A Sucker Bet for the Christians



 Religions > Atheism > A Sucker Bet for the Christians

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Don Martin"
Date: 13 Jan 2008 05:34:22 PM
Object: A Sucker Bet for the Christians
On page 273 of Niall Ferguson's _The War of the World: Twentieth-Century
Conflict and the Descent of the West_ (ISBN: 978-0-14-311239-6) we find this
statement about the United States response to European antisemitism, "...a Bill
to admit 20,000 Jewish children to the United States was rejected by the Senate
in 1939 and again in 1940."
I hereby affirm that I have not consulted _The Congressional Record_ for the
relevant years, so offer this wager on my own unsupported speculation:
THE BET: I say that the majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out
of the U.S. were publicly avowed Christians.
Any takers?
$200 in cash to the first person showing me to be in error in my claim that the
majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out were publicly avowed
Christians.
#2278 If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old man?
Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheel http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
.

User: "Dag Yo"

Title: Re: A Sucker Bet for the Christians 14 Jan 2008 07:43:48 AM
I wish I could say my country's leaders would have more decency today,
but i'm not sure.
On Jan 13, 3:34 pm, Don Martin <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:

On page 273 of Niall Ferguson's _The War of the World: Twentieth-Century
Conflict and the Descent of the West_ (ISBN: 978-0-14-311239-6) we find this
statement about the United States response to European antisemitism, "...a Bill
to admit 20,000 Jewish children to the United States was rejected by the Senate
in 1939 and again in 1940."

I hereby affirm that I have not consulted _The Congressional Record_ for the
relevant years, so offer this wager on my own unsupported speculation:

THE BET: I say that the majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out
of the U.S. were publicly avowed Christians.

Any takers?

$200 in cash to the first person showing me to be in error in my claim that the
majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out were publicly avowed
Christians.

#2278 If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old man?
Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheelhttp://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

.

User: "Hatter"

Title: Re: A Sucker Bet for the Christians 14 Jan 2008 08:24:20 AM
On Jan 13, 6:34=A0pm, Don Martin <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:

On page 273 of Niall Ferguson's _The War of the World: Twentieth-Century
Conflict and the Descent of the West_ (ISBN: 978-0-14-311239-6) we find th=

is

statement about the United States response to European antisemitism, "...a=

Bill

to admit 20,000 Jewish children to the United States was rejected by the S=

enate

in 1939 and again in 1940."

I hereby affirm that I have not consulted _The Congressional Record_ for t=

he

relevant years, so offer this wager on my own unsupported speculation:

THE BET: I say that the majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids=

out

of the U.S. =A0were publicly avowed Christians.

Any takers?

$200 in cash to the first person showing me to be in error in my claim tha=

t the

majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out were publicly avowe=

d

Christians.

#2278 If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old m=

an?

=A0 =A0Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheelhttp://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

If one aswers your call, it will certainly be accompanied by bagpipes.
Hatter
.
User: "Don Martin"

Title: Re: A Sucker Bet for the Christians 14 Jan 2008 12:26:37 PM
On Jan 14, 9:24 am, Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 13, 6:34 pm, Don Martin <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:



On page 273 of Niall Ferguson's _The War of the World: Twentieth-Century
Conflict and the Descent of the West_ (ISBN: 978-0-14-311239-6) we find this
statement about the United States response to European antisemitism, "...a Bill
to admit 20,000 Jewish children to the United States was rejected by the Senate
in 1939 and again in 1940."


I hereby affirm that I have not consulted _The Congressional Record_ for the
relevant years, so offer this wager on my own unsupported speculation:


THE BET: I say that the majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out
of the U.S. were publicly avowed Christians.


Any takers?


$200 in cash to the first person showing me to be in error in my claim that the
majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out were publicly avowed
Christians.


#2278 If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old man?
Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheelhttp://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/


If one aswers your call, it will certainly be accompanied by bagpipes.

