| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Lin Liangtai" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2008 07:32:30 AM |
| Object: |
A building was found on Mars |
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX12P1302R0M1.HTML
.
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
25 Jan 2008 07:10:27 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:52:44 -0800 in
27808163-4d42-4b00-8c79-05ad7abab069@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com, J
Forbes <jforbnospam@selectric.org> wrote:
Lin Liangtai wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at the
top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3 billion years
ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/
r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX12P1302R0M1.HTML
yeah, but it could also be part of the robot that took the picture....
And it is.
Here's the gallery with all the raw images:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit.html
The one Loony Lin is on about is from the "rear hazcam" (not sure what
that is). They're broken up into numbered groups of "Sol xxxx" which I'm
not sure what period of time we're talking about but the lower the
number, the earlier the pictures.
Go back into the 1300s and you start seeing the underside of the rover
more clearly. Such as here:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/
r/1390/2R249762127EFFAWSMP1314L0M1.HTML
(http://tinyurl.com/yqqe4c)
The pictures come from a "Hazcam" of which there are two, one front, one
rear. A millisecond of thought (even this early in the morning) and I
realized we're talking the cameras that watch the ground for, heh,
HAZards. So, yeah, they're down under the main body of the thing, looking
at the ground.
No wonder the loon is posting direct links to isolated pictures. If you
look at the rest, you figure it out pretty fast. Like here:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/
r/1109/2R224820675EFFASMTP1301R0M1.JPG
(http://tinyurl.com/2n8e22)
You can clearly see the camera is underneath some part of the device
itself, looking down, and--in this pic--right at the tracks the rover
made. The whole "curve" thing that's making the loony's favorite pic look
like some "structure" is on the surface is it's a plain old "fisheye"
kinda camera to get a wide field to look for, you know, HAZards. <g>
So this one was even dumber than I thought...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
Evolution is both fact and theory.
Creationism is neither.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. B" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 08:47:03 AM |
|
|
Listen -- this is an atheism NG. There are plenty of alien conspiracy
groups that you could discuss these photographs on.
Or you could see a therapist.
-- B
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
26 Jan 2008 10:31:57 AM |
|
|
On 24 jan, 14:32, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed =A0by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
Or again it might have been done by fairies 3 billion years in the
future.
Just as probable :-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nosterill" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 10:29:39 AM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 1:32 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
I would be fascinated to know the logical path by which the scant
information in that photograph led you to such a specific conclusion.
Really, I would. Please post your reasoning.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 01:02:48 PM |
|
|
In article <f485f9f0-18c9-4524-9b1b-1f673a081151@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> Nosterill <fladgate@hotmail.com> writes:
On Jan 24, 1:32 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
I would be fascinated to know the logical path by which the scant
information in that photograph led you to such a specific conclusion.
Really, I would. Please post your reasoning.
Well, Lin is a BIG fan of Ed Conrad's work, if that gives you
any insight...
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 09:06:01 PM |
|
|
On 1$B7n(B25$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B12$B;~(B29$BJ,(B, Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 24, 1:32 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows abuilding-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
I would be fascinated to know the logical path by which the scant
information in that photograph led you to such a specific conclusion.
Really, I would. Please post your reasoning.
I said in another thread that NASA found remains (actually frozen
mummies) of big mammalian bones. Here is the reason (I will reason or
talk about your question later or in the future): The remains of red
blood cells are CONCAVE. Only mammals have concave cells, which are
called erythrocytes or red blood cells. The diameter of the cells are
much larger than that of modern human's red blood cells, almost like
that of a dinosaur's red blood cells. I wrote an article about
dinosaur's red blood cells and found that dinosaur's red blood cells
had a diameter of 20 to 40 microns. Human's red blood cells are 6 to 8
microns in diameter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nosterill" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
25 Jan 2008 02:33:51 AM |
|
|
On Jan 25, 4:06 am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
On 1$B7n(B25$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B12$B;~(B29$BJ,(B, Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 24, 1:32 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows abuilding-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
I would be fascinated to know the logical path by which the scant
information in that photograph led you to such a specific conclusion.
Really, I would. Please post your reasoning.
I said in another thread that NASA found remains (actually frozen
mummies) of big mammalian bones. Here is the reason (I will reason or
talk about your question later or in the future): The remains of red
blood cells are CONCAVE. Only mammals have concave cells, which are
called erythrocytes or red blood cells. The diameter of the cells are
much larger than that of modern human's red blood cells, almost like
that of a dinosaur's red blood cells. I wrote an article about
dinosaur's red blood cells and found that dinosaur's red blood cells
had a diameter of 20 to 40 microns. Human's red blood cells are 6 to 8
microns in diameter.
Your original post specifically concluded humans and also came up with
an date - 3 billion years. I don't see anything here to support either
of these. This seems to be a case of outrageous extrapolation based on
zero or negligible evidence.
I remember someone - I think it was Carl Sagan - on television,
speculating about the possibilities of life on Venus. He followed a
detailed line of reasoning, essentially that the dense misty
atmosphere could indicate humid swampy conditions that might favour
large reptilian species. Having made this plausible case he then
summarised it all as "Evidence - we can't see anything: Conclusion -
dinosaurs". Your methodology seems to go way beyond that - know
nothing, assume everything.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
25 Jan 2008 07:18:08 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:06:01 -0800 in
d3d2e9b9-bb22-4148-8c17-3f32acf7bc44@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com, Lin
Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
On 1月25日, 上午12時29分, Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 24, 1:32 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows abuilding-like construction at the
top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3 billion
years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/
r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
I would be fascinated to know the logical path by which the scant
information in that photograph led you to such a specific conclusion.
Really, I would. Please post your reasoning.
I said in another thread<SNIP>
Lissen, you could save time and bandwidth if you'd just post, "I'm
insane" and skip proving it to us...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“Democracy is the theory that the common people
know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 11:32:47 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:29:39 -0800 (PST), Nosterill <fladgate@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 24, 1:32 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
I would be fascinated to know the logical path by which the scant
information in that photograph led you to such a specific conclusion.
Really, I would. Please post your reasoning.
We should see this as progress, of a sort.
At least it was "I don't understand it, so MAN diddit."
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
want a free or premium posting account with Teranews?
https://secure.usenetbilling.com/newbilling/manageaccount.cgi?referredby=1089312943&action=Create+New+Account&vendor=teranews
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
25 Jan 2008 07:17:18 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:29:39 -0800 in
f485f9f0-18c9-4524-9b1b-1f673a081151@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com,
Nosterill <fladgate@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 24, 1:32 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at the
top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3 billion years
ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/
r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
I would be fascinated to know the logical path by which the scant
information in that photograph led you to such a specific conclusion.
Really, I would. Please post your reasoning.
Logical? You're funny! <G>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Suppose we've chosen the wrong god? Every time we go to church,
we're just making him madder and madder." -- Homer Simpson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nosterill" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
25 Jan 2008 01:40:28 PM |
|
|
On Jan 25, 1:17=A0pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:29:39 -0800 in
f485f9f0-18c9-4524-9b1b-1f673a081...@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com,
Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 24, 1:32 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at the
top of the picture. It could be constructed =A0by humans 3 billion year=
s
ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/
r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
I would be fascinated to know the logical path by which the scant
information in that photograph led you to such a specific conclusion.
Really, I would. Please post your reasoning.
Logical? You're funny! <G>
Trying to give him the benefit of the doubt? OK. Any hint of a doubt
was extinguished long ago but I did hope that allowing a little
licence might shine a light on what passes for his mental process.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 02:03:29 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 5:32 am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
Maybe it was a UFO. Heh... Little White Men.
--
Uncle Vic
2011
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ken" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars (complete with Fly-by Window) |
24 Jan 2008 11:17:38 AM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 5:32=A0am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
Don't be fooled by NASA's coverup!
It's proof they sold the fast food rights on Mars to the Golden Arches
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars (complete with Fly-by Window) |
02 Feb 2008 11:03:24 AM |
|
|
in article
c7c3225b-7dc5-48a9-8dcf-c52041273678@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com, Ken at
flakey714@aol.com wrote on 1/24/08 11:17 AM:
On Jan 24, 5:32am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
Don't be fooled by NASA's coverup!
It's proof they sold the fast food rights on Mars to the Golden Arches
And we wonder why the martians hate us so.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars (complete with Fly-by Window) |
02 Feb 2008 08:53:01 PM |
|
|
On Feb 3, 1:03=A0am, Tim McGaughy <tee...@toast.net> wrote:
in article
c7c3225b-7dc5-48a9-8dcf-c52041273...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com, Ken at
flakey...@aol.com wrote on 1/24/08 11:17 AM:
On Jan 24, 5:32=A0am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
Don't be fooled by NASA's coverup!
It's proof they sold the fast food rights on Mars to the Golden Arches
And we wonder why the martians hate us so.
I apologize for mistaking the rover parts as a building and lions on
Mars. To compensate for my mistake, I will show you here the really
fossilized penis of Mr. Ed Conrad soon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars (complete with Fly-by Window) |
03 Feb 2008 09:52:07 PM |
|
|
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:648416cc-3269-4ff5-ab87-c1f3bdf6f7a9@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 3, 1:03 am, Tim McGaughy <tee...@toast.net> wrote:
in article
c7c3225b-7dc5-48a9-8dcf-c52041273...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com, Ken at
flakey...@aol.com wrote on 1/24/08 11:17 AM:
On Jan 24, 5:32 am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
Don't be fooled by NASA's coverup!
It's proof they sold the fast food rights on Mars to the Golden Arches
And we wonder why the martians hate us so.
I apologize for mistaking the rover parts as a building and lions on
Mars. To compensate for my mistake, I will show you here the really
fossilized penis of Mr. Ed Conrad soon.
++We would want to see that, why?
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hollis Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 09:42:32 AM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 6:32=A0am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed =A0by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX1...
Actually, it is nowhere near that old. The structure is Mr. Ed
Conrad's vacation home.
There's not much to do out there, of course (Starbucks coming in June,
2012!). Mostly, Ed just sits and daydreams of vast red coal deposits.
HB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 01:32:16 PM |
|
|
On Jan 24, 8:32=A0am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed =A0by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://plancksconstant.org/blog1/images/mars-walmart.jpg
Wow! That's even worse than canals!
Knights of Barsoom, to arms!
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Knight" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 08:42:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:32:30 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX12P1302R0M1.HTML
Holy *****!
It's 7- Eleven and a guy in a turban!
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
25 Jan 2008 11:45:52 PM |
|
|
"Steve Knight" <wooly51@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:03jip3h4dmspf0ov4s9182qn412lp7gbsb@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:32:30 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/r/1440/2R254201111EFFAX12P1302R0M1.HTML
Holy *****!
It's 7- Eleven and a guy in a turban!
Nah. Not 7-11. That guy in a turban is Apu's cousin.
It's a Kwik-E-Mart. Doh!
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: A building was found on Mars |
24 Jan 2008 08:50:39 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:32:30 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA picture shows a building-like construction at
the top of the picture. It could be constructed by humans 3
billion years ago.
Except for the fact that it isn't a building, and there were no humans
on Mars (or anywhere else) 3 billion years ago...
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
