Athiests misuse First Amendment (I of all people have no business pointing
out errors in another's posts but I am not working on a PhD. either. She
didn't spell atheists correctly )
http://badgerherald.com/oped/2005/09/16/athiests_misuse_firs.php
by Darryn Beckstrom
Friday, September 16, 2005
*****************************************************************************
‘Under God’ phrase should remain
http://badgerherald.com/oped/2005/09/20/under_god_phrase_s.php
by Darryn Beckstrom
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
*****************************************************
State should endorse monotheism
http://badgerherald.com/oped/2005/11/22/state_should_endorse.php
by Darryn Beckstrom
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
*****************************************************
She is so politically biased and so out of touch with historical and legal
facts that is it scary. A mind and an education is a terrible thing to
waste
She is wasting both.
**************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