I'm hoping for it--I so love pentatonic scales--but the christians
seem to be pretty thin on the ground today.
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: A Sucker Bet for the Christians 14 Jan 2008 04:37:19 PM
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:26:37 -0800 (PST), Don Martin
<drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote:

On Jan 14, 9:24 am, Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 13, 6:34 pm, Don Martin <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:



On page 273 of Niall Ferguson's _The War of the World: Twentieth-Century
Conflict and the Descent of the West_ (ISBN: 978-0-14-311239-6) we find this
statement about the United States response to European antisemitism, "...a Bill
to admit 20,000 Jewish children to the United States was rejected by the Senate
in 1939 and again in 1940."


I hereby affirm that I have not consulted _The Congressional Record_ for the
relevant years, so offer this wager on my own unsupported speculation:


THE BET: I say that the majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out
of the U.S. were publicly avowed Christians.


Any takers?


$200 in cash to the first person showing me to be in error in my claim that the
majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out were publicly avowed
Christians.


#2278 If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old man?
Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheelhttp://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/


If one aswers your call, it will certainly be accompanied by bagpipes.


I'm hoping for it--I so love pentatonic scales--but the christians
seem to be pretty thin on the ground today.

It's the time of year that they celebrate pagan festivals, left right
and centre.
.



User: "Ben Kaufman"

Title: Re: A Sucker Bet for the Christians 13 Jan 2008 11:52:43 PM
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:34:22 -0500, Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote:

On page 273 of Niall Ferguson's _The War of the World: Twentieth-Century
Conflict and the Descent of the West_ (ISBN: 978-0-14-311239-6) we find this
statement about the United States response to European antisemitism, "...a Bill
to admit 20,000 Jewish children to the United States was rejected by the Senate
in 1939 and again in 1940."

I hereby affirm that I have not consulted _The Congressional Record_ for the
relevant years, so offer this wager on my own unsupported speculation:

THE BET: I say that the majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out
of the U.S. were publicly avowed Christians.

Any takers?

$200 in cash to the first person showing me to be in error in my claim that the
majority of those Senators voting to keep the kids out were publicly avowed
Christians.




#2278 If you can't be a dirty old man, what is the point of being an old man?
Through a jaundiced eye darkly--rheum with a view.
The Squeeky Wheel http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

If they were 20,000 embryos it would have been another matter.
Ben
.
User: "Don Martin"

Title: Re: A Sucker Bet for the Christians 14 Jan 2008 07:37:40 AM
On Jan 14, 12:52 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-
doll...@pobox.com> wrote:


If they were 20,000 embryos it would have been another matter.

Well, if those embryos had accepted Jesus H. Christ as their personal
savior, they'd be in like Flynn.
Personally, I do not see why those senators ought not be held culpable
in the probable murders of those kids.
.
User: "Ben Kaufman"

Title: Re: A Sucker Bet for the Christians 14 Jan 2008 02:34:44 PM
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:37:40 -0800 (PST), Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net>
wrote:

On Jan 14, 12:52 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-
doll...@pobox.com> wrote:


If they were 20,000 embryos it would have been another matter.


Well, if those embryos had accepted Jesus H. Christ as their personal
savior, they'd be in like Flynn.

Personally, I do not see why those senators ought not be held culpable
in the probable murders of those kids.

They will probably claim that at the time they did not know about the genocide.
Ben
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Gotta love those christians....
4 out of 5 Christians Believe...
Christians Claim "The Media Did It"
School zone sex club: Christians for bisexual dads.
The Love of Christians
Bush's family friend arrest Christians
Mark Thomas writes a column offensive to Christians.
Who would Jesus vote for? (Christians are on a mission to tell us)
smelt any christians lately ?
New Mexico Christians, beat gays, rape 4-year-old boys
Christians call whitewashing of John Paul's papacy a 'miracle'
From the Messiah to the 144,000 and the 200 million of the 12 tribes of Israel. On Jewish science.On the Global Holocaust of the Gentiles (Idolaters / Usuryists / Christians). The secrets of dephypotising humanity (Jewish science). To the Seven Serva
Are Christians Morally Superior To Atheists?
Bellyaching Christians should give it a rest
Christians are attacking this guy..
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER