical
Christanic
mythologies?
Right. The fucking cultist loses again.
I'm still waiting for that dollar.
All the best,
Roger Pearse
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
27 Dec 2004 12:34:13 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE> wrote in message
news:10s78qkr1eget6b@corp.supernews.com...
You're a liar. Swaggart's message is 100% in accord with the
classical Christanic mythologies. It's you who's the false Christian.
Classical Christian concepts have been corrupted and false for many years.
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the
origins and revisions of his paper idol.
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in some
way damaging to the Christians.
<rofl!> Definition of a cultist: Someone who ignores history, truth, and
what his or her own eyes tells them.
Question #1 for the cultist: How did the Book of Ruth get into the
classical Christanic mythologies? <smile>
Golly! The cultists couldn't answer this.
Question #2 for the Republican idiot: What happened to the so-called
"Infant Jesus" books that were once included in the classical Christanic
mythologies?
And the cultist couldn't answer this.
Right. The fucking cultist loses again.
I'm still waiting for that dollar.
You're still waiting for a brain and some non-Christian honesty, idiot.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
"Rightards... the other other white meat."
"And by the way - about the name you keep calling us --
"rightards". Very nice of your liberal sorry fucked
up ***** to come up with a name that debases mentally
disabled persons." -- Charlie Wolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
27 Dec 2004 04:21:43 PM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in
some
way damaging to the Christians.
<rofl!> Definition of a cultist: Someone who ignores history,
truth, and
what his or her own eyes tells them.
Question #1 for the cultist: How did the Book of Ruth get into the
classical Christanic mythologies? <smile>
Golly! The cultists couldn't answer this.
Definition of an atheist: someone who presumes any jibe of his that
gets ignored must be ignored because of ignorance, fear, or terror.
Instead of boredom.
Question #2 for the Republican idiot: What happened to the
so-called
"Infant Jesus" books that were once included in the classical
Christanic
mythologies?
And the cultist couldn't answer this.
Ditto.
Right. The fucking cultist loses again.
I'm still waiting for that dollar.
You're still waiting for a brain and some non-Christian honesty,
idiot.
Indeed I am, little man. Also for some manners from you.
All the best,
Roger Pearse
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
28 Dec 2004 09:31:45 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
wrote:
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in some
way damaging to the Christians.
<rofl!> Definition of a cultist: Someone who ignores history, truth, and
what his or her own eyes tells them.
Question #1 for the cultist: How did the Book of Ruth get into the
classical Christanic mythologies? <smile>
Golly! The cultists couldn't answer this.
Definition of an atheist:
Woops! The cultist couldn't answer the question again.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
"Rightards... the other other white meat."
"And you deserve a cyanide enema."
"And by the way - about the name you keep calling us -- "rightards". Very
nice of your liberal sorry fucked up ***** to come up with a name that debases
mentally disabled persons." -- Charlie Wolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
28 Dec 2004 01:08:11 PM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of
Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it
in some
way damaging to the Christians.
<rofl!> Definition of a cultist: Someone who ignores history,
truth, and
what his or her own eyes tells them.
Question #1 for the cultist: How did the Book of Ruth get into
the
classical Christanic mythologies? <smile>
Golly! The cultists couldn't answer this.
Definition of an atheist:
Woops! The cultist couldn't answer the question again.
So I see. Sorry to see you can't spell either, or indeed quote
accurately.
Still, that's what atheism is all about, isn't it? <grin>
Ciao, loser.
All the best,
Roger Pearse
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
29 Dec 2004 11:53:00 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
wrote:
Definition of an atheist: someone who thinks the Council of Nicaea
edited the bible, not because he knows but because he thinks it in some
way damaging to the Christians.
<rofl!> Definition of a cultist: Someone who ignores history, truth, and
what his or her own eyes tells them.
Question #1 for the cultist: How did the Book of Ruth get into the
classical Christanic mythologies? <smile>
Golly! The cultists couldn't answer this.
Definition of an atheist:
Woops! The cultist couldn't answer the question again.
So I see.
And the reason why you couldn't is because you are well aware that you're
an idiot who has not a clue as to the origins of the paper idol you
worship.
As in everything in life you've experienced so far, you lose again.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
"And by the way - about the name you keep calling us -- "rightards". Very
nice of your liberal sorry fucked up ***** to come up with a name that debases
mentally disabled persons." -- Charlie Wolf
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Liberal" |
|
| Title: Re: ***** of God ***** |
25 Dec 2004 07:03:24 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 23:12:12 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
Christianity is nothing but. A buck says you have no idea how many
books were removed from the current version of the mythologies by the
various councils of Nicea, huh?
You're out a dollar. No books of the bible were removed by either
Council of Nicaea.
"No" as in several hundred, apparently. There were several
different versions for most of the "four gospels;" there were many
other books of holy scriptures that were voted upon and rejected.
One book of Holy Scripture, called the Infancy of Jesus Gospel,
has little Jesus running around killing his playmates in temper
tantrums and then ressurecting his playmates later after he
cal;med down. For the life of me I cannot imagine why this portion
of Holy Scripture was rejected.
<rofl!> And another Christian expresses his ignorance as to the origins
and revisions of his paper idol.
That's what Fundamentalist Christians do: ignore the truth.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
"Rightards... the other other white meat."
"And by the way - about the name you keep calling us --
"rightards". Very nice of your liberal sorry fucked
up ***** to come up with a name that debases mentally
disabled persons." -- Charlie Wolf
---
http://lastliberal.org
"The certainty of a god giving meaning to life far surpasses
in attractiveness the ability to behave badly with impunity."
--- ALBERT CAMUS (1913-1960), The Myth Of Sisyphus, 1942.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
