| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
23 Jan 2005 01:57:59 PM |
| Object: |
46,106,000 now dead from............. |
.........the inhuman act of elective abortion at the hands of the butcher.
In the last year, another 1,060,000 innocent lives have been taken by the most
hideous and selfish act of human hatefulness - elective abortion.
The supporters will stand before God at their own time of death to answer for
their atrocious butchering of the innocent human unborn.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
23 Jan 2005 04:06:18 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:o0b7v01q9kiauhfscrm489cci96fj7r18n@4ax.com...
........the inhuman act of elective abortion at the hands of the butcher.
In the last year, another 1,060,000 innocent lives have been taken by the
most
hideous and selfish act of human hatefulness - elective abortion.
The supporters will stand before God at their own time of death to answer
for
their atrocious butchering of the innocent human unborn.
duke
Great Duke. God will punish them. What are you doing to prevent it now?
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
23 Jan 2005 05:36:49 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:06:18 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:o0b7v01q9kiauhfscrm489cci96fj7r18n@4ax.com...
........the inhuman act of elective abortion at the hands of the butcher.
In the last year, another 1,060,000 innocent lives have been taken by the
most
hideous and selfish act of human hatefulness - elective abortion.
The supporters will stand before God at their own time of death to answer
for
their atrocious butchering of the innocent human unborn.
duke
Great Duke. God will punish them. What are you doing to prevent it now?
Stated.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
23 Jan 2005 08:53:18 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:s4o7v018qtan5vegdr605dqlguikd6ghm1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:06:18 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:o0b7v01q9kiauhfscrm489cci96fj7r18n@4ax.com...
........the inhuman act of elective abortion at the hands of the
butcher.
In the last year, another 1,060,000 innocent lives have been taken by
the
most
hideous and selfish act of human hatefulness - elective abortion.
The supporters will stand before God at their own time of death to
answer
for
their atrocious butchering of the innocent human unborn.
duke
Great Duke. God will punish them. What are you doing to prevent it now?
Stated.
duke
Stated what?. What are you doing to prevent abortion?
--
And what about Cain and Abel? I can just hear the Lord saying, "Vegetables,
you offer me lousy vegetables! Get outta town you silly wimp!"
The Cain says "Man that God really burns me up! I'll teach Him a lesson! He
wants meat does He? I'll show Him some fresh meat!"
then he says to Abel, "Hey Smartass! Take that! (Whack) And that! (Whack!)
And that! (Whack!) And that! (Whack!) And that! (Whack!) And that! (Whack!)
And that! (Whack!) And that! (Whack!) And that! (Whack!)
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
23 Jan 2005 10:22:01 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:53:18 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote:
The supporters will stand before God at their own time of death to
answer for their atrocious butchering of the innocent human unborn.
Great Duke. God will punish them. What are you doing to prevent it now?
Stated.
Stated what?. What are you doing to prevent abortion?
Working to overturn Roe v Wade, and make abortion at least man slaughter with
mandatory jail time for the health official doing them.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
24 Jan 2005 03:26:30 AM |
|
|
In article <np88v0hsdm6of7v3lnfgp86f3etcei0l9r@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:53:18 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote:
The supporters will stand before God at their own time of death to
answer for their atrocious butchering of the innocent human unborn.
Great Duke. God will punish them. What are you doing to prevent it now?
Stated.
Stated what?. What are you doing to prevent abortion?
Working to overturn Roe v Wade, and make abortion at least man slaughter with
mandatory jail time for the health official doing them.
Oh, now you've downgraded it to manslaughter. What a fucking pathetic
chickenshit you are. BTW, why are you only focusing on the service
provider now? You were telling me that you wanted to put the women in
jail for "murder" as well just a little while ago. Did you wake up for
one microsecond in your life and realize that there wouldn't be enough
room in prison to hold them?
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
24 Jan 2005 11:42:12 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:26:30 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Working to overturn Roe v Wade, and make abortion at least man slaughter with
mandatory jail time for the health official doing them.
Oh, now you've downgraded it to manslaughter.
As a minimum. And guaranteed jail time.
What a fucking pathetic
chickenshit you are.
You're the one that promotes the butchery of the human unborn for mommie's
comfort and comfort, not me.
BTW, why are you only focusing on the service
provider now?
I always have. He should go to jail.
You were telling me that you wanted to put the women in
jail for "murder" as well just a little while ago.
Yep.
Did you wake up for
one microsecond in your life and realize that there wouldn't be enough
room in prison to hold them?
