http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15178112/site/newsweek/
A Secret Life
Mark Foley's explicit e-mails could bring down the GOP. His story, and
the fallout.
By Evan Thomas
Newsweek
Oct. 16, 2006 issue - In uptight, colorless Washington, Congressman Mark
Foley, 52, Republican of Florida, was a bon vivant. He loved parties and
making jokes; he did a wicked Bill Clinton imitation; he loved to talk
about sex. He had to be a little bit careful, however. A gay man, he
might bring a boyfriend to private parties, friends say, but when he
appeared on the official cocktail circuit, he went alone or with a
woman. He also hid, or tried to hide, his interest in younger men—much
younger men, including the teenagers who can be seen scurrying around
Capitol Hill toting the mail and taking in, at least in theory, a
firsthand civics lesson. The House pages, the 70-or-so high-schoolers
who spend up to a year in Washington running errands for congressmen,
live in a squat red-brick dormitory at 501 First Street Southeast, less
than five blocks from the Capitol. The building once housed Roman
Catholic nuns who worked at a nearby hospital. The teenage pages are
chaperoned by six staffers and are warned to stay away from drugs and
alcohol. Only steps away from the pages' dorm is a bar called
Bullfeathers, where lobbyists take Hill staffers to down martinis. Two
blocks away is the Cannon House Office Building, where Congressman Foley
had his office.
On one night in 2002 or 2003, an allegedly inebriated Foley showed up at
the pages' dorm after a 10 p.m. curfew and tried to gain entry,
according to an account provided by two congressional sources, who
declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. Foley
was turned away by a guard. It is not known if the pages were ever aware
that Foley lurked outside their door, but word of the incident reached
the House Clerk, who notified Foley's chief of staff, Kirk Fordham.
This was not the first time that Fordham had learned of his boss's
behaving, in that modern all-purpose euphemism, "inappropriately."
Fordham decided that it was time to go to a higher authority, so he went
to see Scott Palmer, chief of staff to the Speaker of the House, Dennis
Hastert. That, at least, is what Fordham is prepared to tell
investigators, according to a knowledgeable source who requested
anonymity in discussing the probe. Palmer has already accused Fordham of
dissembling, and Washington is settling in for one of its periodic
melodramas of moralizing and prurience.
The secret world of Mark Foley—and the denial and bumbling of the House
leaders who possibly did not want to know too much about that world—is
beginning to emerge in bits and pieces of lurid detail. What actually
happened—from the moment that Hill staffers first became aware of
Congressman Foley's unusual interest in teenage congressional pages—is
the source of intrigue, finger-pointing, shock, fear and loathing on
Capitol Hill and of endless fascination around the country. No wonder:
the political fortunes of the Republican Party hang in the balance.
Voters may not understand the legalistic ins-and-outs of
campaign-finance scandals or know much about an influence peddler like
Jack Abramoff beyond his name. But they can follow the details of a sex
scandal, especially one that they can imagine harming their own
children. It was not necessary to read Foley's leering (and worse)
e-mails and instant messages to former congressional pages—in one, he
asks "Do I make you a little horny?"—to be disgusted by an obvious abuse
of power and trust. If enough voters express their feelings about the
scandal at the polls in November (or by just staying home), the
Republicans could lose control of Congress.
It is too early to know exactly why the Republicans failed to heed the
warning signs about Foley's interest in the pages. Staffers raised
concerns, the Speaker's office was notified and Rep. John Shimkus, head
of the House Page Board, was dispatched to caution Foley and warn him
away from the pages. But nobody bothered to investigate further—a step
that might have uncovered the broader pattern of predatory behavior now
evident.
There are plenty of theories about why the leadership did not take the
matter more seriously. In the Washington power culture, incumbents are
generally protected from the consequences of their own actions. That's
especially true in a Congress where one party has ruled both houses for
years; the concept of meaningful oversight has been essentially
forgotten. And in a party ruled largely by conservatives, and built with
the help of evangelicals, many of whom view homosexuality as unnatural
and homosexual acts as sinful, leaders may also have had a special
reluctance to scrutinize the sexual behavior of their colleagues or
their staffs.
