6. THE LIE THAT "LIVING THINGS POSSESS VESTIGAL ORGANS"
For a long time now it has been maintained in evolutionist sources that
some organs in living things serve no function, and that these are
evolutionary blind spots inherited from the evolutionary ancestors of
the creatures in question. For instance, the human appendix and coccyx
were for long years regarded as such vestigal organs. Yet the latest
scientific findings have revealed that all these organs do actually
have important functions.

10 NOTORIOUS DARWINIST FABRICATIONS

HARUN YAHYA
www.harunyahya.com

1. THE LIE THAT "IT HAS BEEN PROVED THAT LIFE COULD HAVE EMERGED BY
CHANCE ON THE PRIMITIVE EARTH"

2. THE LIE THAT "THE HUMAN EMBRYO HAS GILLS"

3. THE LIE THAT "NATURAL HISTORY CONFIRMS THE TREE OF LIFE"
Darwinism maintains that life on earth originated and developed from a
single root, subsequently splitting off into branches, like a tree.
Evolutionists have struggled to make natural history fit this claim for
150 years.

Yet natural history actually paints a diametrically opposed
picture. The fossil record shows that there was no "tree of life" and
that the basic groups of living things emerged suddenly and at the same
time. Almost all the known phyla (basic groups of living things)
emerged in the Cambrian period, some 530-520 million years ago. (see
The "Tree of Life" is Collapsing)

4. THE LIE THAT "ARCHAEOPTERYX IS THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN REPTILES AND
BIRDS"

The 150-million-year-old bird fossil known as Archaeopteryx has been
portrayed as "the greatest fossil evidence of evolution" since the 19th
century. It has been claimed that this fossil possesses certain
reptilian features, for which reason it is the "missing link" between
reptiles and birds. This claim has been invalidated, however, by recent
findings that prove that Archaeopteryx was a perfect flying bird.
Moreover, the alleged reptilian ancestors for birds, the theropod
dinosaurs, are all younger than Archaeopteryx in terms of their
appearance in the fossil record; a fact which evolutionists try to
hide. (see The Archaeopteryx Misconception)


5. THE LIE THAT "THE EVOLUTION OF THE HORSE HAS BEEN PROVEN BY THE
FOSSIL RECORD"
For decades now, 'the evolution of the horse' has been portrayed as one
of the best documented proofs of evolution. Four-legged mammals which
lived at different times have been lined up, from small to large, and
these "horse series" exhibited in museums of natural history. Research
in recent years, however, has revealed that the creatures in the series
were not one another's ancestors, that the sequence is gravely
mistaken, and that the creatures portrayed as the ancestors of the
horse actually emerged after the horse. (see The Myth of Horse
Evolution)

10 NOTORIOUS DARWINIST FABRICATIONS

HARUN YAHYA
www.harunyahya.com

1. THE LIE THAT "IT HAS BEEN PROVED THAT LIFE COULD HAVE EMERGED BY
CHANCE ON THE PRIMITIVE EARTH"

2. THE LIE THAT "THE HUMAN EMBRYO HAS GILLS"

3. THE LIE THAT "NATURAL HISTORY CONFIRMS THE TREE OF LIFE"

4. THE LIE THAT "ARCHAEOPTERYX IS THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN REPTILES AND
BIRDS"

5. THE LIE THAT "THE EVOLUTION OF THE HORSE HAS BEEN PROVEN BY THE
FOSSIL RECORD"

6. THE LIE THAT "LIVING THINGS POSSESS VESTIGAL ORGANS"

7. THE LIE THAT "VERTEBRATES' FIVE-FINGERED HAND STRUCTURE IS EVIDENCE
OF EVOLUTION"

8. THE LIE THAT "INDUSTRIAL MELLANISM IS EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION BY
NATURAL SELECTION"

9. THE LIE THAT "MUTATION EXPERIMENTS ARE PROOF OF EVOLUTION"

10. THE LIE THAT "FOSSILS PROVE THAT APE-MEN ONCE LIVED"

10 NOTORIOUS DARWINIST FABRICATIONS

HARUN YAHYA
www.harunyahya.com

1. THE LIE THAT "IT HAS BEEN PROVED THAT LIFE COULD HAVE EMERGED BY
CHANCE ON THE PRIMITIVE EARTH"
The only evidence cited in evolutionist sources is the 1953 Miller
Experiment. Yet no living cell was created in this experiment, just a
few amino-acids were synthesised.

amino-acids to form strings in the right sequence by chance and make
proteins, and for these to give rise to a cell.

2. THE LIE THAT "THE HUMAN EMBRYO HAS GILLS"

3. THE LIE THAT "NATURAL HISTORY CONFIRMS THE TREE OF LIFE"
Darwinism maintains that life on earth originated and developed from a
single root, subsequently splitting off into branches, like a tree.

Evolutionists have struggled to make natural history fit this claim for
150 years.

