Religions > Atheism > A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"bobandcarole" |
| Date: |
23 May 2007 01:19:50 PM |
| Object: |
A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/05/23/news/nebraska/bce3d79f584325ca862572e4000bec30.txt
.
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
23 May 2007 04:11:34 PM |
|
|
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole777@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protectgays |
23 May 2007 10:01:52 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole777@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Syd M." |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
25 May 2007 02:38:26 AM |
|
|
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
Of course he does. As long as it's HIS mob..
PDW
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
23 May 2007 10:23:41 PM |
|
|
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
So you favor legitimizing the homosexual lifestyle?? Why don't you
just say it?
The Homosexual Agenda
Even more frightening than the victories homosexuals have won is the
reason they took up the battle in the first place. Was it because
they
were afraid of being arrested for their activity? The court itself
recognized that prosecutions for homosexual activity are extremely
rare and when they do happen it is usually because the activity took
place in public.
The motivation for overturning the laws against homosexuality is the
removal of any public denouncement of the "gay" lifestyle. Homosexual
activists have worked long and hard to achieve moral equality between
their lifestyle and that of heterosexuals.
Having struck down the remaining state laws condemning their behavior
they will now fight even harder to achieve their "holy grail" - full
endorsement of their lifestyle with government-sanctioned homosexual
marriage.
It is likely that before the end of the year either a Massachusetts
or
New Jersey court will rule in favor of a same-sex marriage case. When
they do, it will open the floodgates, and homosexual couples will
rush
to those states to have their relationships officially recognized.
Upon their return home they will use the courts to force their home
states to recognize their new "marriages." Soon, this issue will be
pushed to the Supreme Court as well.
Same Sex Marriages
In writing the majority decision in Lawrence v. Texas, Justice
Kennedy
made a point of stopping short of endorsing same-sex marriage. In
response to Kennedy's statement that the ruling "does not involve
whether the government must give formal recognition" to homosexual
marriage, Justice Scalia wrote, "Do not believe it."
Prior to his attempt to allay fears that the court was creating
same-sex marriage, Justice Kennedy referred to constitutional
protections afforded to "personal decisions relating to marriage,
procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and
education." He then went on to say that anyone "in a homosexual
relationship may seek autonomy for these purposes, just as
heterosexual persons do."
All through Justice Kennedy's decision and Justice O'Conner's
concurring opinion are repeated admonitions about discriminating
against homosexual individuals. Over and over they both make it clear
that any right or opportunity permitted to heterosexuals should be
given equally to homosexuals and any attempt by the state to do
otherwise would be viewed by the court as an unconstitutional act.
The full meaning and impact of this decision has yet to fully
register
in the minds of most Americans. In fact, even if the court were to
force same-sex marriage on the American people today, most would not
fully understand the gravity of the situation.
No Moral Basis for Law
So what are the effects of this decision? Space will not allow me to
fully explore them. Let's start by introducing the moral
implications.
The decision, as Justice Scalia stated it, "effectively decrees the
end of all morals legislation." If the majority of the American
people
cannot agree to make a law based on a moral belief, then what will be
the basis for law?
If we cannot make a law against homosexual sodomy, how can we, as
Scalia points out, criminalize "fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult
incest, bestiality, and obscenity"? Many in the homosexual community
believe that any sexual relationship or sexual act should be
permitted, with anyone ... and at any age.
If, as the court has decided, a majority moral belief is not a
legitimate basis for a law, how can we say it is improper for a young
boy's scoutmaster to introduce him to sexual activity? How can we
limit marriage to one man and one woman? Why not two women, or two
men, or two men and one woman?
If the moral implications were not enough, what about the health and
financial consequences of legitimizing this lifestyle? Most Americans
don't understand all that is involved in the homosexual lifestyle and
therefore are woefully ignorant of its inherent dangers.
Monogamy in Same Sex Marriages
A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that
the average non-infected male homosexual has 106 sexual partners per
year. Another study released in July of this year found that the
average homosexual relationship lasted only 1 years. The study also
found that men in homosexual relationships had an average of eight
partners per year outside of those relationships.
A study conducted by two University of Vermont psychology professors
contrasted couples living in the newly formed "civil unions" with
homosexuals not in unions, and with married heterosexual couples.
