"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:XvydnQvhxpD1lp_ZRVn-uQ@giganews.com...

http://bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22732



by Kelly Boggs



ALEXANDRIA, La. (BP)--Pro-abortion activists have long maintained that
abortion in America is about a woman's "right to choose." They are
correct.
Abortion in the United States is about the right of a woman -- or teenage
girl in too many cases -- to choose to have sex without any regard for the
"negative" repercussion of pregnancy.

In a recent Village Voice column, Rachel Kramer Bussel highlighted the
pro-sex aspect of the abortion debate. She wrote, "I'm pro-choice because
I
couldn't fully enjoy sex were I'm consumed with worry about the potential
consequences."

Bussel's sentiment is consistent with statistics on abortion motives.
According to several surveys on why women choose abortion in the U.S.,
around 90 percent of respondents indicate their reason for aborting their
unborn child was based on some aspect of convenience.

If, and when, you hear pro-abortionists squawk about abortion being about
the health of a woman, ignore them. Abortion in America is not about
women's
health, it is about a woman's sexual independence.

Bussel, a senior editor at Penthouse Variations and a columnist for
Penthouse magazine, also writes the Village Voice's regular "Lusty Lady"
column and reviews books for The New York Post. She links the pro-abortion
movement with other activist groups.

"We need to safeguard all forms of consensual sexual expression, including
sodomy and kink, for 'choice' to truly matter," Bussel wrote in the
Village
Voice piece. "The pro-choice movement and the GLBT movement should work
together to ensure our right to sexual autonomy."

I do not know how much official cooperation takes place between homosexual
activists and proponents of abortion. However, I do know that I have never
witnessed a pro-abortion rally that did not have a strong presence of
homosexual activists participating.

What do homosexual activists have in common with pro-abortion activists?
"Gay" activists seek to legitimize homosexual behavior by promoting a view
of sexuality that is completely severed from procreation.

Homosexual activists have a vested interest in convincing society that
reproduction and sexual intercourse are somehow mutually exclusive. Bussel
not only understands the link, but is one of the few willing to admit it.

Bussel wrote in the Village Voice, "People have sex for many reasons --
pleasure, boredom, curiosity, peer pressure, and, yes, baby-making." What
Bussel and activists -- both homosexual and pro-abortion -- miss is that
procreation is the main purpose of sex and not just one of many reasons.

No doubt sex is pleasurable; however, pregnancy is the natural outcome of
sex. It is not just something to engage in when bored, curious or seeking
pleasure. If the primary purpose of sex was anything other than
procreation,
pregnancy would not be the result.

Sadly, the success of activists in divorcing sex from procreation has
resulted in the death of more than 47 million pre-born babies. It has also
laid the foundation for a sexual ethic that has managed to
compartmentalize
intercourse from reproduction and made both seem mutually exclusive of one
another. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Sexual intimacy is the consummation of a life-long promise to be faithful
to
one's marital spouse, as well as a commitment to the probable consequence
of
intercourse -- a child. Thanks to abortion supporters, far too many in
America now view sexual intercourse as nothing more than a
no-strings-attached recreational pursuit.

You need to get laid badly *****!

--------------894AA5AEC631E853FE839440
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7; x-mac-type="54455854";

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



J Young wrote:

http://bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22732

Sex is about every single one of us being here in the first place and the same
applies to the billions of other living creatures that the evolutionary process
caused.

Grow up Brother

Bob Young

by Kelly Boggs

ALEXANDRIA, La. (BP)--Pro-abortion activists have long maintained that
abortion in America is about a woman's "right to choose." They are correct.
Abortion in the United States is about the right of a woman -- or teenage
girl in too many cases -- to choose to have sex without any regard for the
"negative" repercussion of pregnancy.

In a recent Village Voice column, Rachel Kramer Bussel highlighted the
pro-sex aspect of the abortion debate. She wrote, "I'm pro-choice because I
couldn't fully enjoy sex were I'm consumed with worry about the potential
consequences."

Bussel's sentiment is consistent with statistics on abortion motives.
According to several surveys on why women choose abortion in the U.S.,
around 90 percent of respondents indicate their reason for aborting their
unborn child was based on some aspect of convenience.

If, and when, you hear pro-abortionists squawk about abortion being about
the health of a woman, ignore them. Abortion in America is not about women's
health, it is about a woman's sexual independence.

Bussel, a senior editor at Penthouse Variations and a columnist for
Penthouse magazine, also writes the Village Voice's regular "Lusty Lady"
column and reviews books for The New York Post. She links the pro-abortion
movement with other activist groups.

"We need to safeguard all forms of consensual sexual expression, including
sodomy and kink, for 'choice' to truly matter," Bussel wrote in the Village
Voice piece. "The pro-choice movement and the GLBT movement should work
together to ensure our right to sexual autonomy."

I do not know how much official cooperation takes place between homosexual
activists and proponents of abortion. However, I do know that I have never
witnessed a pro-abortion rally that did not have a strong presence of
homosexual activists participating.

What do homosexual activists have in common with pro-abortion activists?
"Gay" activists seek to legitimize homosexual behavior by promoting a view
of sexuality that is completely severed from procreation.

