Religions > Atheism > 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"JOE" |
| Date: |
12 Jan 2005 01:22:43 PM |
| Object: |
6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
THE PRESIDENT IS BELOVED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
January 12, 2005
Inauguration to Get Unprecedented Security
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
In describing the plans for the Jan. 20 event, Department of Homeland
Security Secretary Tom Ridge said that while the decibel level was
negligible on terrorism chatter, the 55th quadrennial presidential
inauguration was such a high-profile event that security would be at
its highest level.
``This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy,'' Ridge
said at a news conference near the Capitol, where Bush will take the
oath on the West Front.
``Security will be at the highest levels of any inauguration,'' Ridge
said.
The Federal Aviation Administration has announced that it will expand
the no-fly zone, now a 15- 3/4-mile radius around the Washington
Monument, to a 23-mile radius around Reagan National, Dulles and
Baltimore-Washington International airports. The temporary flight
restrictions will be in effect from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Jan. 20.
Roughly 2,500 military personnel will also be on hand to bolster
security, with another 4,700 involved in ceremonial duties, said Maj.
Gen. Galen Jackman, who commands the Army's military district of
Washington.
On Tuesday, he sought to play down the terror warnings issued last
year. ``There is no threat directed toward the inaugural or inaugural
activities,'' he said......
^------
.
|
|
| User: "Vet.." |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
15 Jan 2005 10:39:26 AM |
|
|
In article <u6uau0ttdgnl1b79nsa9g3ndlii6scb6r4@4ax.com>,
JOE <JOE@ARGGH.NET> wrote:
THE PRESIDENT IS BELOVED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
January 12, 2005
Inauguration to Get Unprecedented Security
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
In describing the plans for the Jan. 20 event, Department of Homeland
Security Secretary Tom Ridge said that while the decibel level was
negligible on terrorism chatter, the 55th quadrennial presidential
inauguration was such a high-profile event that security would be at
its highest level.
``This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy,'' Ridge
said at a news conference near the Capitol, where Bush will take the
oath on the West Front.
``Security will be at the highest levels of any inauguration,'' Ridge
said.
The Federal Aviation Administration has announced that it will expand
the no-fly zone, now a 15- 3/4-mile radius around the Washington
Monument, to a 23-mile radius around Reagan National, Dulles and
Baltimore-Washington International airports. The temporary flight
restrictions will be in effect from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Jan. 20.
Roughly 2,500 military personnel will also be on hand to bolster
security, with another 4,700 involved in ceremonial duties, said Maj.
Gen. Galen Jackman, who commands the Army's military district of
Washington.
On Tuesday, he sought to play down the terror warnings issued last
year. ``There is no threat directed toward the inaugural or inaugural
activities,'' he said......
^------
but, he is very paranoid. I would be too , if i was him.
<g.
you can't fool all of the people , all of the time.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 03:44:05 AM |
|
|
JOE wrote:
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
It amuses me that people make a big deal over this. It's the first
inauguration since 9-11. It represents the very core of the American
system of government. If planned security was anything less than
"unprecedented" then somebody is NOT doing their job....
.
|
|
|
| User: "T_Hull" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 07:43:30 AM |
|
|
In article <1105609445.561374.74050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
"Joe" <obri6133@aol.com> wrote:
JOE wrote:
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
It amuses me that people make a big deal over this. It's the first
inauguration since 9-11. It represents the very core of the American
system of government. If planned security was anything less than
"unprecedented" then somebody is NOT doing their job....
When has bush ever done his job?
--
______________________
remove 'XXX" to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 02:25:43 PM |
|
|
Joe wrote:
< snip >
It amuses me that people make a big deal over this. It's the first
inauguration since 9-11. It represents the very core of the American
system of government.
Throwing lavish parties for bigwigs is the core of our system of government?
Okay, I can't argue with that.
< snip >
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 11:26:43 AM |
|
|
On 13 Jan 2005 01:44:05 -0800, "Joe" <obri6133@aol.com> wrote:
JOE wrote:
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
It amuses me that people make a big deal over this. It's the first
inauguration since 9-11. It represents the very core of the American
system of government. If planned security was anything less than
"unprecedented" then somebody is NOT doing their job....
By your rationalle, 6,000 is not enough. There should be representation from
across the country from every law enforcement department. This number should
be 50x larger.
*sigh*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 07:27:27 PM |
|
|
Mark wrote:
By your rationalle, 6,000 is not enough. There should be
representation from
across the country from every law enforcement department. This
number should
be 50x larger.
*sigh*
I never said 6,000 was not enough. I think it's adequate. Of course,
that's assumin' that the commoners behave and the King don't have to
call for his archers...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JustMe" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
14 Jan 2005 11:01:21 PM |
|
|
Someone please explain the big deal why all the liberal are whining
about the money spent on the inauguration. Isn'y pumping money into
the local economy a good thing??
