| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"bob&carole" |
| Date: |
18 Sep 2006 09:55:58 AM |
| Object: |
A John Mark Karr wannabe |
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice in who teaches their
children.
How can you trust a man who just shows up one day dressed as a woman to
instill correct moral values in your kids and to be a good role model?
Talk about confusion for the students!
No, they don't have to allow this 'disabled' person to school their
children, moving to another school district will correct this travesty
to perfection.
What's next, will they tell us we must allow John Mark Karr to teach
our kids?
After all, he inquired about a sex change in Thailand............
Kids Must Take Classes from Transsexual Teacher
by Wendy Cloyd, assistant
A male teacher has returned to a New York state school this year
dressed as a female-- and students have been told they must accept him
as a her.
A New York state science teacher who taught for nine years as a man
returned to Batavia High School this year dressed as a woman, and
parents have been told their children can't transfer out of class.
The City of Batavia School District has not disclosed the name of the
teacher, citing medical privacy laws. But officials have said the
teacher has begun hormone therapy in advance of a sex-change operation
and will dress as a woman and be addressed as such this year.
In a school district Power Point presentation to parents and students,
they were told that the teacher had Gender-Identity Disorder (GID) -- a
chronic medical condition occurring in 1 in every 11,000 males and 1 in
every 30,000 females.
According to officials, GID is defined as a disability under New York's
Human Rights Law and is protected from discrimination. School rules
support the law and forbid harassment based on someone's disability.
Those with GID, parents and students were told, have a strong,
persistent cross-gender identification that, if untreated, "saps energy
from all meaningful activities, including teaching."
Treatment, they said, meant allowing the person with GID to become the
gender he/she feels he/she should be.
"For persons with GID, gender transition is seen as a problem by
others," one of the Power Point slides says. "But for the individual
with GID, it is the solution."
Dr. Bill Maier, psychologist in residence for Focus on the Family, said
that allowing the teacher to now show up as a woman is not the
solution.
"Many leading medical and psychiatric experts," he said, "believe that
Gender- Identity Disorder is a psychiatric condition that should be
treated with psychotherapy, not surgery."
WROC-TV reported Wednesday that five parents requested to have their
students moved to another class, but Superintendent Richard Stutzman
denied the requests, saying they did not meet district requirements.
Maier said that while school officials in Batavia are right to express
compassion for the troubled teacher, they have no right to blatantly
ignore the moral objections of parents in their district.
"This case in New York, and the outrageous 'sexual minority
indoctrination' legislation recently passed by the California State
Legislature, should be a wake-up call to America's parents," he said.
"In many school districts in this country, 'tolerance' has an ominous
new definition -- the forced acceptance of behavior that is clearly
pathological."
.
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
18 Sep 2006 11:03:54 AM |
|
|
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole444@hotmail.com> wrote in message
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice in who teaches their
children.
How can you trust a man who just shows up one day dressed as a woman to
instill correct moral values in your kids and to be a good role model?
Talk about confusion for the students!
Meanwhile there's a nationwide manhunt 'cause some fucked up heterosexual
***** with a mustache stole and infant baby. What's next?
What's next, will they tell us we must allow John Mark Karr to teach our
kids?
He's under charges for sex offenses. So, no. You can crawl out from under
your bed now.
-c
.
|
|
|
| User: "Society" |
|
| Title: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
19 Sep 2006 12:37:38 AM |
|
|
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed. And I'm suspicious of women who
cross-dress too.
Meanwhile there's a nationwide manhunt 'cause
some fucked up heterosexual ***** with a mustache
stole and infant baby. What's next?
Uh, more Two Wrongs Make a Right excuse-making
from a pinko leftist like you? That's "what's next"?
--
All excuses for the self- and socially-destructive Left,
including its Ladies Auxiliary called Feminism, depend
on censorship of reality to appear plausible to the rubes,
boobs, and graduates of clown colleges that swallow
such tripe.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
19 Sep 2006 03:18:03 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:37:38 -0700, "Society"
<Society@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed. And I'm suspicious of women who
cross-dress too.
Meanwhile there's a nationwide manhunt 'cause
some fucked up heterosexual ***** with a mustache
stole and infant baby. What's next?