It's called a tent city, little one. And make it a crime and it'll slow
dramatically.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
26 Jan 2005 04:28:17 PM |
|
|
In article <1gn9v09rdpg1g8ufumuftn1rplesv3b1sg@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:26:30 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Working to overturn Roe v Wade, and make abortion at least man slaughter with
mandatory jail time for the health official doing them.
Oh, now you've downgraded it to manslaughter.
As a minimum.
You're still a chickenshit, duke.
And guaranteed jail time.
There aren't enough jails and, in any event, how are you even going to
know that a woman was pregnant? Are you going to have women tested
every month? You clearly haven't thought about this subject in any
serious way.
What a fucking pathetic
chickenshit you are.
You're the one that promotes the butchery of the human unborn
If you believe that then why just make it "manslaughter" which is
killing without malice and/or intention. Oh, I see, you're too stupid
to actually know what manslaughter means. You constant "butchery"
***** also indicates that you're too stupid to understand what non-
surgical abortion is.
for mommie's
comfort and comfort, not me.
I've already explained to you that pregnancy can imperil the life of the
mother. Therefore, it can be regarded as justifiable self-defense.
BTW, why are you only focusing on the service
provider now?
I always have.
That was not your only focus. You also included pregnant women who
might take drugs prescribed by their doctors to end pregnancies. A
woman does not become a "health official" by taking a prescribed drug,
but you still said, "To jail with them for murder" and "they won't allow
pill delivery in prison". Why is it that you've decided that she
committed "murder" whereas abortion doctors can get off with
"manslaughter"? If a woman is culpable of "murder" for taking a
prescribed pill then why do you not hold her culpable for asking and
paying a doctor to perform the same thing surgically?
He should go to jail.
Why are you assuming that provider is always a "he"? Haven't you heard
of women doctors?
You were telling me that you wanted to put the women in
jail for "murder" as well just a little while ago.
Yep.
It zoomed right past you.
Did you wake up for
one microsecond in your life and realize that there wouldn't be enough
room in prison to hold them?
It's called a tent city, little one.
It's called a concentration camp you fascist wannabe.
And make it a crime and it'll slow
dramatically.
You've already been shown evidence to the contrary, but you continue to
stupidy ignore it.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
29 Jan 2005 06:08:26 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:28:17 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
said in alt.atheism:
In article <1gn9v09rdpg1g8ufumuftn1rplesv3b1sg@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
And make it a crime and it'll slow dramatically.
You've already been shown evidence to the contrary, but you continue to
stupidy ignore it.
If he's really 62, and he didn't sleep through his first 40 years, he
already knows that abortion was rampant while it was illegal.
--
"If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can
solve them."
-Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
27 Jan 2005 12:00:49 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:28:17 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
And guaranteed jail time.
There aren't enough jails and, in any event, how are you even going to
know that a woman was pregnant?
Well, dummy, it's like any murder case. It takes evidence of purpose.
What a fucking pathetic
chickenshit you are.
You're the one that promotes the butchery of the human unborn
If you believe that then why just make it "manslaughter" which is
killing without malice and/or intention.
I'm not a lawyer. I don't think it is a capital offense subject to the death
penalty. So whether it's manslaughter or murder 2 is best left to the courts to
decide.
Oh, I see, you're too stupid
to actually know what manslaughter means.
It's pretty obvious that neither of us knows the definition. I'm an engineer,
not a lawyer.
for mommie's
comfort and comfort, not me.
I've already explained to you that pregnancy can imperil the life of the
mother. Therefore, it can be regarded as justifiable self-defense.
And I agreed with special dispensation. Or have you forgotten that already?
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
27 Jan 2005 03:06:55 AM |
|
|
In article <1ibgv0lbubsiovhltnireqojnf5r7ni25p@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:28:17 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
And guaranteed jail time.
There aren't enough jails and, in any event, how are you even going to
know that a woman was pregnant?
Well, dummy, it's like any murder case. It takes evidence of purpose.
The question was how you obtained that evidence, you stupid piece of
*****. It's obvious that you will need fucking evidence to attempt to
prosecute someone for murder, dumbass. So, is the plan to inspect every
woman's uterus on a monthly basis? Do you think you'll always be able
to tell if a miscarriage was intentional or not? Are you going to
outlaw coathangers too?
What a fucking pathetic
chickenshit you are.
You're the one that promotes the butchery of the human unborn
If you believe that then why just make it "manslaughter" which is
killing without malice and/or intention.
I'm not a lawyer.
