Religions > Atheism > Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
05 May 2007 08:12:36 PM |
| Object: |
Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
http://www.lifenews.com/nat3065.html
Boston, MA (LifeNews.com) -- A study by Harvard University researchers
that's come under fire for denying the link between abortion and
breast cancer also contained confirmation that carrying a pregnancy to
term helps reduce a woman's risk. Pro-life advocates say the finding
shows women should be encouraged to seek abortion alternatives.
Lost in the abortion-breast cancer link debate was the fact that the
researchers affirmed previous studies showing that a full-term
pregnancy before age 35 reduces the long-term risk of developing
breast cancer.
They said the fact was well-established and that their own research
renewed the evidence for it.
Karin Michels of Brigham and Women's Hospital, who headed the study,
said that someone who has had an abortion "misses out on the potential
benefit she would have had if she had a full-term pregnancy."
Responding to the finding on childbirth, Karen Malec, of the Coalition
on Abortion/Breast Cancer, told LifeNews.com that "Even the NCI agrees
that increased childbearing, starting at an early age, protects women
from breast cancer."
"Legislators have a moral obligation to require abortion providers to
inform expectant mothers that if they have an abortion, their breast
cancer risk will be higher than it would be if they have a baby.
That's settled science," she explained.
An October study published in the International Journal of Cancer
confirms previous research showing that carrying a pregnancy to term
reduces a woman's risk.
"It is well established that pregnancies that end in a full-term birth
ultimately confer a protective effect on breast cancer risk," Dr.
Gillian K. Reeves, of the University of Oxford, wrote in the IJC
research article.
Also, researchers at the German Cancer Research Center found a woman's
risk of contracting breast cancer is lowered and the decrease is more
substantial the more pregnancies a woman has had.
.
|
|
| User: "655321" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
05 May 2007 09:50:16 PM |
|
|
In article <1178413956.348961.287420@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The anti-choice cartel is going out of their way to repeat
these lies to women. Why?
(You're welcome.)
--
655321
"We are heroes in error" -- Ahmad Chalabi
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found NO LINK between abortion and cancer |
05 May 2007 08:36:02 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
Again and again, research study after research study has shown that
there is NO link between abortion and breast cancer, but the evil
anti-sex pro-liars are so twisted in their hate of women and their
fear of sex that they qwill use ANY lie in order to get people to buy
their propaganda.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found NO LINK between abortion and cancer |
05 May 2007 11:23:11 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:463d3102$0$14067$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
Again and again, research study after research study has shown that
there is NO link between abortion and breast cancer, but the evil
anti-sex pro-liars are so twisted in their hate of women and their
fear of sex that they qwill use ANY lie in order to get people to buy
their propaganda.
Why are you so anti-USA?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found NO LINK between abortion and cancer |
06 May 2007 12:32:27 AM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
Again and again, research study after research study has shown that
there is NO link between abortion and breast cancer, but the evil
anti-sex pro-liars are so twisted in their hate of women and their
fear of sex that they will use ANY lie in order to get people to buy
their propaganda.
Why are you so anti-USA?
Why are you a drunk and a criminal pervert?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom S" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found NO LINK between abortion and cancer |
06 May 2007 07:47:07 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 6 May 2007 00:23:11 -0400, "John D. Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:463d3102$0$14067$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
Again and again, research study after research study has shown that
there is NO link between abortion and breast cancer, but the evil
anti-sex pro-liars are so twisted in their hate of women and their
fear of sex that they qwill use ANY lie in order to get people to buy
their propaganda.
Why are you so anti-USA?
Why are you so anti-truth? That is about as un-American as you can
get.
Tom S.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found NO LINK between abortion and cancer |
06 May 2007 01:25:23 AM |
|
|
On May 5, 6:36 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
Again and again, research study after research study has shown that
there is NO link between abortion and breast cancer, but the evil
anti-sex pro-liars
Anti sex pro liars? What are you, a sex maniac!! You know
nothing of science but you appear to be an expert
on sex. The truth is that women who never give birth
or who murder their unborn are more prone to female
cancers than normal women who have children. It's called
use it or lose it. Nature will quickly decide that if breasts
or ovaries are not used for the purpose they are intended
there is no point in retaining them you daft little baby hater.
are so twisted in their hate of women and their
fear of sex that they qwill use ANY lie in order to get people to buy their propaganda.
