| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Iain" |
| Date: |
29 May 2004 07:36:01 AM |
| Object: |
-Re: Creation Design |
Bardi wrote:
Not meaning to interrupt the tirade going on, but if I might mention the
simple fact that being Christian does NOT mean one has to deny the theory of
evolution. In fact a good case can be made that Christians should believe in
the theory of evolution rather than creationism.
Not without compromising Genesis etcetera.
~Iain
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Creation Design |
01 Jun 2004 09:14:12 PM |
|
|
"Colin Day" <cday3@sc.rr.com> wrote
And is the New Testament also a parable (or collection
thereof)?
It certainly contains no shortage of parables, if that's what
you're asking.
The N.T. isn't just one thing though.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Colin Day" |
|
| Title: Re: Creation Design |
02 Jun 2004 10:21:46 AM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
"Colin Day" <cday3@sc.rr.com> wrote
And is the New Testament also a parable (or collection
thereof)?
It certainly contains no shortage of parables, if that's what
you're asking.
The N.T. isn't just one thing though.
OK. Are the accounts of the Crucifixion and Resurrection parables?
Colin Day
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Creation Design |
02 Jun 2004 10:47:19 PM |
|
|
"Colin Day" <cday3@sc.rr.com> wrote
OK. Are the accounts of the Crucifixion and Resurrection
parables?
They are an amalgam.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Colin Day" |
|
| Title: Re: Creation Design |
02 Jun 2004 11:22:24 PM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
"Colin Day" <cday3@sc.rr.com> wrote
OK. Are the accounts of the Crucifixion and Resurrection
parables?
They are an amalgam.
An amalgam of what? Is the Bible to be read as saying that Christ rose
from the dead, or is it not to be so read?
Colin Day aa #1500
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Creation Design |
02 Jun 2004 11:33:05 PM |
|
|
"Colin Day" <cday3@sc.rr.com> wrote
OK. Are the accounts of the Crucifixion and Resurrection
parables?
They are an amalgam.
An amalgam of what?
Numerous cultures, beliefs & traditions coupled with a little history.
Is the Bible to be read as saying that Christ rose
from the dead, or is it not to be so read?
I would say that it is not to be read at all.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas P." |
|
| Title: Re: -Re: Creation Design |
29 May 2004 01:52:14 PM |
|
|
On 29 May 2004 05:36:01 -0700, (Iain) wrote:
Bardi wrote:
Not meaning to interrupt the tirade going on, but if I might mention the
simple fact that being Christian does NOT mean one has to deny the theory of
evolution. In fact a good case can be made that Christians should believe in
the theory of evolution rather than creationism.
Not without compromising Genesis etcetera.
~Iain
Consistency has never been a problem for Christianity or a priority.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|