On 13 Jan 2005 01:44:05 -0800, "Joe" <obri6133@aol.com> wrote:
JOE wrote:
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
It amuses me that people make a big deal over this. It's the first
inauguration since 9-11. It represents the very core of the American
system of government. If planned security was anything less than
"unprecedented" then somebody is NOT doing their job....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
14 Jan 2005 11:52:11 PM |
|
|
JustMe <JustMe@MyISP.net> wrote in
news:tp8hu09l8k5bah420jkbetb74hbsa2sms7@4ax.com:
On 13 Jan 2005 01:44:05 -0800, "Joe" <obri6133@aol.com> wrote:
JOE wrote:
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
It amuses me that people make a big deal over this. It's the first
inauguration since 9-11. It represents the very core of the American
system of government. If planned security was anything less than
"unprecedented" then somebody is NOT doing their job....
Someone please explain the big deal why all the liberal are whining
about the money spent on the inauguration. Isn'y pumping money into
the local economy a good thing??
Who's whining? It should be a federal expence, not a D.C. municipal
expense. D.C. can't and shouldn't have to pay for this.
--
Enkidu AA# 2165
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then where does evil come from?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
Epicurus 341-270 B.C.E.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "angelagrace" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
15 Jan 2005 12:40:25 AM |
|
|
JustMe wrote:
Someone please explain the big deal why all the liberal are whining
about the money spent on the inauguration. Isn'y pumping money into
the local economy a good thing??
I guess one person's whining is another's noticing that which should be
noticed by thinking people.
One thing that should be noticed - who exactly is 'donating' to pay for
the coronation. Bush's Base, that's who, and here's a handy list of them
and how much they've promised to ante up:
http://www.inaugural05.com/donors/
The list is handy because it's a good heads-up as far as those who will
be screwing over We the People for the rest of W's reign. They're
basically buying favors that fall outside of scope of campaign finance
reform.
Another thing that should be noticed - the standard excuse for all the
security We the People are paying for is 9/11. 9/11 has become like a
monk's habit for the GOP - it covers a multitude of sins. The real
reason for all the security is not so much actual threats over and above
the norm for such an event, it's rather the glaring fact of W being the
most unpopular president in modern history, possibly of all history.
Worldwide and nationwide. Most of us don't want him as president, and so
the unprecedented protests, and hence the unprecedented security.
Angela
--
This is the worst president ever.
He is the worst president in all of American history.
Helen Thomas
Regime Change Begins At Home
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
15 Jan 2005 12:07:07 PM |
|
|
angelagrace wrote:
JustMe wrote:
Most of us don't want him as president, and so
the unprecedented protests, and hence the unprecedented security.
Angela
Actually, most of us do want him as President. Look to the recent
Presidential election for verification of that desire...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
17 Jan 2005 11:00:40 AM |
|
|
Joe wrote:
angelagrace wrote:
JustMe wrote:
Most of us don't want him as president, and so
the unprecedented protests, and hence the unprecedented security.
Angela
Actually, most of us do want him as President. Look to the recent
Presidential election for verification of that desire...
I'm assuming that by "us", Angela meant "rational people".
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 07:06:38 AM |
|
|
JOE wrote:
THE PRESIDENT IS BELOVED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
January 12, 2005
Inauguration to Get Unprecedented Security
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
Shrub may have gotten away with censoring free speech
at Ohio State University were - the "Turn your back
on Bush" movement - but this time, Shrub can't do
anything to them.
If anyone is going (or hadn't planned to) feel free
to join in an act of free speech:
http://www.turnyourbackonbush.com/
On Tuesday, he sought to play down the terror warnings issued last
year. ``There is no threat directed toward the inaugural or inaugural
activities,'' he said......
The threat is being inaugurated.
Bob Dog
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill1255" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 12:25:32 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Shrub may have gotten away with censoring free speech
at Ohio State University were - the "Turn your back
on Bush" movement - but this time, Shrub can't do
anything to them.
You don't think so? 3,000 of those 6,000 goons will be doing nothing
but keeping dissidents out of the crowd. And along the parade route,
the sidewalks will all be segmented and roped off and every single
person will be screened.
God save the King.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
15 Jan 2005 12:26:49 PM |
|
|
Bill1255 wrote:
You don't think so? 3,000 of those 6,000 goons will be doing nothing
but keeping dissidents out of the crowd. And along the parade route,
the sidewalks will all be segmented and roped off and every single
person will be screened.
God save the King.
The "goons" have the same job at every Presidential appearance. Clinton
spoke at LaSalle College in Philly in 1997. We spent the entire morning
assisting the secret service in screening every single person standing
outside the venue.....gun scans, personal interviews and pat downs. The
area was roped off and no one else was permitted entry. Those who did
not want to consent to the security measures were free to leave. All
visible dissidents were sent to the roped off protest areas. Let's not
blame Bush for Presidential security measures. They were exactly the
same for President Clinton.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
22 Jan 2005 06:03:48 AM |
|
|
Bill1255 wrote:
bg12345@apexmail.com wrote:
Shrub may have gotten away with censoring free speech
at Ohio State University were - the "Turn your back
on Bush" movement - but this time, Shrub can't do
anything to them.
You don't think so? 3,000 of those 6,000 goons will be doing nothing
but keeping dissidents out of the crowd. And along the parade route,
the sidewalks will all be segmented and roped off and every single
person will be screened.