They
found that 21 percent of married men felt that sex outside of
marriage
was OK. Among homosexuals, 66 percent of homosexual men in committed
relationships and 50 percent of homosexual men in civil unions felt
the same way.
The fact that promiscuity is rampant among homosexuals is
dramatically
demonstrated in the landmark study conducted by researchers Bell and
Weinber in the mid-1970s. The shocking results of their study found
that:
43 percent of gay men estimated having sex with 500 or more different
partners. 75 percent estimated 100 or more partners. 28 percent
estimated more than 1,000 partners.
79 percent said that more than half of their partners were anonymous.
70 percent said that more than half of their partners were men with
whom they had sex only once.
This type of activity has consequences. Due to their promiscuous
lifestyle, homosexual males are 14 times more likely to contract
syphilis than male heterosexuals and are thousands of times more
likely to contract AIDS.
Added to the dangers of this extreme promiscuity are the dangers of
the actual sexual practices of homosexuals. These two factors
combined
are why studies show that homosexuals account for 80 percent of
America's most serious sexually transmitted diseases. This is in
spite
of the fact that they represent only a tiny fraction of the overall
population.
A study done in the 1990s by the Family Research Institute found that
the median age of death for a homosexual male not having AIDS was
only
42. According to the same study only 9 percent lived to old age.
In light of these facts we need to ask ourselves if this is a
lifestyle that we, as a nation, should endorse as being on par with
normal heterosexual relationships.
If we chose to do so, we can only expect that the numbers of people
involved in this lifestyle will increase. And when those numbers
increase, we cannot even begin to estimate the strain it will put on
our healthcare system.
The Supreme Court has made it clear how it will rule when the issue
of
same-sex marriage comes before it. The only way to overrule a court
that is out of touch with the wishes of the American people and the
reality of the consequences of such a decision is to amend the
Constitution. The recent ruling has given renewed support to a
measure
before Congress called the Federal Marriage Amendment.
The amendment simply states that marriage is a union between one man
and one woman and prohibits passing any law to the contrary. While
the
process of amending the Constitution is intentionally difficult, this
amendment has a real chance of succeeding and needs our full support.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protectgays |
23 May 2007 11:15:59 PM |
|
|
bob&carole wrote:
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
So you favor legitimizing the homosexual lifestyle?? Why don't you
just say it?
And you favor delegitimizing it? The reason that I don't say that I
"legitimize" it is because it's ALREADY legitimate.
The Homosexual Agenda
<snip plagiarized NewsMax article>
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
23 May 2007 11:20:02 PM |
|
|
On May 24, 12:15?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bob&carole wrote:
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
So you favor legitimizing the homosexual lifestyle?? Why don't you
just say it?
And you favor delegitimizing it? The reason that I don't say that I
"legitimize" it is because it's ALREADY legitimate.
homosexuality is another word for perversion...bottom line.
The Homosexual Agenda
<snip plagiarized NewsMax article>
LOL...I left a link, therefore it wasn't plagiarized...Jethro.
Did your mother have any kids that lived?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
24 May 2007 04:41:14 AM |
|
|
On 24 mai, 06:20, bobandcarole <bobandcarol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On May 24, 12:15?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bob&carole wrote:
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
So you favor legitimizing the homosexual lifestyle?? Why don't you
just say it?
And you favor delegitimizing it? The reason that I don't say that I
"legitimize" it is because it's ALREADY legitimate.
homosexuality is another word for perversion...bottom line.
No. I don't care about peoples' private lives. The only perversion is
to stick your nose into somebody's business.
Why are you offended by what consenting adults do?
Are you jealous?
Real perversion is sending every day postings almost exclusively on
homosexuality and pretending to be heterosexual.
You have all the symptoms of the self-loathing closet gays.
Get out of the closet.
You're gay, bob. Deal with it.
The Homosexual Agenda
No such thing.
<snip plagiarized NewsMax article>
LOL...I left a link, therefore it wasn't plagiarized...Jethro.