Homosexual activists have a vested interest in convincing society that
reproduction and sexual intercourse are somehow mutually exclusive. Bussel
not only understands the link, but is one of the few willing to admit it.

Bussel wrote in the Village Voice, "People have sex for many reasons --
pleasure, boredom, curiosity, peer pressure, and, yes, baby-making." What
Bussel and activists -- both homosexual and pro-abortion -- miss is that
procreation is the main purpose of sex and not just one of many reasons.

No doubt sex is pleasurable; however, pregnancy is the natural outcome of
sex. It is not just something to engage in when bored, curious or seeking
pleasure. If the primary purpose of sex was anything other than procreation,
pregnancy would not be the result.

Sadly, the success of activists in divorcing sex from procreation has
resulted in the death of more than 47 million pre-born babies. It has also
laid the foundation for a sexual ethic that has managed to compartmentalize
intercourse from reproduction and made both seem mutually exclusive of one
another. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Sexual intimacy is the consummation of a life-long promise to be faithful to
one's marital spouse, as well as a commitment to the probable consequence of
intercourse -- a child. Thanks to abortion supporters, far too many in
America now view sexual intercourse as nothing more than a
no-strings-attached recreational pursuit.

--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"

--------------894AA5AEC631E853FE839440
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
&nbsp;
<p>J Young wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><a

Sex is about every single one of us being here in the first place and the
same applies to the billions of other living creatures that the evolutionary
process caused.
<p>Grow up Brother
<p>Bob Young
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><a

<p>by&nbsp; Kelly Boggs
<p>ALEXANDRIA, La. (BP)--Pro-abortion activists have long maintained that
<br>abortion in America is about a woman's "right to choose." They are
correct.
<br>Abortion in the United States is about the right of a woman -- or teenage
<br>girl in too many cases -- to choose to have sex without any regard
for the
<br>"negative" repercussion of pregnancy.
<p>In a recent Village Voice column, Rachel Kramer Bussel highlighted the
<br>pro-sex aspect of the abortion debate. She wrote, "I'm pro-choice because
I
<br>couldn't fully enjoy sex were I'm consumed with worry about the potential
<br>consequences."
<p>Bussel's sentiment is consistent with statistics on abortion motives.
<br>According to several surveys on why women choose abortion in the U.S.,
<br>around 90 percent of respondents indicate their reason for aborting
their
<br>unborn child was based on some aspect of convenience.
<p>If, and when, you hear pro-abortionists squawk about abortion being
about
<br>the health of a woman, ignore them. Abortion in America is not about
women's
<br>health, it is about a woman's sexual independence.
<p>Bussel, a senior editor at Penthouse Variations and a columnist for
<br>Penthouse magazine, also writes the Village Voice's regular "Lusty
Lady"
<br>column and reviews books for The New York Post. She links the pro-abortion
<br>movement with other activist groups.
<p>"We need to safeguard all forms of consensual sexual expression, including
<br>sodomy and kink, for 'choice' to truly matter," Bussel wrote in the
Village
<br>Voice piece. "The pro-choice movement and the GLBT movement should
work
<br>together to ensure our right to sexual autonomy."
<p>I do not know how much official cooperation takes place between homosexual
<br>activists and proponents of abortion. However, I do know that I have
never
<br>witnessed a pro-abortion rally that did not have a strong presence
of
<br>homosexual activists participating.
<p>What do homosexual activists have in common with pro-abortion activists?
<br>"Gay" activists seek to legitimize homosexual behavior by promoting
a view
<br>of sexuality that is completely severed from procreation.
<p>Homosexual activists have a vested interest in convincing society that
<br>reproduction and sexual intercourse are somehow mutually exclusive.
Bussel
<br>not only understands the link, but is one of the few willing to admit
it.
<p>Bussel wrote in the Village Voice, "People have sex for many reasons
--
<br>pleasure, boredom, curiosity, peer pressure, and, yes, baby-making."
What
<br>Bussel and activists -- both homosexual and pro-abortion -- miss is
that
<br>procreation is the main purpose of sex and not just one of many reasons.
<p>No doubt sex is pleasurable; however, pregnancy is the natural outcome
of
<br>sex. It is not just something to engage in when bored, curious or seeking
<br>pleasure. If the primary purpose of sex was anything other than

<br>pregnancy would not be the result.
<p>Sadly, the success of activists in divorcing sex from procreation has
<br>resulted in the death of more than 47 million pre-born babies. It has
also
<br>laid the foundation for a sexual ethic that has managed to compartmentalize
<br>intercourse from reproduction and made both seem mutually exclusive
of one
<br>another. Nothing could be further from the truth.
<p>Sexual intimacy is the consummation of a life-long promise to be faithful
to
<br>one's marital spouse, as well as a commitment to the probable consequence
of
<br>intercourse -- a child. Thanks to abortion supporters, far too many
in
<br>America now view sexual intercourse as nothing more than a
<br>no-strings-attached recreational pursuit.
<p>--
<br>"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"</blockquote>
</html>

--------------894AA5AEC631E853FE839440--

Get your religion out of my government.