| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"afterlifeevidece" |
| Date: |
22 Feb 2006 12:59:50 PM |
| Object: |
A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why people
believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence ....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
.
|
|
| User: "Mike Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
22 Feb 2006 09:28:07 PM |
|
|
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote:
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested
in why people believe in the afterlife this presents much
of the evidence ....
People believe in an afterlife because
A) they were taught to believe it, and
B) wishful thinking.
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
"Swedenborg was also a very highly gifted
clairvoyant who spent more than twenty years
investigating other dimensions."
Hoo boy...
__________________________________________
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
Mike Smith | aa #1164 | Founder of SMASH
__________________________________________
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
"Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an evil
eye, neither desire thou his dainty meats." - Pr.23:6
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dougal McDougal of that Elk" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
22 Feb 2006 10:57:52 PM |
|
|
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com> wrote in
message news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why people
believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence ....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
Should anybody believe what a Lawyer says?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
23 Feb 2006 02:16:44 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:57:52 +1300, "Dougal McDougal of that Elk"
<FU2@yahoo.co.zpc> wrote:
- Refer: <hhbLf.152081$vH5.1332915@news.xtra.co.nz>
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com> wrote in
message news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why people
believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence ....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
Should anybody believe what a Lawyer says?
Yes, but always the exact opposite.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
24 Feb 2006 11:47:42 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:46:44 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:57:52 +1300, "Dougal McDougal of that Elk"
<FU2@yahoo.co.zpc> wrote:
- Refer: <hhbLf.152081$vH5.1332915@news.xtra.co.nz>
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com> wrote in
message news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why people
believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence ....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
Should anybody believe what a Lawyer says?
Yes, but always the exact opposite.
But that's what Lawyers want you to think...... ;)
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lizz Holmans" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
24 Feb 2006 01:08:07 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:47:42 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:46:44 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
wnload
Should anybody believe what a Lawyer says?
Yes, but always the exact opposite.
But that's what Lawyers want you to think...... ;)
I have a nephew that's a lawyer, but we don't talk about it.
Lizz 'well, every family has to have a dark grey sheep (1)' Holmans
(1) As it should be no surprise to anyone that knows me, I'm the ebony
Strong Wool Merino in *my* family.
--
Rumpeta, rumpeta, rumpeta
.
|
|
|
| User: "george" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
24 Feb 2006 01:27:21 PM |
|
|
Lizz Holmans wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:47:42 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:46:44 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
wnload
Should anybody believe what a Lawyer says?
Yes, but always the exact opposite.
But that's what Lawyers want you to think...... ;)
I have a nephew that's a lawyer, but we don't talk about it.
Lizz 'well, every family has to have a dark grey sheep (1)' Holmans
(1) As it should be no surprise to anyone that knows me, I'm the ebony
Strong Wool Merino in *my* family.
Ah You're the Australian black sheep of your mob then :-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
25 Feb 2006 10:01:10 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:08:07 +0000, Lizz Holmans
<dillo@jackalope.demon.co.uk> wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:47:42 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:46:44 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
wnload
Should anybody believe what a Lawyer says?
Yes, but always the exact opposite.
But that's what Lawyers want you to think...... ;)
I have a nephew that's a lawyer, but we don't talk about it.
Understood, the 'polite company' thing..... ;)
Lizz 'well, every family has to have a dark grey sheep (1)' Holmans
(1) As it should be no surprise to anyone that knows me, I'm the ebony
Strong Wool Merino in *my* family.
'Funny' how often that happens muttons the black ram.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puck Greenman" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
25 Feb 2006 03:17:00 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:01:10 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:08:07 +0000, Lizz Holmans
<dillo@jackalope.demon.co.uk> wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:47:42 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:46:44 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
wnload
Should anybody believe what a Lawyer says?
Yes, but always the exact opposite.
But that's what Lawyers want you to think...... ;)
I have a nephew that's a lawyer, but we don't talk about it.
Understood, the 'polite company' thing..... ;)
Lizz 'well, every family has to have a dark grey sheep (1)' Holmans
(1) As it should be no surprise to anyone that knows me, I'm the ebony
Strong Wool Merino in *my* family.
'Funny' how often that happens muttons the black ram.
Not your average mutton, then?
<Puck/ Ducking, and taking it on his toes; At a very high rate of knots.>
--
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
27 Feb 2006 12:16:50 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:17:00 GMT, Puck Greenman
<sidhe@the.hollow.hills.fey> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:01:10 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:08:07 +0000, Lizz Holmans
<dillo@jackalope.demon.co.uk> wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:47:42 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:46:44 +1030, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
wnload
Should anybody believe what a Lawyer says?
Yes, but always the exact opposite.
But that's what Lawyers want you to think...... ;)
I have a nephew that's a lawyer, but we don't talk about it.
Understood, the 'polite company' thing..... ;)
Lizz 'well, every family has to have a dark grey sheep (1)' Holmans
(1) As it should be no surprise to anyone that knows me, I'm the ebony
Strong Wool Merino in *my* family.
'Funny' how often that happens muttons the black ram.
Not your average mutton, then?
Not at all says Jeff.....
<Puck/ Ducking, and taking it on his toes; At a very high rate of knots.>
Knotty Knotty.....
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
25 Feb 2006 06:13:11 AM |
|
|
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com> wrote in
message news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why people
believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence ....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
Oh wow!
A lawyer?!
it *must* be true
I'm so totally convinced now!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
22 Feb 2006 02:25:29 PM |
|
|
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com> wrote in
message news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why people
believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence ....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick J." |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
22 Feb 2006 02:29:11 PM |
|
|
Oh man, a *lawyer*! There's NOBODY more trustworthy than that, so it
*must* be the truth! Pull the other one, why don'tcha. It's got bells
on it :P
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
22 Feb 2006 05:35:45 PM |
|
|
on 22 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in message
news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Official alt.wisdom HELLBOY
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
23 Feb 2006 10:58:14 AM |
|
|
"Uncle Vic" <address@withheld.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97729EA3759CCvicman@216.196.97.142...
on 22 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in message
news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
24 Feb 2006 11:36:22 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:58:14 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Uncle Vic" <address@withheld.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97729EA3759CCvicman@216.196.97.142...
on 22 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in message
news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
24 Feb 2006 11:57:25 AM |
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:d0huv1lbbrpbolbrjri54ppukaf5e4ueme@4ax.com...
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:58:14 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Uncle Vic" <address@withheld.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97729EA3759CCvicman@216.196.97.142...
on 22 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in message
news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
Oh phooey! ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
24 Feb 2006 12:37:28 PM |
|
|
on 24 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
Oh phooey! ;)
Kablooey!
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Official alt.wisdom HELLBOY
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
25 Feb 2006 09:57:03 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:37:28 -0600, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
on 24 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
Oh phooey! ;)
Kablooey!
Is that Chop Suey?
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lorrill Buyens" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
25 Feb 2006 05:28:19 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:37:28 -0600, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>, Loyal
Agent of the sci.skeptic Illuminati, gifted us with these words of wisdom:
on 24 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
Oh phooey! ;)
Kablooey!
Who took my chop suey?
--
"One does wonder why God went to the trouble of making Man
rational, since there's evidently no bloody use for reason
whatsoever."
- Alan Hope, in a religious discussion in misc.writing
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puck Greenman" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
26 Feb 2006 01:23:01 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:28:19 -0700, Lorrill Buyens <buyensl@interlacken.com> wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:37:28 -0600, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>, Loyal
Agent of the sci.skeptic Illuminati, gifted us with these words of wisdom:
on 24 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
Oh phooey! ;)
Kablooey!
Who took my chop suey?
This thread is screwy
--
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
27 Feb 2006 11:59:50 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:23:01 GMT, Puck Greenman
<sidhe@the.hollow.hills.fey> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:28:19 -0700, Lorrill Buyens <buyensl@interlacken.com> wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:37:28 -0600, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>, Loyal
Agent of the sci.skeptic Illuminati, gifted us with these words of wisdom:
on 24 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
Oh phooey! ;)
Kablooey!
Who took my chop suey?
This thread is screwy
but is it chewie?
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
27 Feb 2006 04:11:33 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:36:22 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:58:14 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Uncle Vic" <address@withheld.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97729EA3759CCvicman@216.196.97.142...
on 22 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in message
news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
While he ate chop suey and listened to Frank Zappa's Dynamo humm <sp?> rhyme on
angora.
Ben
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
28 Feb 2006 09:56:05 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:11:33 -0500, Ben Kaufman
<spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:36:22 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:58:14 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Uncle Vic" <address@withheld.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97729EA3759CCvicman@216.196.97.142...
on 22 Feb 2006 in alt.atheism, dear sweet Robibnikoff
(witchypoo@broomstick.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in message
news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
My, what a nice crock of hooey.
Nice and gooey hooey?
You betcha, Louey ;)
shouted dewey
While he ate chop suey and listened to Frank Zappa's Dynamo humm <sp?> rhyme on
angora.
[oooooooooooooo good tune]
while deflowering Flora!
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "R. Pierce Butler" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
22 Feb 2006 05:54:29 PM |
|
|
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com> wrote in
news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com:
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why people
believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence ....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
The chapter citing Einstein's formula E=Mc2 is so utterly wrong it defies
description. That chapter alone is such a profound demonstration of pure
ignorance and stupidity that I find myself embarrassed for him.
I think that attoney is an alumni of the Francis E. Dec Memorial School of
Law.
pierce
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
22 Feb 2006 08:28:54 PM |
|
|
In <Xns9772B64007B54mc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce Butler"
<spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com> wrote
in news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com:
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why people
believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence ....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
The chapter citing Einstein's formula E=Mc2 is so utterly wrong it defies
description. That chapter alone is such a profound demonstration of pure
ignorance and stupidity that I find myself embarrassed for him.
I love how he notes that conversion of mass to energy is what makes nukes
go off but still proposes that for "materialization" and
"dematerialization" of people and things.
So the first time one person dematerialized, the atmosphere is ripped off
the planet...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
Churches are closing...
http://makeashorterlink.com/?M611110AC
Mardi Gras is rolling...
http://www.nola.com/mardigras/
Now, what was this about god's judgement?
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Pierce Butler" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
22 Feb 2006 09:52:53 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2MidnVG05bV7gGDeRVn-qw@megapath.net:
In <Xns9772B64007B54mc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce Butler"
<spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com:
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
The chapter citing Einstein's formula E=Mc2 is so utterly wrong it
defies description. That chapter alone is such a profound
demonstration of pure ignorance and stupidity that I find myself
embarrassed for him.
I love how he notes that conversion of mass to energy is what makes
nukes go off but still proposes that for "materialization" and
"dematerialization" of people and things.
So the first time one person dematerialized, the atmosphere is ripped
off the planet...
That attorney reminds me of a letter that was sent to the physics
deprtment of an Ivy League school I worked at a few years ago. This
letter was framed and placed on permanent display. The letter was from a
M.D. and he stated in his letter that he had proven the existence of the
lumineferous ether. He went on to claim that Mikelson and Morley had done
it wrong all those times before. It was funny yet sad.
pierce
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
23 Feb 2006 07:53:25 AM |
|
|
In <Xns9772DEAB7F5CBmc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce Butler"
<spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2MidnVG05bV7gGDeRVn-qw@megapath.net:
In <Xns9772B64007B54mc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce Butler"
<spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com:
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
The chapter citing Einstein's formula E=Mc2 is so utterly wrong it
defies description. That chapter alone is such a profound
demonstration of pure ignorance and stupidity that I find myself
embarrassed for him.
I love how he notes that conversion of mass to energy is what makes
nukes go off but still proposes that for "materialization" and
"dematerialization" of people and things.
So the first time one person dematerialized, the atmosphere is ripped
off the planet...
That attorney reminds me of a letter that was sent to the physics
deprtment of an Ivy League school I worked at a few years ago. This
letter was framed and placed on permanent display. The letter was from a
M.D. and he stated in his letter that he had proven the existence of the
lumineferous ether. He went on to claim that Mikelson and Morley had done
it wrong all those times before. It was funny yet sad.
I actually love crankery. True insanity is *such a *great find.
This Zammit, though? Not entertaining at *all...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
Churches are closing...
http://makeashorterlink.com/?M611110AC
Mardi Gras is rolling...
http://www.nola.com/mardigras/
Now, what was this about god's judgement?
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Pierce Butler" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
23 Feb 2006 09:33:13 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:-5adnfaub9_LI2DenZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@megapath.net:
In <Xns9772DEAB7F5CBmc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce Butler"
<spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2MidnVG05bV7gGDeRVn-qw@megapath.net:
In <Xns9772B64007B54mc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce
Butler" <spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com:
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
The chapter citing Einstein's formula E=Mc2 is so utterly wrong it
defies description. That chapter alone is such a profound
demonstration of pure ignorance and stupidity that I find myself
embarrassed for him.
I love how he notes that conversion of mass to energy is what makes
nukes go off but still proposes that for "materialization" and
"dematerialization" of people and things.
So the first time one person dematerialized, the atmosphere is ripped
off the planet...
That attorney reminds me of a letter that was sent to the physics
deprtment of an Ivy League school I worked at a few years ago. This
letter was framed and placed on permanent display. The letter was from
a M.D. and he stated in his letter that he had proven the existence of
the lumineferous ether. He went on to claim that Mikelson and Morley
had done it wrong all those times before. It was funny yet sad.
I actually love crankery. True insanity is *such a *great find.
This Zammit, though? Not entertaining at *all...
For a real crank, have you ever read the rants of Fracis E. Dec?
Priceless!!!
pierce
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
23 Feb 2006 12:01:55 PM |
|
|
In <Xns9773612ED3887mc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce Butler"
<spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:-5adnfaub9_LI2DenZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@megapath.net:
In <Xns9772DEAB7F5CBmc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce Butler"
<spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2MidnVG05bV7gGDeRVn-qw@megapath.net:
In <Xns9772B64007B54mc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce
Butler" <spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com:
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
The chapter citing Einstein's formula E=Mc2 is so utterly wrong it
defies description. That chapter alone is such a profound
demonstration of pure ignorance and stupidity that I find myself
embarrassed for him.
I love how he notes that conversion of mass to energy is what makes
nukes go off but still proposes that for "materialization" and
"dematerialization" of people and things.
So the first time one person dematerialized, the atmosphere is ripped
off the planet...
That attorney reminds me of a letter that was sent to the physics
deprtment of an Ivy League school I worked at a few years ago. This
letter was framed and placed on permanent display. The letter was from
a M.D. and he stated in his letter that he had proven the existence of
the lumineferous ether. He went on to claim that Mikelson and Morley
had done it wrong all those times before. It was funny yet sad.
I actually love crankery. True insanity is *such a *great find.
This Zammit, though? Not entertaining at *all...
For a real crank, have you ever read the rants of Fracis E. Dec?
Priceless!!!
Communist Gangster Computer God?
Oh my.
Hey, who's this Communist Atheist Conspiracy bunch??? Damn splitters!!
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
Churches are closing...
http://makeashorterlink.com/?M611110AC
Mardi Gras is rolling...
http://www.nola.com/mardigras/
Now, what was this about god's judgement?
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Pierce Butler" |
|
| Title: Re: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife |
23 Feb 2006 05:07:39 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:XrqdnRI7O5MJZWDeRVn-pQ@megapath.net:
In <Xns9773612ED3887mc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce Butler"
<spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:-5adnfaub9_LI2DenZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@megapath.net:
In <Xns9772DEAB7F5CBmc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce
Butler" <spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
news:2MidnVG05bV7gGDeRVn-qw@megapath.net:
In <Xns9772B64007B54mc2500183316chgoill@10.232.1.1>, "R. Pierce
Butler" <spamsucks@google.com> wrote:
"afterlifeevidece" <afterlifeevidece@afterlifeevidece98798798.com>
wrote in news:43fcc3a1$0$12273$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com:
came accross this on the internet... if you are interested in why
people believe in the afterlife this presents much of the evidence
....
http://www.victorzammit.com/book/index.html#download
The chapter citing Einstein's formula E=Mc2 is so utterly wrong it
defies description. That chapter alone is such a profound
demonstration of pure ignorance and stupidity that I find myself
embarrassed for him.
I love how he notes that conversion of mass to energy is what makes
nukes go off but still proposes that for "materialization" and
"dematerialization" of people and things.
So the first time one person dematerialized, the atmosphere is
ripped off the planet...
That attorney reminds me of a letter that was sent to the physics
deprtment of an Ivy League school I worked at a few years ago. This
letter was framed and placed on permanent display. The letter was
from a M.D. and he stated in his letter that he had proven the
existence of the lumineferous ether. He went on to claim that
Mikelson and Morley had done it wrong all those times before. It was
funny yet sad.
I actually love crankery. True insanity is *such a *great find.
This Zammit, though? Not entertaining at *all...
For a real crank, have you ever read the rants of Fracis E. Dec?
Priceless!!!
Communist Gangster Computer God?
Oh my.
Hey, who's this Communist Atheist Conspiracy bunch??? Damn splitters!!
Oh yes, and Francis Dec was an attorney too.
pierce
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
