| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
16 Apr 2006 11:52:33 PM |
| Object: |
2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about today.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/ap/article.html?mi=D8H1HE7G0&apc=9001
Two registered sex offenders were fatally shot in their central Maine homes
early Sunday, and a Canadian man sought in connection with the slayings shot
himself after Boston police cornered him on a bus, Maine authorities said.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 01:42:42 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about today.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/ap/article.html?mi=D8H1HE7G0&apc=9001
Two registered sex offenders were fatally shot in their central Maine homes
early Sunday, and a Canadian man sought in connection with the slayings shot
himself after Boston police cornered him on a bus, Maine authorities said.
Just out of curiosity, howar you going to feel when you post such
rubbish and read a day later that they got the worng guy - the sex
offender had moved out and someone else had rented the place, only to
be killed because murderer didn't know about the change.
Just wait long enough and that is precisely what will happen: mabye
not with this incident, but eventually.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 07:20:19 AM |
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m33bgc3dvk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/ap/article.html?mi=D8H1HE7G0&apc=9001
Two registered sex offenders were fatally shot in their central Maine
homes
early Sunday, and a Canadian man sought in connection with the slayings
shot
himself after Boston police cornered him on a bus, Maine authorities
said.
Just out of curiosity, howar you going to feel when you post such
rubbish and read a day later that they got the worng guy - the sex
offender had moved out and someone else had rented the place, only to
be killed because murderer didn't know about the change.
Just wait long enough and that is precisely what will happen: mabye
not with this incident, but eventually.
I know when they were getting a tad hysterical in the UK about it - they
were hounding people out of their homes because they had the same name....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 07:28:31 AM |
|
|
On the auspictious date of Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:20:19 +0100, kathryn
said unto the multitude in message-id <ZpOdnTOa1M6bFd7ZRVnyuQ@bt.com>:
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m33bgc3dvk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/ap/article.html?mi=D8H1HE7G0&apc=9001
Two registered sex offenders were fatally shot in their central Maine
homes
early Sunday, and a Canadian man sought in connection with the slayings
shot
himself after Boston police cornered him on a bus, Maine authorities
said.
Just out of curiosity, howar you going to feel when you post such
rubbish and read a day later that they got the worng guy - the sex
offender had moved out and someone else had rented the place, only to
be killed because murderer didn't know about the change.
Just wait long enough and that is precisely what will happen: mabye
not with this incident, but eventually.
I know when they were getting a tad hysterical in the UK about it - they
were hounding people out of their homes because they had the same name....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4719364.stm
Whispering game
By Brendan O'Neill
The paediatrician confused with a paedophile has become a cautionary
tale against hysteria over sex offenders. But the details have become
confused, even down to whether it was a male or female doctor. What
really happened?
Whenever the debate about sex offenders rears its ugly head, we are
reminded of this incident and its cruel irony: how protesters targeted
a paediatrician (a doctor who cares for children) because his or her
job title sounded vaguely like paedophile (a sexual deviant attracted
to children).
Last month, when education secretary Ruth Kelly was under pressure to
reveal how many individuals on the Sex Offenders Register work in our
schools, various newspapers revisited the paediatrician/paedophile
story.
A columnist for the Independent criticised the tabloid attacks on
Kelly, warning that we might once again end up with a "howling mob"
consumed by a "paediatrician-bashing hysteria".
The Glasgow Herald lamented the current "hysteria over alleged sex
offenders", and reminded us of the "illiterate lynch mob" that
attacked the home of a paediatrician the last time there was such
hysteria.
Who what where
The paediatrician incident is mentioned endlessly, but rarely examined
in detail. Commentators refer to it all of the time but don't explain
where and when it took place, and what exactly happened.
There was indeed an incident, in 2000, involving a paediatrician who
was mistakenly labeled a "paedo", but there is little evidence that it
involved any kind of hysterical mob.
In fact, it was a relatively minor incident, which has been
exaggerated and distorted in the re-telling - and turned into a symbol
of mass hysteria among the tabloid-reading sections of the population.
If you search the web or back issues of newspapers to discover the
truth of the paediatrician-bashing incident, expect to be confused.
Some reports say a male paediatrician was attacked, others that it was
a female paediatrician.