No fucking kidding. You're a complete ignoramus on matters of the law
and just about everything else. The problem is that your ignorant *****
has been sounding off about matters of the law, which you now admit that
you don't know jack ***** about.
I don't think it is a capital offense subject to the death
penalty.
You nicely demonstrated that you don't have a fucking clue with that
little serving of word salad.
So whether it's manslaughter or murder 2 is best left to the courts to
decide.
Then you should have, but you fucked up and already make that judgment,
arbitrarily saying that abortion doctors would end up with manslaughter
while the women might be jailed for murder. Of course, because only a
few people like you are enough of an idiot to trivialize murder down to
the destruction of a zygote, it's really a moot point, because there's
no way that our justice system will ever adopt your ludicrous
suggestions.
Oh, I see, you're too stupid
to actually know what manslaughter means.
It's pretty obvious that neither of us knows the definition.
Wrong. I certainly do know the definition, but thanks for admitting
that you were using the term without knowing what the ***** you were
talking about.
I'm an engineer,
not a lawyer.
Then why don't you stay out of issues of law, like abortion, altogether,
fool?
for mommie's
comfort and comfort, not me.
I've already explained to you that pregnancy can imperil the life of the
mother. Therefore, it can be regarded as justifiable self-defense.
And I agreed with special dispensation. Or have you forgotten that already?
You aren't paying attention. The above describes pregnancy in general,
not a special case. Pregnancy in general is over ten times more
dangerous to the mother than terminating the pregnancy. Therefore, what
you've apparently agreed to is that women in general should have a
special dispensation to abortion on demand, since it could always be
regarded as a form of self-defense. You've really managed to get your
***** kicked badly on the topic of abortion, no that you don't get your
***** kicked in every debate. But you got totally trounced in this
thread. You really should go hide your ugly face in shame.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
27 Jan 2005 09:25:09 PM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c6208becd28d45d989b94@news.individual.net...
In article <1ibgv0lbubsiovhltnireqojnf5r7ni25p@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:28:17 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:
<snip>
You aren't paying attention. The above describes pregnancy in general,
not a special case. Pregnancy in general is over ten times more
dangerous to the mother than terminating the pregnancy. Therefore, what
you've apparently agreed to is that women in general should have a
special dispensation to abortion on demand, since it could always be
regarded as a form of self-defense. You've really managed to get your
***** kicked badly on the topic of abortion, no that you don't get your
***** kicked in every debate. But you got totally trounced in this
thread. You really should go hide your ugly face in shame.
Duke already glossed over the fact that there are more abortions under
anti-abortion Bush and that the downtrend is being reversed now. He ignores
facts, and just natters on as though he were doing something to save the
unborn by his irrational yakkity yak. When I asked what he was doing to
prevent abortion, he just mumbled an incoherent answer, and now this
garbage.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
28 Jan 2005 07:38:50 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:25:09 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote:
Duke already glossed over the fact that there are more abortions under
anti-abortion Bush and that the downtrend is being reversed now.
No need to gloss over it. Bush has nothing to do with it. I'm not surprised
you don't understand that.
He ignores
facts,
You mean like that were 1,060,000 abortions in the US last year.
and just natters on as though he were doing something to save the
unborn by his irrational yakkity yak. When I asked what he was doing to
prevent abortion, he just mumbled an incoherent answer, and now this
garbage.
I work to save the unborn, you work to murder the unborn. You will stand before
god to answer for that.
10-4 howdy doody.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
29 Jan 2005 01:52:54 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:815lv01uuigglcomgbmr3n1dlb335dudfl@4ax.com...
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:25:09 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
wrote:
Duke already glossed over the fact that there are more abortions under
anti-abortion Bush and that the downtrend is being reversed now.
No need to gloss over it. Bush has nothing to do with it. I'm not
surprised
you don't understand that.
He ignores
facts,
You mean like that were 1,060,000 abortions in the US last year.
and just natters on as though he were doing something to save the
unborn by his irrational yakkity yak. When I asked what he was doing to
prevent abortion, he just mumbled an incoherent answer, and now this
garbage.
I work to save the unborn, you work to murder the unborn. You will stand
before
god to answer for that.
Aside from claiming that it's only a coincidence that the long downtrend in
abortion is now reversed, and that per-capita aboritons are often higher in
red states than blue states, leaving that aside, you still haven't said what
you are doing to prevent abortion. Other than just being against it, and
paying lip-service to prohibitionism. Probably nothing. Leaving aside
whether a technology can successfully be prohibited, how are you actually
working to reduce abortions?