Uh, more Two Wrongs Make a Right excuse-making
from a pinko leftist like you? That's "what's next"?
Inability to recognize sarcasm noted.
But keep trying, Skippy. Maybe someday you'll actually be smarter than
a doorknob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
19 Sep 2006 05:32:52 AM |
|
|
John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> writes:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:37:38 -0700, "Society"
<Society@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed. And I'm suspicious of women who
cross-dress too.
Meanwhile there's a nationwide manhunt 'cause
some fucked up heterosexual ***** with a mustache
stole and infant baby. What's next?
Uh, more Two Wrongs Make a Right excuse-making
from a pinko leftist like you? That's "what's next"?
Inability to recognize sarcasm noted.
But keep trying, Skippy. Maybe someday you'll actually be smarter than
a doorknob.
You're obviously an optimist. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
19 Sep 2006 07:38:33 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:37:38 -0700, in alt.atheism , "Society"
<Society@feminism.is.invalid> in <12gv126o0jp20bf@corp.supernews.com>
wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed. And I'm suspicious of women who
cross-dress too.
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing? Taste, fashion, sure. But morality does not, IMHO,
seem involved.
[snip]
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
19 Sep 2006 08:38:39 PM |
|
|
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
What more needs said?
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 02:47:13 PM |
|
|
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in message
news:zY0Qg.7580$8e5.4027@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
What more needs said?
<SHRIEK!!!!>
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 08:50:01 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote:
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
<SHRIEK!!!!>
Damn, woman! <pops eardrums> What are you? Part banshee?
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 10:24:10 PM |
|
|
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in news:ddmQg.10280
$t73.7142@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com:
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Dionisio" <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote:
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
<SHRIEK!!!!>
Damn, woman! <pops eardrums> What are you? Part banshee?
She needs to rename herself "Screechypoo"
--
Doc Smartass
The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of
words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the
people who must use the words. - Philip K. *****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
19 Sep 2006 09:10:32 PM |
|
|
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in news:zY0Qg.7580$8e5.4027
@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
Damn you. *squinty*
--
Doc Smartass
The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of
words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people
who must use the words. - Philip K. *****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
19 Sep 2006 10:29:45 PM |
|
|
Doc Smartass wrote:
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
Damn you. *squinty*
<Slips Smartass a 35-cents-off coupon for Clorox Bleach.>
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 10:33:26 PM |
|
|
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in news:JA2Qg.7587$8e5.7485
@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com:
Doc Smartass wrote:
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
Damn you. *squinty*
<Slips Smartass a 35-cents-off coupon for Clorox Bleach.>
Probably better if I guzzle a bottle of "Wild Irish Rose" red.
Might even be worth the horrible post-hangover hangover that stuff's
supposed to cause.
http://www.bumwine.com/wildirishrose.html
Dig the cartoon devolution on the home page!
--
Doc Smartass
The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of
words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the
people who must use the words. - Philip K. *****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "655321" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 09:25:39 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns9843D76B71C1Aaskifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>,
Doc Smartass <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in news:zY0Qg.7580$8e5.4027
@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
Damn you. *squinty*
Fine.
*Don't* picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
In fact, try with all your might *not* to picture Rush Limbaugh in a
lace teddy.
This might help: Picture ***** Cheney in a lace teddy instead.
--
655321
"Heed the message served with every Republican banquet speech -- that the
private interest precedes the public interest, that money is good for rich
people, bad for poor people -- and who can say that the war in Iraq has proven
to be anything other than the transformation of a godforsaken desert into a
defense contractor's Garden of Eden?" -- Lewis Lapham
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 10:25:37 PM |
|
|
655321 <DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com> wrote in
news:DipthotDipthot-28D1C3.19253420092006@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com:
In article <Xns9843D76B71C1Aaskifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>,
Doc Smartass <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in
news:zY0Qg.7580$8e5.4027 @tornado.ohiordc.rr.com:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
Damn you. *squinty*
Fine.
*Don't* picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
In fact, try with all your might *not* to picture Rush Limbaugh in a
lace teddy.
This might help: Picture ***** Cheney in a lace teddy instead.