There are clashing reports of where the incident took place. Some say
it was in south Wales, others that it was in Portsmouth. In an article
in 2001, the Daily Mail asked: "Who can forget the targeting of an
innocent children's doctor in Portsmouth by a populace too ignorant
and enraged to recognise the difference between paedophile and
paediatrician?"
An online magazine, The Register, also says that it was in Portsmouth
that "dictionary-starved and enraged mobs attacked a paediatrician".
Yet on a discussion board of a website that focuses on strange events,
one contributor says the incident took place in London.
Lynch mob
There are conflicting reports as to what happened. A 2001 Guardian
article says a female paediatrician was "hounded" from her home by her
own "neighbours, who confused 'paediatrician' with 'paedophile'."
Some reports say the outside of the paediatrician's home was daubed
with "paedo", others say the paediatrician woke one morning to find
"the term 'paedo' spray-painted all over her walls" - which suggests
breaking and entering as well as vandalism.
According to some accounts she was asleep in the house while the mob
vandalised it; according to others she only discovered the vandalism
upon returning from work. Some say it was far more serious than just
offensive graffiti.
In 2003, a Northern Irish newspaper recalled the time that "Portsmouth
became famous when paedophile-hunting locals chased a paediatrician
down the street" (there's that mention of Portsmouth again). This
account suggests the paediatrician may have been in real physical
danger.
A student newspaper at the University of Essex described how "a group
of people in Portsmouth... burned down a paediatrician's office in
righteous anger."
On one online discussion board it said that "a howling mob stoned [the
paediatrician's] house and firebombed it".
In the mainstream media, meanwhile, there are clashing reports over
whether the paediatrician was attacked, hounded, chased or abused, but
they all agree that it was an "hysterical mob" that did it.
Police talk
Just what is the truth? In August 2000, a female paediatrician
consultant called Yvette Cloete was indeed labelled a "paedo" after a
campaign by the News of the World to name and shame paedophiles in the
community.
The incident took place in Newport, Gwent, not in Portsmouth (where
there had been anti-paedophile protests after eight-year-old Sarah
Payne was murdered) or London.
It looks as though it was just a question of confusing the job title
for something else - I suppose I'm really a victim of ignorance
Yvette Cloete, speaking in 2000
Dr Cloete returned from work at the Royal Gwent Hospital to find
"paedo" spray-painted on her front door. Local police believe the
graffiti was written by someone who confused her job title with the
word paedophile.
It was no doubt a very distressing incident for Ms Cloete, who decided
to move home shortly afterwards. But there is no evidence that a mob
was involved or of any threats or incidents of physical pressure or
violence.
"Why let the truth get in the way of a good story?" says Chief
Inspector Andrew Adams, of Gwent Police, who was the liaison officer
in charge when news of this incident broke six years ago. He remembers
very well that stressful night, when he gave 18 live interviews to
various media outlets.
"There was no big mob," he says. "Nothing like that happened. I know
because I was there and I was involved. The lady was not in her home
when it happened. She came home from work to see her door daubed with
anti-paedophile graffiti.
"When we heard about it we set about dispelling the rumours that she
or anyone else in that house was a paedophile. We explained to the
local community the difference between paediatrician and paedophile."
Who did the graffiti? Mr Adams says he still isn't sure. "We think it
was youngsters, probably someone in the 12 to 17 age bracket."
And the community was outraged by the incident and "supportive of the
woman involved", he says.
Nevertheless, the story has taken on a life of its own, transformed
into a dire warning about hysterical mobs who threaten the fabric of
our nation.
The irony is that some in the media, in challenging the scaremongering
over sex offenders, indulge in some scaremongering of their own. They
raise fears about violent tabloid-reading protesters who will attack,
hound and destroy a paediatrician - which seem to be just as unfounded
as the fears about thousands of paedophiles stalking the land.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/magazine/4719364.stm
Published: 2006/02/16 12:25:42 GMT
© BBC MMVI
--
"Do unto others as you would have then do unto you".
- attrib: Pauline Réage.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 11:38:53 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:42:42 GMT, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net>
wrote in message <m33bgc3dvk.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>
<youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about today.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/ap/article.html?mi=D8H1HE7G0&apc=9001
Two registered sex offenders were fatally shot in their central Maine homes
early Sunday, and a Canadian man sought in connection with the slayings shot
himself after Boston police cornered him on a bus, Maine authorities said.
Just out of curiosity, howar you going to feel when you post such
rubbish and read a day later that they got the worng guy - the sex
offender had moved out and someone else had rented the place, only to
be killed because murderer didn't know about the change.
Just wait long enough and that is precisely what will happen: mabye
not with this incident, but eventually.
This is particularly likely to happen when the vigilantes don't bother
check facts or question sources, a common characteristic of the
religious right.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josef Balluch" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 06:20:33 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
... and I do not support vigilante justice, ...
Liar.
http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.atheism/msg/f1ebf6945ba14d9c?hl=en&
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 08:20:04 AM |
|
|
"Josef Balluch" <josef.balluch@sympatico.can> wrote in message
news:9SK0g.389$DR6.42677@news20.bellglobal.com...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
... and I do not support vigilante justice, ...
Liar.
http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.atheism/msg/f1ebf6945ba14d9c?hl=en&
Nice one!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 08:16:46 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barnacle Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 08:38:36 AM |
|
|
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
--
Just because I make stuff up
doesn't mean it's not true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 03:03:19 PM |
|
|
"Barnacle Bill" <quahog@fish.net> wrote in message
news:12476isbro2574d@corp.supernews.com...
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
Answer the question as stated. Answering a question with a question
is rude and puerile indicating a conflict in your reasoning.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
23 Apr 2006 08:16:47 PM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:NpydnTdjttkXad7ZnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Barnacle Bill" <quahog@fish.net> wrote in message
news:12476isbro2574d@corp.supernews.com...
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
Answer the question as stated. Answering a question with a question
is rude and puerile indicating a conflict in your reasoning.
His question is quite valid - why do you value the lives of pedophiles more
than their victims?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alohacyberian" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
24 Apr 2006 01:06:33 AM |
|
|
"Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@covad.net> wrote in message
news:121c8$444c26f8$45035f0d$25168@msgid.meganewsservers.com...
"Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:NpydnTdjttkXad7ZnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Barnacle Bill" <quahog@fish.net> wrote in message
news:12476isbro2574d@corp.supernews.com...
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
Answer the question as stated. Answering a question with a question
is rude and puerile indicating a conflict in your reasoning.
His question is quite valid - why do you value the lives of pedophiles
more
than their victims?
It's that same old elitist Leftwing Liberal double standard. The
Leftwingers spend oh, so much of their time bleating about victimhood, but,
only if the "victims" fall into the proper categories. I'm sure you've
noticed how much hoopla they hollered about victims of racial discrimination
from descendents of northern Europeans, corporations, Christians, law
enforcement agencies, Transportation Safety Administration, airport
screeners and so forth to the point of absurdity. But, if the victims are
say the result of radical Islamofascist murderers, the dead and maimed are
dismissed with a Leftwing Liberal flick of a limp wrist and it's the
Islamofascist killers who are victims of being misunderstood and/or being
"oppressed" by Westerners in general and Jews in particular. Anyone who is
a victim of a homosexual's criminal act is not a victim, it's the homosexual
who is the victim of the heterosexual society. And on and on ad nauseam.
KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website there are 3600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI or
CNN, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards & 150 foreign languages
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barnacle Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
18 Apr 2006 09:58:58 PM |
|
|
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"Barnacle Bill" <quahog@fish.net> wrote in message
news:12476isbro2574d@corp.supernews.com...
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
Answer the question as stated. Answering a question with a question
is rude and puerile indicating a conflict in your reasoning.
Bafflegab. The question is framed in such a way as to
minimize the consequences of raping children as opposed to
offing violent perverts. apples and bowling balls. These
weren't guys busted for public urination or jerking off in a
public toilet stall. They were child rapists.
--
Just because I make stuff up
doesn't mean it's not true.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Kaufmann" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 11:48:46 AM |
|
|
Barnacle Bill wrote:
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
Which crime is mentioned in the "Ten Commandments"?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 01:23:00 PM |
|
|
"Carl Kaufmann" <cwkaufmann@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4443C6EE.5000208@cox.net...