4. THE LIE THAT "ARCHAEOPTERYX IS THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN REPTILES AND
BIRDS"
The 150-million-year-old bird fossil known as Archaeopteryx has been
portrayed as "the greatest fossil evidence of evolution" since the 19th
century. It has been claimed that this fossil possesses certain
reptilian features, for which reason it is the "missing link" between
reptiles and birds.

5. THE LIE THAT "THE EVOLUTION OF THE HORSE HAS BEEN PROVEN BY THE
FOSSIL RECORD"
For decades now, 'the evolution of the horse' has been portrayed as one
of the best documented proofs of evolution.

6. THE LIE THAT "LIVING THINGS POSSESS VESTIGAL ORGANS"
For a long time now it has been maintained in evolutionist sources that
some organs in living things serve no function,

and that these are
evolutionary blind spots inherited from the evolutionary ancestors of
the creatures in question. For instance, the human appendix and coccyx
were for long years regarded as such vestigal organs.

7. THE LIE THAT "VERTEBRATES' FIVE-FINGERED HAND STRUCTURE IS EVIDENCE
OF EVOLUTION"
The dolphin's fin, the bat's wing and the human hand all contain a
five-fingered bone structure. This similarity has for a long time been
put forward in evolutionist schoolbooks or popular publications as
evidence they all evolved from a common ancestor.

Genetic research,
however, has shown that these organs, which seem so alike on the
surface, are actually controlled by very different genes. Evolutionists
today admit that "similar organs do not represent evidence of
evolution." (see The Fall of the Homology in Tetrapod Limbs)

8. THE LIE THAT "INDUSTRIAL MELLANISM IS EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION BY
NATURAL SELECTION"
Among the most frequently repeated so-called "proofs" of the theory of
evolution in the world is that of the moth population in Great Britain
during the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century. According to this
claim, air population darkened the colour of tree bark, which meant
that since dark coloured moths had better camouflage they were
protected from bird predators, as a result of which the dark coloured
moth population increased.

Yet this is not evolution, because no new
species of mothsemerged.

9. THE LIE THAT "MUTATION EXPERIMENTS ARE PROOF OF EVOLUTION"
Mutations are one of the two "evolutionary mechanisms" proposed by
neo-Darwinism. It is suggested that these chance modifications to DNA
caused living things to evolve.

10. THE LIE THAT "FOSSILS PROVE THAT APE-MEN ONCE LIVED"
Darwinism's mort prominent deception is the claim that man evolved from
ape-like creatures.

10 NOTORIOUS DARWINIST FABRICATIONS

HARUN YAHYA
www.harunyahya.com

1. THE LIE THAT "IT HAS BEEN PROVED THAT LIFE COULD HAVE EMERGED BY
CHANCE ON THE PRIMITIVE EARTH"
The only evidence cited in evolutionist sources is the 1953 Miller
Experiment. Yet no living cell was created in this experiment, just a
few amino-acids were synthesised. It is mathematically impossible for
amino-acids to form strings in the right sequence by chance and make
proteins, and for these to give rise to a cell. Miller's synthesised
amino-acids are of no significance, since his experiment used gasses
which were not present in the primitive atmosphere on earth. (see
Miller's Experiment)

2. THE LIE THAT "THE HUMAN EMBRYO HAS GILLS"

This claim rests on a scientific fraud committed by the evolutionist
biologist Ernst Haeckel at the beginning of the 20th century. In order
to come up with proof of evolution Haeckel created drawings of the
embryos of such living things as human beings, chickens and fish and
placed them side by side. Yet there were distortions in these images.
Today the whole scientific world recognises these as counterfeit. The
structure shown as a "gill" by Haeckel is actually the beginning of the
middle ear channel, the parathyroid and the thymus glands. (see The
Recapitulation Misconseption)

3. THE LIE THAT "NATURAL HISTORY CONFIRMS THE TREE OF LIFE"
Darwinism maintains that life on earth originated and developed from a
single root, subsequently splitting off into branches, like a tree.
Evolutionists have struggled to make natural history fit this claim for
150 years. Yet natural history actually paints a diametrically opposed
picture. The fossil record shows that there was no "tree of life" and
that the basic groups of living things emerged suddenly and at the same
time. Almost all the known phyla (basic groups of living things)
emerged in the Cambrian period, some 530-520 million years ago. (see
The "Tree of Life" is Collapsing)

4. THE LIE THAT "ARCHAEOPTERYX IS THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN REPTILES AND
BIRDS"
The 150-million-year-old bird fossil known as Archaeopteryx has been
portrayed as "the greatest fossil evidence of evolution" since the 19th
century. It has been claimed that this fossil possesses certain
reptilian features, for which reason it is the "missing link" between
reptiles and birds. This claim has been invalidated, however, by recent
findings that prove that Archaeopteryx was a perfect flying bird.
Moreover, the alleged reptilian ancestors for birds, the theropod
dinosaurs, are all younger than Archaeopteryx in terms of their
appearance in the fossil record; a fact which evolutionists try to
hide. (see The Archaeopteryx Misconception)

