Religions > Atheism > Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
18 Dec 2007 11:12:57 PM |
| Object: |
Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
It is my duty to all the ladies to present this information.
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/dec/07121803.html
Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms
RICHMOND, VA, December 18, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Women who have had an
abortion run three times the normal risk of having a subsequent low
birthweight baby, suggests research in the Journal of Epidemiology and
Community Health.
The study titled "Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and
preterm births" is published in the January 2008 edition of the journal on
pages 16-22.
The more abortions a woman has, the greater are her chances of giving birth
to a child that is underweight or premature in the future, the research
shows.
Low birthweight (under 2500 g) and premature birth (less than 37 weeks) are
two of the major contributors to deaths among newborn babies and infants.
The authors used data from the United States Collaborative Perinatal
Project, which was set up in 1959 to look at the associations between
factors during pregnancy and birth and childhood development.
In total, more than 45,500 mother and child pairs were assessed. Nearly 40%
of the mothers had one or two children and almost two thirds were between 20
and 29 years of age.
Rates of low birthweight and premature birth were highest among mothers who
were black, young or old, poorly educated, and unmarried.
But there was a strong association between abortion and an early or
underweight birth, even after adjusting for other influential factors, such
as smoking, high blood pressure and heavy drinking.
Women who had had one, two, or three or more abortions in the past were
almost three, five, and 9 times as likely to give birth to an underweight
child as those without previous abortions.
Similarly, women who had one abortion were 67% more likely to have a
premature birth, while those who had had three or more were over three times
as likely to do so compared with those with no history of abortion.
The authors acknowledge that previous research has been inconclusive, with
some studies reporting no increased risk while others have found a
significantly increased risk.
Nevertheless, women and healthcare professionals should be aware of the
potential risks, they conclude.
Click here to view the paper in full:
http://press.psprings.co.uk/jech/december/16_ch50369.pdf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Copyright: LifeSiteNews.com. Permission to republish is granted (with
limitation*) but acknowledgement of source is *REQUIRED* (use
LifeSiteNews.com).
NEWS TIPS to or call toll free 1-866-787-9947.
Donate to LifeSiteNews.com at http://www.lifesite.net/contribute/
--
J Young
jyoungvisions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Being a methadone addict triples your chance of being a burnout |
19 Dec 2007 08:44:33 AM |
|
|
Drug-addled dumbass "J Young" <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1g6v1c.74u.19.1@news.alt.net...
It is my duty to all the ladies to present this information.
Do your duty and go to rehab, meth boy!
"A.A. has no position on any outside issues but, ask yourself (and only
yourself) why would you want to do these other substances if your goal is to
straighten out your life p.s. I'm a former maintainance man so i'm not just
talking out my *****. good luck and God bless! ;)"
From: (J Young)
Newsgroups: alt.recovery.aa
Subject: Re: methadone
Date: 12 Nov 2003 19:31:53 -0800
Message-ID: <25e1e54f.0311121931.6fedbc4f@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chom Noamsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 12:20:18 AM |
|
|
J Young, a pro-life fundamentalist nutbar wrote:
It is my duty to all the ladies to present this information.
And it is my duty to clarify the definition of "abortion" used in the
report.
The term used in the study is defined as:
"both miscarriages and induced abortions"
It's very disingenuous of pro-lifers not to clarify that little detail.
Miscarriage is a natural occurance that happens in roughly 25% of all
pregnancies. Compare that to the rate of induced abortion, which in Canada
is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for people bad at math). More
"abortions" are due to miscarriages than terminations.
Reading up on the prevalence of miscarriage in wikipedia, it states:
"In women, by the age of forty-five, 75% of pregnancies may end in
miscarriage"
and
"Pregnancies from men older than forty years are 60% more likely to end
in miscarriage than the 25-29 year age group."