Barnacle Bill wrote:
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
Which crime is mentioned in the "Ten Commandments"?
Both.
Thou shalt not kill.
Thou shalt not covet they neighbor's goods.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barnacle Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
18 Apr 2006 08:43:50 AM |
|
|
On 2006-04-17, Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> wrote:
Barnacle Bill wrote:
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
Which crime is mentioned in the "Ten Commandments"?
The Ten Commandments does not list *crimes*. Child rape may
not be listed, but is there any doubt about the fact that it
is murder of a child's innocence and future life? Imagine
terror of being ten years old and being raped by some forty
year-old sweaty, wheezing lout. But then maybe YOU would like
that.
--
Just because I make stuff up
doesn't mean it's not true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
18 Apr 2006 12:22:15 PM |
|
|
"Barnacle Bill" <quahog@fish.net> wrote in message
news:1249r8m4avo4i6a@corp.supernews.com...
The Ten Commandments does not list *crimes*. Child rape may
not be listed, but is there any doubt about the fact that it
is murder of a child's innocence and future life? Imagine
terror of being ten years old and being raped by some forty
year-old sweaty, wheezing lout. But then maybe YOU would like
that.
On the other hand, how about if you are a 14-year-old boy and your hottie
teacher seduces you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barnacle Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
18 Apr 2006 09:48:42 PM |
|
|
On 2006-04-18, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"Barnacle Bill" <quahog@fish.net> wrote in message
news:1249r8m4avo4i6a@corp.supernews.com...
The Ten Commandments does not list *crimes*. Child rape may
not be listed, but is there any doubt about the fact that it
is murder of a child's innocence and future life? Imagine
terror of being ten years old and being raped by some forty
year-old sweaty, wheezing lout. But then maybe YOU would like
that.
"On the other hand, how about if you are a 14-year-old boy and your hottie
teacher seduces you?"
Heh heh... When I was 14, and in the ninth grade, there was a
hot teacher, not young as we saw it then, thirty or so. I
heard a rumor that she had fucked a student. The rumor turned
out to be true. It couldn't have happened to a nicer guy!
This teacher was about the sexiest I have ever known. Not
only was she sexy, but very popular, even with the girls.
Never got in any trouble and when she left to get married,
everyone missed her.
This all happened in '61-'62. Her skirts were rather daring
for those days, and she had this walk. If you paid attention
in class, sometimes she would sit on her desk and give a show
that would make Sharon Stone blush. This was in the days when
a peek at stocking tops and garters was a turn-on. There was
not a limp ***** in the room. She would always call on boys to
go write something on the board at those times. I still get a
woodie just thinking about it.
Sometimes I wonder what she is doing now. She would be about
70 now. I'll bet she's still good looking.
--
Just because I make stuff up
doesn't mean it's not true.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Kaufmann" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 11:49:17 AM |
|
|
Barnacle Bill wrote:
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
Which crime is mentioned in the "Ten Commandments"?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 04:13:09 PM |
|
|
Barnacle Bill wrote:
On 2006-04-17, Geoff <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:TKadnZyVOJSdgt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@giganews.com...
Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Which is the worse sin, a sex offense or murder?
You mean what's worse, killing a worthless piece of *****
paedophile, or the life-long suffering of his twelve year-old
victim?
It doesn't really make a difference place
in a moron like Boston, since they
only hire moron Florida cops anyway.
--
Just because I make stuff up
doesn't mean it's not true.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 05:57:23 AM |
|
|
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sight?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a little
more critical of "these" perverts...
.
|
|
|
| User: "cmdr buzz corey" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
17 Apr 2006 03:34:23 PM |
|
|
Parsifal wrote:
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sight?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a little
more critical of "these" perverts...
I support the death penalty and sounds like these two sex perverts got
just what they deserved. Two less perverts that will never molest again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bernard Hubbard" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
20 Apr 2006 02:25:01 AM |
|
|
On 17 Apr 2006 13:34:23 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
<cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
Parsifal wrote:
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sight?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a little
more critical of "these" perverts...
I support the death penalty and sounds like these two sex perverts got
just what they deserved. Two less perverts that will never molest again.
