Religions > Atheism > __ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles ! __
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"¥ UltraMan ¥" |
| Date: |
11 Aug 2007 06:49:21 PM |
| Object: |
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles ! __ |
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering U$ economy
.... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
Immigration rules will hurt economy
Crackdown on employers could cause havoc in agriculture, healthcare and other
industries, Chertoff acknowledges.
By Nicole Gaouette
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 11, 2007
WASHINGTON - Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff predicted painful
economic fallout from the array of immigration enforcement measures the
administration unveiled Friday in an attempt to choke off the jobs "magnet" that
draws illegal immigrants.
The changes, which would stiffen work-site enforcement, add border agents and
increase penalties for rogue employers, could cause havoc in immigrant-dependent
industries like agriculture, hospitality and healthcare, Chertoff acknowledged.
"There will be some unhappy consequences for the economy out of doing this," he
said in an interview with The Times.
Chertoff said he had little sympathy for businesses that hire illegal workers,
saying they should have seen the crackdown coming after the Senate failed to
pass immigration reform. "We have been crystal clear about what the consequences
would be," he said.
The announcement of the multi-agency initiative -- made by Chertoff and Commerce
Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez -- was the Bush administration's first extensive
explanation of how it plans to ramp up the fight against illegal immigration. In
a statement, President Bush called the measures "important" and promised "to
take every possible step" to strengthen the nation's "broken immigration
system."
The enforcement approach is aimed partly at placating conservative Republicans
who are angry about the administration's failure to enforce existing immigration
laws and the president's support for a plan that would have allowed illegal
immigrants to become citizens.
But it also could create a political climate that might lead to the
comprehensive changes the administration has sought, including a guest worker
program and some accommodation for the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants
in the United States. Chertoff said the provisions, some of which take effect in
30 days, could push corporate America to apply more pressure on Congress to
reconsider broad reforms.
"I'm not a lawmaker, but I presume, at some point, somebody's going to take a
look and say, 'We've got to find a way to address this problem,' and that's
probably going to require some legal changes," he said. But he stressed that
"this is not an effort to punish Congress."
Gutierrez framed the issue more starkly: "We do not have the workers our economy
needs to keep growing each year. The demographics simply are not on our side.
Ultimately, Congress will have to pass comprehensive immigration reform."
Business groups, unions, immigrant advocates and religious organizations
protested the provisions. But longtime opponents of comprehensive reform greeted
the news happily.
"This is exactly what the American people were saying. . . when they said, 'Why
don't we start out by enforcing existing laws and prove that Washington will do
the right thing?' " said Rep. Brian P. Bilbray (R-Solano Beach). "Once we
reinstate confidence in the government, then we can come back and talk about the
other stuff."
Bilbray compared ending the nation's economic dependency on illegal immigration
to weaning an addict off drugs. "If there's some pain, it's not because we
didn't have amnesty. It's because we didn't enforce the law 20 years ago when we
should have," he said.
Others expressed skepticism about the Department of Homeland Security's ability
to enforce the measures, pointing out that the department cannot even come up
with the number of high-skilled visa-holders in the country. "The agency that
can't count is now going to go on this enforcement gig," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren
(D-San Jose), chairwoman of the House immigration subcommittee. "We'll see how
they do."
Business groups predicted the effect would be broadly felt.
"It's going to be awful; the harvest is going to be awful," said Laura Foote
Reiff, co-chairwoman of the Business Immigration Group, predicting the effect on
agriculture, where more than half of the 2.5 million workers are believed to be
illegal. "People will feel it when they go grocery shopping, when they read in
the newspaper that we're importing our meat from China."
Many of the measures the administration highlighted Friday are already underway,
including a dramatic increase in criminal prosecutions of employers with illegal
workers. Immigration officials have made 742 such arrests in the first 10 months
of this fiscal year.
Some measures are in the early planning stages. A couple are a few months from
launching, including a requirement that federal contractors use E-Verify, an
electronic system to confirm that their employees are legal.
Others had been under consideration for some time, including a move to force
businesses to fire workers with discrepancies in their Social Security data or
face civil fines. Because many illegal immigrants work under fake Social
Security numbers or use those of citizens, it is considered a relatively easy
way to identify them. But the regulation taking effect in 30 days has companies
intensely concerned, in part because the error rate in Social Security data for
U.S. citizens has been estimated as high as 11%.
"We're giving employers a clear choice," Chertoff said. "If you take the steps
we lay out, you'll have a safe harbor. If you don't, you're putting yourself at
risk."
He characterized the effect of the Social Security rule on most businesses as a
"thunderstorm."
"There will only be a tsunami if I have a business where I have 80% of my
employees I fear are illegal," Chertoff said. "If I'm basically confident my
workforce is legal, it's going to be a little thunderstorm. But for some it will
expose patterns and practices that may be illegal."
Chertoff brushed aside concerns that the rule could drive businesses to hire
employees off the books. "An employer who does that is making a deliberate
decision to compound their legal difficulties by committing tax crimes as well
as immigration crimes," he said.
Administration officials began meeting to discuss these steps in June,
immediately after the Senate failed to overhaul the nation's immigration laws.
The White House presided over sessions that included the Departments of State,
Labor, Commerce, Homeland Security and Education. Officials from Treasury and
the Social Security Administration also took part.
Chertoff said the administration held off on implementing these measures in the
hope that a legislative overhaul would provide a tougher arsenal. "We looked at
these programs late last year, early this year, and we thought, 'You know, this
is kind of a half-measure. Wouldn't it be better to get the full measure and the
sharpest, newest tools if Congress passes them and gives it to us?' " he said.
While some of the new measures would add to the Department of Homeland
Security's enforcement personnel, Chertoff said that it would not have the
agents to track down every employer who breaks the law. Instead, he argued that
high-impact, high-visibility enforcement would act as a deterrent.