You 're the idiot who thinks that pregnancy is "slavery" and a
"disease". Get some mental help and stay away from silly
women, who knows you might get one pregnant and then
you will be in a real mess, you will either have to marry her
or pay some abortion mill owner with a funny name to kill
her baby.
--
Ray Fischer
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found NO LINK between abortion and cancer |
06 May 2007 11:32:18 AM |
|
|
<> wrote:
rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
Again and again, research study after research study has shown that
there is NO link between abortion and breast cancer, but the evil
anti-sex pro-liars
Anti sex pro liars?
People like you.
What are you, a sex maniac!!
Only with my wife, prude.
You know
nothing of science
You'd like to think that. The reality is that I have a couple of
degrees in science.
but you appear to be an expert
on sex. The truth is that women who never give birth
or who murder their unborn are more prone to female
And so the pro-liar lunatic goes off on another irrational
"baby murderer" rant, screeching hate at all who dares to
reject her ideology of hate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
05 May 2007 10:52:24 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
You mean, THESE facts?
"Induced and Spontaneous Abortion and Incidence of Breast Cancer Among
Young Women: A Prospective Cohort Study."
Karin B. Michels, Fei Xue, Graham A. Colditz, and Walter C. Willett.
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:814-820. Vol. 167 No. 8, April 23, 2007
Background - Induced abortion has been inconsistently associated with
breast cancer risk in case-control studies. Retrospective cohort
studies using registry information in Scandinavia have not suggested
an increase in the incidence of breast cancer, although data on
individual reproductive factors were not accounted for.
Methods - We examined the association between induced and spontaneous
abortion and the incidence of breast cancer in a prospective cohort of
young women, the Nurses' Health Study II. The study included 105,716
women 29 to 46 years old at the start of follow-up in 1993.
Information on induced or spontaneous abortions was collected in 1993
and updated biennially. During 973,437 person-years of follow-up
between 1993 and 2003, 1,458 newly diagnosed cases of invasive breast
cancer were ascertained.
Results - A total of 16,118 participants (15%) reported a history of
induced abortion, and 21,753 (21%) reported a history of spontaneous
abortions. The hazard ratio for breast cancer among women who had 1 or
more induced abortions was 1.01 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.17)
after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors; among
women with 1 or more spontaneous abortions, the covariate-adjusted
hazard ratio was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.01). The
relation between induced abortion and the incidence of breast cancer
did not differ materially by number of abortions (P for trend = .98),
age at abortion (P for trend = .68), parity (P for interaction = .54),
or timing of abortion with respect to a full-term pregnancy (P for
interaction = .10).
Conclusion - Among this predominantly premenopausal population,
neither induced nor spontaneous abortion was associated with the
incidence of breast cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
06 May 2007 04:21:31 PM |
|
|
On May 5, 8:52 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
You mean, THESE facts?
snip list of "facts" put out by those with an agenda and those
who think that killing the unborn is a normal act.
Female breasts are there for a reason. It's called nature.
They providfe milk for the newborn. If they are not used for
that purpose, there is no point in having them. Nature
always has the last word.
"Spartakus"? I was in East Berlin in 1988 and while
passing a cemetary I saw a grave with *that* word on it.
I have always wondered if it was the grave of that vile
anarchist Rosa Luxemburg who left the home of her rich
jew father and went to Germany from Poland in order to
do what they do best, create chaos. Some clever
German decided that Germany didn't need jew anarchists
to run the country so he shot her. Good riddance.
snip loads of why the gutter class will not get cancer
when they kill their own unborn.
Conclusion - Among this predominantly premenopausal population,
neither induced nor spontaneous abortion was associated with the incidence of breast cancer.
Use it or lose it. A good motto to remember.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Show No Connection. Again |
06 May 2007 05:52:01 PM |
|
|
<> wrote:
On May 5, 8:52 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
You mean, THESE facts?
snip list of "facts" put out by those with an agenda and those
who think that killing the unborn is a normal act.
As opposed to you lunatics who think that terrorism and enslavement or
moral? The fact is that you pro-liars have tried to push that ABC
***** on women for years and keep ignoring the fact that it is a
lie, from beginning to end.
Female breasts are there for a reason. It's called nature.