The older you get the higher the rate of miscarriage (or "abortion" as
defined in the study). When are pro-lifers going to demand age limits on
reproduction?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscarriage
http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/health42a.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 08:46:01 AM |
|
|
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Seriously, though, is Canada's abortion rate really nearly 1 in 3. Egad, it
is!
http://www.webhart.net/vandee/abortstat.shtml#Therapeutic
Interestingly, the number from the US declines steadily since Roe v. Wade.
Watch that stat jump.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SaPeIsMa" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 11:11:32 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:UMGdnR2YKLc0s_TanZ2dnUVZ_tqtnZ2d@giganews.com...
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Actually "percent" means "for each hundred"
So 29.7 out of 100 is 29.7%
Clearly neither of you dolts were listening in math class
Seriously, though, is Canada's abortion rate really nearly 1 in 3. Egad,
it is!
Yup 29.7 % is nearly 33.3%
http://www.webhart.net/vandee/abortstat.shtml#Therapeutic
Interestingly, the number from the US declines steadily since Roe v. Wade.
Watch that stat jump.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 10:18:52 PM |
|
|
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:13mikbumaul8838@corp.supernews.com...
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:UMGdnR2YKLc0s_TanZ2dnUVZ_tqtnZ2d@giganews.com...
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Actually "percent" means "for each hundred"
So 29.7 out of 100 is 29.7%
Clearly neither of you dolts were listening in math class
Nope. The OP was correct.
Out of each 129.7 pregnancies, 100 resulted in live births (miscarriages
excluded).
NB. If the foetus is aborted, then a live birth *cannot* result.
The figure of 22% (approx) is correct.
Clearly you weren't paying attention either.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
| User: "SaPeIsMa" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
20 Dec 2007 07:48:28 AM |
|
|
"Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com> wrote in message
news:M2maj.22918$zw.15139@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:13mikbumaul8838@corp.supernews.com...
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:UMGdnR2YKLc0s_TanZ2dnUVZ_tqtnZ2d@giganews.com...
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Actually "percent" means "for each hundred"
So 29.7 out of 100 is 29.7%
Clearly neither of you dolts were listening in math class
Nope. The OP was correct.
Out of each 129.7 pregnancies, 100 resulted in live births (miscarriages
excluded).
You're changing the numbers, son
I worked with the numbers that were visible in the post I responded to.
NB. If the foetus is aborted, then a live birth *cannot* result.
The figure of 22% (approx) is correct.
Clearly you weren't paying attention either.
I worked with the numbers available in the post I read
I still have not developed to ability to see numbers that do NOT appear in
the post I'm responding to, and that MAY have appeared elsewhere
But I will congratulate you in your divination skills.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chom Noamsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
20 Dec 2007 02:42:26 PM |
|
|
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:13mksn0divohv0b@corp.supernews.com...
I worked with the numbers available in the post I read
I still have not developed to ability to see numbers that do NOT appear in
the post I'm responding to, and that MAY have appeared elsewhere
But I will congratulate you in your divination skills.
I see you have developed the ability to divine words that do not appear in a
post. You see, the key term here is "per" as in "29.7 per 100". In my
prior post I do not see the words "out of" anywhere.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 11:36:03 AM |
|
|
SaPeIsMa wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:UMGdnR2YKLc0s_TanZ2dnUVZ_tqtnZ2d@giganews.com...
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like
2.97%! ;-)
Actually "percent" means "for each hundred"
So 29.7 out of 100 is 29.7%
Clearly neither of you dolts were listening in math class
Clearly you missed the joke which should have been obvious even for the
slowest idiot by the following statement and the little winky face.
Seriously, though, is Canada's abortion rate really nearly 1 in 3.
Egad, it is!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Kaufmann" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies NewStudy Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 11:13:44 AM |
|
|
Geoff wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Seriously, though, is Canada's abortion rate really nearly 1 in 3. Egad, it
is!
http://www.webhart.net/vandee/abortstat.shtml#Therapeutic
Interestingly, the number from the US declines steadily since Roe v. Wade.
Watch that stat jump.