Chertoff suggested that once the provisions had been in force for a while,
Congress would see immigration reform in a different light.
"Everybody who criticized comprehensive immigration reform for being too
complex, maybe now they're going to realize it's complex because there are a lot
of interconnected pieces to this and when you try to deal with only one corner
of it, you wind up with a huge impact on something else," he said.
"I would still like to believe Congress is capable of doing big things and not
just producing bumper-sticker solutions to problems. I haven't given up yet."
.
|
|
| User: "Kent Wills" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles ! __ |
14 Aug 2007 11:34:31 PM |
|
|
As I understand it, on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:49:21 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥"
<ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering U$ economy
... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- jonez/vox/ultra/whatever
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- jonez/vox/ultra/whatever
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- jonez/vox/ultra/whatever
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- jonez/vox/ultra/whatever
--
Kent
Recuerdo del Fin Del Mundo!
.
|
|
|
| User: "tjab" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles ! __ |
16 Aug 2007 05:38:31 PM |
|
|
In article <bi05c39v9h88pinaaankcphmj39u7bscnh@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
As I understand it, on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:49:21 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥"
<ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering U$ economy
... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- jonez/vox/ultra/whatever
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- jonez/vox/ultra/whatever
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- jonez/vox/ultra/whatever
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- jonez/vox/ultra/whatever
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
.
|
|
|
| User: "_ Prof. Jonez _" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
19 Aug 2007 03:57:16 PM |
|
|
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary ...
Wills' claim is without merit. ...
We affirm the judgment of the district court ...
http://tinyurl.com/2n229g
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kent Wills" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
19 Aug 2007 09:04:09 PM |
|
|
As I understand it, on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:57:16 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez
_" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <= will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
Why do you lie at EVERY opportunity?
Who claimed he's a hacker, super or otherwise?
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
That you used the same writing style was enough to convince
her. It was enough to make me *suspect* you, but I had the posts
traced in hopes that they would lead to a location other than yours.
If they ended in Alabama, for example, it would have been strong
evidence that it wasn't you.
Of course, you knew any trace would end with you.
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Please offer evidence that everyone else who has read it
agrees with your claim.
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
That's a new one to me. I've not hear nor read "as when one
finds a fish in the milk."
I'm curious as to what it's supposed to mean, exactly.
--
Kent
jonez/vox/ultra/whatever advocates murdering a woman for being Wiccan.
Message-ID: <5iieliF3pnbpnU1@mid.individual.net>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "forevernitefan" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
20 Aug 2007 11:16:11 PM |
|
|
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <=3D will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Be honest Eric,. Hardly anyone cares about your spanning posts. Funny
how no one except Tjab is supporting you. Here's the point, you idiot.
The whole subject is limited to you, Kent and myself. No one else
gives a crap. No one gives a crap about your anti-Christian spamming.
You credibility, such as itis, is nil online Eric. Hell, even Sammy
knows what kind of crudsucker you are.
..
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary ...
Wills' claim is without merit. ...
We affirm the judgment of the district court ...
http://tinyurl.com/2n229g
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.
|
|
|
| User: "tjab" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
20 Aug 2007 11:30:33 PM |
|
|
In article <1187669771.936561.205640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <=3D will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Be honest Eric,. Hardly anyone cares about your spanning posts. Funny
how no one except Tjab is supporting you. Here's the point, you idiot.
The whole subject is limited to you, Kent and myself. No one else
gives a crap. No one gives a crap about your anti-Christian spamming.
You credibility, such as itis, is nil online Eric. Hell, even Sammy
knows what kind of crudsucker you are.
.
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary ...
Wills' claim is without merit. ...
We affirm the judgment of the district court ...
http://tinyurl.com/2n229g
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kent Wills" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
21 Aug 2007 11:17:31 PM |
|
|
As I understand it, on 21 Aug 2007 00:30:33 -0400,
(tjab) wrote:
[...]
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
Neat. When were you in Iowa? or was it Ohio (you've claimed
it was both at different times)? Or maybe it was the mythical state
of Ankeny.
I'm simply curious here.
--
Kent
"I'm a ten gov a day guy. It's all I know, and it's all
you need to know, gov!"
- Shouting George
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "forevernitefan" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
21 Aug 2007 01:31:55 AM |
|
|
tjab wrote:
In article <1187669771.936561.205640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <=3D will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Be honest Eric,. Hardly anyone cares about your spanning posts. Funny
how no one except Tjab is supporting you. Here's the point, you idiot.
The whole subject is limited to you, Kent and myself. No one else
gives a crap. No one gives a crap about your anti-Christian spamming.
You credibility, such as itis, is nil online Eric. Hell, even Sammy
knows what kind of crudsucker you are.
.
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary ...
Wills' claim is without merit. ...
We affirm the judgment of the district court ...
http://tinyurl.com/2n229g
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Oh really Tjab? You actually went to the Idaho courthouse where these
alleged charges were filed and court documents saved and actually saw
the PHYSICAL documents about " Kent Bradley Wills"? Oh REALLY? The
point is the actual documents Tjab, not references to an online site.
Actual documents, Tjab, The paperwork actually filed and stored at
the courthouse. You got copies of THOSE on Kent B. Wills?
Listen, I would give your claims about Kent some thought if you
actually had gone there, found the files and copied the relevant
documents. These are offical records, Tjab. They would be independent
proof of your claims about Kent. But you know as well as I do you
didn't bother to actually go there.
Once again to get though that thick skull of yours, the proof for me
would be the actual legal documents, the physical records, not a
frigging cite online. You got them or not?
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kent Wills" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
21 Aug 2007 11:23:40 PM |
|
|
As I understand it, on Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:31:55 -0700, forevernitefan
<fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Oh really Tjab? You actually went to the Idaho
Now it's Idaho?
Don't confuse the kid, Moe. He already claims it was Iowa
and/or Ohio. Also he's claimed it was in a state called Ankeny,
though no one else seems to be aware that Ankeny was made a state.
courthouse where these
alleged charges were filed and court documents saved and actually saw
the PHYSICAL documents about " Kent Bradley Wills"? Oh REALLY? The
point is the actual documents Tjab, not references to an online site.
He's DESPERATE for a win. I've beaten him (metaphorically
speaking) so bad so many times, that he's grasping for whatever he
can.
He's lost. Deep down he knows this, but is unable to accept
this. I still suspect it's a maturity thing, but there are other
possible answers.
That Lin isn't "white" is starting to look equally plausible.
Actual documents, Tjab, The paperwork actually filed and stored at
the courthouse. You got copies of THOSE on Kent B. Wills?
No. He flat out lied when he wrote that he saw them.
Listen, I would give your claims about Kent some thought if you
actually had gone there, found the files and copied the relevant
documents. These are offical records, Tjab. They would be independent
proof of your claims about Kent. But you know as well as I do you
didn't bother to actually go there.
The records would be public information. No one can stop
someone from looking them up and having copies made.
Once again to get though that thick skull of yours, the proof for me
would be the actual legal documents, the physical records, not a
frigging cite online. You got them or not?
He doesn't.
True, he can't even pick a state for the offence, so going to
the court house for the county in which ever state will be tricky.
Personally, I'd like to visit the mythical state of Ankeny.
Last I knew it was a city/town in the state of Iowa (there may be
Ankenys in other states, but I've not checked).
--
Kent
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "forevernitefan" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 06:47:07 AM |
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
As I understand it, on Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:31:55 -0700, forevernitefan
<fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Oh really Tjab? You actually went to the Idaho
Now it's Idaho?
Don't confuse the kid, Moe. He already claims it was Iowa
and/or Ohio. Also he's claimed it was in a state called Ankeny,
though no one else seems to be aware that Ankeny was made a state.
(( innocent look)) Tjab doesn't seem to be good at remembering the
details. I was hoping he'd catch that deliberate mistake and rag me
for it. It would have shown whether or not he's doing this just to
have ammo on you or whether he's actually thinks the charges are
real. I've pretty much determined he is clueless ( intetionally or
just plain stupdity) about my wanting the actual court documents. Twit
actually thinks a law library reference cite is " proof".
..
courthouse where these
alleged charges were filed and court documents saved and actually saw
the PHYSICAL documents about " Kent Bradley Wills"? Oh REALLY? The
point is the actual documents Tjab, not references to an online site.
He's DESPERATE for a win. I've beaten him (metaphorically
speaking) so bad so many times, that he's grasping for whatever he
can.
He's lost. Deep down he knows this, but is unable to accept
this. I still suspect it's a maturity thing, but there are other
possible answers.
That Lin isn't "white" is starting to look equally plausible.
Actual documents, Tjab, The paperwork actually filed and stored at
the courthouse. You got copies of THOSE on Kent B. Wills?
No. He flat out lied when he wrote that he saw them.
Agreed.
Listen, I would give your claims about Kent some thought if you
actually had gone there, found the files and copied the relevant
documents. These are offical records, Tjab. They would be independent
proof of your claims about Kent. But you know as well as I do you
didn't bother to actually go there.
The records would be public information. No one can stop
someone from looking them up and having copies made.
Bingo.
Once again to get though that thick skull of yours, the proof for me
would be the actual legal documents, the physical records, not a
frigging cite online. You got them or not?
He doesn't.
True, he can't even pick a state for the offence, so going to
the court house for the county in which ever state will be tricky.
Personally, I'd like to visit the mythical state of Ankeny.
Last I knew it was a city/town in the state of Iowa (there may be
Ankenys in other states, but I've not checked).
--
Kent
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kent Wills" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 04:58:29 PM |
|
|
As I understand it, on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:47:07 -0700, forevernitefan
<fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
Kent Wills wrote:
As I understand it, on Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:31:55 -0700, forevernitefan
<fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Oh really Tjab? You actually went to the Idaho
Now it's Idaho?
Don't confuse the kid, Moe. He already claims it was Iowa
and/or Ohio. Also he's claimed it was in a state called Ankeny,
though no one else seems to be aware that Ankeny was made a state.
(( innocent look)) Tjab doesn't seem to be good at remembering the
details. I was hoping he'd catch that deliberate mistake and rag me
for it. It would have shown whether or not he's doing this just to
have ammo on you or whether he's actually thinks the charges are
real. I've pretty much determined he is clueless ( intetionally or
just plain stupdity) about my wanting the actual court documents. Twit
actually thinks a law library reference cite is " proof".
It's valid as far as a citation goes. Of course, it's not
nearly as good as having certified copies of the actual documents. As
Jonezie claimed, while posting as the racist poster, the documents
don't exist. Of course, using Jonezie as a source doesn't really help
my position any.
[...]
--
Kent
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEJfS1v-fU0
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tjab" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 01:52:43 PM |
|
|
In article <1187783227.951470.236030@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
(( innocent look)) Tjab doesn't seem to be good at remembering the
details. I was hoping he'd catch that deliberate mistake and rag me
for it. It would have shown whether or not he's doing this just to
have ammo on you or whether he's actually thinks the charges are
real. I've pretty much determined he is clueless ( intetionally or
just plain stupdity) about my wanting the actual court documents. Twit
actually thinks a law library reference cite is " proof".
Silly me, going by the Iowa Supreme Court's official reporter. Bet all
the lawyers here must think I'm pretty stupid now, eh Moe?
(In case you didn't catch it, calling me a "twit" over this is analogous
to Kent calling someone "stupid" for thinking humans exhale carbon dioxide.)
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
STATE of Iowa, Appellee
v.
Kent Bradley Wills
No. 04-0202
Supreme Court of Iowa
May 6, 2005
[Kent's felony conviction for burglarizing an occupied structure is
upheld on appeal.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kent Wills" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 05:40:12 PM |
|
|
As I understand it, on 22 Aug 2007 14:52:43 -0400,
(tjab) wrote:
In article <1187783227.951470.236030@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
(( innocent look)) Tjab doesn't seem to be good at remembering the
details. I was hoping he'd catch that deliberate mistake and rag me
for it. It would have shown whether or not he's doing this just to
have ammo on you or whether he's actually thinks the charges are
real. I've pretty much determined he is clueless ( intetionally or
just plain stupdity) about my wanting the actual court documents. Twit
actually thinks a law library reference cite is " proof".
Silly me, going by the Iowa Supreme Court's official reporter. Bet all
the lawyers here must think I'm pretty stupid now, eh Moe?
(In case you didn't catch it, calling me a "twit" over this is analogous
to Kent calling someone "stupid" for thinking humans exhale carbon dioxide.)
At least I know a town or city within a state isn't the state.
According to you, Ankeny is a state.
Of course, you also think the case was tried in Ohio.
Once you've decided on a set of facts, as you want them to be,
come back.
--
Kent
The irony of life is that, by the time
you're old enough to know your way
around, you're not going anywhere.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "forevernitefan" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 03:28:33 PM |
|
|
tjab wiped Eric's ***** from his mouth and wrote:
In article <1187783227.951470.236030@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
(( innocent look)) Tjab doesn't seem to be good at remembering the
details. I was hoping he'd catch that deliberate mistake and rag me
for it. It would have shown whether or not he's doing this just to
have ammo on you or whether he's actually thinks the charges are
real. I've pretty much determined he is clueless ( intetionally or
just plain stupdity) about my wanting the actual court documents. Twit
actually thinks a law library reference cite is " proof".
Silly me, going by the Iowa Supreme Court's official reporter. Bet all
the lawyers here must think I'm pretty stupid now, eh Moe?
(In case you didn't catch it, calling me a "twit" over this is analogous
to Kent calling someone "stupid" for thinking humans exhale carbon dioxide.)
"Twit" was the mildest word I have for you Tjab. BTW thank you for
replying to my post,. I guess you depend upon my posts to give you
validity. Trust me on this, peewee peepee, if i wanted to call you
names and let loose, I could do it with ease. I just don't want to
shock the poor guys. :-D
Simply put Tjab I asked you for copies of the actual documents you
physically found at the courthouse and copied under the cherk's
permission. You claimed you saw them., so you must have actually gone
to the courthouse and looked up "Kent Bradley Wills". Presumably you
didn't come that far to leave empty-handed, did you?
But then again if you LIED about that.... :-D Also I will repeat this
again and again every time you try to do your dodge of the subject,
like you just did. I doubt you are that stupid that you don't know
exactly what I am talking about. But then you don't seem to be all
that smart to begin with.
As for the Kent blast from your dime store squirt gun you know he
meant carbon monoxide and he admitted his error. Stick to the facts,
winky.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.
|
|
|
| User: "tjab" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 03:51:43 PM |
|
|
In article <1187814513.290049.216370@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab wiped Eric's ***** from his mouth and wrote:
In article <1187783227.951470.236030@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
(( innocent look)) Tjab doesn't seem to be good at remembering the
details. I was hoping he'd catch that deliberate mistake and rag me
for it. It would have shown whether or not he's doing this just to
have ammo on you or whether he's actually thinks the charges are
real. I've pretty much determined he is clueless ( intetionally or
just plain stupdity) about my wanting the actual court documents. Twit
actually thinks a law library reference cite is " proof".
Silly me, going by the Iowa Supreme Court's official reporter. Bet all
the lawyers here must think I'm pretty stupid now, eh Moe?
(In case you didn't catch it, calling me a "twit" over this is analogous
to Kent calling someone "stupid" for thinking humans exhale carbon dioxide.)
"Twit" was the mildest word I have for you Tjab. BTW thank you for
replying to my post,. I guess you depend upon my posts to give you
validity. Trust me on this, peewee peepee, if i wanted to call you
names and let loose, I could do it with ease. I just don't want to
shock the poor guys. :-D
Simply put Tjab I asked you for copies of the actual documents you
physically found at the courthouse and copied under the cherk's
permission. You claimed you saw them., so you must have actually gone
to the courthouse and looked up "Kent Bradley Wills". Presumably you
didn't come that far to leave empty-handed, did you?
But then again if you LIED about that.... :-D Also I will repeat this
again and again every time you try to do your dodge of the subject,
like you just did. I doubt you are that stupid that you don't know
exactly what I am talking about. But then you don't seem to be all
that smart to begin with.
As for the Kent blast from your dime store squirt gun you know he
meant carbon monoxide and he admitted his error. Stick to the facts,
winky.
Toilet mouth, why would I want to go to Iowa when the official reporter for
the Iowa Supreme Court is in every decent-sized law library in the country?
.
|
|
|
| User: "forevernitefan" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 04:09:13 PM |
|
|
tjab apped up the last of his cutomers used condoms and wrote:
In article <1187814513.290049.216370@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab wiped Eric's ***** from his mouth and wrote:
In article <1187783227.951470.236030@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
(( innocent look)) Tjab doesn't seem to be good at remembering the
details. I was hoping he'd catch that deliberate mistake and rag me
for it. It would have shown whether or not he's doing this just to
have ammo on you or whether he's actually thinks the charges are
real. I've pretty much determined he is clueless ( intetionally or
just plain stupdity) about my wanting the actual court documents. Twit
actually thinks a law library reference cite is " proof".
Silly me, going by the Iowa Supreme Court's official reporter. Bet all
the lawyers here must think I'm pretty stupid now, eh Moe?