Inevitably, Washington was rife with nasty rumors of a "Velvet Mafia" of
gay Hill staffers conspiring to protect each other. But Foley's
homosexuality should not be the central issue in the scandal. His
wrongdoing was to sexually prey on teenagers. Sexual orientation has
nothing to do with sexual predation, and to suggest otherwise is to
dredge up ugly stereotypes that are factually wrong (according to a 2000
Justice Department study, 97 percent of adults who sexually assault 12-
to 17-year-old children are male—and 90 percent of their victims are
female). Nonetheless, it is relevant that Foley is both homosexual and a
Republican.
A number of top GOP staffers on Capitol Hill are gay and, generally
speaking, most do not advertise their sexual orientation. Some staffers
may believe that their place at the pinnacle of power could be
compromised if their private lives were publicly known. Republican
leaders on the Hill may not want to know too much about the sexual
orientation of a fellow Republican congressman, like Foley, or even
their staffers. They may wish to be in a position to deny any knowledge.
If there were any efforts among gay staffers to protect Foley, they may
have been motivated by personal considerations, or an effort to protect
the GOP's rule on Capitol Hill. "The notion that there's a cabal and
they're closing ranks and protecting one another because they're gay is
reprehensible," says Brian Bennett, who came out after serving as chief
of staff to former congressman Bob Dornan, a fierce right-winger.
"People protect each other because they're friends."
Republicans have been tripping over each other for days trying to get
their stories straight on who knew what and when. The various
explanations have only served to obfuscate. In the end, the Republicans
may not be able to escape the irony of the Foley scandal. In 2004, the
GOP helped get President George W. Bush re-elected by turning out the
base, especially the Christian right, to vote for state bans on gay
marriage. In 2006, the GOP may lose control of Congress because it
didn't try harder to investigate a gay congressman who was also a sexual
predator.
The man at the center of the scandal is, or was, by all accounts an
unusually upbeat, buoyant politician. Raised in modest circumstances,
Foley, the son of a Marine veteran of Guadalcanal, has been enamored
with politics from the time he dropped out of Palm Beach Junior College
to start a small restaurant. A moderate Republican, he became a fixture
in the glitzy Palm Beach social scene, hobnobbing with the wealthy at
places like Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate. Foley was "just easy to
like," says Sid Dinerstein, chair of the Palm Beach County Republican
Party. "He loved his job. He loved waking up in the morning to find
another event to go to."
Foley did not exactly hide his sexual orientation. He was often spotted
with his longtime companion, a well-to-do Palm Beach dermatologist,
though Dinerstein says the two were careful not to sit together at big
charity functions. From time to time, however, Foley had to evade
questions. Asked by a local radio host when he first ran for Congress in
1994 "Is it true you're gay?" Foley replied, "I have a girlfriend." He
said the woman lived in Miami and spent time in Washington. In 2003,
Foley backed out of a bid for the Senate, ostensibly to care for his
sick father—but also, his friends suggested, because he did not want to
withstand the inevitably increased scrutiny of his sexual orientation.
In Washington, Foley's homosexuality was an open secret. Gays active in
Republican politics describe an informal "don't ask, don't tell" rule:
gay staffers can be out of the closet, as long as they aren't too public
about it. The party leadership apparently welcomed Foley: he raised
hundreds of thousands of dollars for GOP campaign coffers. Radical gay
groups sometimes try to out closeted GOP congressmen, but Foley believed
he had some protection. He could not be accused of hypocrisy because he
voted against a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.
Still, Foley was subject to the jeers of at least one openly gay
Democratic congressman. Last week Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts
told the Advocate.com, a gay news site, "Once, at a congressional
Christmas party at the White House, my ex-boyfriend Herb went up to
Foley, who was with a female date, and said to him, 'Why don't you get a
real date?' Foley didn't say anything."
Foley was sexually active in Washington, according to a gay Republican
who declined to be identified discussing Foley's private life. Because
he had a longtime partner, he told a friend, he preferred to have
affairs with men who also had boyfriends. That way, he explained, they
both had something to lose. Foley jokingly described this practice as
"mutually assured destruction," said this friend.
