5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei



 Religions > Atheism > 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Lin Liangtai"
Date: 26 Oct 2007 09:57:42 AM
Object: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
High resolution SEM microscopies clearly show concave and anucleate
red blood cells of Jurassic dinosaurs. So, dinosaurs were certainly
mammals.
See "5,000X, negative-effect" SEM photos at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=12
Meanwhile, please be informed that I did an EDS analysis before
taking
SEM photos. The EDS report states that the specimen contains 53% (by
weight) of Fe, 33% of Silica, 9% of Aluminium.
Those chemical composition does not indicate an iron stone or any rock.
.

User: "Ye Old One"

Title: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei 26 Oct 2007 10:36:37 AM
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:57:42 -0700, Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:

High resolution SEM microscopies clearly show concave and anucleate
red blood cells of Jurassic dinosaurs. So, dinosaurs were certainly
mammals.

Your photos are rubbish.
You don't know what you are talking about.
End of story.


See "5,000X, negative-effect" SEM photos at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=12


Meanwhile, please be informed that I did an EDS analysis before
taking
SEM photos. The EDS report states that the specimen contains 53% (by
weight) of Fe, 33% of Silica, 9% of Aluminium.
Those chemical composition does not indicate an iron stone or any rock.

What does it indicate to you then moron?
--
Bob.
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei 26 Oct 2007 12:27:58 PM
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:57:42 -0700, Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:

Meanwhile, please be informed that I did an EDS analysis before
taking
SEM photos. The EDS report states that the specimen contains 53% (by
weight) of Fe, 33% of Silica, 9% of Aluminium.
Those chemical composition does not indicate an iron stone or any rock.

It sure doesn't indicate something organic.
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"The doctrine that the earth is neither the center of the universe nor immovable, but
moves even with a daily rotation, is absurd, and both philosophically and theologically
false, and at the least an error of faith."
- Catholic Church's decision against Galileo Galilei
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Bible Says Only Organisms With Red Blood Are Alive!
OT: Blood Runs Red, Not Blue
OT: Byrd: "Bush's War is Turning the Sands of Iraq Blood Red"
Re: Blood Red Moon Rising and the Wrath of the Lamb: Who can stand?
Re: Blood Red Moon Rising and the Wrath of the Lamb: Who can stand?
Re: Blood Red Moon Rising and the Wrath of the Lamb: Who can stand?
Blood Money
Miracle claimed as village's statue of saint oozes blood
Re: [FICTION] Blood of Heroes, Part I
Cheney's HalLIEburton Did Business With Saddam During the 90's (Oil Is Obviously Thicker Than Blood)
Pundits have blood feast on shrubco
OT: Blood and soil
OT: Sicilians Are Making a Blood-Soaked Desert Bloom
=?Windows-1252?Q?=22Only_in_Atheism_does_the_spring_rise_higher_than_the_?==?Windows-1252?Q?source=2C_the_effect_exist_without_the_cause=2C_life_com?==?Windows-1252?Q?e_from_a_stone=2C_blood_from_a_turnip=2C_a_silk_purse_fr?==?Windows-1252?Q?om_a_sow
OT: A history of blood and deception
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER