|
|
| User: "Michael Nash" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
18 Oct 2003 11:56:19 PM |
|
|
(Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
--
Michael Nash - aa # 1651
*******************
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic
and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
--Teddy Roosevelt (Kansas City Star, 7 May 1918)
"But all in all, it's been a fabulous year for Laura and me."
--George W. Bush (12/21/01, three months after 9/11)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clayton of Green Gables..Tra la la la la" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
19 Oct 2003 04:34:32 AM |
|
|
"Michael Nash" <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132...
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
I think I know how this one ends.
--
Michael Nash - aa # 1651
*******************
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic
and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
--Teddy Roosevelt (Kansas City Star, 7 May 1918)
"But all in all, it's been a fabulous year for Laura and me."
--George W. Bush (12/21/01, three months after 9/11)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
19 Oct 2003 02:41:22 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:34:32 +1000, "Clayton of Green Gables..Tra la
la la la" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
"Michael Nash" <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132...
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
I think I know how this one ends.
Yeah, it's all fun and games 'til someone says "z"
--
Michael Nash - aa # 1651
*******************
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic
and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
--Teddy Roosevelt (Kansas City Star, 7 May 1918)
"But all in all, it's been a fabulous year for Laura and me."
--George W. Bush (12/21/01, three months after 9/11)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
19 Oct 2003 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
In article <Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132>, Michael
Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
And why isn't C++ E?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
19 Oct 2003 09:39:52 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:13:29 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132>, Michael
Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
And why isn't C++ E?
You mean D?
(++ is increment by one after all)
--
Mark K. Bilbo
From alt.atheism only
.
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
21 Oct 2003 08:23:20 PM |
|
|
In article <pan.2003.10.20.02.39.51.750075@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:13:29 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132>, Michael
Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
And why isn't C++ E?
You mean D?
(++ is increment by one after all)
<bashful grin>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I took
the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and another
plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+, wasn't there?
Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a C+++. And C #
(sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other C-mutants there are
out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new letters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
21 Oct 2003 09:04:11 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:23:20 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <pan.2003.10.20.02.39.51.750075@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:13:29 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132>, Michael
Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
And why isn't C++ E?
You mean D?
(++ is increment by one after all)
<bashful grin>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I took
the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and another
plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+, wasn't there?
Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a C+++. And C #
(sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other C-mutants there are
out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new letters.
C+++?
Sheesh!
--
Mark K. Bilbo - From alt.atheism only
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 01:34:46 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in
news:pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org:
<William Klee...>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I
took the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and
another plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+,
wasn't there? Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a
C+++. And C # (sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other
C-mutants there are out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new
letters.
C+++?
Sheesh!
Might as well start using Roman numerals if they have to add more plus
signs. Or use C, C+, C2+, C3+, etc.
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
"And the knowledge that they fear
Is a weapon to be used against them."
--Rush, "The Weapon"
.
|
|
|
| User: "G" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 02:52:22 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Doc Smartass wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in
news:pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org:
<William Klee...>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I
took the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and
another plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+,
wasn't there? Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a
C+++. And C # (sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other
C-mutants there are out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new
letters.
C+++?
Sheesh!
Might as well start using Roman numerals if they have to add more plus
signs. Or use C, C+, C2+, C3+, etc.
B.t.w.: I've never heard of C+. There was something like "C with classes",
which was the predecessor to C++. D exists, of course, don't know about E.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "G" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 02:50:16 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Doc Smartass wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in
news:pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org:
<William Klee...>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I
took the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and
another plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+,
wasn't there? Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a
C+++. And C # (sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other
C-mutants there are out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new
letters.
C+++?
Sheesh!
Might as well start using Roman numerals if they have to add more plus
signs. Or use C, C+, C2+, C3+, etc.
Yup. Or sub- and superscripts, like C_2, C^3. Or just multiples Cs:
CC, CCC. Or something more in the functional programming style, like
inc C, inc (inc C), inc (inc (inc C)), foldl (+) C (repeatn 4 1) ...
No need for other letters at all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 09:41:09 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:50:16 +0200, G wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Doc Smartass wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in
news:pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org:
<William Klee...>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I
took the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and
another plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+,
wasn't there? Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a
C+++. And C # (sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other
C-mutants there are out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new
letters.
C+++?
Sheesh!
Might as well start using Roman numerals if they have to add more plus
signs. Or use C, C+, C2+, C3+, etc.
Yup. Or sub- and superscripts, like C_2, C^3. Or just multiples Cs:
CC, CCC. Or something more in the functional programming style, like
inc C, inc (inc C), inc (inc (inc C)), foldl (+) C (repeatn 4 1) ...
AIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!
--
Mark K. Bilbo - From alt.atheism only
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 03:07:22 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in
news:pan.2003.10.22.14.41.09.59147@eac.org:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:50:16 +0200, G wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Doc Smartass wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in
news:pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org:
<William Klee...>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I
took the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and
another plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+,
wasn't there? Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a
C+++. And C # (sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other
C-mutants there are out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new
letters.
C+++?
Sheesh!
Might as well start using Roman numerals if they have to add more plus
signs. Or use C, C+, C2+, C3+, etc.
Yup. Or sub- and superscripts, like C_2, C^3. Or just multiples Cs:
CC, CCC. Or something more in the functional programming style, like
inc C, inc (inc C), inc (inc (inc C)), foldl (+) C (repeatn 4 1) ...
AIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!
I think you mean "AI++++E+++++++++++!+++++++++"
Or is that "A1I5E12!10" ?
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
"And the knowledge that they fear
Is a weapon to be used against them."
--Rush, "The Weapon"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
21 Oct 2003 09:59:25 PM |
|
|
In article <pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:23:20 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <pan.2003.10.20.02.39.51.750075@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:13:29 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132>, Michael
Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
And why isn't C++ E?
You mean D?
(++ is increment by one after all)
<bashful grin>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I took
the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and another
plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+, wasn't there?
Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a C+++. And C #
(sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other C-mutants there are
out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new letters.
C+++?
And that should be F.
Sheesh!
Buy a vowel, guys!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 09:42:08 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:59:25 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:23:20 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <pan.2003.10.20.02.39.51.750075@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:13:29 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132>, Michael
Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
And why isn't C++ E?
You mean D?
(++ is increment by one after all)
<bashful grin>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I took
the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and another
plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+, wasn't there?
Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a C+++. And C #
(sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other C-mutants there are
out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new letters.
C+++?
And that should be F.
Hm... well, given that ++ is a C operator, wouldn't that parse to D+ then
fail (as in "D plus WHAT?" the compiler complained).
--
Mark K. Bilbo - From alt.atheism only
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
| User: "G" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 10:25:01 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:59:25 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:23:20 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <pan.2003.10.20.02.39.51.750075@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:13:29 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132>, Michael
Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
And why isn't C++ E?
You mean D?
(++ is increment by one after all)
<bashful grin>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I took
the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and another
plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+, wasn't there?
Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a C+++. And C #
(sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other C-mutants there are
out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new letters.
C+++?
And that should be F.
Hm... well, given that ++ is a C operator, wouldn't that parse to D+ then
fail (as in "D plus WHAT?" the compiler complained).
<pedantic>
Or would it parse as (C+)++, after which the compiler complains?
Anyways, incrementing C is done _after_ evaluation of the expression, so
C+++ would always result in C + something unknown.
</pedantic>
cheers, G
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 11:21:04 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:25:01 +0200, G wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:59:25 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <pan.2003.10.22.02.04.10.911768@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:23:20 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <pan.2003.10.20.02.39.51.750075@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:13:29 -0500, William Klee wrote:
In article <Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132>, Michael
Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
And why isn't C++ E?
You mean D?
(++ is increment by one after all)
<bashful grin>
That was the question I asked my instructor last year, *before* I took
the class. I figured, 'OK, there's C, and C+ would be D, and another
plus would be E. If I recall rightly, there *was* a C+, wasn't there?