For people _really_ bad at math:
29.7 induced abortions/100 live births + 100 live births = 129.7
pregnancies that don't miscarry
29.7/129.7 = 22.9% of pregnancies that don't miscarry.
Carl a.a.#1966
EAC Liar, Damned Liar, and Statistician
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 11:36:38 AM |
|
|
Carl Kaufmann wrote:
Geoff wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like
2.97%! ;-)
Seriously, though, is Canada's abortion rate really nearly 1 in 3.
Egad, it is!
http://www.webhart.net/vandee/abortstat.shtml#Therapeutic
Interestingly, the number from the US declines steadily since Roe v.
Wade. Watch that stat jump.
For people _really_ bad at math:
29.7 induced abortions/100 live births + 100 live births = 129.7
pregnancies that don't miscarry
29.7/129.7 = 22.9% of pregnancies that don't miscarry.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 11:37:50 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:46:01 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Actually, for people *really* bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 would be
29.7%. <G>
29.7 out of *1000* would be 2.97%.
Seriously, though, is Canada's abortion rate really nearly 1 in 3. Egad, it
is!
http://www.webhart.net/vandee/abortstat.shtml#Therapeutic
Interestingly, the number from the US declines steadily since Roe v. Wade.
Watch that stat jump.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 10:23:07 PM |
|
|
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:ejlim3le0f909j3sdl5uvtv2usjfkvgcao@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:46:01 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Actually, for people *really* bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 would be
29.7%. <G>
29.7 out of *1000* would be 2.97%.
Nope.
Out of each 129.7 pregnancies, 100 resulted in live births (excluding
miscarriages)
The OPs figure of 22% (approx) is correct.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
20 Dec 2007 01:15:16 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:23:07 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:ejlim3le0f909j3sdl5uvtv2usjfkvgcao@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:46:01 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Actually, for people *really* bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 would be
29.7%. <G>
29.7 out of *1000* would be 2.97%.
Nope.
Out of each 129.7 pregnancies, 100 resulted in live births (excluding
miscarriages)
The OPs figure of 22% (approx) is correct.
Well, then, that would be 29.7 out of 129.7, not 29.7 out of 100,
wouldn't it? <G>
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
20 Dec 2007 06:32:07 PM |
|
|
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:0i5km3t0l744necp9pbofsbpnsirnd75mg@4ax.com...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:23:07 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:ejlim3le0f909j3sdl5uvtv2usjfkvgcao@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:46:01 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Actually, for people *really* bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 would be
29.7%. <G>
29.7 out of *1000* would be 2.97%.
Nope.
Out of each 129.7 pregnancies, 100 resulted in live births (excluding
miscarriages)
The OPs figure of 22% (approx) is correct.
Well, then, that would be 29.7 out of 129.7, not 29.7 out of 100,
wouldn't it? <G>
Indeed it would, but only 100 of those 129.7 pregnancies resulted in a live
birth.
Clue...If the pregnancy is aborted there can be no live birth.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
26 Dec 2007 09:55:49 AM |
|
|
John Baker wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:46:01 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like
2.97%! ;-)
Actually, for people *really* bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 would be
29.7%. <G>
No, that would be what it is for people that are *not* bad at math. It was a
bad joke.
29.7 out of *1000* would be 2.97%.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies NewStudy Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 10:59:40 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:37:50 -0500, John Baker wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:46:01 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like 2.97%!
;-)
Actually, for people *really* bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 would be
29.7%. <G>
29.7 out of *1000* would be 2.97%.
There are three kinds of people in this world: those who can count and
those who can't.
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“The alms-giver, in return for a trifling expenditure
on this earth, will be rewarded with an infinity of bliss
post-mortem. This purely selfish note is struck with
great clarity by Judaism, and only less clearly by
Christianity....religion has not really promoted charity,
but debased it.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
26 Dec 2007 09:56:32 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:37:50 -0500, John Baker wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:46:01 -0500, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
Chom Noamsky wrote:
Compare that to the rate of induced
abortion, which in Canada is 29.7 per 100 live births (or 22% for
people bad at math).