Did your mother have any kids that lived?-
Does your mother wear a paper bag on her head when she is with you?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kelsey Bjarnason" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill toprotect gays |
26 May 2007 01:00:02 AM |
|
|
[snips]
On Wed, 23 May 2007 21:20:02 -0700, bobandcarole wrote:
homosexuality is another word for perversion...bottom line.
Ya know, Bob - can I call you Bob? - this whole kick you're on about
homosexuals is a bit weird.
Take you, for example. Are you gay? Straight? Bi? I don't know, and
frankly I don't care. Thing is, there's no reason I should care, as the
only case where your sexuality would make any difference to me whatsoever
is if I were trying to date you.
In one way, at least, us het guys should be thankful to the gay males: the
more of them, the better our chances of getting a date for Saturday night.
One could, in a similar vein, argue that gay women should thus be
criticized for limiting the dating pool, but that would tend to assume
that they have some sort of obligation to date us guys, which just ain't
so - isn't so even if they were straight.
Point is, whether a person I'm talking to is gay, straight or otherwise
really just doesn't concern me unless I'm trying to hook up with them, so
if I'm not, then what they do in bed - with a few minor pecadillos such as
involving kids - simply does not matter one tiny little bit to me.
Their sexuality doesn't challenge mine; I'm no more or less a man because
there's a gay man or gay woman about. Their relationships have no
impact on mine - I'm not going to break up with someone just because
there's a gay couple down the street. Their sexuality is completely,
totally, absolutely irrelevant to me; I simply have no reason at all to
give a damn about it.
The obvious question, then, is why do *you* care? Maybe it's "against
God"; fine, I'm sure God is capable of sorting that out without your help.
Maybe it's "against nature" - again, I'm sure nature can sort it out
without your help.
Maybe your relationship is threatened by it somehow? I've heard the line
about how gay marriage, for example, threatens the sanctity of marriage,
but I don't see how; unless you're marrying a gay person, how do *they*
affect *your* relationship? Is your love for your spouse such a feeble
thing that someone else being in love can break that bond? If so, I'd
suggest you re-think your own relationship, as whatever it's based on,
"love" would not seem to be the applicable term.
No, the only case where the sexuality of another would actually matter to
you - as to me - is if you were trying to "get some".
Maybe that's not the case, but there certainly doesn't seem to be any
particular reason for your dislike of gays.
--
You're so ***** backwards, you ***** out the rear of your pants. -- ML
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protectgays |
23 May 2007 11:25:01 PM |
|
|
bobandcarole wrote:
On May 24, 12:15?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bob&carole wrote:
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
So you favor legitimizing the homosexual lifestyle?? Why don't you
just say it?
And you favor delegitimizing it? The reason that I don't say that I
"legitimize" it is because it's ALREADY legitimate.
homosexuality is another word for perversion...bottom line.
So what?
The Homosexual Agenda
<snip plagiarized NewsMax article>
LOL...I left a link, therefore it wasn't plagiarized...Jethro.
No, you didn't.
Did your mother have any kids that lived?
Did your mother have any kids that were intelligent?
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
24 May 2007 08:35:18 AM |
|
|
On May 24, 12:25?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
On May 24, 12:15?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bob&carole wrote:
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
So you favor legitimizing the homosexual lifestyle?? Why don't you
just say it?
And you favor delegitimizing it? The reason that I don't say that I
"legitimize" it is because it's ALREADY legitimate.
homosexuality is another word for perversion...bottom line.
So what?
The Homosexual Agenda
<snip plagiarized NewsMax article>
LOL...I left a link, therefore it wasn't plagiarized...Jethro.
No, you didn't.
http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/05/23/news/nebraska/bce3d79f584325ca862572e4000bec30.txt
Do try to keep up, Jethro.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Syd M." |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
25 May 2007 02:42:02 AM |
|
|
On May 24, 9:35 am, bobandcarole <bobandcarol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On May 24, 12:25?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
On May 24, 12:15?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bob&carole wrote:
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
So you favor legitimizing the homosexual lifestyle?? Why don't you
just say it?
And you favor delegitimizing it? The reason that I don't say that I
"legitimize" it is because it's ALREADY legitimate.
homosexuality is another word for perversion...bottom line.
So what?
The Homosexual Agenda
<snip plagiarized NewsMax article>
LOL...I left a link, therefore it wasn't plagiarized...Jethro.
No, you didn't.
http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/05/23/news/nebraska/bce...
Do try to keep up, Jethro.
Yes, do, BoobandCoward.
PDW
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protectgays |
24 May 2007 10:11:32 PM |
|
|
bobandcarole wrote:
On May 24, 12:25?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
On May 24, 12:15?am, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
bob&carole wrote:
On May 23, 11:01 pm, DanielSan <danielsan...@comcast.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On 23 May 2007 11:19:50 -0700, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
They ARE the minorities and other groups.
And should be afforded the SAME rights as the majority. Unless, of
course, you like mob rule....
So you favor legitimizing the homosexual lifestyle?? Why don't you
just say it?
And you favor delegitimizing it? The reason that I don't say that I
"legitimize" it is because it's ALREADY legitimate.
homosexuality is another word for perversion...bottom line.
So what?
No answer, eh?
The Homosexual Agenda
<snip plagiarized NewsMax article>
LOL...I left a link, therefore it wasn't plagiarized...Jethro.
No, you didn't.
http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/05/23/news/nebraska/bce3d79f584325ca862572e4000bec30.txt
Oops, it wasn't NewsMax; it was Free Republic posting a screed from
Warren Kelly, Executive VP of International Christian Media, which you
stole without proper credit:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/996804/posts
Sorry if I mixed up NewsMax and the Freepers; it's hard to keep these
extreme right wing websites separate..
The URL you posted above is not the article you plagiarized, by the way.
Do try to keep up, Jethro.
Whyfor that moniker?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
23 May 2007 02:10:03 PM |
|
|
bobandcarole wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
Ahhh Nebraska...who the ***** would want to live there anyway...especially if
you're gay.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
23 May 2007 07:44:51 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 May 2007 15:10:03 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
Ahhh Nebraska...who the ***** would want to live there anyway...especially if
you're gay.
Lincoln's a nice little town ... er, village .. er, truck stop on US
6.
.
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
23 May 2007 09:08:22 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 15:10:03 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would
have afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
Ahhh Nebraska...who the ***** would want to live there
anyway...especially if you're gay.
Lincoln's a nice little town ... er, village .. er, truck stop on US
6.
Omaha is pretty cool, at least the downtown area is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
24 May 2007 07:04:00 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 May 2007 21:08:22 -0500, "towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 15:10:03 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would
have afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
Ahhh Nebraska...who the ***** would want to live there
anyway...especially if you're gay.
Lincoln's a nice little town ... er, village .. er, truck stop on US
6.
Omaha is pretty cool, at least the downtown area is.
Going from Lincoln to Omaha, back when I was there around 1980, the
first thing you came to that was actually Omaha was a mall. That mall
was larger than downtown Lincoln.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
24 May 2007 03:27:14 PM |
|
|
towelie wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 15:10:03 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would
have afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
Ahhh Nebraska...who the ***** would want to live there
anyway...especially if you're gay.
Lincoln's a nice little town ... er, village .. er, truck stop on US
6.
Omaha is pretty cool, at least the downtown area is.
Seemed pretty boring to me. I mean, how many steak houses do you need? ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
23 May 2007 09:03:22 PM |
|
|
bobandcarole wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
If that is "sanity" I want to be a raving lunatic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
23 May 2007 09:56:35 PM |
|
|
On May 23, 10:03?pm, "towelie" <bugoNOS...@hotmail.com> wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would have
afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
If that is "sanity" I want to be a raving lunatic.
Congratulations, you got your wish years ago.......
.
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: A little sanity in Nebraska..Senators shoot down bill to protect gays |
24 May 2007 12:41:29 AM |
|
|
bob&carole wrote:
On May 23, 10:03?pm, "towelie" <bugoNOS...@hotmail.com> wrote:
bobandcarole wrote:
LINCOLN (AP) -- State lawmakers killed a bill Tuesday that would
have afforded homosexuals the same workplace protections granted to
minorities and other groups.
If that is "sanity" I want to be a raving lunatic.
Congratulations, you got your wish years ago.......
I've always maintained that I was a little crazy...but at least I'm not
delusional and blinded by hate like you are.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