(In case you didn't catch it, calling me a "twit" over this is analogous
to Kent calling someone "stupid" for thinking humans exhale carbon dioxide.)
"Twit" was the mildest word I have for you Tjab. BTW thank you for
replying to my post,. I guess you depend upon my posts to give you
validity. Trust me on this, peewee peepee, if i wanted to call you
names and let loose, I could do it with ease. I just don't want to
shock the poor guys. :-D
Simply put Tjab I asked you for copies of the actual documents you
physically found at the courthouse and copied under the cherk's
permission. You claimed you saw them., so you must have actually gone
to the courthouse and looked up "Kent Bradley Wills". Presumably you
didn't come that far to leave empty-handed, did you?
But then again if you LIED about that.... :-D Also I will repeat this
again and again every time you try to do your dodge of the subject,
like you just did. I doubt you are that stupid that you don't know
exactly what I am talking about. But then you don't seem to be all
that smart to begin with.
As for the Kent blast from your dime store squirt gun you know he
meant carbon monoxide and he admitted his error. Stick to the facts,
winky.
Toilet mouth, why would I want to go to Iowa when the official reporter for
the Iowa Supreme Court is in every decent-sized law library in the country?
Ah so when you claimed you saw the actual documents, you lied? In
order to see the actual paperwork , the legal documents you would have
to physically go to the courthouse in question. So did yuo or did you
not go to that courthouse? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Yes or no Tjab. Pick one.
BTW the legal doucnets, the actual paperwork will NOT be in "every
decent sized law library" as you claim. They would be stored at the
courthouse relevant to the charges filed. THIS is what I am referring
to, Tjab. You got copies of THOSE or not? Yes or no.
(( rolls eyes)) Here comes his evasion again. The guy should be a
politician or a janitor at a whorehouse.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "forevernitefan" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 04:01:26 PM |
|
|
tjab unhooked his ***** from the vibrator and wrote:
In article <1187814513.290049.216370@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab wiped Eric's ***** from his mouth and wrote:
In article <1187783227.951470.236030@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
(( innocent look)) Tjab doesn't seem to be good at remembering the
details. I was hoping he'd catch that deliberate mistake and rag me
for it. It would have shown whether or not he's doing this just to
have ammo on you or whether he's actually thinks the charges are
real. I've pretty much determined he is clueless ( intetionally or
just plain stupdity) about my wanting the actual court documents. Twit
actually thinks a law library reference cite is " proof".
Silly me, going by the Iowa Supreme Court's official reporter. Bet all
the lawyers here must think I'm pretty stupid now, eh Moe?
(In case you didn't catch it, calling me a "twit" over this is analogous
to Kent calling someone "stupid" for thinking humans exhale carbon dioxide.)
"Twit" was the mildest word I have for you Tjab. BTW thank you for
replying to my post,. I guess you depend upon my posts to give you
validity. Trust me on this, peewee peepee, if i wanted to call you
names and let loose, I could do it with ease. I just don't want to
shock the poor guys. :-D
Simply put Tjab I asked you for copies of the actual documents you
physically found at the courthouse and copied under the cherk's
permission. You claimed you saw them., so you must have actually gone
to the courthouse and looked up "Kent Bradley Wills". Presumably you
didn't come that far to leave empty-handed, did you?
But then again if you LIED about that.... :-D Also I will repeat this
again and again every time you try to do your dodge of the subject,
like you just did. I doubt you are that stupid that you don't know
exactly what I am talking about. But then you don't seem to be all
that smart to begin with.
As for the Kent blast from your dime store squirt gun you know he
meant carbon monoxide and he admitted his error. Stick to the facts,
winky.
Toilet mouth, why would I want to go to Iowa when the official reporter for
the Iowa Supreme Court is in every decent-sized law library in the country?
Again I was referring to the actual court documents stored in the
courthouse. Is this something you don't understand. Tjab? I am being
plain about what I am referring to, simple enough that you SHOULD
understand it. EiIther you are consciously overlooking that or you
are incredibly stupid. Is there any other explanation why you are
ignoring this specirfic matter?
BTW thank you dear for responding to my post again. You respond so
easily to my posts yet you seem to have had some difficulty responding
to the white supremacist/ Jonez posts while Kent was on vacation.
Perhaps your computer was on the blink, or your hypocritical sense of
morality was shut off.
Also I do seem to remember that you said you wouldn't play this "
shell game" with me anymore since I am such a potty mouth. f you can't
keep your word on this simple thing , why should I believe anything
you say?
Damn you are fun to play with!!
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kent Wills" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 05:43:41 PM |
|
|
As I understand it, on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:01:26 -0700, forevernitefan
<fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
[snip to focus on these points]
BTW thank you dear for responding to my post again. You respond so
easily to my posts yet you seem to have had some difficulty responding
to the white supremacist/ Jonez posts while Kent was on vacation.
Perhaps your computer was on the blink, or your hypocritical sense of
morality was shut off.
The only answer at this point is that tjab agrees that I
should be murdered for being in a "mixed" marriage.
If his computer was acting up, he would have said so. If he
was busy with real life, and didn't see the posts until well after
Jonezie ceased posting them, he would have said so.
Also I do seem to remember that you said you wouldn't play this "
shell game" with me anymore since I am such a potty mouth. f you can't
keep your word on this simple thing , why should I believe anything
you say?
Damn you are fun to play with!!
He is easy to manipulate. This is due to his probable age
(late teens/early 20's). He lacks the life experience to see when
he's being forced into posting as others wish.
--
Kent
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tjab" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
21 Aug 2007 12:13:29 PM |
|
|
In article <1187677915.374969.185640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab wrote:
In article <1187669771.936561.205640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <=3D will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Be honest Eric,. Hardly anyone cares about your spanning posts. Funny
how no one except Tjab is supporting you. Here's the point, you idiot.