5. THE LIE THAT "THE EVOLUTION OF THE HORSE HAS BEEN PROVEN BY THE
FOSSIL RECORD"
For decades now, 'the evolution of the horse' has been portrayed as one
of the best documented proofs of evolution. Four-legged mammals which
lived at different times have been lined up, from small to large, and
these "horse series" exhibited in museums of natural history. Research
in recent years, however, has revealed that the creatures in the series
were not one another's ancestors, that the sequence is gravely
mistaken, and that the creatures portrayed as the ancestors of the
horse actually emerged after the horse. (see The Myth of Horse
Evolution)

6. THE LIE THAT "LIVING THINGS POSSESS VESTIGAL ORGANS"
For a long time now it has been maintained in evolutionist sources that
some organs in living things serve no function, and that these are
evolutionary blind spots inherited from the evolutionary ancestors of
the creatures in question. For instance, the human appendix and coccyx
were for long years regarded as such vestigal organs. Yet the latest
scientific findings have revealed that all these organs do actually
have important functions. The "list of vestigal organs" drawn up by
evolutionists at the beginning of the 20th century is now without
foundation. (see The Myth of Vestigal Organs)

7. THE LIE THAT "VERTEBRATES' FIVE-FINGERED HAND STRUCTURE IS EVIDENCE
OF EVOLUTION"
The dolphin's fin, the bat's wing and the human hand all contain a
five-fingered bone structure. This similarity has for a long time been
put forward in evolutionist schoolbooks or popular publications as
evidence they all evolved from a common ancestor. Genetic research,
however, has shown that these organs, which seem so alike on the
surface, are actually controlled by very different genes. Evolutionists
today admit that "similar organs do not represent evidence of
evolution." (see The Fall of the Homology in Tetrapod Limbs)

8. THE LIE THAT "INDUSTRIAL MELLANISM IS EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION BY
NATURAL SELECTION"
Among the most frequently repeated so-called "proofs" of the theory of
evolution in the world is that of the moth population in Great Britain
during the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century. According to this
claim, air population darkened the colour of tree bark, which meant
that since dark coloured moths had better camouflage they were
protected from bird predators, as a result of which the dark coloured
moth population increased. Yet this is not evolution, because no new
species of mothsemerged. All that happened was the population levels of
previously existing species changed. Moreover, recent works on the
story show that the story itself was not true at all; the famous
pictures of moths resting on trees were fake and no such "industrial
mellanism" (darkening of colour due to industrial pollution) ever took
place. (see The True Story of Industrial Melanism)

9. THE LIE THAT "MUTATION EXPERIMENTS ARE PROOF OF EVOLUTION"
Mutations are one of the two "evolutionary mechanisms" proposed by
neo-Darwinism. It is suggested that these chance modifications to DNA
caused living things to evolve. Thousands of mutation experiments have
been performed to back up this claim. Some populations of living
things, fruit flies in particular, have been subjected to intense
mutation. Evolutionist publications portray these mutation experiments
as "laboratory evidence of evolution." Yet the fact is that far from
confirming evolution these experiments have actually undermined it. In
not one living thing exposed to mutation has an increase in its genetic
information been observed. On the contrary, mutants (living things
exposed to mutation) are always deformed, sterile and sickly. (see
Mutations)

10. THE LIE THAT "FOSSILS PROVE THAT APE-MEN ONCE LIVED"
Darwinism's mort prominent deception is the claim that man evolved from
ape-like creatures. This claim has been imposed on society by means of
thousands of fictitious drawings and models. The fact is that there is
no evidence that 'ape-men' ever lived. Australopithecus, portrayed as
man's oldest ancestor, was actually an extinct ape species, not so very
different from modern chimpanzees. Classifications such as Homo
erectus, placed after Australopithecus in the evolutionary chain, Homo
sapiens neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens archaic, were all different
human races. (see The Imaginary Family Tree of Man)

2. THE LIE THAT "THE HUMAN EMBRYO HAS GILLS"

Today the whole scientific world recognises these as counterfeit.

10 NOTORIOUS DARWINIST FABRICATIONS

1. THE LIE THAT "IT HAS BEEN PROVED THAT LIFE COULD HAVE EMERGED BY CHANCE
ON THE PRIMITIVE EARTH"

10. THE LIE THAT "FOSSILS PROVE THAT APE-MEN ONCE LIVED"
Darwinism's mort prominent deception is the claim that man evolved from
ape-like creatures. This claim has been imposed on society by means of
thousands of fictitious drawings and models. The fact is that there is
no evidence that 'ape-men' ever lived. Australopithecus, portrayed as
man's oldest ancestor, was actually an extinct ape species, not so very
different from modern chimpanzees. Classifications such as Homo
erectus, placed after Australopithecus in the evolutionary chain, Homo
sapiens neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens archaic, were all different
human races. (see The Imaginary Family Tree of Man)