Religions > Atheism > 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent'
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Useful Info" |
| Date: |
16 May 2007 09:59:57 AM |
| Object: |
800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
But not the Koran?
Read all about it, here: http://Muvy.org
.
|
|
| User: "P.Henery" |
|
| Title: Re: 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
16 May 2007 10:07:11 AM |
|
|
On 16 May 2007 07:59:57 -0700, Useful Info wrote:
But not the Koran?
So?
Read all about it, here: http://Muvy.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "GodFearing" |
|
| Title: Re: 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
16 May 2007 11:05:20 AM |
|
|
On May 16, 11:07 am, "P.Henery" <P.Hen...@revolution.org> wrote:
On 16 May 2007 07:59:57 -0700, Useful Info wrote:
But not the Koran?
So?
Read all about it, here:http://Muvy.org- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
16 May 2007 10:54:07 AM |
|
|
P.Henery wrote:
On 16 May 2007 07:59:57 -0700, Useful Info wrote:
But not the Koran?
So?
When someone's Usenet name is "Useful Info", you can assume that he hasn't
any.
.
|
|
|
| User: "neo" |
|
| Title: Re: 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
16 May 2007 11:08:46 AM |
|
|
Geoff wrote:
P.Henery wrote:
On 16 May 2007 07:59:57 -0700, Useful Info wrote:
But not the Koran?
So?
When someone's Usenet name is "Useful Info", you can assume that he hasn't
any.
And when someone's Usenet name is "Useless Info", you can assume that
he is enlightened.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
16 May 2007 02:06:14 PM |
|
|
neo wrote:
Geoff wrote:
P.Henery wrote:
On 16 May 2007 07:59:57 -0700, Useful Info wrote:
But not the Koran?
So?
When someone's Usenet name is "Useful Info", you can assume that he
hasn't any.
And when someone's Usenet name is "Useless Info", you can assume that
he is enlightened.
Nice logic! Ever hear of Venn diagrams?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
20 May 2007 09:47:31 AM |
|
|
Geoff wrote:
neo wrote:
Geoff wrote:
P.Henery wrote:
On 16 May 2007 07:59:57 -0700, Useful Info wrote:
But not the Koran?
So?
When someone's Usenet name is "Useful Info", you can assume that he
hasn't any.
And when someone's Usenet name is "Useless Info", you can assume that
he is enlightened.
Nice logic! Ever hear of Venn diagrams?
I guess not.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "GodFearing" |
|
| Title: Re: 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
16 May 2007 11:05:08 AM |
|
|
On May 16, 10:59 am, Useful Info <useful_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
But not the Koran?
Read all about it, here:http://Muvy.org
Why did you link to muvy.org when a reputable link is easy to find?
http://uk.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUKHKG26218320070516
------------------------------------------------
http://www.cafepress.com/bush_doggers?pid=2794571
.
|
|
|
| User: "Conspiracy of Doves" |
|
| Title: Re: 800+ Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as 'indecent' |
16 May 2007 04:41:17 PM |
|
|
On May 16, 12:05 pm, GodFearing <defendu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 16, 10:59 am, Useful Info <useful_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
But not the Koran?
Read all about it, here:http://Muvy.org
Why did you link to muvy.org when a reputable link is easy to find?
http://uk.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUKHKG26218320070516
------------------------------------------------http://www.cafepress.com/bush_doggers?pid=2794571
Because he probably runs muvy and he's trying to shill his site
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|