Double-damn you, with any two Bush guys in black leather dominatrix/sub
costumes!! *double-squinty*
--
Doc Smartass
The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of
words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the
people who must use the words. - Philip K. *****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 09:27:44 PM |
|
|
In News DipthotDipthot-28D1C3.19253420092006@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,,
655321 at DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com, typed this:
In article <Xns9843D76B71C1Aaskifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>,
Doc Smartass <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> wrote in
news:zY0Qg.7580$8e5.4027 @tornado.ohiordc.rr.com:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
Damn you. *squinty*
Fine.
*Don't* picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
I can barely stand the sight of the ugly drug addict when he's in a business
suit.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. – Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Emily Plath" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 03:29:14 PM |
|
|
Dionisio wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
What more needs said?
Nothing. Now you're liable for damages, I'll need: a new monitor and
keyboard, a tin of Jeye's Fluid, and a replacement grande Pumpkin Spice
latte (once the vomitting spell passes).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
19 Sep 2006 11:53:12 PM |
|
|
Dionisio wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
<insert vomit sounds>
What more needs said?
I need your lawyers info to sue you for mental cruelty! :P
--
+========= L. Michael Roberts - Goderich, Ontario, Canada ===========+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail or your public PGP key
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
19 Sep 2006 10:28:56 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:38:39 GMT, in alt.atheism , Dionisio
<moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> in
<zY0Qg.7580$8e5.4027@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com> wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
What more needs said?
It was immoral for you to suggest that as it caused serious pain. But
for him to do it is simply an aesthetic catastrophe.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers |
20 Sep 2006 08:47:49 PM |
|
|
Matt Silberstein wrote:
Dionisio <moc-rr-thgisniTA@5ellimd.com> in wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing?
Picture Rush Limbaugh in a lace teddy.
What more needs said?
It was immoral for you to suggest that as it caused serious pain.
Hey, you asked...
;-)
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
19 Sep 2006 09:40:49 AM |
|
|
Matt Silberstein wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:37:38 -0700, in alt.atheism , "Society"
<Society@feminism.is.invalid> in <12gv126o0jp20bf@corp.supernews.com>
wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed. And I'm suspicious of women who
cross-dress too.
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing? Taste, fashion, sure. But morality does not, IMHO,
seem involved.
A 'man' {and I use the term lightly} that dresses like a woman, takes
it up the ***** and certainlyis *not* the role model Parents would prefer
for their children.
Not to mention the obvious distraction in the classroom.
I can see the teasing now:
"No I don't have my homework, Miss Prison *****"
How long before she/it pulls a Debra Lafave?
Hopefully it's not teaching Sex Ed..............
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
19 Sep 2006 03:24:12 PM |
|
|
"bobandcarole" <bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158676849.789934.77350@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
A 'man' {and I use the term lightly} that dresses like a woman, takes
it up the ***** and certainlyis *not* the role model Parents would prefer
for their children.
Dude, seriously....neither are you.
I can see the teasing now:
"No I don't have my homework, Miss Prison *****"
Sounds like you have no grasp for child discipline. Most adults teach their
children better than to call their
teacher a "*****."
-c
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
19 Sep 2006 12:45:33 PM |
|
|
On 19 Sep 2006 07:40:49 -0700, in alt.atheism , "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> in
<1158676849.789934.77350@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:37:38 -0700, in alt.atheism , "Society"
<Society@feminism.is.invalid> in <12gv126o0jp20bf@corp.supernews.com>
wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed. And I'm suspicious of women who
cross-dress too.
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing? Taste, fashion, sure. But morality does not, IMHO,
seem involved.
A 'man' {and I use the term lightly} that dresses like a woman, takes
it up the ***** and certainlyis *not* the role model Parents would prefer
for their children.
As it happens there are plenty of cross-dressing males who are not gay
and plenty of straight non-cross-dressing males who "take it up the
*****". So, again, what is the *moral* issue involved?
Not to mention the obvious distraction in the classroom.
Ah, distractions. How is that a moral issue?
I can see the teasing now:
"No I don't have my homework, Miss Prison *****"
How long before she/it pulls a Debra Lafave?
Hopefully it's not teaching Sex Ed..............
Your attempt to treat humans as things is noted. I consider that
horribly immoral.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
20 Sep 2006 03:17:29 PM |
|
|
bobandcarole wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:37:38 -0700, in alt.atheism , "Society"
<Society@feminism.is.invalid> in <12gv126o0jp20bf@corp.supernews.com>
wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed. And I'm suspicious of women who
cross-dress too.
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing? Taste, fashion, sure. But morality does not, IMHO,
seem involved.
A 'man' {and I use the term lightly} that dresses like a woman, takes
it up the ***** and certainlyis *not* the role model Parents would prefer
for their children.
I dressed a sa woman once, in college. A couple of us went round
looking really stupid with a bucket, inviting people to hand over
money. We raised =A3300, and it all went to charity, so, while I made a
fool of myself (intentionally, i might add), it was worth it.
Not to mention the obvious distraction in the classroom.
I can see the teasing now:
"No I don't have my homework, Miss Prison *****"
How long before she/it pulls a Debra Lafave?
=20
Hopefully it's not teaching Sex Ed..............
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Emily Plath" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
20 Sep 2006 03:42:00 PM |
|
|
bobandcarole wrote:
Matt Silberstein wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:37:38 -0700, in alt.atheism , "Society"
<Society@feminism.is.invalid> in <12gv126o0jp20bf@corp.supernews.com>
wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed. And I'm suspicious of women who
cross-dress too.
I am confused, what is the moral issue involved in a man wearing
women's clothing? Taste, fashion, sure. But morality does not, IMHO,
seem involved.
A 'man' {and I use the term lightly} that dresses like a woman, takes
it up the ***** and certainlyis *not* the role model Parents would prefer
for their children.
Osprey seems to think he is.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Emily Plath" |
|
| Title: Re: no excuses for cross-dressers (was: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
19 Sep 2006 12:53:23 PM |
|
|
Society wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:KrzPg.899$Ka1.418@news01.roc.ny...
"bob&carole" explained...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice
in who teaches their children. How can you trust
a man who just shows up one day dressed as
a woman to instill correct moral values in your kids
and to be a good role model? Talk about confusion
for the students!
Agreed.
Osprey will be very disappointed by this. (He's a *former*
cross-dresser.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
18 Sep 2006 12:03:10 PM |
|
|
gatt wrote:
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole444@hotmail.com> wrote in message
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice in who teaches their
children.
How can you trust a man who just shows up one day dressed as a woman to
instill correct moral values in your kids and to be a good role model?
Talk about confusion for the students!
Meanwhile there's a nationwide manhunt 'cause some fucked up heterosexual
***** with a mustache stole and infant baby. What's next?
You might consider spelling lessons?
What's next, will they tell us we must allow John Mark Karr to teach our
kids?
He's under charges for sex offenses. So, no. You can crawl out from under
your bed now.
-c
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
18 Sep 2006 12:43:25 PM |
|
|
In article <1158591357.939652.169570@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole444@hotmail.com> wrote:
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice in who teaches their
children.
they do. haven't you ever heard of a private school?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
18 Sep 2006 07:54:06 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole444@hotmail.com> wrote:
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice in who teaches their
children.
they do. haven't you ever heard of a private school?
Rumor has it that he considers "private" schools something perverse.
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole" |
|
| Title: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
18 Sep 2006 02:10:44 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <1158591357.939652.169570@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole444@hotmail.com> wrote:
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice in who teaches their
children.
they do. haven't you ever heard of a private school?
Absolutely, all of my children attended private school.
The advantages are tremendous...
Better Education
No ghetto trash
No Tranny Teachers.
But it would be a cold day in hell before I allowed my children to be
near a SheHe freak, let alone be taught by one...bottom line
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: A John Mark Karr wannabe |
18 Sep 2006 02:21:40 PM |
|
|
"bob&carole" <bobandcarole100@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158606644.286340.37830@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
This is outrageous, Parents should have a choice in who teaches their
children.
they do. haven't you ever heard of a private school?
Absolutely, all of my children attended private school.
The advantages are tremendous...
Hopefully the educators there are doing a better job with your children than
yours did with you. Who says "Parents should have a choice in who teaches
their children" and then admits that they already do?
But it would be a cold day in hell before I allowed my children to be
near a SheHe freak, let alone be taught by one...bottom line
Nobody will miss your children, so it works out fine.
-c
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