They providfe milk for the newborn. If they are not used for
that purpose, there is no point in having them. Nature
always has the last word.
And not you, lunatic. Your _opinion_ about the purpose of breasts
counts for exactly nothing.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Show No Connection. Again |
07 May 2007 03:28:27 PM |
|
|
On May 6, 3:52 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Boedi...@isp.com <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 5, 8:52 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
You mean, THESE facts?
snip list of "facts" put out by those with an agenda and those
who think that killing the unborn is a normal act.
As opposed to you lunatics who think that terrorism and enslavement or moral?
My God he's back again with his "slavery" obsession!
Tell me dimbulb how many times have you seen "Roots",
if your obsesion with savery is any uide I would say
too many. "Terrorism"? is Al Qeida after the unborn now!!
The fact is that you pro-liars have tried to push that ABC
***** on women for years and keep ignoring the fact that it is a
lie, from beginning to end.
Female breasts are there for a reason. It's called nature.
They providfe milk for the newborn. If they are not used for
that purpose, there is no point in having them. Nature
always has the last word.
And not you, lunatic. Your _opinion_ about the purpose of breasts
counts for exactly nothing.
And *your* idiotic ravings about "slavery" label you for the
insane cretin you are.
"You demand enslavement of pregnant women".
Fischer May 14th. 2005
"The woman is not anybody's slave".
Fischer May 14th. 2005
"Pro life from conception to birth and then slavery and
execution"
Fischer Nov. 17, 2005
The idiot never did explain about the "execution" bit.
"She is not your slave"
Fischer Jan 11 2005
"Demanding the abject servitude of pregnant women is
demanding slavery".
Fischer JAn 7. 2006
"Don't use it as an excuse to enslave pregnant women".
Fischer May 4, 2005
"Involunatry servitude is illegal and immoral".
Fischer May 4, 2005
You are a brick short of a load and badly in need of mental
help. I suggest you get it and as quickly as possible
before you start attacking pregnant women in the supermarket.
Garbage and cowards murder innocent unborn babies. I
suspect you are both
--
Ray Fischer
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Show No Connection. Again |
07 May 2007 08:52:05 PM |
|
|
<> wrote:
rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Boedi...@isp.com <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 5, 8:52 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
You mean, THESE facts?
snip list of "facts" put out by those with an agenda and those
who think that killing the unborn is a normal act.
As opposed to you lunatics who think that terrorism and enslavement or moral?
My God he's back again with his "slavery" obsession!
You demand the enslavement of pregnant women. Rather than deal with
you you "pretend" to be an irraitonal lunatic who thinks that forcging
peopel to serve as yuou demand is not enslavement.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
06 May 2007 07:24:08 PM |
|
|
On May 6, 2:21 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 5, 8:52 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
You mean, THESE facts?
snip list of "facts" put out by those with an agenda and those
who think that killing the unborn is a normal act.
It's not a list; it's an *abstract* for a research paper published in
"Archives of Internal Medicine, a peer-reviewed professional medical
journal. The only "agenda" at work here is finding the truth through
scientific methods, a process with which you are completely
unfamiliar, I'm sure.
Female breasts are there for a reason. It's called nature.
How about appendixes?
They providfe milk for the newborn. If they are not used
for that purpose, there is no point in having them. Nature
always has the last word.
Why, that had all the depth of a puddle of ferret whizz. Your medical
expertise is without parallel in the known universe.
"Spartakus"? I was in East Berlin in 1988 and while
passing a cemetary I saw a grave with *that* word on it.
I have always wondered if it was the grave of that vile
anarchist Rosa Luxemburg who left the home of her rich
jew father and went to Germany from Poland in order to
do what they do best, create chaos. Some clever
German decided that Germany didn't need jew anarchists
to run the country so he shot her. Good riddance.
You're thinking of the Spartakusbund - a more inept bunch of
revolutionaries I never hope to read about.. Actually, my handle is a
movie reference. I'm thinking of two movies where the phrase "I AM
SPARTAKUS!!!" appears. One is grand and heroic, the other is more
light-hearted. My handle is inspired more by the latter.
snip loads of why the gutter class will not get cancer
when they kill their own unborn.
Ah, your love of humanity knows no bounds.
Conclusion - Among this predominantly premenopausal population,
neither induced nor spontaneous abortion was associated with the
incidence of breast cancer.
Use it or lose it. A good motto to remember.
So that's what happened to your brain!
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
brief tenure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
07 May 2007 03:35:11 PM |
|
|
On May 6, 5:24 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
On May 6, 2:21 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 5, 8:52 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
The so-called pro-choice cartel is going out of their way to hide
these facts from women. Why?
You mean, THESE facts?
snip list of "facts" put out by those with an agenda and those
who think that killing the unborn is a normal act.
It's not a list; it's an *abstract* for a research paper published in
"Archives of Internal Medicine, a peer-reviewed professional medical
journal. The only "agenda" at work here is finding the truth through
scientific methods, a process with which you are completely
unfamiliar, I'm sure.
Female breasts are there for a reason. It's called nature.
How about appendixes?
They providfe milk for the newborn. If they are not used
for that purpose, there is no point in having them. Nature
always has the last word.
Why, that had all the depth of a puddle of ferret whizz. Your medical
expertise is without parallel in the known universe.
"Spartakus"? I was in East Berlin in 1988 and while
passing a cemetary I saw a grave with *that* word on it.
I have always wondered if it was the grave of that vile
anarchist Rosa Luxemburg who left the home of her rich
jew father and went to Germany from Poland in order to
do what they do best, create chaos. Some clever
German decided that Germany didn't need jew anarchists
to run the country so he shot her. Good riddance.
You're thinking of the Spartakusbund - a more inept bunch of
revolutionaries I never hope to read about.. Actually, my handle is a
movie reference. I'm thinking of two movies where the phrase "I AM
SPARTAKUS!!!" appears. One is grand and heroic, the other is more
light-hearted. My handle is inspired more by the latter.
snip loads of why the gutter class will not get cancer
when they kill their own unborn.
Ah, your love of humanity knows no bounds.
Conclusion - Among this predominantly premenopausal population,
neither induced nor spontaneous abortion was associated with the
incidence of breast cancer.
Use it or lose it. A good motto to remember.
So that's what happened to your brain!
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
brief tenure.
I never "stumble" into anything. The cretins who post
in alt/baby killing crossposted their drivel to scj no doubt
with the idea of finding friends among the jews who post there.
The realised that many of those radical, loony leftie fems
were jews and no doubt intended to drum up some
support from the radical, loony leftie fems who post in scj.
One has to wonder why a race who says they are
religious would support the murder of innocent babies
in the womb, it must be the bolshie in them and a desire
to cause chaos and destruction of the culture of the
host nation in every way they can.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
07 May 2007 06:06:38 PM |
|
|
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote in message
news:1178570111.275389.16540@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On May 6, 5:24 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
On May 6, 2:21 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
snip loads of why the gutter class will not get cancer
when they kill their own unborn.
Ah, your love of humanity knows no bounds.
Conclusion - Among this predominantly premenopausal population,
neither induced nor spontaneous abortion was associated with the
incidence of breast cancer.
Use it or lose it. A good motto to remember.
So that's what happened to your brain!
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
brief tenure.
I never "stumble" into anything. The cretins who post
in alt/baby killing crossposted their drivel to scj no doubt
with the idea of finding friends among the jews who post there.
Free clue: The cretin that posted this troll ("J Young") into <sjc> is one
of yours.
Iow, a rabid anti-Semite and all around UseNut.
<snip rant>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
07 May 2007 09:00:59 PM |
|
|
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed
to you.
The cretins who post in alt/baby killing crossposted their drivel ...
That was JYoung/IBen's idea. I really don't think that "cretin" goes
far enough in describing him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
09 May 2007 11:06:08 PM |
|
|
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything. I do not post
in baby killing groups, the people who post there smell bad.
Posters should stop crossposting their stuff all over the net.
Why would those who post in scj think that the babykillers
would be interested in their veiws - birds of a feather?
As for women who kill their own unborn babies, I repeat,
they are garbage and so are the males who impregnate them
and then make no effort to protect the baby they created.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
11 May 2007 11:26:38 PM |
|
|
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus<sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus<sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago
and provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during
your brief tenure.
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything.
You've been stumbling so long, you don't even realize it anymore.
I do not post in baby killing groups,
Neither do I.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
09 May 2007 11:15:48 PM |
|
|
"Boedicia@isp.com" <Boedicia@isp.com> writes:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to
you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything. I do not post
in baby killing groups, the people who post there smell bad.
You just posted to alt.abortion, Sherlock. Apparently you have no idea of how
to control your newsreader.
Posters should stop crossposting their stuff all over the net.
Why would those who post in scj think that the babykillers
would be interested in their veiws - birds of a feather?
As for women who kill their own unborn babies, I repeat,
they are garbage and so are the males who impregnate them
and then make no effort to protect the baby they created.
I guess that's why I've been pro-choice about as long as my wife has been -
close to 40 years, by now - and we're parents and grandparents. Choke on that
for a while.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
10 May 2007 12:25:26 AM |
|
|
On 10-May-2007, The Chief Instigator <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Boedicia@isp.com" <Boedicia@isp.com> writes:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed
to
you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything. I do not post
in baby killing groups, the people who post there smell bad.
You just posted to alt.abortion, Sherlock. Apparently you have no idea of
how to control your newsreader.
There hasn't been a single post where she has shown
herself to have anything but the most minimal intelligence.
Susan
Posters should stop crossposting their stuff all over the net.
Why would those who post in scj think that the babykillers
would be interested in their veiws - birds of a feather?
As for women who kill their own unborn babies, I repeat,
they are garbage and so are the males who impregnate them
and then make no effort to protect the baby they created.
I guess that's why I've been pro-choice about as long as my wife has been
- close to 40 years, by now - and we're parents and grandparents.
That's because you're not killing babies.
Choke on
that for a while.
I'm hoping for at least two minutes...
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
11 May 2007 09:07:46 PM |
|
|
On May 9, 10:25 pm, wrote:
On 10-May-2007, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> writes:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed
to
you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything. I do not post
in baby killing groups, the people who post there smell bad.
You just posted to alt.abortion, Sherlock. Apparently you have no idea of
how to control your newsreader.
There hasn't been a single post where she has shown
herself to have anything but the most minimal intelligence.
Susan
Posters should stop crossposting their stuff all over the net.
Why would those who post in scj think that the babykillers
would be interested in their veiws - birds of a feather?
As for women who kill their own unborn babies, I repeat,
they are garbage and so are the males who impregnate them
and then make no effort to protect the baby they created.
I guess that's why I've been pro-choice about as long as my wife has been
- close to 40 years, by now - and we're parents and grandparents.
That's because you're not killing babies.
I wonder why. One wuold think he would be good at it.
Choke on
that for a while.
I'm hoping for at least two minutes...
You should have stuck with the faith of your race, since you
"converted" and now think your're a real jew, you are beginning
to sound like them even as you remain what you are, a silly
little boghopper with the IQ of an orange.
Susan- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
09 May 2007 11:45:12 PM |
|
|
On May 10, 12:15=EF=BF=BDam, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wro=
te:
I guess that's why I've been pro-choice about as long as my wife has been=
-
close to 40 years, by now - and we're parents and grandparents. =A0Choke =
on that
for a while.
Since your ragged old ***** is alot more than 40, that means you were at
one time pro-life; albeit as a lad. Since most youngsters follow the
opinion of their parents, you were probably raised by pro-life
parents. Too bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
11 May 2007 09:04:54 PM |
|
|
On May 9, 9:45 pm, J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 12:15?am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
I guess that's why I've been pro-choice about as long as my wife has been -
close to 40 years, by now - and we're parents and grandparents. ?Choke on that
for a while.
Since your ragged old ***** is alot more than 40, that means you were at
one time pro-life; albeit as a lad. Since most youngsters follow the
opinion of their parents, you were probably raised by pro-life
parents. Too bad.
I'm surprised he doesn't believe that his wife was a "slave"
when she was pregnant. The fool Fischer believes that
pregnant women are "slaves" or so he has posted 1000 times
over. These children who were allowed to be born are
very lucky. Millions of innocent babies are not so lucky,
they were conceived by the garbage of the world and killed
before they took their first breath. Who decided that they
weren't worthy enough to live? The abortion mill owner
who gets rich by killing them? The vile tart who is too lazy
to raise them? The male who impregnated the woman
and then did a runner? Who decides? There is no crime
worse than the killing of defenceless children and when that
crime is committed by those who, one would think would
protect them, it is an obscenity.
The jew is in the forefront of the abortion racket. One only
has to see the names of all those radical "feminists"
who were/are active in this filthy business to see who is
benefiting from it. One of them, a N.Y. abortion mill
owner was killed as he came home from, of all places,
the synagogue. Justice has a long arm.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
12 May 2007 01:22:31 PM |
|
|
<> wrote:
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
On May 10, 12:15?am, The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
I guess that's why I've been pro-choice about as long as my wife has been -
close to 40 years, by now - and we're parents and grandparents. ?Choke on that
for a while.
Since your ragged old ***** is alot more than 40, that means you were at
one time pro-life; albeit as a lad. Since most youngsters follow the
opinion of their parents, you were probably raised by pro-life
parents. Too bad.
I'm surprised he doesn't believe that his wife was a "slave"
when she was pregnant. The fool Fischer believes that
pregnant women are "slaves" or so he has posted 1000 times
over.
You are lying.
These children who were allowed to be born are
very lucky. Millions of innocent babies are not so lucky,
They die of hunger and disease because selfish hypocrites like you are
more interested in making people suffer than you are interested in
helping people in need.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pinch" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
19 May 2007 08:51:54 AM |
|
|
On May 10, 12:06 am, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything.
Except sanity.
I do not post
in baby killing groups,
Neither do we.
Of course you were once one of abortion newsgroups more active
posters, Mrs. Allison, posting behind such aliases as Sneechres (the
namesake of your deceased kitty) and Cleopatra (because you're
ugly)...until you were discovered (thanks to your own oversight) and
driven out. Doubtless you'll return under some other identity to pull
the same ***** and face the same eventuality. You'll never learn.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
19 May 2007 06:11:38 PM |
|
|
On May 19, 6:51 am, Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> wrote:
On May 10, 12:06 am, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything.
Except sanity.
I do not post
in baby killing groups,
Neither do we.
Of course you were once one of abortion newsgroups more active
posters, Mrs. Allison, posting behind such aliases as Sneechres (the
namesake of your deceased kitty) and Cleopatra (because you're
ugly)...until you were discovered (thanks to your own oversight) and
driven out. Doubtless you'll return under some other identity to pull
the same ***** and face the same eventuality. You'll never learn.
You sound like somebody in the last stages of either AIDS
or Alzheimers. I have been "Boedicia" for 10+ years
and have never used another screen name. I also have
never posted in baby killing groups. I see these obscene
pro death posts in scj *not* baby killing groups because
you morons insist on crossposting them here, no doubt
hoping to drum up support from the race who support
whatever slease is available. So many of these radical
loony "feminists" who are neither feminine or normal are jews.
*Do* try and get your information correct before you squat
in front of the common room computer in whatever loony bin
you are confined in.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pinch" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
20 May 2007 07:25:08 AM |
|
|
On May 19, 7:11 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 19, 6:51 am, Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> wrote:
On May 10, 12:06 am, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything.
Except sanity.
I do not post
in baby killing groups,
Neither do we.
Of course you were once one of abortion newsgroups more active
posters, Mrs. Allison, posting behind such aliases as Sneechres (the
namesake of your deceased kitty) and Cleopatra (because you're
ugly)...until you were discovered (thanks to your own oversight) and
driven out. Doubtless you'll return under some other identity to pull
the same ***** and face the same eventuality. You'll never learn.
You sound like somebody in the last stages of either AIDS
or Alzheimers.
The same can be applied to you, Mrs. Allison, since you're the nutcase
declaring that many of the Pro-Choice parents in this newsgroup hate
and support the deaths of children.
If you had been smart nearly a decade ago, you'd have posted
completely anonymously, so don't blame me for your mistakes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
21 May 2007 01:35:44 AM |
|
|
On May 20, 5:25 am, Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> wrote:
On May 19, 7:11 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 19, 6:51 am, Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> wrote:
On May 10, 12:06 am, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything.
Except sanity.
I do not post
in baby killing groups,
Neither do we.
Of course you were once one of abortion newsgroups more active
posters, Mrs. Allison, posting behind such aliases as Sneechres (the
namesake of your deceased kitty) and Cleopatra (because you're
ugly)...until you were discovered (thanks to your own oversight) and
driven out. Doubtless you'll return under some other identity to pull
the same ***** and face the same eventuality. You'll never learn.
You sound like somebody in the last stages of either AIDS
or Alzheimers.
The same can be applied to you, Mrs. Allison
Golly geem first of all I am "Amanda" now I'm Mrs Allison.
Tell me, do you drink?
, since you're the nutcase
declaring that many of the Pro-Choice parents in this newsgroup hate
and support the deaths of children.
If you had been smart nearly a decade ago, you'd have posted
completely anonymously, so don't blame me for your mistakes.
I am aware that you are not all there, but *do* stop whatever
stuff you are sticking up your nose. "nearly a decade ago"?
I've been posting far longer than that and always under the
same name I use now. I know of no "Amanda" but if you
don't like her, she must be a great person. I bet *she*
has children and loves them and raises them, as I do.
The only people *you* seem to care for are those
who stick scissors into the brains of babies halfway
out of the womb and tear others, many fully formed limb by limb
from the womb of some ghastly prostitute simply because
it pays well.
Take my advice, ask for forgiveness and who knows,
you might be able to turn your life around and start saving
lives instead of taking them.
"Suffer little chidlren to come unto me for such is The
Kingdom of Heaven".
I bet *He* wouldn't approve of killing the unborn because
*He* wasn't a coward.
..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pinch" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
21 May 2007 11:39:50 AM |
|
|
On May 21, 2:35 am, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 20, 5:25 am, Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> wrote:
On May 19, 7:11 pm, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 19, 6:51 am, Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> wrote:
On May 10, 12:06 am, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything.
Except sanity.
I do not post
in baby killing groups,
Neither do we.
Of course you were once one of abortion newsgroups more active
posters, Mrs. Allison, posting behind such aliases as Sneechres (the
namesake of your deceased kitty) and Cleopatra (because you're
ugly)...until you were discovered (thanks to your own oversight) and
driven out. Doubtless you'll return under some other identity to pull
the same ***** and face the same eventuality. You'll never learn.
You sound like somebody in the last stages of either AIDS
or Alzheimers.
The same can be applied to you, Mrs. Allison
Golly geem
Yeah - "gem," imagine that.
first of all I am "Amanda" now I'm Mrs Allison.
One and the same.
Tell me, do you drink?
Like all people - yes. My favorite beverage of choice is served at
Dunkin' Donuts.
, since you're the nutcase
declaring that many of the Pro-Choice parents in this newsgroup hate
and support the deaths of children.
If you had been smart nearly a decade ago, you'd have posted
completely anonymously, so don't blame me for your mistakes.
I am aware that you are not all there,
You completely left HERE (and went _there_), a long time ago. Only a
rabidly insane poster would claim that pro-choice parents support
infanticide.
but *do* stop whatever
stuff you are sticking up your nose.
Unlike you,psychobitch, I don't keep the drug economy alive.
"nearly a decade ago"?
I've been posting far longer than that and always under the
same name I use now. I know of no "Amanda" but if you
don't like her, she must be a great person. I bet *she*
has children and loves them....
She vowed never to have any, at one time. Just as don't presently,
despite your claims to the contrary. Amanda,
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion-Breast Cancer Study Found Having Baby Reduces Cancer Risk |
19 May 2007 09:53:09 AM |
|
|
Pinch <pinch@cheerful.com> writes:
On May 10, 12:06 am, "Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
On May 7, 7:00 pm, Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
"Boedi...@isp.com" <Boedi...@isp.com> wrote:
Spartakus <sparta...@my-deja.com> wrote:
I remember you! You stumbled into talk.abortion some years ago and
provided us regulars with nanoseconds of entertainment during your
I never "stumble" into anything.
OK, you stumbled *out* of talk.abortion after having your head handed to
you.
Neither do I stumble "out" of anything.
Except sanity.
....and on a frequent schedule, to boot.
I do not post in baby killing groups,
Neither do we.
Of course you were once one of abortion newsgroups more active
posters, Mrs. Allison, posting behind such aliases as Sneechres (the
namesake of your deceased kitty) and Cleopatra (because you're
ugly)...until you were discovered (thanks to your own oversight) and
driven out. Doubtless you'll return under some other identity to pull
the same ***** and face the same eventuality. You'll never learn.
Amanda's never been known for choosing to learn anything outside her
fantasies.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