The whole subject is limited to you, Kent and myself. No one else
gives a crap. No one gives a crap about your anti-Christian spamming.
You credibility, such as itis, is nil online Eric. Hell, even Sammy
knows what kind of crudsucker you are.
.
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary ...
Wills' claim is without merit. ...
We affirm the judgment of the district court ...
http://tinyurl.com/2n229g
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Oh really Tjab? You actually went to the Idaho courthouse where these
alleged charges were filed and court documents saved and actually saw
the PHYSICAL documents about " Kent Bradley Wills"? Oh REALLY? The
point is the actual documents Tjab, not references to an online site.
Actual documents, Tjab, The paperwork actually filed and stored at
the courthouse. You got copies of THOSE on Kent B. Wills?
Listen, I would give your claims about Kent some thought if you
actually had gone there, found the files and copied the relevant
documents. These are offical records, Tjab. They would be independent
proof of your claims about Kent. But you know as well as I do you
didn't bother to actually go there.
Once again to get though that thick skull of yours, the proof for me
would be the actual legal documents, the physical records, not a
frigging cite online. You got them or not?
Can you read, Moe? The reference I gave you was not for an online cite.
Cases decided by the Iowa Supreme Court are important enough that they
are available, in print, in any good law library in the United States.
These are legal documents, citable and recognized as binding case law in
any court in the state of Iowa. So take the cite I gave you, go to a
good law library, show it to the reference librarian there, and s/he
will show you the case. If, as I said, you've got the character to take
an honest look.
That said, I've had enough of your shell game. If it's online, on an
official Iowa state court website, well, that's not good enough for
you. Why not? You do know it would be a felony to put a false record
of an Iowa Supreme Court case on an official state website, don't you?
But wait, when I give you the cite in print, in the official recorder
recognized by the Iowa courts as authoritative, that's not good enough
for you either; now you want to know why you should take my word for
it. Well, the answer is this: if you're arguing in good faith (and not
just playing the above mentioned shell game), you won't take my word for
it. You'll do what I said, get off your ***** and go to a law library and
ask to see it. If you can't do that much, then I'm done with your silly
evasions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kent Wills" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
22 Aug 2007 04:53:56 PM |
|
|
As I understand it, on 21 Aug 2007 13:13:29 -0400,
(tjab) wrote:
Once again to get though that thick skull of yours, the proof for me
would be the actual legal documents, the physical records, not a
frigging cite online. You got them or not?
Can you read, Moe?
That's ALMOST funny. You consistently PROVE that you don't
have the physical documents.
The reference I gave you was not for an online cite.
Cases decided by the Iowa Supreme Court are important enough that they
are available, in print, in any good law library in the United States.
Probably some bad ones as well :)
These are legal documents, citable and recognized as binding case law in
any court in the state of Iowa. So take the cite I gave you, go to a
good law library, show it to the reference librarian there, and s/he
will show you the case. If, as I said, you've got the character to take
an honest look.
Why not answer the question she asked; do you have physically
copies of the original documents?
The answer is no, of course. Why not TRY some honesty and
just admit it?
That said, I've had enough of your shell game. If it's online, on an
official Iowa state court website, well, that's not good enough for
you. Why not?
Possibly because you're the ONLY person able to access them
via a search? Just a guess on my part, of course.
You do know it would be a felony to put a false record
of an Iowa Supreme Court case on an official state website, don't you?
Except under certain circumstances.
But wait, when I give you the cite in print, in the official recorder
recognized by the Iowa courts as authoritative, that's not good enough
for you either; now you want to know why you should take my word for
it. Well, the answer is this: if you're arguing in good faith (and not
just playing the above mentioned shell game), you won't take my word for
it.
Should she go to Iowa and see the lack of records herself?
You'll do what I said, get off your ***** and go to a law library and
ask to see it. If you can't do that much, then I'm done with your silly
evasions.
Someone's getting pissed that actual evidence is being
requested.
Time to grow up, tjab. You aren't a 10 year old anymore, able
to maybe get away with a tantrum.
--
Kent
A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "forevernitefan" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
21 Aug 2007 02:05:02 PM |
|
|
tjab( Jonez's ***** puppet) licks Eric's ***** off his lips and pouts:
In article <1187677915.374969.185640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab wrote:
In article <1187669771.936561.205640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <=3D will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Be honest Eric,. Hardly anyone cares about your spanning posts. Funny
how no one except Tjab is supporting you. Here's the point, you idiot.
The whole subject is limited to you, Kent and myself. No one else
gives a crap. No one gives a crap about your anti-Christian spamming.
You credibility, such as itis, is nil online Eric. Hell, even Sammy
knows what kind of crudsucker you are.
.
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary ...
Wills' claim is without merit. ...
We affirm the judgment of the district court ...
http://tinyurl.com/2n229g
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Oh really Tjab? You actually went to the Idaho courthouse where these
alleged charges were filed and court documents saved and actually saw
the PHYSICAL documents about " Kent Bradley Wills"? Oh REALLY? The
point is the actual documents Tjab, not references to an online site.
Actual documents, Tjab, The paperwork actually filed and stored at
the courthouse. You got copies of THOSE on Kent B. Wills?
Listen, I would give your claims about Kent some thought if you
actually had gone there, found the files and copied the relevant
documents. These are offical records, Tjab. They would be independent
proof of your claims about Kent. But you know as well as I do you
didn't bother to actually go there.
Once again to get though that thick skull of yours, the proof for me
would be the actual legal documents, the physical records, not a
frigging cite online. You got them or not?
Can you read, Moe? The reference I gave you was not for an online cite.
Cases decided by the Iowa Supreme Court are important enough that they
are available, in print, in any good law library in the United States.