Foley was looked after, at least to a degree, by Kirk Fordham, who ran
Foley's first campaign and came to Washington as his chief of staff.
Fordham, who is openly gay, has said he warned Foley not to flirt too
openly. If Fordham is to be believed, Foley began showing undue interest
in congressional pages as early as 2001. The Clerk of the House, Jeff
Trandahl, advised Fordham to warn Foley about his conduct. Fordham, a
skilled and ambitious political operative, left Foley's staff after he
bowed out of a Senate run in 2003 and moved on, ultimately becoming
chief of staff to Rep. Tom Reynolds, the head of the Republican
congressional campaign committee.
Foley sent the e-mails that ultimately led to his downfall beginning in
July 2005. Foley e-mailed a former page to ask, "How old are you now?"
He asked the page what he wanted for his birthday. In a later e-mail,
after Hurricane Katrina had hit Louisiana, Foley asked after his safety
and to send a picture of himself. The e-mails were very familiar, but
not overtly sexually suggestive, though in one e-mail Foley noted that
he was on his way to the gym and wrote, "I am just finished riding my
bike on a 25-mile journey."
The e-mails "freaked me out," the page told a staffer for his
congressman, Louisiana Rep. Rodney Alexander. Foley's request for an
"e-mail pic" was "sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick
sick sick," the page told the staffer, scheduler Danielle Savoy.
Representative Alexander's staff notified Speaker Hastert's staff, who
in turn went to Representative Shimkus, the congressman who runs the
Page Board, which acts as a kind of all-purpose den mother to the young
pages.
A former Army Ranger, Shimkus is a tall, straight-talking West Pointer.
He was shown at least parts of some of the e-mails, which he thought
were disturbing, but ambiguous. In the fall of 2005, Shimkus marched
over to Foley's office in the Cannon Building. Shimkus had been told by
Clerk of the House Trandahl that the page's parents wanted the contact
between Foley and their son to be stopped immediately. Fearing a media
frenzy, they also wanted the matter to go no further.
Shimkus told Foley, "This is unacceptable. Stay away from the kid and
stay away from the pages," according to a Shimkus staffer. Foley looked
taken aback, the aide says. Foley said that he was merely acting as a
"mentor." "Am I guilty of being too friendly?" Foley asked. "Yes," he
answered his own question.
At the time, Shimkus was satisfied with Foley's response. He now refers
to Foley as a "slimeball," and regrets he did not push further. He says
he was fooled by Foley's performance and felt constrained by the
parents' desire for discretion.
The e-mails from Foley to the page did not go away. They began showing
up in newsrooms—at the St. Petersburg Times and The Miami Herald in
Florida and some Washington news organizations. It is not clear how they
got there. (A St. Petersburg Times editor told NEWSWEEK that the paper
received the e-mails from a source in Alexander's office. The
congressman's office did not return calls.) Journalists at several news
organizations have identified the leaker as a "Republican
whistle-blower." But it is also true that liberal and gay activist
bloggers picked up the scent. While the newspapers did not believe that
the e-mails revealed enough evidence of wrongdoing to publish them, the
blogs had fewer compunctions. On Sept. 24, a site called
stopsexpredators.blogspot.com published scanned images of Foley's
e-mails to the pages, and within hours, the widely read liberal blog
Daily Kos provided a link to the mystery blogger.
Over at ABC news, veteran investigative reporter Brian Ross had known
about the Foley e-mails for some time, but he was distracted by more
pressing stories. After the story was already out on the Internet, Ross
published portions of the e-mails on his own blog, The Blotter.
The ABC blog seems to have opened the floodgates. Overnight, other
former congressional pages began sending Ross much racier instant
messages sent out by Foley, suggesting that the congressman had engaged
in Internet sex and was angling for trysts. An ABC producer called
Foley's office and read his staff some of the messages.