10-4 howdy doody.
Moreover, if you are against abortion for religious reasons, how can telling
atheists that, help to decrease the number of abortions?
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
29 Jan 2005 06:13:14 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 01:52:54 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
said in alt.atheism:
paying lip-service to prohibitionism. Probably nothing. Leaving aside
whether a technology can successfully be prohibited, how are you actually
working to reduce abortions?
Technology? Human women have been aborting pregnancies for 35,000
years that we know of.
--
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is
a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the
crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due
to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious
indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility
corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of
nature and of our own being."
- Albert Einstein to Guy H. Raner Jr., Sept. 28, 1949, from article by
Michael R. Gilmore in Skeptic magazine, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1997
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
30 Jan 2005 12:40:02 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:0aamv0h6i8sd8kue8rfsj0n25jagobd9pf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 01:52:54 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
said in alt.atheism:
paying lip-service to prohibitionism. Probably nothing. Leaving aside
whether a technology can successfully be prohibited, how are you actually
working to reduce abortions?
Technology? Human women have been aborting pregnancies for 35,000
years that we know of.
Now abortion is a technology because modern medicine is technological.
that's the kind of thing trying to nbe outlawed because it is much safer and
more effective than outright infanticide or hit-and-miss primitive
techniques. It can't be outlawed effectively because technology can't be
controlled by a clunky and outmoded legal system. Technology makes it's own
rules. The only way to deal with it is by a) persuasion. b) destroy the
society which uses it c) economic factors beyond effective control of
individuals and groups which change the cost.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
30 Jan 2005 02:15:52 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:40:02 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
said in alt.atheism:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:0aamv0h6i8sd8kue8rfsj0n25jagobd9pf@4ax.com...
Technology? Human women have been aborting pregnancies for 35,000
years that we know of.
Now abortion is a technology because modern medicine is technological.
Abortion can still be effected by wire hanger, or even by IUD. Very
low tech.
that's the kind of thing trying to nbe outlawed because it is much safer and
more effective than outright infanticide or hit-and-miss primitive
techniques.
Ergotrate isn't "hit and miss", if administered by someone who can
calculate dosages.
--
"The study of geology is ok-But not when it contradicts what is laid
out in the Bible that the earth is more than 10,000 years old."
- Doug Lee, Creationist
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
31 Jan 2005 02:20:34 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:5ngov0p608qnq9eh64v835pc4r6on1v2n8@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:40:02 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
said in alt.atheism:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:0aamv0h6i8sd8kue8rfsj0n25jagobd9pf@4ax.com...
Technology? Human women have been aborting pregnancies for 35,000
years that we know of.
Now abortion is a technology because modern medicine is technological.
Abortion can still be effected by wire hanger, or even by IUD. Very
low tech.
that's the kind of thing trying to nbe outlawed because it is much safer
and
more effective than outright infanticide or hit-and-miss primitive
techniques.
Ergotrate isn't "hit and miss", if administered by someone who can
calculate dosages.
They are trying to outlaw medical technology. Technology can't be controlled
by laws. The other methods you mentioned are not central to being outlawed
because they are not in common practice and are not used by doctors for good
reasons.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
30 Jan 2005 03:27:30 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 06:13:14 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
paying lip-service to prohibitionism. Probably nothing. Leaving aside
whether a technology can successfully be prohibited, how are you actually
working to reduce abortions?
Technology? Human women have been aborting pregnancies for 35,000
years that we know of.
How profound - human women.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
30 Jan 2005 03:26:37 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 01:52:54 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote:
I work to save the unborn, you work to murder the unborn. You will stand
before god to answer for that.
Aside from claiming that it's only a coincidence that the long downtrend in
abortion is now reversed, and that per-capita aboritons are often higher in
red states than blue states, leaving that aside, you still haven't said what
you are doing to prevent abortion.
The end to the madness is getting close.
Moreover, if you are against abortion for religious reasons, how can telling
atheists that, help to decrease the number of abortions?
You will judged for it, not me.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
31 Jan 2005 02:20:35 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d1vpv0t19idgoam3uo09350g03ao829qt1@4ax.com...
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 01:52:54 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
wrote:
I work to save the unborn, you work to murder the unborn. You will
stand
before god to answer for that.
Aside from claiming that it's only a coincidence that the long downtrend
in
abortion is now reversed, and that per-capita aboritons are often higher
in
red states than blue states, leaving that aside, you still haven't said
what
you are doing to prevent abortion.
The end to the madness is getting close.
Moreover, if you are against abortion for religious reasons, how can
telling
atheists that, help to decrease the number of abortions?
You will judged for it, not me.
That's not answering the questions. Plus, aren't you violating the
commandments of your own religion by saying that I will be judged? In fact
you are already judged when you say someone else is judged. What did Jesus
say about the beam and the mote?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
03 Feb 2005 12:22:28 PM |
|
|
PUKE wrote:
The end to the madness is getting close.
You mean you're going to quit posting lies and hypocrisy in ngs? We
can only hope.
You will judged for it, not me.
Here is Duck *****, who lies that he doesn't judge, judging. Chalk
another up to the list of examples of his hypocrisy and one more to the
list of his lies.
Now when are you going to respond to Lisbeth Andersson's comments of
Jan 30th regarding Catholics and abortion? Or do we chalk another one
up to the list of examples of your cowardice?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
29 Jan 2005 06:11:00 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:06:55 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
said in alt.atheism:
Are you going to outlaw coathangers too?
Wire hangers. (You can't perform an abortion with a coat hanger.)
(Does that say something about my age?)
--
"I don't try to imagine a God; it suffices to stand in awe of the structure of the world
insofar as it allows our inadequate senses to appreciate it."
- Letter to S. Flesch, April 16, 1954; Einstein Archive 30-1154
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
28 Jan 2005 07:35:58 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:06:55 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well, dummy, it's like any murder case. It takes evidence of purpose.
The question was how you obtained that evidence, you stupid piece of
*****.
Well, well, lookie here who's starting to wake up.
Going to an abortionist that is no longer there because he's now in jail for
manslaughter gets more interesting.
It's obvious that you will need fucking evidence to attempt to
prosecute someone for murder, dumbass. So, is the plan to inspect every
woman's uterus on a monthly basis?
I know this is over your head, quib, but inadvertent loss of a fetus is not a
crime.
Do you think you'll always be able
to tell if a miscarriage was intentional or not? Are you going to
outlaw coathangers too?
It's unbelievable how totally lost you are in this conversation.
No fucking kidding. You're a complete ignoramus on matters of the law
and just about everything else.
Could be, except for me having you figured out.
The problem is that your ignorant *****
has been sounding off about matters of the law, which you now admit that
you don't know jack ***** about.
Yet I DO know more than you do.
I don't think it is a capital offense subject to the death
penalty.
You nicely demonstrated that you don't have a fucking clue with that
little serving of word salad.
hehehehehe. Boy, are you dumb.
So whether it's manslaughter or murder 2 is best left to the courts to
decide.
Then you should have, but you fucked up and already make that judgment,
It was just a minimum suggestion. Not that you know what that is.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
01 Feb 2005 08:26:07 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
Well, well, lookie here who's starting to wake up.
Talking of which, I count **TEN** (10) messages from me in response to
yours (not counting this one) **IN THIS THREAD ALONE** and from which
you've run away. At least one of these is a response to your question
asking why I ran away from your challenge to a discussion. Not only is
that a lie, this thread alone is proof positive that it is **YOU** who
consistently runs away from discussion. Duck ***** will out.
I know this is over your head, quib, but inadvertent
loss of a fetus is not a crime.
How about ripping babies from the womb, Duck *****?
"Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God:
they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces,
and their women with child shall be ripped up." (Hos 13:16)
How about sacrificing children, Duck *****? Don't lie that the Bible
doesn't demand that.
How about "Woe to them that give suck" (Mat 24:19), Duck *****? Or do
you interpret that as fellatio? (no, Duck *****, Fellatio isn't a
character in a Shakepeare play).
Yet I DO know more than you do.
You know less than the average adolescent, and you prove it every time
you open your stupid mouth.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: 46,106,000 now dead from............. |
24 Jan 2005 01:04:57 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:22:01 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> drained
his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
Working to overturn Roe v Wade, and make abortion at least man slaughter with
mandatory jail time for the health official doing them.
Notice how Earl blames only the health care provider here...
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: It's 50 million a YEAR, dumbass! |
23 Jan 2005 06:42:14 PM |
|
|
In article <o0b7v01q9kiauhfscrm489cci96fj7r18n@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
........the inhuman act of elective abortion at the hands of the butcher.
Duke you stupid *****, you have no fucking clue. There are
estimated to be around 50 million abortions worldwide every year.
That's half a billion in a decade. Go cry a river about that, you
silly little *****. If your god cares so much about it then why has he
done nothing to prevent it? Even if the US banned it outright, which
will never happen, it wouldn't make a dent in the worldwide rate.
