| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
13 Sep 2005 08:01:36 PM |
| Object: |
A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
Since Disaster Dave put out a call for proof of god - which has been
met - I thought I'd challenge him in return to provide proof of this
god of his, using exactly the same terms he demanded. Here it is:
Hi all,
Each time I RESPOND to a claim by someone that god is a fact and is
true, period, they never seem to provide said proof. Rather...
1) They throw out insults.
2) They claim that I just don't understand religion. I am well
educated in various branches of religion. They however, are not and it
upsets them, that
the standard mantra and rhetoric doesn't work.
3) They repeat the claim that there is a "mountain of evidence" for god
and yet, still fail to provide said proof.
4) They paste in web links and claim, "There is your proof!". Yet, the
link provides no such thing and when I ask them to, in their own words,
discuss in detail how it is proof, the silence is deafening.
5) They begin to insult science and claim that religion has disproved
our scientific method. This is done, after their repeated claim that
religion
has no interest in science, nor in the factual.
6) They try to turn the tables, claiming that when I respond to their
positive claim that god is a fact and is true, that it is up to me to
disprove their claim. In other words, they get to say whatever they
want we have to disprove it.
7) They seem to think that the lack of proof is proof.
It's a shame that the people don't know, that this sort of nonsensical
behavior would not be tolerated in science. You claim god is science
and seem to think that providing zero proof, along with insults, is
proof.
God is not science and associating with science in a text book, or by
speech, does not make it science, any more than beer is athletic,
simply because it is sold at football games.
The fact is people, in no branch of science, is a request for evidence
met with insults and silence regarding said proof. Only in god, do we
see this and that should tell us all we need to know.
If it were a genuine god, the proof would have been displayed for all
to see and the opposition would have been silenced, once and for all.
And while they try to blame science for ignorance of "real religion",
the fact is, that the inventor of the religious method was anonymous!
No one knows who it was or what their motives or agenda were, yet
everyone swallows this as gospel!
The fact is, that ignorance was found in religious societies, who
always tend to be far behind in scientific advancement. It is the
scientific nations
that brought knowledge of our universe to where it is today, not
religion and
the great learning institutions, such as Yale, Harvard, etc., were
established to pursue this knowledge, nto wallow in mythology. It is
now, that they have become so assaulted by fundamentlaists, that
education in the USA has gone down in quality. Coincidence?
Absolutely not.
And btw, don't ask me to prove any of this. By YOUR OWN LOGIC, the
burden of proof is on YOU.
So now I make a call to the theists.
"Show me the money!"
Where is the proof of god?
And don't ask me about whether or not theists are lying, or to disprove
it, or paste in web links, etc., etc..
PROVE GOD, OR HAVE THE INTEGRITY TO ADMIT THAT YOU CAN'T!!!
And be ready to discuss, IN YOUR OWN WORDS, HOW AND WHY what you
provide proves what you claim it does. Saying, "scriptures prove it",
is not proof, unless you can show which exact texts and why and how
they prove what you claim and be able to respond to a rebuttal.
If you can't do that, then IT IS YOU who "DOESN'T understand science".
Even paul knew that the scientific evidence wasn't there, to support a
resurrection and so, he revived mythology and repackaged it in
a non-Jewish version, called, "Christianity".
You have one camp of theists who know that Judaism did not change and
another camp that knows that sudden religious changes do occur. They
both disprove each other and yet, it never occurs to them, that maybe
they're both wrong. Maybe neither happened.
So stop with the "what stops it from happening" garbage and show the
proof of god.
And don't bother me with the "religion doesn't work that way" garbage
either. I know that, but you don't, or you wouldn't be making the
claims you do. Thus, your approach is anti-science, from go.
You claim it's true, without a doubt. This is something that is not to
be doubted and only a fool would and so, it requires ABSOLUTE PROOF
THAT LEAVES ABSOLUTELY ZERO ROOM FOR DOUBT!!!
So cough up the proof for god and shut us all up. If you can, then I
will throw my "Ancestor's Tale" away and renounce my science.
And don't tell me it has nothing to do with me renouncing my science,
when we all know that you spend your time trashing Christianity and
claiming that "the dead hand of science" has hampered religion.
So where is it? We're all waiting. And as I said, make sure that you
can back it up, with references that you can defend, in detail, in your
own words.
I will not entertain any sidetracking, nor any questions. This is
about answers. YOUR answers, as evolutionists, PROVING BEYOND ANY
DOUBT that god is reality.
I am ready. Are you?
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "Melchizedek" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 10:32:09 AM |
|
|
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1126659696.122004.275650@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Since Disaster Dave put out a call for proof of god - which has been
met - I thought I'd challenge him in return to provide proof of this
god of his, using exactly the same terms he demanded. Here it is:
Hi all,
Each time I RESPOND to a claim by someone that god is a fact and is
true, period, they never seem to provide said proof. Rather...
1) They throw out insults.
2) They claim that I just don't understand religion. I am well
educated in various branches of religion. They however, are not and it
upsets them, that
the standard mantra and rhetoric doesn't work.
3) They repeat the claim that there is a "mountain of evidence" for god
and yet, still fail to provide said proof.
4) They paste in web links and claim, "There is your proof!". Yet, the
link provides no such thing and when I ask them to, in their own words,
discuss in detail how it is proof, the silence is deafening.
5) They begin to insult science and claim that religion has disproved
our scientific method. This is done, after their repeated claim that
religion
has no interest in science, nor in the factual.
6) They try to turn the tables, claiming that when I respond to their
positive claim that god is a fact and is true, that it is up to me to
disprove their claim. In other words, they get to say whatever they
want we have to disprove it.
7) They seem to think that the lack of proof is proof.
It's a shame that the people don't know, that this sort of nonsensical
behavior would not be tolerated in science. You claim god is science
and seem to think that providing zero proof, along with insults, is
proof.
God is not science and associating with science in a text book, or by
speech, does not make it science, any more than beer is athletic,
simply because it is sold at football games.
The fact is people, in no branch of science, is a request for evidence
met with insults and silence regarding said proof. Only in god, do we
see this and that should tell us all we need to know.
If it were a genuine god, the proof would have been displayed for all
to see and the opposition would have been silenced, once and for all.
And while they try to blame science for ignorance of "real religion",
the fact is, that the inventor of the religious method was anonymous!
No one knows who it was or what their motives or agenda were, yet
everyone swallows this as gospel!
The fact is, that ignorance was found in religious societies, who
always tend to be far behind in scientific advancement. It is the
scientific nations
that brought knowledge of our universe to where it is today, not
religion and
the great learning institutions, such as Yale, Harvard, etc., were
established to pursue this knowledge, nto wallow in mythology. It is
now, that they have become so assaulted by fundamentlaists, that
education in the USA has gone down in quality. Coincidence?
Absolutely not.
And btw, don't ask me to prove any of this. By YOUR OWN LOGIC, the
burden of proof is on YOU.
So now I make a call to the theists.
"Show me the money!"
Where is the proof of god?
And don't ask me about whether or not theists are lying, or to disprove
it, or paste in web links, etc., etc..
PROVE GOD, OR HAVE THE INTEGRITY TO ADMIT THAT YOU CAN'T!!!
And be ready to discuss, IN YOUR OWN WORDS, HOW AND WHY what you
provide proves what you claim it does. Saying, "scriptures prove it",
is not proof, unless you can show which exact texts and why and how
they prove what you claim and be able to respond to a rebuttal.
If you can't do that, then IT IS YOU who "DOESN'T understand science".
Even paul knew that the scientific evidence wasn't there, to support a
resurrection and so, he revived mythology and repackaged it in
a non-Jewish version, called, "Christianity".
You have one camp of theists who know that Judaism did not change and
another camp that knows that sudden religious changes do occur. They
both disprove each other and yet, it never occurs to them, that maybe
they're both wrong. Maybe neither happened.
So stop with the "what stops it from happening" garbage and show the
proof of god.
And don't bother me with the "religion doesn't work that way" garbage
either. I know that, but you don't, or you wouldn't be making the
claims you do. Thus, your approach is anti-science, from go.
You claim it's true, without a doubt. This is something that is not to
be doubted and only a fool would and so, it requires ABSOLUTE PROOF
THAT LEAVES ABSOLUTELY ZERO ROOM FOR DOUBT!!!
So cough up the proof for god and shut us all up. If you can, then I
will throw my "Ancestor's Tale" away and renounce my science.
And don't tell me it has nothing to do with me renouncing my science,
when we all know that you spend your time trashing Christianity and
claiming that "the dead hand of science" has hampered religion.
So where is it? We're all waiting. And as I said, make sure that you
can back it up, with references that you can defend, in detail, in your
own words.
I will not entertain any sidetracking, nor any questions. This is
about answers. YOUR answers, as evolutionists, PROVING BEYOND ANY
DOUBT that god is reality.
I am ready. Are you?
Budikka
:
Recommended commentaries: http://lulu.com/bibleweb/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 05:07:07 PM |
|
|
Melchizedek wrote:
Recommended commentaries: http://lulu.com/bibleweb/
When you know the Bible as well as I do, then you can pretend you
belong in this thread.
Buh-bye now, little crazy one.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 07:00:12 PM |
|
|
*HIS* "ELECT" *WROTE*:
*HOW* "WELL" *DO* "YOU" *KNOW* "THE" *BIBLE*???
"HAVE" *A* "NICE" *DAY*...
"HIS" *ELECT*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hannele Huigens" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
15 Sep 2005 04:32:01 PM |
|
|
Op Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:00:12 +0200 schreef <his_elect_07@yahoo.com>:
*HIS* "ELECT" *WROTE*:
*HOW* "WELL" *DO* "YOU" *KNOW* "THE" *BIBLE*???
"HAVE" *A* "NICE" *DAY*...
"HIS" *ELECT*
Know what? As soon as you start to write without all caps and asterisks, I
might try to read what you post.
--
Hannele Huigens
aa #2221
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
15 Sep 2005 06:32:55 PM |
|
|
*HIS* "ELECT" *WROTE*:
*KNOW* "WHAT"??? "IF" *YOU* "STOP" *BEING* "SO" *BIASED* "TOWARDS"
*THE* "WAYS" *OF* "OTHERS" *WE* "WOULDN'T" *HAVE* "TO" *BE*
"ADDRESSING" *SOME* "OF" *THESE* "ISSUES" *THAT* "ARE" *GOING* "ON"
*TODAY* "AS" *THE* "PEOPLE" *WOULD* "BE" *MORE* "PEACEFUL" *AND*
"RESPECTFUL" *TOWARDS* "THEIR" *NEIGHBORS*!!! "UNDERSTAND"???
*I* "CHOSE" *THIS* "STYLE" *BECAUSE* "I" *WANTED* "TO" *SEE* "HOW"
*MANY* "CHRISTIANS" *WOULD* "BECOME" *BIASED* "TOWARDS" *ME* "SO"
*THAT* "I" *COULD* "PROVE" *ONCE* "AGAIN" *HOW* "PREJUDICED" *OTHERS*
"ARE" *TO* "THOSE" *WHO* "HAVE" *NOT* "DONE" *ANYTHING* "HARMFUL"
*TOWARDS* "THEM"!!!
Main Entry: 1prej=B7u=B7dice Pronunciation: 'pre-j&-d&sFunction:
nounEtymology: Middle English, from Old French, from Latin praejudicium
previous judgment, damage, from prae- + judicium judgment -- more at
JUDICIAL 1 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of
another in disregard of one's rights; especially : detriment to one's
legal rights or claims
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or
leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b :
an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of
hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their
supposed characteristics
*THIS* "IS" *EXACTLY* "THE" *CONDUCT* "I" *AM* "TRYING" *TO* "STOP"
*AS* "IT" *IS* "THESE" *ACTS* "THAT" *ARE* "CAUSING" *THE* "PEOPLE"
*OF* "EARTH" *TO* "KILL" *AND* "DESTROY" *THE* "GOODNESS" *RIGHT* "OUT"
*OF* "THIS" *LIFE*!!! "WHEN" *THE* "PEOPLE" *SEE* "THAT" *THE*
"BETTER" *THAN* "THOUS" *AND* "THE" *LESSER* "THAN" *THOUS* "ARE"
*SUPPOSED* "TO" *BE* "EQUAL" *TO* "EACH" *OTHER* "WE" *WILL* "ALL"
*LIVE* "IN" *A* "HAPPIER" *AND* "PEACEFUL" *WORLD*!!!
*I* "BID" *ALL* "PEACE"...
"HIS" *ELECT*
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 12:05:47 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:32:09 -0400, "Melchizedek"
<Melchizedek@as-if.com> spake thusly:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1126659696.122004.275650@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Since Disaster Dave put out a call for proof of god - which has been
met - I thought I'd challenge him in return to provide proof of this
god of his, using exactly the same terms he demanded. Here it is:
Hi all,
Each time I RESPOND to a claim by someone that god is a fact and is
true, period, they never seem to provide said proof. Rather...
1) They throw out insults.
2) They claim that I just don't understand religion. I am well
educated in various branches of religion. They however, are not and it
upsets them, that
the standard mantra and rhetoric doesn't work.
3) They repeat the claim that there is a "mountain of evidence" for god
and yet, still fail to provide said proof.
4) They paste in web links and claim, "There is your proof!". Yet, the
link provides no such thing and when I ask them to, in their own words,
discuss in detail how it is proof, the silence is deafening.
5) They begin to insult science and claim that religion has disproved
our scientific method. This is done, after their repeated claim that
religion
has no interest in science, nor in the factual.
6) They try to turn the tables, claiming that when I respond to their
positive claim that god is a fact and is true, that it is up to me to
disprove their claim. In other words, they get to say whatever they
want we have to disprove it.
7) They seem to think that the lack of proof is proof.
It's a shame that the people don't know, that this sort of nonsensical
behavior would not be tolerated in science. You claim god is science
and seem to think that providing zero proof, along with insults, is
proof.
God is not science and associating with science in a text book, or by
speech, does not make it science, any more than beer is athletic,
simply because it is sold at football games.
The fact is people, in no branch of science, is a request for evidence
met with insults and silence regarding said proof. Only in god, do we
see this and that should tell us all we need to know.
If it were a genuine god, the proof would have been displayed for all
to see and the opposition would have been silenced, once and for all.
And while they try to blame science for ignorance of "real religion",
the fact is, that the inventor of the religious method was anonymous!
No one knows who it was or what their motives or agenda were, yet
everyone swallows this as gospel!
The fact is, that ignorance was found in religious societies, who
always tend to be far behind in scientific advancement. It is the
scientific nations
that brought knowledge of our universe to where it is today, not
religion and
the great learning institutions, such as Yale, Harvard, etc., were
established to pursue this knowledge, nto wallow in mythology. It is
now, that they have become so assaulted by fundamentlaists, that
education in the USA has gone down in quality. Coincidence?
Absolutely not.
And btw, don't ask me to prove any of this. By YOUR OWN LOGIC, the
burden of proof is on YOU.
So now I make a call to the theists.
"Show me the money!"
Where is the proof of god?
And don't ask me about whether or not theists are lying, or to disprove
it, or paste in web links, etc., etc..
PROVE GOD, OR HAVE THE INTEGRITY TO ADMIT THAT YOU CAN'T!!!
And be ready to discuss, IN YOUR OWN WORDS, HOW AND WHY what you
provide proves what you claim it does. Saying, "scriptures prove it",
is not proof, unless you can show which exact texts and why and how
they prove what you claim and be able to respond to a rebuttal.
If you can't do that, then IT IS YOU who "DOESN'T understand science".
Even paul knew that the scientific evidence wasn't there, to support a
resurrection and so, he revived mythology and repackaged it in
a non-Jewish version, called, "Christianity".
You have one camp of theists who know that Judaism did not change and
another camp that knows that sudden religious changes do occur. They
both disprove each other and yet, it never occurs to them, that maybe
they're both wrong. Maybe neither happened.
So stop with the "what stops it from happening" garbage and show the
proof of god.
And don't bother me with the "religion doesn't work that way" garbage
either. I know that, but you don't, or you wouldn't be making the
claims you do. Thus, your approach is anti-science, from go.
You claim it's true, without a doubt. This is something that is not to
be doubted and only a fool would and so, it requires ABSOLUTE PROOF
THAT LEAVES ABSOLUTELY ZERO ROOM FOR DOUBT!!!
So cough up the proof for god and shut us all up. If you can, then I
will throw my "Ancestor's Tale" away and renounce my science.
And don't tell me it has nothing to do with me renouncing my science,
when we all know that you spend your time trashing Christianity and
claiming that "the dead hand of science" has hampered religion.
So where is it? We're all waiting. And as I said, make sure that you
can back it up, with references that you can defend, in detail, in your
own words.
I will not entertain any sidetracking, nor any questions. This is
about answers. YOUR answers, as evolutionists, PROVING BEYOND ANY
DOUBT that god is reality.
I am ready. Are you?
Budikka
:
Recommended commentaries: http://lulu.com/bibleweb/
This was a man who could not provide proof of what
he claimed is true and so, he is using what he and
other evolutionists did in that thread and pretending
that Christians did that to him.
The fact is, Christians don't claim to be able to put
God in a test tube. Evolutionists claim that what
they believe is "science" and ridicule anyone who
doesn't believe as they do, while at the same time,
trying to wiggle out of it and claiming that they never
said it was absolutely true.