Foley was having lunch at his Capitol Hill town house with his old
friend and former aide Kirk Fordham and other campaign advisers when
they heard about the ABC inquiry. The congressman had already responded
to the earlier, more benign e-mails with a statement brushing them off
and accusing his Democratic opponent of smear tactics. On the phone,
Foley told a friend, "It's worse. There are new e-mails and they're very
graphic." Foley knew he was finished. Fordham walked over to GOP
headquarters and shared the information with Reynolds and Hastert,
according to a source who was present (and asked for anonymity given the
delicacy of the situation). Fordham brought back a draft resignation
letter; Foley signed it that evening. Fordham tried to win Foley some
cover by offering ABC's Ross an exclusive on Foley's resignation if Ross
agreed not to print the seamier messages. But Ross wasn't buying. Foley
signed a short resignation letter and was in his car, a BMW, driving
south for Florida by that evening.
Saying that he had an alcohol problem, Foley checked into rehab. His
lawyer, David Roth, put out a statement that Foley had been abused by a
clergyman as a teen—and said his client "unequivocally" denied having
sex with a minor. These assertions were greeted with some skepticism,
even by Foley's supporters. No one seemed to be able to recall seeing
Foley drunk—though it is interesting that Foley was reportedly
inebriated when he allegedly showed up outside the pages' dorm on that
night three or four years ago. Foley did attend a parochial school, but
so far no evidence has emerged that he was abused there. Though the FBI
has opened up an investigation into Foley's relations with the pages, it
is unlikely he will be prosecuted unless evidence emerges that he tried
to lure minors into physical sex, not just e-mail sex.
The questions about Foley's past were accompanied by a furious round of
accusations and denials by House Republican leaders. Hastert originally
said he first heard about Foley's page problem from staff as the news
broke. But House Republican leader John Boehner insisted that he had
talked to Hastert himself last spring about Foley's contacts with the
page. Republican operatives began predicting that Hastert would have to
take the fall and resign. Last week, the Speaker, who has long been
viewed as a figurehead installed by former House majority leader Tom
DeLay, took "responsibility" for the Foley mess—without admitting that
he had done anything wrong. In an attempt to quiet the speculation about
his future, Hastert vowed that he would not step down. But the questions
about what the GOP leadership knew about Foley—and what Hastert & Co.
did or did not do—would not go away.
Behind the scenes, attention increasingly focused on Foley's after-hours
visit to the pages' dorm several years ago. If Foley were really
behaving that outrageously so long ago, why hadn't more been done to
stop him? The answers may start with the testimony of Fordham, the
former Foley chief of staff who is now cooperating with federal
investigators.
Fordham had long worried about the behavior of his friend and boss. As
early as in 2001, Fordham had received disturbing reports of Foley's
"inappropriate" behavior toward the congressional pages. According to a
knowledgeable source familiar with Fordham's account, who did not wish
to be identified discussing such a sensitive matter, Fordham is prepared
to tell investigators that he was warned "on two or three occasions"
about Foley's "overly friendly" socializing with young male pages.
He was informed by Jeff Trandahl, then the Clerk of the House, who
oversees the page program. On one occasion, sometime in 2002 or 2003,
Trandahl told Fordham about Foley's nocturnal adventure to the pages'
dorm. Trandahl told Fordham that Foley "appeared intoxicated," according
to the source who provided Fordham's account to NEWSWEEK.
This incident prompted Fordham to go to Scott Palmer, Hastert's chief of
staff, and tell him about Foley's behavior. Fordham called Palmer and
told him that he wanted to speak with him privately, the source says.
The two men met in a small office on Capitol Hill. (Palmer says the
meeting never took place.)
Fordham did not tell Palmer about Foley's attempt to enter the pages'
dormitory, but rather that he was generally concerned about his boss's
excessive friendliness to the pages, according to the source. Palmer
expressed surprise and concern, the source says, and wondered what this
could mean to Foley's political future. Why would he endanger his career
with such conduct?
Palmer assured Fordham that he would talk to Foley. A day or two later,
Fordham called Palmer to ask what happened. Palmer told him that he
"dealt with it" by talking to Foley and that he "informed the Speaker,"
according to the source familiar with Fordham's account. Months later
Fordham had an awkward conversation with Foley in which his boss
indicated that he had spoken to Palmer.