For people bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 isn't 22%, it's more like
2.97%! ;-)
Actually, for people *really* bad at math, 29.7 out of 100 would be
29.7%. <G>
29.7 out of *1000* would be 2.97%.
There are three kinds of people in this world: those who can count and
those who can't.
Again...it was a joke...lame though that it was.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: J Young is the ultimate proof that abortion must remain legal |
18 Dec 2007 11:23:09 PM |
|
|
On 19 Dez., 06:12, "J Young" <jyoungvisi...@aol.com> wrote:
It is my duty to all the ladies to present this information.
And it's my duty to call you a pathetic liar and a hypocrite nazi
turd..
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/dec/07121803.html
And we should believe this site because...
How many times do I have to tell you that if you want to be taken
seriously, you should use serious sources?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Duncan Patton" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies NewStudy Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 03:45:41 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:12:57 -0500
"J Young" <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote:
It is my duty to all the ladies to present this information.
Had you any honor, your duty would be Seppuku.
Dhu
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/dec/07121803.html
Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms
RICHMOND, VA, December 18, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Women who have had an
abortion run three times the normal risk of having a subsequent low
birthweight baby, suggests research in the Journal of Epidemiology and
Community Health.
The study titled "Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and
preterm births" is published in the January 2008 edition of the journal on
pages 16-22.
The more abortions a woman has, the greater are her chances of giving birth
to a child that is underweight or premature in the future, the research
shows.
Low birthweight (under 2500 g) and premature birth (less than 37 weeks) are
two of the major contributors to deaths among newborn babies and infants.
The authors used data from the United States Collaborative Perinatal
Project, which was set up in 1959 to look at the associations between
factors during pregnancy and birth and childhood development.
In total, more than 45,500 mother and child pairs were assessed. Nearly 40%
of the mothers had one or two children and almost two thirds were between 20
and 29 years of age.
Rates of low birthweight and premature birth were highest among mothers who
were black, young or old, poorly educated, and unmarried.
But there was a strong association between abortion and an early or
underweight birth, even after adjusting for other influential factors, such
as smoking, high blood pressure and heavy drinking.
Women who had had one, two, or three or more abortions in the past were
almost three, five, and 9 times as likely to give birth to an underweight
child as those without previous abortions.
Similarly, women who had one abortion were 67% more likely to have a
premature birth, while those who had had three or more were over three times
as likely to do so compared with those with no history of abortion.
The authors acknowledge that previous research has been inconclusive, with
some studies reporting no increased risk while others have found a
significantly increased risk.
Nevertheless, women and healthcare professionals should be aware of the
potential risks, they conclude.
Click here to view the paper in full:
http://press.psprings.co.uk/jech/december/16_ch50369.pdf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Copyright: LifeSiteNews.com. Permission to republish is granted (with
limitation*) but acknowledgement of source is *REQUIRED* (use
LifeSiteNews.com).
NEWS TIPS to or call toll free 1-866-787-9947.
Donate to LifeSiteNews.com at http://www.lifesite.net/contribute/
--
J Young
jyoungvisions@aol.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
26 Dec 2007 11:38:22 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:12:57 -0500, "J Young" <jyoungvisions@aol.com>
wrote:
It is my duty to all the ladies to present this information.
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/dec/07121803.html
Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms
So how big do you really want something coming out of a bodily orifice
to be?
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies New Study Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 11:39:04 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:12:57 -0500, "J Young" <jyoungvisions@aol.com>
wrote:
It is my duty to all the ladies to present this information.
Lying again I see, IBen.
Do you never tire of being a laughing stock?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion Triples Chances of Future Low Birthweight Babies NewStudy Confirms |
19 Dec 2007 11:07:50 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:12:57 -0500, J Young wrote:
It is my mental illness to lie to all the ladies.
..
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“Honor is simply the morality of superior men.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