Except that one was not a pervert, he had recently moved to the
address where a pervert had previously lived. That's the is problem
with vigilante justice.
--
"Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
handicapped."~Elbert Hubbard to quote a relative of mine.
Bernard Hubbard
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
20 Apr 2006 06:50:49 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:25:01 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 13:34:23 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
<cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
Parsifal wrote:
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sight?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a little
more critical of "these" perverts...
I support the death penalty and sounds like these two sex perverts got
just what they deserved. Two less perverts that will never molest again.
Except that one was not a pervert, he had recently moved to the
address where a pervert had previously lived. That's the is problem
with vigilante justice.
It does point out the importance of having a question on the topic on
one's apartment hunting form. Everyone looking should well consider
now adding the question:
"Has a homosexual male ever occupied this dwelling?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bernard Hubbard" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
21 Apr 2006 03:08:04 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:50:49 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:25:01 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 13:34:23 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
<cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
Parsifal wrote:
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sight?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a little
more critical of "these" perverts...
I support the death penalty and sounds like these two sex perverts got
just what they deserved. Two less perverts that will never molest again.
Except that one was not a pervert, he had recently moved to the
address where a pervert had previously lived. That's the is problem
with vigilante justice.
It does point out the importance of having a question on the topic on
one's apartment hunting form. Everyone looking should well consider
now adding the question:
"Has a homosexual male ever occupied this dwelling?".
I rather think that you mean has any paedophile, male or female, lived
in this apartment.
--
"Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
handicapped."~Elbert Hubbard to quote a relative of mine.
Bernard Hubbard
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
21 Apr 2006 08:33:55 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:08:04 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:50:49 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:25:01 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 13:34:23 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
<cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
Parsifal wrote:
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sight?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a little
more critical of "these" perverts...
I support the death penalty and sounds like these two sex perverts got
just what they deserved. Two less perverts that will never molest again.
Except that one was not a pervert, he had recently moved to the
address where a pervert had previously lived. That's the is problem
with vigilante justice.
It does point out the importance of having a question on the topic on
one's apartment hunting form. Everyone looking should well consider
now adding the question:
"Has a homosexual male ever occupied this dwelling?".
I rather think that you mean has any paedophile, male or female, lived
in this apartment.
Wrong thinking. On a 'per capita basis' homosexuals sexually abuse
far, far more children than do heterosexuals. So, add to your
apartment hunting guide; "Has a homosexual male ever occupied this
dwelling." If the answer is "Yes", run like scalded ape.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
21 Apr 2006 08:38:23 AM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:08:04 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
=20
=20
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:50:49 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@r=E2lant.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:25:01 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 13:34:23 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
<cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
Parsifal wrote:
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilant=
e
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry ab=
out
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet =
you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE=
for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sigh=
t?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a li=
ttle
more critical of "these" perverts...
I support the death penalty and sounds like these two sex perverts g=
ot
just what they deserved. Two less perverts that will never molest ag=
ain.
Except that one was not a pervert, he had recently moved to the
address where a pervert had previously lived. That's the is problem
with vigilante justice.
It does point out the importance of having a question on the topic on
one's apartment hunting form. Everyone looking should well consider
now adding the question:
"Has a homosexual male ever occupied this dwelling?".
I rather think that you mean has any paedophile, male or female, lived
in this apartment.
=20
=20
Wrong thinking. On a 'per capita basis' homosexuals sexually abuse
far, far more children than do heterosexuals.=20
And your evidence for this is... what?
--=20
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "tulle" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
21 Apr 2006 10:40:53 AM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:08:04 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:50:49 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@r=E2lant.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:25:01 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 13:34:23 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
<cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
Parsifal wrote:
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry ab=
out
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet =
you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE=
for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sigh=
t?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a li=
ttle
more critical of "these" perverts...
I support the death penalty and sounds like these two sex perverts g=
ot
just what they deserved. Two less perverts that will never molest ag=
ain.
Except that one was not a pervert, he had recently moved to the
address where a pervert had previously lived. That's the is problem
with vigilante justice.
It does point out the importance of having a question on the topic on
one's apartment hunting form. Everyone looking should well consider
now adding the question:
"Has a homosexual male ever occupied this dwelling?".