These are legal documents, citable and recognized as binding case law in
any court in the state of Iowa. So take the cite I gave you, go to a
good law library, show it to the reference librarian there, and s/he
will show you the case. If, as I said, you've got the character to take
an honest look.
You obviously missed my point, as usual with your severe denial. I
was referring to actual court documents AT THE COURTHOUSE You claimed
you saw these legal documents, and yet you can't frigging show copies
you made of them. Man you are such a liar it isn't funny Tjab. Your
hatred of Kent is so bad that you won't even admit your " sources"a re
what you've been told online, not anything you actually physically
done yourself..
That said, I've had enough of your shell game. If it's online, on an
official Iowa state court website, well, that's not good enough for
you. Why not? You do know it would be a felony to put a false record
of an Iowa Supreme Court case on an official state website, don't you?
Web sites can be faked. I prefer the actual documents. Documents you
claim you saw but can't prove you actually ever been to the
courthouse, much less sifted through the actual files. And you NEVER
addressed why the felony chargres suddenly changed in severity and
amount. Care to address that discrepancy, or are you going to ignore
it as usual because it would mean admitting what you have is fake.
But wait, when I give you the cite in print, in the official recorder
recognized by the Iowa courts as authoritative, that's not good enough
for you either; now you want to know why you should take my word for
it. Well, the answer is this: if you're arguing in good faith (and not
just playing the above mentioned shell game), you won't take my word for
it. You'll do what I said, get off your ***** and go to a law library and
ask to see it. If you can't do that much, then I'm done with your silly
evasions.
The actual documents of the case on " Kernt B. Wills" is not in any
law library, dude, its at the specific Iowa courthouse. Nice evasion
of what you KNOW I was referring to. I asm being honest tjab, If Kent
really was arrested for these crimes I want proof. You and your butt
buddy Eric repeating it ad nauseum is not proof. The actual court
documents are proof, Tjab. DO you have copies of the physical
documents or not? Yes or no. Crickets on standby, coward.
BTW ***** I don't take orders from you. Get off YOUR OWN ***** and
show me the Iowa court documents.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.
|
|
|
| User: "tjab" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
21 Aug 2007 03:16:21 PM |
|
|
In article <1187723102.828699.33230@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab( Jonez's ***** puppet) licks Eric's ***** off his lips and pouts:
In article <1187677915.374969.185640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab wrote:
In article <1187669771.936561.205640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <=3D will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Be honest Eric,. Hardly anyone cares about your spanning posts. Funny
how no one except Tjab is supporting you. Here's the point, you idiot.
The whole subject is limited to you, Kent and myself. No one else
gives a crap. No one gives a crap about your anti-Christian spamming.
You credibility, such as itis, is nil online Eric. Hell, even Sammy
knows what kind of crudsucker you are.
.
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary ...
Wills' claim is without merit. ...
We affirm the judgment of the district court ...
http://tinyurl.com/2n229g
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Oh really Tjab? You actually went to the Idaho courthouse where these
alleged charges were filed and court documents saved and actually saw
the PHYSICAL documents about " Kent Bradley Wills"? Oh REALLY? The
point is the actual documents Tjab, not references to an online site.
Actual documents, Tjab, The paperwork actually filed and stored at
the courthouse. You got copies of THOSE on Kent B. Wills?
Listen, I would give your claims about Kent some thought if you
actually had gone there, found the files and copied the relevant
documents. These are offical records, Tjab. They would be independent
proof of your claims about Kent. But you know as well as I do you
didn't bother to actually go there.
Once again to get though that thick skull of yours, the proof for me
would be the actual legal documents, the physical records, not a
frigging cite online. You got them or not?
Can you read, Moe? The reference I gave you was not for an online cite.
Cases decided by the Iowa Supreme Court are important enough that they
are available, in print, in any good law library in the United States.
These are legal documents, citable and recognized as binding case law in
any court in the state of Iowa. So take the cite I gave you, go to a
good law library, show it to the reference librarian there, and s/he
will show you the case. If, as I said, you've got the character to take
an honest look.
You obviously missed my point, as usual with your severe denial. I
was referring to actual court documents AT THE COURTHOUSE You claimed
you saw these legal documents, and yet you can't frigging show copies
you made of them. Man you are such a liar it isn't funny Tjab. Your
hatred of Kent is so bad that you won't even admit your " sources"a re
what you've been told online, not anything you actually physically
done yourself..
That said, I've had enough of your shell game. If it's online, on an
official Iowa state court website, well, that's not good enough for
you. Why not? You do know it would be a felony to put a false record
of an Iowa Supreme Court case on an official state website, don't you?
Web sites can be faked. I prefer the actual documents. Documents you
claim you saw but can't prove you actually ever been to the
courthouse, much less sifted through the actual files. And you NEVER
addressed why the felony chargres suddenly changed in severity and
amount. Care to address that discrepancy, or are you going to ignore
it as usual because it would mean admitting what you have is fake.
But wait, when I give you the cite in print, in the official recorder
recognized by the Iowa courts as authoritative, that's not good enough
for you either; now you want to know why you should take my word for
it. Well, the answer is this: if you're arguing in good faith (and not
just playing the above mentioned shell game), you won't take my word for
it. You'll do what I said, get off your ***** and go to a law library and
ask to see it. If you can't do that much, then I'm done with your silly
evasions.
The actual documents of the case on " Kernt B. Wills" is not in any
law library, dude, its at the specific Iowa courthouse. Nice evasion
of what you KNOW I was referring to. I asm being honest tjab, If Kent
really was arrested for these crimes I want proof. You and your butt
buddy Eric repeating it ad nauseum is not proof. The actual court
documents are proof, Tjab. DO you have copies of the physical
documents or not? Yes or no. Crickets on standby, coward.
BTW ***** I don't take orders from you. Get off YOUR OWN ***** and
show me the Iowa court documents.
Sorry, toilet mouth, I don't take orders from you either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "forevernitefan" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
21 Aug 2007 06:59:24 PM |
|
|
tjab wrote:
In article <1187723102.828699.33230@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab( Jonez's ***** puppet) licks Eric's ***** off his lips and pouts:
In article <1187677915.374969.185640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
tjab wrote:
In article <1187669771.936561.205640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
tjab wrote:
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
"=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
__ A Day Without a Mexican ! <=3D will destroy the already faltering
U$ economy ... reap what ye sow, Repug imbeciles !
"He's a fucking race traitor. Kill him, his spic pet, and the
demon spawn they created."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent Wills married a spic named Joquina Cruz. They have two
half-breed children. All of them should be put to death. First the
race traitor Kent, then the genetic misfits they produced, then the
pet spic."
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Kent has committed the greatest crime imaginable. He
betrayed his own race!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
"Death to Kent Wills and all race traitors!"
-- Kent Wills' pathetic joe-job
Kent, how many times are you going to spam this libel? Do you think
if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? Do you have
the slightest conception of how badly you are embarrassing yourself?
Because (unlike you) I am a fair minded person, I will provide space
below for you to offer proof of vox, ultra, or jonez being the author
of the above quotes. However, I do not anticipate that you will use it
for that purpose.
What? You don't consider Kent's imaginary "friend", the super-hacker,
and Foreverignorant's clueless linguistic assertions of inductive
and deductive fallacy to be "proof" ?
Not to worry, nobody else does either.
Be honest Eric,. Hardly anyone cares about your spanning posts. Funny
how no one except Tjab is supporting you. Here's the point, you idiot.
The whole subject is limited to you, Kent and myself. No one else
gives a crap. No one gives a crap about your anti-Christian spamming.
You credibility, such as itis, is nil online Eric. Hell, even Sammy
knows what kind of crudsucker you are.
.
Then again, some evidence is so strong ... as when one finds a fish
in the milk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary ...
Wills' claim is without merit. ...
We affirm the judgment of the district court ...
http://tinyurl.com/2n229g
And yet you can't get the physical documents, coward. Wonder why?
On the contrary, I've seen them. Go to a law library and you can see them
for yourself, if you've got enough character to take an honest look.
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Oh really Tjab? You actually went to the Idaho courthouse where these
alleged charges were filed and court documents saved and actually saw
the PHYSICAL documents about " Kent Bradley Wills"? Oh REALLY? The
point is the actual documents Tjab, not references to an online site.
Actual documents, Tjab, The paperwork actually filed and stored at
the courthouse. You got copies of THOSE on Kent B. Wills?
Listen, I would give your claims about Kent some thought if you
actually had gone there, found the files and copied the relevant
documents. These are offical records, Tjab. They would be independent
proof of your claims about Kent. But you know as well as I do you
didn't bother to actually go there.
Once again to get though that thick skull of yours, the proof for me
would be the actual legal documents, the physical records, not a
frigging cite online. You got them or not?
Can you read, Moe? The reference I gave you was not for an online cite.
Cases decided by the Iowa Supreme Court are important enough that they
are available, in print, in any good law library in the United States.
These are legal documents, citable and recognized as binding case law in
any court in the state of Iowa. So take the cite I gave you, go to a
good law library, show it to the reference librarian there, and s/he
will show you the case. If, as I said, you've got the character to take
an honest look.
You obviously missed my point, as usual with your severe denial. I
was referring to actual court documents AT THE COURTHOUSE You claimed
you saw these legal documents, and yet you can't frigging show copies
you made of them. Man you are such a liar it isn't funny Tjab. Your
hatred of Kent is so bad that you won't even admit your " sources"a re
what you've been told online, not anything you actually physically
done yourself..
That said, I've had enough of your shell game. If it's online, on an
official Iowa state court website, well, that's not good enough for
you. Why not? You do know it would be a felony to put a false record
of an Iowa Supreme Court case on an official state website, don't you?
Web sites can be faked. I prefer the actual documents. Documents you
claim you saw but can't prove you actually ever been to the
courthouse, much less sifted through the actual files. And you NEVER
addressed why the felony chargres suddenly changed in severity and
amount. Care to address that discrepancy, or are you going to ignore
it as usual because it would mean admitting what you have is fake.
But wait, when I give you the cite in print, in the official recorder
recognized by the Iowa courts as authoritative, that's not good enough
for you either; now you want to know why you should take my word for
it. Well, the answer is this: if you're arguing in good faith (and not
just playing the above mentioned shell game), you won't take my word for
it. You'll do what I said, get off your ***** and go to a law library and
ask to see it. If you can't do that much, then I'm done with your silly
evasions.
The actual documents of the case on " Kernt B. Wills" is not in any
law library, dude, its at the specific Iowa courthouse. Nice evasion
of what you KNOW I was referring to. I asm being honest tjab, If Kent
really was arrested for these crimes I want proof. You and your butt
buddy Eric repeating it ad nauseum is not proof. The actual court
documents are proof, Tjab. DO you have copies of the physical
documents or not? Yes or no. Crickets on standby, coward.
BTW ***** I don't take orders from you. Get off YOUR OWN ***** and
show me the Iowa court documents.
Sorry, toilet mouth, I don't take orders from you either.
So the point is you CAN'T show me copies of the actual documents. Got
it. Just as I thought.
As for my " tiolet mouth" you are the biggest ***** HYPOCRITE I've
met so far. You pose yourself as mistah clean but your standards if
rightand wrong are seriously skewed.
Do yourself a favor. Don't respond to my posts, poser.
Your phoniness is getting tiresome.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.
|
|
|
| User: "tjab" |
|
| Title: Re: __ A Day Without a Lie from Kent Wills ? <= will destroy the space-time continuum! __ |
21 Aug 2007 08:39:42 PM |
|
|
In article <1187740764.606314.246530@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
