| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
20 Oct 2005 12:47:33 AM |
| Object: |
100,000 back bill to curb ACLU |
Americans are getting sick and tired of having decency and morality torn
from our social fabric by the ACLU. The days when they defended the
downtrodden are long past. They are nothing now but a tool for the liberal,
atheist establishment.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46784
100,000 back bill to curb ACLU
Petition urges Congress to act on legislation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
----
A grass-roots group is mobilizing more than 100,000 Americans to urge
Congress to pass a bill that would curb the ACLU by denying plaintiff
attorneys the right to collect attorneys fees in lawsuits targeting religion
in the public square.
The petition by the Center for Reclaiming America calls for "a stand against
the ACLU's radical agenda, which undermines our nation's moral and religious
heritage."
The group says it already has 100,000 signatures and hopes to garner another
30,000.
The petition reads:
As a concerned citizen, I am taking a stand against the ACLU's radical
agenda, which undermines our nation's moral and religious heritage. I join
with citizens across the nation in protest of ACLU policies and actions to
strip faith in God from the public square while promoting anti-family and
pro-homosexual initiatives. I am calling on leaders in government and media
to tell the truth about the ACLU's radical agenda. Furthermore, I demand
lawmakers take the necessary steps to eliminate the monetary motives behind
the ACLU's campaign to remove all mention of God from the public square. The
ACLU does not represent me nor the vast majority of American citizens.
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: 100,000 back bill to curb ACLU |
31 Oct 2005 05:46:14 PM |
|
|
Mimi Cohen wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"Mimi Cohen" <imnot@cox.net> wrote in message
news:RKU5f.9801$gj1.8044@fed1read05...
Attila wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 01:47:33 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<ArWdnfTPPMqWrcrenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Off topic again
Is he *EVER* on topic? :)
"She".
Are half the people here EVER on topic?
Wouldn't this be a boring place if they were? :)
Speaking of "boring", I wish you would do something abour *your*
contributions to this NG. Your stuff wither consists of one line
or some 5000 lines of cut and paste drivel.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 100,000 back bill to curb ACLU |
20 Oct 2005 08:30:17 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:10:20 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <1eX5f.9882$gj1.9493@fed1read05> wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"Mimi Cohen" <imnot@cox.net> wrote in message
news:RKU5f.9801$gj1.8044@fed1read05...
Attila wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 01:47:33 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<ArWdnfTPPMqWrcrenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Off topic again
Is he *EVER* on topic? :)
Are half the people here EVER on topic?
Wouldn't this be a boring place if they were? :)
No.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 100,000 back bill to curb ACLU |
20 Oct 2005 05:33:17 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:20:30 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <RKU5f.9801$gj1.8044@fed1read05> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 01:47:33 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<ArWdnfTPPMqWrcrenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Off topic again
Is he *EVER* on topic? :)
Seldom, but that is no reason not to call him on it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: 100,000 back bill to curb ACLU |
20 Oct 2005 06:43:47 PM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:20:30 -0700, Mimi Cohen <imnot@cox.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <RKU5f.9801$gj1.8044@fed1read05> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 01:47:33 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<ArWdnfTPPMqWrcrenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com> wrote:
Off topic again
Is he *EVER* on topic? :)
Seldom, but that is no reason not to call him on it.
Agree (hey this is becoming a habit <g>)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