That's why I kill filed him. He is just seeking to
mock Christians and he's targeting me, because
he's mad at me, because I exposed their hypocrisy.
I haven't seen these books yet, btw. Thanks for
the link. :)
--
Pastor Dave
Don't put a question mark where God put a period.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 05:35:33 PM |
|
|
Pastor Dave wrote:
This was a man who could not provide proof of what
he claimed is true
That this is a lie is demonstrated here:
http://tinyurl.com/dxqjc
I asked you in your own thread to define what you would accept as proof
and promised I would provide it. **YOU RAN AWAY**.
I asked you in your own thread to answer a couple of questions so I
could better deliver the evidence you demanded. **YOU RAN AWAY**.
I gave you overwhleming evidence in your own thread of macroevolution.
**YOU RAN AWAY**.
The fact is, Christians don't claim to be able to put
God in a test tube.
All that this clueless comment reveals is how little you've studied
your own "kind".
Evolutionists claim that what
they believe is "science"
It's not belief, it's what the massive weight of evidence dictates.
This has been explained to you time after time after time after time,
but you're either too blindly arrogant or too fundamentally stupid to
grasp it.
This proves that you're a liar in claiming you understand science. You
do not and you expose that ignorance in every sentence you write.
The Theory of Evoltuion is based on **PRECISELY** the same scientific
process as every other branch of science and is better supported than
many other fields about which the creationists have nothing whatsoever
to say.
and ridicule anyone who
doesn't believe as they do,
No, unlike you, we respect the beliefs of others. The only ones we
ridicule are morons like you who pontificate assininely on a topic
about which they demonstrably have not the flimsiest grasp, idiots who
demand a science "prove" something, yet when massive walls of solid
evidence are repeatedly pushed in front of you, you're too stupid or
too blind to see them.
while at the same time,
trying to wiggle out of it and claiming that they never
said it was absolutely true.
Fine comment from the liar who is wriggling out of even so much as
offering evidence there's a god. What a hypocrite to demand it of
evolutionists and ignore the evidence they provide, and then wriggle
out of it himself in a thread which uses **PRECISELY** his own
arguments turned agianst him! This is too delicious.
And you are, of course, a liar. I never did wriggle out of anything.
I gave youe verythign you asked for and **YOU RAN AWAY**!
I've given you mountains of evidence and told you where to find more,
and I've done this repeatedly. And here you are again, dishonestly
opening a thread claiming that no one ever showed you any evidence when
the truth is you will not accept any evidence no matter what it is.
Nor will you even help others to get you the evidence you pretend will
convince you by answering some simple non-controversial questions.
People ask you for guidance and **YOU RUN AWAY**.
Is that what Jesus would do?
You're a liar and a fraud and not fit to be called a Christian, let
alone a Pastor
Do you want the URLs to prove your cowardice, you little weasel? I got
'em.
That's why I kill filed him.
Cowardice! Did Jesus ever killfile anyone? Did he you weasel?
You're nothing but a limp Peter at the passion. Always have been,
always will be.
He is just seeking to
mock Christians and he's targeting me, because
he's mad at me, because I exposed their hypocrisy.
Ha ha ha ha ha! Do you do stand up? No, that's impossible, you don't
have anything that will stand up.
Mocking Christians? How am I mocking Christians when the thread has
**YOUR** name on it, you liar? I'm mocking your impotence, no one
else's. I'm mocking your hypocrisy, no one else's. I'm mocking your
lies, no one else's. I'm mocking your cowardice, no one else's.
I'm not the one regularly going into believer's threads and trying to
stir them up and trash them. *YOU* are the one doing that in reverse.
Do you seriously believe that your kindergarten-level lies are believed
in by fellow Christians?
And what was *your* thread about if it wasn't a calculated attempt at
mockery of evolutionists, you pathetic hypocrite?
Targeting you? This from the weasel who repeatedly targets
evolutionists? This from the moron who makes a full-time job out of
illustrating that he doesn't understand the meaning of "turn the other
cheek" and "do unto others as you will be done by?"! What a pathetic
joke you are. People like you are the reason Jesus wept.
I haven't bothered with you in a long time, but you're getting the
finger now, so expect to see me around every corner in a.a. for a
while, re-exposing your lies and cowardice until you're slapped back
into the hole you dared creep from after the last time I slapped you
into it.
When you come blundering into a.a. with your ridiculous challenges and
sneering insults, you mess with all of us, and I for one will never let
you or any other moron post vile insults and fraudlent challenges in
a.a. without slamming you for it. You don't like it? Keep your
idiotic trash out of a.a. Get it now?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 05:17:36 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:32:09 -0400, "Melchizedek"
<Melchizedek@as-if.com> wrote:
Aaaarggghhhh...
Smeg head's back.
<plonk>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas W. Thomas" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
13 Sep 2005 08:35:46 PM |
|
|
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1126659696.122004.275650@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Since Disaster Dave put out a call for proof of god - which has been
met - I thought I'd challenge him in return to provide proof of this
god of his, using exactly the same terms he demanded. Here it is:
Hi all,
Each time I RESPOND to a claim by someone that god is a fact and is
true, period, they never seem to provide said proof. Rather...
1) They throw out insults.
2) They claim that I just don't understand religion. I am well
educated in various branches of religion. They however, are not and it
upsets them, that
the standard mantra and rhetoric doesn't work.
3) They repeat the claim that there is a "mountain of evidence" for god
and yet, still fail to provide said proof.
4) They paste in web links and claim, "There is your proof!". Yet, the
link provides no such thing and when I ask them to, in their own words,
discuss in detail how it is proof, the silence is deafening.
5) They begin to insult science and claim that religion has disproved
our scientific method. This is done, after their repeated claim that
religion
has no interest in science, nor in the factual.