If it's so terrible then why doesn't your god do one fucking thing about
it? The majority of zygotes (that's fertilized ova for chuckleheads
like you) don't even implant. Get over it. Zygotes and first term
fetuses are nowhere near being fully formed human beings. A work in
progress is not the same thing as the finished product. Around 1 in 5
pregnancies end in abortion. That's just the way it is and you can't do
***** about it. If it were any other subject you'd say that the "free
market" had spoken. Just admit that you hate freedom, particularly
female reproductive freedom. You're just a pregnazi who wants to see
women made slaves to maternity again. It ain't gonna happen, so FOAD
you misogynist piece of *****.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: It's 50 million a YEAR, dumbass! |
23 Jan 2005 10:45:49 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:42:14 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
said in alt.atheism:
Around 1 in 5 pregnancies end in abortion.
That's 1 in 5 KNOWN pregnancies. How many end before implantation?
It's been estimated that most (like 70%-95%) do.
--
"Does it ever amaze anyone else how little faith some heterosexuals have
in heterosexuality? It's supposed to be this god-given human instinct
that only the warped and perverted ever stray from; but, it seems, if we
once tell our straight children a message even as mild as "some people
are gay, and that's all right," that'll be enough to send lil' Suzy into
the arms of women forever. It's a wonder the race has survived this
long, really..."
- Charles M Seaton (21 Dec 1994)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: It's 50 million a YEAR, dumbass! |
24 Jan 2005 11:26:49 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:45:49 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:42:14 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
said in alt.atheism:
Around 1 in 5 pregnancies end in abortion.
That's 1 in 5 KNOWN pregnancies. How many end before implantation?
It's been estimated that most (like 70%-95%) do.
Ok, everyone, now this is a typical alklein comment.
One alklein to another alklein standing at a cemetery asks: How many dead people
are in that cemetery.
Alklein replied: Let me go count.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: It's 50 million a YEAR, dumbass! |
30 Jan 2005 06:47:36 AM |
|
|
PUKE wrote:
That's 1 in 5 KNOWN pregnancies. How many end before implantation?
It's been estimated that most (like 70%-95%) do.
Ok, everyone, now this is a typical alklein comment.
No it's a typical Duck ***** lie. You haven't supported a single thing
you've said in this thread, so all of it is lies, based on your past
performance, until and unless you offer some **EVIDENCE** to support
your psychotic claims.
(hint: evidence doesn't consist of making ridiculous and/or unsupported
assertions, nor is it an idiotic list of your blind beliefs).
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: It's 50 million a YEAR, dumbass! |
30 Jan 2005 02:50:22 PM |
|
|
On 29 Jan 2005 22:47:36 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
That's 1 in 5 KNOWN pregnancies. How many end before implantation?
It's been estimated that most (like 70%-95%) do.
Ok, everyone, now this is a typical alklein comment.
No it's a typical Duck ***** lie. You haven't supported a single thing
you've said in this thread
I never lie on the ng, bud.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
SATURDAY: 8 GIS, 80 IRAQIS KILLED; 106 INJURED
Psalm 106: 1-5. 7-6-2007.
WEDNESDAY: 106 IRAQIS, 2 GIS KILLED; 116 IRAQIS, 1 GI, 3 BRITONSINJURED
US consumer confidence surges to 106.1 in July (a 2 year high!!!) (Good for America-Bad for Liberal DummyRATs)!!!!!!
Re: SBS/Miami Launches Regional Mexican ''La Raza 106.3''
Psalm 106: 34-37, 39-40, 43-44. 8-20-2007.
Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder. ==> US consumer confidence surges to 106.1 in July (a 2 year high!!!) (Good for America-Bad for Liberal DummyRATs)
Psalm 106: 1-5. 6-28-2007.
| OH LOST 11,000 Jobs in August. Thank You AWOL! (We Turned The Corner! Now Watch This Drive)
Gawd's "Slaugher of the Innocents" now stands at 114,000
JCSM - 100,000 Pages! Now Includes The New Advent Transcrption of the Catholic Encyclopedia?!
UT LOST 2,000 Jobs In July! Than You Bush! (We Soooooo Turned the Corner. Now Watch This Drive!)
OH LOST 22,000 Jobs in August. Thank You AWOL! (We Turned The Corner! Now Watch This Drive)
NC LOST 5,000 Jobs in August. Thank You AWOL! (We Turned The Corner! Now Watch This Drive)
ok, friends now...
|
|
|