Just did a quick look on google & someone's offering a C+++. And C #
(sharp), and Objective C, and who knows what other C-mutants there are
out there. Really, guys, it's *ok* to use new letters.
C+++?
And that should be F.
Hm... well, given that ++ is a C operator, wouldn't that parse to D+ then
fail (as in "D plus WHAT?" the compiler complained).
<pedantic>
Or would it parse as (C+)++, after which the compiler complains?
Anyways, incrementing C is done _after_ evaluation of the expression, so
C+++ would always result in C + something unknown.
</pedantic>
cheers, G
Oh dear, I forgot you had the pedant flag on. <G>
--
Mark K. Bilbo - From alt.atheism only
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
19 Oct 2003 03:18:12 AM |
|
|
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the Alphabet
song*
um...is it...um...d?
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
"And the knowledge that they fear
Is a weapon to be used against them."
--Rush, "The Weapon"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
19 Oct 2003 06:44:11 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 +0000, Doc Smartass wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the Alphabet
song*
Oh. Great. Now it's stuck in my head.
I'll get you for that!
--
Mark K. Bilbo
From alt.atheism only
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
20 Oct 2003 04:00:52 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in
news:pan.2003.10.19.23.44.10.702361@eac.org:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 +0000, Doc Smartass wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963 @newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the
Alphabet song*
Oh. Great. Now it's stuck in my head.
I'll get you for that!
Ooops! I did it again... *runlikehell*
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
"And the knowledge that they fear
Is a weapon to be used against them."
--Rush, "The Weapon"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
19 Oct 2003 07:09:00 PM |
|
|
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the Alphabet
song*
Oh. Great. Now it's stuck in my head.
I'll get you for that!
Fortunately I've got the Ladysmith Black Mambazo version running through my
head which is much more palatable.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
19 Oct 2003 11:14:30 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the Alphabet
song*
um...is it...um...d?
Doe, a deer, a female deer...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
20 Oct 2003 08:24:07 AM |
|
|
In article <c9o6pvk9jo1863gvqf4057tkjklpfh4nat@4ax.com>, Michelle Malkin says...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the Alphabet
song*
um...is it...um...d?
Doe, a deer, a female deer...
Ray, a drop of golden sun..........
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
20 Oct 2003 03:51:20 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in
news:XlRkb.24646$cJ5.3892@www.newsranger.com:
In article <c9o6pvk9jo1863gvqf4057tkjklpfh4nat@4ax.com>, Michelle
Malkin says...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963 @newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the
Alphabet song*
um...is it...um...d?
Doe, a deer, a female deer...
Ray, a drop of golden sun..........
I believe the correct lyrics are:
X/
_------_
/ \ DO RE MI DRINK, by Homer J. Simpson.
| |
| | *ahem* La la la la.... *ahem* LAAAAAAA!!
| __ __)
| / \/ \ DO...... the stuff... that buys me beer...
/\/\ (o )o ) RAY..... the guy that sells me beer...
/c \__/ --. ME...... the guy... who drinks the beer,
( ) FAR..... a long way to get beer...
\_ _-------' SO...... I'll have another beer...
| / \ LA...... I'll have another beer...
| | '\_______) TEA..... no thanks, I'm drinking beer...
| \_____) That will bring us back to...
|______ | (Looks into an empty glass)
|___-__/\/\
/ \ D'OH!
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
"And the knowledge that they fear
Is a weapon to be used against them."
--Rush, "The Weapon"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "david asman" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
20 Oct 2003 08:42:00 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
In article <c9o6pvk9jo1863gvqf4057tkjklpfh4nat@4ax.com>, Michelle Malkin says...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the Alphabet
song*
um...is it...um...d?
Doe, a deer, a female deer...
Ray, a drop of golden sun..........
Me, a name I call myself. . .
(now that's going to be going
through my head all day)
Dave
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
20 Oct 2003 11:48:56 AM |
|
|
In article <3F93E628.680F131F@wayne.edu>, david asman says...
Robibnikoff wrote:
In article <c9o6pvk9jo1863gvqf4057tkjklpfh4nat@4ax.com>, Michelle Malkin says...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the Alphabet
song*
um...is it...um...d?
Doe, a deer, a female deer...
Ray, a drop of golden sun..........
Me, a name I call myself. . .
(now that's going to be going
through my head all day)
Ha! My nefarious plan worked! <cackle> ;D
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
21 Oct 2003 08:24:40 PM |
|
|
In article <YlUkb.24688$cJ5.3809@www.newsranger.com>, Robibnikoff
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
In article <3F93E628.680F131F@wayne.edu>, david asman says...
Robibnikoff wrote:
In article <c9o6pvk9jo1863gvqf4057tkjklpfh4nat@4ax.com>, Michelle Malkin
says...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the
Alphabet
song*
um...is it...um...d?
Doe, a deer, a female deer...
Ray, a drop of golden sun..........
Me, a name I call myself. . .
(now that's going to be going
through my head all day)
Ha! My nefarious plan worked! <cackle> ;D
Ah, but *I* have an antidote song! Every time I get one of those stupid
songs/jingles stuck in my head, I sing "All We Are" by Warlock to
myself. The stupid song/jingle runs off whimpering.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 09:50:46 AM |
|
|
In article <211020032024403954%fnord2k@yahoo.com>, William Klee says...
In article <YlUkb.24688$cJ5.3809@www.newsranger.com>, Robibnikoff
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
In article <3F93E628.680F131F@wayne.edu>, david asman says...
Robibnikoff wrote:
In article <c9o6pvk9jo1863gvqf4057tkjklpfh4nat@4ax.com>, Michelle Malkin
says...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the
Alphabet
song*
um...is it...um...d?
Doe, a deer, a female deer...
Ray, a drop of golden sun..........
Me, a name I call myself. . .
(now that's going to be going
through my head all day)
Ha! My nefarious plan worked! <cackle> ;D
Ah, but *I* have an antidote song! Every time I get one of those stupid
songs/jingles stuck in my head, I sing "All We Are" by Warlock to
myself. The stupid song/jingle runs off whimpering.
Hmmm, never heard of the band or the song :)
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: a |
22 Oct 2003 11:25:02 AM |
|
|
In article <aPwlb.24925$cJ5.3933@www.newsranger.com>, Robibnikoff
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
In article <211020032024403954%fnord2k@yahoo.com>, William Klee says...
In article <YlUkb.24688$cJ5.3809@www.newsranger.com>, Robibnikoff
<nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
In article <3F93E628.680F131F@wayne.edu>, david asman says...
Robibnikoff wrote:
In article <c9o6pvk9jo1863gvqf4057tkjklpfh4nat@4ax.com>, Michelle Malkin
says...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:18:12 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekiskivviesdo@astroboyskivviesmail.com> wrote:
Michael Nash <nashmj1971@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9418F381E544Fnashmjhotmailcom@216.196.97.132:
Avender@SpamMeNot.com (Bill, The Avender) wrote in
news:3f96fecc.38843963
@newsgroups.bellsouth.net:
In alt.atheism on 18 Oct 2003 22:34:10 -0400,
(shawn) wrote:
a
b
c
um....no, don't tell me! I'll figure it out... *starts humming the
Alphabet
song*
um...is it...um...d?
Doe, a deer, a female deer...
Ray, a drop of golden sun..........
Me, a name I call myself. . .
(now that's going to be going
through my head all day)
Ha! My nefarious plan worked! <cackle> ;D
Ah, but *I* have an antidote song! Every time I get one of those stupid
songs/jingles stuck in my head, I sing "All We Are" by Warlock to
myself. The stupid song/jingle runs off whimpering.
Hmmm, never heard of the band or the song :)
And now you can't come up w/a counter-antidote-song! Bwahahaha!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