6) They try to turn the tables, claiming that when I respond to their
positive claim that god is a fact and is true, that it is up to me to
disprove their claim. In other words, they get to say whatever they
want we have to disprove it.
7) They seem to think that the lack of proof is proof.
It's a shame that the people don't know, that this sort of nonsensical
behavior would not be tolerated in science. You claim god is science
and seem to think that providing zero proof, along with insults, is
proof.
God is not science and associating with science in a text book, or by
speech, does not make it science, any more than beer is athletic,
simply because it is sold at football games.
The fact is people, in no branch of science, is a request for evidence
met with insults and silence regarding said proof. Only in god, do we
see this and that should tell us all we need to know.
If it were a genuine god, the proof would have been displayed for all
to see and the opposition would have been silenced, once and for all.
And while they try to blame science for ignorance of "real religion",
the fact is, that the inventor of the religious method was anonymous!
No one knows who it was or what their motives or agenda were, yet
everyone swallows this as gospel!
The fact is, that ignorance was found in religious societies, who
always tend to be far behind in scientific advancement. It is the
scientific nations
that brought knowledge of our universe to where it is today, not
religion and
the great learning institutions, such as Yale, Harvard, etc., were
established to pursue this knowledge, nto wallow in mythology. It is
now, that they have become so assaulted by fundamentlaists, that
education in the USA has gone down in quality. Coincidence?
Absolutely not.
And btw, don't ask me to prove any of this. By YOUR OWN LOGIC, the
burden of proof is on YOU.
So now I make a call to the theists.
"Show me the money!"
Where is the proof of god?
And don't ask me about whether or not theists are lying, or to disprove
it, or paste in web links, etc., etc..
PROVE GOD, OR HAVE THE INTEGRITY TO ADMIT THAT YOU CAN'T!!!
And be ready to discuss, IN YOUR OWN WORDS, HOW AND WHY what you
provide proves what you claim it does. Saying, "scriptures prove it",
is not proof, unless you can show which exact texts and why and how
they prove what you claim and be able to respond to a rebuttal.
If you can't do that, then IT IS YOU who "DOESN'T understand science".
Even paul knew that the scientific evidence wasn't there, to support a
resurrection and so, he revived mythology and repackaged it in
a non-Jewish version, called, "Christianity".
You have one camp of theists who know that Judaism did not change and
another camp that knows that sudden religious changes do occur. They
both disprove each other and yet, it never occurs to them, that maybe
they're both wrong. Maybe neither happened.
So stop with the "what stops it from happening" garbage and show the
proof of god.
And don't bother me with the "religion doesn't work that way" garbage
either. I know that, but you don't, or you wouldn't be making the
claims you do. Thus, your approach is anti-science, from go.
You claim it's true, without a doubt. This is something that is not to
be doubted and only a fool would and so, it requires ABSOLUTE PROOF
THAT LEAVES ABSOLUTELY ZERO ROOM FOR DOUBT!!!
So cough up the proof for god and shut us all up. If you can, then I
will throw my "Ancestor's Tale" away and renounce my science.
And don't tell me it has nothing to do with me renouncing my science,
when we all know that you spend your time trashing Christianity and
claiming that "the dead hand of science" has hampered religion.
So where is it? We're all waiting. And as I said, make sure that you
can back it up, with references that you can defend, in detail, in your
own words.
I will not entertain any sidetracking, nor any questions. This is
about answers. YOUR answers, as evolutionists, PROVING BEYOND ANY
DOUBT that god is reality.
I am ready. Are you?
Budikka
This one will be fun......
Doug
.
|
|
|
| User: "navi-gater" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
13 Sep 2005 11:30:06 PM |
|
|
"Douglas W. Thomas" <douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in
news:AemdnZyUZuXh47renZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@comcast.com:
<snip>
This one will be fun......
Doug
I doubt that. I try and take eveyone at face value until they give me cause
to do otherwise.
Talking to the "Pastor" is much like talking to your own echo and expecting
a conversation to develop....
gater.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas W. Thomas" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
13 Sep 2005 11:46:43 PM |
|
|
"navi-gater" <gater@the-gate.net> wrote in message
news:Xns96D151F41FA4thegatenet@207.69.189.191...
"Douglas W. Thomas" <douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in
news:AemdnZyUZuXh47renZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@comcast.com:
<snip>
This one will be fun......
Doug
I doubt that. I try and take eveyone at face value until they give me
cause
to do otherwise.
Talking to the "Pastor" is much like talking to your own echo and
expecting
a conversation to develop....
gater.
Actually, I expect PD to coward out and not respond to budikka at all.
Doug
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 01:47:34 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:43 -0600, "Douglas W. Thomas"
<douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> spake thusly:
"navi-gater" <gater@the-gate.net> wrote in message
news:Xns96D151F41FA4thegatenet@207.69.189.191...
"Douglas W. Thomas" <douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in
news:AemdnZyUZuXh47renZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@comcast.com:
<snip>
This one will be fun......
Doug
I doubt that. I try and take eveyone at face value until they give me
cause
to do otherwise.
Talking to the "Pastor" is much like talking to your own echo and
expecting
a conversation to develop....
gater.
Actually, I expect PD to coward out and not respond to budikka at all.
Actually, you expect to find as many ways as you can to
insult me.
He is kill filed. He did not respond directly to a
post that I sent him, but rather, in his last post
that I saw, dodged the issue and attacked me
personally. But hey, making smart ***** remarks
and ignoring what I actually say, is something
that you admit to doing. I can quote you admitting
it here, if you wish. It doesn't surprise me that
you would appreciate that type of behavior. After
all, you're a good Christians, right?
Let's see if YOU run away from the challenge that
I issued to YOU. Of course, you will find an excuse
and then claim here, that I ran away. <chuckle>
--
Pastor Dave
Don't put a question mark where God put a period.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 04:59:39 PM |
|
|
Pastor Dave wrote:
He is kill filed. He did not respond directly to a
post that I sent him, but rather, in his last post
that I saw, dodged the issue and attacked me
personally.
You're a goddamned liar. I've responded to multiple posts in your
"macroevolution" thread and you've **RUN AWAY** from **EVERY SINGLE ONE
OF THEM** last I checked.
But let's call you bluff. What's the URL to the message you claim I
haven't responded? What's the date and time the message shows it was
posted?
I'm not done in that thread yet, so rest assured I'll get to every
single one of your cowardly lies before I'm through.
But hey, making smart ***** remarks
and ignoring what I actually say, is something
that you admit to doing.
You have run away from every single message I left,so your blatant,
desperate and pathetic lies serve no purpose other than to confirm what
a congenital liar you truly are.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "WCB" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 06:00:22 AM |
|
|
Pastor Dave wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:43 -0600, "Douglas W. Thomas"
<douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> spake thusly:
"navi-gater" <gater@the-gate.net> wrote in message
news:Xns96D151F41FA4thegatenet@207.69.189.191...
"Douglas W. Thomas" <douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in
news:AemdnZyUZuXh47renZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@comcast.com:
<snip>
This one will be fun......
Doug
I doubt that. I try and take eveyone at face value until they give me
cause
to do otherwise.
Talking to the "Pastor" is much like talking to your own echo and
expecting
a conversation to develop....
gater.
Actually, I expect PD to coward out and not respond to budikka at all.
Actually, you expect to find as many ways as you can to
insult me.
He is kill filed. He did not respond directly to a
post that I sent him, but rather, in his last post
that I saw, dodged the issue and attacked me
personally. But hey, making smart ***** remarks
and ignoring what I actually say, is something
that you admit to doing. I can quote you admitting
it here, if you wish. It doesn't surprise me that
you would appreciate that type of behavior. After
all, you're a good Christians, right?
Let's see if YOU run away from the challenge that
I issued to YOU. Of course, you will find an excuse
and then claim here, that I ran away. <chuckle>
OMNIPOTENCE AND OMNISCIENCE
A. Omnipotence is a special sort of attribute, of all god's alledged
attributes the most important. Because from that attribute you can
derive others attributes, including omniscience. If you say for
purposes of argument god is omnipotent, you are also implying
god is also omniscient.
B. If god is omnipotent, god must also have omniscience because
if he does not have omniscience, that destroys omnipotence
as a claimed attribute.
C. Thus if god is omnipotent, and created all, free will is impossible
because creation and omniscience rule out free will as was shown.
In this world god supposedly created, evil exists. So god must not
be omnibenevolent as claimed.
D. So omnipotence and omnibenevolence are thus mutually exclusive
in a world that does in fact have evil in it.
Because omniscience must exist as part of omnipotence and omniscience
and creatorhood cannot coexist with free will, omnipotence is also not
compatible with creatorhood and omnibenevolence.
One cannot finesse this all by ignoring omniscience or abandoning
omniscience.
E. One can only dispose of omniscience by also explicitly
abandoning omnipotence.
F. One may be tempted to abandon the idea god created all.
But that has some very strong logical problems also.
G. If god is omnipotent, he can create all. Or modify any other
creation he does not himself create. No other being or process
may create something god could not modify, by the power of
his omniscience.
H. So if for purposes of argument, we claim the Universe was
not created by god, he could, being omnipotent, change
that creation for his own purposes.
We are back to the problem of evil again, he could change
creation such that no evil John Smiths can exist.
If not he then is sole and only cause for existance of all evil.
I. If evil exists because god could change the Universe he did not
create, and he fails to do so, then all evil exists solely because
of knowing and personal choices god makes.
J. God being omnipotent cannot be controlled by any other process or
other entities. He may modify anty works or creations made by them.
K. Omnipotence and creatorhood thus are entangled in a manner
that makes it hard to abandon the doctrine god created all.
PRE-EXISTING MATTER AND A PRE-EXISTING UNIVERSE.
The Greek writer Hesiod in his Theogony, starts with a Universe that
is a chaotic void. This void, through the mysterious property of
emanation, created the first generation of gods, the Titans, who in
their turn created the Olympians gods who eventually displace the
Titans as rulers of the world.
Likewise, some theologians see Genesis as representing god creating
the world out of a similar void, a primordial sea god did not himself
create, but used as raw material for his creations.
God's existance is not explained.
This idea god did not create all still would not absolve an omnipotent
god from responsibility for evil. The biblical god if he did not create
the Universe and its component materials used them as he pleased. If
that god is omnipotent, then he bears all responsibilty for the world he
did create out of pre-existing material. Whether this god is said
to be eternal or like Hesiod's Titans was somehow emanated from the
chaos of the void does not materially change any arguments involving
omnipotence, omniscience or omnibenevolence, if god is said to have
these attributes.
--
"Today the official spokesman for the Foxes
agreed an investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed."
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "robin hood zorrro" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
15 Sep 2005 07:04:52 PM |
|
|
WCB (on "Omniscience and Omnipotence")
B. If god is omnipotent, god must also have omniscience because
if he does not have omniscience, that destroys omnipotence
as a claimed attribute.
C. Thus if god is omnipotent, and created all, free will is impossible
because creation and omniscience rule out free will as was shown.
In this world god supposedly created, evil exists. So god must not
be omnibenevolent as claimed.
D. So omnipotence and omnibenevolence are thus mutually exclusive
in a world that does in fact have evil in it.
Because omniscience must exist as part of omnipotence and omniscience
and creatorhood
You are getting away from mathematics here.
You are presupposing things like the existence of evil. Thus you have
intentionally created the conflict.
If God is all that exists and "evil" is defined as something that is
the opposite of God... then evil does not exist.