God save the King.
I was referring to the theft of Bachelor's Degrees
by the university, something that was not at issue
on Thursday. Of course the repeat of New York's
Little Guantanamo was possible, that wasn't what
I was discussing.
http://www.uexpress.com/tedrall/?uc_full_date=20040914
Surprisingly, Chicken Noodle News showed pictures
of the TYBOB people. Dark shirts, backs to the
Elmo, and carrying signs marked "LIAR". Beautiful.
Bob Dog
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vet.." |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 05:58:40 PM |
|
|
In article <1105621598.254773.277640@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
http://www.turnyourbackonbush.com/
yes, he turned his back on our freedoms, and the Thou Shall not Kill
commandment.
<g.
you can't fool all of the people , all of the time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vet.." |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
14 Jan 2005 09:16:20 AM |
|
|
In article <georgew.k-6E7D6F.15584013012005@corp.supernews.com>,
"Vet.." <georgew.k@humboldt1.com> wrote:
In article <1105621598.254773.277640@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
bg12345@apexmail.com wrote:
http://www.turnyourbackonbush.com/
yes, he turned his back on our freedoms, and the Thou Shall not Kill
commandment.
<g.
you can't fool all of the people , all of the time.
and the Cost ?
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&u=/ap/20050114/ap_on_go_pr_
wh/inaugural_price_tag_3&printer=1
<g.
you can't fool all of the people , all of the time.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
12 Jan 2005 10:09:36 PM |
|
|
On 12 Jan 2005, JOE dropped trou, farted, whirled, then shouted:
THE PRESIDENT IS BELOVED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
And so is overkill.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
--------
Why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are people you
wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?
--George Carlin
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "lab~rat" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
12 Jan 2005 01:27:10 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:22:43 -0600, JOE <JOE@ARGGH.NET> puked:
THE PRESIDENT IS BELOVED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
January 12, 2005
Inauguration to Get Unprecedented Security
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
In describing the plans for the Jan. 20 event, Department of Homeland
Security Secretary Tom Ridge said that while the decibel level was
negligible on terrorism chatter, the 55th quadrennial presidential
inauguration was such a high-profile event that security would be at
its highest level.
``This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy,'' Ridge
said at a news conference near the Capitol, where Bush will take the
oath on the West Front.
``Security will be at the highest levels of any inauguration,'' Ridge
said.
The Federal Aviation Administration has announced that it will expand
the no-fly zone, now a 15- 3/4-mile radius around the Washington
Monument, to a 23-mile radius around Reagan National, Dulles and
Baltimore-Washington International airports. The temporary flight
restrictions will be in effect from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Jan. 20.
Roughly 2,500 military personnel will also be on hand to bolster
security, with another 4,700 involved in ceremonial duties, said Maj.
Gen. Galen Jackman, who commands the Army's military district of
Washington.
On Tuesday, he sought to play down the terror warnings issued last
year. ``There is no threat directed toward the inaugural or inaugural
activities,'' he said......
^------
I don't think this is a response to terrorism. I think it's a
response to reading loony "liberal" rantings in newsgroups...
--
lab~rat >:-)
The less you care, the more it doesn't matter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cosmic Dawg, Legally Blond" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
13 Jan 2005 06:10:29 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:27:10 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:22:43 -0600, JOE <JOE@ARGGH.NET> puked:
THE PRESIDENT IS BELOVED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
January 12, 2005
Inauguration to Get Unprecedented Security
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration will be
unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb
teams and close monitoring of transportation.
In describing the plans for the Jan. 20 event, Department of Homeland
Security Secretary Tom Ridge said that while the decibel level was
negligible on terrorism chatter, the 55th quadrennial presidential
inauguration was such a high-profile event that security would be at
its highest level.
``This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy,'' Ridge
said at a news conference near the Capitol, where Bush will take the
oath on the West Front.
``Security will be at the highest levels of any inauguration,'' Ridge
said.
The Federal Aviation Administration has announced that it will expand
the no-fly zone, now a 15- 3/4-mile radius around the Washington
Monument, to a 23-mile radius around Reagan National, Dulles and
Baltimore-Washington International airports. The temporary flight
restrictions will be in effect from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Jan. 20.
Roughly 2,500 military personnel will also be on hand to bolster
security, with another 4,700 involved in ceremonial duties, said Maj.
Gen. Galen Jackman, who commands the Army's military district of
Washington.
On Tuesday, he sought to play down the terror warnings issued last
year. ``There is no threat directed toward the inaugural or inaugural
activities,'' he said......
^------
I don't think this is a response to terrorism. I think it's a
response to reading loony "liberal" rantings in newsgroups...
I think It's a reflection of just how "Loved" he is by Americans.
--
When people speak to you about a preventive war, you
tell them to go and fight it. After my experience,
I have come to hate war. War settles nothing.
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
.
|
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: 6,000 law enforcement personnel to guard Bush at inauguration |
14 Jan 2005 01:14:22 AM |
|
|
BINGO!!
I think It's a reflection of just how "Loved" he is by Americans.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