Last week, as House GOP leaders felt the waves of scandal breaking over
their heads, a spokesman for Hastert insisted that Fordham had never
warned the Speaker or his top aide, Palmer. "What Fordham said did not
happen," said Palmer in a written statement. Trandhahl, who resigned for
unknown reasons as Clerk of the House in November 2005, was not
returning phone calls. Trandahl, who like Fordham is openly gay, could
be an important witness as the House ethics committee begins an inquiry.
Foley's alleged late-night visit to the pages' dorm came up during a
fraught conference call for all House Republican congressmen last week,
and various Republican leaders were demanding a full investigation. One
GOP member, Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, said in a statement provided
to NEWSWEEK that she had "learned" of the incident at the pages' dorm
after she initiated her own investigation. One of her staff aides said
that Brown-Waite had talked to a House official with direct knowledge of
what had happened. Capitol Police were saying last week that they could
find no records of Foley's alleged visit to the dorm.
At the White House, aides were straining to sound optimistic. "I think
we've stabilized," said one senior Bush aide, operating under the usual
White House requirement of anonymity. "Unless there's another circular
firing squad or new information comes out." Others were gloomier. In
Rep. Ray LaHood's Illinois district, the Foley scandal has been the lead
story in the local paper every day for the past week. "We had this game
plan of coming home and talking about our accomplishments on border
security and the economy, and nobody wants to hear about it," says
LaHood. "The only thing I hear from people is Foley ... It's all anybody
wants to talk about, and I don't see that changing any time soon."
According to the new NEWSWEEK Poll, fully 53 percent of Americans want
the Democrats to win control of Capitol Hill next month; just 35 percent
want the GOP to retain power. For the first time since 2001, the poll
shows, more Americans trust the Democrats than the GOP on moral values.
It's not just the voters who care about "family values" who might be
driven away, said Matt Dowd, Bush's longtime pollster. The brouhaha on
the Hill threatens what Dowd calls "the gut values" relationship between
voters and politicians they trust. "Values always determine elections,"
says Dowd. "Deep gut values, like 'Do I trust someone?'" Several leading
party strategists worry that public trust in the House Republican
leadership—never exactly ironclad, even among the truest
Republicans—could be shredded by disarray in the leadership and doubts
about whether they tried hard enough to deal with Foley before he could
prey on teenagers.
The Democrats seemed happy to just get out of the way and let the
Republicans devour themselves. "The story has plenty of energy on its
own," said one Democratic strategist, who asked not to be identified as
he crowed. "There's no need for us to draw attention to it." Minority
Leader Nancy Pelosi has been strongly demanding an investigation, but
she is seen as well positioned to take a public role, since her San
Francisco district has a large gay population, and she runs little risk
of being branded as insensitive. Republicans are furiously accusing the
Democrats of timing the scandal to break just before the election. "This
was a professional hit," says Grover Norquist, head of Americans for Tax
Reform and a leading GOP activist. No evidence of Democratic Party
involvement has turned up, though whether the blogs got any information
from party sources is open to question.
There is a real risk that the Foley scandal could spur a vicious
campaign to out closeted gay Republicans. Although many gay
conservatives make little effort to hide their sexual orientation, they
have to put up with a certain amount of disdain, if not outright
hostility, from certain quarters. Some GOP lawmakers frowned on Foley's
fraternization with younger male staffers. A House GOP aide remembers
standing on the House floor with his boss when Foley came over to say
hello. Afterward, the aide remembers, his boss turned to him with an air
of disdain. "Do you hang around with that guy?" the congressman asked.
If the Foley scandal continues its downward spiral, the atmosphere of
suspicion will only get worse.
This story was written by Evan Thomas with reporting from Michael
Isikoff, Richard Wolffe, Mark Hosenball, Holly Bailey, Debra Rosenberg
and Jonathan Darman in Washington, Arian Campo-Flores, Catharine Skipp
and Carmen Gentile in Florida and Lee Hudson Teslik in New York.
/end
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