There are many who see the teachings of Jesus as having to do with that
very lesson... thus Jesus was healing disease by proving that it did
not exist, Jesus was raising from the dead by proving that death did
not exist...
eg: Jesus using the phrase "Get behind me Satan" meaning: get out of
my sight, leave my view because I already know you are the illusion of
that which I know does not exist, that hypothetical thing which is not
God and therfore does not exist.
Then of course a question of "What is reality?" and "What is
'existence'?" et al become very significant. etc. etc. etc.
.
|
|
|
| User: "navi-gater" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
15 Sep 2005 11:27:05 PM |
|
|
"robin hood zorrro" <robinhoodzorrro@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1126829092.930200.198610@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
You are getting away from mathematics here.
You are presupposing things like the existence of evil. Thus you have
intentionally created the conflict.
If God is all that exists and "evil" is defined as something that is
the opposite of God... then evil does not exist.
And yet, by the definition of evil actions in the bible, we observe
daily that evil does in fact exist...
There are many who see the teachings of Jesus as having to do with
that
very lesson... thus Jesus was healing disease by proving that it did
not exist, Jesus was raising from the dead by proving that death did
not exist...
Well jesus was not terribly well informed since both of these are
observed facts....
eg: Jesus using the phrase "Get behind me Satan" meaning: get out of
my sight, leave my view because I already know you are the illusion of
that which I know does not exist, that hypothetical thing which is not
God and therfore does not exist.
Don't let the doctors know - they'll be out of job as everyone just
ignores there various illnesses and even death....
Then of course a question of "What is reality?" and "What is
'existence'?" et al become very significant. etc. etc. etc.
These are always interesting questions....
If you're a christain though, these questions are not important - if
your view is constrained by the bible, then the assumption must be god
made it that way.
gater.
.
|
|
|
| User: "robin hood" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
21 Sep 2005 01:36:43 PM |
|
|
oops sorry I did not see this response:
If God is all that exists and "evil" is defined as something that is
the opposite of God... then evil does not exist.
And yet, by the definition of evil actions in the bible, we observe
daily that evil does in fact exist...
The Bible is a teaching tool, particularly the Old Testament.
It is not proof of the existence or non-existence of evil.
The logical proof that evil does not exist is that God is all that
exists.. <-- there is much more to be said here.
The Bible's illustrations of evil then is various lessons concerning
how these mistaken concepts are to be overcome.
Jesus is the prime teacher in this.
.
|
|
|
| User: "navi-gater" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
21 Sep 2005 09:41:16 PM |
|
|
"robin hood" <robinhoodzorro@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1127327803.345817.266840@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
oops sorry I did not see this response:
If God is all that exists and "evil" is defined as something that is
the opposite of God... then evil does not exist.
And yet, by the definition of evil actions in the bible, we observe
daily that evil does in fact exist...
The Bible is a teaching tool, particularly the Old Testament.
What does it teach exactly?
Seems to me the lessons are a) If you commit "evil" acts you get
punished by god b) do good and you might be ok (if god will overlook
that Adam + Eve business that is).
It is not proof of the existence or non-existence of evil.
It defines acts which are "evil" - those acts are perpetrated today (the
consumption of pork, adultery, murder etc). In the book, people
commiting these acts are punished by god.
Therefore evil (as defined in the book) exists today.
The logical proof that evil does not exist is that God is all that
exists.. <-- there is much more to be said here.
That is your fantasy - but by your logic no one can possibly go to hell
or commit a sin, since god is all that exists (and god is apprently not
evil - I have my doubts)
If you remember you started this little sub-thread with a supposed
"logical proof" for the existence of god.
Your proof was flawed.
This stuff is your fantasy - not proof.
The Bible's illustrations of evil then is various lessons concerning
how these mistaken concepts are to be overcome.
What mistaken concepts?
Jesus is the prime teacher in this.
Jesus is a) Not in the old testament and b) in direct opposition to some
of the "lessons" taught in the old testament.
I think you're on firmer ground (believe it or not) with the "proof" of
god - let's leave the bible guessing for another time....
gater.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas W. Thomas" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
14 Sep 2005 02:03:54 PM |
|
|
You can't disprove evolution. Neither can I.
"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:tlhfi1hcu4m19o3960lush2n6apgjrbsbm@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:46:43 -0600, "Douglas W. Thomas"
<douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> spake thusly:
"navi-gater" <gater@the-gate.net> wrote in message
news:Xns96D151F41FA4thegatenet@207.69.189.191...
"Douglas W. Thomas" <douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in
news:AemdnZyUZuXh47renZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@comcast.com:
<snip>
This one will be fun......
Doug
I doubt that. I try and take eveyone at face value until they give me
cause
to do otherwise.
Talking to the "Pastor" is much like talking to your own echo and
expecting
a conversation to develop....
gater.
Actually, I expect PD to coward out and not respond to budikka at all.
Actually, you expect to find as many ways as you can to
insult me.
He is kill filed. He did not respond directly to a
post that I sent him, but rather, in his last post
that I saw, dodged the issue and attacked me
personally. But hey, making smart ***** remarks
and ignoring what I actually say, is something
that you admit to doing. I can quote you admitting
it here, if you wish. It doesn't surprise me that
you would appreciate that type of behavior. After
all, you're a good Christians, right?
Let's see if YOU run away from the challenge that
I issued to YOU. Of course, you will find an excuse
and then claim here, that I ran away. <chuckle>
--
Pastor Dave
Don't put a question mark where God put a period.
I didn't expect you to confront him........totally....
Doug
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P. Boatwright" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
01 Oct 2005 09:19:07 PM |
|
|
Douglas W. Thomas wrote:
You can't disprove evolution. Neither can I.
God's word disproves evolution.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
01 Oct 2005 09:43:51 PM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet John P. Boatwright (name@For-
God.net) made the light shine upon us with this:
Douglas W. Thomas wrote:
You can't disprove evolution. Neither can I.
God's word disproves evolution.
Backwards. Evolution disproves god's word. And there's actual evidence
for evolution. Got any for your god?
Why do you deny reality?
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Because Boaty sez so.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
http://home.comcast.net/~vickman/
Plonked by Raytard
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P. Boatwright" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
02 Oct 2005 12:59:15 AM |
|
|
Uncle Vic wrote:
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet John P. Boatwright (name@For-
God.net) made the light shine upon us with this:
Douglas W. Thomas wrote:
You can't disprove evolution. Neither can I.
God's word disproves evolution.
Backwards. Evolution disproves god's word. And there's actual evidence
for evolution. Got any for your god?
Buddika confirmed that evolution is a CRACKPOT theory.
Buddika pointed out that AIDS is now benign, and
his claimed science backing it up... voided the
previous science claims of AIDS being a major killer
virus now... disproving evolution does anything...
.... at all.
"Evolution does nothing at all, it's a proven fact,
solid scientific evidence proves this." - Buddika, 2005
ha ha ha...
Way too funny.
Why do you deny reality?
Buddika told me what the atheist's evolution reality is,
and it's clearly bunk... garbage... crap.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Because Boaty sez so.
God said so.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "navi-gater" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
02 Oct 2005 09:58:35 PM |
|
|
"John P. Boatwright" <name@For-God.net> wrote in
news:433F75CF.3AA4@For-God.net:
Buddika confirmed that evolution is a CRACKPOT theory.
Buddika pointed out that AIDS is now benign, and
his claimed science backing it up... voided the
previous science claims of AIDS being a major killer
virus now... disproving evolution does anything...
AIDS has changed - so it has evolved. Good proof - well done.
gater.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: A CALL FOR PASTOR DAVE TO PROVIDE PROOF OF GOD |
02 Oct 2005 12:49:45 PM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet John P. Boatwright
(name@For-God.net) made the light shine upon us with this:
Buddika told me what the atheist's evolution reality is,
and it's clearly bunk... garbage... crap.
This is clearly a lie. But I guess since you are bearing false witness for
Jesus, then it is OK. Right?
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
http://home.comcast.net/~vickman/
Plonked by Raytard
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: DOUG: THE EVOLUTION MAN |
14 Sep 2005 02:42:24 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:03:54 -0600, "Douglas W. Thomas"
<douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> spake thusly:
You can't disprove evolution. Neither can I.
Well, Doug, thanks for telling us what YOU believe.
--
Pastor Dave
Don't put a question mark where God put a period.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: THE EVOLUTION MAN |
14 Sep 2005 03:13:41 PM |
|
|
"Pastor Dave" <1news-group-mail1@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:18vgi1pg8i3b8m1gc7alb9afvr2ktaldpb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:03:54 -0600, "Douglas W. Thomas"
<douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> spake thusly:
You can't disprove evolution. Neither can I.
Well, Doug, thanks for telling us what YOU believe.
Nym-shifting scumbag <spit!> Re-PLONK
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: THE EVOLUTION MAN |
15 Sep 2005 12:05:30 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:13:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> spake thusly:
"Pastor Dave" <1news-group-mail1@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:18vgi1pg8i3b8m1gc7alb9afvr2ktaldpb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:03:54 -0600, "Douglas W. Thomas"
<douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> spake thusly:
You can't disprove evolution. Neither can I.
Well, Doug, thanks for telling us what YOU believe.
Nym-shifting scumbag <spit!> Re-PLONK
It's a good thing atheists are so loving and tolerant.
--
Pastor Dave
Don't put a question mark where God put a period.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: THE EVOLUTION MAN |
15 Sep 2005 03:10:05 PM |
|
|
In <aeaji1tmdvd00abg06aeclthko5g4j1nqp@4ax.com>, Pastor Dave
<1news-group-mail1@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:13:41 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> spake thusly:
"Pastor Dave" <1news-group-mail1@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
message news:18vgi1pg8i3b8m1gc7alb9afvr2ktaldpb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:03:54 -0600, "Douglas W. Thomas"
<douglas.w.thomas@NOSPAMcomcast.net> spake thusly:
You can't disprove evolution. Neither can I.
Well, Doug, thanks for telling us what YOU believe.
Nym-shifting scumbag <spit!> Re-PLONK
It's a good thing atheists are so loving and tolerant.
Translation: "I got caught being a nym-shifting scumbag."
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: THE EVOLUTION MAN |
18 Sep 2005 01:25:11 PM |
|
|
Pastor Dave wrote:
It's a good thing atheists are so loving and tolerant.
Funny but I never saw any atheists hanging witches, never saw them
slaughtering arabs in crusades, never saw them fighting in Northern
Ireland or in the phillippines, never saw them blowing up anti-abortion
clinics.
Meanwhile, here's the evidence for so-called macroevolution I
personally provided on three occasions with more to come:
http://tinyurl.com/dxqjc
http://tinyurl.com/b5sjn
http://tinyurl.com/82oh3
Your response? **YOU RAN AWAY**!
But by all means go ahead and killfile everyone who shows you up for
the liar, fraud, cheat, hypocrite and coward that you are, then you can
keep your cosy little empty gossamer religion wrapped cosily around
you.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: THE EVOLUTION MAN |
19 Sep 2005 01:01:53 PM |
|
|
In <1127067911.803478.157570@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Budikka666"
<budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Pastor Dave wrote:
It's a good thing atheists are so loving and tolerant.
Funny but I never saw any atheists hanging witches, never saw them
slaughtering arabs in crusades, never saw them fighting in Northern
Ireland or in the phillippines, never saw them blowing up anti-abortion
clinics.
Meanwhile, here's the evidence for so-called macroevolution I personally
provided on three occasions with more to come: http://tinyurl.com/dxqjc
http://tinyurl.com/b5sjn
http://tinyurl.com/82oh3
Your response? **YOU RAN AWAY**!
Wow. That's never happened before!
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|