I rather think that you mean has any paedophile, male or female, lived
in this apartment.
Wrong thinking. On a 'per capita basis' homosexuals sexually abuse
far, far more children than do heterosexuals.
And your evidence for this is... what?
He has no evidence. He never lets facts get in the way of his bigotry.
If the truth does not bare out what he wants he just makes things up to
support his position.
tulle
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
=20
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
21 Apr 2006 12:29:12 PM |
|
|
On 21 Apr 2006 08:40:53 -0700, "tulle" <tulle040657@yahoo.com> wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:08:04 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:50:49 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:25:01 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 13:34:23 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
<cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
Parsifal wrote:
*Although I oppose the death penalty, and I do not support vigilante
justice,
*I can happily state that Maine now has 2 less perverts to worry about
today.
Sorry, but you just stated that you opposed death penalty, and yet you
rejoice over the death of 2 persons. What's the difference? You ARE for
death penalty. More proof that you're a fascist...
God, you're revolting J Young...
Besides, does it mean that we can now shoot rapists-priests on sight?
I'd like, for a change, see your legendary sense of decency be a little
more critical of "these" perverts...
I support the death penalty and sounds like these two sex perverts got
just what they deserved. Two less perverts that will never molest again.
Except that one was not a pervert, he had recently moved to the
address where a pervert had previously lived. That's the is problem
with vigilante justice.
It does point out the importance of having a question on the topic on
one's apartment hunting form. Everyone looking should well consider
now adding the question:
"Has a homosexual male ever occupied this dwelling?".
I rather think that you mean has any paedophile, male or female, lived
in this apartment.
Wrong thinking. On a 'per capita basis' homosexuals sexually abuse
far, far more children than do heterosexuals.
And your evidence for this is... what?
He has no evidence. He never lets facts get in the way of his bigotry.
If the truth does not bare out what he wants he just makes things up to
support his position.
tulle
You fucking dim witted idiots! It's common knowledge! Do you need
evidence that the sun will rise in the east tomorrow morning? The
knowledge that homosexuals on a per capita basis abuse children
considerably more than heterosexuals do is just as fundamental and
well known. Read something other than the mutual masturbation in your
queer Internet community -- find out what's happening in the REAL
WORLD. You might then understand why heterosexuals find you so fucking
repulsive and disgusting.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
21 Apr 2006 06:34:37 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On 21 Apr 2006 08:40:53 -0700, "tulle" <tulle040657@yahoo.com> wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:08:04 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:50:49 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:25:01 +1000, Bernard Hubbard
<bernard1958@west.net.au> wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 13:34:23 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
<cmdr-buzz-corey@mailcity.com> wrote:
Parsifal wrote:
<snip>
Wrong thinking. On a 'per capita basis' homosexuals sexually abuse
far, far more children than do heterosexuals.
And your evidence for this is... what?
He has no evidence. He never lets facts get in the way of his bigotry.
If the truth does not bare out what he wants he just makes things up to
support his position.
tulle
You fucking dim witted
<snip rant>
Read something other than the mutual masturbation in your
queer Internet community -- find out what's happening in the REAL
WORLD. You might then understand why heterosexuals find you so fucking
repulsive and disgusting.
You mean something from the REAL world like this peer reviewed research?
SEARCH STRING: su:(homosexual and pedophilia)
DATABASE: Medline
RECORD NO.: 94277737
AUTHOR: Jenny C; Roesler TA; Poyer KL
ADDRESS: Kempe Children's Center, Department of Pediatrics,
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.
TITLE: Are children at risk for sexual abuse by
homosexuals? [see comments]
SOURCE: Pediatrics (OXV), 1994 Jul; 94 (1): 41-4
LANGUAGE: English
COUNTRY PUB.: UNITED STATES
ANNOUNCEMENT: 9409
PUB. TYPE: JOURNAL ARTICLE
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE. To determine if recognizably homosexual
adults are frequently accused of the sexual molestation
of children.
DESIGN. Chart review of medical records of children
evaluated for sexual abuse.
SETTING. Child sexual abuse clinic at a regional
children's hospital.
PATIENTS. Patients were 352 children (276 girls and 76
boys)referred to a subspecialty clinic for the
evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse. Mean age was
6.1 years (range, 7 months to 17 years).
DATA COLLECTED. Charts were reviewed to determine the
relationships of the children to the alleged offender,
the sex of the offender, and whether or not the
alleged offender was reported to be gay, lesbian, or
bisexual.
RESULTS. Abuse was ruled out in 35 cases.
Seventy-four children were allegedly abused by other
children and teenagers less than 18 years old.
In 9 cases, an offender could not be identified
In the remaining 269 cases, two offenders were
identified as being gay or lesbian.
In 82% of cases (222/269), the alleged offender was a
heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Using the
*data from our study*, the *95% confidence*
limits, of *the risk children would identify*
recognizably *homosexual adults* as *the potential
abuser*, are *from 0% to 3.1%*. *These limits are within
current estimates of the prevalence of homosexuality in the general
community*.
*CONCLUSIONS.* The children in the group studied were
*unlikely to have been molested by* identifiably *gay or
lesbian people*.
NOTES: Comment in: Pediatrics, 1994 Jul;94(1):45-6
MESH HEADINGS: Child Abuse, Sexual--epidemiology (EP)*;
Homosexuality--psychology (*PX); Adolescence; Child;
Child, Preschool; Infant; Pedophilia; Female;
Human; Male
STANDARD NO.: 0031-4005
DATES: Entered 940719
<*Emphasis* added>
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: 2 registered sex offenders killed in Maine |
21 Apr 2006 06:47:36 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:34:37 -0400, "L. Michael Roberts"
<L_Michael_Roberts@nospam.com> wrote in message
<aLednSvMU92Q8dTZnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@golden.net>
...
... [snip sttempted retort by vulgar thug]
...
You mean something from the REAL world like this peer reviewed research?
SEARCH STRING: su:(homosexual and pedophilia)
DATABASE: Medline
RECORD NO.: 94277737
AUTHOR: Jenny C; Roesler TA; Poyer KL
ADDRESS: Kempe Children's Center, Department of Pediatrics,
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.
TITLE: Are children at risk for sexual abuse by
homosexuals? [see comments]
SOURCE: Pediatrics (OXV), 1994 Jul; 94 (1): 41-4
LANGUAGE: English
COUNTRY PUB.: UNITED STATES
ANNOUNCEMENT: 9409
PUB. TYPE: JOURNAL ARTICLE
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE. To determine if recognizably homosexual
adults are frequently accused of the sexual molestation
of children.
DESIGN. Chart review of medical records of children
evaluated for sexual abuse.
SETTING. Child sexual abuse clinic at a regional
children's hospital.
PATIENTS. Patients were 352 children (276 girls and 76
boys)referred to a subspecialty clinic for the
evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse. Mean age was
6.1 years (range, 7 months to 17 years).
DATA COLLECTED. Charts were reviewed to determine the
relationships of the children to the alleged offender,
the sex of the offender, and whether or not the
alleged offender was reported to be gay, lesbian, or
bisexual.
RESULTS. Abuse was ruled out in 35 cases.
Seventy-four children were allegedly abused by other
children and teenagers less than 18 years old.
In 9 cases, an offender could not be identified
In the remaining 269 cases, two offenders were
identified as being gay or lesbian.
In 82% of cases (222/269), the alleged offender was a
heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Using the
*data from our study*, the *95% confidence*
limits, of *the risk children would identify*
recognizably *homosexual adults* as *the potential
abuser*, are *from 0% to 3.1%*. *These limits are within
current estimates of the prevalence of homosexuality in the general
community*.
*CONCLUSIONS.* The children in the group studied were
*unlikely to have been molested by* identifiably *gay or
lesbian people*.
NOTES: Comment in: Pediatrics, 1994 Jul;94(1):45-6
MESH HEADINGS: Child Abuse, Sexual--epidemiology (EP)*;
Homosexuality--psychology (*PX); Adolescence; Child;
Child, Preschool; Infant; Pedophilia; Female;
Human; Male
STANDARD NO.: 0031-4005
DATES: Entered 940719
<*Emphasis* added>
Also available at http://tinyurl.com/nkpge
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
